Content Generation Models in Computational Pathology: A Comprehensive Survey on Methods, Applications, and Challenges

Feng Chen; Guanyu Yang; Huazhu Fu; Xiaoming Qi; Xinfeng Zhang; Xinyu Wu; Yuan Zhang

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 235 references

Content Generation Models in Computational Pathology: A Comprehensive Survey on Methods, Applications, and Challenges

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey claims to be the first comprehensive map of content generation models in computational pathology, organizing more than 150 studies into four task families.

desk verdict Useful broad survey with a genuine taxonomy flaw: encoder-only models are listed as generative, contradicting the paper's own scope. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.10993 v2 pith:KVL4D6MR submitted 2025-05-16 eess.IV cs.CV

Yuan Zhang , Xinfeng Zhang , Xiaoming Qi , Xinyu Wu , Feng Chen , Guanyu Yang , Huazhu Fu This is my paper · ORCID

classification eess.IVcs.CV

keywords computationalpathologygenerativemodelsdiffusionadversarialnetworksvision-languagewhole-slideimagessyntheticdataliteraturesurvey

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to establish that content generation models have become a distinct, fast-growing methodological paradigm in computational pathology, and that the field is now mature enough to be surveyed under one taxonomy. It claims to be the first comprehensive survey of this area, covering more than 150 publications up to July 2025 and organizing them into four task families: image generation, text generation, molecular profile–morphology generation, and other specialized generation tasks. The review matters because pathology images are gigapixel, annotation-heavy, and heterogeneous, so the ability to synthesize realistic tissue, virtual stains, diagnostic reports, and molecular readouts could lower the cost of data, improve model robustness, and open archival slides to molecular analysis. The paper's contribution is the structure itself: a taxonomy, a dataset inventory, and a statement of the barriers that stand between current models and clinical deployment.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the proposed taxonomy together with the definition of generative capacity. A model counts as a content generation model only if it has a decoder that can produce new images or text; encoder-only contrastive models are explicitly excluded. The taxonomy then sorts the field into four generation targets — image, text, molecular profile–morphology, and other — with sub-tasks under each, and the survey uses this grid to compare architectures (GAN/VAE, diffusion, LLM/VLM) across applications, datasets, and evaluation protocols. The taxonomy is what lets the review claim to be a reference framework rather than a list of papers.

What would settle it

A reader could assemble an independent bibliography of content-generation papers in computational pathology published before July 2025 and check whether a substantial number of peer-reviewed works fall outside the four taxonomy categories or are absent from the survey's list of over 150 studies; finding such a body would refute the comprehensiveness claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that content generation in computational pathology is best understood as a family of tasks unified by a single criterion: the presence of a decoder that synthesizes new images or text, which separates generative models from encoder-only or contrastive foundation models. On that basis the survey proposes a four-part taxonomy — image synthesis (augmentation, mask-guided generation, artifact restoration, resolution scaling, text-to-image, stain synthesis), text generation (captioning, visual question answering, report generation, abstraction), molecular profile–morphology generation (virtual molecular profiling and reverse morphology synthesis), and other tasks (spatial layout, semantic outputs, latent representations, cell simulation). It traces an architectural arc from variational autoencoders and GANs through diffusion models to generative vision-language models, and argues that since roughly 2024 the field has shifted from proof-of-concept synthesis toward task-oriented and clinically motivated generation. The paper also claims that the main obstacles are now the fidelity of whole-slide image synthesis, the absence of pathology-specific evaluation metrics, computational cost, and unresolved ethical, legal, and regulatory questions.

Load-bearing premise

The comprehensiveness claim rests on the literature search described in Supplementary Materials Section II, which is not included in this preprint; if that search missed a substantial body of relevant work, the survey's value as a complete reference would be weakened.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A newcomer can use the taxonomy to locate any pathology generation method and its nearest alternatives, which shortens the path from problem statement to candidate architecture.
The survey's division of labor — GANs for speed, diffusion for fidelity, VLMs for language — gives practitioners a first-pass selection rule when choosing a generation model for a task.
The identified gap in pathology-specific evaluation metrics implies that reported FID/SSIM improvements do not yet translate into clinical claims; standardized benchmarks are a prerequisite for comparing methods.
The proposed future of generative foundation models would unify image, text, and molecular generation in one system, making cross-modal tasks such as gene-to-image synthesis a single-model capability.
The catalogued datasets, including synthetic benchmarks like SNOW and PathGen-1.6M, provide the raw material for reproducing or extending most surveyed methods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the taxonomy's categories are the right ones, testable predictions follow: methods developed for one sub-task in a family, such as cycle-consistency in stain transfer, should transfer to other sub-tasks in the same family, such as artifact restoration, with minimal modification.
The paper's own cost figures imply an equity consequence it states but does not develop: as generative foundation models grow, only well-resourced groups will train them, so democratization depends on open pretrained weights and efficiency research.
The emphasis on an 'AI virtual cell' suggests a concrete experiment the field could run: use a generative model to simulate the morphological effect of a genetic perturbation, then check the prediction against real spatial transcriptomics data; the paper stops at recommending the direction.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Good broad survey; the taxonomy has a real internal inconsistency that needs fixing before the 'comprehensive' claim is believable.

The paper does what a good survey should: it collects over 150 papers on generative modeling in computational pathology, arranges them by generation target (image, text, molecular-morphology, other), gives a decent historical arc from GAN/VAE to diffusion to VLMs, and includes a practical dataset table. I also appreciate the extended discussion of evaluation gaps and clinical deployment barriers; that section is honest and useful. For a newcomer, this is a reasonable map of the field.

The soft spot is the taxonomy. The authors explicitly define generative capacity as the presence of a decoder that synthesizes new images or text, and explicitly exclude contrastive models like CLIP and DINOv2. Then in Table V, under 'Latent Representation Generation,' they list PLIP (a contrastive image-text model), Prov-GigaPath (a ViT encoder), and GPFM (a distilled feature backbone). None of these has a decoder that synthesizes content. That is not a minor edge case; it is a direct violation of the stated inclusion criterion. Table III also has an obvious misassignment: Redekop et al., a prototype-guided diffusion model for image synthesis, appears under Report Generation in the text generation table. These errors undermine the taxonomy, which is one of the paper's main selling points.

Also, the 'comprehensive' claim depends on a search strategy that lives in missing supplementary material, so I cannot verify coverage. Several reference entries have incomplete author or venue data, which matters for a reference work. The discussion of 'no standardized benchmarks' is accurate and well-stated.

Overall, the paper is useful and the core content is solid. But the scope definition and the tables disagree in places, and the authors need to either fix the tables or soften the scope claim. I would send it to peer review with a request for a careful pass over the taxonomy and reference list.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents a survey of content generation models in computational pathology, claiming to be the first comprehensive review of the field. It organizes more than 150 publications into a taxonomy with four major domains: image generation, text generation, molecular profile–morphology generation, and other specialized generation tasks. The paper reviews underlying model families (VAEs, GANs, diffusion models, generative vision-language models), compiles commonly used datasets, and discusses capabilities, challenges, and future directions such as generative foundation models, agent-driven pathology, and the AI virtual cell. The central contribution is the proposed taxonomy and the synthetic organization of a rapidly growing literature.

Significance. If the taxonomy is internally consistent and the coverage is genuinely comprehensive, this survey would be a valuable reference for researchers entering the field. The paper is timely, covers a broad and rapidly expanding literature, and provides a balanced discussion of technical limitations, evaluation gaps, and clinical translation barriers. It is transparent about the absence of standardized benchmarks, which is an important and honest observation. The most valuable strengths are the breadth of the compiled literature, the structured tables organizing methods by task and architecture, and the practical compilation of datasets. However, the value of the survey hinges on the reliability of its taxonomy, and the internal inconsistencies detailed below currently weaken that contribution.

major comments (2)

