Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 1 cited by

GuideSR: Rethinking Guidance for One-Step High-Fidelity Diffusion-Based Super-Resolution

T0 review · 3 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read GuideSR claims that one-step diffusion super-resolution beats multi-step baselines by conditioning on full-resolution features instead of VAE latents.

desk verdict A promising one-step diffusion SR architecture with a plausible full-resolution guidance mechanism, but the ablation that would prove the mechanism distinct from long-skips is missing. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.00687 v1 pith:MLXMEZOQ submitted 2025-05-01 eess.IV cs.CV

Aditya Arora , Zhengzhong Tu , Yufei Wang , Ruizheng Bai , Jian Wang , Sizhuo Ma This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.IVcs.CV MSC 68T4568U10
keywords imagesuper-resolutionone-stepdiffusionlatentmodelstructuralfidelityfull-resolutionguidancereal-worldlow-rankadaptationchannelattention
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that diffusion-based super-resolution loses fidelity because it conditions on VAE-downsampled latent codes that discard high-frequency structure, and that this can be fixed by extracting guidance features at the original image resolution and injecting them into a one-step latent diffusion model. Its proposed model, GuideSR, combines a full-resolution Guidance Branch with a LoRA-finetuned one-step Stable Diffusion Turbo branch, and reports state-of-the-art PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, DISTS, and FID on DIV2K-Val, RealSR, and DRealSR while using a single inference step. A sympathetic reader would take the paper's central bet to be: full-resolution feature conditioning, rather than more training or bigger models, is what closes the fidelity gap in single-step diffusion SR.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a dual-branch architecture. The Guidance Branch runs at full resolution: a shallow convolution extracts features, a chain of Full Resolution Blocks (residual-in-residual blocks with channel attention) refines them, and an Image Guidance Network applies guided attention to output a refined image and enriched features. Those features are downsampled by pixel-unshuffle (rearranging spatial values into channels, so no information is discarded) and concatenated into the UNet encoder at multiple scales, while a long-skip connection lets the UNet predict only a residual latent. The Diffusion Branch is a pretrained Stable Diffusion Turbo finetuned with LoRA (rank 8 on UNet, rank 4 on VAE), with zero-conv skip connections between VAE encoder and decoder, and trained with a weighted MSE+LPIPS+GAN loss supervised on both branch outputs. The key move is that guidance information enters at full resolution and is preserved through pixel-unshuffle rather than through lossy VAE encoding.

What would settle it

Train GuideSR twice with identical losses, data, and budget, but in one version replace the pixel-unshuffled Guidance Branch features with VAE-encoded features of the same size (or with a bilinear-downsampled full-resolution map). If the PSNR gap on DRealSR shrinks to near zero, the full-resolution mechanism, not the dual-branch training, is the source of the gain. A second check: run the Guidance Branch alone with the same losses; if it matches the dual-branch PSNR, the diffusion branch is not contributing.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

GuideSR's central claim is that replacing VAE-latent conditioning with full-resolution feature guidance solves the fidelity bottleneck of one-step diffusion super-resolution. The Guidance Branch processes the degraded image at its original resolution with Full Resolution Blocks and an Image Guidance Network, then pixel-unshuffles the features to latent resolution and concatenates them into the UNet encoder of a LoRA-finetuned Stable Diffusion Turbo model. A long-skip connection makes the UNet predict only a residual latent. On DIV2K-Val, RealSR, and DRealSR the method reports higher PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, DISTS, and FID than both multi-step (StableSR, DiffBIR, SeeSR, PASD, ResShift) and one-step (SinSR, OSEDiff) baselines, with the largest gain on DRealSR (1.39 dB over ResShift). The paper argues this shows structural fidelity and generative quality are not in conflict when the generative branch receives high-frequency guidance.

