Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

XMM-Newton Conclusively Identifies an Active Galactic Nucleus in a Green Pea Galaxy

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the X-ray changes seen in the Green Pea galaxy J0822+2241 can only be explained by a low-luminosity active galactic nucleus hidden behind a cloud of gas that thickened tenfold between 2013 and 2020.

desk verdict Strong multi-wavelength case for an AGN in a Green Pea galaxy, though the 'only plausible' variable-obscuration scenario is not uniquely established with two epochs. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.08885 v1 pith:W5GW4J35 submitted 2025-05-13 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE

Peter G. Boorman (1 , 2) , Jiří Svoboda (2) , Daniel Stern (3) , Bret D. Lehmer (4 , 5) , Abhijeet Borkar (2) , Murray Brightman (1)
show 43 more authors
Hannah P. Earnshaw (1) Fiona A. Harrison (1) Konstantinos Kouroumpatzakis (2) Barbora Adamcová (2) Roberto J. Assef (6) Matthias Ehle (7) Brian Grefenstette (1) Romana Grossová (2 8) Maitrayee Gupta (2) Elias Kammoun (1) Taiki Kawamuro (9) Lea Marcotulli (10 11 1) Romana Mikušincová (12) Matthew J. Middleton (13) Edward Nathan (1) Joanna M. Piotrowska (1) Jean J. Somalwar (1) Núria Torres-Albà (14) Dominic J. Walton (15) Daniel R. Weisz (16) ((1) Caltech (2) Astronomical Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences (3) Jet Propulsion Laboratory (4) Department of Physics University of Arkansas (5) Arkansas Center for Space Planetary Sciences (6) Universidad Diego Portales (7) European Space Agency (8) Masaryk University (9) Osaka University (10) Yale Center for Astronomy Astrophysics (11) Department of Physics Yale University (12) INAF Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali (13) University of Southampton (14) University of Virginia (15) University of Hertfordshire (16) University of California Berkeley)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords GreenPeagalaxiesactivegalacticnucleiX-rayspectroscopyobscurationvariabilityXMM-Newtonlow-luminosityAGNreionisationanaloguesultraluminoussources
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the deepest X-ray campaign of a Green Pea galaxy to date, targeting SDSS J082247.66+224144.0. Across two XMM-Newton epochs separated by 6.2 years in the galaxy's rest frame, the hard 2-10 keV luminosity stayed constant near $10^{42}$ erg/s while the soft 0.5-2 keV flux dropped by about 60%. After testing transient supernovae, unresolved X-ray binaries, ultraluminous X-ray sources, and unobscured AGN variability, the authors conclude that only an AGN whose line-of-sight gas column increased by roughly a factor of ten can explain the data. If correct, this is the first conclusive X-ray identification of an AGN in a Green Pea galaxy, supporting the idea that low-luminosity black hole accretion in compact star-forming galaxies could have contributed to cosmic reionisation.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a two-epoch X-ray spectral fit with an absorbed powerlaw model (zTBabs*cabs*zpowerlw), in which the intrinsic photon index is tied to Gamma = 1.7 across both epochs while the line-of-sight column density NH is allowed to vary independently in each epoch. Bayesian posterior sampling with nested sampling propagates the full covariance between the two column density measurements into a single posterior on the ratio NH,2/NH,1, and integrating the probability mass above unity gives the >99.7% confidence in an obscuration increase. Quantile-Quantile difference plots, which compare cumulative detected counts to model-predicted counts without binning, quantify the significance of the soft-band spectral change and confirm that neither epoch's model can reproduce the other epoch's data below 2 keV.

What would settle it

A third X-ray observation that finds the soft 0.5-2 keV flux recovering toward its 2013 level while the 2-10 keV luminosity remains at $10^{42}$ erg/s would contradict the simple obscuration interpretation, since the column would have to both rise and fall on a timescale shorter than the 6.2-year gap. Conversely, a new measurement showing the hard luminosity changing by more than the quoted uncertainties while the soft flux stays suppressed would also falsify the constant-intrinsic-continuum assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Out of all the scenarios tested, an AGN displaying obscuration variability is the only appropriate possibility to explain the X-ray properties of J0822+2241 observed by XMM-Newton. The source's rest-frame 2-10 keV luminosity was constant within uncertainties between 2013 and 2020, while its 0.5-2 keV flux decreased significantly, hardening the observed spectrum from a photon index near 1.7 to about 0.8. A simultaneous spectral fit that ties the intrinsic photon index at Gamma = 1.7 and lets only the line-of-sight column density vary between epochs finds log(NH,2/NH,1) = 1.08+0.66-0.72, with the increase in obscuration required at more than 99.7% confidence. The paper also identifies a broad component to H-alpha with FWHM 1360 km/s in the archival SDSS spectrum, argues it is stable over a 16-year rest-frame baseline, and uses the radio-to-X-ray ratio from VLA data to further support an AGN origin. A fundamental requirement is that the AGN dominates the observed X-ray spectrum below 10 keV, a condition that is rare among highly star-forming galaxies.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes the AGN's intrinsic X-ray spectrum stayed exactly the same shape from 2013 to 2020 while only the amount of absorbing gas on the line of sight changed, and with just two epochs of data, an intrinsic spectral change could mimic the claimed obscuration increase.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • J0822+2241 becomes the first Green Pea galaxy with a conclusive X-ray identification of an AGN, giving astronomers a local, well-studied analogue for interpreting X-ray-faint AGN candidates at high redshift.
  • The constant hard X-ray luminosity implies a stable, low-luminosity AGN near 10^42 erg/s, meaning its observed soft-band variability is dominated by gas crossing the line of sight rather than by intrinsic changes in accretion power.
  • The Eddington ratio estimate of roughly 1.4% places the source near the effective Eddington limit on dusty gas, a regime associated with radiation-pressure-driven outflows and changing obscuration.
  • The broad H-alpha component that persists across a ~16 year rest-frame baseline supports an AGN broad line region rather than a single supernova event.
  • J0822+2241's broad H-alpha and X-ray luminosities sit about 1-2 dex below local AGN scaling relations, matching the X-ray deficit seen in JWST-detected AGN candidates and suggesting that dedicated X-ray campaigns on Green Pea galaxies could clarify that population's nature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If a larger sample of Green Pea galaxies shows the same two-epoch pattern of a steady hard X-ray band and a fading soft band, obscuration variability would become a generic test for low-luminosity AGN in compact star-forming galaxies rather than a single-object oddity.
  • The ~6 year rest-frame timescale of the column density change constrains the obscuring gas to be fairly close to the black hole; dense clumps or an outflow on sub-parsec scales could reproduce the observed change, and monitoring over additional epochs would directly test whether the column continues to rise, stays high, or returns.
  • Because the photon index is tied rather than free, a natural stress test is to let Gamma vary independently between epochs in the same Bayesian framework; the posterior on NH,2/NH,1 would then quantify how much of the inferred obscuration increase is tied to the constant-slope assumption.
  • The results suggest a concrete search strategy: a shallow X-ray snapshot of a Green Pea galaxy that shows a hard spectrum (Gamma below about 1.0) and a bright 2-10 keV luminosity could be a sign of ongoing or recent obscuration, making such objects high-value targets for follow-up spectroscopy above 10 keV.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper presents a multi-epoch X-ray study of the Green Pea galaxy SDSS J082247.66+224144.0 using archival and new XMM-Newton observations separated by 6.2 rest-frame years. The authors find that the 2–10 keV luminosity is consistent between epochs while the 0.5–2 keV flux drops by about 60%, and that the observed photon index hardens from Γ≈1.7 to Γ≈0.8. They then fit a simultaneous absorbed power-law model with a common intrinsic photon index and epoch-dependent line-of-sight column density, reporting an increase in NH from log NH≈20.7 to ≈21.8 cm−2 at >99.7% confidence. Supporting analyses detect a broad Hα component (FWHM≈1360 km/s), perform broadband SED fitting with an AGN component, derive black hole and stellar masses, and compare the source with JWST-selected AGN that lack X-ray detections. The paper concludes that an AGN with transient low-column-density obscuration is the only plausible explanation for the X-ray properties, making J0822+2241 the first conclusively identified X-ray AGN in a Green Pea galaxy.

