REVIEW 3 cited by
A Pain Assessment Framework based on multimodal data and Deep Machine Learning methods
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
From the original abstract: This thesis initially aims to study the pain assessment process from a clinical-theoretical perspective while exploring and examining existing automatic approaches. Building on this foundation, the primary objective of this Ph.D. project is to develop innovative computational methods for automatic pain assessment that achieve high performance and are applicable in real clinical settings. A primary goal is to thoroughly investigate and assess significant factors, including demographic elements that impact pain perception, as recognized in pain research, through a computational standpoint. Within the limits of the available data in this research area, our goal was to design, develop, propose, and offer automatic pain assessment pipelines for unimodal and multimodal configurations that are applicable to the specific requirements of different scenarios. The studies published in this Ph.D. thesis showcased the effectiveness of the proposed methods, achieving state-of-the-art results. Additionally, they paved the way for exploring new approaches in artificial intelligence, foundation models, and generative artificial intelligence.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
An Exploratory Analysis of Pain Localization via Explainable Computational Modeling
On the AI4Pain 2026 dataset, Extra Trees with 115 hand-crafted features (macro-F1 0.539) beats deep sequence models (0.465), and pain localization (0.552) is far harder than pain detection (0.815).
-
ReFace: Reorganizing Facial Spatiotemporal Representations for Improved Pain Assessment
Reorganizing facial video into four channel-concatenated quadrants before tokenization yields 56.00% test accuracy on AI4Pain video-only pain classification, the highest reported under that benchmark protocol.
-
A Unified Tokenization Framework for Pain Recognition using Heterogeneous 3D Modalities
A unified tokenizer maps facial video and fNIRS into one token space; the segment-latent transformer hits 57.33% test accuracy on AI4Pain pain recognition.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.