Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 25 references

Learning a General Model: Folding Clothing with Topological Dynamics

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a topological graph of a garment's visible creases, sleeves, and folds can support a learned dynamics model that folds complex jackets, even with self-occlusion.

desk verdict A genuinely new topological representation for garment state, paired with a plausible pipeline, but the 'general' claim rests on an untested sim-to-real assumption and almost no quantitative real-world evaluation. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.20720 v1 pith:F5SAAOW2 submitted 2025-04-29 cs.RO cs.CV

Yiming Liu , Lijun Han , Enlin Gu , Hesheng Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.ROcs.CV
keywords clothingmanipulationtopologicalgraphneuralnetworkdeformableobjectself-occlusionJacobiancontrolrobotfoldingsim-to-realtransfer
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The authors set out to make clothing folding tractable by replacing the garment's enormous physical state with a small topological graph. They argue that the visible folding structure—crease endpoints, region corners, and sleeve axes—captures the constraints that actually govern how cloth moves. Using this graph, a graph neural network learns a general deformation model from simulated folding data, and the model's Jacobian drives a feedback controller that executes the fold. The paper reports real-robot experiments folding jackets, including configurations where sleeves occlude the body, supporting the claim of generality.

What carries the argument

The central object is the topological graph $\langle V,E\rangle$, whose nodes come in three types: region vertices ($N_0$), crease endpoints ($N_1$), and sleeve-axis samples ($N_2$). Each node stores position, velocity, height above the folding plane, type, and the center of its fabric region, while edges connect nodes along region contours and carry features that describe outline deformation. The graph is generated by iterative keypoint detection and occlusion-layer semantic segmentation, and is kept current during manipulation by a corrective graph neural network and a predictive graph neural network. The mechanism that turns learning into control is the deformation Jacobian $J_f$, obtained by backpropagating through the predictive model and inserted into the controller $v_r = k_v (J_f^T J_f)^\dagger J_f^T \frac{d}{d\tau}s_f(\tau)$.

What would settle it

Measure the one-step predictive error of the graph neural network on a real jacket during the lifting phase by comparing predicted node positions with the tracked node positions; if the mean error exceeds the width of the jacket sleeve, the Jacobian controller would be planning from states that no longer match the cloth, and the claimed generality would fail.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a garment's folding state can be represented by a low-dimensional heterogeneous graph, and that the dynamics of this graph can be learned and controlled without modeling every thread. The graph is extracted from a single RGB image by detecting keypoints and semantically segmenting occlusive layers, which lets the method reconstruct the connected clothing parts even when one layer hides another. Two graph neural networks—a corrective model and a predictive model—update the graph state during manipulation, and backpropagation through the predictive model yields a deformation Jacobian used for feedback control. The authors validate the full pipeline on a physical robot folding jackets from several initial configurations, including a self-occluded case.

Load-bearing premise

The whole approach rests on the assumption that cloth behaviour in simulation matches cloth behaviour in reality well enough that a dynamics model trained only on simulated topological graphs can predict real fabric deformation without retraining or domain adaptation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the model is general, the same learned dynamics can fold a jacket from any initial configuration from which the topological graph can be extracted, without retraining.
  • Because the state is a low-dimensional graph rather than a mesh, model-based cloth control becomes computationally light enough to run on a laptop GPU in real time.
  • The method removes the need for a predefined clothing template, so it should extend to other structured garments (shirts, cardigans) once the keypoint and segmentation networks are trained on them.
  • The same Jacobian-based feedback loop could be applied to other deformable-object tasks, such as unfolding or hanging, as long as the topological graph can be defined.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The topological graph's dependence on visible creases suggests the method may degrade on garments with many wrinkles or very flexible fabrics where the crease structure is not stable; an obvious test is to vary fabric stiffness and wrinkle density.
  • A stronger validation of the 'general' claim would be to report quantitative success rates over many jacket configurations rather than the two illustrative examples shown.
  • The same graph-dynamics idea could be applied to other articulated soft objects, such as bags or tents, where a small set of semantic nodes and occlusion relations defines the relevant state.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an end-to-end framework for folding complex garments, centered on a low-dimensional topological graph representation of clothing state. The graph is constructed from RGB observations by combining ViTPose keypoint detection, Mask2Former occlusion-aware semantic segmentation, and two hand-defined occlusion decomposition rules. A GNN-based forward dynamics model and a corrective model are trained on topological graphs extracted from meshes in a PyBullet dataset, and the predictive model's Jacobian is used in a feedback controller to execute multi-stage folding. Experiments on a real Franka Research 3 platform with jackets show qualitative perception outputs and two image sequences of folding; the dynamics model reports a single validation MSE of 0.017. The central claim is that this constitutes a general model capable of recognizing and folding complex clothing with self-occlusion.

