Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 95 references

BenSParX: A Robust Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Parkinson's Disease Detection from Bengali Conversational Speech

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A Bengali speech dataset and tuned classical pipeline detect Parkinson's disease at 95.77% accuracy, with SHAP-based explanations linking predictions to known vocal impairments.

desk verdict The first Bengali PD speech dataset is a genuine contribution, but the headline accuracy of 95.77% is likely inflated by leakage in feature selection and an unadjusted age confound. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.12192 v1 pith:43BTRLUG submitted 2025-05-18 cs.LG cs.SDeess.AS

Riad Hossain , Muhammad Ashad Kabir , Arat Ibne Golam Mowla , Animesh Chandra Roy , Ranjit Kumar Ghosh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LGcs.SDeess.AS
keywords Parkinson'sdiseaseBengalispeechvoicebiomarkersacousticfeatureselectionmachinelearningSHAPexplainabilityconversational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces BenSParX, the first publicly available Bengali conversational speech dataset for Parkinson's disease (PD) detection, together with a machine-learning framework that combines 71 acoustic features, four feature-selection strategies, nine classifiers with hyperparameter tuning, and SHAP explanations. The authors claim state-of-the-art performance on their dataset: 95.77% accuracy, 95.57% F1 score, and an AUC-ROC of 0.982 with a support vector machine using features selected by recursive feature elimination with cross-validation and gradient boosting. They also report that the same framework outperforms previously published results on four external PD voice datasets in other languages. A sympathetic reader would care because the work extends voice-based PD screening to a language spoken by over 230 million people and shows that a rigorously tuned classical pipeline can match or beat deep-learning baselines while remaining interpretable.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the multi-stage feature selection pipeline. Seventy-one handcrafted acoustic features, extracted with Praat, are filtered and ranked by four complementary methods: recursive feature elimination with cross-validation (RFECV) run with six different base classifiers, LASSO regularization, Relief-F ranking followed by sequential forward selection, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Each selected subset feeds nine tuned classifiers, and the best overall model is an SVM trained on the 63 features chosen by RFECV with gradient boosting. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) then assigns per-feature contribution values to the final model, connecting each prediction to interpretable acoustic markers.

What would settle it

Retrain the same BenSParX pipeline on age-matched subgroups drawn from the published dataset (for example, restricting both classes to the overlapping 43-57 age range), or add age as a feature and inspect its SHAP value; if accuracy drops substantially below 95.77% or age becomes a top predictor, the central claim of PD-specific detection is weakened. A second test is an independent Bengali cohort recorded with the same phone-call protocol.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Parkinson's disease can be detected from natural Bengali conversational speech with accuracy comparable to or better than existing voice-based detectors, using a deliberately broad acoustic feature set and systematic feature selection. The paper demonstrates that features often neglected in prior work—formants and glottal-pulse statistics—carry real discriminative signal, with all four formant and all four pulse features retained in the best-performing model. The best configuration (SVM with 63 features selected by RFECV using gradient boosting) reaches 95.77% accuracy and 0.982 AUC on the Bengali dataset, and the framework is claimed to consistently outperform state-of-the-art methods on the Sakar18, Little, Naranjo, and MDVR-KCL datasets. The paper also shows that SHAP attributions for this model line up with clinically established PD speech impairments: energy instability, reduced harmonicity, elevated jitter and shimmer, and articulatory imprecision.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes the PD and healthy control groups differ only in disease status, specifically that the roughly nine-year average age gap (59.4 versus 50.5 years) does not materially drive the voice classification, because the study never adjusts for age or verifies that PD-specific vocal changes—not age-related vocal aging—produce the separation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported accuracy holds in independent cohorts, a phone-call-based screening tool could be deployed for Bengali-speaking populations with no specialized recording equipment.
  • Formant and glottal-pulse features, rarely used in prior PD voice studies, should be included in future acoustic analyses rather than relying on MFCCs, jitter, and shimmer alone.
  • The framework's external results suggest that careful feature selection plus classical classifiers can be a strong baseline that deep-learning models should be measured against on small tabular acoustic datasets.
  • SHAP explanations could give clinicians per-patient rationales linking a positive screening result to specific, known dysphonia markers.
  • Releasing the dataset publicly invites re-analysis and cross-linguistic comparison, which is a precondition for any clinical adoption.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper compares against published numbers from other studies rather than re-running every competing method under identical train/test splits, so the 'consistently outperforms' claim should be read as accuracy against reported results, not a controlled benchmark.
  • An immediate testable extension is age-matched re-analysis: because the PD group averages 59.4 years versus 50.5 for healthy controls, retraining on age-balanced subgroups would reveal how much of the 95.77% accuracy is disease-specific versus age-related voice change.
  • A strong generalization probe would be zero-shot or fine-tuned transfer from Bengali to an unrelated language (e.g., Turkish or Spanish) using the same acoustic pipeline, testing whether the selected features capture PD-specific dysphonia rather than language-specific artifacts.
  • The framework's reliance on Praat handcrafted features suggests a natural comparison with end-to-end deep embeddings (e.g., Wav2Vec2) on the same dataset to see whether the engineered features retain an advantage.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces BenSParX, the first Bengali conversational speech dataset for Parkinson's disease (PD) detection, collected from 120 speakers (60 PD, 60 healthy controls) via phone recordings and segmented into 900 ten-second samples. The authors propose a classical machine learning pipeline that extracts 71 acoustic features (MFCCs, jitter, shimmer, formants, pulse, intensity, pitch, harmonicity), applies four feature selection techniques (RFECV, LASSO, Relief-F+SFS, Mann-Whitney U), tunes nine classifiers with RandomizedSearch, and uses SHAP for explainability. The central claims are that the framework achieves state-of-the-art performance on the new Bengali dataset (accuracy 95.77%, F1 95.57%, AUC-ROC 0.982) and consistently outperforms prior published approaches on four external PD voice datasets. The dataset is publicly released.

