Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 109 references

Radial Oscillations of the HESS J1731-347 Compact Object via the Karmarkar Condition in Gravity

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that HESS J1731-347 can be modeled as an anisotropic Karmarkar star whose interior matches the observed mass and radius, and whose fundamental radial oscillation lies at 5.81 kHz, above the 4.48 kHz isotropic Tolman IV…

desk verdict The static Karmarkar model is fine, but the Table 1 oscillation spectrum likely uses an isotropic surface condition that is invalid for this anisotropic star, so the central quantitative claim is unsupported as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.20347 v2 pith:WI23KQCD submitted 2025-04-29 gr-qc astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR

Grigoris Panotopoulos This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords HESSJ1731-347KarmarkarconditionanisotropicstarsradialoscillationsembeddingclassoneTolmanIVsolutioncompactobjectsrelativisticasteroseismology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the compact object HESS J1731-347, with observed mass and radius, can be described in general relativity as an anisotropic star whose interior metric satisfies the Karmarkar condition. Three free parameters are fixed by matching the known mass and radius, and the resulting exact analytic solution is shown to meet the standard criteria for realistic stars: regular center, positive monotone density and pressures, subluminal sound speeds, and energy conditions. The paper then computes the radial oscillation modes and finds a fundamental mode at $5.81\,\mathrm{kHz}$, noticeably higher than the $4.48\,\mathrm{kHz}$ obtained for an isotropic Tolman IV model of nearly the same mass and radius. The higher frequencies follow from the higher sound speed of the anisotropic model, and the asymptotic large-frequency separation is also larger, $6.48\,\mathrm{kHz}$ versus $5.36\,\mathrm{kHz}$. If correct, the result turns the oscillation spectrum into a way to tell anisotropic from isotropic interiors.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Karmarkar condition, which requires the spacetime to be of embedding class one and relates the two metric potentials through $e^{\lambda}=1+B^2(\nu')^2 e^{\nu}/4$. Taking the Krori-Barua potential $\nu=C+(r/A)^2$ as the seed, the field equations give closed-form expressions for density, radial and tangential pressures, and the anisotropic factor; the three constants are fixed by surface matching to the Schwarzschild exterior. The oscillation spectrum is obtained from the first-order system of coupled perturbation equations for anisotropic stars with boundary conditions at the center and at the stellar surface; the shooting method selects the discrete eigenfrequencies, whose Sturm-Liouville ordering gives the mode number as the number of nodes.

What would settle it

Compute the radial oscillation spectrum of the same model after replacing the isotropic surface boundary condition (46) with one derived from the anisotropic junction at $R$, where the anisotropic factor does not vanish; if the fundamental mode moves substantially away from $5.81\,\mathrm{kHz}$, the reported spectrum is not robust. Alternatively, a future gravitational-wave observation that places the fundamental radial mode of HESS J1731-347 clearly below or above the predicted $5.81\,\mathrm{kHz}$ window would rule the model out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that choosing the Krori-Barua metric potential $\nu(r)=C+(r/A)^2$ and completing it through the Karmarkar condition produces an exact anisotropic interior solution with parameters $A=27.90\,\mathrm{km}$, $B=44.64\,\mathrm{km}$, and $C=-0.39$ that reproduces the HESS J1731-347 mass and radius, $M=0.77\,M_\odot$ and $R=10.47\,\mathrm{km}$. The paper shows that this solution satisfies causality, the energy conditions, and the adiabatic-index stability criterion, and that its density and pressure profiles closely resemble those of a strange quark star described by a linear bag-model equation of state. Solving the Sturm-Liouville system for anisotropic radial oscillations with the stated center and surface boundary conditions yields a fundamental mode at $5.81\,\mathrm{kHz}$, with overtones at $12.62$, $19.20$, $25.72$, and higher frequencies, compared with $4.48$, $10.27$, $15.76$, and $21.17\,\mathrm{kHz}$ for the isotropic Tolman IV model of almost the same mass and radius. The large-frequency separation approaches a constant at high overtones, about $6.48\,\mathrm{kHz}$ for the anisotropic model and $5.36\,\mathrm{kHz}$ for the isotropic one.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the star's interior is exactly described by the embedding-class-one (Karmarkar) metric with the Krori-Barua potential, a mathematical ansatz chosen for tractability rather than derived from a microphysical equation of state; if real compact-star matter does not belong to this metric class, the predicted oscillation frequencies do not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If HESS J1731-347 is an anisotropic Karmarkar star, its fundamental radial mode should sit near 5.81 kHz rather than the 4.48 kHz predicted by the isotropic Tolman IV model, a gap that future high-sensitivity detectors in the kHz band could in principle resolve.
  • The asymptotic large-frequency separation of high overtones approaches a constant set by the sound-speed traversal time, so a measured spacing of about 6.48 kHz (instead of 5.36 kHz) would indicate a higher average sound speed and support the anisotropic interpretation.
  • The mass-radius curve of the Karmarkar solution can reach a maximum near 3 M_sun, so positive anisotropy allows the same geometric family to support substantially heavier compact objects while still accommodating the light HESS object.
  • The solution's pressure-energy-density relation is nearly linear and lies close to a strange-quark-star model, so the paper's construction is consistent with the proposal that HESS J1731-347 could be a strange star rather than a conventional neutron star.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the asymptotic large-frequency separation depends only on the sound-speed traversal time, the predicted 6.48 kHz constant could be checked against future asteroseismic observations without needing to identify individual mode numbers.
  • Using different seed metric potentials inside the same Karmarkar construction would generate a family of anisotropic models; comparing their fundamental-mode frequencies with 5.81 kHz would show how strongly the oscillation prediction depends on the choice of the geometric ansatz.
  • The same construction could be applied to other compact objects with well-measured masses and radii, where the two competing models (anisotropic Karmarkar versus isotropic Tolman IV) make distinct frequency predictions that would amount to a discrimination test.
  • The paper's oscillation equations import a surface boundary condition from the isotropic case; a logical next step would be to re-derive that condition for a surface with non-vanishing anisotropy and check whether the reported eigenfrequencies survive.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs an exact analytic interior solution for static, spherically symmetric, anisotropic stars in Einstein gravity by imposing the Karmarkar (embedding class one) condition together with a Krori-Barua metric potential, nu = C + (r/A)^2. The three free parameters are fixed by matching the interior metric to Schwarzschild at the surface of HESS J1731-347, using M = 0.77 solar masses and R = 10.47 km. The author then checks standard criteria for realistic solutions (regularity, causality, energy conditions, and the adiabatic-index stability condition), compares the resulting pressure-density relation with an MIT bag model, and solves the radial oscillation equations (43)-(44) with boundary conditions (45)-(46). The paper reports the eight lowest radial eigenfrequencies in Table 1 and compares them with the isotropic Tolman IV model of similar mass and radius, also quoting large frequency separations.