Significance. If the identification holds, this is an important result: it provides a local template for low-luminosity AGN in compact, low-metallicity star-forming galaxies and supports the idea that such AGN could contribute to reionisation. The study is methodologically careful in several ways: spectral fitting uses Bayesian nested sampling with posterior predictive checks, the NH-ratio significance is checked with a beta-function fit, the epoch-1 NH lower bound is explicitly treated as unconstrained, and the multi-wavelength evidence (broad Hα, SED, radio-to-X-ray ratio) is assembled with appropriate caveats. The main weakness is that the variability mechanism is inferred from a model that assumes the intrinsic continuum is identical between epochs; with only two epochs this assumption is not tested against plausible alternatives, so the 'only plausible scenario' wording is stronger than the data warrant.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1, Table 2] The central inference of an obscuration increase is conditional on the assumption that the intrinsic AGN continuum is a power law with a single photon index Γ=1.7 in both epochs. The independent fits in Section 3.1 give Γ=1.7+0.5−0.6 in epoch 1 and Γ=0.8+0.2−0.3 in epoch 2, so the tied-Γ model is forced to map the spectral change into NH. The paper does not fit or compare a model in which the intrinsic continuum changes between epochs (for example, a free photon index in each epoch, a soft excess present in epoch 1 that fades, or a variable warm/partial-covering absorber). Because the two epochs cannot distinguish these physically distinct interpretations, the statement that variable obscuration is the 'only appropriate possibility' is not supported by the analysis. I recommend adding a model-comparison test and softening the conclusion accordingly.
  2. [Table 1, §3.1] The claim that the hard 2–10 keV luminosity is constant rests on weak epoch-1 hard-band data: Table 1 lists a hard-band signal-to-noise ratio of only 1.8 for epoch 1, and the quoted luminosity has an uncertainty of ±0.3 dex. A factor-of-two change in the hard continuum between epochs is therefore not excluded. This weakens the argument that the soft-band decline must be due to absorption rather than to intrinsic continuum variability, and it should be stated explicitly when the scenarios are compared.
  3. [Abstract and Section 7] The abstract and Section 7 claim that the X-ray properties 'conclusively' identify an AGN and that obscuration variability is the only appropriate possibility. Section 3.1 itself notes that the variability tests are 'purely phenomenological' and do not provide a causal link. The AGN identification is supported by multiple independent diagnostics and may well be correct, but the uniqueness of the obscuration-variability scenario is not established. The language should be revised to distinguish a robust AGN identification from a preferred, but not unique, physical interpretation of the epoch-to-epoch spectral change.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 11 caption] The caption lists '[Oii]λλ4959, 5507', which appears to be a typo for '[Oiii]λλ4959, 5007'; please check and correct.
  2. [Figure 7 caption] The caption refers to the broad Hα measurement as '(c.f. Section 5.1)', but the measurement is presented in Section 3.2.2; the cross-reference should be corrected.
  3. [Section 3.2.2] The equivalent width of the broad Hα component is reported as EWHα,broad = 90+12−10 Å; please state explicitly whether this is in the rest frame or observed frame, for consistency with the other reported quantities.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper fits standard spectral models to X-ray data and compares to external calibrations; the central AGN and obscuration conclusions are model-based inferences, not predictions that reduce to their inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is observational and model-fitting in nature. The claim that the soft X-ray decline is due to an increase in line-of-sight column density is obtained by fitting a two-epoch absorbed power-law model in which Gamma is tied to 1.7 and NH is allowed to vary (Section 5.1). This is a standard model-dependent measurement, not a prediction made after fitting a parameter to a separate subset. The paper explicitly labels the epoch-to-epoch variability tests as phenomenological and lacking a causal link (Section 3.1), and it presents the variable-obscuration scenario as the most plausible among alternatives (Sections 5.1-5.3 and 7) rather than as a derived consequence of a first-principles chain. External calibrations (Reines et al. 2013 for M_BH, Duras et al. 2020 for bolometric correction, Reines & Volonteri 2015 for the scaling relation) are used as independent benchmarks, with caveats acknowledged. Coauthor citations (Svoboda et al. 2019; Kawamuro et al. 2019; Adamcova et al. 2024; Borkar et al. 2024) supply prior data or calculations that are externally falsifiable and not fitted to the present target. The main weakness -- that two epochs cannot formally distinguish variable NH from intrinsic spectral variability -- is a model-degeneracy or correctness concern, not a circularity, and the paper's own limitations statements support this reading. No equation or parameter reduces, by construction or self-citation, to an input of the same claim.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No ad hoc free parameters are introduced; the fitted model parameters (NH, photon index, normalizations) are the measured outputs. The axioms are standard domain assumptions for AGN spectral analysis, each explicitly invoked in the paper. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The intrinsic AGN X-ray continuum is a powerlaw with a constant photon index (Gamma ~ 1.7) across both epochs.
    Invoked in Section 5.1 and Table 2: simultaneous fits tie the photon index while allowing NH to vary per epoch. If the intrinsic continuum varied, the NH increase could be an artifact.
  • domain assumption The X-ray emission from J0822+2241 is dominated by a single unresolved source at the galaxy center.
    The galaxy is unresolved by XMM (NUV half-light radius 680 pc); scenarios with multiple off-nuclear ULX/HLX are discussed in Section 5.3 and rejected based on population statistics and radio data.
  • domain assumption The broad Halpha component is powered by the AGN broad-line region rather than stellar winds or a supernova.
    Section 3.2.2 argues from equivalent width (90 A) and 16-year stability from Palomar spectroscopy; the paper acknowledges definitive proof requires future observations.
  • domain assumption External scaling relations hold for this low-metallicity galaxy: Reines et al. (2013) Halpha-based BH mass, Duras et al. (2020) bolometric correction, Reines & Volonteri (2015) M_BH-M* relation.
    Used in Sections 3.2.3 and 5.1 to derive BH mass, Eddington ratio, and to contextualize the source. The paper notes extrapolation to low metallicity is uncertain.
  • domain assumption The expected X-ray binary contribution is less than about 20% of the observed 0.5-8 keV luminosity, following Adamcova et al. (2024).
    Used in Section 5.3 to rule out X-ray binary populations as the power source.
  • domain assumption Standard reddening laws and Case B Balmer ratio (Halpha/Hbeta = 2.86) apply for the Balmer decrement extinction correction.
    Section 3.2.3 uses Calzetti et al. (2000) and Osterbrock (1989).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of XMM-Newton Conclusively Identifies an Active Galactic Nucleus in a Green Pea Galaxy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W5GW4J35