Load-bearing premise

The central premise is that full-resolution pixel-unshuffled features carry high-frequency structure that VAE downsampling loses, and that this information, not the extra training or the long-skip connection, is what drives the fidelity gains.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • One-step diffusion SR can exceed multi-step methods on reference-based fidelity metrics, so 15-200 step inference is not necessary for state-of-the-art fidelity.
  • Full-resolution feature concatenation is a viable alternative to ControlNet-style conditioning for restoration, preserving structure without extra controllers.
  • The method improves real-world SR fidelity most on challenging datasets, suggesting full-resolution guidance generalizes beyond synthetic degradations.
  • The same dual-branch recipe may transfer to other latent-space generative restoration tasks that currently use VAE-latent conditioning.
  • With one-step inference, the restored output quality is available at near-GAN-level cost, making diffusion SR practical for deployment if memory footprint is addressed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not isolate how much of the gain comes from pixel-unshuffle versus the adversarial training, the extra long-skip, or the LoRA finetune; a fair test would match all other variables and vary only the conditioning representation, and that test is not reported.
  • Pixel-unshuffle preserves all spatial values, so the Guidance Branch likely provides information that VAE encoding genuinely discards; if so, the same trick could improve other latent diffusion restoration tasks such as deblurring, deraining, or low-light enhancement.
  • The 1.39 dB gain on DRealSR over ResShift, a 15-step method, is large enough that reproducing it with an independent implementation would be a strong check; if it shrinks under matched training budgets, the architecture's contribution may be smaller than claimed.
  • One testable extension: feed the Guidance Branch features to a non-diffusion regressor with the same losses and see whether the diffusion branch adds perceptual value or mostly inherits the guidance branch's fidelity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. GuideSR is a single-step diffusion-based super-resolution model with a dual-branch design. The Guidance Branch processes the degraded input at full resolution using Full Resolution Blocks and an Image Guidance Network, producing a refined image R2 and multi-scale features that are pixel-unshuffled and concatenated into the UNet encoder of a LoRA-finetuned Stable Diffusion Turbo model. The Diffusion Branch operates in latent space and produces the final output R1, aided by a long-skip connection and zero-convolution skip connections from the VAE encoder to the decoder. Training uses a combined MSE, LPIPS, and GAN loss on both branches with weights 0.9 and 0.1 for R1 and R2, respectively. Experiments on DIV2K-Val, RealSR, and DRealSR show consistent gains over seven baselines in PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, DISTS, and FID, including a 1.39 dB PSNR improvement on DRealSR over ResShift, while no-reference metrics (NIQE, MUSIQ, MANIQA, CLIPIQA) are worse for GuideSR, attributed to the perception-distortion tradeoff. The paper's central claim is that full-resolution guidance features, as opposed to VAE-downsampled conditioning, preserve high-frequency structure and drive the reported fidelity gains.