Significance. If the reported results are valid, the paper makes two useful contributions: a new publicly available Bengali conversational speech dataset for PD research, addressing a genuine linguistic gap, and a reproducible classical-ML pipeline with feature selection, hyperparameter tuning, and SHAP-based interpretability. The external validation across four datasets in different languages is a commendable attempt to demonstrate generalizability, and the authors explicitly recognize the need for group-wise evaluation with multiple segments per speaker. However, the central performance claims currently rest on a methodological ambiguity about whether feature selection and hyperparameter tuning are nested inside the group-wise cross-validation, and on an uncontrolled age difference between the PD and healthy control groups. These issues are load-bearing for the headline accuracy and for the external comparisons.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.4, §4.1, §4.3]
  2. [Table 3, §3.1, §5.1]
  3. [Table 8]
  4. [§4.6, Table 10]
minor comments (5)
  1. [Figure 7]
  2. [§3.1]
  3. [§3.3]
  4. [§3.4.3]
  5. [Data availability]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the accuracy claims are empirical evaluations on held-out folds and independent public benchmarks, not outputs defined by their inputs.

full rationale

BenSParX is an empirical ML study rather than a derivation: raw audio is preprocessed, handcrafted features are extracted, four feature-selection strategies and nine classifiers are benchmarked under group-wise 10-fold CV, and SHAP is applied post hoc. The headline numbers (95.77% accuracy, 95.57% F1, 0.982 AUC) are computed from held-out folds of the newly collected Bengali dataset, and the external validation on Sakar18, Little, Naranjo, and MDVR-KCL recomputes the pipeline on public data, so those results do not reduce to any fitted parameter of the Bengali model. I found no equation in the paper in which a predicted quantity is defined in terms of the quantity it is supposed to explain, and no load-bearing self-citation: the authors' previous works cited (e.g., [13,34]) appear only as related-work support for voice-based screening and are not used to justify a unique model choice or to forbid alternatives. The Limitations section honestly records threats to external validity (single session, no severity/medication metadata, homogeneous demographics), but these are validity concerns, not circularity. Feature-selection and hyperparameter-tuning leakage into the outer CV would be a correctness risk if present, but it is not a self-definitional reduction of the reported metrics; the reported test-fold metrics are not identical to the selection objective by construction. The only self-referential element is evaluating a new dataset paper on its own dataset, which is standard and does not make the evaluation circular, especially given the external benchmarks. Overall, no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework's central claim depends on the validity of Praat-based features, the assumption that preprocessing preserves disease-relevant cues, and the comparability of the PD and HC groups. Hyperparameters tuned on the data are free parameters. No new physical or theoretical entities are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • SVM C = 100
    Tuned via random search on training folds (Table 7).
  • SVM kernel = poly
    Tuned via random search (Table 7).
  • SVM degree = 3
    Tuned via random search (Table 7).
  • Random Forest n_estimators = 500
    Tuned via random search (Table 7).
  • Random Forest max_depth = 50
    Tuned via random search (Table 7).
  • XGBoost n_estimators = 500
    Tuned via random search (Table 7).
  • XGBoost max_depth = 6
    Tuned via random search (Table 7).
  • Gradient Boosting learning_rate = 0.1
    Tuned via random search (Table 7).
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Praat's acoustic feature extraction algorithms yield valid measurements of the speech parameters relevant to PD.
    All 71 features are computed by Praat; the paper does not validate these measurements against ground truth or alternative extraction methods.
  • domain assumption The preprocessing steps (noise reduction and speaker separation) do not differentially distort PD and HC speech in a way that drives classification.
    Section 3.2 describes noise reduction and voice separation qualitatively; no validation that these steps preserve disease-specific cues or treat both groups equally.
  • domain assumption PD and HC participants are comparable except for disease status, i.e., age and other demographics do not confound voice features.
    Table 3 shows PD patients are about nine years older on average; the paper does not adjust for age in the analysis, so age-related voice changes could drive part of the classification signal.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of BenSParX: A Robust Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Parkinson's Disease Detection from Bengali Conversational Speech." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/43BTRLUG

