$\mathbb{Z}_2^3$-grading of the Lie algebra $G_2$ and related color algebras

J. Van der Jeugt; N.I. Stoilova

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

$\mathbb{Z}_2^3$-grading of the Lie algebra $G_2$ and related color algebras

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs a 14-element basis for the exceptional Lie algebra G2, indexed by Fano-plane geometry, that realizes G2 as a Z_2^3-graded Lie algebra and yields three distinct colorings.

desk verdict A genuinely useful, explicit Z2^3 basis for G2 with clean commutators plus three new color algebras; the proof gap flagged by the skeptic is real but minor because the Chevalley-basis identification checks out. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.04378 v1 pith:2RM3TUWY submitted 2025-05-07 math-ph math.GRmath.MPmath.RA

N.I. Stoilova , J. Van der Jeugt This is my paper · ORCID

classification math-phmath.GRmath.MPmath.RA MSC 17B2517B7017A35 PACS 03.65.-w03.65.Fd02.20.-a11.10.-z

keywords Z_2^3-gradingG2exceptionalLiealgebraFanoplanecoloralgebrasoctonionsCartan-Weylbasisgraded

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs a uniform basis for the 14-dimensional exceptional Lie algebra G2, indexed by the points and lines of the Fano plane, which makes G2 a $Z_2^{3}$-graded Lie algebra: every nonzero degree carries exactly two basis elements, and their commutators are given by a single closed-form rule. The authors prove that this 14-dimensional algebra is G2 by two routes: the basis elements act as derivations of the octonions, and the basis matches a known Chevalley-type basis. They then use the grading to build three different $Z_2^{3}$-graded color algebras of type G2, all of graded-Lie rather than graded-superalgebra type, and a further $Z_2^{2}$-grading compatible with a Cartan-Weyl basis that also admits a color algebra. The value for a reader is that the explicit basis and bracket tables turn a classical exceptional object into a working graded structure that can be plugged into $Z_2^{3}$-graded quantum-mechanical or vertex-model constructions.

What carries the argument

The central object is the family $A^\zeta_\alpha$ inside the space of $8\times 8$ matrices graded by $\Gamma = \mathbb{Z}_2^3$: $\alpha$ is the degree (a nonzero triple, drawn as a point of the Fano plane) and $\zeta$ is a line through that point ($\zeta \in \alpha^\perp$, i.e., $(\alpha|\zeta)=0$). The oriented Fano plane fixes the octonion signs $\sigma$ and the line $\ell(\alpha,\beta)$ through two points; these enter the three-case commutator formula (2.18). The identity $\sum_{\zeta\in\alpha^\perp} A^\zeta_\alpha = 0$ is what cuts the 21 generators to 14, and the commutator formula is what makes the structure closed and uniform. The octonion-derivation action is what finally identifies the algebra as $G_2$.

What would settle it

Compute $A^\lambda_\alpha(x \cdot y) = A^\lambda_\alpha(x)\cdot y + x\cdot A^\lambda_\alpha(y)$ for the seven octonion products $e_\alpha\cdot e_\beta = e_\gamma$, $e_\alpha\cdot e_{\beta'} = e_{\gamma'}$, $e_\alpha\cdot e_{\beta''} = e_{\gamma''}$, $e_\beta\cdot e_{\beta'} = e_{\beta''}$, $e_{\beta'}\cdot e_\gamma = e_{\gamma''}$, $e_{\gamma'}\cdot e_\beta = e_{\gamma''}$, and $e_{\gamma'}\cdot e_\gamma = e_{\beta''}$; a single failure shows the algebra generated by the $A^\zeta_\alpha$ is not contained in $\mathrm{Der}(\mathbb{O})$ and hence Proposition 2 does not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Proposition 2: the vector space spanned by the 21 elements $A^\zeta_\alpha$ ($\alpha \in \Gamma^*$, $\zeta \in \alpha^\perp$) modulo the seven relations $\sum_{\zeta \in \alpha^\perp} A^\zeta_\alpha = 0$, with brackets given by (2.17)-(2.18), is the exceptional Lie algebra $G_2$. The bracket formula is uniform: for $\alpha \neq \beta$, $[A^\lambda_\alpha, A^\mu_\beta]$ equals $-2A^\lambda_{\alpha+\beta}$ when both lines equal $\ell(\alpha,\beta)$, equals $A^{\ell(\alpha,\beta)}_{\alpha+\beta}$ when exactly one equals $\ell(\alpha,\beta)$, and equals $A^{\lambda+\mu}_{\alpha+\beta}$ otherwise, with signs governed by the orientation of the Fano plane. The identification with $G_2$ is made by checking that these matrices act as derivations on the octonion algebra and by matching the basis to a known Chevalley basis. The same grading then produces three $\mathbb{Z}_2^3$-graded color Lie algebras of type $G_2$ and a $\mathbb{Z}_2^2$-graded color Lie algebra in a Cartan-Weyl basis.