[Section I vs. Section III-D.3 / Table V] The paper explicitly defines its scope in Section I to include only models with generative capacity, i.e., those with a decoder that can synthesize new images or text, and it explicitly excludes encoder-only or contrastive foundation models such as CLIP, ALIGN, and DINOv2. Yet Section III-D.3 and Table V classify PLIP [177], Prov-GigaPath [181], and GPFM [182] under 'Latent Representation Generation' as if they were generative models. These are respectively a contrastive image-text model, a ViT encoder for slide-level features, and a knowledge-distilled feature backbone; none of them contains a decoder that synthesizes new images or text. The text in Section III-D.3 even presents these as examples of 'latent representation generation,' conflating feature extraction with content generation. This directly contradicts the paper's own stated inclusion criterion and undermines the internal coherence of the taxonomy, which is one of the principal claimed contributions. Please either remove these and similar encoder-only entries (e.g., Hu et al. [44], PRDL [178]) from the generative taxonomy, or substantially broaden the scope definition to explicitly cover representation generation, and then revise the Introduction and the category description to match.
[Table III, Report Generation] The entry 'Redekop et al. [83] Prototype Diffusion Synthesizing images guided by unsupervised prototypes for data-efficient SSL' is listed under Report Generation, but it is a conditional diffusion model for image synthesis, not a report generation method. This method is not discussed in the text of Section III-B.3, and its placement contradicts the task definition. This categorical misassignment indicates that the table curation needs a systematic pass against the textual descriptions and task definitions, since a similar error could affect other entries.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract / Section I (Contributions)] The abstract describes 'over 150 representative studies' while the contribution list claims 'covering more than 150 publications up to July 2025,' and the Introduction calls the review 'comprehensive.' Please clarify whether the selection is exhaustive or representative, and define the inclusion criteria in the main text rather than only in supplementary material.
[Section I / Section IV] The search strategy and the evaluation metrics are referenced as 'Supplementary Materials Section II' and 'Supplementary Materials Table I,' but the preprint as provided does not include the supplementary file. To support the comprehensiveness claim, please make the search strategy and the metrics table available, or summarize them in the main text.
[References] Several references lack complete bibliographic information; for example, [48] ('Diffusion-based generation of histopathological whole slide images at a gigapixel scale') and [78] ('Insmix') have no venue or arXiv identifier, and [115] ('Pathldm') has no venue. Please complete these entries for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the survey's taxonomic and bibliographic claims rest on external literature, not on a derivation from its own outputs.

full rationale

This paper is a literature survey whose contributions are (1) a claim of comprehensiveness covering over 150 publications up to July 2025, (2) a proposed taxonomy of content generation tasks, and (3) a curated dataset and evaluation summary. It contains no fitted parameters, no predictive model, no equations, and no derivation chain from inputs to outputs. There is therefore no step in which a prediction reduces by construction to a fitted input, no self-definitional equivalence between a claimed result and its definition, and no load-bearing appeal to the authors' own prior results. The skeptical observation that Table V classifies encoder-only models such as PLIP, Prov-GigaPath, and GPFM under 'Latent Representation Generation' despite the paper's stated scope exclusion of encoder-only models is a genuine internal inconsistency in the taxonomy, but it is a correctness or consistency issue, not circular reasoning: the classification does not make the survey's central claim equivalent to its own input. Similarly, placing Redekop et al. (a prototype-guided diffusion image synthesis method) under 'Report Generation' in Table III is a categorical misassignment, again not a circularity. The paper's claim of comprehensiveness depends on a search strategy deferred to Supplementary Materials Section II, which is absent from this preprint; that absence weakens the evidential support for 'comprehensive' but does not constitute circularity, since completeness is an external bibliographic property rather than a quantity derived from the survey itself. No self-citations are used to justify the taxonomy or the selection of papers, and no 'uniqueness theorem' or prior-work assertion is imported to forbid alternatives. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This survey introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. It relies on standard background knowledge in machine learning and computational pathology; the central claim is about literature organization, not a derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Content Generation Models in Computational Pathology: A Comprehensive Survey on Methods, Applications, and Challenges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KVL4D6MR

@misc{pith2026250510993,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Content Generation Models in Computational Pathology: A Comprehensive Survey on Methods, Applications, and Challenges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KVL4D6MR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10993}
}

read the original abstract

Content generation modeling has emerged as a promising direction in computational pathology, offering capabilities such as data-efficient learning, synthetic data augmentation, and task-oriented generation across diverse diagnostic tasks. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of recent progress in the field, organized into four key domains: image generation, text generation, molecular profile-morphology generation, and other specialized generation applications. By analyzing over 150 representative studies, we trace the evolution of content generation architectures -- from early generative adversarial networks to recent advances in diffusion models and generative vision-language models. We further examine the datasets and evaluation protocols commonly used in this domain and highlight ongoing limitations, including challenges in generating high-fidelity whole slide images, clinical interpretability, and concerns related to the ethical and legal implications of synthetic data. The review concludes with a discussion of open challenges and prospective research directions, with an emphasis on developing integrated and clinically deployable generation systems. This work aims to provide a foundational reference for researchers and practitioners developing content generation models in computational pathology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.10993 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Diverse generation targets in computational pathology. This figure illustrates the spectrum of generative tasks, covering image and mask synthesis, spatial layout generation, textual report generation, and visual question answering. Computational pathology has rapidly evolved into a data-intensive field driven by advances in deep learning and whole slide imaging [5]. However, this progress also reveals core limitati… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Number of published papers on generative models in pathology from 2017 to July 2025. The red label “2025.7* (ongoing)” marks ongoing work up to July, while the purple curve shows the exponential growth trend. The accompanying word cloud highlights the most frequent terms, extracted from the titles of the collected articles. where generative tasks are listed as one among many applications, whereas Bilal et al. (2025… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Taxonomy of content generation models in computational pathology. • We propose a unified taxonomy that organizes existing studies by generation targets and modeling approaches, offering a structured view of methodological advances in pathology. • We curate commonly used datasets across major generation tasks and critically discuss open challenges and future directions. The remainder of this survey is organized as fo… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Timeline of key developments in pathological generation (2017-2025). This timeline illustrates the major milestones and developmental trajectory of generative models across methods in pathology. following sections, we describe these model families, focusing on their al…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Schematics of representative generative model architectures. (a) VAE learns a probabilistic latent space and reconstructs images through encoder-decoder optimization. (b) GAN consists of a generator and a discriminator trained in a minimax game to produce realistic out…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Applications of image generation in computational pathology. Illustrative examples of key tasks, including mask-guided synthesis, resolution enhancement, text-to-image translation, and stain transfer. approaches differ in the source and granularity of their conditional…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Applications of text generation in computational pathology. Examples of primary text generation tasks include patch-level captioning, WSI-to-report generation, and text synthesis from image-text pairs. inherent in pathology slides, while frameworks like WSI-VQA [159] …

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Examples from representative pathology datasets showcasing variations in tissue type, staining, annotations, captions, and VQA pairs. TABLE VI DATASETS FOR CONTENT GENERATION MODELS IN COMPUTATIONAL PATHOLOGY, ORGANIZED BY TASK AND DATA TYPE. PAIRS INDICATE IMAGE–TEXT …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

235 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

[177]

A visual–language foundation model for pathology image analysis using medical twitter,

Z. Huanget al., “A visual–language foundation model for pathology image analysis using medical twitter,”Nat. Med., vol. 29, pp. 2307– 2316, 2023

work page 2023
[181]

A whole-slide foundation model for digital pathology from real-world data,

H. Xuet al., “A whole-slide foundation model for digital pathology from real-world data,”Nature, vol. 630, pp. 181–188, 2024

work page 2024
[182]

Towards a generalizable pathology foundation model via unified knowledge distillation,

J. Maet al., “Towards a generalizable pathology foundation model via unified knowledge distillation,” 2025

work page 2025
[44]

Unsupervised learning for cell-level visual representation in histopathology images with generative adversarial networks,

B. Huet al., “Unsupervised learning for cell-level visual representation in histopathology images with generative adversarial networks,”IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1316–1328, Jul. 2019

2019
[178]

Promptable representation distribution learning and data augmentation for gigapixel histopathology wsi analysis,

K. Tanget al., “Promptable representation distribution learning and data augmentation for gigapixel histopathology wsi analysis,”Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., vol. 39, pp. 7247–7256, 2025

work page 2025
[83]

Prototype-guided diffusion for digital pathology: Achieving foundation model performance with minimal clinical data,

E. Redekopet al., “Prototype-guided diffusion for digital pathology: Achieving foundation model performance with minimal clinical data,” inProc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog. Workshops, June 2025, pp. 5187–5195

2025
[1]

Synthetic data in biomedicine via generative artificial intelligence,

B. van Breugelet al., “Synthetic data in biomedicine via generative artificial intelligence,”Nat. Rev. Bioeng., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 991–1004, Oct. 2024

2024
[2]

Shifting machine learning for healthcare from development to deployment and from models to data,

A. Zhanget al., “Shifting machine learning for healthcare from development to deployment and from models to data,”Nat. Biomed. Eng., vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1330–1345, Dec. 2022

2022

Show all 235 references

[3]

Diffusion models in medical imaging: A compre- hensive survey,

A. Kazerouniet al., “Diffusion models in medical imaging: A compre- hensive survey,”Med. Image Anal., vol. 88, Aug. 2023

2023
[4]

Generative ai for computational pathology,

S. P. Deshpande, “Generative ai for computational pathology,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Warwick, Coventry, U.K., Aug. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/185054/

2023
[5]

Artificial intelligence for digital and computational pathology,

A. H. Songet al., “Artificial intelligence for digital and computational pathology,”Nat. Rev. Bioeng., vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 930–949, Dec. 2023

2023
[6]

Diffusion models in vision: A survey,

F.-A. Croitoruet al., “Diffusion models in vision: A survey,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 10 850–10 869, Sept. 2023

