Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Heart2Mind: Human-Centered Contestable Psychiatric Disorder Diagnosis System using Wearable ECG Monitors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.11612 v1 pith:G6Q4SQXN submitted 2025-05-16 cs.AI cs.HC

classification cs.AIcs.HC
keywords contestablediagnosispsychiatricsystemheart2mindllmswearablecardiac
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Psychiatric disorders affect millions globally, yet their diagnosis faces significant challenges in clinical practice due to subjective assessments and accessibility concerns, leading to potential delays in treatment. To help address this issue, we present Heart2Mind, a human-centered contestable psychiatric disorder diagnosis system using wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) monitors. Our approach leverages cardiac biomarkers, particularly heart rate variability (HRV) and R-R intervals (RRI) time series, as objective indicators of autonomic dysfunction in psychiatric conditions. The system comprises three key components: (1) a Cardiac Monitoring Interface (CMI) for real-time data acquisition from Polar H9/H10 devices; (2) a Multi-Scale Temporal-Frequency Transformer (MSTFT) that processes RRI time series through integrated time-frequency domain analysis; (3) a Contestable Diagnosis Interface (CDI) combining Self-Adversarial Explanations (SAEs) with contestable Large Language Models (LLMs). Our MSTFT achieves 91.7% accuracy on the HRV-ACC dataset using leave-one-out cross-validation, outperforming state-of-the-art methods. SAEs successfully detect inconsistencies in model predictions by comparing attention-based and gradient-based explanations, while LLMs enable clinicians to validate correct predictions and contest erroneous ones. This work demonstrates the feasibility of combining wearable technology with Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) and contestable LLMs to create a transparent, contestable system for psychiatric diagnosis that maintains clinical oversight while leveraging advanced AI capabilities. Our implementation is publicly available at: https://github.com/Analytics-Everywhere-Lab/heart2mind.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ConGaIT: A Clinician-Centered Dashboard for Contestable AI in Parkinson's Disease Care

    cs.HC 2025-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper presents ConGaIT, a dashboard embedding contestable AI mechanisms for PD gait analysis, and reports a high contestability score based on an unvalidated proxy evaluation.

  2. Privacy-Preserving Multi-Stage Fall Detection Framework with Semi-supervised Federated Learning and Robotic Vision Confirmation

    cs.CV 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-stage fall detection system combining federated IMU classification, BLE localization, and robot vision claims 99.99% accuracy, but the combined accuracy calculation is mathematically invalid.

  3. Multimedia Verification Through Multi-Agent Deep Research Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A six-stage multi-agent MLLM pipeline with reverse image search, metadata analysis, and fact-checking tools is demonstrated on a single Ukraine missile-strike video, with no quantitative evaluation.

Pith tools