Load-bearing premise

The identification of the 14-dimensional algebra with $G_2$ rests on the assertion, sketched but not shown in detail, that each basis element acts as a derivation of the octonion product on the seven listed products; if any of those checks fails, the algebra could be a proper subalgebra of the octonion derivations and would not be $G_2$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The $G_2$ commutators can be written uniformly using Fano-plane incidence data, so any computation in the $\mathbb{Z}_2^3$-grading reduces to bookkeeping on the seven points and seven lines.
The grading is non-toral, so no Cartan-Weyl basis can be homogeneous for it; applications needing roots must pass to the $\mathbb{Z}_2^2$-grading, which the paper supplies explicitly.
Three non-isomorphic-looking $\mathbb{Z}_2^3$-graded color Lie algebras of type $G_2$ exist, all of graded-Lie type, with complete bracket tables ready for use in parastatistics or superconformal models.
A $\mathbb{Z}_2^2$-graded color Lie algebra of type $G_2$ exists in a Cartan-Weyl basis with diagonal Cartan subalgebra, making it directly usable in representations where roots are needed.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the three color algebras arise from sign changes that preserve homogeneity while the underlying sign factors are equivalent as commutation factors, the paper leaves open whether the color algebras in (3.7) and (3.10) are isomorphic; a direct isomorphism test would sharpen the list.
The same Fano-plane construction likely adapts to the exceptional superalgebra $G(3)$, whose even part is $G_2$, by replacing octonion derivations with super-derivations; the paper points toward this as a next step.
The uniform commutator formula invites a degree-by-degree computation of invariants such as cohomology or Casimir elements using only the incidence geometry of the Fano plane, which may be simpler than working with structure constants.
A concrete testable extension is to write the $N=7$ superconformal quantum mechanics symmetry algebra in this graded basis, as the authors suggest, which would either produce a $\mathbb{Z}_2^3$-graded version of that model or reveal obstructions to grading it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper delivers what it promises: an explicit, uniform basis for G2 graded by Z2^3, with a closed-form commutator formula (2.18), and three new Z2^3-graded color algebras of type G2 plus one Z2^2-graded color algebra in a Cartan-Weyl basis. The Z2^3-grading itself is not new (credited to [20,27,28]), but the presentation is clean and the explicit brackets will save workers in parastatistics and superconformal mechanics real time. The Chevalley-basis identification in Section 2 is the load-bearing part, and it is solid: matching (2.25)-(2.26) to the Appendix and Table 1 of [32] is an independent, checkable route to Proposition 2. The derivation-of-octonions proof is genuinely sketched, with seven products left to the reader; the stress-test note is right to flag that. But because the Chevalley comparison is explicit and complete, the omission is a proof gap, not an unproven claim. The color algebras are new constructions, not a classification, and the paper says so plainly. The sign-factor subtlety around (2.18) is worth a small fix; the conditional ordering sigma(alpha,beta,alpha+beta)=+1 is stated but easy to miss. A reader who wants to use these brackets should get the formula restated as: first order the arguments to make sigma +1, then apply (2.18). This is a minor presentation issue. The paper is heavily computational in the color sections, but the authors are honest that they checked by computer algebra and encourage hand verification; the lists are reproducible from the displayed matrices. The citation pattern is fair: prior grading results are credited, and comparisons to [20,27,28] are explicit rather than rhetorical. Who should read this: mathematical physicists working on Z2^n-graded structures, parastatistics, or G2 applications, and anyone who needs a concrete graded basis rather than an existence statement. A serious referee should engage with it; the referee's main job is to verify a sample of the bracket lists and confirm the Chevalley identification, not to hunt for a hidden flaw. I recommend acceptance with minor revision: display or explicitly cite a file for the derivation checks, and clarify the ordering convention in (2.18).