2023
[7]

Pix2path: Integrating spatial transcriptomics and digital pathology with deep learning to score pathological risk and link gene expression to disease mechanisms,

X. Fu and Y . Chen, “Pix2path: Integrating spatial transcriptomics and digital pathology with deep learning to score pathological risk and link gene expression to disease mechanisms,”bioRxiv, 2024

2024
[8]

Generative adversarial networks accurately recon- struct pan-cancer histology from pathologic, genomic, and radiographic latent features,

F. M. Howardet al., “Generative adversarial networks accurately recon- struct pan-cancer histology from pathologic, genomic, and radiographic latent features,”Sci. Adv., vol. 10, p. eadq0856, 2024, *Corresponding authors

2024
[9]

Artifact detection and restoration in histology images with stain-style and structural preservation,

J. Keet al., “Artifact detection and restoration in histology images with stain-style and structural preservation,”IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 3487–3500, 2023

2023
[10]

ODA-GAN: Orthogonal decoupling alignment GAN assisted by weakly-supervised learning for virtual immunohistochem- istry staining,

T. Wanget al., “ODA-GAN: Orthogonal decoupling alignment GAN assisted by weakly-supervised learning for virtual immunohistochem- istry staining,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., June 2025, pp. 25 920–25 929

2025
[11]

Cross-modal diffusion modelling for super-resolved spatial transcriptomics,

X. Wanget al., “Cross-modal diffusion modelling for super-resolved spatial transcriptomics,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv.Springer, 2024, pp. 98–108

2024
[12]

GenST: A generative cross-modal model for predicting spatial transcriptomics from histology images,

R. Woodet al., “GenST: A generative cross-modal model for predicting spatial transcriptomics from histology images,” inMICCAI Workshop on Computational Pathology with Multimodal Data (COMPAYL), 2025

2025
[13]

Integrating spatial and single-cell transcriptomics data using deep generative models with spatialscope,

X. Wanet al., “Integrating spatial and single-cell transcriptomics data using deep generative models with spatialscope,”Nat. Commun., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 7848, November 2023

2023
[14]

Self-supervised representation learning using visual field expansion on digital pathology,

J. Boydet al., “Self-supervised representation learning using visual field expansion on digital pathology,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., Oct. 2021, pp. 639–647

2021
[15]

Diffinfinite: Large mask-image synthesis via parallel random patch diffusion in histopathology,

M. Aversaet al., “Diffinfinite: Large mask-image synthesis via parallel random patch diffusion in histopathology,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 2023, pp. 78 126–78 141

2023
[16]

Artifact restoration in histology images with diffusion probabilistic models,

Z. Heet al., “Artifact restoration in histology images with diffusion probabilistic models,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2023, pp. 518–527

2023
[17]

StainDiff: Transfer stain styles of histology images with denoising diffusion probabilistic models and self-ensemble,

Y . Shen and J. Ke, “StainDiff: Transfer stain styles of histology images with denoising diffusion probabilistic models and self-ensemble,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2023, pp. 549–559

2023
[18]

A multimodal generative ai copilot for human pathology,

M. Y . Luet al., “A multimodal generative ai copilot for human pathology,”Nature, vol. 634, pp. 466–473, 2024

2024
[19]

SlideChat: A large vision-language assistant for whole-slide pathology image understanding,

Y . Chenet al., “SlideChat: A large vision-language assistant for whole-slide pathology image understanding,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., June 2025, pp. 5134–5143. AUTHORet al.: PREPARATION OF BRIEF PAPERS FOR IEEE TRANSACTIONS AND JOURNALS (FEBRUARY 2017) 17

2025
[20]

Quilt-LLaV A: Visual instruction tuning by ex- tracting localized narratives from open-source histopathology videos,

M. S. Seyfiogluet al., “Quilt-LLaV A: Visual instruction tuning by ex- tracting localized narratives from open-source histopathology videos,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., 2024, pp. 13 183–13 192

2024
[21]

Diffusion models in low-level vision: A survey,

C. Heet al., “Diffusion models in low-level vision: A survey,”IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 2025, to be published

2025
[22]

Diffusion models in bioinformatics and computational biology,

Z. Guoet al., “Diffusion models in bioinformatics and computational biology,”Nat. Rev. Bioeng., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 136–154, Feb. 2024

2024
[23]

A new era in computational pathology: A survey on foundation and vision-language models,

D. Chandaet al., “A new era in computational pathology: A survey on foundation and vision-language models,”arXiv:2408.14496, Aug. 2024

2024 arXiv
[24]

Foundation models in computational pathology: A review of challenges, opportunities, and impact,

M. Bilalet al., “Foundation models in computational pathology: A review of challenges, opportunities, and impact,”arXiv:2502.08333, Feb. 2025

2025 arXiv
[25]

Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,

A. Radfordet al., “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,” inProc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2021, pp. 8748–8763

2021
[26]

Scaling up visual and vision-language representation learning with noisy text supervision,

C. Jiaet al., “Scaling up visual and vision-language representation learning with noisy text supervision,” inInt. Conf. Mach. Learn. PMLR, 2021, pp. 4904–4916

2021
[27]

Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision,

M. Oquabet al., “Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision,”arXiv:2304.07193, 2023

2023 arXiv
[28]

An introduction to variational autoen- coders,

D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “An introduction to variational autoen- coders,”Found. Trends Mach. Learn., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 307–392, Dec. 2019

2019
[29]

Robust multimodal survival prediction with conditional latent differentiation variational autoencoder,

J. Zhouet al., “Robust multimodal survival prediction with conditional latent differentiation variational autoencoder,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2025, pp. 10 384–10 393

2025
[30]

Self-supervised representation distribution learning for reliable data augmentation in histopathology WSI classification,

K. Tanget al., “Self-supervised representation distribution learning for reliable data augmentation in histopathology WSI classification,”IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 462–474, Feb. 2025

2025
[31]

Generative adversarial nets,

I. J. Goodfellowet al., “Generative adversarial nets,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Montreal, QC, Canada, 2014, pp. 2672– 2680

2014
[32]

Conditional generative adversarial nets,

M. Mirza and S. Osindero, “Conditional generative adversarial nets,” arXiv:1411.1784, Nov. 2014

2014 arXiv
[33]

Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks,

P. Isolaet al., “Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., Honolulu, HI, USA, Jul. 2017, pp. 1125–1134

2017
[34]

Tackling stain variability using CycleGAN-based stain augmentation,

N. Bouteldjaet al., “Tackling stain variability using CycleGAN-based stain augmentation,”J. Pathol. Inform., vol. 13, Dec. 2022

2022
[35]

Stain normalization of histopathology images using generative adversarial networks,

F. G. Zanjaniet al., “Stain normalization of histopathology images using generative adversarial networks,” inProc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag., Washington, DC, USA, Apr. 2018, pp. 573–577

2018
[36]

Generative adversarial networks for stain normalisation in histopathology,

J. Breenet al., “Generative adversarial networks for stain normalisation in histopathology,” inApplications of Generative AI, A. Khannaet al., Eds. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2024, ch. 10, pp. 227–247

2024
[37]

Virtual multi-staining in a single-section view for renal pathology using generative adversarial networks,

M. Kawaiet al., “Virtual multi-staining in a single-section view for renal pathology using generative adversarial networks,”Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 182, Aug. 2024

2024
[38]

Unpaired stain transfer using pathology-consistent constrained generative adversarial networks,

S. Liuet al., “Unpaired stain transfer using pathology-consistent constrained generative adversarial networks,”IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1977–1989, Aug. 2021

1977
[39]

A federated learning system for histopathology image analysis with an orchestral stain-normalization GAN,

Y . Shenet al., “A federated learning system for histopathology image analysis with an orchestral stain-normalization GAN,”IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1969–1981, Jul. 2023

1969
[40]

A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks,

T. Karraset al., “A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., Long Beach, CA, USA, Jun. 2019, pp. 4401–4410

2019
[41]

Characterizing the features of mitotic figures using a conditional diffusion probabilistic model,

C. D. Bahadiret al., “Characterizing the features of mitotic figures using a conditional diffusion probabilistic model,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., Vancouver, Canada, Oct. 2023, pp. 121–131

2023
[42]

ProGleason-GAN: Conditional progressive growing GAN for prostatic cancer Gleason grade patch synthesis,

A. Golfeet al., “ProGleason-GAN: Conditional progressive growing GAN for prostatic cancer Gleason grade patch synthesis,”Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 240, Aug. 2023

2023
[43]

Co-synthesis of histopathology nuclei image-label pairs using a context-conditioned joint diffusion model,

S. Minet al., “Co-synthesis of histopathology nuclei image-label pairs using a context-conditioned joint diffusion model,” inProc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis., Milan, Italy, Sept./Oct. 2024, pp. 146–162

2024
[45]

Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

J. Hoet al., “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Dec. 2020, pp. 6840–6851

2020
[46]