Significance. If the claims were fully substantiated, the topological graph representation would be a valuable step toward reducing the dimensionality of deformable-object state for manipulation, and the combination of occlusion-aware perception, learned graph dynamics, and Jacobian-based control is sensible and coherent. The paper also makes a falsifiable prediction—sim-to-real transfer of the learned dynamics—which is, however, never tested. The contribution is potentially significant for cloth manipulation, but the current evidence is predominantly qualitative: perception results are illustrative, the dynamics model is validated by a single simulation number, and the folding demonstrations are two sequences without success-rate statistics, error bars, or ablations. The strengths are the novel graph formulation, the integration of perception/dynamics/control, and the demonstration on a real robot; the main weakness is the absence of quantitative validation of the load-bearing sim-to-real and perception-to-graph steps.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section IV-C and Eq. (5)] The central claim of a general model rests on the assertion in Section IV-C that 'models trained in simulation are expected to exhibit similar performance in real-world applications,' but this expectation is never tested. The GNN is trained on topological graphs extracted directly from garment meshes in a PyBullet dataset, whereas at inference the graphs come from ViTPose keypoints, Mask2Former segmentation, and the hand-crafted occlusion rules of Section III-B. These are different input distributions in both graph topology and feature statistics, and the physical dynamics of real fabric are not guaranteed to match the simulator. Because the Jacobian controller in Eq. (9) is the gradient of the learned predictive model, a systematic sim-to-real gap would produce incorrect planned trajectories. The paper reports no real-world prediction error, no comparison of graph feature distributions, and no sim-to-real adaptation; without such evidence, the folding demos in Fig. 7 cannot support the claimed generality.
  2. [Section IV-C, Fig. 7] The quantitative evaluation of the dynamics model is a single validation MSE of 0.017 on an unspecified subset of the GarmentTracking dataset. No standard deviation across seeds, per-node or per-edge error, ablation of the region-aggregation term in Eq. (5), or comparison against a standard GNN or another dynamics baseline is reported. The corrective model ffeedback (Eq. 4) is never evaluated in isolation. Consequently, the claimed improvement of the message-passing mechanism and the 'general dynamics' of the topological graph are not substantiated; the low MSE could reflect memorization of simulation-specific patterns rather than a general cloth model. The authors should provide a rigorous evaluation with ablations, baselines, and error decomposition.
  3. [Section III-B, Fig. 6] The folding validation consists of two image sequences. The success criterion defined in Section III ('area of clothing smaller than a specified threshold') is never operationalized or reported, and no success rate, error bars, or repeated trials are given. The two demos do not include a baseline controller (e.g., an open-loop lifting-placing strategy without the learned Jacobian), so it is impossible to determine whether the outcome is due to the learned dynamics model or to the generic pick-and-place pattern. To support the central claim, the authors should report a quantitative success rate over multiple starting configurations, measured final garment area, and a comparison against a non-predictive or open-loop baseline.
  4. [Section IV-A] The topological graph extraction relies on hand-defined occlusion decomposition rules and the keypoint detection threshold in Eq. (3), but no quantitative metrics are provided for graph extraction accuracy. The comparison with 'traditional semantic keypoint detection' in Fig. 6 is qualitative only; there is no precision/recall for keypoint detection, no graph-structure accuracy (e.g., correct edge connectivity), and no failure-rate analysis across the 280-image dataset. Because graph extraction errors directly propagate into the dynamics model and the controller, the claim that the representation can be robustly extracted from self-occluded garments needs quantitative validation.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (1)] In Eq. (1), G0 is used both as the initial graph and as the observation-to-graph mapping function; please disambiguate these two uses.
  2. [Section III-A, Eq. (5)] The phrase 'li is the number of the region that vi belongs to' is ambiguous; please specify whether li is the number of nodes in the region and correct the wording accordingly.