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a Z2^3-graded basis for the exceptional Lie algebra G2. For each nonzero degree α in Z2^3, it defines three matrices A^ζ_α labeled by the three Fano-plane lines ζ through α, subject to one relation per α, so that the 21 objects reduce to 14 basis elements. Proposition 1 gives a uniform closed commutator formula (2.17)-(2.18) for these elements, and Proposition 2 identifies the resulting 14-dimensional Lie algebra with G2, via two sketched proofs: one using derivations of the octonions and one by matching an explicit Cartan-Weyl basis to the standard G2 commutator table. The paper then defines color algebras over Z2^3 and presents three explicit bracket tables, all with sign factors of type 3_2, as examples of Z2^3-graded color Lie algebras of type G2. Finally, a Z2^2-graded color Lie algebra of type G2 compatible with a Cartan-Weyl basis is constructed with explicit 7x7 matrices and a full bracket list.

Significance. If correct, the paper gives a compact, uniform presentation of a non-toral Z2^3-grading of G2 that is directly tied to the Fano plane, complementing earlier classification results in [20] with an explicit basis and a closed commutator formula. The color-algebra examples are fully explicit and should be usable in applications where graded versions of exceptional symmetries are needed. Strengths include the absence of fitted parameters, the use of external benchmarks (Der(O) and the Chevalley table of [32]) rather than circular reasoning, and the authors' honest statement of limitations. The main reservations concern completeness of one proof and the unsupported terminology "three different" for the color algebras.

major comments (2)

[Section 2.2, Proposition 2] The first proof of Proposition 2 is incomplete as written: after (2.20) the paper states that it is sufficient to check that A^λ_α acts as a derivation on seven listed products, but the checks are not displayed. Since Proposition 2 is the central structural claim, please either include the seven verifications (a short table would suffice) or state explicitly that they were verified symbolically and make that verification available. I do not regard this as an error, because the second proof via the explicit basis (2.25)-(2.26) and the Appendix table is an independent identification with G2, but the first proof is currently only a sketch.
[Abstract and Section 3] The paper claims in the abstract and in Section 5 that it yields three different Z2^3-graded color algebras of type G2, but no proof of non-isomorphism is given. In fact, at the end of Section 3.2 the authors state that they have not been able to establish a color-algebra isomorphism between (3.7) and (3.10). Since the three sign factors (3.5), (3.8) and (3.11) are related by coordinate permutations of Z2^3, the three constructions may well be isomorphic as color algebras. Please either prove non-isomorphism, or consistently rephrase the claims as "three explicit examples" without asserting that they are different algebras.

minor comments (4)

