REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 7 cited by
Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 3, Civil Engineering, Implementation and Sustainability
T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read The FCC's 90.6 km tunnel can be built with conventional, proven construction techniques, the feasibility report argues.
desk verdict A thorough, self-aware engineering feasibility report whose central claim is plausible but explicitly rides on geological data still being collected. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing mechanism is the iterative placement-optimization loop the report calls 'avoid-reduce-compensate': each candidate layout is tested against subsurface geology, surface territorial constraints, cost, and schedule, then revised to reduce impacts. The physical carrier is the 3D subsurface model of the Geneva basin, which keeps the tunnel predominantly in watertight molasse and limits unavoidable limestone crossing to about 4.4 km; the TBM drive pattern, with twin drives starting from four access points, and the 5.5 m internal diameter single-pass precast lining carry the construction-method claims.
What would settle it
Compare the processed phase-1 borehole logs and seismic sections against the 3D geological model: if the molasse-limestone interface under the Jura and Vuache sections is found shallower than modeled, or if karstic voids appear outside the predicted 4.4 km Mandallaz section, the feasibility claim is falsified.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that the civil engineering for the FCC-ee can be constructed using existing, proven techniques: a single 90.6 km accelerator tunnel at depths up to 560 m, twelve permanent shafts with the deepest at 400 m, detector caverns up to 66 m by 35 m by 35 m, plus service caverns, klystron galleries, alcoves, and bypass tunnels. The report states that the current design demonstrates technical feasibility, supported by consultations with tunnelling contractors, a TBM manufacturer, and a shaft-sinking specialist. It further claims a positive benefit-cost ratio for the FCC-ee under the most conservative and stringent conditions considered, and presents the 'avoid-reduce-compensate' iteration as the mechanism that balanced physics performance, territorial compatibility, risk, and cost.
Load-bearing premise
The baseline assumes the tunnel can be placed predominantly in watertight molasse rock, with only a 4.4 km limestone section; if the ongoing subsurface investigations find more karstic limestone, water-bearing moraine, or major faults than modeled, the alignment, construction method, cost, and schedule would all have to change.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- The 90.6 km tunnel, twelve permanent shafts, and eight surface sites can move into detailed design and costing on the stated baseline; no new excavation technology is required.
- FCC-ee's positive benefit-cost ratio under conservative assumptions makes economic viability a defensible input to the next particle-physics strategy decision.
- The staged civil engineering plan means larger FCC-hh detector caverns and beam-absorber tunnels can be deferred, with space reserved, avoiding costly demolition and re-excavation later.
- Excavated molasse can be treated as a regional resource rather than waste, but this depends on cross-border agreements between the two host states on spoil sharing and transport.
- The ongoing subsurface investigation campaign will confirm or refine the assumed 4.4 km limestone crossing, directly affecting cost and schedule confidence.
Reading between the lines
- A testable extension: if the phase-1 boreholes' preliminary indication that the Mandallaz limestone is narrower than modeled holds, the high-risk 4.4 km section and its schedule contingency could shrink, lowering cost; the report stops short of claiming this.
- The public release of borehole logs and the 3D geological model will let outside engineers independently pressure-test the feasibility claim, since that model underpins the cost and schedule estimates.
- The 'avoid-reduce-compensate' loop is transferable to other deep-infrastructure projects: the dominant cost lever is not the excavation machines but placing the tunnel in watertight geology, which is precisely what the loop formalizes.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. This volume of the FCC Feasibility Study Report presents the civil-engineering baseline, territorial implementation, environmental studies, and sustainability assessment for the proposed Future Circular Collider. It describes a 90.6 km accelerator tunnel with an internal diameter of 5.5 m, twelve permanent shafts, eight surface sites, TBM-based excavation predominantly in molasse rock, a 4.4 km limestone section at Mandallaz, a staged construction approach, management of about 6.3 million cubic metres of excavated material, and a socio-economic evaluation that claims a positive benefit-cost ratio for the FCC-ee stage under conservative assumptions. The report states that the current design demonstrates technical feasibility, while explicitly noting that phase 1 of the subsurface site investigations is only about 40% complete and that the 3D geological model still has areas with little or no data.
Significance. If the central feasibility claim holds, this document is a major milestone for the European Strategy update: it provides a costed, schedule-aware, testable baseline for a 90 km-class tunnel, with credible anchoring in external benchmarks (LEP and LHC experience, tunnelling-contractor consultations, the UK Halite project) and a detailed Product Breakdown Structure down to level 4. The report is commendably transparent about its main uncertainties, particularly the geological model and the ongoing site-investigation campaign, and it commits to making the updated 3D geological model and borehole logs publicly available. The explicit staging logic for underground and surface structures and the excavated-material strategy are further strengths that make the study amenable to external scrutiny and future validation.
major comments (3)
- [§1.1, §1.4, §1.4.2] The central claim that the civil-engineering design is technically feasible is load-bearing but is not yet fully supported because it rests on the assumption that the tunnel lies predominantly in watertight molasse with only 4.4 km of limestone. Section 1.4.2 admits that certain locations, such as the foot of the Bornes and Mandallaz outcrops, extend several kilometres without relevant geological data at the depths of the proposed infrastructure, and Section 1.4 states that phase 1 of the subsurface investigations is only about 40% complete. The report's own caveats—that further work is needed to reduce technical risks and that the molasse assumption should be confirmed with the completion of the ongoing site investigations—indicate that the feasibility demonstration is provisional. Because the TBM selection, advance rates, shaft construction methods, cost, and schedule all depend on the geological model, the feasibility claim should be explicitly conditional on the outcome of the campaign, or it should be accompanied by a quantitative sensitivity analysis showing how the conclusion would change if, for example, the karstic limestone or water-bearing moraine sections were longer than currently modelled.
- [§1.1.1, Table 1.2, §1.1.10] The assumed TBM advance rates (16 m/day average, reduced to 9 m/day in the Mandallaz limestone) and the choice of single-shield TBM are load-bearing parameters for the construction schedule and cost. The report does not provide a derivation of these values beyond citing the UK Halite project's 20 m/day, and it itself describes the Moutier tunnel case where a single-shield TBM became stuck after 190 m owing to unforeseen geology. To make the feasibility argument robust, the authors should either provide a quantitative sensitivity analysis around the advance-rate and machine-selection assumptions, or explicitly state that the feasibility conclusion is contingent on the ground conditions being confirmed by the phase 1 and phase 2 investigations and on the ability to switch to earth-pressure-balance or slurry TBMs and ground treatment if needed.
- [Abstract, §4.5] The abstract and Section 4.5 claim a positive benefit-cost ratio for the FCC-ee even under the most conservative and stringent conditions. This economic claim inherits the geological uncertainty because the cost and schedule inputs come from the civil-engineering baseline described in Chapter 1. If the benefit-cost analysis does not include a scenario with adverse geological outcomes—such as longer karstic limestone requiring ground treatment, additional water-bearing moraine crossings, or TBM delays—the label 'most conservative' is not supported. The manuscript should state explicitly which scenarios were included in the sensitivity analysis, or it should add such a scenario to demonstrate that the positive benefit-cost ratio persists when the geological assumptions are relaxed.
minor comments (3)
- [§1.1.9] In the description of the TBM drives, the sentence 'Therefore, the quantity of material extracted from PD is around 1.3 million m3' should refer to site PJ; the site label appears to be a typo.
- [§1.2.8] The sentence ending '...to ensure the aquifer is protected. . A simplified layout' contains a doubled period before the next sentence; please correct the punctuation.
- [§1.4.3] The introductory list of phase 1 investigation sections names the Rhône last, but the subsections present the Rhône after Vuache; reorder the list or the subsections for consistency.
Circularity Check
No circularity found: the feasibility claims are grounded in external benchmarks, third-party geological data, and independent contractor consultations, not in self-referential derivation.
full rationale
The report is an engineering feasibility study whose central claims are validated against external evidence: CERN's LEP and LHC construction experience, consultations with tunneling contractors and a European TBM manufacturer, a specialist shaft-sinking assessment, geophysical and borehole data from third parties such as the Canton de Genève GEothermies program, and collaboration with the University of Geneva on the 3D geological model. The statement that 'the current design demonstrates the technical feasibility of FCC civil engineering' is supported by these external inputs and by ongoing subsurface investigations, not by an equation that reduces to its own assumptions. The report explicitly identifies its own limitations, noting that phase 1 subsurface investigations are only about 40% complete and that 'there are still areas where further work needs to be done in order to reduce technical risks,' which is honest uncertainty rather than circularity. The socio-economic benefit-cost claim is presented as a result of a 'comprehensive socio-economic impact assessment' under 'the most conservative and stringent conditions,' and while the detailed cost-benefit model is not fully reproduced in the reviewed sections, nothing in the text indicates that the conclusion is defined into existence by the inputs. No fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citation, and no scientific derivation is shown to be equivalent to its inputs. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (2)
- TBM advance rate =
16 m/day nominal, 9 m/day in limestone
- Excavation expansion factor =
1.3
assumptions (3)
- domain assumption The geology along the alignment consists primarily of molasse, with limited limestone and moraine layers.
- domain assumption Existing conventional tunneling and shaft-sinking techniques are sufficient for depths up to 560 m and shafts to 400 m.