Significance. If the reported gains are reproducible, GuideSR offers a practical advance: state-of-the-art full-reference fidelity at single-step inference cost, and the idea of injecting pixel-unshuffled full-resolution features into a latent diffusion UNet is a plausible mechanism for improving fidelity. The paper is thorough in benchmarking seven baselines across three datasets with six reference-based metrics, and it honestly reports no-reference metrics even though they are worse. However, the central mechanism is not isolated in the ablations, the architecture is not fully specified, and the closest related method (ClearSR) is not compared quantitatively. The significance is therefore contingent on additional experiments that directly test the guidance mechanism.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.3, Table 2] The ablation in Table 2 does not isolate the contribution of the full-resolution guidance mechanism. The row 'Baseline + Guidance' (26.82 dB) differs from 'Baseline + Long-skip' (26.80 dB) by two components (Guidance vs. Long-skip), so the 0.02 dB difference is not a controlled comparison; the full model's 0.28 dB gain over 'Baseline + Long-skip' adds both Guidance and IGN simultaneously. There is no row 'Baseline + Long-skip + Guidance (without IGN)', no row 'Baseline + Long-skip + IGN', and no control that injects an equally informative low-level signal (e.g., a pixel-unshuffled copy of the input image or a VAE-encoded latent) at the same concatenation points. Consequently, the reported 1.39 dB PSNR gain on DRealSR cannot be attributed to the proposed full-resolution guidance; it could be due to the added parameters, the IGN, or the long-skip. Please add the missing control rows and report metrics beyond PSNR (SSIM, LPIPS, DISTS, FID) in the ablation.
  2. [Section 3.1, Eq. (3)] The downsampling factor s in Eq. (3) is not specified, and the text does not state at which UNet encoder scales the features F'_r are concatenated or how the channel dimensions are matched between the pixel-unshuffled features and the UNet encoder outputs. The statement that pixel-unshuffle 'preserves all values' does not distinguish it from other downsampling operations; without a control comparing pixel-unshuffled guidance against VAE-encoded guidance at the same injection points, the paper does not establish that the proposed mechanism retains high-frequency structure better than the standard conditioning it criticizes. Please specify s, the injection scales, and the channel alignment, and add the corresponding control experiment.
  3. [Section 4.1, Table 1] The paper cites ClearSR [39] as related work but does not include it in the quantitative comparison. Given that ClearSR is described as also providing latent low-resolution embeddings to help diffusion-based super-resolution 'see clearer', it is the closest published method to GuideSR; omitting it from Table 1 leaves the state-of-the-art claim unsubstantiated. Please either add a quantitative comparison on the shared benchmarks or explicitly justify its exclusion (e.g., if the test protocols differ).
minor comments (8)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a grammatical error: 'and (2) a Diffusion Branch, which a pre-trained latent diffusion model to enhance perceptual quality' should read 'which uses a pre-trained latent diffusion model to enhance perceptual quality'.
  2. [Section 4, Datasets] The text says 'paried LQ and 512×512 HQ images'; 'paried' should be 'paired'.
  3. [Section 3.3] The sentence 'We utilizes dual discriminators' should be 'We utilize dual discriminators'.
  4. [Section 4.1] In the DIV2K-Val paragraph, 'surpassing the best previous method (ResShift) by 0.11dB and 0.0152' should specify that these are PSNR and SSIM gains, respectively.
  5. [Section 3.2, Eq. (4)] The fixed timestep t_f is not given; please state its value and how it was selected.
  6. [Section 4.1, Table 1] The paper does not state whether the baseline numbers in Table 1 are taken from the original papers or re-evaluated under a common protocol; please clarify this to assess fairness of the comparison.
  7. [Section 4.1] The abstract's 'state-of-the-art performance' is qualified in the body as applying to reference-based metrics; however, on no-reference metrics (NIQE, MUSIQ, MANIQA, CLIPIQA) GuideSR is consistently worse than several baselines. Please adjust the abstract or add an explicit qualifying phrase to avoid overclaiming.
  8. [General] No code or checkpoints are released. Given the reproducibility concerns raised in the major comments, the authors should release code and model weights upon acceptance.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: GuideSR reports measured benchmark gains from a trained architecture, not predictions forced by fitted parameters or by self-citation.

full rationale

GuideSR's load-bearing claim is that its dual-branch architecture achieves state-of-the-art fidelity on DIV2K-Val, RealSR, and DRealSR. That claim is supported by Table 1, where PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, DISTS, and FID are measured on held-out benchmark sets after training with fixed loss weights (lambda1 = 1.0, lambda2 = 5.0, lambda3 = 0.5; lambdad = 0.9, lambdag = 0.1). No model parameter is fitted to the evaluation metrics, and no reported number is obtained by inverting the evaluation criterion. The pixel-unshuffle operation in Eq. 3 is an architectural construction, not a definition of the reported metric gains; the paper's claim that VAE downsampling loses high-frequency structure is a motivating hypothesis that is tested empirically through the Table 2 ablation rather than assumed in the derivation. The ablation is incomplete as an isolation of the full-resolution guidance mechanism, since no control row separates Guidance from Long-skip and IGN, but that is an experimental-validation weakness, not circularity. The paper does contain self-citations: SinSR [43] includes co-author Yufei Wang, CoDi [28] includes co-author Zhengzhong Tu, and Light the Night [21] includes co-author Zhengzhong Tu. These are used as related-work context and as comparison baselines, not as the evidence that GuideSR works, so they are not load-bearing. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz-smuggling citation, or definitional equivalence was found. The Limitations section only discusses inference-time memory and future directions, and none of the manuscript's claims reduce by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central empirical result rests on hand-selected hyperparameters and several domain assumptions about degradation transfer, metric reliability, and the behavior of pretrained diffusion priors. No new physical entities are introduced; the FRB and IGN modules are architectural compositions, not independently falsifiable entities.

