REVIEW 2 cited by
Multilingual Performance Biases of Large Language Models in Education
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted in educational settings. These applications expand beyond English, though current LLMs remain primarily English-centric. In this work, we ascertain if their use in education settings in non-English languages is warranted. We evaluated the performance of popular LLMs on four educational tasks: identifying student misconceptions, providing targeted feedback, interactive tutoring, and grading translations in eight languages (Mandarin, Hindi, Arabic, German, Farsi, Telugu, Ukrainian, Czech) in addition to English. We find that the performance on these tasks somewhat corresponds to the amount of language represented in training data, with lower-resource languages having poorer task performance. Although the models perform reasonably well in most languages, the frequent performance drop from English is significant. Thus, we recommend that practitioners first verify that the LLM works well in the target language for their educational task before deployment.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Alvorada-Bench: Can Language Models Solve Brazilian University Entrance Exams?
Language models now exceed 94% accuracy on Brazilian entrance exams, but still lag on mathematics and specialized engineering exams.
-
LLM Web Dynamics: Tracing Model Collapse in a Network of LLMs
Under a shared retrieval-augmented memory, multiple LLMs' outputs converge to near-identical semantic answers, and the analogous Gaussian mixture system is proven to collapse.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.