- domain assumption The staged construction of FCC-ee first, with FCC-hh later, is implementable.
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 3, Civil Engineering, Implementation and Sustainability." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EMVQBRFA
@misc{pith2026250500273,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 3, Civil Engineering, Implementation and Sustainability},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EMVQBRFA}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.00273}
}
read the original abstract
Volume 3 of the FCC Feasibility Report presents studies related to civil engineering, the development of a project implementation scenario, and environmental and sustainability aspects. The report details the iterative improvements made to the civil engineering concepts since 2018, taking into account subsurface conditions, accelerator and experiment requirements, and territorial considerations. It outlines a technically feasible and economically viable civil engineering configuration that serves as the baseline for detailed subsurface investigations, construction design, cost estimation, and project implementation planning. Additionally, the report highlights ongoing subsurface investigations in key areas to support the development of an improved 3D subsurface model of the region. The report describes development of the project scenario based on the 'avoid-reduce-compensate' iterative optimisation approach. The reference scenario balances optimal physics performance with territorial compatibility, implementation risks, and costs. Environmental field investigations covering almost 600 hectares of terrain - including numerous urban, economic, social, and technical aspects - confirmed the project's technical feasibility and contributed to the preparation of essential input documents for the formal project authorisation phase. The summary also highlights the initiation of public dialogue as part of the authorisation process. The results of a comprehensive socio-economic impact assessment, which included significant environmental effects, are presented. Even under the most conservative and stringent conditions, a positive benefit-cost ratio for the FCC-ee is obtained. Finally, the report provides a concise summary of the studies conducted to document the current state of the environment.
Figures
Figures from the paper (195 more)
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
Gravity-Aligned Vertical Electron-Positron Linear Collider
A gravity-aligned vertical e+e− linear collider in a ~3 km shaft is proposed as a compact Higgs-factory concept reusing KEK/SuperKEKB, contingent on >100 MV/m cryogenic normal-conducting gradients.
-
The Scaffold Effect: How Prompt Framing Drives Apparent Multimodal Gains in Clinical VLM Evaluation
Merely mentioning MRI availability in the prompt drives 70-80% of apparent multimodal F1 gains in clinical VLMs, even when no imaging is present.
-
Recoil-Safe Subtraction, Matching and Merging in e+e- to hadrons
The Alaric shower is matched to NLO matrix elements and merged to five jets in e+e- to hadrons, with new analytic subtraction terms validated against Catani-Seymour subtraction.
-
Counting b-jets at the FCC-ee as a probe of top-quark flavor physics
FCC-ee at 240 GeV can probe Λ_eff ∼ 7–13 TeV for scalar, vector and tensor eetu/eetc operators by counting b_P-odd single-b-jet multi-jet events.
-
All-charm tetraquarks at hadron colliders: A high-precision fragmentation perspective
TQ4Q2.0 supplies the first complete, uncertainty-quantified set of NRQCD-based fragmentation functions for all-heavy tetraquarks, including nonconstituent channels and public grids for jet-associated production.
-
Detector Requirements, Design, and Technologies for the FCC-ee Higgs, electroweak, and top factory
An overview of the detector performance requirements and of the four detector concepts under study for the FCC-ee collider.
-
BSM: Extended Scalar Sectors
An updated review chapter on extended scalar sectors, their constraints, dark matter and CP violation links, and future collider searches.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
L. Ulrici. Stratégie de gestion et d’usage des matériaux excavés (2025). https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.14923266
-
[2]
L. Ulrici. Excavated materials management and use strategy (2024).https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.13785651
2024
-
[3]
La gestion et l’emploi des matéri- aux excavés
Association français des tunnels et de l’espace souterrain. La gestion et l’emploi des matéri- aux excavés. GT35R1F2 (2017). URL https://www.aftes.fr/fr/product/la-gestion- et-lemploi-des-materiaux-excaves-gt35r1f2/
2017
-
[4]
Matériaux géologiques excavés en travaux souter- rains
Centre d’Études des Tunnels. Matériaux géologiques excavés en travaux souter- rains. spécificités, scénarios de gestion et rôle des acteurs. CETU information doc- ument (2016). URL https://www.cetu.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/ cetu_di_gestion_des_materiaux_05-2016-version_corrigee-bd .pdf
2016
-
[5]
Ordinance on the avoidance and the disposal of waste
Swiss Federal Council. Ordinance on the avoidance and the disposal of waste. ADWO 814.600 (2016). URL https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2015/891/en
2016
-
[6]
Verordnung über den verkehr mit abfällen (VeV A)
Swiss Federal Council. Verordnung über den verkehr mit abfällen (VeV A). AS 2005 4199 (2005). URL https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/oc/2005/551/de
2005
-
[7]
Basel convention on the control of transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and their disposal (2014)
UN Environment Programme. Basel convention on the control of transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and their disposal (2014). URLhttps://www.basel.int/portals/4/basel% 20convention/docs/text/baselconventiontext-e.pdf
2014
-
[8]
Directive 2008/98/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 19 novem- bre 2008 relative aux déchets et abrogeant certaines directives
European Union. Directive 2008/98/CE du Parlement européen et du Conseil du 19 novem- bre 2008 relative aux déchets et abrogeant certaines directives. JO L 312 du 22 novembre, pp 3–30 (2008). URL https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/ALL/?uri=celex% 3A32008L0098
2008
Show all 248 references
-
[9]
Guide de valorisation hors site des terres excavées non issues de sites et sols pollués dans des projets d’aménagement
Direction générale de la prévention des risques. Guide de valorisation hors site des terres excavées non issues de sites et sols pollués dans des projets d’aménagement. Ministère de la transition écologique et solidaire (2020). URL https://tex-infoterre.brgm.fr/sites/websites/...
2020
-
[10]
Déchets - guide technique des applications recom- mandées dans le cadre du projet ecomatge
Office cantonal de l’environnement (OCEV). Déchets - guide technique des applications recom- mandées dans le cadre du projet ecomatge. Réduisons nos déchets, Exportation de matéri- aux d’excavation non pollués (2018). URL https://www.ge.ch/document/dechets-guide- technique-app...
2018
-
[11]
Abada, et al., FCC-ee: The lepton collider
A. Abada, et al., FCC-ee: The lepton collider. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 228(2), 261–623 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2019-900045-4. URL https: //doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2019-900045-4
2019 doi
-
[12]
Gutleber, P
J. Gutleber, P. Laidouni, V . Mertens, A. Bibet-Chevalier, P. Boillon, S. Favre, G. Chapellier, F. Gorgerino, C. Tétrel, C. Malan, J. Joos, S. Tissandier, L. Petitpain, M. Sauvain. Synthèse des contraintes et opportunités d’implantation du futur collisionneur circulaire (fcc) ...
2025 doi
-
[13]
Guide pour la mise en oeuvre de l’évitement
Ministère de la transition écologique, Commissariat général au développement durable. Guide pour la mise en oeuvre de l’évitement. concilier environnement et aménage- ment des territoires. https://www.notre-environnement.gouv.fr/themes/evaluation/article/eviter- reduire-compen...