Denoising diffusion implicit models,

J. Songet al., “Denoising diffusion implicit models,” inProc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., May 2021

2021
[47]

Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations,

Y . Songet al., “Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations,” inProc. Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., May 2021

2021
[48]

Diffusion-based generation of histopathological whole slide images at a gigapixel scale,

R. Harbet al., “Diffusion-based generation of histopathological whole slide images at a gigapixel scale,” 2023

2023
[49]

Diffmix: Diffusion model-based data synthesis for nuclei segmentation and classification in imbalanced pathology image datasets,

H.-J. Oh and W.-K. Jeong, “Diffmix: Diffusion model-based data synthesis for nuclei segmentation and classification in imbalanced pathology image datasets,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2023, pp. 337–345

2023
[50]

Histo-diffusion: A diffusion super-resolution method for digital pathology with comprehensive quality assessment,

X. Xuet al., “Histo-diffusion: A diffusion super-resolution method for digital pathology with comprehensive quality assessment,” arXiv:2408.15218, 2024

2024 arXiv
[51]

Histology image artifact restoration with lightweight transformer based diffusion model,

C. Wanget al., “Histology image artifact restoration with lightweight transformer based diffusion model,” inArtif. Intell. Med., 2024, pp. 81–89

2024
[52]

Disc: Latent diffusion models with self-distillation from separated conditions for prostate cancer grading,

M. M. Hoet al., “Disc: Latent diffusion models with self-distillation from separated conditions for prostate cancer grading,” inProc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag., 2024, pp. 1–5

2024
[53]

NASDM: Nuclei-aware semantic histopathology image generation using diffusion models,

A. Shrivastava and P. T. Fletcher, “NASDM: Nuclei-aware semantic histopathology image generation using diffusion models,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., Vancouver, Canada, Oct. 2023, pp. 585–594

2023
[54]

Generation of synthetic whole-slide image tiles of tumours from rna-sequencing data via cascaded diffusion models,

F. Carrillo-Perezet al., “Generation of synthetic whole-slide image tiles of tumours from rna-sequencing data via cascaded diffusion models,” Nat. Biomed. Eng., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 320–332, March 2025

2025
[55]

Classifier-free diffusion guidance,

J. Ho and T. Salimans, “Classifier-free diffusion guidance,” arXiv:2207.12598, 2022

2022 arXiv
[56]

High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffu- sion models,

R. Rombachet al., “High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffu- sion models,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., 2022, pp. 10 684–10 695

2022
[57]

Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models,

L. Zhanget al., “Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., 2023, pp. 3836– 3847

2023
[58]

Counterfactual diffusion models for mechanistic explainability of artificial intelligence models in pathology,

L. ˇZigutyt˙eet al., “Counterfactual diffusion models for mechanistic explainability of artificial intelligence models in pathology,”bioRxiv, 2025

2025
[59]

An introduction to vision-language modeling,

F. Bordeset al., “An introduction to vision-language modeling,” arXiv:2405.17247, 2024

2024 arXiv
[60]

Learning visual grounding from generative vision and language model,

S. Wanget al., “Learning visual grounding from generative vision and language model,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Winter Conf. Appl. Comput. Vis. IEEE, 2025, pp. 8057–8067

2025
[61]

Cplip: Zero-shot learning for histopathology with comprehensive vision-language alignment,

S. Javedet al., “Cplip: Zero-shot learning for histopathology with comprehensive vision-language alignment,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., 2024, pp. 11 450–11 459

2024
[62]

Pathalign: A vision-language model for whole slide images in histopathology,

F. Ahmedet al., “Pathalign: A vision-language model for whole slide images in histopathology,” inMICCAI Workshop on Computational Pathology with Multimodal Data (COMPAYL), 2024

2024
[63]

Visual instruction tuning,

H. Liuet al., “Visual instruction tuning,”Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 36, pp. 34 892–34 916, 2023

2023
[64]

Vision-language transformer for interpretable pathol- ogy visual question answering,

U. Naseemet al., “Vision-language transformer for interpretable pathol- ogy visual question answering,”IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 27, pp. 1681–1690, 2023

2023
[65]

Towards generalist biomedical ai,

T. Tuet al., “Towards generalist biomedical ai,”NEJM AI, vol. 1, p. AIoa2300138, 2024

2024
[66]

LLaV A-med: Training a large language-and-vision assis- tant for biomedicine in one day,

C. Liet al., “LLaV A-med: Training a large language-and-vision assis- tant for biomedicine in one day,” inProc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., New Orleans, LA, USA, Dec. 2023, pp. 28 541–28 564

2023
[67]

Generating dermatopathology reports from gigapixel whole slide images with HistoGPT,

M. Tranet al., “Generating dermatopathology reports from gigapixel whole slide images with HistoGPT,”Nat. Commun., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 4886, 2025

2025
[68]

Pathologyvlm: a large vision-language model for pathology image understanding,

D. Daiet al., “Pathologyvlm: a large vision-language model for pathology image understanding,”Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 58, p. 186, 2025

2025
[69]

Topofm: Topology-guided pathology foundation model for high-resolution pathology image synthesis with cellular-level control,

J. Liet al., “Topofm: Topology-guided pathology foundation model for high-resolution pathology image synthesis with cellular-level control,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 2025

2025
[70]

A multimodal knowledge-enhanced whole-slide pathology foundation model,

Y . Xuet al., “A multimodal knowledge-enhanced whole-slide pathology foundation model,” 2025

2025
[71]

Pathoduet: Foundation models for pathological slide analysis of h&e and ihc stains,

S. Huaet al., “Pathoduet: Foundation models for pathological slide analysis of h&e and ihc stains,”Med. Image Anal., vol. 97, p. 103289, 2024

2024
[72]

Star-rl: Spatial-temporal hierarchical reinforcement learning for interpretable pathology image super-resolution,

W. Chenet al., “Star-rl: Spatial-temporal hierarchical reinforcement learning for interpretable pathology image super-resolution,”IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 2024

2024
[73]

Evidence-based diagnostic reasoning with multi-agent copilot for human pathology,

C. Chenet al., “Evidence-based diagnostic reasoning with multi-agent copilot for human pathology,”arXiv:2506.20964, 2025. 18 GENERIC COLORIZED JOURNALIEEE REVIEWS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL. XX, NO. XX, XXXX 2025

2025
[74]

Pathfinder: A multi-modal multi-agent system for medical diagnostic decision-making applied to histopathology,

F. Ghezlooet al., “Pathfinder: A multi-modal multi-agent system for medical diagnostic decision-making applied to histopathology,” arXiv:2502.08916, 2025

2025 arXiv
[75]

Selective synthetic augmentation with histogan for im- proved histopathology image classification,

Y . Xueet al., “Selective synthetic augmentation with histogan for im- proved histopathology image classification,”Med. Image Anal., vol. 67, p. 101816, 2021

2021
[76]

Unified framework for histopathology image augmenta- tion and classification via generative models,

M. Liet al., “Unified framework for histopathology image augmenta- tion and classification via generative models,” inProc. Int. Conf. Digit. Image Comput., Tech. Appl., 2024, pp. 462–469

2024
[77]

Mitigating bias in prostate cancer diagnosis using synthetic data for improved ai driven gleason grading,

D. J. Van Boovenet al., “Mitigating bias in prostate cancer diagnosis using synthetic data for improved ai driven gleason grading,”NPJ Precis. Oncol., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 151, 2025

2025
[78]

Insmix: Towards realistic generative data augmentation for nuclei instance segmentation,

Y . Linet al., “Insmix: Towards realistic generative data augmentation for nuclei instance segmentation,” 2022

2022
[79]

Vit-dae: Transformer-driven diffusion autoencoder for histopathology image analysis,

X. Xuet al., “Vit-dae: Transformer-driven diffusion autoencoder for histopathology image analysis,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2023, pp. 66–76

2023
[80]

Diffusion-based data augmentation for nuclei image segmentation,

X. Yuet al., “Diffusion-based data augmentation for nuclei image segmentation,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv.Springer, 2023, pp. 592–602

2023
[81]

Usegmix: Unsupervised segment mix for efficient data augmentation in pathology images,

J. Wang and J. Kwak, “Usegmix: Unsupervised segment mix for efficient data augmentation in pathology images,” inMICCAI Workshop on Data Engineering in Medical Imaging, 2024, pp. 54–63

2024
[82]

Learned representation-guided diffusion models for large-image generation,

A. Graikoset al., “Learned representation-guided diffusion models for large-image generation,” pp. 8532–8542, 2024

2024
[84]

Generating progressive images from pathological tran- sitions via diffusion model,

Z. Liuet al., “Generating progressive images from pathological tran- sitions via diffusion model,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2024, pp. 308–318

2024
[85]

Optimising diffusion models for histopathology image synthesis,

V . Porteret al., “Optimising diffusion models for histopathology image synthesis,” inProc. Brit. Mach. Vis. Conf., 2024