Significance. If the calculation were fully correct, the paper would provide a concrete, analytic model of a known compact object with a falsifiable prediction for its radial oscillation spectrum, and it would illustrate how anisotropy shifts the mode frequencies relative to the isotropic Tolman IV description. The analytic construction is transparent, the matching procedure is standard, and the oscillation frequencies are genuine outputs rather than fitted quantities, so there is no circularity in the central claim. However, the quantitative spectrum depends on a surface boundary condition whose anisotropic corrections are omitted, so the significance of the reported frequencies is presently uncertain.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section IV.A, Eq. (46) and Table I] The surface boundary condition used to obtain the frequencies in Table I is the isotropic condition, but the perturbation system being integrated is the anisotropic system (43)-(44). Requiring the 1/(R-r) terms in Eq. (44) to cancel near the surface gives eta(R) = -A xi(R) with A = 4 + R p1/rho1 + [omega^2 R rho1 (1-2M/R)^{-2} - 8 pi rho1 R (1-2M/R)^{-1} Delta(R) + 8 Delta(R)/R]/p1, where p1 = -P'(R) and rho1 = rho(R). The last two terms are absent from Eq. (46). For the fitted solution, Delta(R) = R^2/[8 pi (A^2 + 2 R^2)^2] is about 4.4e-6 km^-2, rho1 is about 2.5e-4 km^-2, and p1 is about 2.5e-6 km^-3. With these values the corrected boundary coefficient is approximately 5.3 + 1.7 s^2 instead of 4.1 + 1.3 s^2, so at the fundamental mode (s^2 near 15) the surface ratio changes by about 8. Since the shooting method in Section IV.C enforces Eq. (46), the frequencies reported in Table I are not a valid consequence of Eqs. (43)-(44) unless the author demonstrates that the Delta(R) terms cancel or derives and uses the correct anisotropic boundary condition.
  2. [Section IV.A, Eqs. (43) and (44)] For Delta(R) different from zero, Eq. (43) itself is singular at the surface through the term -2 Delta/(r P Gamma) xi. The near-surface behavior of xi is therefore not the constant, finite value assumed by the isotropic boundary condition (46); rather, xi behaves as (R-r)^c with c = 2 Delta(R)/(R P(R) Gamma(R)) up to factors, and the coupled regularity analysis of the two first-order equations is needed to define the correct shooting target. The manuscript does not provide this analysis, and the boundary condition (46) is asserted without derivation for the anisotropic case. This is load-bearing because Table 1 is the paper's central quantitative result.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section III.B and Fig. 1, middle panel] The text says that the TOV equations are integrated numerically using the p-rho relationship to obtain the mass-radius curve. It should specify whether and how the anisotropic factor Delta(r) is included in that integration; if Delta is set to zero, the resulting curve is not the mass-radius relation of the anisotropic solution.
  2. [Section II.B, Eq. (22)] It would be helpful to state explicitly that Delta(R) is nonzero for the fitted parameters, since this value enters the radial-oscillation boundary condition discussed in the major comments.
  3. [Section IV.C and Eq. (58)] The quoted asymptotic large frequency separations, Delta nu_iso approximately 5.36 kHz and Delta nu_aniso approximately 6.48 kHz, are given without numerical integration details or error estimates; stating the integration grid and convergence criteria would improve reproducibility.
  4. [Title and abstract] The phrase 'in Gravity' is ambiguous; the work is performed in Einstein's general relativity, so 'in General Relativity' would be clearer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the model parameters are fitted to observed mass and radius in the standard way, while the radial oscillation frequencies are genuine outputs not used in any fit.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The interior solution is constructed by assuming the Krori-Barua potential nu = C + (r/A)^2 and imposing the Karmarkar condition, yielding explicit expressions for the mass function, density, pressures, and anisotropy. The three constants A, B, C are then fixed by the matching conditions at the surface to the observed mass and radius of HESS J1731-347 (Eqs. 36-37). This is a standard fitting of input data, not a prediction masquerading as an independent result. The physical criteria (causality, energy conditions, stability via the adiabatic index) are computed for the resulting background and are genuine checks, not used to determine the parameters. The radial oscillation frequencies in Table 1 are obtained by solving the Sturm-Liouville system Eqs. (43)-(44) with boundary conditions (45)-(46) for that fitted background; no frequency or other output is fed back into the parameter determination. The comparison with the Tolman IV isotropic model uses parameters from an earlier independent publication [97], and the anisotropic oscillation equations are taken from the established literature [100]; these self-citations are not load-bearing because the equations are standard and externally checkable. The M-R curves are parametric re-expressions of the same analytic solution, but the paper does not present them as independent predictions. No step reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central model rests on the Karmarkar condition and the Krori-Barua potential ansatz, which are imposed rather than derived; three parameters A,B,C are fitted to the observed mass and radius. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • A = 27.90 km
    Metric potential scale parameter in ν = C + (r/A)^2; fixed by matching conditions to M=0.77 Msun, R=10.47 km.
  • B = 44.64 km
    Integration constant from the Karmarkar condition in e^λ = 1 + B^2 r^2 e^ν/A^4; fixed by matching conditions.
  • C = -0.39
    Constant in the Krori-Barua metric potential; fixed by matching conditions.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The spacetime is static, spherically symmetric, and described by the metric (1).
    Standard for relativistic stars; introduced in Section II.A.
  • domain assumption Matter is a perfect anisotropic fluid with diagonal energy-momentum tensor (6).
    Assumed in Section II.A.
  • ad hoc to paper The Karmarkar condition (embedding class one) is imposed, leading to Eqs. (13)-(15).
    A mathematical ansatz, not derived from microphysics; central to the model in Section II.B.
  • ad hoc to paper The metric potential takes the Krori-Barua form ν = C + (r/A)^2.
    Chosen in Section II.B to generate the solution; other potentials would give different results, as acknowledged in Section III.B.
  • domain assumption Radial oscillation equations (43)-(44) and boundary conditions (45)-(46) from Ref. [100] apply to this anisotropic star.
    Standard asteroseismology formalism; the surface condition (46) is taken over from the isotropic case without explicit derivation for anisotropic matter.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Radial Oscillations of the HESS J1731-347 Compact Object via the Karmarkar Condition in Gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WI23KQCD