[Equation (2.18)] Equation (2.18) is stated under the assumption σ(α,β,α+β)=+1, but the paper does not spell out how to read the formula for the opposite orientation. The proof handles this by swapping α and β, and the explicit table (2.24) uses that convention implicitly; please make the sign convention explicit, for example by including the factor σ(α,β,α+β) in the right-hand side.
[Equation (4.4)] There is a typographical error in the first line of the bracket list: "[h1, h2] = 0 , , [h1, a12]" contains a double comma.
[Section 3, preamble] The phrase "for each possible sign factor" occurring before Section 3.1 overstates the search, which is restricted to sign changes of the matrix entries of (2.23). The later caveat in Section 3 is accurate; please qualify the earlier sentence accordingly.
[Equation (2.24)] The long commutator list (2.24) is asserted to be "easily computed" without any indication of independent verification, whereas Section 3.1 explicitly mentions a computer check for (3.7). For reproducibility, please add a sentence stating whether (2.24) and the Appendix table were also checked by computer, or provide a small verification script.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Proposition 2 is benchmarked against external octonion-derivation and Chevalley-basis data, not against its own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Proposition 2, is that the 14-dimensional bracket algebra defined by (2.17)-(2.18) is G2. This is not circular. The construction begins with explicit 8x8 matrices A^zeta_alpha defined in (2.15) as linear combinations of so(7) basis elements, and Proposition 1 derives the commutator formula (2.18) directly from the standard so(7) commutators (2.11). Proposition 2 then offers two independent identifications: the first identifies the algebra with Der(O), using the known external theorem Der(O) = G2, and the second matches the explicitly computed commutator table with the Chevalley basis table of [32]. Even though [32] is by the same authors, it is used as a parameter-free external benchmark table, not as an assumption whose conclusion is the target result, and the octonion-derivation route does not depend on [32] at all. The promised seven derivation checks after (2.20) are not displayed, which is a proof gap or omitted verification, but it is not a circular reduction: no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no claim is assumed by definition. The color algebra sections are explicitly presented as examples found by searching sign changes, and the paper states it does not obtain a classification, so there is no circularity there either. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and externally benchmarked, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or fitted values appear; the paper is a pure algebraic construction. The axioms are standard results in Lie theory and the theory of color algebras, plus the completeness of the sign factor classification from the literature. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The algebra of derivations of the octonions is the 14-dimensional exceptional Lie algebra G2.
Used in the first proof of Proposition 2 (end of Section 2.2) to identify the algebra generated by the A matrices with G2.
standard math The bracket defined on an associative algebra by {x_α, y_β} = x_α y_β - (-1)^{<α,β>} y_β x_α automatically satisfies the color Jacobi identity.
Invoked in Section 3 to assert that the explicitly listed color algebra brackets satisfy Jacobi because they come from matrix products.
domain assumption The list of inequivalent sign factors for Z2^3 given in [18, Appendix A] and [3] is complete.
The paper relies on this classification to restrict its search for compatible color algebras to the five types 3_1, 3_2, 3_3, 3_4, and 3_5.
standard math The Fano plane labeling of Γ* satisfies the stated incidence properties, including lines through a point, labels of lines, and orientation signs σ.
The construction of the basis A^ζ_α and the commutator formula (2.18) depend on these properties.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $\mathbb{Z}_2^3$-grading of the Lie algebra $G_2$ and related color algebras." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2RM3TUWY

@misc{pith2026250504378,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $\mathbbZ_2^3$-grading of the Lie algebra $G_2$ and related color algebras},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2RM3TUWY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.04378}
}

abstract

We present a special and attractive basis for the exceptional Lie algebra $G_2$, which turns $G_2$ into a $\mathbb{Z}_2^3$-graded Lie algebra. There are two basis elements for each degree of $\mathbb{Z}_2^3\setminus\{(0,0,0)\}$, thus yielding 14 basis elements. We give a general and simple closed form expression for commutators between these basis elements. Next, we use this $\mathbb{Z}_2^3$-grading in order to examine graded color algebras. Our analysis yields three different $\mathbb{Z}_2^3$-graded color algebras of type $G_2$. Since the $\mathbb{Z}_2^3$-grading is not compatible with a Cartan-Weyl basis of $G_2$, we also study another grading of $G_2$. This is a $\mathbb{Z}_2^2$-grading, compatible with a Cartan-Weyl basis, and for which we can also construct a $\mathbb{Z}_2^2$-graded color algebra of type $G_2$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.04378 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The oriented Fano plane, with the 7 points labeled b [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