2024
[86]

Pdseg: Patch-wise distillation and controllable image generation for weakly-supervised histopathology tissue segmentation,

W.-H. Liet al., “Pdseg: Patch-wise distillation and controllable image generation for weakly-supervised histopathology tissue segmentation,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech Signal Process., 2025, pp. 1–5

2025
[87]

Enhancing gland segmentation in colon histology images using an instance-aware diffusion model,

M. Sunet al., “Enhancing gland segmentation in colon histology images using an instance-aware diffusion model,”Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 166, p. 107527, 2023

2023
[88]

Diffusion models for out-of-distribution detection in digital pathology,

J. Linmanset al., “Diffusion models for out-of-distribution detection in digital pathology,”Med. Image Anal., vol. 93, p. 103088, 2024

2024
[89]

Pathologygan: Learning deep representations of cancer tissue,

A. C. Quiroset al., “Pathologygan: Learning deep representations of cancer tissue,”arXiv:1907.02644, 2019

1907 arXiv
[90]

Multi-scale self-attention generative adversarial net- work for pathology image restoration,

M. Lianget al., “Multi-scale self-attention generative adversarial net- work for pathology image restoration,”Vis. Comput., vol. 39, pp. 4305– 4321, 2023

2023
[91]

A morphology focused diffusion probabilistic model for synthesis of histopathology images,

P. A. Moghadamet al., “A morphology focused diffusion probabilistic model for synthesis of histopathology images,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Winter Conf. Appl. Comput. Vis., 2023, pp. 2000–2009

2023
[92]

Deep learning for automated detection of breast cancer in deep ultraviolet fluorescence images with diffusion probabilistic model,

S. S. Ghahfarokhiet al., “Deep learning for automated detection of breast cancer in deep ultraviolet fluorescence images with diffusion probabilistic model,” inProc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag., 2024, pp. 1–5

2024
[93]

Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under distribution shifts,

I. Ktenaet al., “Generative models improve fairness of medical classifiers under distribution shifts,”Nat. Med., vol. 30, pp. 1166–1173, 2024

2024
[94]

Generating and evaluating synthetic data in digital pathology through diffusion models,

M. Pozziet al., “Generating and evaluating synthetic data in digital pathology through diffusion models,”Sci. Rep., vol. 14, p. 28435, 2024

2024
[95]

A multi-attribute controllable generative model for histopathology image synthesis,

J. Yeet al., “A multi-attribute controllable generative model for histopathology image synthesis,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2021, pp. 613–623

2021
[96]

Sharp-gan: Sharpness loss regularized gan for histopathology image synthesis,

S. Butteet al., “Sharp-gan: Sharpness loss regularized gan for histopathology image synthesis,” inProc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag., 2022, pp. 1–5

2022
[97]

Realistic data enrichment for robust image segmentation in histopathology,

S. Cechnickaet al., “Realistic data enrichment for robust image segmentation in histopathology,” inMICCAI Workshop on Domain Adaptation and Representation Transfer, 2023, pp. 63–72

2023
[98]

Style-extracting diffusion models for semi-supervised histopathology segmentation,

M. ¨Ottlet al., “Style-extracting diffusion models for semi-supervised histopathology segmentation,” inProc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis., 2024, pp. 236–252

2024
[99]

Synclay: Interactive synthesis of histology images from bespoke cellular layouts,

S. Deshpandeet al., “Synclay: Interactive synthesis of histology images from bespoke cellular layouts,”Med. Image Anal., vol. 91, p. 102995, 2024

2024
[100]

Hadiff: hierarchy aggregated diffusion model for pathology image segmentation,

X. Zhanget al., “Hadiff: hierarchy aggregated diffusion model for pathology image segmentation,”Vis. Comput., pp. 1–12, 2025

2025
[101]

Mask-guided cross-image attention for zero-shot in- silico histopathologic image generation with a diffusion model,

D. Winteret al., “Mask-guided cross-image attention for zero-shot in- silico histopathologic image generation with a diffusion model,” 2025

2025
[102]

A robust image segmentation and synthesis pipeline for histopathology,

M. Jehanzaibet al., “A robust image segmentation and synthesis pipeline for histopathology,”Med. Image Anal., vol. 99, p. 103344, 2025

2025
[103]

Pathopainter: Augmenting histopathology segmentation via tumor-aware inpainting,

H. Liuet al., “Pathopainter: Augmenting histopathology segmentation via tumor-aware inpainting,”arXiv:2503.04634, 2025

2025 arXiv
[104]

Restoration of marker occluded hematoxylin and eosin stained whole slide histology images using generative adversarial networks,

B. Venkateshet al., “Restoration of marker occluded hematoxylin and eosin stained whole slide histology images using generative adversarial networks,” inProc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag., 2020, pp. 591–595

2020
[105]

Enhanced pathology image quality with re- store–generative adversarial network,

R. Ronget al., “Enhanced pathology image quality with re- store–generative adversarial network,”Am. J. Pathol., vol. 193, pp. 404–416, 2023

2023
[106]

HARP: Unsupervised histopathology artifact restora- tion,

M. Fuchset al., “HARP: Unsupervised histopathology artifact restora- tion,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Imag. Deep Learn.PMLR, 2024, pp. 465–479

2024
[107]

Latentartifusion: An effective and efficient histological artifacts restoration framework,

Z. Heet al., “Latentartifusion: An effective and efficient histological artifacts restoration framework,” inMICCAI Workshop on Deep Gen- erative Models, 2024, pp. 202–211

2024
[108]

Artidiffuser: A unified framework for artifact restora- tion and synthesis for histology images via counterfactual diffusion model,

C. Wanget al., “Artidiffuser: A unified framework for artifact restora- tion and synthesis for histology images via counterfactual diffusion model,”Med. Image Anal., vol. 102, p. 103567, 2025

2025
[109]

Synthesis of diagnostic quality cancer pathology images by generative adversarial networks,

A. B. Levineet al., “Synthesis of diagnostic quality cancer pathology images by generative adversarial networks,”J. Pathol., vol. 252, pp. 178–188, 2020

2020
[110]

Seamless virtual whole slide image synthesis and validation using perceptual embedding consistency,

A. Lahianiet al., “Seamless virtual whole slide image synthesis and validation using perceptual embedding consistency,”IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 25, pp. 403–411, 2021

2021
[111]

SAFRON: stitching across the frontier network for generating colorectal cancer histology images,

S. Deshpandeet al., “SAFRON: stitching across the frontier network for generating colorectal cancer histology images,”Med. Image Anal., vol. 77, p. 102337, 2022

2022
[112]

Pathup: Patch-wise timestep tracking for multi-class large pathology image synthesising diffusion model,

J. Liet al., “Pathup: Patch-wise timestep tracking for multi-class large pathology image synthesising diffusion model,” inProc. ACM Int. Conf. Multimed., 2024, pp. 3984–3993

2024
[113]

Urcdm: Ultra-resolution image synthesis in histopathology,

S. Cechnickaet al., “Urcdm: Ultra-resolution image synthesis in histopathology,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2024, pp. 535–545

2024
[114]

Comparative analysis of diffusion generative models in computational pathology,

D. Thakkaret al., “Comparative analysis of diffusion generative models in computational pathology,”arXiv:2411.15719, 2024

2024 arXiv
[115]

Pathldm: Text conditioned latent diffusion model for histopathology,

S. Yellapragadaet al., “Pathldm: Text conditioned latent diffusion model for histopathology,” 2023

2023
[116]

Vims: virtual immunohistochemistry multiplex stain- ing via text-to-stain diffusion trained on uniplex stains,

S. Dubeyet al., “Vims: virtual immunohistochemistry multiplex stain- ing via text-to-stain diffusion trained on uniplex stains,” inProc. Int. Workshop Mach. Learn. Med. Imag., 2024, pp. 143–155

2024
[117]

Neural stain-style transfer learning using gan for histopathological images,

H. Choet al., “Neural stain-style transfer learning using gan for histopathological images,” 2017

2017
[118]

Residual cyclegan for robust domain transformation of histopathological tissue slides,

T. de Belet al., “Residual cyclegan for robust domain transformation of histopathological tissue slides,”Med. Image Anal., vol. 70, p. 102004, 2021

2021
[119]

Normalization of he-stained histological images using cycle consistent generative adversarial networks,

M. Runzet al., “Normalization of he-stained histological images using cycle consistent generative adversarial networks,”Diagn. Pathol., vol. 16, p. 71, 2021

2021
[120]

Colour adaptive generative networks for stain nor- malisation of histopathology images,

C. Conget al., “Colour adaptive generative networks for stain nor- malisation of histopathology images,”Med. Image Anal., vol. 82, p. 102580, 2022

2022
[121]

Stain normalization using score-based diffusion model through stain separation and overlapped moving window patch strate- gies,