@misc{pith2026250420347,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Radial Oscillations of the HESS J1731-347 Compact Object via the Karmarkar Condition in Gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WI23KQCD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.20347}
}
read the original abstract

We model the light HESS J1731-347 compact object (of known stellar mass and radius) within Einstein's General Relativity imposing the Karmarkar condition in gravity for anisotropic stars. The three free parameters of the analytic solution are determined imposing the matching conditions at the surface of the star for objects of known stellar mass and radius. Finally, using well established criteria it is shown that the solution is compatible with all requirements for well behaved and realistic solutions. Furthermore, we study the radial oscillation modes, and we compare to the ones corresponding to an isotropic star modeled by the Tolman IV exact analytic solution obtained long time ago. A comparison between the large frequency separations is made as well.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.20347 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Mass-to radius-relationships (upper and middle panels), and pressure versus energy density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Energy density and pressures (upper panel), and pressures and anisotropic factor (lower panel) versus radial coordinate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Speed of sound (upper panel) and relativistic adiabatic index (lower panel) versus dimensionless radial coordinate, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Large frequency separations for isotropic star (Tolman IV solution, upper panel) and anisotropic object (via Karmarkar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Radial profiles of eigenfunctions versus normalized radial coordinate, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Speed of sound versus radial coordinate for anisotropic star (red solid curve) and isotropic object (black dashed curve). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Field Equations of Gravitation,

    A. Einstein, “The Field Equations of Gravitation,” Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.) 1915, 844-847 (1915)

    1915

  2. [2]

    Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Gravitation , John Wiley and Sons, 1972

    S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Gravitation , John Wiley and Sons, 1972

    1972

  3. [3]

    C. W. Meisner, K. S. Thorne and J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation, Princeton University Press, 1973

    1973

  4. [4]

    Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,

    B. P. Abbott et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, no.6, 061102 (2016) [arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence,

    B. P. Abbott et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo], “GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, no.24, 241103 (2016) [arXiv:1606.04855 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2,

    B. P. Abbott et al. [LIGO Scientific and VIRGO], “GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, no.22, 221101 (2017) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, no.12, 129901 (2018)] [arXiv:1706.01812 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Tests of General Relativity: A Review,

    E. Asmodelle, “Tests of General Relativity: A Review,” [arXiv:1705.04397 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. Maccallum, C. Hoenselaers and E. Herlt, Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2003

    2003

Show all 109 references
  1. [9]

    Pulsars: Structure and dynamics,

    R. Ruderman, “Pulsars: Structure and dynamics,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys., 10 (1972) 427

    1972

  2. [10]

    Anisotropic Spheres in General Relativity,

    R. L. Bowers and E. P. T. Liang, “Anisotropic Spheres in General Relativity,” Astrophys. J., 188 (1974) 657

    1974

  3. [11]

    Phase transitions in a superfluid neutron liquid,

    A. I. Sokolov, “Phase transitions in a superfluid neutron liquid,” JETP 79 (1980) 1137

    1980

  4. [12]

    Condensed π− Phase in Neutron Star Matter,

    R. F. Sawyer, “Condensed π− Phase in Neutron Star Matter,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 29 (1972) 823

    1972

  5. [13]

    Kippenhahn and A

    R. Kippenhahn and A. Weigert, Stellar structure and evolution , Springer, Berlin, 1990. 11

    1990

  6. [14]

    Decoupling gravitational sources in general relativity: from perfect to anisotropic fluids,