A Superalgebra Within: representations of lightest standard model particles form a $\mathbb{Z}_2^5$-graded algebra
hep-ph 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

Standard Model particle representations (minus top-quark irreps) are shown to fit into a Z2^5-graded Jordan superalgebra H_16(C) generated by division algebras.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[32]

Lie Theory 33 1005–1008

Stoilova N I and Van der Jeugt J 2023 The Exceptional Lie A lgebra g2 is Generated by Three Generators Subject to Quadruple Relations J. Lie Theory 33 1005–1008

work page 2023
[20]

Draper C and Mart ´ ın C 2006 Gradings on g2 Linear Alg. Appl. 418 85–111

work page 2006
[1]

Rittenberg V and Wyler D 1978 Generalized Superalgebras Nucl. Phys. B 139 189-202

work page 1978
[2]

Rittenberg V and Wyler D 1978 Sequences of Z2 ⊕ Z2-graded Lie algebras and superalgebras J. Math. Phys. 19 2193-2200

work page 1978
[3]

Scheunert M 1979 Generalized Lie algebras J. Math. Phys. 20 712–720

work page 1979
[4]

Lukierski J and Rittenberg V 1978 Color-de Sitter and col or-conformal superalgebras Phys. Rev. D 18 385-389

work page 1978
[5]

Quantum Grav

Vasiliev M A 1985 de Sitter supergravity with positive co smological constant and generalized Lie superalgebras Class. Quantum Grav. 2 645-659

work page 1985
[6]

Aizawa N, Kuznetsova Z, Tanaka H and Toppan F 2016 Z2 × Z2-graded Lie symmetries of the L´ evy-Leblond equationsProg. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016 123A01

work page 2016

Show all 35 references

[7]

Bruce A J and Duplij S 2020 Double-graded supersymmetric quantum mechanics J. Math. Phys. 61 063503

2020
[8]

Aizawa N, Amakawa K and Doi S 2020 N -Extension of double-graded supersymmetric and superconformal quantum mechanics J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 53 065205

2020
[9]

Aizawa N, Kuznetsova Z and Toppan F 2021 Z2 × Z2-graded mechanics: the quantization Nucl. Phys. B 967 115426

2021
[10]

Quesne C 2021 Minimal bosonization of double-graded qu antum mechanics Mod. Phys. Lett. A 36 2150238

2021
[11]

Doi S and Aizawa N 2022 Irreducible representations of Z2 2-graded N = 2 supersymmetry algebra and Z2 2-graded supermechanics J. Math. Phys. 63 091704 16

2022
[12]

Stoilova N I and Van der Jeugt J 2023 On classical Z2 × Z2-graded Lie algebras J. Math. Phys. 64 061702

2023
[13]

Stoilova N I and Van der Jeugt J 2024 Orthosymplectic Z2 × Z2-graded Lie superalgebras and parastatistics, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 57 095202

2024
[14]

Toppan F 2019 The octonionically-induced N = 7 exceptional G(3) superconformal quantum mechanics arXiv: 1912.05596 [hep-th]

2019 arXiv
[15]

Aizawa N, Kuznetsova Z and Toppan F 2018 The quasi-nonas sociative exceptional F (4) de- formed quantum oscillator J. Math. Phys. 59 022101

2018
[16]

Doi S and Aizawa N 2021 Z3 2-Graded Extensions of Lie Superalgebras and Superconforma l Quantum Mechanics SIGMA 17 071

2021
[17]

Aizawa N, Amakawa K and Doi S 2020 Zn 2 -graded extensions of supersymmetric quantum mechanics via Cliﬀord algebras J. Math. Phys. 61 052105

2020
[18]

Balbino M M, de Freitas I P, Rana R G and Toppan F 2024 Inequ ivalent Zn 2 -graded brackets, n- bit parastatistics and statistical transmutations of supe rsymmetric quantum mechanics, Nucl. Phys. B 1009 116729