J. Jeonget al., “Stain normalization using score-based diffusion model through stain separation and overlapped moving window patch strate- gies,”Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 152, p. 106335, 2023

2023
[122]

Av-gan: Attention-based varifocal generative adversarial network for uneven medical image translation,

Z. Liet al., “Av-gan: Attention-based varifocal generative adversarial network for uneven medical image translation,” 2024

2024
[123]

Stainfuser: Controlling diffusion for faster neural style transfer in multi-gigapixel histology images,

R. Jewsburyet al., “Stainfuser: Controlling diffusion for faster neural style transfer in multi-gigapixel histology images,” 2024

2024
[124]

Staindiffuser: Multitask dual diffusion model for virtual staining,

T. Katariaet al., “Staindiffuser: Multitask dual diffusion model for virtual staining,” 2024

2024
[125]

Multi-modal denoising diffusion pre-training for whole- slide image classification,

W. Louet al., “Multi-modal denoising diffusion pre-training for whole- slide image classification,” inProc. ACM Int. Conf. Multimed., 2024, p. 10804–10813

2024
[126]

Accelerating histopathology workflows with generative ai-based virtually multiplexed tumour profiling,

P. Patiet al., “Accelerating histopathology workflows with generative ai-based virtually multiplexed tumour profiling,”Nat. Mach. Intell., vol. 6, pp. 1077–1093, 2024

2024
[127]

Test-time stain adaptation with diffusion models for histopathology image classification,

C.-C. Tsaiet al., “Test-time stain adaptation with diffusion models for histopathology image classification,” inProc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis., 2025, pp. 257–275

2025
[128]

Pst-diff: achieving high-consistency stain transfer by diffusion models with pathological and structural constraints,

Y . Heet al., “Pst-diff: achieving high-consistency stain transfer by diffusion models with pathological and structural constraints,”IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 2024. AUTHORet al.: PREPARATION OF BRIEF PAPERS FOR IEEE TRANSACTIONS AND JOURNALS (FEBRUARY 2017) 19

2024
[129]

F2fldm: Latent diffusion models with histopathology pre-trained embeddings for unpaired frozen section to ffpe translation,

M. M. Hoet al., “F2fldm: Latent diffusion models with histopathology pre-trained embeddings for unpaired frozen section to ffpe translation,” 2024

2024
[130]

Unsupervised latent stain adaptation for computational pathology,

D. Reisenb ¨uchleret al., “Unsupervised latent stain adaptation for computational pathology,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2024, pp. 755–765

2024
[131]

Diffusion models for generative histopathology,

N. Sridharet al., “Diffusion models for generative histopathology,” in Deep Generative Models, 2024, pp. 154–163

2024
[132]

Versatile stain transfer in histopathology using a unified diffusion framework,

X. Yanet al., “Versatile stain transfer in histopathology using a unified diffusion framework,”bioRxiv, 2024

2024
[133]

Unpaired multi-domain histopathology virtual staining using dual path prompted inversion,

B. Xionget al., “Unpaired multi-domain histopathology virtual staining using dual path prompted inversion,”Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., vol. 39, pp. 8780–8787, 2025

2025
[134]

Generating seamless virtual immunohistochemical whole slide images with content and color consistency,

S. Liuet al., “Generating seamless virtual immunohistochemical whole slide images with content and color consistency,” inProc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed. Imag., 2025, pp. 1–5

2025
[135]

A value mapping virtual staining framework for large- scale histological imaging,

J. Wanget al., “A value mapping virtual staining framework for large- scale histological imaging,”arXiv:2501.03592, Jan. 2025

2025 arXiv
[136]

Deeply supervised two stage generative adversarial network for stain normalization,

Z. Duet al., “Deeply supervised two stage generative adversarial network for stain normalization,”Sci. Rep., vol. 15, p. 7068, 2025

2025
[137]

Diffusion-based virtual staining from polarimetric mueller matrix imaging,

X. Zhenget al., “Diffusion-based virtual staining from polarimetric mueller matrix imaging,” 2025

2025
[138]

A review of artifacts in histopathology,

S. A. Taqiet al., “A review of artifacts in histopathology,”J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol., vol. 22, no. 2, 2018

2018
[139]

Multiple instance captioning: Learning representations from histopathology textbooks and articles,

J. Gamper and N. Rajpoot, “Multiple instance captioning: Learning representations from histopathology textbooks and articles,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., 2021, pp. 16 544–16 554

2021
[140]

What a whole slide image can tell? subtype-guided masked transformer for pathological image captioning,

W. Qinet al., “What a whole slide image can tell? subtype-guided masked transformer for pathological image captioning,” 2023

2023
[141]

Histgen: Histopathology report generation via local- global feature encoding and cross-modal context interaction,

Z. Guoet al., “Histgen: Histopathology report generation via local- global feature encoding and cross-modal context interaction,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2024, pp. 189– 199

2024
[142]

In-context learning enables multimodal large language models to classify cancer pathology images,

D. Ferberet al., “In-context learning enables multimodal large language models to classify cancer pathology images,”Nat. Commun., vol. 15, p. 10104, 2024

2024
[143]

PathCoT: Chain-of-thought prompting for zero-shot pathology visual reasoning,

J. Zhouet al., “PathCoT: Chain-of-thought prompting for zero-shot pathology visual reasoning,” 2025

2025
[144]

Cost-effective instruction learning for pathology vision and language analysis,

K. Chenet al., “Cost-effective instruction learning for pathology vision and language analysis,”Nat. Comput. Sci., vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 524–533, 2025

2025
[145]

A vision–language foundation model for precision oncology,

J. Xianget al., “A vision–language foundation model for precision oncology,”Nature, vol. 638, pp. 769–778, 2025

2025
[146]

Automatic report generation for histopathology images using pre-trained vision transformers and bert,

S. Sengupta and D. E. Brown, “Automatic report generation for histopathology images using pre-trained vision transformers and bert,” 2024

2024
[147]

WsiCaption: Multiple Instance Generation of Pathology Reports for Gigapixel Whole-Slide Images ,

P. Chenet al., “ WsiCaption: Multiple Instance Generation of Pathology Reports for Gigapixel Whole-Slide Images ,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2024

2024
[148]

Pathgen-1.6m: 1.6 million pathology image-text pairs generation through multi-agent collaboration,

Y . Sunet al., “Pathgen-1.6m: 1.6 million pathology image-text pairs generation through multi-agent collaboration,” 2024

2024
[149]

Pathinsight: Instruction tuning of multimodal datasets and models for intelligence assisted diagnosis in histopathology,

X. Wuet al., “Pathinsight: Instruction tuning of multimodal datasets and models for intelligence assisted diagnosis in histopathology,” 2024

2024
[150]

Prism: A multi-modal generative foundation model for slide-level histopathology,

G. Shaikovskiet al., “Prism: A multi-modal generative foundation model for slide-level histopathology,” 2024

2024
[151]

Polypath: Adapting a large multimodal model for multi-slide pathology report generation,

F. Ahmedet al., “Polypath: Adapting a large multimodal model for multi-slide pathology report generation,”arXiv:2502.10536, 2025

2025 arXiv
[152]

Pathology report generation and multimodal representation learning for cutaneous melanocytic lesions,

R. T. Lucassenet al., “Pathology report generation and multimodal representation learning for cutaneous melanocytic lesions,” 2025

2025
[153]

Pathology report generation from whole slide images with knowledge retrieval and multi-level regional feature selection,

D. Huet al., “Pathology report generation from whole slide images with knowledge retrieval and multi-level regional feature selection,” Comput. Methods Programs Biomed., vol. 263, p. 108677, 2025

2025
[154]

Efficient whole slide pathology vqa via token compres- sion,

W. Lyuet al., “Efficient whole slide pathology vqa via token compres- sion,” 2025

2025
[155]

Cancer type, stage and prognosis assessment from pathology reports using llms,

R. Salujaet al., “Cancer type, stage and prognosis assessment from pathology reports using llms,” 2025

2025
[156]

Inference of captions from histopatho- logical patches,

M. Tsuneki and F. Kanavati, “Inference of captions from histopatho- logical patches,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Imag. Deep Learn., 2022, pp. 1235–1250

2022
[157]

Enhanced descriptive captioning model for histopathological patches,

S. Elbedwehyet al., “Enhanced descriptive captioning model for histopathological patches,”Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 83, pp. 36 645– 36 664, 2024

2024
[158]

Pathm3: A multimodal multi-task multiple instance learning framework for whole slide image classification and caption- ing,

Q. Zhouet al., “Pathm3: A multimodal multi-task multiple instance learning framework for whole slide image classification and caption- ing,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2024, pp. 373–383

2024
[159]

Wsi-vqa: Interpreting whole slide images by generative visual question answering,

P. Chenet al., “Wsi-vqa: Interpreting whole slide images by generative visual question answering,” inProc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis., 2025, pp. 401–417