free parameters (4)
  • Loss weights lambda_1, lambda_2, lambda_3, lambda_d, lambda_g = 1.0, 5.0, 0.5, 0.9, 0.1
    Hand-set weights in Eqs. (6)-(8); no sensitivity study is reported.
  • LoRA ranks = r=8 for UNet, r=4 for VAE
    Chosen for parameter efficiency; no sweep or analysis of rank sensitivity.
  • Fixed timestep t_f for one-step diffusion = not reported
    The diffusion branch is conditioned on a single timestep, but its value is not stated, so the exact recipe cannot be reproduced.
  • Training schedule and crop size = learning rate 5e-5, 100k iterations, 256x256 crops
    Hand-selected training configuration following common practice; no ablation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Real-ESRGAN degradation pipeline used to synthesize LR training data is representative enough for real-world test sets such as RealSR and DRealSR.
    Section 4, Datasets paragraph: training LR is synthesized with Real-ESRGAN degradation; evaluation includes real paired images, with no domain-gap analysis.
  • domain assumption A pretrained Stable Diffusion Turbo v2.1 can serve as a single-step generative prior after LoRA fine-tuning with the stated loss.
    Section 3.2, Diffusion Branch: the paper assumes the fixed timestep and LoRA updates retain enough generative capability for realistic texture synthesis.
  • standard math Full-reference metrics (PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, DISTS, FID) and no-reference metrics are reliable indicators of SR quality on these test sets.
    Section 4.1: FID on small real-world sets is sensitive to sample size, which is not reported; no statistical significance is attached to any metric.
  • domain assumption The VAE encoder of Stable Diffusion loses structural fidelity when encoding degraded low-quality inputs.
    Introduction and Section 3.1: this motivates the Guidance Branch, but the paper does not directly measure the claimed VAE degradation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of GuideSR: Rethinking Guidance for One-Step High-Fidelity Diffusion-Based Super-Resolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MLXMEZOQ

@misc{pith2026250500687,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: GuideSR: Rethinking Guidance for One-Step High-Fidelity Diffusion-Based Super-Resolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MLXMEZOQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.00687}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we propose GuideSR, a novel single-step diffusion-based image super-resolution (SR) model specifically designed to enhance image fidelity. Existing diffusion-based SR approaches typically adapt pre-trained generative models to image restoration tasks by adding extra conditioning on a VAE-downsampled representation of the degraded input, which often compromises structural fidelity. GuideSR addresses this limitation by introducing a dual-branch architecture comprising: (1) a Guidance Branch that preserves high-fidelity structures from the original-resolution degraded input, and (2) a Diffusion Branch, which a pre-trained latent diffusion model to enhance perceptual quality. Unlike conventional conditioning mechanisms, our Guidance Branch features a tailored structure for image restoration tasks, combining Full Resolution Blocks (FRBs) with channel attention and an Image Guidance Network (IGN) with guided attention. By embedding detailed structural information directly into the restoration pipeline, GuideSR produces sharper and more visually consistent results. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate that GuideSR achieves state-of-the-art performance while maintaining the low computational cost of single-step approaches, with up to 1.39dB PSNR gain on challenging real-world datasets. Our approach consistently outperforms existing methods across various reference-based metrics including PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, DISTS and FID, further representing a practical advancement for real-world image restoration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.00687 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Architecture comparison of diffusion-based super￾resolution approaches. (a) Standard diffusion process (e.g., OSEDiff [46]) processes latent representations directly; (b) Controller-based methods (e.g., DiffBIR [26], SeeSR [45], Sta￾bleSR [40]) employ conditional mechanisms to guide the diffusion process; (c) Our proposed GuideSR introduces a dual-branch ar￾chitecture with full-resolution feature guidance, preservin… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of GuideSR architecture. Our method introduces a dual-branch architecture where the Guidance Branch (top) processes full-resolution input to preserve high-frequency details, while the Diffusion Branch (bottom) operates in the latent space for enhanced perceptual quality. The Guidance Branch applies a series of Full Resolution Blocks (FRBs) and an Image Guidance Network (IGN) to output a refined image R2, wh… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Multi-metric performance visualization. We visualize the performance of different SR methods, displaying reference-based metrics (PSNR, SSIM, LPIPS, DISTS, FID) on the left and no-reference metrics (CLIPIQA, MANIQA, MUSIQ) on the right. Our GuideSR model prioritizes fidelity, consistently achieving the best reference-based metrics across all datasets. It does not lead in no-reference metrics due to the perception-di… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Pixel-Space Fidelity (MSE) and Feature-Space Fi￾delity (LPIPS). Enhancing both MSE and LPIPS is generally challenging because boosting generative capabilities often in￾creases feature-space fidelity and enhances the realism of restored images, but usually at the cost o…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visual Comparison on Real-World Images from RealSR [3] and DRealSR [44]. (Top) GuideSR accurately restores detailed features such as the text shape and the reflections on metal surfaces. (Middle) GuideSR correctly reconstructs the geometry of the concrete blocks, while…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 4KAgent: Agentic Any Image to 4K Super-Resolution