2024
[19]

Elduque A and Kochetov M V 2013 Gradings on simple Lie algebras Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 189 (Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society)

2013
[21]

Algebra 37 885–893

Bahturin Y and Tvalavadze M V 2009 Group gradings on G2 Comm. Algebra 37 885–893

2009
[22]

Calder´ on Mart ´ ın A J, Draper C and Mart ´ ın Gonz´ alez C 2010 Gradings on the real forms of the Albert algebra, of g2, and of f4 J. Math. Phys. 51 053516

2010
[23]

Algebra 512 382–426

Elduque A and Kochetov M 2018 Gradings on the simple real Lie algebras of types G2 and D4 J. Algebra 512 382–426

2018
[24]

https://mathworld.wolfram.com/FanoPlane.html

Weisstein E W Fano Plane From MathWorld–A Wolfram Web Resource. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/FanoPlane.html
[25]

Polster B 1999 Yea why try her raw wet hat: A tour of the sma llest projective space The Mathematical Intelligencer 21 38–43

1999
[26]

Baez J C 2002 The Octonions Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 39 145–205

2002
[27]

Draper C 2024 The compact exceptional Lie algebra gc 2 as a twisted group ring Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 152 3679–3688

2024
[28]

Carr´ egalo F C and Draper C 2024 New Lie algebras over the group Z3 2 arXiv: 2501.02492 [math.RA]

2024 arXiv
[29]

Martins M J 2023 The spectrum properties of an integrabl e G2 invariant vertex model Nucl. Phys. B 989 116131

2023
[30]

Algebra 207 342–354

Elduque A 1998 Gradings on Octonions J. Algebra 207 342–354

1998
[31]

Frappat L, Sciarrino A and Sorba P 2000 Dictionary on Lie Algebras and Superalgebras (San Diego: Academic Press) 17

2000
[33]

Japan Acad., Ser

Kobayashi Y, Nagamachi S and Miyamoto H 1983 Lie Groups a nd Lie algebras with generalized Bose-Fermi Symmetric Parameters Proc. Japan Acad., Ser. A 59 203–206

1983
[34]

Toppan F 2021 Z2 × Z2-graded parastatistics in multiparticle quantum Hamilton ians J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54 115203

2021
[35]

Toppan F 2021 Inequivalent quantizations from grading s and Z2 × Z2 parabosons J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 54 355202 18

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [32]

Lie Theory 33 1005–1008

Stoilova N I and Van der Jeugt J 2023 The Exceptional Lie A lgebra g2 is Generated by Three Generators Subject to Quadruple Relations J. Lie Theory 33 1005–1008

work page 2023

[2] [20]

Draper C and Mart ´ ın C 2006 Gradings on g2 Linear Alg. Appl. 418 85–111

work page 2006

[3] [1]

Rittenberg V and Wyler D 1978 Generalized Superalgebras Nucl. Phys. B 139 189-202

work page 1978

[4] [2]

Rittenberg V and Wyler D 1978 Sequences of Z2 ⊕ Z2-graded Lie algebras and superalgebras J. Math. Phys. 19 2193-2200

work page 1978

[5] [3]

Scheunert M 1979 Generalized Lie algebras J. Math. Phys. 20 712–720

work page 1979

[6] [4]

Lukierski J and Rittenberg V 1978 Color-de Sitter and col or-conformal superalgebras Phys. Rev. D 18 385-389

work page 1978

[7] [5]

Quantum Grav

Vasiliev M A 1985 de Sitter supergravity with positive co smological constant and generalized Lie superalgebras Class. Quantum Grav. 2 645-659

work page 1985

[8] [6]

Aizawa N, Kuznetsova Z, Tanaka H and Toppan F 2016 Z2 × Z2-graded Lie symmetries of the L´ evy-Leblond equationsProg. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016 123A01

work page 2016