2025
[160]

Pathvqa: 30000+ questions for medical visual question answering,

X. Heet al., “Pathvqa: 30000+ questions for medical visual question answering,” 2020

2020
[161]

Using generative ai to extract structured information from free text pathology reports,

F. Shahidet al., “Using generative ai to extract structured information from free text pathology reports,”J. Med. Syst., vol. 49, p. 36, 2025

2025
[162]

Leveraging large language models for structured information extraction from pathology reports,

J. B. Balasubramanianet al., “Leveraging large language models for structured information extraction from pathology reports,” 2025

2025
[163]

Enhancing doctor-patient communication using large language models for pathology report interpretation,

X. Yanget al., “Enhancing doctor-patient communication using large language models for pathology report interpretation,”BMC Med. In- form. Decis. Mak., vol. 25, p. 36, 2025

2025
[164]

Comiter,Inference of single cell profiles from histology stains with the Single-Cell omics from Histology Analysis Framework (SCHAF)

C. Comiter,Inference of single cell profiles from histology stains with the Single-Cell omics from Histology Analysis Framework (SCHAF). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2024

2024
[165]

Past: A multimodal single-cell foundation model for histopathology and spatial transcriptomics in cancer,

C. Yanget al., “Past: A multimodal single-cell foundation model for histopathology and spatial transcriptomics in cancer,” 2025

2025
[166]

Spatia: Multimodal model for prediction and generation of spatial cell phenotypes,

Z. Konget al., “Spatia: Multimodal model for prediction and generation of spatial cell phenotypes,” 2025

2025
[167]

Diffusion generative modeling for spatially resolved gene expression inference from histology images,

S. Zhuet al., “Diffusion generative modeling for spatially resolved gene expression inference from histology images,” 2025

2025
[168]

Histopathology-based protein multiplex generation using deep learning,

S. Andaniet al., “Histopathology-based protein multiplex generation using deep learning,”Nat. Mach. Intell., 2025

2025
[169]

Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics,

P. L. St ˚ahlet al., “Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics,”Science, vol. 353, no. 6294, pp. 78–82, 2016

2016
[170]

Exploring tissue architecture using spatial transcrip- tomics,

A. Raoet al., “Exploring tissue architecture using spatial transcrip- tomics,”Nature, vol. 596, no. 7871, pp. 211–220, August 2021

2021
[171]

Spatial diffusion for cell layout generation,

C. Liet al., “Spatial diffusion for cell layout generation,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2024, pp. 481–491

2024
[172]

Topocellgen: Generating histopathology cell topology with a diffusion model,

M. Xuet al., “Topocellgen: Generating histopathology cell topology with a diffusion model,” 2025

2025
[173]

Damm-diffusion: Learning divergence-aware multi- modal diffusion model for nanoparticles distribution prediction,

J. Zhouet al., “Damm-diffusion: Learning divergence-aware multi- modal diffusion model for nanoparticles distribution prediction,” 2025

2025
[174]

Prompting vision foundation models for pathology image analysis,

C. Yinet al., “Prompting vision foundation models for pathology image analysis,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., 2024, pp. 11 292–11 301

2024
[175]

Towards a text-based quantitative and explainable histopathology image analysis,

A. T. Nguyenet al., “Towards a text-based quantitative and explainable histopathology image analysis,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2024, pp. 514–524

2024
[176]

Mllm4pue: Toward universal embeddings in digital pathology through multimodal llms,

Q. Zhouet al., “Mllm4pue: Toward universal embeddings in digital pathology through multimodal llms,” 2025

2025
[179]

Augdiff: Diffusion-based feature augmentation for multiple instance learning in whole slide image,

Z. Shaoet al., “Augdiff: Diffusion-based feature augmentation for multiple instance learning in whole slide image,”IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell., vol. 5, pp. 6617–6628, 2024

2024
[180]

Dcdiff: Dual-granularity cooperative diffusion models for pathology image analysis,

J. Fanet al., “Dcdiff: Dual-granularity cooperative diffusion models for pathology image analysis,”IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 43, pp. 4393–4403, 2024

2024
[183]

Mgpath: Vision-language model with multi- granular prompt learning for few-shot wsi classification,

A.-T. Nguyenet al., “Mgpath: Vision-language model with multi- granular prompt learning for few-shot wsi classification,” 2025

2025
[184]

Syncellfactory: Generative data augmentation for cell tracking,

M. Sturmet al., “Syncellfactory: Generative data augmentation for cell tracking,” inProc. Int. Conf. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv., 2024, pp. 304–313

2024
[185]

Improving 3d deep learning segmentation with biophysically motivated cell synthesis,

R. Bruchet al., “Improving 3d deep learning segmentation with biophysically motivated cell synthesis,” 2024

2024
[186]

Tertiary lymphoid structures generation through graph-based diffusion,

M. Madeiraet al., “Tertiary lymphoid structures generation through graph-based diffusion,” inGraphs in BioMed. Image Anal., and Over- lapped Cell on Tissue Dataset for Histopathology, 2024, pp. 37–53

2024
[187]

Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer,

B. Ehteshami Bejnordiet al., “Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer,”JAMA, vol. 318, pp. 2199–2210, 2017

2017
[188]

CoNIC Challenge: Pushing the frontiers of nu- clear detection, segmentation, classification and counting,

S. Grahamet al., “CoNIC Challenge: Pushing the frontiers of nu- clear detection, segmentation, classification and counting,”Med. Image Anal., vol. 92, p. 103047, 2024

2024
[189]

Hover-net: Simultaneous segmentation and classification of nuclei in multi-tissue histology images,

——, “Hover-net: Simultaneous segmentation and classification of nuclei in multi-tissue histology images,”Med. Image Anal., vol. 58, p. 101563, 2019. 20 GENERIC COLORIZED JOURNALIEEE REVIEWS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL. XX, NO. XX, XXXX 2025

2019
[190]

Digestpath: A benchmark dataset with challenge review for the pathological detection and segmentation of digestive-system,

Q. Daet al., “Digestpath: A benchmark dataset with challenge review for the pathological detection and segmentation of digestive-system,” Med. Image Anal., vol. 80, p. 102485, 2022

2022
[191]

Gland segmentation in colon histology images: The glas challenge contest,

K. Sirinukunwattanaet al., “Gland segmentation in colon histology images: The glas challenge contest,” 2016

2016
[192]

Lizard: A large-scale dataset for colonic nuclear instance segmentation and classification,

S. Grahamet al., “Lizard: A large-scale dataset for colonic nuclear instance segmentation and classification,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., 2021, pp. 684–693

2021
[193]

A multi-organ nucleus segmentation challenge,

N. Kumaret al., “A multi-organ nucleus segmentation challenge,”IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 39, pp. 1380–1391, 2020

2020
[194]

Pannuke: an open pan-cancer histology dataset for nuclei instance segmentation and classification,

J. Gamperet al., “Pannuke: an open pan-cancer histology dataset for nuclei instance segmentation and classification,” inProc. Eur. Congr. Digit. Pathol., 2019, pp. 11–19

2019
[195]

Predicting breast tumor proliferation from whole-slide images: The tupac16 challenge,

M. Vetaet al., “Predicting breast tumor proliferation from whole-slide images: The tupac16 challenge,”Med. Image Anal., vol. 54, pp. 111– 121, 2019

2019
[196]

Bach dataset : Grand challenge on breast cancer histology images,

A. Pol ´oniaet al., “Bach dataset : Grand challenge on breast cancer histology images,” May 2019. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3632035

2019 doi
[197]

A dataset for breast cancer histopathological image classification,

F. A. Spanholet al., “A dataset for breast cancer histopathological image classification,”IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 63, pp. 1455– 1462, 2016

2016
[198]

From detection of individual metastases to classi- fication of lymph node status at the patient level: The camelyon17 challenge,

P. B ´andiet al., “From detection of individual metastases to classi- fication of lymph node status at the patient level: The camelyon17 challenge,”IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., vol. 38, pp. 550–560, 2019

2019
[199]

Lc25000 lung and colon histopathological image dataset

A. A. Borkowskiet al., “Lc25000 lung and colon histopathological image dataset.”
[200]

100,000 histological images of human colorectal cancer and healthy tissue,

J. N. Katheret al., “100,000 histological images of human colorectal cancer and healthy tissue,” Apr. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1214456

2018 doi
[201]

Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and gleason grading of prostate cancer: the panda challenge,

W. Bultenet al., “Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and gleason grading of prostate cancer: the panda challenge,”Nat. Med., 2022

2022
[202]

Rotation equivariant cnns for digital pathology,

B. S. Veelinget al., “Rotation equivariant cnns for digital pathology,” Sep. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-030-00934-2 24

2018
[203]

Acrobat – a multi-stain breast cancer histological whole-slide-image data set from routine diagnostics for computational pathology,