2021
-
[14]
Évaluation environnementale des projets d’infrastructures (2020)
Cerema. Évaluation environnementale des projets d’infrastructures (2020). URL https: //www.cerema.fr/fr/centre-ressources/boutique/evaluation-environnementale- projets-infrastructures. Accessed: 2025-03-05
2020
-
[15]
International guidelines for industrial parks (2019)
UN Industrial Development Organisation. International guidelines for industrial parks (2019). URL https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/files/2019-11/ 319 International_Guidelines_for_Industrial_Parks.pdf
2019
-
[16]
ISO 14006:2020 Environmental management sys- tems — Guidelines for incorporating ecodesign (2020)
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 14006:2020 Environmental management sys- tems — Guidelines for incorporating ecodesign (2020). Available at: https://www.iso.org/ standard/72644.html
2020
-
[17]
EUR-Lex European Union law site (2009)
Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products. EUR-Lex European Union law site (2009). URL http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2009/125/oj
2009
-
[18]
Gunningham, R.A
N. Gunningham, R.A. Kagan, D. Thornton, Social Licence and Environmental Protection: Why Businesses Go Beyond Compliance. Law & Social Inquiry 29(2), 307–341 (2004)
2004
-
[19]
Iso 14001:2015 environmental management systems (2015)
ISO. Iso 14001:2015 environmental management systems (2015). URL https://www.iso.org/ standards/popular/iso-14000-family
2015
-
[20]
ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines (2018)
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines (2018). Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html
2018
-
[21]
Pierre, G
B. Pierre, G. Johannes, L. Patrycja, V . Anne-Laure, Territorial constraint grid for France and Switzerland (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8403173. URL https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.8403173
2023 doi
-
[22]
Fargevieille, J
B. Fargevieille, J. Frossard. Bilan des garant.e.s (2025). URL https://www.debatpublic.fr/ projet-de-futur-collisionneur-circulaire-fcc-daccelerateur-de-particules-
2025
-
[23]
Guide d’évaluation environnementale stratégique (2025)
République et Canton de Genève. Guide d’évaluation environnementale stratégique (2025). URL https://www.ge.ch/document/guide-evaluation-environnementale-strategique . Ac- cessed: 2025-03-05
2025
-
[24]
Loi fédérale sur la protection de l’environnement (LPE) (1984)
Confédération suisse. Loi fédérale sur la protection de l’environnement (LPE) (1984). URL https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/1984/1122_1122_1122/fr. Accessed: 2025-03-05
1984
-
[25]
Opricovic, G.H
S. Opricovic, G.H. Tzeng, Compromise solution by mcdm methods: A comparative analysis of vikor and topsis. European Journal of Operational Research 156(2), 445–455 (2004). https: //doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
2004 doi
-
[26]
Schéma Régional des Carrières de la région Auvergne- Rhône-Alpes (2021)
DREAL Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes. Schéma Régional des Carrières de la région Auvergne- Rhône-Alpes (2021). URL https://www.auvergne-rhone-alpes .developpement- durable.gouv.fr/src-documents-approuves-a20759 .html. Accessed: 2025-03-25
2021
-
[27]
Déchets résultant des activités de construction et de démolition – années 2019 à 2021 (2022)
Canton of Geneva. Déchets résultant des activités de construction et de démolition – années 2019 à 2021 (2022). URL https://www.ge.ch/document/dechets-resultant-activites- construction-demolition-annees-2019-2021 . Accessed March 25, 2025
2022
-
[28]
Statistiques sur les déchets – matériaux d’excavation inertes (2023)
Canton of Vaud. Statistiques sur les déchets – matériaux d’excavation inertes (2023). URLhttps: //www.vd.ch/themes/environnement/dechets/statisques-sur-les-dechets/#c85800 . Accessed March 25, 2025
2023
-
[29]
Kpamegan, L
G. Kpamegan, L. Philipson, D. Stagnara, Vision stratégique Environnement, Écoconception et Développement durable (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14336970
2024 doi
-
[30]
Setec and Ecotec and Marceleon, Futur collisionneur circulaire: Analyse de l’état initial de l’environnement. Tech. rep., Setec, Ecotech and Marceleon (2025).https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.14801007
2025
-
[31]
Cartographie des projets d’envergure nationale (2024)
Ministère de la Transition Écologique. Cartographie des projets d’envergure nationale (2024). URL https://artificialisation.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/mesurer- la-consommation-despaces/cartographie-des-projets-denvergure-nationale . Ac- cessed: 2025-03-25
2024
-
[32]
de la Transition Écologique et de la Cohésion des Territoires
M. de la Transition Écologique et de la Cohésion des Territoires. Arrêté du 31 mai 2024 relatif à la mutualisation nationale de la consommation d’espaces naturels, agricoles et forestiers des 320 projets d’envergure nationale ou européenne d’intérêt général majeur (2024). URL ...
2024
-
[33]
Tudora, J
A. Tudora, J. Osborne, V . Mertens,Feasibility study of a trans-Jura FCC scenario with one trans- fer line from the LHC (2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4545604
2020 doi
-
[34]
Brüning, A
O. Brüning, A. Seryi, S. Andrés, Electron-hadron colliders: Eic, lhec and fcc-eh. Frontiers in Physics 10, 886473 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.886473
2022
-
[35]
M. Haas, D. Carraro, D. Ventra, M. Plötze, A.D. Haller, A. Moscariello, Integrated stratigraphic, sedimentological and petrographical evaluation for cern’s future circular collider subsurface in- frastructure (geneva basin, switzerland-france). Swiss Journal of Geosciences 115...
2022 doi
-
[36]
Stanyard, Y
J. Stanyard, Y . Loo, V . Mertens, J. Osborne, C. Sturzaker, M. Sykes, in8th International Particle Accelerator Conference (2017). https://doi.org/10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2017-TUPVA127
2017 doi
-
[37]
Abada, et al., FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Cirular Collider Conceptual Design Report V olume 2
A. Abada, et al., FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Cirular Collider Conceptual Design Report V olume 2. Eur. Phys. J. ST228(2), 261–623 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2019- 900045-4
2019 doi
-
[38]
Gutleber
J. Gutleber. Futur Collisionneur Circulaire: etude de traffic : etat initial (2025). https:// doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14992820
2025 doi
-
[39]
Ancelet, P
O. Ancelet, P. Boillon, J. Jobs, C. Malan, S. Tissandier. Faisabilité de connexions au réseau autoroutier (2022). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8255742
2022 doi
-
[40]
Ite - hypothèses et méthodologie de l’étude (2024)
Egis (France) and European Organization for Nuclear Research. Ite - hypothèses et méthodologie de l’étude (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10633809
2024 doi
-
[41]
Ite - classification des sites (2024)
Egis (France) and European Organization for Nuclear Research. Ite - classification des sites (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10528636
2024 doi
-
[42]
(France), E.O
E. (France), E.O. for Nuclear Research, Note Technique de faisabilité de création d’un ITE en proximité du site PJ (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10534566. URL https:// doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10534566
2024 doi
-
[43]
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10534572
Egis (France) and CERN, Note Technique de faisabilité de création d’un ITE en proximité du site PL (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10534572. URL https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.10534572
2024 doi
-
[44]
Diagnostic Environnemental - Site de Charvonnex (2024)
Egis (France) and CERN. Diagnostic Environnemental - Site de Charvonnex (2024). https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10533655
2024 doi
-
[45]
https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.10534517
Egis (France) and European Organization for Nuclear Research, Note Technique de faisabil- ité de création d’un ITE en proximité du site PG (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.10534517
2024
-
[46]
Diagnostic environnemental - site de la roche sur foron (2024)
Egis (France) and CERN. Diagnostic environnemental - site de la roche sur foron (2024). https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10533313
2024 doi
-
[47]
Diagnostic environnemental - site d’eteaux (2024)
Egis (France) and CERN. Diagnostic environnemental - site d’eteaux (2024). https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.10532758
2024 doi
-
[48]
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10534351
Egis (France) and CERN, Note Technique de faisabilité de création d’un ITE en proximité du site PF (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10534351
2024 doi
-
[49]
Bande convoyeuse pour connexion ite des sites pj & pg (2024)
Egis (France) and CERN. Bande convoyeuse pour connexion ite des sites pj & pg (2024). https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10517186
2024 doi
-
[50]
Gutleber
J. Gutleber. Renewable energy supply feasibility analysis (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.10023947
2023
-
[51]
Auchapt, J
S. Auchapt, J. Schabram. Future Circular Collider: Clean Energy Supply Study (2023). https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7781077
2023 doi
-
[52]
Meta 2024 sustainability report (2024)
Meta. Meta 2024 sustainability report (2024). URL https://sustainability.atmeta.com/ 321 wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Meta-2024-Sustainability-Report .pdf. Accessed: 2025-01-18
2024
-
[53]
Billerot, O
J.F. Billerot, O. Bonnard. Étude exploratoire pour le raccordement du FCC au Réseau Public de Transport d’électricité français (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13364463
2024 doi
-
[54]
Buri, Faisabilité du SIG d’alimentation en eau pour FCC au point LHC Pt8 (2023)
J.P. Buri, Faisabilité du SIG d’alimentation en eau pour FCC au point LHC Pt8 (2023). https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10014173
2023 doi
-
[55]
Charitos, D
P. Charitos, D. Goldsworthy. Mining the future ® innovation challenge results (2022). https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7271364
2022 doi
-
[56]
Roche, Carlo Ratti Associati uses excavated earth to form a green roof on a new company canteen for Mutti in Italy’s Food Valley
D.J. Roche, Carlo Ratti Associati uses excavated earth to form a green roof on a new company canteen for Mutti in Italy’s Food Valley. The Architect’s Newspaper (2024). URL https:// www.archpaper.com/2024/12/mutti-italys-food-valley-carlo-ratti-associati/
2024
-
[57]
Aarhus agreement ratification status online (2023)
UNECE. Aarhus agreement ratification status online (2023). URL https: //unece.org/environment-policy/public-participation/aarhus-convention/ status-ratification
2023
-
[58]
Espoo agreement ratification status online (1989)
United Nations. Espoo agreement ratification status online (1989). URL https:// treaties.un.org/pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=080000028002887c&clang=_en
1989
-
[59]
Gutleber and S
J. Gutleber and S. Valette and P. Laidouni, Futur collisionneur circulaire: Aspects environnemen- taux. Tech. rep., CERN (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14801032
2025 doi
-
[60]
D. Mauree. FCC Construction Carbon Footprint Benchmark and Optimisation Strategies (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13899160
2024 doi
-
[61]
V olume 3 CERN Environment Report (2023)
CERN. V olume 3 CERN Environment Report (2023). https://doi.org/10.25325/CERN- Environment-2023-003
2023 doi
-
[62]
High-quality environmental certification (1996)
Alliance HQE GBC, France. High-quality environmental certification (1996). URL https:// www.hqegbc.org/
1996
-
[63]
Restricted Council - Two-Hundred-and-Fourth Session (2021)
CERN’s main objectives for the period 2021-2025. Restricted Council - Two-Hundred-and-Fourth Session (2021). URL https://cds.cern.ch/record/2783560
2021
-
[64]
Accord relatif à la radioprotection en- tre le conseil fédéral suisse et l’organisation européenne pour la recherche nucléaire (2010)
European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN). Accord relatif à la radioprotection en- tre le conseil fédéral suisse et l’organisation européenne pour la recherche nucléaire (2010). URL https://legal-service.web.cern.ch/system/files/downloads/Accord%20Radio% 20protection%2...