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    An agentic pipeline that plans and executes image restoration from a toolbox of pretrained models to upscale arbitrary images to 4K, reporting state-of-the-art results on many benchmarks.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [39]

    Clearsr: Latent low-resolution image embeddings help diffusion-based real- world super resolution models see clearer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14279, 2024

    Yuhao Wan, Peng-Tao Jiang, Qibin Hou, Hao Zhang, Jin- wei Chen, Ming-Ming Cheng, and Bo Li. Clearsr: Latent low-resolution image embeddings help diffusion-based real- world super resolution models see clearer.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.14279, 2024. 2

    arXiv

  2. [1]

    Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study

    Eirikur Agustsson and Radu Timofte. Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pat- tern recognition workshops, pages 126–135, 2017. 6

    work page 2017

  3. [2]

    The perception-distortion tradeoff

    Yochai Blau and Tomer Michaeli. The perception-distortion tradeoff. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 6228–6237, 2018. 6, 8

    work page 2018

  4. [3]

    Toward real-world single image super-resolution: A new benchmark and a new model

    Jianrui Cai, Hui Zeng, Hongwei Yong, Zisheng Cao, and Lei Zhang. Toward real-world single image super-resolution: A new benchmark and a new model. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3086–3095, 2019. 6, 7, 8

    work page 2019

  5. [4]

    Activating more pixels in image super- resolution transformer

    Xiangyu Chen, Xintao Wang, Jiantao Zhou, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Activating more pixels in image super- resolution transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 22367–22377, 2023. 1

    work page 2023

  6. [5]

    Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database

    Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 248–255. Ieee, 2009. 5

    2009

  7. [6]

    Genie: Higher-order denoising diffusion solvers.Advances in Neu- ral Information Processing Systems, 35:30150–30166, 2022

    Tim Dockhorn, Arash Vahdat, and Karsten Kreis. Genie: Higher-order denoising diffusion solvers.Advances in Neu- ral Information Processing Systems, 35:30150–30166, 2022. 2

    work page 2022

  8. [7]

    Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution

    Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. Learning a deep convolutional network for image super-resolution. InComputer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, Proceedings, Part IV 13, pages 184–199. Springer,

    2014

Show all 55 references
  1. [8]

    Image and video upscal- ing from local self-examples.ACM Transactions on Graph- ics (ToG), 30(2):1–11, 2011

    Gilad Freedman and Raanan Fattal. Image and video upscal- ing from local self-examples.ACM Transactions on Graph- ics (ToG), 30(2):1–11, 2011. 1

    2011

  2. [9]

    Super- resolution from a single image

    Daniel Glasner, Shai Bagon, and Michal Irani. Super- resolution from a single image. In2009 IEEE 12th interna- tional conference on computer vision, pages 349–356. IEEE,

  3. [10]

    Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 1, 2

    2020

  4. [11]

    Snapgen: Tam- ing high-resolution text-to-image models for mobile devices with efficient architectures and training.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09619, 2024

    Dongting Hu, Jierun Chen, Xijie Huang, Huseyin Coskun, Arpit Sahni, Aarush Gupta, Anujraaj Goyal, Dishani Lahiri, Rajesh Singh, Yerlan Idelbayev, et al. Snapgen: Tam- ing high-resolution text-to-image models for mobile devices with efficient architectures and training.arXiv pr...