    J. Ovalle, “Decoupling gravitational sources in general relativity: from perfect to anisotropic fluids,” Phys. Rev. D 95, no.10, 104019 (2017) [arXiv:1704.05899 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Searching exact solutions for compact stars in braneworld: A Conjecture,

    J. Ovalle, “Searching exact solutions for compact stars in braneworld: A Conjecture,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23, 3247-3263 (2008) [arXiv:gr-qc/0703095 [gr-qc]]

    2008 arXiv

  8. [16]

    A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3370-3373 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9905221 [hep-ph]]

    1999 arXiv

  9. [17]

    An Alternative to compactification,

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, “An Alternative to compactification,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4690-4693 (1999) [arXiv:hep- th/9906064 [hep-th]]

    1999

  10. [18]

    A new family of analytical anisotropic solutions by gravitational decoupling,

    M. Estrada and F. Tello-Ortiz, “A new family of analytical anisotropic solutions by gravitational decoupling,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, no.11, 453 (2018) [arXiv:1803.02344 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Compact Anisotropic Models in General Relativity by Gravitational Decoupling,

    E. Morales and F. Tello-Ortiz, “Compact Anisotropic Models in General Relativity by Gravitational Decoupling,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78, no.10, 841 (2018) [arXiv:1808.01699 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    The Gravitational decoupling method: the higher dimensional case to find new analytic solutions,

    M. Estrada and R. Prado, “The Gravitational decoupling method: the higher dimensional case to find new analytic solutions,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134, no.4, 168 (2019) [arXiv:1809.03591 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Black holes by gravitational decoupling,

    J. Ovalle, R. Casadio, R. d. Rocha, A. Sotomayor and Z. Stuchlik, “Black holes by gravitational decoupling,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78, no.11, 960 (2018) [arXiv:1804.03468 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Non-uniform Braneworld Stars: An Exact Solution,

    J. Ovalle, “Non-uniform Braneworld Stars: An Exact Solution,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 18, 837-852 (2009) [arXiv:0809.3547 [gr-qc]]

    2009 arXiv

  15. [23]

    The Schwarzschild’s Braneworld Solution,

    J. Ovalle, “The Schwarzschild’s Braneworld Solution,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 25, 3323-3334 (2010) [arXiv:1009.3674 [gr-qc]]

    2010 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Brane-world stars and (microscopic) black holes,

    R. Casadio and J. Ovalle, “Brane-world stars and (microscopic) black holes,” Phys. Lett. B 715, 251-255 (2012) [arXiv:1201.6145 [gr-qc]]

    2012 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Brane-world stars from minimal geometric deformation, and black holes,

    R. Casadio and J. Ovalle, “Brane-world stars from minimal geometric deformation, and black holes,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 46, 1669 (2014) [arXiv:1212.0409 [gr-qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Brane-world stars with a solid crust and vacuum exterior,

    J. Ovalle, L. ´A. Gergely and R. Casadio, “Brane-world stars with a solid crust and vacuum exterior,” Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 045015 (2015) [arXiv:1405.0252 [gr-qc]]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Decoupling gravitational sources in general relativity: The extended case,

    J. Ovalle, “Decoupling gravitational sources in general relativity: The extended case,” Phys. Lett. B 788, 213-218 (2019) [arXiv:1812.03000 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Extended quantum portrait of MGD black holes and information entropy,

    A. Fernandes-Silva, A. J. Ferreira-Martins and R. da Rocha, “Extended quantum portrait of MGD black holes and information entropy,” Phys. Lett. B 791, 323-330 (2019) [arXiv:1901.07492 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [29]

    New definition of complexity for self-gravitating fluid distributions: The spherically symmetric, static case,

    L. Herrera, “New definition of complexity for self-gravitating fluid distributions: The spherically symmetric, static case,” Phys. Rev. D 97, no.4, 044010 (2018) [arXiv:1801.08358 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Abbas and H

    G. Abbas and H. Nazar, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, no.6, 510 (2018) [arXiv:1806.05042 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Complexity Factor for Charged Spherical System,

    M. Sharif and I. I. Butt, “Complexity Factor for Charged Spherical System,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78, no.8, 688 (2018) [arXiv:1808.00903 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Complexity Factor For Anisotropic Source in Non-minimal Coupling Metric f(R) Gravity,

    G. Abbas and H. Nazar, “Complexity Factor For Anisotropic Source in Non-minimal Coupling Metric f(R) Gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78, no.11, 957 (2018) [arXiv:1811.04858 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Complexity factor for dynamical spherically symmetric fluid distributions in f(R) gravity,

    H. Nazar and G. Abbas, “Complexity factor for dynamical spherically symmetric fluid distributions in f(R) gravity,” Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 16, no.11, 1950170 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Complexity factor for static sphere in self-interacting Brans–Dicke gravity,

    M. Sharif and A. Majid, “Complexity factor for static sphere in self-interacting Brans–Dicke gravity,” Chin. J. Phys. 61, 38-46 (2019) [arXiv:1910.06105 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Complexity factor for self-gravitating system in modified Gauss–Bonnet gravity,

    M. Sharif, A. Majid and M. M. M. Nasir, “Complexity factor for self-gravitating system in modified Gauss–Bonnet gravity,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 34, no.32, 1950210 (2019)

    2019

  28. [36]

    Framework for generalized polytropes with complexity factor,

    S. Khan, S. A. Mardan and M. A. Rehman, “Framework for generalized polytropes with complexity factor,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, no.12, 1037 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Complexity factor for anisotropic self-gravitating sphere in Rastall gravity,