2010
-
[65]
Gutleber
J. Gutleber. Renewable energy supply feasibility analysis (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.8074977
2023
-
[66]
Programmations pluriannuelles de l’énergie (PPE)
RTE. Programmations pluriannuelles de l’énergie (PPE). https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/ programmations-pluriannuelles-lenergie-ppe (2023). Accessed: 2023-10-13
2023
-
[67]
Rationalising the way in which the grid is operated (2020)
RTE. Rationalising the way in which the grid is operated (2020). URL https://www.rte- france.com/en/accelerate-energy-transition/rationalised-use-grid
2020
-
[68]
https://assets.rte-france.com/analyse-et- donnees/2024-03/Bilan%20Ãľlectrique%202023%20rapport%20complet_29fev24.pdf (2024)
RTE Bilan Electrique 2023, rapport complet. https://assets.rte-france.com/analyse-et- donnees/2024-03/Bilan%20Ãľlectrique%202023%20rapport%20complet_29fev24.pdf (2024)
2024
-
[69]
Réseau de Transport d’Électricité (RTE), Schéma décennal de développement du réseau à horizon
-
[70]
https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate- standard (2022)
World Resources Institute, GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance. https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate- standard (2022). URL https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/ Scope2_ExecSum_Final.pdf
2022
-
[71]
URL https://www.lazard.com/research- 322 insights/levelized-cost-of-energyplus/
Lazard’s levelized cost of energy+, version 2023. URL https://www.lazard.com/research- 322 insights/levelized-cost-of-energyplus/ . Accessed: 2023-10-13
2023
-
[72]
International Energy Agency, Managing seasonal and interannual variability of renewables. Tech. rep., IEA (2023). URL https://www.iea.org/reports/managing-seasonal-and- interannual-variability-of-renewables
2023
-
[73]
Ember Energy Website, European Wholesale Electricity Price Data (2025)
Ember Energy. Ember Energy Website, European Wholesale Electricity Price Data (2025). URL https://ember-energy.org/data/european-wholesale-electricity-price-data/
2025
-
[74]
Étude de valorisation de la chaleur du fcc
GINGER BURGEAP. Étude de valorisation de la chaleur du fcc. partie ii : Étude du process de valorisation et voies d’optimisation (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11192180
2024 doi
-
[75]
Étude de valorisation de la chaleur du fcc
GINGER BURGEAP. Étude de valorisation de la chaleur du fcc. partie iii : Analyse technico-économique et technologies complémentaires (2025). https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.14719832
2025
-
[76]
Étude de valorisation de la chaleur du fcc
GINGER BURGEAP. Étude de valorisation de la chaleur du fcc. partie i : Étude de la con- sommation du territoire et du potentiel de valorisation. (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.11192000
2024
-
[77]
Réseaux thermiques structurants - rts (2024)
République et canton de Genève. Réseaux thermiques structurants - rts (2024). URL https://www.ge.ch/installer-remplacer-chauffage/reseaux-thermiques- structurants-rts-0. Accessed: 2025-03-26
2024
-
[78]
X. Yuan, Y . Liang, X. Hu, Y . Xu, Y . Chen, R. Kosonen, Waste heat recoveries in data centers: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 188, 113777 (2023). https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113777
2023
-
[79]
CERN Environment Report 2021-2022 (2022)
CERN. CERN Environment Report 2021-2022 (2022). URL https://hse.cern/ environment-report-2021-2022
2022
-
[80]
Paris 2024 Website (2024)
Paris 2024 Press Office. Paris 2024 Website (2024). URL https://presse.paris2024.org/ actualites/brief-presse-sur-la-strategie-carbone-de-paris-2024-04f7- e0190.html
2024
-
[81]
and Geraetset, F
Dittmer, M. and Geraetset, F. and Schwipps, A. Die Klimabilanz Berliner U-Bahn und Strassenbahn planungen (2023). URL https://klimabilanz-ubahn-tram .de/download/ klimabilanz-ubahn-tram-2023-01 .pdf
2023
-
[82]
CERN Environment Report 2021–2022 (2023)
CERN. CERN Environment Report 2021–2022 (2023). URL https://hse.cern/ environment-report-2021-2022 . Online; accessed 26-March-2025
2023
-
[83]
ENGIE Elec’verte contract carbon footprint, Press release (2021)
ENGIE. ENGIE Elec’verte contract carbon footprint, Press release (2021). URL https://particuliers.engie.fr/content/dam/PDF-CP/Dossier-presse-ENGIE- reduction-impact-carbone .pdf
2021
-
[84]
France - eu climate action (2023)
European Union Climate Action. France - eu climate action (2023). URL https://climate.ec.europa.eu/document/download/9e28924b-8d69-4338-957a- 5a46d0e4e606_en?filename=fr_2023_factsheet_en.pdf. Accessed: March 26, 2025
2023
-
[85]
CERN, CERN’s strategy with respect to the environment Horizon 2030 objectives. Tech. rep., CERN (2024). URL https://edms.cern.ch/document/3161491/1
2024
-
[86]
Code de l’environnement (2020)
Gouvernement Français. Code de l’environnement (2020). URL https:// www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000041599138
2020
-
[87]
Bouget, L
C. Bouget, L. Larrieu, H. Brustel, F. Gosselin, Indice de biodiversité potentielle (ibp) : une méth- ode simple et rapide pour évaluer la biodiversité potentielle des forêts. Revue Forestière Française 66(2), 145–156 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/28373
2014 doi
-
[88]
Index of Biodiversity Potential (IBP) (2025)
Centre National de la Propriété Forestière (CNPF). Index of Biodiversity Potential (IBP) (2025). URL https://www.cnpf.fr/ibp-index-biodiversity-potential
2025
-
[89]
Grand Genève, Projet d’agglomération de 4ème génération Grand Genève - Rapport principal. Tech. rep., Grand Genève (2021) 323
2021
-
[90]
Le château voltaire (2018)
Lemanbleu TV Suisse. Le château voltaire (2018). URL https://www.lemanbleu.ch/fr/ Actualite/Archives/Le-chateau-de-Voltaire-entierement-renove .html
2018
-
[91]
Galindo, Qu’est-ce que le rayonnement ? IAEA Agence Internationale de l’énergie atomique (2024)
A. Galindo, Qu’est-ce que le rayonnement ? IAEA Agence Internationale de l’énergie atomique (2024). URL https://www.iaea.org/fr/newscenter/news/quest-ce-que-le- rayonnement
2024
-
[92]
Direction generale de la sante (DGS), Champs electromagnetiques d’extremement basse frequence. Tech. rep., Ministere des Affaires so- ciales et de la Sante (2014). URL https://sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/ Champs_electromagnetiques_extremement_basse_frequence_DGS_2014.pdf
2014
-
[93]
European Commission site on strategy for research and in- novation
European Research Infrastructures. European Commission site on strategy for research and in- novation. URL https://research-and-innovation .ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy- 2020-2024/our-digital-future/european-research-infrastructures_en
2020
-
[94]
Stuart, A
A. Stuart, A. Bond, A.M. Franco, J. Baker, C. Gerrard, V . Danino, K. Jonesf, Conceptu- alising social licence to operate. Resources Policy (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.resourpol.2023.103962
2023
-
[95]
Schwab, A
T. Schwab, A. Andreadakis, C. Bigard, N. Delille, F. Sarrazin, Approche standardisée du dimensionnement de la compensation écologique. guide de mise en œuvre. Tech. rep., Cerema (2021). URL https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/documents/ Approche_standardis%C3%A9e_...
2021
-
[96]
International Standards Organisation, ISO 1408 – monetary valuation of environmental impacts and related environmental aspects (2019)
2019
-
[97]
International Standards Organisation, ISO 14007:2019 environmental management — guidelines for determining environmental costs and benefits (2019)
2019
-
[98]
L’évaluation socio-économique des grands projets d’investissements publics
Commissariat Général à l’Investissement. L’évaluation socio-économique des grands projets d’investissements publics. French Government (2018). URL https://www.info.gouv.fr/ upload/media/organization/0001/01/sites_default_files_contenu_piece- jointe_2018_06_2015_11_27_eval_soci...
2018
-
[99]
URL https://www.parlament.ch/en/ratsbetrieb/suche-curia-vista/ geschaeft?AffairId=20240029
Encouragement of research and innovation (sectoral plan and plan approval proce- dure) (2024). URL https://www.parlament.ch/en/ratsbetrieb/suche-curia-vista/ geschaeft?AffairId=20240029
2024
-
[100]
URL https://www.parlament.ch/fr/ services/news/Pages/2024/20240927094048215194158159026_bsf042.aspx
Seventeen objects pass the parliament stage (2024). URL https://www.parlament.ch/fr/ services/news/Pages/2024/20240927094048215194158159026_bsf042.aspx
2024
-
[101]
Projet mis en consultation: Ordonnance concernant l’approbation des plans des constructions et installations du CERN (OCIC)
Conseil fédéral. Projet mis en consultation: Ordonnance concernant l’approbation des plans des constructions et installations du CERN (OCIC). Confédération Suisse. Fedlex. La plateforme de publication du droit fédéral. (2025). URL https://fedlex.data.admin.ch/eli/dl/proj/ 2025...