@misc{pith2026250508885,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: XMM-Newton Conclusively Identifies an Active Galactic Nucleus in a Green Pea Galaxy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W5GW4J35}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.08885}
}
abstract

Green Pea galaxies are a class of compact, low-mass, low-metallicity star-forming galaxies in the relatively local universe. They are believed to be analogues of high-redshift galaxies that re-ionised the universe and, indeed, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is now uncovering such populations at record redshifts. Intriguingly, JWST finds evidence suggestive of active galactic nuclei (AGN) in many of these distant galaxies, including the elusive Little Red Dots, that broadly lack any detectable X-ray counterparts. Intuitively, one would expect to detect an AGN in their low-redshift analogues with X-rays, yet no study to date has conclusively identified an X-ray AGN within a Green Pea galaxy. Here we present the deepest X-ray campaign of a Green Pea galaxy performed to date, obtained with the goal of discerning the presence of a (potentially low-luminosity) AGN. The target $-$ SDSS J082247.66 +224144.0 (J0822+2241 hereafter) $-$ was previously found to display a comparable X-ray spectral shape to more local AGN ($\Gamma$ $\sim$ 2) and a high luminosity ($L_{2-10\,{\rm keV}}$ $\sim$ 10$^{42}$ erg s$^{-1}$). We show that over 6.2 years (rest-frame), the 2$-$10 keV luminosity of J0822+2241 is constant, whereas the soft 0.5$-$2 keV flux has decreased significantly by $\sim$60%. We discuss possible scenarios to explain the X-ray properties of J0822+2241, finding transient low-column density obscuration surrounding an AGN to be the only plausible scenario. J0822+2241 thus provides further evidence that low-luminosity AGN activity could have contributed to the epoch of reionisation, and that local analogues are useful to derive a complete multi-wavelength picture of black hole growth in high redshift low luminosity AGN.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.08885 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Independent spectral fits to epoch 1 (left) and epoch 2 (right) XMM-Newton data of J0822+2241. The model used for both epochs is a redshifted powerlaw with fixed Galactic absorption, and the hatched shaded regions show the 90% model posterior uncertainty in all panels. The observed spectral shape is harder in epoch 2 than epoch 1, driven predominantly by a drop in flux at energies ≲ 2 keV. The lower panels show the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. presents the results from our spectral fits to the [Sii] λλ6716, 6731 complex of J0822+2241 with our 1–Gaussian and 2–Gaussian models. We find that a single Gaussian line is incapable of explaining the rela￾tively broad base of either [Sii] emission line (see center panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: presents the results from our spectral fits with model (i) and (ii), focused on a zoom-in of the [Nii] and Hα emission line complex. We found that the inflection points between Hα and each [Nii] line were not well reproduced using just the narrow line tem￾plate, result…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: presents our phenomenological fitting to the Hβ line. The fitting process is analogous to our spectral fitting of the [Sii] doublet in Section 3.2.1, in which we trial a single Gaussian model for the Hβ line, followed by a double Gaussian model. For the single Gaussian…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (Left) Broadband SED of J0822+2241 (black circular points with associated 68% errorbars), fit with the Lightning software package. The total model is shown with a dark grey shaded region, whereas the constituent AGN, attenuated stellar and dust components are shown wit…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The local broad line dwarf AGN sample with corresponding best-fit relation and intrinsic scatter between stellar mass and black hole mass from Reines & Volonteri (2015). The black hole mass measured for J0822+2241 us￾ing the broad Hα component identified in the SDSS op…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Left) Simultaneous X-ray spectral fit to the two epochs of data from J0822+2241 using a redshifted power law with variable line-of-sight obscuration between epochs. (Right) Posterior distribution for the logarithmic ratio of column density from epoch 2 to 1. All value…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Each panel shows the observed luminosities of J0822+2241 measured with a diskbb + diskpbb model in different bands, compared to the distributions of peak luminosity found by Walton et al. (2022) for the ULX population in each of 4XMM￾DR10 (left), 2SXPS (center) and CSC…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison between broad Hα luminosity and 2 – 10 keV luminosity measured for J0822+2241 and for the recent compilation of type 1 JWST-detected AGN from Maiolino et al. (2025). We additionally plot two relations between broad Hα luminosity and X-ray luminosity derived…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison between the line profiles measured by SDSS and Palomar/DoubleSpec with thick black and thinner red lines, respectively. From left to right, we show Hβ λ4861, [Oii] λλ4959, 5507, Hα λ6563, [Nii] λλ6548, 6583, Hei λ6678 and [Sii] λλ6716, 6731. After applying …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Two Peas in a Pod: The First Confirmed Dual Active Galactic Nucleus within a Green Pea Galaxy System