  3. [Section IV-C] The name 'Cotracker' is used inconsistently with 'CoTracker3' in the text and in reference [23]; please use a single consistent name.
  4. [Section III-B, Eq. (3)] There is a missing space in 'wherekh is a positive coefficient'; please correct this typographical issue.
  5. [Section III-D] The expected trajectory for the lifting stage is described verbally as 'circles about the crease,' but the geometric construction (e.g., how the circle center and radius are chosen) is not specified; an equation or figure would improve reproducibility.
  6. [Section IV-A] The assumption that the gripper can stably grasp all layers of the clothing is strong and is not validated in the experiments; it should be discussed as a limitation of the current work.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the learned dynamics is trained on external simulated graphs and evaluated against an external area threshold.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The topological graph representation is defined from geometric and perceptual quantities (keypoints, creases, occlusion layers, contours) in Sec. III-A and III-B, and the GNN dynamics models are trained on an external PyBullet garment-folding dataset (reference [12]) using graphs extracted directly from simulated meshes (Sec. IV-C). The predictive model is then evaluated by validation MSE (0.017) on that simulation split, and the real-world controller uses the model's Jacobian (Eq. 9) to follow trajectories whose success is judged by an external area threshold stated in Sec. III. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: the corrective model refines perceptually incomplete edge features, but it is trained with supervised simulation data and is not fitted to the real-world folding outcome. There are no load-bearing self-citations; the cited prior works are external baselines or standard toolkits, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' own work is invoked to force the chosen representation. The main caveat is the explicitly stated expectation that simulation-trained models transfer to reality (Sec. IV-C), but that is an unvalidated empirical assumption about sim-to-real generalization, not a circular reduction of the paper's equations or definitions to their own outputs. Therefore, no circular step can be exhibited from the paper's text, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central system relies on hand-crafted constants and learned network weights; the latter are fitted to simulation data, and no artifacts are released. The main axioms are the sufficiency of the topological graph, the validity of the occlusion rules, the sim-to-real transfer, and the stable-grasp assumption. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • kh (mask decay coefficient) = not disclosed
    Controls the suppression of already-found keypoints in Eq. 3; hand-set, changes how many nodes are extracted.
  • Keypoint detection threshold = not disclosed
    Heatmap maximum must exceed this value to accept a keypoint; hand-set threshold affects graph completeness.
  • dp (gripping distance threshold) = not disclosed
    Determines which graph node receives the robot position when the gripper closes (Eq. 4); hand-set.
  • kv (velocity coefficient) = not disclosed
    Scales the Jacobian controller in Eq. 9; hand-set gain.
  • GNN/MLP weights = not released; trained on PyBullet dataset
    Learned parameters of all encoders, processors, and decoders; the paper reports only a validation MSE of 0.017 and provides no weights.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper The topological graph preserves the motion constraints of a garment during folding.
    Sec. III-A asserts that the graph 'indicates the constraints of clothing and enables predictions', but no proof, ablation, or state-reconstruction experiment tests whether the representation is sufficient.
  • domain assumption Simulation-trained dynamics transfer to real fabric without additional adaptation.
    Sec. IV-C states this expectation directly and no real-world predictive error is measured; the two folding demos are insufficient to establish transfer.
  • ad hoc to paper The two occlusion-decomposition rules in Sec. III-B correctly identify garment parts in all tested configurations.
    These hand-crafted rules (intersection with convex hull, crease-node proximity) are validated only qualitatively on a small image set, with no failure-rate measurement.
  • domain assumption The gripper stably grasps all layers of clothing during manipulation.
    Sec. IV-A explicitly states this assumption, removing gripper slip from consideration even though fabric multi-layer grasp is a known failure source.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Learning a General Model: Folding Clothing with Topological Dynamics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F5SAAOW2

