Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

UniEval: Unified Holistic Evaluation for Unified Multimodal Understanding and Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.10483 v1 pith:WCIZLUEV submitted 2025-05-15 cs.CV cs.AI

classification cs.CVcs.AI
keywords modelsunifiedevaluationgenerationbenchmarksframeworklackmultimodal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The emergence of unified multimodal understanding and generation models is rapidly attracting attention because of their ability to enhance instruction-following capabilities while minimizing model redundancy. However, there is a lack of a unified evaluation framework for these models, which would enable an elegant, simplified, and overall evaluation. Current models conduct evaluations on multiple task-specific benchmarks, but there are significant limitations, such as the lack of overall results, errors from extra evaluation models, reliance on extensive labeled images, benchmarks that lack diversity, and metrics with limited capacity for instruction-following evaluation. To tackle these challenges, we introduce UniEval, the first evaluation framework designed for unified multimodal models without extra models, images, or annotations. This facilitates a simplified and unified evaluation process. The UniEval framework contains a holistic benchmark, UniBench (supports both unified and visual generation models), along with the corresponding UniScore metric. UniBench includes 81 fine-grained tags contributing to high diversity. Experimental results indicate that UniBench is more challenging than existing benchmarks, and UniScore aligns closely with human evaluations, surpassing current metrics. Moreover, we extensively evaluated SoTA unified and visual generation models, uncovering new insights into Univeral's unique values.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TORUS: A Test of Rendering-Understanding Self-Coherence for Unified Audio Models

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new audio benchmark, TORUS, shows unified audio models are not self-coherent: the best model answers 50.5% of questions about its own generations, below a 63.2% cascaded specialist baseline.

Pith tools