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A compact Green Pea galaxy system hosts two resolved, simultaneously accreting supermassive black holes — the first confirmed dual AGN in such a galaxy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

174 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    Genuine Retrieval of the AGN Host Stellar Population (GRAHSP)

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    2024, , 691, A27, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449892

    Adamcov \'a , B., Svoboda , J., Kyritsis , E., et al. 2024, , 691, A27, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449892

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449892 2024

  5. [5]

    L., Georgakakis , A., et al

    Aird , J., Coil , A. L., Georgakakis , A., et al. 2015, , 451, 1892, 10.1093/mnras/stv1062

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1062 2015

  6. [6]

    B., Casey , C

    Akins , H. B., Casey , C. M., Allen , N., et al. 2023, , 956, 61, 10.3847/1538-4357/acef21

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acef21 2023

  7. [7]

    T., Bogd \'a n , \'A ., Kov \'a cs , O

    Ananna , T. T., Bogd \'a n , \'A ., Kov \'a cs , O. E., Natarajan , P., & Hickox , R. C. 2024, , 969, L18, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  8. [8]

    T., Urry , C

    Ananna , T. T., Urry , C. M., Ricci , C., et al. 2022, , 939, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9979

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9979 2022

Show all 174 references
  1. [9]

    M., Gandhi , P., et al

    Annuar , A., Alexander , D. M., Gandhi , P., et al. 2020, , 497, 229, 10.1093/mnras/staa1820

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    2018, in 14th European VLBI Network Symposium & Users Meeting (EVN 2018), 23, 10.22323/1.344.0023

    Argo , M., Coppola , J., Mezcua , M., Earnshaw , H., & Roberts , T. 2018, in 14th European VLBI Network Symposium & Users Meeting (EVN 2018), 23, 10.22323/1.344.0023

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    Arnaud , K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes , 17

    1996

  4. [12]

    L., Gandhi , P., et al

    Asmus , D., Greenwell , C. L., Gandhi , P., et al. 2020, , 494, 1784, 10.1093/mnras/staa766

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    J., Stern , D., Noirot , G., et al

    Assef , R. J., Stern , D., Noirot , G., et al. 2018, , 234, 23, 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa00a

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    J., Walton , D

    Assef , R. J., Walton , D. J., Brightman , M., et al. 2016, , 819, 111, 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/111

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    J., Brightman , M., Walton , D

    Assef , R. J., Brightman , M., Walton , D. J., et al. 2020, , 897, 112, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9814

    2020 doi

  8. [16]

    J., Bauer , F

    Assef , R. J., Bauer , F. E., Blain , A. W., et al. 2022, , 934, 101, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac77fc

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    G., Kulkarni , G., et al

    Asthana , S., Haehnelt , M. G., Kulkarni , G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.15453, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.15453

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    2013 doi

  11. [19]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    2018 doi

  12. [20]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    A., Phillips , M

    Baldwin , J. A., Phillips , M. M., & Terlevich , R. 1981, , 93, 5, 10.1086/130766

    1981 doi

  14. [22]

    2020, , 498, 5284, 10.1093/mnras/staa2684

    Baronchelli , L., Nandra , K., & Buchner , J. 2020, , 498, 5284, 10.1093/mnras/staa2684

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    G., Torres-Alb \`a , N., Annuar , A., et al

    Boorman , P. G., Torres-Alb \`a , N., Annuar , A., et al. 2024 a , Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 11, 1335459, 10.3389/fspas.2024.1335459

    2024

  16. [24]

    G., Stern , D., Assef , R

    Boorman , P. G., Stern , D., Assef , R. J., et al. 2024 b , , 975, 230, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7f56

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    G., Gandhi , P., Buchner , J., et al

    Boorman , P. G., Gandhi , P., Buchner , J., et al. 2025, , 978, 118, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8236

    2025 doi

  18. [26]

    2024, , 687, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348819

    Borkar , A., Grossov \'a , R., Svoboda , J., et al. 2024, , 687, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348819

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    J., Illingworth , G

    Bouwens , R. J., Illingworth , G. D., Oesch , P. A., et al. 2015, , 811, 140, 10.1088/0004-637X/811/2/140

    2015 doi

  20. [28]

    N., & Alexander , D

    Brandt , W. N., & Alexander , D. M. 2015, , 23, 1, 10.1007/s00159-014-0081-z

    2015 doi

  21. [29]

    2023, , 951, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd18a

    Brightman , M., Hameury , J.-M., Lasota , J.-P., et al. 2023, , 951, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd18a

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    2024, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 10, 1292656, 10.3389/fspas.2023.1292656

    Brightman , M., Margutti , R., Polzin , A., et al. 2024, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 10, 1292656, 10.3389/fspas.2023.1292656

    2024

  23. [32]

    C., Trump , J

    Brooks , M., Simons , R. C., Trump , J. R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.07340, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.07340

    2024 doi arXiv

  24. [33]

    Brorby , M., Kaaret , P., Prestwich , A., & Mirabel , I. F. 2016, , 457, 4081, 10.1093/mnras/stw284

    2016 doi

  25. [34]

    2016, BXA: Bayesian X-ray Analysis , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1610.011

    Buchner , J. 2016, BXA: Bayesian X-ray Analysis , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1610.011

    2016

  26. [35]

    2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3001, 10.21105/joss.03001

    ---. 2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3001, 10.21105/joss.03001

    2021 doi

  27. [36]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.05705, 10.48550/arXiv.2309.05705

    Buchner , J., & Boorman , P. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.05705, 10.48550/arXiv.2309.05705

    2023 doi arXiv

  28. [37]

    2014, , 564, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322971

    Buchner , J., Georgakakis , A., Nandra , K., et al. 2014, , 564, A125, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322971

    2014 doi

  29. [38]

    2015, , 802, 89, 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/89

    ---. 2015, , 802, 89, 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/89

    2015 doi

  30. [39]

    2024, , 692, A161, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449372

    Buchner , J., Starck , H., Salvato , M., et al. 2024, , 692, A161, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449372

    2024 doi

  31. [40]

    C., et al

    Calzetti , D., Armus , L., Bohlin , R. C., et al. 2000, , 533, 682, 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  32. [41]

    2004, , 116, 138, 10.1086/381875

    Cappellari , M., & Emsellem , E. 2004, , 116, 138, 10.1086/381875

    2004 doi

  33. [43]

    1979, , 228, 939, 10.1086/156922

    Cash , W. 1979, , 228, 939, 10.1086/156922

    1979 doi

  34. [44]

    G., et al

    Civano , F., Zhao , X., Boorman , P. G., et al. 2024, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 11, 1340719, 10.3389/fspas.2024.1340719

    2024

  35. [45]

    C., Gallo , L., & Ross , R

    Crummy , J., Fabian , A. C., Gallo , L., & Ross , R. R. 2006, , 365, 1067, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09844.x

    2006

  36. [46]

    L., et al

    Dom \' nguez , A., Siana , B., Henry , A. L., et al. 2013, , 763, 145, 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/145

    2013 doi

  37. [48]

    C., Yuan , W., et al

    Dong , X.-B., Ho , L. C., Yuan , W., et al. 2012, , 755, 167, 10.1088/0004-637X/755/2/167

    2012 doi

  38. [49]

    B., Eufrasio , R

    Doore , K., Monson , E. B., Eufrasio , R. T., et al. 2023, , 266, 39, 10.3847/1538-4365/accc29

    2023 doi

  39. [50]

    2004, , 153, 205, 10.1086/421115

    Dov c iak , M., Karas , V., & Yaqoob , T. 2004, , 153, 205, 10.1086/421115

    2004 doi

  40. [51]

    W., Karas , V., & Matt , G

    Dov c iak , M., Muleri , F., Goosmann , R. W., Karas , V., & Matt , G. 2008, , 391, 32, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13872.x

    2008

  41. [52]

    2020, , 636, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    Duras , F., Bongiorno , A., Ricci , F., et al. 2020, , 636, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936817

    2020 doi

  42. [53]

    Dwarkadas , V. V. 2014, , 440, 1917, 10.1093/mnras/stu347

    2014 doi

  43. [55]

    N., Primini , F

    Evans , I. N., Primini , F. A., Miller , J. B., et al. 2020 a , in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 235, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts \#235, 154.05

    2020

  44. [56]

    A., Page , K

    Evans , P. A., Page , K. L., Osborne , J. P., et al. 2020 b , , 247, 54, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7db9

    2020 doi

  45. [57]

    C., Vasudevan , R

    Fabian , A. C., Vasudevan , R. V., & Gandhi , P. 2008, , 385, L43, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00430.x

    2008

  46. [58]

    P., & Bridges , M

    Feroz , F., Hobson , M. P., & Bridges , M. 2009, , 398, 1601, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14548.x

    2009

  47. [59]

    V., & Sargent , W

    Filippenko , A. V., & Sargent , W. L. W. 1988, , 324, 134, 10.1086/165886

    1988 doi

  48. [60]

    1989, , 342, L11, 10.1086/185472

    ---. 1989, , 342, L11, 10.1086/185472

    1989 doi

  49. [61]

    Fitzpatrick , E. L. 1999, , 111, 63, 10.1086/316293

    1999 doi

  50. [63]

    M., et al

    Foord , A., Civano , F., Comerford , J. M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.03839, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.03839

    2024 doi arXiv

  51. [64]

    D., Naoz , S., Zezas , A., & Basu-Zych , A

    Fragos , T., Lehmer , B. D., Naoz , S., Zezas , A., & Basu-Zych , A. 2013, , 776, L31, 10.1088/2041-8205/776/2/L31

    2013 doi

  52. [65]

    2022, , 927, 212, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4fc2

    Franeck , A., W \"u nsch , R., Mart \' nez-Gonz \'a lez , S., et al. 2022, , 927, 212, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4fc2

    2022 doi

  53. [66]

    J., Stern , D., et al

    F \"u rst , F., Walton , D. J., Stern , D., et al. 2017, , 834, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/77

    2017 doi

  54. [67]

    J., et al

    Gabriel , C., Denby , M., Fyfe , D. J., et al. 2004, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 314, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems (ADASS) XIII, ed. F. Ochsenbein , M. G. Allen , & D. Egret , 759

    2004

  55. [68]

    D., Appleton , P

    Gao , Y., Wang , Q. D., Appleton , P. N., & Lucas , R. A. 2003, , 596, L171, 10.1086/379598

    2003 doi

  56. [69]

    P., Mather , J

    Gardner , J. P., Mather , J. C., Abbott , R., et al. 2023, , 135, 068001, 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5

    2023 doi

  57. [70]

    2004, , 349, L7, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07687.x

    Gierli \'n ski , M., & Done , C. 2004, , 349, L7, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07687.x

    2004

  58. [71]

    2021, PyXspec: Python interface to XSPEC spectral-fitting program , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2101.014

    Gordon , C., & Arnaud , K. 2021, PyXspec: Python interface to XSPEC spectral-fitting program , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2101.014

    2021

  59. [72]

    E., & Ho , L

    Greene , J. E., & Ho , L. C. 2004, , 610, 722, 10.1086/421719

    2004 doi

  60. [73]

    E., Labbe , I., Goulding , A

    Greene , J. E., Labbe , I., Goulding , A. D., et al. 2024, , 964, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    2024 doi

  61. [74]

    2022, , 934, L34, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac83a0

    Greenwell , C., Gandhi , P., Lansbury , G., et al. 2022, , 934, L34, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac83a0

    2022 doi

  62. [75]

    2024, , 527, 12065, 10.1093/mnras/stad3964

    Greenwell , C., Gandhi , P., Stern , D., et al. 2024, , 527, 12065, 10.1093/mnras/stad3964

    2024 doi

  63. [76]

    K., Ricci , C., Tortosa , A., et al

    Gupta , K. K., Ricci , C., Tortosa , A., et al. 2021, , 504, 428, 10.1093/mnras/stab839

    2021 doi

  64. [77]

    P., Anderson , J

    Guti \'e rrez , C. P., Anderson , J. P., Hamuy , M., et al. 2017, , 850, 89, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f52

    2017 doi

  65. [78]

    2015, , 575, L16, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525627

    Haardt , F., & Salvaterra , R. 2015, , 575, L16, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525627

    2015 doi

  66. [79]

    N., Reines , A

    Hainline , K. N., Reines , A. E., Greene , J. E., & Stern , D. 2016, , 832, 119, 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/119

    2016 doi

  67. [80]

    2023, , 959, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    Harikane , Y., Zhang , Y., Nakajima , K., et al. 2023, , 959, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    2023 doi

  68. [81]

    A., Craig , W

    Harrison , F. A., Craig , W. W., Christensen , F. E., et al. 2013, , 770, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103

    2013 doi

  69. [82]

    C., & Alexander , D

    Hickox , R. C., & Alexander , D. M. 2018, , 56, 625, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051803

    2018 doi

  70. [83]

    C., Filippenko , A

    Ho , L. C., Filippenko , A. V., Sargent , W. L. W., & Peng , C. Y. 1997, , 112, 391, 10.1086/313042

    1997 doi

  71. [84]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  72. [85]

    L., Belfiore , A., Stella , L., et al

    Israel , G. L., Belfiore , A., Stella , L., et al. 2017, Science, 355, 817, 10.1126/science.aai8635

    2017 doi

  73. [86]

    I., Guseva , N

    Izotov , Y. I., Guseva , N. G., & Thuan , T. X. 2011, , 728, 161, 10.1088/0004-637X/728/2/161

    2011 doi

  74. [87]

    I., Orlitov \'a , I., Schaerer , D., et al

    Izotov , Y. I., Orlitov \'a , I., Schaerer , D., et al. 2016, , 529, 178, 10.1038/nature16456

    2016 doi

  75. [88]

    I., Thuan , T

    Izotov , Y. I., Thuan , T. X., & Guseva , N. G. 2007, , 671, 1297, 10.1086/522923

    2007 doi

  76. [89]

    2001, , 365, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000036

    Jansen , F., Lumb , D., Altieri , B., et al. 2001, , 365, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000036

    2001 doi

  77. [90]

    H., Cohen , M., Masci , F., et al

    Jarrett , T. H., Cohen , M., Masci , F., et al. 2011, , 735, 112, 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/112

    2011 doi

  78. [93]

    M., et al

    Juod z balis , I., Maiolino , R., Baker , W. M., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.03551, 10.48550/arXiv.2504.03551

    2025 doi

  79. [94]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.22791, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.22791

    Kara , E., & Garc \' a , J. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.22791, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.22791

    2025 doi arXiv

  80. [95]

    M., White , S

    Kauffmann , G., Heckman , T. M., White , S. D. M., et al. 2003, , 341, 33, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x

    2003

  81. [96]

    2019, , 881, 48, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2bf6

    Kawamuro , T., Ueda , Y., Ichikawa , K., et al. 2019, , 881, 48, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2bf6

    2019 doi

  82. [98]

    2023 b , , 96, 101672, 10.1016/j.newar.2022.101672

    ---. 2023 b , , 96, 101672, 10.1016/j.newar.2022.101672

    2023

  83. [99]

    D., Onoue , M., Inayoshi , K., et al

    Kocevski , D. D., Onoue , M., Inayoshi , K., et al. 2023, , 954, L4, 10.3847/2041-8213/ace5a0

    2023 doi

  84. [100]

    D., Finkelstein , S

    Kocevski , D. D., Finkelstein , S. L., Barro , G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.03576, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.03576

    2024 doi arXiv

  85. [101]

    2021, , 506, 3079, 10.1093/mnras/stab1917

    Kouroumpatzakis , K., Zezas , A., Maragkoudakis , A., et al. 2021, , 506, 3079, 10.1093/mnras/stab1917

    2021 doi

  86. [102]

    2024, , 688, A159, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449766

    Kouroumpatzakis , K., Svoboda , J., Zezas , A., et al. 2024, , 688, A159, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449766

    2024 doi

  87. [103]

    2018, , 480, 1247, 10.1093/mnras/sty1890

    Kubota , A., & Done , C. 2018, , 480, 1247, 10.1093/mnras/sty1890

    2018 doi

  88. [104]

    R., Harrison , F

    Kulkarni , S. R., Harrison , F. A., Grefenstette , B. W., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2111.15608, 10.48550/arXiv.2111.15608

    2021 doi arXiv

  89. [105]

    2025, , 694, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449593

    Kyritsis , E., Zezas , A., Haberl , F., et al. 2025, , 694, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449593

    2025 doi

  90. [106]

    2023, , 522, 1169, 10.1093/mnras/stad995

    Lefkir , M., Kammoun , E., Barret , D., et al. 2023, , 522, 1169, 10.1093/mnras/stad995

    2023 doi

  91. [107]

    D., Alexander , D

    Lehmer , B. D., Alexander , D. M., Bauer , F. E., et al. 2010, , 724, 559, 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/559

    2010 doi

  92. [108]

    D., Eufrasio , R

    Lehmer , B. D., Eufrasio , R. T., Basu-Zych , A., et al. 2021, , 907, 17, 10.3847/1538-4357/abcec1

    2021 doi

  93. [109]

    D., Garofali , K., Binder , B

    Lehmer , B. D., Garofali , K., Binder , B. A., et al. 2023, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 10, 1293918, 10.3389/fspas.2023.1293918

    2023

  94. [110]

    D., Monson , E

    Lehmer , B. D., Monson , E. B., Eufrasio , R. T., et al. 2024, , 977, 189, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8de7

    2024 doi

  95. [111]

    2024, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 109811, 10.1007/s11433-024-2412-3

    Lin , R., Zheng , Z.-Y., Yuan , F.-T., et al. 2024, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 67, 109811, 10.1007/s11433-024-2412-3

    2024 doi

  96. [112]

    2025, , 980, L34, 10.3847/2041-8213/adaaf1

    Lin , R., Zheng , Z.-Y., Jiang , C., et al. 2025, , 980, L34, 10.3847/2041-8213/adaaf1

    2025 doi

  97. [113]

    C., Dong , X.-B., Yao , S., & Lira , P

    Liu , W.-J., Ho , L. C., Dong , X.-B., Yao , S., & Lira , P. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.12898, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.12898

    2025 doi arXiv

  98. [114]

    2001, , 39, 19, 10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.19

    Loeb , A., & Barkana , R. 2001, , 39, 19, 10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.19

    2001 doi

  99. [115]

    P., Mineo , S., et al

    Luangtip , W., Roberts , T. P., Mineo , S., et al. 2015, , 446, 470, 10.1093/mnras/stu2086

    2015 doi

  100. [116]

    MacKenzie , A. D. A., Roberts , T. P., & Walton , D. J. 2023, Astronomische Nachrichten, 344, e20230028, 10.1002/asna.20230028

    2023 doi

  101. [117]

    J., Garc \' a , J., et al

    Madathil-Pottayil , A., Walton , D. J., Garc \' a , J., et al. 2024, , 534, 608, 10.1093/mnras/stae2104

    2024 doi

  102. [118]

    2024, , 971, 75, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5ce8

    Madau , P., Giallongo , E., Grazian , A., & Haardt , F. 2024, , 971, 75, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5ce8

    2024 doi

  103. [119]

    K., Garc \' a , J

    Madsen , K. K., Garc \' a , J. A., Stern , D., et al. 2024, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 11, 1357834, 10.3389/fspas.2024.1357834

    2024

  104. [120]

    2025, , 538, 1921, 10.1093/mnras/staf359

    Maiolino , R., Risaliti , G., Signorini , M., et al. 2025, , 538, 1921, 10.1093/mnras/staf359

    2025 doi

  105. [121]

    2010, , 408, 234, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17048.x

    Mapelli , M., Ripamonti , E., Zampieri , L., Colpi , M., & Bressan , A. 2010, , 408, 234, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17048.x

    2010

  106. [122]

    G., Krumpe , M., & Nikutta , R

    Markowitz , A. G., Krumpe , M., & Nikutta , R. 2014, , 439, 1403, 10.1093/mnras/stt2492

    2014 doi

  107. [123]

    2020, , 633, A9, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936963

    Martins , F., Schaerer , D., Haemmerl \'e , L., & Charbonnel , C. 2020, , 633, A9, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936963

    2020 doi

  108. [125]

    A., et al

    Matthee , J., Mackenzie , R., Simcoe , R. A., et al. 2023, , 950, 67, 10.3847/1538-4357/acc846

    2023 doi

  109. [126]

    P., & Mart \' -Vidal , I

    Mezcua , M., Lobanov , A. P., & Mart \' -Vidal , I. 2013, , 436, 2454, 10.1093/mnras/stt1738

    2013 doi

  110. [127]

    P., Lobanov , A

    Mezcua , M., Roberts , T. P., Lobanov , A. P., & Sutton , A. D. 2015, , 448, 1893, 10.1093/mnras/stv143

    2015 doi

  111. [128]

    J., Heil , L., Pintore , F., Walton , D

    Middleton , M. J., Heil , L., Pintore , F., Walton , D. J., & Roberts , T. P. 2015, , 447, 3243, 10.1093/mnras/stu2644

    2015 doi

  112. [129]

    B., Doore , K., Eufrasio , R

    Monson , E. B., Doore , K., Eufrasio , R. T., et al. 2023, , 951, 15, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd449

    2023 doi

  113. [130]

    P., Oesch , P

    Naidu , R. P., Oesch , P. A., van Dokkum , P., et al. 2022, , 940, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b22

    2022 doi

  114. [131]

    Nandra , K., & Pounds , K. A. 1994, , 268, 405, 10.1093/mnras/268.2.405

    1994 doi

  115. [132]

    Osterbrock , D. E. 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    1989

  116. [134]

    2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, latest, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    pandas development team, T. 2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, latest, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    2020 doi

  117. [135]

    2025, , 979, 170, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9c64

    Pizzetti , A., Torres-Alb \`a , N., Marchesi , S., et al. 2025, , 979, 170, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9c64

    2025 doi

  118. [136]

    O., Doan , S

    Reefe , M., Sexton , R. O., Doan , S. M., et al. 2023, , 265, 21, 10.3847/1538-4365/acb0d2

    2023 doi

  119. [137]

    E., Greene , J

    Reines , A. E., Greene , J. E., & Geha , M. 2013, , 775, 116, 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/116

    2013 doi

  120. [138]

    E., & Volonteri , M

    Reines , A. E., & Volonteri , M. 2015, , 813, 82, 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/82

    2015 doi

  121. [139]

    J., et al

    Ricci , C., Ueda , Y., Koss , M. J., et al. 2015, , 815, L13, 10.1088/2041-8205/815/1/L13

    2015 doi

  122. [140]

    J., et al

    Ricci , C., Trakhtenbrot , B., Koss , M. J., et al. 2017 a , , 233, 17, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa96ad

    2017 doi

  123. [141]

    2017 b , , 549, 488, 10.1038/nature23906

    ---. 2017 b , , 549, 488, 10.1038/nature23906

    2017 doi

  124. [142]

    T., Temple , M

    Ricci , C., Ananna , T. T., Temple , M. J., et al. 2022, , 938, 67, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8e67

    2022 doi

  125. [143]

    2023, , 959, 27, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0733

    Ricci , C., Ichikawa , K., Stalevski , M., et al. 2023, , 959, 27, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0733

    2023 doi

  126. [144]

    2002, , 571, 234, 10.1086/324146

    Risaliti , G., Elvis , M., & Nicastro , F. 2002, , 571, 234, 10.1086/324146

    2002 doi

  127. [145]

    2011, , 742, L29, 10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/L29

    Rivers , E., Markowitz , A., & Rothschild , R. 2011, , 742, L29, 10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/L29

    2011 doi

  128. [146]

    E., Ellis , R

    Robertson , B. E., Ellis , R. S., Furlanetto , S. R., & Dunlop , J. S. 2015, , 802, L19, 10.1088/2041-8205/802/2/L19

    2015 doi

  129. [147]

    2023, , 522, 1377, 10.1093/mnras/stad943

    Salvaggio , C., Wolter , A., Belfiore , A., & Colpi , M. 2023, , 522, 1377, 10.1093/mnras/stad943

    2023 doi

  130. [148]

    P., & Secrest , N

    Satyapal , S., Abel , N. P., & Secrest , N. J. 2018, , 858, 38, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab7f8

    2018 doi

  131. [149]

    F., & Finkbeiner , D

    Schlafly , E. F., & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, , 737, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  132. [150]

    A., Lin , D., et al

    Servillat , M., Farrell , S. A., Lin , D., et al. 2011, , 743, 6, 10.1088/0004-637X/743/1/6

    2011 doi

  133. [151]

    R., & Giroux , M

    Shapiro , P. R., & Giroux , M. L. 1987, , 321, L107, 10.1086/185015

    1987 doi

  134. [152]

    T., Davies , R

    Shimizu , T. T., Davies , R. I., Koss , M., et al. 2018, , 856, 154, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab09e

    2018 doi

  135. [153]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.18730, 10.48550/arXiv.2406.18730

    Singha , M., Sarmiento , J., Malhotra , S., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.18730, 10.48550/arXiv.2406.18730

    2024 doi arXiv

  136. [154]

    Smith , M. J. S. 2022, XMM-SOC-CAL-TN-0018, 1. https://xmmweb.esac.esa.int/docs/documents/CAL-TN-0018.pdf

    2022

  137. [155]

    Stalevski , M., Fritz , J., Baes , M., Nakos , T., & Popovi \'c , L. C . 2012, , 420, 2756, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19775.x

    2012

  138. [156]

    2016, , 458, 2288, 10.1093/mnras/stw444

    Stalevski , M., Ricci , C., Ueda , Y., et al. 2016, , 458, 2288, 10.1093/mnras/stw444

    2016 doi

  139. [157]

    J., Benford , D

    Stern , D., Assef , R. J., Benford , D. J., et al. 2012, , 753, 30, 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/30

    2012 doi

  140. [158]

    2001, , 365, L18, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000066

    Str \"u der , L., Briel , U., Dennerl , K., et al. 2001, , 365, L18, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000066

    2001 doi

  141. [159]

    R., Hayes , B., & Reines , A

    Sturm , M. R., Hayes , B., & Reines , A. E. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.09791, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.09791

    2025 doi arXiv

  142. [160]

    D., Roberts , T

    Sutton , A. D., Roberts , T. P., Walton , D. J., Gladstone , J. C., & Scott , A. E. 2012, , 423, 1154, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20944.x

    2012

  143. [161]

    2019, , 880, 144, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2b39

    Svoboda , J., Douna , V., Orlitov \'a , I., & Ehle , M. 2019, , 880, 144, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2b39

    2019 doi

  144. [162]

    A., Soria , R., Tennant , A

    Swartz , D. A., Soria , R., Tennant , A. F., & Yukita , M. 2011, , 741, 49, 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/49

    2011 doi

  145. [163]

    2022, , 260, 30, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5f59

    Tanimoto , A., Ueda , Y., Odaka , H., Yamada , S., & Ricci , C. 2022, , 260, 30, 10.3847/1538-4365/ac5f59

    2022 doi

  146. [164]

    Terashima , Y., & Wilson , A. S. 2003, , 583, 145, 10.1086/345339

    2003 doi

  147. [165]

    2020, , 635, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936047

    Torres-Alb \`a , N., Bosch-Ramon , V., & Iwasawa , K. 2020, , 635, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936047

    2020 doi

  148. [166]

    2023, , 678, A154, 10.1051/0004-6361/202345947

    Torres-Alb \`a , N., Marchesi , S., Zhao , X., et al. 2023, , 678, A154, 10.1051/0004-6361/202345947

    2023 doi

  149. [167]

    2021, , 922, 252, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c73

    ---. 2021, , 922, 252, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c73

    2021 doi

  150. [168]

    Turner , M. J. L., Abbey , A., Arnaud , M., et al. 2001, , 365, L27, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000087

    2001 doi

  151. [169]

    G., et al

    \"U bler , H., Maiolino , R., P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez , P. G., et al. 2024, , 531, 355, 10.1093/mnras/stae943

    2024 doi

  152. [170]

    Ueda , Y., Akiyama , M., Hasinger , G., Miyaji , T., & Watson , M. G. 2014, , 786, 104, 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/104

    2014 doi

  153. [171]

    2018, , 236, 17, 10.3847/1538-4365/aab780

    Vianello , G. 2018, , 236, 17, 10.3847/1538-4365/aab780

    2018 doi

  154. [172]

    1979, , 230, 274, 10.1086/157084

    Wachter , K., Leach , R., & Kellogg , E. 1979, , 230, 274, 10.1086/157084

    1979 doi

  155. [173]

    Waddell , S. G. H., Nandra , K., Buchner , J., et al. 2024, , 690, A132, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245572

    2024 doi

  156. [174]

    J., Mackenzie , A

    Walton , D. J., Mackenzie , A. D. A., Gully , H., et al. 2022, , 509, 1587, 10.1093/mnras/stab3001

    2022 doi

  157. [175]

    J., Zoghbi , A., Cackett , E

    Walton , D. J., Zoghbi , A., Cackett , E. M., et al. 2013, , 777, L23, 10.1088/2041-8205/777/2/L23

    2013 doi

  158. [176]

    J., Risaliti , G., Harrison , F

    Walton , D. J., Risaliti , G., Harrison , F. A., et al. 2014, , 788, 76, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/76

    2014 doi

  159. [177]

    A., Coriat , M., Traulsen , I., et al

    Webb , N. A., Coriat , M., Traulsen , I., et al. 2020, , 641, A136, 10.1051/0004-6361/201937353

    2020 doi

  160. [178]

    2010, in P roceedings of the 9th P ython in S cience C onference, ed

    W es M c K inney. 2010, in P roceedings of the 9th P ython in S cience C onference, ed. S t\'efan van der W alt & J arrod M illman, 56 -- 61, 10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a

    2010 doi

  161. [179]

    Willingale , R., Starling , R. L. C., Beardmore , A. P., Tanvir , N. R., & O'Brien , P. T. 2013, , 431, 394, 10.1093/mnras/stt175

    2013 doi

  162. [180]

    2000, , 542, 914, 10.1086/317016

    Wilms , J., Allen , A., & McCray , R. 2000, , 542, 914, 10.1086/317016

    2000 doi

  163. [181]

    I., Papovich , C., et al

    Yang , G., Caputi , K. I., Papovich , C., et al. 2023, , 950, L5, 10.3847/2041-8213/acd639

    2023 doi

  164. [182]

    2017, , 844, 171, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7d4d

    Yang , H., Malhotra , S., Gronke , M., et al. 2017, , 844, 171, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7d4d

    2017 doi

  165. [183]

    G., Adelman , J., Anderson , John E., J., et al

    York , D. G., Adelman , J., Anderson , John E., J., et al. 2000, , 120, 1579, 10.1086/301513

    2000 doi

  166. [184]

    T., et al

    Yue , M., Eilers , A.-C., Ananna , T. T., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.13290, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.13290

    2024 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.