@misc{pith2026250420720,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Learning a General Model: Folding Clothing with Topological Dynamics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F5SAAOW2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.20720}
}
read the original abstract

The high degrees of freedom and complex structure of garments present significant challenges for clothing manipulation. In this paper, we propose a general topological dynamics model to fold complex clothing. By utilizing the visible folding structure as the topological skeleton, we design a novel topological graph to represent the clothing state. This topological graph is low-dimensional and applied for complex clothing in various folding states. It indicates the constraints of clothing and enables predictions regarding clothing movement. To extract graphs from self-occlusion, we apply semantic segmentation to analyze the occlusion relationships and decompose the clothing structure. The decomposed structure is then combined with keypoint detection to generate the topological graph. To analyze the behavior of the topological graph, we employ an improved Graph Neural Network (GNN) to learn the general dynamics. The GNN model can predict the deformation of clothing and is employed to calculate the deformation Jacobi matrix for control. Experiments using jackets validate the algorithm's effectiveness to recognize and fold complex clothing with self-occlusion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.20720 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. We propose a new topology-based representation of clothing states. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview. (a) In the workspace, an RGB image observation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The process to construct the topological graph. (a) The observation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The refined trajectory in lifting stage. The dashed green arc is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The snapshots of our clothing folding methods. Four sequential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The results of perception and topological graph generation. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fast simulation of mass-spring systems,

    T. Liu, A. W. Bargteil, J. F. O’Brien, and L. Kavan, “Fast simulation of mass-spring systems,” ACM Transactions on Graphics , vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1–7, Nov. 2013

    work page 2013

  2. [2]

    Towards clothes hanging via cloth simulation and deep convolutional networks,

    D. Est ´evez, J. G. Victores, R. Fernandez-Fernandez, and C. Balaguer, “Towards clothes hanging via cloth simulation and deep convolutional networks,” Simul. Notes Eur ., vol. 31, pp. 169–176, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Flingflow: Llm- driven dynamic strategies for efficient cloth flattening,

    T. Fu, C. Li, J. Liu, F. Li, C. Wang, and R. Song, “Flingflow: Llm- driven dynamic strategies for efficient cloth flattening,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 8714–8721, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Adafold: Adapting folding trajectories of cloths via feedback-loop manipula- tion,

    A. Longhini, M. C. Welle, Z. Erickson, and D. Kragic, “Adafold: Adapting folding trajectories of cloths via feedback-loop manipula- tion,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 9183– 9190, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Reactive human–robot collaborative manipulation of deformable linear objects using a new topological latent control model,

    P. Zhou, P. Zheng, J. Qi, C. Li, H.-Y . Lee, A. Duan, L. Lu, Z. Li, L. Hu, and D. Navarro-Alarcon, “Reactive human–robot collaborative manipulation of deformable linear objects using a new topological latent control model,” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufactur- ing, vol. 88, p. 102727, Aug. 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Folding deformable objects using predictive simulation and trajectory opti- mization,

    Y . Li, Y . Yue, D. Xu, E. Grinspun, and P. K. Allen, “Folding deformable objects using predictive simulation and trajectory opti- mization,” in 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 2015, pp. 6000–6006

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Development and Control of Robot Hand with Finger Camera for Garment Handling Tasks,

    H. Kondo, J. V . S. Luces, and Y . Hirata, “Development and Control of Robot Hand with Finger Camera for Garment Handling Tasks,” in 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2022, pp. 8940–8947

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Deepfashion: Powering robust clothes recognition and retrieval with rich annotations,

    Z. Liu, P. Luo, S. Qiu, X. Wang, and X. Tang, “Deepfashion: Powering robust clothes recognition and retrieval with rich annotations,” in Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , June 2016

    work page 2016

Show all 25 references
  1. [9]

    Attentive Fashion Grammar Network for Fashion Landmark Detection and Clothing Category Classification,

    W. Wang, Y . Xu, J. Shen, and S.-C. Zhu, “Attentive Fashion Grammar Network for Fashion Landmark Detection and Clothing Category Classification,” in 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . IEEE, 2018, pp. 4271–4280

    2018

  2. [10]

    Cloth manipulation based on category classification and landmark detection,

    O. Gustavsson, T. Ziegler, M. C. Welle, J. B ¨utepage, A. Varava, and D. Kragic, “Cloth manipulation based on category classification and landmark detection,” International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, p. 17298806221110445, 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    GarmentNets: Category-Level Pose Estimation for Garments via Canonical Space Shape Completion,

    C. Chi and S. Song, “GarmentNets: Category-Level Pose Estimation for Garments via Canonical Space Shape Completion,” in 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) . IEEE, 2021, pp. 3304–3313

    2021

  4. [12]