2025
-
[102]
Note de l’autorité environnementale sur les évaluations socio-économiques des projets d’infrastructures linéaires de transport
Autorité environnementale (CGEDD). Note de l’autorité environnementale sur les évaluations socio-économiques des projets d’infrastructures linéaires de transport. In- spection générale de l’Environnement et du Développement durable (IGEDD) (2017). URL https://www.igedd.develop...
2017
-
[103]
www.wissenschaftsrat.de (2024)
BMBF, Guidelines for preparing the draft proposal for a large research infrastructure for the national prioritisation process of the federal ministry of education and research. www.wissenschaftsrat.de (2024). URL https://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/ 2024/FIS_Guidelines_Pr...
2024
-
[104]
Ferretti, K
J. Ferretti, K. Daedlow, J. Kopfmüller, M. Winkelmann, A. Podhora, et al., Framework for reflection on research with societal responsibility. www.nachhaltig-forschen.de (2023). 324 URL https://www.nachhaltig-forschen.de/assets/lena_nachhaltig-forschen/ user_upload/20240216_LeN...
2023
-
[105]
CINEA guide on economic appraisal for CEF-T transport projects
Connecting Europe Facility. CINEA guide on economic appraisal for CEF-T transport projects. European Commission (2022). URL https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/ opportunities/docs/2021-2027/cef/guidance/cinea-guidance-on-economic- appraisal_cef-t_en.pdf
2022
-
[106]
Cost benefit analysis for transport infrastructure projects
Economic Commission for Europe. Cost benefit analysis for transport infrastructure projects. UNECE website (2003). URL https://unece.org/DAM/trans/doc/2008/wp5/CBAe.pdf
2003
-
[107]
ENTSO-E guideline for cost benefit analysis of grid development projects
European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity. ENTSO-E guideline for cost benefit analysis of grid development projects. ENTSOE Website (2024). URL https://eepublicdownloads.blob.core.windows.net/public-cdn-container/clean- documents/news/2024/entso-e_4th_C...
2024
-
[108]
https:// doi.org/doi:10.2776/97516
European Commission, Guide to Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects(Publications Office of the European Union, European Commission, B-1160 Brussels, Belgium, 2015). https:// doi.org/doi:10.2776/97516
2015 doi
-
[109]
https://doi.org/ 10.2779/41957
European Commission and Directorate-General for Environment, The economic benefits of the Natura 2000 network – Synthesis report (Publications Office, 2013). https://doi.org/ 10.2779/41957
2000 doi
-
[110]
Articolo, M
R. Articolo, M. Florio. CBA in decision-making processes of EU-27). CISL Working Paper N. 01/2023 (2023). URL https://www.csilmilano.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/ WP2023_01.pdf
2023
-
[111]
Giffoni, S
F. Giffoni, S. Vignetti, Assessing the socioeconomic impact of research infrastructures: A sys- tematic review of existing approaches and the role of cost-benefit analysis. L’industria, Rivista di economia e politica industriale 1, 75–102 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1430/94060
2019 doi
-
[112]
OECD, Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment (OECD, 2018), p. 456. https://doi.org/ 10.1787/9789264085169-en
2018 doi
-
[113]
Montalvo, J
J. Montalvo, J. Raya. Economic and Social Impact of ALBA II (2023). URL https:// www.cells.es/en/science-at-alba/alba-ii-upgrade/socioeconomicimpact_albaii- eng.pdf
2023
-
[114]
Etude d’impact socio-économique de SOLEIL
VertigoLab. Etude d’impact socio-économique de SOLEIL. Site web VertigoLab (2020). URL https://vertigolab.eu/portfolio/etude-dimpact-socio-economique- de-soleil-methode-multiplicateur/
2020
-
[115]
Kroll, T
H. Kroll, T. Stahlecker, A. Zenker, Impact-Studie für die Synchrotronstrahlungsquelle PETRA III im Kontext des Forschungs- und Innovationsökosystems DESY. Tech. rep., DESY (Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron) (2023). https://doi.org/10.24406/publica-19299. Accessed: 2025-03-10
2023 doi
-
[116]
Battistoni, M
G. Battistoni, M. Genco, M. Marsilio, C. Pancotti, S. Rossi, S. Vignetti, Cost–benefit analysis of applied research infrastructure. Evidence from health care. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 112, 79–91 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.001
2016 doi
-
[117]
Florio, S
M. Florio, S. Forte, E. Sirtori, Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Large Hadron Collider to 2025 and beyond. Tech. rep., CERN (2015). URL https://cds.cern.ch/record/2036479
2015
-
[118]
Bastianin, Findings from the LHC/HL-LHC Programme (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021), pp
A. Bastianin, Findings from the LHC/HL-LHC Programme (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021), pp. 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52391-6_10
2021 doi
-
[119]
Bastianin, M
A. Bastianin, M. Florio, Social Cost Benefit Analysis of HL-LHC. Tech. rep., CERN, Geneva (2018). URL https://cds.cern.ch/record/2319300
2018
-
[120]
Bastianin, C
A. Bastianin, C. F. Del Bo, M. Florio, F. Giffoni, Projecting the socio-economic impact of a big science center: the world’s largest particle accelerator at CERN. Applied Economics 55(49), 5768–5789 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2140763 325
2023
-
[121]
Magazinik, Investigating the Societal Impact of Large Research Infrastructure : A Study on the Compact Linear Collider at CERN
A. Magazinik, Investigating the Societal Impact of Large Research Infrastructure : A Study on the Compact Linear Collider at CERN. Ph.D. thesis, Tampere U. (2022). URL https: //cds.cern.ch/record/2836841. Presented on 2022-11-11
2022
-
[122]
Socio-economic impacts of the lepton collider-based research infrastructure (2024)
CSIL and CERN. Socio-economic impacts of the lepton collider-based research infrastructure (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10653396
2024 doi
-
[123]
Cuccuru, L
S. Cuccuru, L. Vargiu, L. Deidda, B. Biagi, G. Atzeni, Einstein Telescope: An Assessment of Its Economic, Social and Environmental Impact in Sardinia (Smashwords, 2021)
2021
-
[124]
Boisdet, J
A. Boisdet, J. Maurice. Contre-expertise de l’évaluation socio-économique du projet de réseau de chaleur et de froid sur l’aquifère de l’Albien de l’etablissement public Paris- Saclay (2015). URL https://www.info.gouv.fr/upload/media/organization/0001/01/ sites_default_files_c...
2015
-
[125]
Bouabdallah, S
K. Bouabdallah, S. Larger, P.Y . Steunou. Contre-expertise de l’évaluation socio-économique du projet de construction d’un campus santé à Nantes (2020). URL https://www.info.gouv.fr/ upload/media/organization/0001/01/sites_default_files_contenu_piece- jointe_2021_04_rapport_ce...
2020
-
[126]
Walsh, J
A. Walsh, J. Merker, A. de Hernandez, A. O’Connor. The Value of CSIRO: The Broader Impact of CSIRO’s Portfolio of Activities. CSIRO Website (2022). URL https://www.csiro.au/en/about/Corporate-governance/Ensuring-our-impact/ Auditing-our-impact/2022-impact-assessment
2022
-
[127]
Adamst, A
D. Adamst, A. Tiplady, F. Sgard. Integration of socio-economic impact into the development of the square kilometre array (ska) in south africa. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, OECD Publishing, Paris (2023). https://doi.org/10.1787/04438223-en
2023 doi
-
[128]
Dervaux, L
B. Dervaux, L. Rochaix, et al. L’évaluation socioéconomique des effets de santé des projets d’investissement public (2022). URL https://www.strategie.gouv.fr/sites/ strategie.gouv.fr/files/atoms/files/fs-2022-rapport-sante-mars_0 .pdf
2022
-
[129]
Palmisano, Realizzazione di un parco agrivoltaico avanzato di potenza nominale pari a 24 MWp denominato "MACOMER" sito nei comuni di Macomer e Borore (NU)
A. Palmisano, Realizzazione di un parco agrivoltaico avanzato di potenza nominale pari a 24 MWp denominato "MACOMER" sito nei comuni di Macomer e Borore (NU). Tech. rep., Enerland Italia s.r.l. (2023). URL https://va.mite.gov.it/it-IT/Oggetti/Documentazione/9533/14003
2023
-
[130]
Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti (2022)
Linee guida operative per la valutazione degli investimenti in opere pubbliche. Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti (2022). URLhttps://www.mit.gov.it/nfsmitgov/files/media/ documentazione/2022-09/LINEE%20GUIDA%20SETTORE%20IDRICO_14.09.2022.pdf
2022
-
[131]
ESFRI roadmap entry submission form on- line (2023)
European Commission. ESFRI roadmap entry submission form on- line (2023). URL https://www.esfri.eu/sites/default/files/ ESFRI_Roadmap2026_Proposal_Submission_Questionnaire_FINALv2.pdf
2023
-
[132]
Esfri roadmap 2026 – public guide (2024)
European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI). Esfri roadmap 2026 – public guide (2024). URL https://www.esfri.eu/sites/default/files/ ESFRI_Roadmap2026_Public%20Guide_approved_FINAL.pdf. Accessed: 2025-03-16
2024
-
[133]
European Research Area (ERA) website (2023)
European Commission. European Research Area (ERA) website (2023). URL https://research-and-innovation .ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy-2020-2024/ our-digital-future/european-research-area_en
2023
-
[134]
European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (2025)
European Commission. European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (2025). URL https://www.esfri.eu
2025
-
[135]
European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) (2023)
European Commission. European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) (2023). URL https://research-and-innovation .ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy-2020-2024/ our-digital-future/european-research-infrastructures/eric_en
2023
-
[136]
EUR-Lex European Union law site (2021)
Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. EUR-Lex European Union law site (2021). URL http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/695/oj 326
2021
-
[137]
2 (ESFRI Scripta, published by Dipartimento di Fisica - Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy, 2017)
ESFRI Long Term Sustainability Working Group, Long-Term Sustainability of Research In- frastructures, vol. 2 (ESFRI Scripta, published by Dipartimento di Fisica - Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy, 2017). URL https://www.esfri.eu/sites/default/files/u4/ esfri_scripta_vol...
2017
-
[138]
ESFRI - European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures, Guidelines in cost estimation of research infrastructures. Tech. rep., ESFRI (2020). URL https://www.esfri.eu/sites/ default/files/StR-ESFRI2_STUDY_RIs_COST_ESTIMATION_0.pdf
2020
-
[139]
Kolar, G
J. Kolar, G. Lutz, K. Angelieva, J. Angelis, B. Brecko, M. Chamberlain, E. Guittet, F. Karayan- nis, J. Plaskan, M. Ryan, D. Sobczak, P. Wenzel-Constabel, ESFRI policy brief on assessment of impact of research infrastructures. Tech. rep., ESFRI (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/...
2023
-
[140]
Better Criteria for Better Evaluation (2025)
OECD. Better Criteria for Better Evaluation (2025). URL https://www.oecd.org/dac/ evaluation/revised-evaluation-criteria-dec-2019 .pdf
2025
-
[141]
European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) (2025)
European Commission. European Research Infrastructure Consortium (ERIC) (2025). URL https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/better-regulation-guidelines- impact-assessment.pdf
2025
-
[142]
URL https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri= CELEX%3A32013R1303
Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 Decem- ber 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Develop- ment and the...
2013
-
[143]
https://doi.org/ 10.2776/182302
European Commission, Economic Appraisal Vademecum 2021-2027 (Publications Office of the European Union, European Commission, B-1049 Brussels, Belgium, 2021). https://doi.org/ 10.2776/182302
2021 doi
-
[144]
EUR-Lex European Union law site (2015)
Regulation (EU) no 2015/207 of the European Parliament and of the Council for carrying out the cost-benefit analysis. EUR-Lex European Union law site (2015)
2015
-
[145]
URL https://downloads.unido.org/ot/48/06/4806860/Practical%20Appraisal%20of% 20Industrial%20Projects,%20application%20of%20so.pdf
United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Guide to practical project appraisals: Social benefit-cost analysis in developing countries (UNIDO Publication, 1980). URL https://downloads.unido.org/ot/48/06/4806860/Practical%20Appraisal%20of% 20Industrial%20Projects,%20ap...
1980
-
[147]
Légifrance (2024)
Code de l’environnement. Légifrance (2024). URL https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/ texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006074220/
2024
-
[148]
Code de l’environnement: Sous-section 5: Information et partic- ipation du public (2019)
European Commission. Code de l’environnement: Sous-section 5: Information et partic- ipation du public (2019). URL https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/ LEGIARTI000038247366
2019
-
[149]
annexe au projet de loi de finances pour 2024 (jaunes budgétaires)
Évaluaiton des grands projets d’investissement publics. annexe au projet de loi de finances pour 2024 (jaunes budgétaires). La plateforme des finances publiques, du budget de l’État et de la per- formance publique (2023). URL https://www.budget.gouv.fr/documentation/documents-...
2023
-
[150]
Guesnerie
R. Guesnerie. Guide de l’évaluation socioéconomique des investissements publics. https://www.strategie.gouv.fr/publications/guide-de-levaluation-socioeconomique- investissements-publics-edition-2023 (2023). URL https://www.strategie.gouv.fr/ 327 sites/strategie.gouv.fr/files/a...
2023
-
[151]
France Stratégie, Guide d’évaluation des investissements publics. Tech. rep., France Stratégie (2023). URL https://www.strategie.gouv.fr/files/2025-01/fs-2023-guide- evaluation-investissements-publics-septembre .pdf. Version: septembre 2023
2023
-
[152]
Federal act on the promotion of research and innovation (2023)
Schweizerische Eidgenopssenschaft. Federal act on the promotion of research and innovation (2023). URL https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2013/786/en
2023
-
[153]
Erstes Ja zu Planungsgrundlagen für Kernforschungszentrum CERN (2024)
Keystone-SDA. Erstes Ja zu Planungsgrundlagen für Kernforschungszentrum CERN (2024). URL https://www.parlament.ch/de/services/news/Seiten/2024/ 20240529172502542194158159026_bsd172.aspx
2024
-
[154]
Secrétariat d’État à la formation, à la recherche et à l’innovation (SEFRI), Plan secto- riel cern. Tech. rep., Secrétariat d’État à la formation, à la recherche et à l’innovation (SEFRI) (2025). URL https://www.sbfi.admin.ch/dam/sbfi/de/dokumente/2024/10/ plan_sectoriel_cern....
2025
-
[155]
Florio, S
M. Florio, S. Forte, C. Pancotti, E. Sirtori, S. Vignetti, Exploring cost-benefit analysis of research, development and innovation infrastructures: An evaluation framework. Tech. rep., Università di Milano (2016). URL https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1603/1603.03654.pdf
2016 arXiv
-
[156]
International Standards Organisation, ISO 14040:2006 environmental management — life cycle assessment — principles and framework (2006)
2006
-
[157]
URL https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ ILCD-Handbook-General-guide-for-LCA-DETAILED-GUIDANCE-12March2010-ISBN- fin-v1.0-EN.pdf
European Commission – Joint Research Centre – Institute for Environment and Sustainability, International reference life cycle data system (ILCD) handbook - general guide for life cycle assessment - detailed guidance (2010). URL https://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ ILCD-Han...
2010
-
[158]
V ogel,Review of the Use of ‘Theory of Change’ in International Development(UK Department for International Development (DFID), 2012)
I. V ogel,Review of the Use of ‘Theory of Change’ in International Development(UK Department for International Development (DFID), 2012). URL https://www.theoryofchange.org/pdf/ DFID_ToC_Review_VogelV7.pdf
2012
-
[159]
URL https://ri- paths-tool.eu
Research infrastructures’ impact assessment toolkit - RI-PATHS (2024). URL https://ri- paths-tool.eu
2024
-
[160]
G. Boulton. Science as a Global Public Good. International Science Council Position Paper. International Science Council (2021). https://doi.org/10.24948/2021.09
2021 doi
-
[161]
Mazzucato, The entrepreneurial state : debunking public vs
M. Mazzucato, The entrepreneurial state : debunking public vs. private sector myths . An- them frontiers of global political economy (Anthem Press, London, 2013). URL https: //www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/2e9d0215a37508b77b5f48afda5a55c7c/meneteqel
2013
-
[162]
Scudellari, The sprint to solve coronavirus protein structures — and disarm them with drugs
M. Scudellari, The sprint to solve coronavirus protein structures — and disarm them with drugs. Nature 581, 252–255 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01444-z
2020 doi
-
[163]
Buchanan, G
J. Buchanan, G. Tullock, The calculus of consent, logical foundations of constitutional democracy (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1962), p. 361
1962
-
[164]
Solow, A guide to modern economics (Routledge, 1996), p
R. Solow, A guide to modern economics (Routledge, 1996), p. 19. Growth theory
1996
-
[165]
Akerlof, J
A. Akerlof, J. Spence, J. Stiglitz. Information for the Public, Markets with Asymmetric Informa- tion (2001). URL https://sustainability.atmeta.com/2024-sustainability-report/. Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2001-1
2001
-
[166]
E. Ostrom. The economics of common-pool resources (2000)
2000
-
[167]
J. Tirole. Market power and regulation (2001). Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences 2014
2001
-
[168]
Milgrom, R
P. Milgrom, R. Wilson. Improvements to auction theory and inventions of new auction formats (2020). Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences 2020 328
2020
-
[169]
Davis, The Value of Outdoor Recreation: An Economic Study of the Maine Woods (Harvard University., 1963)
R. Davis, The Value of Outdoor Recreation: An Economic Study of the Maine Woods (Harvard University., 1963). URL https://books.google.ch/books?id=jeRxbwAACAAJ
1963
-
[170]
Arrow, Report of noaa panel on contingent valuation
K. Arrow, Report of noaa panel on contingent valuation. 58 Federal Register 4601 (1993). URL https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/60900
1993
-
[171]
Carson, R
R. Carson, R. Mitchell, M. Hanemann, R. Kopp, S. Presser, P. Ruud, Contingent valuation and lost passive use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environmental and Resource Economics 25(3), 257–286 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024486702104
2003 doi
-
[172]
Catalano, M
G. Catalano, M. Florio, F. Giffoni, Willingness to pay for basic research: A contingent valuation experiment on the Large Hadron Collider. Departmental working papers, Department of Eco- nomics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano (2016). UR...
2016
-
[173]
Bastianin, M
A. Bastianin, M. Florio, LHC upgrade brings benefits beyond physics. CERN Courier (2018). URL https://cerncourier.com/a/lhc-upgrade-brings-benefits-beyond-physics
2018
-
[174]
Giffoni, M
F. Giffoni, M. Florio, Public support of science: A contingent valuation study of citizens’ attitudes about CERN with and without information about implicit taxes. Research Policy 52(1), 104627 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104627
2023
-
[175]
The impact of ac- tris on society: outcome of a contingent valuation study
K.Petrinoli, S.Mirasgedis, N.Mihalopoulos, T.Petäjä, E.Juurola. The impact of ac- tris on society: outcome of a contingent valuation study. ACTRIS Website (2023). URL https://www.actris.eu/sites/default/files/Documents/ACTRIS%20IMP/ Deliverables/ACTRIS%20IMP_WP3_D3.3_The%20imp...
2023
-
[176]
URL https:// commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing- law/better-regulation/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox/better- regulation-toolbox_en
European Commission, Better Regulation Toolbox (2023). URL https:// commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing- law/better-regulation/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox/better- regulation-toolbox_en. Accessed: 2025-02-07
2023
-
[177]
L. Secci. The value of particle physics research at CERN as public good (2023). https:// doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7766949
2023 doi
-
[178]
Johnston, J
R.J. Johnston, J. Rolfe, R.S. Rosenberger, R. Brouwer, Introduction to Benefit Transfer Methods (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2015), pp. 19–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017- 9930-0_2
2015 doi
-
[179]
Camporesi, G
T. Camporesi, G. Catalano, M. Florio, F. Giffoni, Experiential learning in high energy physics: a survey of students at the LHC. European Journal of Physics 38(2), 025703 (2017). https: //doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aa5121
2017 doi
-
[180]
Crescenzi, G
R. Crescenzi, G. Piazza. Recommendations to increase the socio-economic impact of the Future Circular Collider for member states (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13166167
2024 doi
-
[181]
Assessing scientific knowledge creation and dissemination in an open science world: evi- dence from the CERN experiments (2024)
CSIL. Assessing scientific knowledge creation and dissemination in an open science world: evi- dence from the CERN experiments (2024). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13920183
2024 doi
-
[182]
Morretta, D
V . Morretta, D. Vurchio, S. Carrazza, The socio-economic value of scientific publications: The case of earth observation satellites. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 180, 121730 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121730
2022
-
[183]
Gutleber, P
J. Gutleber, P. Charitos (eds.), From Science to Society: The Open Science and Innovation and Network Approach (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2025), pp. 1–34. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-031-60931-2_1
2025 doi
-
[184]
Griniece, J
E. Griniece, J. Angelis, A. Reid, S. Vignetti, J. Catalano, A. Helman, M. Rami, H. Kroll. Guidebook for Socio-Economic Impact Assessment of Research Infrastructures (2020). https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3950043
2020 doi
-
[185]
Castelnovo, M
P. Castelnovo, M. Florio, S. Forte, L. Rossi, E. Sirtori, The economic impact of technological pro- curement for large-scale research infrastructures: Evidence from the large hadron collider at cern. 329 Research Policy 47(9), 1853–1867 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol...
2018 doi
-
[186]
Florio, E
M. Florio, E. Sirtori, Social benefits and costs of large scale research infrastructures. Tech- nological Forecasting and Social Change 112, 65–78 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.techfore.2015.11.024
2016
-
[187]
Florio, F
M. Florio, F. Giffoni, A. Giunta, E. Sirtori, Big science, learning, and innovation: evidence from CERN procurement. Industrial and Corporate Change 27(5), 915–936 (2018). https: //doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty029
2018 doi
-
[188]
Autio, A.P
E. Autio, A.P. Hameri, O. Vuola, A framework of industrial knowledge spillovers in big- science centers. Research Policy 33(1), 107–126 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048- 7333(03)00105-7
2004 doi
-
[189]
Nordberg, A
M. Nordberg, A. Campbell, A. Verbeke, Using customer relationships to acquire technolog- ical innovation: A value-chain analysis of supplier contracts with scientific research institu- tions. Journal of Business Research56(9), 711–719 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148- 296...
2003 doi
-
[191]
Crescenzi, G
R. Crescenzi, G. Piazza, How to Measure the Local Economic Impact of Large Research In- frastructure Procurement (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2025), pp. 137–148. https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60931-2_11
2025 doi
-
[192]
Moretti, Local multipliers
E. Moretti, Local multipliers. American Economic Review 100(2), 373–77 (2010). https:// doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.373
2010 doi
-
[193]
Florio, S
M. Florio, S. Forte, E. Sirtori, Forecasting the socio-economic impact of the Large Hadron Col- lider: A cost–benefit analysis to 2025 and beyond. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 112, 38–53 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.007
2016 doi
-
[194]
Crespo Garrido, M
I.d.R. Crespo Garrido, M. Loureiro García, J. Gutleber, The Value of a Collaborative Platform in a Global Project. The Indico Case Study (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2025), pp. 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60931-2_13
2025 doi
-
[195]
Crespo Garrido, M
I.d.R. Crespo Garrido, M. Loureiro García, J. Gutleber, The Value of an Open Scientific Data and Documentation Platform in a Global Project: The Case of Zenodo (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2025), pp. 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60931-2_14
2025 doi
-
[196]
Garrido, I
C. Garrido, I. del Rosario, M. Loureiro García, J. Gutleber, The Value of Open Science at CERN: An Analysis Based on a Travel Cost Model(Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2025), pp. 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60931-2_5
2025 doi
-
[197]
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Nasa texas economic snapshot. https://comptroller.texas.gov/economy/economic-data/nasa/snapshot.php (2024). URL https: //comptroller.texas.gov/economy/economic-data/nasa/docs/snapshot.pdf
2024
-
[198]
Weaver, Celestial ecotourism: new horizons in nature-based tourism
D. Weaver, Celestial ecotourism: new horizons in nature-based tourism. Journal of Ecotourism 10(1), 38–45 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/14724040903576116
2011 doi
-
[199]
van Wyk-Jacobs, Astro-tourism as a catalyst for rural route development
L. van Wyk-Jacobs, Astro-tourism as a catalyst for rural route development. Ph.D. thesis, Univer- sity of Pretoria, South Africa (2018). URL http://hdl.handle.net/2263/70036. PhD Thesis
2018
-
[200]
Blekman, A
F. Blekman, A. Cardini, L.X.C. Saravia, Crowd-sourced particle physics stories from desy-cms (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04967. arXiv:2410.04967 [physics.soc-ph]
2024 arXiv
-
[201]
Botschaft zur Änderung des bundesgesetzes über die förderung der forschung und der innovation (sachplan und plangenehmigungsverfahren)
Swiss Confederation. Botschaft zur Änderung des bundesgesetzes über die förderung der forschung und der innovation (sachplan und plangenehmigungsverfahren). Fedlex. Die Pub- likationsplattform des Bundesrechtes (2024). URL https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/fga/ 2024/532 330
2024
-
[202]
Loi n° 2021-1104 du 22 août 2021 portant lutte contre le dérèglement climatique et renforcement de la résilience face à ses effets
République française. Loi n° 2021-1104 du 22 août 2021 portant lutte contre le dérèglement climatique et renforcement de la résilience face à ses effets. Légifrance (2024). URL https: //www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000043956924
2024
-
[203]
Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Coun- cil of 11 december 2018 on the governance of the energy union and climate action
European Commission. Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Coun- cil of 11 december 2018 on the governance of the energy union and climate action. EUR-Lex European Union law site (2018). URL http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1999/oj
2018
-
[204]
Alligand, S
G. Alligand, S. Hubert, T. Legendre, F. Millar, A. Müller. Évaluation environnementale. guide d’aide à la définition des mesures erc. Ministère de la transition écologique et solidaire (2018). URL https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/publications/Th% C3%A9ma%20-%20...
2018
-
[205]
Plan sectoriel des surfaces d’assolement (sda) (2020)
Office fédéral du développement territorial (ARE). Plan sectoriel des surfaces d’assolement (sda) (2020). URL https://www.are.admin.ch/dam/are/fr/dokumente/raumplanung/ dokumente/bericht/b1-sachplan-fruchtfolgeflachen-08052020 .pdf.download.pdf/ b1-plan-sectoriel-des-surfaces-...
2020
-
[206]
Compensation écologique
Office fédéral de l’environnement OFEV. Compensation écologique. BAFU/OFEV web- site. (2022). URL https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/fr/home/themes/biodiversite/ info-specialistes/utilisation-durable-de-la-biodiversite/compensation- ecologique.html
2022
-
[207]
Federal Act on the Protection of Nature and Cultural Heritage
Swiss Confederation. Federal Act on the Protection of Nature and Cultural Heritage. Fedlex. The publication platform for federal law. (1966). URL https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/ cc/1966/1637_1694_1679/en
1966
-
[208]
Bastianin, P
A. Bastianin, P. Castelnovo, M. Florio, A. Giunta. Technological learning and innovation ges- tation lags at the frontier of science: from cern procurement to patent (2019). URL https: //arxiv.org/abs/1905.09552
2019 arXiv
-
[209]
Sirtori, G
E. Sirtori, G. Catalano, F. Giffoni, C. Pancotti, A. Caputo, M. Florio, Impact of CERN pro- curement actions on industry: 28 illustrative success stories (CERN, Geneva, 2019). URL https://cds.cern.ch/record/2670056
2019
-
[210]
Knowledge transfer centre at CERN (2000)
CERN. Knowledge transfer centre at CERN (2000). URL https://https://kt.cern/
2000
-
[211]
Knowledge transfer centre at DESY (2000)
DESY. Knowledge transfer centre at DESY (2000). URL https://innovation.desy.de
2000
-
[212]
Knowledge transfer centre at INFN (2000)
INFN. Knowledge transfer centre at INFN (2000). URL https://web.infn.it/TechTransfer/
2000
-
[213]
Knowledge transfer centre at FNAL (2000)
FNAL. Knowledge transfer centre at FNAL (2000). URL https://partnerships.fnal.gov/
2000
-
[214]
SESAME, Synchrotron light for experimental science in the Middle East (2003)
SESAME. SESAME, Synchrotron light for experimental science in the Middle East (2003). URL https://www.sesame.org.jo
2003
-
[215]
URL https://www.esfri.eu/latest-esfri-news/new-study-guidelines-cost- estimation-research-infrastructures-str-esfri
ESFRI, Guidelines on Cost Estimation of Research Infrastructures (ESFRI, 2019). URL https://www.esfri.eu/latest-esfri-news/new-study-guidelines-cost- estimation-research-infrastructures-str-esfri
2019
-
[216]
European Commission, Commission notice — technical guidance on the climate proofing of infrastructure in the period 2021-2027. Tech. Rep. 373 (2021). URL https://eur- lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021XC0916(03)
2021
-
[217]
Paris Agreement
United Nations. Paris Agreement. United Nations Treaty Collection (2015). URL https:// unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
2015
-
[218]
ten Raa, Input-Output Economics: Theory and Applications (World Scientific, 2009)
T. ten Raa, Input-Output Economics: Theory and Applications (World Scientific, 2009). URL https://doi.org/10.1142/6968
2009 doi
-
[219]
Johnston, K
R. Johnston, K. Boyle, W. Adamowicz, J. Bennett, R. Brouwer, T. Cameron, M. Hanemann, N. Hanley, M. Ryan, R. Scarpa, R. Tourangeau, C. V ossler, Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4(2), 331 3...
2017
-
[220]
Pearce, G
D. Pearce, G. Atkinson, S. Mourato, Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: recent develop- ments (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and development, 2006)
2006
-
[221]
OECD Publishing, Paris, (2018)
OECD, Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: further developments and policy use. OECD Publishing, Paris, (2018). URL https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/cost-benefit- analysis-and-the-environment_9789264085169-en .html
2018
-
[222]
Quinet, L’évaluation socioéconomique des investissements publics
E. Quinet, L’évaluation socioéconomique des investissements publics. Tech. rep., HAL (2014)
2014
-
[223]
HM Treasury guidance on how to appraise and evaluate policies, projects and programmes
HM Treasury and Government Finance Function. HM Treasury guidance on how to appraise and evaluate policies, projects and programmes. the ‘green book’. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation-in- central-government (2024). URL https://...
2024
-
[224]
Sartori, G
D. Sartori, G. Catalano, M. Genco, C. Pancotti, E. Sirtori, S. Vignetti, C. Bo, et al., Guide to cost- benefit analysis of investment projects. Economic appraisal tool for cohesion policy 2014-2020 (Regional and Urban Policy, 2014)
2014
-
[225]
Krogerus, R
M. Krogerus, R. Tschäppeler, J. Piening, The Decision Book: Fifty Models for Strategic Thinking, 1st American ed. (W.W. Norton & Co., 2012), p. 173
2012
-
[226]
O’Mahony, Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: The time horizon is of the essence
T. O’Mahony, Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: The time horizon is of the essence. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 89, 106587 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.eiar.2021.106587
2021
-
[227]
UN web site (2024)
United Nations SDG communication materials. UN web site (2024). URL https://www.un.org/ sustainabledevelopment/news/communications-material
2024
-
[228]
URL https://sdgtransformationcenter.org
The SDG transformation center (2024). URL https://sdgtransformationcenter.org
2024
-
[229]
Leadership Council of the Sustainable Development Solutions Network, Indicators and a monitoring framework for the Sustainable Development Goals. Tech. rep., SDSN (2015). URL https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/2013150612- FINAL-SDSN-Indicator-Report1 .pdf
2015
-
[230]
URL https://hse.cern/ environment-report-2021-2022/gri-content-index
CERN environment report 2021-2022 - GRI content index (2023). URL https://hse.cern/ environment-report-2021-2022/gri-content-index
2023
-
[231]
Our World in Data (2023)
Our World in Data team, SDG tracker: Measuring progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Our World in Data (2023). URL https://ourworldindata.org/sdgs
2023
-
[232]
KnowSDGs (2024)
Find out more about the SDGs. KnowSDGs (2024). URL https:// knowsdgs.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sdg/\{1-17\}
2024
-
[233]
Meta sustainability report (2024)
Meta. Meta sustainability report (2024). URL https://sustainability.atmeta.com/2024- sustainability-report/
2024
-
[234]
https://doi.org/ 10.2867/076767
European Investment Bank, The economic appraisal of investment projects at the EIB – 2nd edition March 2023 (Publications Office of the European Union, 2022). https://doi.org/ 10.2867/076767
2023 doi
-
[235]
Web site of UBA (2024)
Gesellschaftliche Kosten von Umweltbelsatungen. Web site of UBA (2024). URL https: //www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/umwelt-wirtschaft/gesellschaftliche-kosten- von-umweltbelastungen#gesamtwirtschaftliche-bedeutung-der-umweltkosten
2024
-
[236]
Valuation of greenhouse gas emissions: for policy appraisal and evaluation
Department for Energy Security & Net Zero. Valuation of greenhouse gas emissions: for policy appraisal and evaluation. https://www.gov.uk (2021). URL https://www.gov.uk/government/ publications/valuing-greenhouse-gas-emissions-in-policy-appraisal/ valuation-of-greenhouse-gas-e...
2021
-
[237]
National Center for Environmental Economics, Climate Change Division, Report on the so- 332 cial cost of greenhouse gases: Estimates incorporating recent scientific advances. Tech. rep., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2023). URL https://www.epa.gov/environmental- econom...
2023
-
[238]
URL https:// commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/ better-regulation/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox_en
European Commission, Better Regulation Guidelines (2021). URL https:// commission.europa.eu/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/ better-regulation/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolbox_en . SWD(2021) 305 final
2021
-
[239]
Catalano, M
J. Catalano, M. Da Col, M. Genco, C. Pancotti, A. Tracogna, S. Vignetti. Complementary socio- economic impact analysis of the lepton collider-based research infrastructure. updated assump- tions, input data, results and calculations (2025).https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14905017
2025 doi
-
[240]
F. Bent, B. Nils, R. Werner, Megaprojects and risk: An anatomy of ambition. International Journal of Public Sector Management 17 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550410530199
2003 doi
-
[241]
Flyvbjerg, in The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research , ed
B. Flyvbjerg, in The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research , ed. by N.K. Denzin, Y .S. Lincoln (Sage Publications, 2011), chap. 17, pp. 301–316
2011
-
[242]
Flyvbjerg, What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview
B. Flyvbjerg, What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Man- agement Journal 45 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21409
2014 doi
-
[243]
Streicher
G. Streicher. Building CERN’s Future Circular Collider. An Estimation of its Impact on Value Added and Employment (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7986138
2023 doi
-
[244]
Policy recommendations to optimise the na- tional returns relating to fcc contributions
Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO). Policy recommendations to optimise the na- tional returns relating to fcc contributions. https://www.wifo.ac.at/en/project/268677/ (2024). Accessed: 2025-03-10
2024
-
[245]
Ferreira, et al., in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2009) (CERN, 2009)
P. Ferreira, et al., in Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computing in High Energy and Nuclear Physics (CHEP 2009) (CERN, 2009). URL https://indico.cern.ch/ event/61310/contributions/1228382/
2009
-
[246]
Gentil-Beccot, S
A. Gentil-Beccot, S. Mele, T.C. Brooks, Scoap 3: The open access initiative for high-energy physics. Insights 27(3), 264–268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.171
2014 doi
-
[247]
Nielsen, T
L.H. Nielsen, T. Smith, P. Manghi, N. Manola, Zenodo: An open-access repository for every- one. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Digital Libraries (2014). URL https: //zenodo.org/record/13006
2014
-
[248]
Ginsparg, arXiv at 20
P. Ginsparg, arXiv at 20. Nature 476(7359), 145–147 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ 476145a 333
2011
-
[2040]
rep., RTE (2025)
Tech. rep., RTE (2025). URL https://www.rte-france.com/analyses-tendances- et-prospectives/le-schema-decennal-de-developpement-du-reseau . Accessed: 2025-03-08
2025
-
[5952]
Accessed: 2025-03-25
2025
Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.