P. Weitzet al., “Acrobat – a multi-stain breast cancer histological whole-slide-image data set from routine diagnostics for computational pathology,” 2022

2022
[204]

Bci: Breast cancer immunohistochemical image genera- tion through pyramid pix2pix,

S. Liuet al., “Bci: Breast cancer immunohistochemical image genera- tion through pyramid pix2pix,” inProc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog. Workshops, 2022, pp. 1815–1824

2022
[205]

Dataset empact tma,

S. Karkampouna and M. Kruithof-de Julio, “Dataset empact tma,”
[206]

Multiple instance captioning: Learning representations from histopathology textbooks and articles,

J. Gamper and N. Rajpoot, “Multiple instance captioning: Learning representations from histopathology textbooks and articles,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog., 2021

2021
[207]

Hest-1k: A dataset for spatial transcriptomics and histology image analysis,

G. Jaumeet al., “Hest-1k: A dataset for spatial transcriptomics and histology image analysis,”Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 37, pp. 53 798–53 833, 2024

2024
[208]

Pathasst: A generative foundation ai assistant towards artificial general intelligence of pathology,

Y . Sunet al., “Pathasst: A generative foundation ai assistant towards artificial general intelligence of pathology,”Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., vol. 38, pp. 5034–5042, 2024

2024
[209]

Patchgastricadc22,

M. Tsuneki and F. Kanavati, “Patchgastricadc22,” Dec. 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6021442

2021 doi
[210]

Quilt-1m: One million image-text pairs for histopathology,

W. O. Ikezogwoet al., “Quilt-1m: One million image-text pairs for histopathology,” 2025

2025
[211]

A large-scale synthetic pathological dataset for deep learning-enabled segmentation of breast cancer,

K. Dinget al., “A large-scale synthetic pathological dataset for deep learning-enabled segmentation of breast cancer,”Sci. Data, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 231, 2023

2023
[212]

Pathmmu: A massive multimodal expert-level benchmark for understanding and reasoning in pathology,

Y . Sunet al., “Pathmmu: A massive multimodal expert-level benchmark for understanding and reasoning in pathology,” 2024

2024
[213]

Pmc-vqa: Visual instruction tuning for medical visual question answering,

X. Zhanget al., “Pmc-vqa: Visual instruction tuning for medical visual question answering,” 2024

2024
[214]

A survey on training challenges in generative adversarial networks for biomed. image anal

M. M. Saadet al., “A survey on training challenges in generative adversarial networks for biomed. image anal.”Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 57, no. 2, p. 19, 2024

2024
[215]

Survey of hallucination in natural language generation,

Z. Jiet al., “Survey of hallucination in natural language generation,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 1–38, 2023

2023
[216]

Generative AI for computational pathology,

S. P. Deshpande, “Generative AI for computational pathology,” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Warwick, Coventry, U.K., Aug. 2023

2023
[217]

Generative adversarial networks: A survey toward private and secure applications,

Z. Caiet al., “Generative adversarial networks: A survey toward private and secure applications,”ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1–38, 2021

2021
[218]

Metrics that matter: Evaluating image quality metrics for medical image generation,

Y . Deoet al., “Metrics that matter: Evaluating image quality metrics for medical image generation,”arXiv:2505.07175, 2025

2025 arXiv
[219]

A survey on generative diffusion models,

H. Caoet al., “A survey on generative diffusion models,”IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 2814–2830, 2024

2024
[220]

Mathenyet al.,Artificial intelligence in health care: The hope, the hype, the promise, the peril

M. Mathenyet al.,Artificial intelligence in health care: The hope, the hype, the promise, the peril. National Academies Press, 2022, vol. 2019

2022
[221]

The state of artificial intelligence-based fda- approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database,

S. Benjamenset al., “The state of artificial intelligence-based fda- approved medical devices and algorithms: an online database,”NPJ Digit. Med., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 118, 2020

2020
[222]

Toward fairness in artificial intelligence for med. image anal.: identification and mitigation of potential biases in the roadmap from data collection to model deployment,

K. Drukkeret al., “Toward fairness in artificial intelligence for med. image anal.: identification and mitigation of potential biases in the roadmap from data collection to model deployment,”J. Med. Imag., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 061 104–061 104, 2023

2023
[223]

Scaling laws for neural language models,

J. Kaplanet al., “Scaling laws for neural language models,” arXiv:2001.08361, 2020

2001 arXiv
[224]

Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle- consistent adversarial networks,

J.-Y . Zhuet al., “Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle- consistent adversarial networks,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Vis., 2017, pp. 2223–2232

2017
[225]

The compute divide in machine learning: A threat to academic contribution and scrutiny?

T. Besirogluet al., “The compute divide in machine learning: A threat to academic contribution and scrutiny?”arXiv:2401.02452, 2024

2024 arXiv
[226]

State of the art: Reproducibility in artificial intelligence,

O. E. Gundersen and S. Kjensmo, “State of the art: Reproducibility in artificial intelligence,” inProc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., vol. 32, no. 1, 2018

2018
[227]

Synthetic data in ai: Challenges, applications, and ethical implications,

S. Haoet al., “Synthetic data in ai: Challenges, applications, and ethical implications,”arXiv:2401.01629, 2024

2024 arXiv
[228]

Virchow2: Scaling self-supervised mixed magnification models in pathology,

E. Zimmermannet al., “Virchow2: Scaling self-supervised mixed magnification models in pathology,” 2024

2024
[229]

Agent ai: Surveying the horizons of multimodal interaction,

Z. Duranteet al., “Agent ai: Surveying the horizons of multimodal interaction,”arXiv:2401.03568, 2024

2024 arXiv
[230]

How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelli- gence: Priorities and opportunities,

C. Bunneet al., “How to build the virtual cell with artificial intelli- gence: Priorities and opportunities,”Cell, vol. 187, no. 25, pp. 7045– 7063, 2024

2024
[231]

The human cell atlas from a cell census to a unified foundation model,

J. E. Roodet al., “The human cell atlas from a cell census to a unified foundation model,”Nature, vol. 637, no. 8048, pp. 1065–1071, 2025

2025
[232]

Systematic inference of super-resolution cell spatial profiles from histology images,

P. Zhanget al., “Systematic inference of super-resolution cell spatial profiles from histology images,”Nat. Commun., vol. 16, no. 1, p. 1838, 2025

2025
[233]

Embracing generative artificial intelligence in clinical research and beyond: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions,

H. P. Footeet al., “Embracing generative artificial intelligence in clinical research and beyond: Opportunities, challenges, and solutions,” JACC: Adv., vol. 4, no. 3, p. 101593, 2025

2025
[234]

Governance of clinical ai applications to facilitate safe and equitable deployment in a large health system: key elements and early successes,

F. Liaoet al., “Governance of clinical ai applications to facilitate safe and equitable deployment in a large health system: key elements and early successes,”Front. Digit. Health, vol. 4, p. 931439, 2022

2022
[2023]

Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10066853

[Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10066853

doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [177]

A visual–language foundation model for pathology image analysis using medical twitter,

Z. Huanget al., “A visual–language foundation model for pathology image analysis using medical twitter,”Nat. Med., vol. 29, pp. 2307– 2316, 2023

work page 2023

[2] [181]

A whole-slide foundation model for digital pathology from real-world data,

H. Xuet al., “A whole-slide foundation model for digital pathology from real-world data,”Nature, vol. 630, pp. 181–188, 2024

work page 2024

[3] [182]

Towards a generalizable pathology foundation model via unified knowledge distillation,

J. Maet al., “Towards a generalizable pathology foundation model via unified knowledge distillation,” 2025

work page 2025

[4] [44]

Unsupervised learning for cell-level visual representation in histopathology images with generative adversarial networks,

B. Huet al., “Unsupervised learning for cell-level visual representation in histopathology images with generative adversarial networks,”IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1316–1328, Jul. 2019

2019

[5] [178]

Promptable representation distribution learning and data augmentation for gigapixel histopathology wsi analysis,

K. Tanget al., “Promptable representation distribution learning and data augmentation for gigapixel histopathology wsi analysis,”Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., vol. 39, pp. 7247–7256, 2025

work page 2025

[6] [83]

Prototype-guided diffusion for digital pathology: Achieving foundation model performance with minimal clinical data,

E. Redekopet al., “Prototype-guided diffusion for digital pathology: Achieving foundation model performance with minimal clinical data,” inProc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recog. Workshops, June 2025, pp. 5187–5195

2025

[7] [1]

Synthetic data in biomedicine via generative artificial intelligence,

B. van Breugelet al., “Synthetic data in biomedicine via generative artificial intelligence,”Nat. Rev. Bioeng., vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 991–1004, Oct. 2024

2024

[8] [2]

Shifting machine learning for healthcare from development to deployment and from models to data,

A. Zhanget al., “Shifting machine learning for healthcare from development to deployment and from models to data,”Nat. Biomed. Eng., vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1330–1345, Dec. 2022

2022