REVIEW 4 cited by
SAGA: A Security Architecture for Governing AI Agentic Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents increasingly interact, collaborate, and delegate tasks to one another autonomously with minimal human interaction. Industry guidelines for agentic system governance emphasize the need for users to maintain comprehensive control over their agents, mitigating potential damage from malicious agents. Several proposed agentic system designs address agent identity, authorization, and delegation, but remain purely theoretical, without concrete implementation and evaluation. Most importantly, they do not provide user-controlled agent management. To address this gap, we propose SAGA, a scalable Security Architecture for Governing Agentic systems, that offers user oversight over their agents' lifecycle. In our design, users register their agents with a central entity, the Provider, that maintains agent contact information, user-defined access control policies, and helps agents enforce these policies on inter-agent communication. We introduce a cryptographic mechanism for deriving access control tokens, that offers fine-grained control over an agent's interaction with other agents, providing formal security guarantees. We evaluate SAGA on several agentic tasks, using agents in different geolocations, and multiple on-device and cloud LLMs, demonstrating minimal performance overhead with no impact on underlying task utility in a wide range of conditions. Our architecture enables secure and trustworthy deployment of autonomous agents, accelerating the responsible adoption of this technology in sensitive environments.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Like a Hammer, It Can Build, It Can Break: Large Language Model Uses, Perceptions, and Adoption in Cybersecurity Operations on Reddit
Security practitioners use LLMs independently for low-risk productivity tasks while showing interest in enterprise platforms, but reliability, verification needs, and security risks limit broader autonomy.
-
Hardware Keystores for AI Agent Signing Workflows: A Zero-Trust MCP Enforcement Architecture
Hardware key confinement plus a SHA-256 payload commitment and an LLM judge blocked all 12 tested prompt-injection signing attacks and prevented key exfiltration in the protected setup.
-
Detailed analysis of possible new-physics effects in the semileptonic decay $B_s \to D_s^{(*)}\tau\bar{\nu}$
Constraints on beyond-SM Wilson coefficients in B_s → D_s(*) τ ν̄ are derived from data using covariant-quark-model form factors, with full observable predictions for future experiments.
-
Vibe Coding vs. Agentic Coding: Fundamentals and Practical Implications of Agentic AI
A qualitative taxonomy positions vibe coding and agentic coding as complementary paradigms rather than rivals in AI-assisted software development.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.