@misc{pith2026250512192,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: BenSParX: A Robust Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Parkinson's Disease Detection from Bengali Conversational Speech},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/43BTRLUG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.12192}
}
read the original abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD) poses a growing global health challenge, with Bangladesh experiencing a notable rise in PD-related mortality. Early detection of PD remains particularly challenging in resource-constrained settings, where voice-based analysis has emerged as a promising non-invasive and cost-effective alternative. However, existing studies predominantly focus on English or other major languages; notably, no voice dataset for PD exists for Bengali - posing a significant barrier to culturally inclusive and accessible healthcare solutions. Moreover, most prior studies employed only a narrow set of acoustic features, with limited or no hyperparameter tuning and feature selection strategies, and little attention to model explainability. This restricts the development of a robust and generalizable machine learning model. To address this gap, we present BenSparX, the first Bengali conversational speech dataset for PD detection, along with a robust and explainable machine learning framework tailored for early diagnosis. The proposed framework incorporates diverse acoustic feature categories, systematic feature selection methods, and state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms with extensive hyperparameter optimization. Furthermore, to enhance interpretability and trust in model predictions, the framework incorporates SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis to quantify the contribution of individual acoustic features toward PD detection. Our framework achieves state-of-the-art performance, yielding an accuracy of 95.77%, F1 score of 95.57%, and AUC-ROC of 0.982. We further externally validated our approach by applying the framework to existing PD datasets in other languages, where it consistently outperforms state-of-the-art approaches. To facilitate further research and reproducibility, the dataset has been made publicly available at https://github.com/Riad071/BenSParX.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.12192 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A schematic overview of the BenSParX framework for Parkinson’s disease detection. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Preprocessing steps for raw audio recordings. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. presents a visual comparison of MFCC spectrograms extracted from a PD patient and an HC. The PD spectrogram (Figure 3a) exhibits greater spectral irregularities and reduced contrast across time, particularly in lower frequency regions. In contrast, the HC spectrogram (Figure 3b) shows a more stable and structured spectral pattern. These visual differences reflect common speech impairments in PD, such as tremor, redu… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Intensity profile for a PD and an HC sample. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Pitch contour for a PD and an HC sample. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Jitter contour for a PD and an HC sample. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Shimmer contour for a PD and an HC sample. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of formant frequency trajectories (f1–f4) for a Parkinson’s disease (PD) patient and a healthy control (HC). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Pulse for a PD and an HC sample. In this study, we extracted glottal pulses from the recorded audio and computed key statistical features: the total number of pulses, the number of periods (i.e., intervals between successive pulses), the mean period dura￾tion, and the …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Harmonicity for a PD and an HC sample. shimmer, intensity, and formants-related features also showed high discriminative power (p < 0.001), reflecting instability in frequency, amplitude, and loudness—key markers of hypokinetic dysarthria. Harmonicity (HNR) and pitch …
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Visualization of t-SNE results showing the distribution of Healthy and Parkinson’s samples after dimensionality reduction: (a) 2D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: An outline of the RFECV procedure for feature selection using Classifier. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: An outline of the Relief-F procedure for feature selection using Classifier. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: SHAP summary plot illustrating the impact of top features on the best-performing model’s output for Parkinson’s disease detection. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: SHAP waterfall plot for a Parkinson’s disease (PD) detection instance, illustrating the top 10 feature values contributing to the final [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: SHAP waterfall plot for a healthy control (HC) detection instance, illustrating the top 10 feature values contributing to the final model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Automated detection of parkinson’s disease based on multiple types of sustained phonations using linear discriminant analysis and genetically optimized neural network