    GarmentTracking: Category-Level Garment Pose Tracking,

    H. Xue, W. Xu, J. Zhang, T. Tang, Y . Li, W. Du, R. Ye, and C. Lu, “GarmentTracking: Category-Level Garment Pose Tracking,” in 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, 2023, pp. 21 233–21 242

    2023

  5. [13]

    Learning to Manipulate Deformable Objects without Demonstrations,

    Y . Wu, W. Yan, T. Kurutach, L. Pinto, and P. Abbeel, “Learning to Manipulate Deformable Objects without Demonstrations,” inRobotics: Science and Systems XVI . Robotics: Science and Systems Foundation, 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    Learning Vi- sual Feedback Control for Dynamic Cloth Folding,

    J. Hietala, D. Blanco–Mulero, G. Alcan, and V . Kyrki, “Learning Vi- sual Feedback Control for Dynamic Cloth Folding,” in 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 2022, pp. 1455–1462

    2022

  7. [15]

    Learning Dense Visual Correspondences in Simulation to Smooth and Fold Real Fabrics,

    A. Ganapathi, P. Sundaresan, B. Thananjeyan, A. Balakrishna, D. Seita, J. Grannen, M. Hwang, R. Hoque, J. E. Gonzalez, N. Ja- mali, K. Yamane, S. Iba, and K. Goldberg, “Learning Dense Visual Correspondences in Simulation to Smooth and Fold Real Fabrics,” in 2021 IEEE Internati...

    2021

  8. [16]

    Unified particle physics for real-time applications,

    M. Macklin, M. M ¨uller, N. Chentanez, and T.-Y . Kim, “Unified particle physics for real-time applications,” ACM Transactions on Graphics , vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1–12, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    Latent Space Roadmap for Visual Action Planning of Deformable and Rigid Object Manipulation,

    M. Lippi, P. Poklukar, M. C. Welle, A. Varava, H. Yin, A. Marino, and D. Kragic, “Latent Space Roadmap for Visual Action Planning of Deformable and Rigid Object Manipulation,” in 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 2020, pp. ...

    2020

  10. [18]

    MuJoCo: A physics engine for model-based control,

    E. Todorov, T. Erez, and Y . Tassa, “MuJoCo: A physics engine for model-based control,” in 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems . IEEE, 2012, pp. 5026–5033

    2012

  11. [19]

    VisuoSpatial Fore- sight for physical sequential fabric manipulation,

    R. Hoque, D. Seita, A. Balakrishna, A. Ganapathi, A. K. Tanwani, N. Jamali, K. Yamane, S. Iba, and K. Goldberg, “VisuoSpatial Fore- sight for physical sequential fabric manipulation,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 175–199, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    MeshGraphNetRP: Improving Generalization of GNN-based Cloth Simulation,

    E. I. Libao, M. Lee, S. Kim, and S.-H. Lee, “MeshGraphNetRP: Improving Generalization of GNN-based Cloth Simulation,” in ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Motion, Interaction and Games . ACM, 2023, pp. 1–7

    2023

  13. [21]

    ViTPose: Simple vision transformer baselines for human pose estimation,

    Y . Xu, J. Zhang, Q. Zhang, and D. Tao, “ViTPose: Simple vision transformer baselines for human pose estimation,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    Per-pixel classification is not all you need for semantic segmentation,

    B. Cheng, A. G. Schwing, and A. Kirillov, “Per-pixel classification is not all you need for semantic segmentation,” in NeurIPS, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Cotracker3: Simpler and better point tracking by pseudo-labelling real videos,

    N. Karaev, I. Makarov, J. Wang, N. Neverova, A. Vedaldi, and C. Rupprecht, “Cotracker3: Simpler and better point tracking by pseudo-labelling real videos,” in Proc. arXiv:2410.11831, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Learning to simulate complex physics with graph networks,

    A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, J. Godwin, T. Pfaff, R. Ying, J. Leskovec, and P. W. Battaglia, “Learning to simulate complex physics with graph networks,” in International Conference on Machine Learning , 2020

    2020

  17. [25]

    FlingBot: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Dynamic Manipulation for Cloth Unfolding,

    H. Ha and S. Song, “FlingBot: The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Dynamic Manipulation for Cloth Unfolding,” in Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Robot Learning . PMLR, Jan. 2022, pp. 24–33

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.