    H. Nazar, A. H. Alkhaldi, G. Abbas and M. R. Shahzad, “Complexity factor for anisotropic self-gravitating sphere in Rastall gravity,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 36, no.31n32, 2150233 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Anisotropic star models in the context of vanishing complexity,

    C. Arias, E. Contreras, E. Fuenmayor and A. Ramos, “Anisotropic star models in the context of vanishing complexity,” Annals Phys. 436, 168671 (2022) [arXiv:2208.10594 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Anisotropic Quark Stars with an Interacting Quark Equation of State within the Complexity Factor Formalism,

    A. Rincon, G. Panotopoulos and I. Lopes, “Anisotropic Quark Stars with an Interacting Quark Equation of State within the Complexity Factor Formalism,” Universe 9, no.2, 72 (2023) [arXiv:2301.13684 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Anisotropic stars made of exotic matter within the complexity factor formal- ism,

    ´A. Rinc´ on, G. Panotopoulos and I. Lopes, “Anisotropic stars made of exotic matter within the complexity factor formal- ism,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, no.2, 116 (2023) [arXiv:2302.00125 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Gravitational metrics of spherical symmetry and class one,

    K. R. Karmarkar, “Gravitational metrics of spherical symmetry and class one,” Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. A 27, 56 (1948)

    1948

  34. [42]

    A new exact anisotropic solution of embedding class one,

    S. K. Maurya, S. T.T., Y. K. Gupta and F. Rahaman, “A new exact anisotropic solution of embedding class one,” Eur. Phys. J. A 52, no.7, 191 (2016) [arXiv:1512.01667 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [43]

    A new solution of embedding class I representing anisotropic fluid sphere in general relativity,

    K. N. Singh, P. Bhar and N. Pant, “A new solution of embedding class I representing anisotropic fluid sphere in general relativity,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25, no.14, 1650099 (2016) [arXiv:1604.01013 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Modelling of anisotropic compact stars of embedding class one,

    P. Bhar, S. K. Maurya, Y. K. Gupta and T. Manna, “Modelling of anisotropic compact stars of embedding class one,” Eur. Phys. J. A 52, no.10, 312 (2016) [arXiv:1604.00531 [gr-qc]]

    2016 arXiv

  37. [45]

    A new model for spherically symmetric charged compact stars of embedding class 1,

    S. K. Maurya, Y. K. Gupta, S. Ray and D. Deb, “A new model for spherically symmetric charged compact stars of embedding class 1,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, no.1, 45 (2017) [arXiv:1605.01268 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Anisotropic charged compact star of embedding class I,

    P. Bhar and M. Govender, “Anisotropic charged compact star of embedding class I,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26, no.06, 1750053 (2016) 12

    2016

  39. [47]

    Anisotropic fluid spheres of embedding class one using Karmarkar condition,

    S. K. Maurya and S. D. Maharaj, “Anisotropic fluid spheres of embedding class one using Karmarkar condition,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77, no.5, 328 (2017) [arXiv:1702.04192 [physics.gen-ph]]

    2017 arXiv

  40. [48]

    A new class of relativistic model of compact stars of embedding class I,

    P. Bhar, K. N. Singh and T. Manna, “A new class of relativistic model of compact stars of embedding class I,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 26, no.09, 1750090 (2017) [arXiv:1703.03289 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Anisotropic relativistic fluid spheres: an embedding class I approach,

    F. Tello-Ortiz, S. K. Maurya, A. Errehymy, K. N. Singh and M. Daoud, “Anisotropic relativistic fluid spheres: an embedding class I approach,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79, no.11, 885 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    A generalised embedding class one static solution describing anisotropic fluid sphere,

    M. K. Jasim, S. K. Maurya and A. S. M. Al-Sawaii, “A generalised embedding class one static solution describing anisotropic fluid sphere,” Astrophys. Space Sci. 365, no.1, 9 (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    An analytical anisotropic compact stellar model of embedding class I,

    L. Baskey, S. Das and F. Rahaman, “An analytical anisotropic compact stellar model of embedding class I,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36, no.05, 2150028 (2021) [arXiv:2012.14147 [gr-qc]]

    2021 arXiv

  44. [52]

    A Generic Embedding Class-I Model via Karmarkar Condition in Gravity,

    M. Zubair, S. Waheed and H. Javaid, “A Generic Embedding Class-I Model via Karmarkar Condition in Gravity,” Adv. Astron. 2021, 6685578 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    Shapiro Delay Measurement of A Two Solar Mass Neutron Star,

    P. Demorest, T. Pennucci, S. Ransom, M. Roberts and J. Hessels, “Shapiro Delay Measurement of A Two Solar Mass Neutron Star,” Nature 467, 1081-1083 (2010) [arXiv:1010.5788 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2010 arXiv

  46. [54]

    A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary,

    J. Antoniadis, P. C. C. Freire, N. Wex, T. M. Tauris, R. S. Lynch, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Kramer, C. Bassa, V. S. Dhillon and T. Driebe, et al. “A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary,” Science 340, 6131 (2013) [arXiv:1304.6875 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2013 arXiv

  47. [55]

    A Joint X-ray and Optical Study of the Massive Redback Pulsar J2215+5135,

    A. G. Sullivan and R. W. Romani, “A Joint X-ray and Optical Study of the Massive Redback Pulsar J2215+5135,” [arXiv:2405.13889 [astro-ph.HE]]

    arXiv

  48. [56]

    Strange quark matter and compact stars,

    F. Weber, “Strange quark matter and compact stars,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.54, 193-288 (2005) [arXiv:astro-ph/0407155 [astro-ph]]

    2005 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Constraining values of bag constant for strange star candidates,

    A. Aziz, S. Ray, F. Rahaman, M. Khlopov and B. K. Guha, “Constraining values of bag constant for strange star candidates,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 28, no.13, 1941006 (2019) [arXiv:1906.00063 [gr-qc]]

    2019 arXiv

  50. [58]

    The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data,

    M. C. Miller, F. K. Lamb, A. J. Dittmann, S. Bogdanov, Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, S. Guillot, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer and M. Loewenstein, et al. “The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, no.2, L28 (2021) [arXiv:2105.06979 ...

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM- Newton Spectroscopy,

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, P. S. Ray, S. Bogdanov, S. Guillot, S. M. Morsink, A. V. Bilous, Z. Arzoumanian, D. Choudhury and J. S. Deneva, et al. “A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM- Newton Spectroscopy,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, ...

    2021 arXiv

  52. [60]

    The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER with NICER Background Estimates,

    T. Salmi, S. Vinciguerra, D. Choudhury, T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, R. A. Remillard, P. S. Ray, S. Bogdanov, S. Guillot and Z. Arzoumanian, et al. “The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER with NICER Background Estimates,” Astrophys. J. 941, no.2, 150 (2022) [arXiv:2209.12840 [as...

    2022 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Victor Doroshenko, Valery Suleimanov, Gerd P¨ uhlhofer, and Andrea Santangelo, ”A strangely light neutron star within a supernova remnant,” Nature Astronomy, 6(12):1444–1451, Dec 2022

    2022

  54. [62]

    What Is the Nature of the HESS J1731-347 Compact Object?,

    V. Sagun, E. Giangrandi, T. Dietrich, O. Ivanytskyi, R. Negreiros and C. Providˆ encia, “What Is the Nature of the HESS J1731-347 Compact Object?,” Astrophys. J. 958, no.1, 49 (2023) [arXiv:2306.12326 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Radial oscillations of neutral and charged hybrid stars,

    A. Brillante and I. N. Mishustin, “Radial oscillations of neutral and charged hybrid stars,” EPL 105, no.3, 39001 (2014) [arXiv:1401.7915 [astro-ph.SR]]

    2014 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Radial oscillations of relativistic stars,

    K. D. Kokkotas and J. Ruoff, “Radial oscillations of relativistic stars,” Astron. Astrophys. 366, 565 (2001) [arXiv:gr- qc/0011093 [gr-qc]]

    2001

  57. [65]

    Non-radial oscillation modes as a probe of density discontinuities in neutron stars,

    G. Miniutti, J. A. Pons, E. Berti, L. Gualtieri and V. Ferrari, “Non-radial oscillation modes as a probe of density discontinuities in neutron stars,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 338, 389 (2003) [arXiv:astro-ph/0206142 [astro-ph]]

    2003 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Radial oscillations of strange quark stars admixed with condensed dark matter,

    G. Panotopoulos and I. Lopes, “Radial oscillations of strange quark stars admixed with condensed dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 96, no.8, 083013 (2017) [arXiv:1709.06643 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Coupling of radial and axial non-radial oscillations of compact stars: Gravitational waves from first-order differential rotation,

    A. Passamonti, M. Bruni, L. Gualtieri, A. Nagar and C. F. Sopuerta, “Coupling of radial and axial non-radial oscillations of compact stars: Gravitational waves from first-order differential rotation,” Phys. Rev. D 73, 084010 (2006) [arXiv:gr- qc/0601001 [gr-qc]]

    2006

  60. [68]

    Coupling of radial and non-radial oscillations of relativistic stars: Gauge-invariant formalism,

    A. Passamonti, M. Bruni, L. Gualtieri and C. F. Sopuerta, “Coupling of radial and non-radial oscillations of relativistic stars: Gauge-invariant formalism,” Phys. Rev. D 71, 024022 (2005) [arXiv:gr-qc/0407108 [gr-qc]]

    2005 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Non-radial oscillations of the rapidly rotating Be star HD 163868,

    G. J. Savonije, “Non-radial oscillations of the rapidly rotating Be star HD 163868,” Astron. Astrophys. 469, 1057 (2007) [arXiv:0705.1755 [astro-ph]]

    2007 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Nonradial oscillation modes of compact stars with a crust,

    C. V´ asquez Flores, Z. B. Hall, II and P. Jaikumar, “Nonradial oscillation modes of compact stars with a crust,” Phys. Rev. C 96, no.6, 065803 (2017) [arXiv:1708.05985 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Radial oscillations of color superconducting self-bound quark stars,

    C. Vasquez Flores and G. Lugones, “Radial oscillations of color superconducting self-bound quark stars,” Phys. Rev. D 82, 063006 (2010) [arXiv:1008.4882 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2010 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Quaking neutron stars,

    L. M. Franco, B. Link and R. I. Epstein, “Quaking neutron stars,” Astrophys. J. 543, 987 (2000) [arXiv:astro-ph/9911105 [astro-ph]]

    2000 arXiv

  65. [73]

    R mode runaway and rapidly rotating neutron stars,

    N. Andersson, D. I. Jones, K. D. Kokkotas and N. Stergioulas, “R mode runaway and rapidly rotating neutron stars,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 534, L75 (2000) [arXiv:astro-ph/0002114 [astro-ph]]

    2000 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Resonant Shattering of Neutron Star Crusts,

    D. Tsang, J. S. Read, T. Hinderer, A. L. Piro and R. Bondarescu, “Resonant Shattering of Neutron Star Crusts,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 011102 (2012) [arXiv:1110.0467 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2012 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Gravitational waves from f-modes excited by the inspiral of highly eccentric neutron star binaries,

    C. Chirenti, R. Gold and M. C. Miller, “Gravitational waves from f-modes excited by the inspiral of highly eccentric neutron star binaries,” Astrophys. J. 837, no.1, 67 (2017) [arXiv:1612.07097 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2017 arXiv

  68. [76]

    CoRoT measures solar-like oscillations and granulation 13 in stars hotter than the Sun,

    E. Michel, A. Baglin, M. Auvergne, C. Catala and R. Samadi, “CoRoT measures solar-like oscillations and granulation 13 in stars hotter than the Sun,” Science 322, 558-560 (2008) [arXiv:0812.1267 [astro-ph]]

    2008 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Red-giant seismic properties analyzed with CoRoT,

    B. Mosser, K. Belkacem, M. J. Goupil, A. Miglio, T. Morel, C. Barban, F. Baudin, S. Hekker, R. Samadi and J. De Ridder, et al. “Red-giant seismic properties analyzed with CoRoT,” Astron. Astrophys. 517, A22 (2010) [arXiv:1004.0449 [astro- ph.SR]]

    2010 arXiv

  70. [78]

    The universal red-giant oscillation pattern: an automated determination with CoRoT data,

    B. Mosser, K. Belkacem, M. J. Goupil, E. Michel, Y. Elsworth, C. Barban, T. Kallinger, S. Hekker, J. DeRidder and R. Samadi, et al. “The universal red-giant oscillation pattern: an automated determination with CoRoT data,” Astron. Astrophys. 525, L9 (2011) [arXiv:1011.1928 [as...

    2011 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Asteroseismology of the Kepler field DBV White Dwarf - It’s a hot one!,

    A. Bischoff-Kim and R. H. Østensen, “Asteroseismology of the Kepler field DBV White Dwarf - It’s a hot one!,” Astrophys. J. Lett. 742, L16 (2011) [arXiv:1110.2803 [astro-ph.SR]]

    2011 arXiv

  72. [80]

    ω2r(1 +ρ/P )eλ−ν− 4P′(r) P − 8π(P +ρ)reλ +r(P′(r))2 P (P +ρ) # +η

    and the Einstein Telescope [81]. These detections could give us information related to neutron star masses, frequencies, tidal Love numbers, amplitudes of the modes, damping times, and moments of inertia. Upon comparison between accumulated experimental and observational data ...

  73. [81]

    A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,

    M. Evans, R. X. Adhikari, C. Afle, S. W. Ballmer, S. Biscoveanu, S. Borhanian, D. A. Brown, Y. Chen, R. Eisenstein and A. Gruson, et al. “A Horizon Study for Cosmic Explorer: Science, Observatories, and Community,” [arXiv:2109.09882 [astro-ph.IM]]

    arXiv

  74. [82]

    The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,

    M. Punturo, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, B. Allen, N. Andersson, K. Arun, F. Barone, B. Barr, M. Barsuglia and M. Beker, et al. “The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,” Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 194002 (2010)

    2010

  75. [83]

    Tolman IV solution in the Randall-Sundrum Braneworld,

    J. Ovalle and F. Linares, “Tolman IV solution in the Randall-Sundrum Braneworld,” Phys. Rev. D 88, no.10, 104026 (2013) [arXiv:1311.1844 [gr-qc]]

    2013 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Static solutions of Einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid,

    R. C. Tolman, “Static solutions of Einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid,” Phys. Rev. 55, 364-373 (1939)

    1939

  77. [85]

    On massive neutron cores,

    J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff, “On massive neutron cores,” Phys. Rev. 55, 374-381 (1939)

    1939

  78. [86]

    On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory,

    K. Schwarzschild, “On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory,” Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. ) 1916, 189-196 (1916) [arXiv:physics/9905030 [physics]]

    1916 arXiv

  79. [87]

    A singularity-free solution for a charged fluid sphere in general relativity,

    J. Barua and K. D. Krori, “A singularity-free solution for a charged fluid sphere in general relativity,” J. Phys. A 8, no.4, 508 (1975)

    1975

  80. [88]

    The stability of relativistic stars and the role of the adiabatic index,

    C. C. Moustakidis, “The stability of relativistic stars and the role of the adiabatic index,” Gen. Rel. Grav. 49, no.5, 68 (2017) [arXiv:1612.01726 [gr-qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  81. [89]

    S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis, The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time , Cambridge University Press, 2023

    2023

  82. [90]

    R. M. Wald, General Relativity, Chicago University Press, 1984

    1984

  83. [91]

    V. P. Frolov and I. D. Novikov, Black hole physics: Basic concepts and new developments

  84. [92]

    Quark stars with isotropic matter in Hoˇ rava gravity and Einstein–æther theory,

    G. Panotopoulos, D. Vernieri and I. Lopes, “Quark stars with isotropic matter in Hoˇ rava gravity and Einstein–æther theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C 80, no.6, 537 (2020) [arXiv:2006.07652 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Regular Charged Black Holes, Energy Conditions, and Quasinormal Modes,

    L. Balart, G. Panotopoulos and ´A. Rinc´ on, “Regular Charged Black Holes, Energy Conditions, and Quasinormal Modes,” Fortsch. Phys. 71, no.12, 2300075 (2023) [arXiv:2309.01910 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  86. [94]

    The final phase of inspiral of strange quark star binaries,

    D. Gondek-Rosinska and F. Limousin, “The final phase of inspiral of strange quark star binaries,” [arXiv:0801.4829 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  87. [95]

    Can very compact and very massive neutron stars both exist?,

    A. Drago, A. Lavagno and G. Pagliara, “Can very compact and very massive neutron stars both exist?,” Phys. Rev. D 89, no.4, 043014 (2014) [arXiv:1309.7263 [nucl-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  88. [96]

    The scenario of two families of compact stars: 1. Equations of state, mass-radius relations and binary systems,

    A. Drago, A. Lavagno, G. Pagliara and D. Pigato, “The scenario of two families of compact stars: 1. Equations of state, mass-radius relations and binary systems,” Eur. Phys. J. A 52, no.2, 40 (2016) [arXiv:1509.02131 [astro-ph.SR]]

    2016 arXiv

  89. [97]

    The scenario of two families of compact stars: 2. Transition from hadronic to quark matter and explosive phenomena,

    A. Drago and G. Pagliara, “The scenario of two families of compact stars: 2. Transition from hadronic to quark matter and explosive phenomena,” Eur. Phys. J. A 52, no.2, 41 (2016) [arXiv:1509.02134 [astro-ph.SR]]

    2016 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Stellar Modeling via the Tolman IV Solution: The Cases of the Massive Pulsar J0740+6620 and the HESS J1731-347 Compact Object,

    G. Panotopoulos, “Stellar Modeling via the Tolman IV Solution: The Cases of the Massive Pulsar J0740+6620 and the HESS J1731-347 Compact Object,” Universe 10, no.9, 342 (2024) [arXiv:2408.15422 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Radial oscillations of zero-temperature white dwarfs and neutron stars below nuclear densities,

    G. Chanmugan, “Radial oscillations of zero-temperature white dwarfs and neutron stars below nuclear densities,” ApJ, 217, 799 (1977)

    1977

  92. [100]

    Radial oscillations of neutron stars and strange stars,

    H. M. V¨ ath, G. Chanmugan, “Radial oscillations of neutron stars and strange stars,” Astron. Astrophys.260, 250 (1992)

    1992

  93. [101]

    Tidal deformability and radial oscillations of anisotropic polytropic spheres,

    J. D. V. Arba˜ nil and G. Panotopoulos, “Tidal deformability and radial oscillations of anisotropic polytropic spheres,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.2, 024008 (2022) [arXiv:2112.09729 [gr-qc]]

    2022 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Asymptotic approximations for stellar nonradial pulsations,

    M. Tassoul, “Asymptotic approximations for stellar nonradial pulsations,” ApJS, 43, 469 (1980)

    1980

  95. [103]

    Asteroseismology of Solar-Type and Red-Giant Stars,

    W. J. Chaplin and A. Miglio, “Asteroseismology of Solar-Type and Red-Giant Stars,” Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 51, 353 (2013) [arXiv:1303.1957 [astro-ph.SR]]

    2013 arXiv

  96. [104]

    The impact of composition choices on solar evolution: age, helio- and asteroseismology, and neutrinos,

    D. Capelo and I. Lopes, “The impact of composition choices on solar evolution: age, helio- and asteroseismology, and neutrinos,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 498, no.2, 1992-2000 (2020) [arXiv:2010.01686 [astro-ph.SR]]

    2020 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Quark models and radial oscillations: decoding the HESS J1731-347 compact object’s equation of state,

    I. A. Rather, G. Panotopoulos and I. Lopes, “Quark models and radial oscillations: decoding the HESS J1731-347 compact object’s equation of state,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83, no.11, 1065 (2023) [arXiv:2307.03703 [astro-ph.HE]]

    2023 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Modeling compact objects with quark matter and dark energy: A comparative study of the radial oscillation modes of HESS J1731-347 and PSR J0740+6620,

    C. Sep´ ulveda and G. Panotopoulos, “Modeling compact objects with quark matter and dark energy: A comparative study of the radial oscillation modes of HESS J1731-347 and PSR J0740+6620,” Chin. J. Phys. 91, 773-783 (2024)

    2024

  99. [107]

    Constraints on the Dense Matter Equation of State and Neutron Star Properties from NICER’s Mass–Radius Estimate of PSR J0740+6620 and Multimessenger Observations,

    G. Raaijmakers, S. K. Greif, K. Hebeler, T. Hinderer, S. Nissanke, A. Schwenk, T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, J. M. Lattimer and W. C. G. Ho, “Constraints on the Dense Matter Equation of State and Neutron Star Properties from NICER’s Mass–Radius Estimate of PSR J0740+6620 and Multi...

    2021 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Nuclear Physics Multimessenger Astrophysics Constraints on the Neutron Star Equation of State: Adding NICER’s PSR J0740+6620 Measurement,

    P. T. H. Pang, I. Tews, M. W. Coughlin, M. Bulla, C. Van Den Broeck and T. Dietrich, “Nuclear Physics Multimessenger Astrophysics Constraints on the Neutron Star Equation of State: Adding NICER’s PSR J0740+6620 Measurement,” Astrophys. J. 922, no.1, 14 (2021) [arXiv:2105.08688...

    2021 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Neutron-star measurements in the multi-messenger Era,

    S. Ascenzi, V. Graber and N. Rea, “Neutron-star measurements in the multi-messenger Era,” Astropart. Phys. 158, 102935 (2024) [arXiv:2401.14930 [astro-ph.HE]]. 15 Linear Non-linear HESS 0 5 10 15 200.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 R[km] M[Msun] Karmarkar Tolman MIT HESS 6 8 10 12 14 0....

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.