    2024 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685, 2021

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen- Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685, 2021. 4

    2021 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Tfmq-dm: Temporal feature maintenance quantization for diffusion models

    Yushi Huang, Ruihao Gong, Jing Liu, Tianlong Chen, and Xianglong Liu. Tfmq-dm: Temporal feature maintenance quantization for diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 7362–7371, 2024. 2, 8

    2024

  7. [14]

    A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks

    Tero Karras, Samuli Laine, and Timo Aila. A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 4401–4410, 2019. 5

    2019

  8. [15]

    Denoising diffusion restoration models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:23593–23606,

    Bahjat Kawar, Michael Elad, Stefano Ermon, and Jiaming Song. Denoising diffusion restoration models.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:23593–23606,

  9. [16]

    Bk-sdm: A lightweight, fast, and cheap ver- sion of stable diffusion

    Bo-Kyeong Kim, Hyoung-Kyu Song, Thibault Castells, and Shinkook Choi. Bk-sdm: A lightweight, fast, and cheap ver- sion of stable diffusion. InEuropean Conference on Com- puter Vision, pages 381–399. Springer, 2024. 2, 8

    2024

  10. [17]

    Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional net- works

    Jiwon Kim, Jung Kwon Lee, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional net- works. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1646–1654, 2016. 1

    2016

  11. [18]

    Ensembling off-the-shelf models for gan training

    Nupur Kumari, Richard Zhang, Eli Shechtman, and Jun-Yan Zhu. Ensembling off-the-shelf models for gan training. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vi- sion and pattern recognition, pages 10651–10662, 2022. 6

    2022

  12. [20]

    Photo- realistic single image super-resolution using a generative ad- versarial network

    Christian Ledig, Lucas Theis, Ferenc Husz´ar, Jose Caballero, Andrew Cunningham, Alejandro Acosta, Andrew Aitken, Alykhan Tejani, Johannes Totz, Zehan Wang, et al. Photo- realistic single image super-resolution using a generative ad- versarial network. InProceedings of the IEE...

  13. [21]

    Light the night: A multi-condition diffusion framework for unpaired low-light enhancement in autonomous driving

    Jinlong Li, Baolu Li, Zhengzhong Tu, Xinyu Liu, Qing Guo, Felix Juefei-Xu, Runsheng Xu, and Hongkai Yu. Light the night: A multi-condition diffusion framework for unpaired low-light enhancement in autonomous driving. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Visio...

    2024

  14. [22]

    Q-diffusion: Quantizing diffusion models

    Xiuyu Li, Yijiang Liu, Long Lian, Huanrui Yang, Zhen Dong, Daniel Kang, Shanghang Zhang, and Kurt Keutzer. Q-diffusion: Quantizing diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vi- sion, pages 17535–17545, 2023. 2, 8

    2023

  15. [23]

    Swinir: Image restoration us- ing swin transformer

    Jingyun Liang, Jiezhang Cao, Guolei Sun, Kai Zhang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Swinir: Image restoration us- ing swin transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF inter- national conference on computer vision, pages 1833–1844,

  16. [24]

    Details or artifacts: A locally discriminative learning approach to realistic im- age super-resolution

    Jie Liang, Hui Zeng, and Lei Zhang. Details or artifacts: A locally discriminative learning approach to realistic im- age super-resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5657–5666, 2022. 1

    2022

  17. [25]

    Sdxl- lightning: Progressive adversarial diffusion distillation

    Shanchuan Lin, Anran Wang, and Xiao Yang. Sdxl- lightning: Progressive adversarial diffusion distillation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13929, 2024. 5 9

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Diffbir: Towards blind image restoration with generative diffusion prior.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15070, 2023