    Ali, L., Zhu, C., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y ., 2019. Automated detection of parkinson’s disease based on multiple types of sustained phonations using linear discriminant analysis and genetically optimized neural network. IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine 7, 1–10

    2019

  2. [2]

    Speech impairment in parkinson’s disease: Acoustic analysis of unvoiced consonants in italian native speakers

    Amato, F., Borz `ı, L., Olmo, G., Artusi, C.A., Imbalzano, G., Lopiano, L., 2021. Speech impairment in parkinson’s disease: Acoustic analysis of unvoiced consonants in italian native speakers. IEEE Access 9, 166370–166381. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3135626

    arXiv 2021

  3. [3]

    Acoustic analysis of prosody in females with parkinson’s disease: comparison with normal controls

    Azevedo, L.L., Cardoso, F., Reis, C., 2003. Acoustic analysis of prosody in females with parkinson’s disease: comparison with normal controls. Arq. Neuro-Psiquiatr. 61, 999–1003

    2003

  4. [4]

    Comprehensive multimodal approach for parkinson’s disease classification using artificial intelligence: insights and model explainability

    Balaha, H.M., Hassan, A.E.S., Ahmed, R.A., Balaha, M.H., 2025. Comprehensive multimodal approach for parkinson’s disease classification using artificial intelligence: insights and model explainability. Soft Computing , 1–33

    2025

  5. [5]

    Pathophysiology of bradykinesia in parkinson’s disease

    Berardelli, A., Rothwell, J.C., Thompson, P.D., Hallett, M., 2001. Pathophysiology of bradykinesia in parkinson’s disease. Brain 124, 2131–2146

    2001

  6. [6]

    Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning

    Bishop, C.M., 2006. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer

    2006

  7. [7]

    The mpower study, parkinson disease mobile data collected using researchkit

    Bot, B.M., Suver, C., Neto, E.C., Kellen, M., Klein, A., Bare, C., Doerr, M., Pratap, A., Wilbanks, J., Dorsey, E., et al., 2016. The mpower study, parkinson disease mobile data collected using researchkit. Scientific data 3, 1–9

    2016

  8. [8]

    Automatic detection of parkinson’s disease based on acoustic analysis of speech

    Braga, D., Madureira, A.M., Coelho, L., Ajith, R., 2019. Automatic detection of parkinson’s disease based on acoustic analysis of speech. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 77, 148–158

    2019

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    Random forests

    Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine learning 45, 5–32

    2001

  2. [10]

    Multimodal audio-based disease prediction with transformer-based hierarchical fusion network

    Cai, J., Wang, R., Zhao, D., Yuan, Z., McKenna, V ., Friedman, A., Foot, R., Storey, S., Boente, R., Vhaduri, S., et al., 2025. Multimodal audio-based disease prediction with transformer-based hierarchical fusion network. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing

    2025

  3. [11]

    Speech and language biomarkers for parkinson’s disease prediction, early diagnosis and progression

    Cao, F., V ogel, A.P., Gharahkhani, P., Renteria, M.E., 2025. Speech and language biomarkers for parkinson’s disease prediction, early diagnosis and progression. npj Parkinson’s Disease 11, 57

    2025

  4. [12]

    Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system, in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp

    Chen, T., Guestrin, C., 2016. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system, in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 785–794

    2016

  5. [13]

    Machine learning for detecting covid-19 from cough sounds: An ensemble-based mcdm method

    Chowdhury, N.K., Kabir, M.A., Rahman, M.M., Islam, S.M.S., 2022. Machine learning for detecting covid-19 from cough sounds: An ensemble-based mcdm method. Computers in Biology and Medicine 145, 105405. doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105405

    2022

  6. [14]

    Support-vector networks

    Cortes, C., Vapnik, V ., 1995. Support-vector networks. Machine learning 20, 273–297

    1995

  7. [15]

    Nearest neighbor pattern classification

    Cover, T., Hart, P., 1967. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE transactions on information theory 13, 21–27

    1967

  8. [16]

    Machine learning-assisted speech analysis for early detection of parkinson’s disease: A study on speaker diarization and classification techniques

    Di Cesare, M.G., Perpetuini, D., Cardone, D., Merla, A., 2024. Machine learning-assisted speech analysis for early detection of parkinson’s disease: A study on speaker diarization and classification techniques. Sensors 24, 1499

    2024

  9. [17]

    Assessment of speech intelligibility in parkinson’s disease using a speech-to-text system

    Dimauro, G., