Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Parallel Scaling Law for Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.10475 v1 pith:XEW3BAY3 submitted 2025-05-15 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords scalingparallelmodelcomputationmodelsparametersincreaseincreasing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

It is commonly believed that scaling language models should commit a significant space or time cost, by increasing the parameters (parameter scaling) or output tokens (inference-time scaling). We introduce the third and more inference-efficient scaling paradigm: increasing the model's parallel computation during both training and inference time. We apply $P$ diverse and learnable transformations to the input, execute forward passes of the model in parallel, and dynamically aggregate the $P$ outputs. This method, namely parallel scaling (ParScale), scales parallel computation by reusing existing parameters and can be applied to any model structure, optimization procedure, data, or task. We theoretically propose a new scaling law and validate it through large-scale pre-training, which shows that a model with $P$ parallel streams is similar to scaling the parameters by $O(\log P)$ while showing superior inference efficiency. For example, ParScale can use up to 22$\times$ less memory increase and 6$\times$ less latency increase compared to parameter scaling that achieves the same performance improvement. It can also recycle an off-the-shelf pre-trained model into a parallelly scaled one by post-training on a small amount of tokens, further reducing the training budget. The new scaling law we discovered potentially facilitates the deployment of more powerful models in low-resource scenarios, and provides an alternative perspective for the role of computation in machine learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Structured Recurrent Mixers for Massively Parallelized Sequence Generation

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Structured Recurrent Mixers provide a dual parallel-recurrent representation for sequence models, claiming superior training efficiency, information capacity, and inference throughput over linear complexity alternatives.

  2. ParaThinker: Native Parallel Thinking as a New Paradigm to Scale LLM Test-time Compute

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ParaThinker trains LLMs for native parallel reasoning and reports 7 to 12 percent higher accuracy on math benchmarks over sequential thinking with modest latency overhead.

  3. Grove MoE: Towards Efficient and Superior MoE LLMs with Adjugate Experts

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Grove MoE uses unequal-size adjugate experts with complexity-based activation to run 33B-parameter models at roughly 3.1 to 3.3B active parameters while matching larger open models in benchmarks.

  4. cMoLLM at Scale: Horizontal Scaling Laws for Mixture-of-LLMs

    cs.AI 2026-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A pipeline-level soft mixture of LLM streams implemented as dynamic convolution improves GPT-2-scale perplexity/GLUE/SQuAD, but only at substantially higher compute and without reported ParaScale/AltUp comparisons.

  5. System Report for CCL25-Eval Task 10: SRAG-MAV for Fine-Grained Chinese Hate Speech Recognition

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A Qwen2.5-7B system with task reformulation, self-retrieval augmentation, and multi-round voting scores 37.505 average on STATE ToxiCN, outperforming cited baselines.

Pith tools