    Xinqi Lin, Jingwen He, Ziyan Chen, Zhaoyang Lyu, Ben Fei, Bo Dai, Wanli Ouyang, Yu Qiao, and Chao Dong. Diffbir: Towards blind image restoration with generative diffusion prior.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.15070, 2023. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Dpm-solver: A fast ode solver for diffusion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:5775–5787,

    Cheng Lu, Yuhao Zhou, Fan Bao, Jianfei Chen, Chongxuan Li, and Jun Zhu. Dpm-solver: A fast ode solver for diffusion probabilistic model sampling in around 10 steps.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:5775–5787,

  20. [28]

    Codi: conditional diffusion distillation for higher-fidelity and faster image generation

    Kangfu Mei, Mauricio Delbracio, Hossein Talebi, Zhengzhong Tu, Vishal M Patel, and Peyman Milanfar. Codi: conditional diffusion distillation for higher-fidelity and faster image generation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pa...

    2024

  21. [29]

    On distillation of guided diffusion models

    Chenlin Meng, Robin Rombach, Ruiqi Gao, Diederik Kingma, Stefano Ermon, Jonathan Ho, and Tim Salimans. On distillation of guided diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pat- tern Recognition, pages 14297–14306, 2023. 2

    2023

  22. [30]

    Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models

    Alexander Quinn Nichol and Prafulla Dhariwal. Improved denoising diffusion probabilistic models. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8162–8171. PMLR,

  23. [31]

    One-step image translation with text-to-image models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12036, 2024

    Gaurav Parmar, Taesung Park, Srinivasa Narasimhan, and Jun-Yan Zhu. One-step image translation with text-to-image models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.12036, 2024. 4

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models

    Robin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser, and Bj ¨orn Ommer. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022. 2

    2022

  25. [33]

    Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:36479–36494, 2022

    Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Jay Whang, Emily L Denton, Kamyar Ghasemipour, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Tim Salimans, et al. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding.Advances in Neural Information ...

    2022

  26. [34]

    Image super-resolution via iterative refinement.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(4):4713– 4726, 2022

    Chitwan Saharia, Jonathan Ho, William Chan, Tim Sal- imans, David J Fleet, and Mohammad Norouzi. Image super-resolution via iterative refinement.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(4):4713– 4726, 2022. 2

    2022

  27. [35]

    Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00512, 2022

    Tim Salimans and Jonathan Ho. Progressive distillation for fast sampling of diffusion models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.00512, 2022. 2

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Fast high- resolution image synthesis with latent adversarial diffusion distillation

    Axel Sauer, Frederic Boesel, Tim Dockhorn, Andreas Blattmann, Patrick Esser, and Robin Rombach. Fast high- resolution image synthesis with latent adversarial diffusion distillation. InSIGGRAPH Asia 2024 Conference Papers, pages 1–11, 2024. 6

    2024

  29. [37]

    Adversarial diffusion distillation

    Axel Sauer, Dominik Lorenz, Andreas Blattmann, and Robin Rombach. Adversarial diffusion distillation. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 87–103. Springer,

  30. [38]

    Denoising diffusion implicit models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020

    Jiaming Song, Chenlin Meng, and Stefano Ermon. Denoising diffusion implicit models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020. 2

    2010 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Exploiting diffusion prior for real-world image super-resolution.International Journal of Computer Vision, pages 1–21, 2024

    Jianyi Wang, Zongsheng Yue, Shangchen Zhou, Kelvin CK Chan, and Chen Change Loy. Exploiting diffusion prior for real-world image super-resolution.International Journal of Computer Vision, pages 1–21, 2024. 1, 2, 5, 6

    2024

  32. [41]

    Esrgan: En- hanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks

    Xintao Wang, Ke Yu, Shixiang Wu, Jinjin Gu, Yihao Liu, Chao Dong, Yu Qiao, and Chen Change Loy. Esrgan: En- hanced super-resolution generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) workshops, pages 0–0, 2018. 1

    2018

  33. [42]

    Real-esrgan: Training real-world blind super-resolution with pure synthetic data

    Xintao Wang, Liangbin Xie, Chao Dong, and Ying Shan. Real-esrgan: Training real-world blind super-resolution with pure synthetic data. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF inter- national conference on computer vision, pages 1905–1914,

    1905

  34. [43]

    Sinsr: Diffusion-based image super- resolution in a single step.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.14760,

    Yufei Wang, Wenhan Yang, Xinyuan Chen, Yaohui Wang, Lanqing Guo, Lap-Pui Chau, Ziwei Liu, Yu Qiao, Alex C Kot, and Bihan Wen. Sinsr: Diffusion-based image super- resolution in a single step.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.14760,

    arXiv

  35. [44]

    Component divide- and-conquer for real-world image super-resolution

    Pengxu Wei, Ziwei Xie, Hannan Lu, Zongyuan Zhan, Qixi- ang Ye, Wangmeng Zuo, and Liang Lin. Component divide- and-conquer for real-world image super-resolution. InCom- puter Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glas- gow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part VIII 1...

    2020

  36. [45]

    Seesr: Towards semantics- aware real-world image super-resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16518, 2023

    Rongyuan Wu, Tao Yang, Lingchen Sun, Zhengqiang Zhang, Shuai Li, and Lei Zhang. Seesr: Towards semantics- aware real-world image super-resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.16518, 2023. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7

    2023 arXiv

  37. [46]

    One-step effective diffusion network for real-world image super-resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08177, 2024

    Rongyuan Wu, Lingchen Sun, Zhiyuan Ma, and Lei Zhang. One-step effective diffusion network for real-world image super-resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08177, 2024. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7

    2024 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Tack- ling the generative learning trilemma with denoising diffu- sion gans.arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.07804, 2021

    Zhisheng Xiao, Karsten Kreis, and Arash Vahdat. Tack- ling the generative learning trilemma with denoising diffu- sion gans.arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.07804, 2021. 5

    2021 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Ufogen: You forward once large scale text-to-image gener- ation via diffusion gans

    Yanwu Xu, Yang Zhao, Zhisheng Xiao, and Tingbo Hou. Ufogen: You forward once large scale text-to-image gener- ation via diffusion gans. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8196–8206, 2024. 5

    2024

  40. [49]

    Pixel-aware stable diffusion for realistic image super- resolution and personalized stylization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14469, 2023

    Tao Yang, Peiran Ren, Xuansong Xie, and Lei Zhang. Pixel-aware stable diffusion for realistic image super- resolution and personalized stylization.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14469, 2023. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7

    2023 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Resshift: Efficient diffusion model for image super-resolution by residual shifting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12348, 2023

    Zongsheng Yue, Jianyi Wang, and Chen Change Loy. Resshift: Efficient diffusion model for image super-resolution by residual shifting.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12348, 2023. 3, 5, 6, 7

    2023 arXiv

  42. [51]

    Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind 10 image super-resolution

    Kai Zhang, Jingyun Liang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timo- fte. Designing a practical degradation model for deep blind 10 image super-resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4791– 4800, 2021. 1

    2021

  43. [52]

    Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models

    Lvmin Zhang, Anyi Rao, and Maneesh Agrawala. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3836–3847, 2023. 2

    2023

  44. [53]

    The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric

    Richard Zhang, Phillip Isola, Alexei A Efros, Eli Shecht- man, and Oliver Wang. The unreasonable effectiveness of deep features as a perceptual metric. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recogni- tion, pages 586–595, 2018. 7

    2018

  45. [54]

    Efficient long-range attention network for image super- resolution

    Xindong Zhang, Hui Zeng, Shi Guo, and Lei Zhang. Efficient long-range attention network for image super- resolution. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 649–667. Springer, 2022. 1

    2022

  46. [55]

    Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks

    Yulun Zhang, Kunpeng Li, Kai Li, Lichen Wang, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks. InProceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 286–301, 2018. 1

    2018

  47. [56]

    Recognize anything: A strong image tagging model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.03514,

    Youcai Zhang, Xinyu Huang, Jinyu Ma, Zhaoyang Li, Zhaochuan Luo, Yanchun Xie, Yuzhuo Qin, Tong Luo, Yaqian Li, Shilong Liu, et al. Recognize anything: A strong image tagging model.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.03514,

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.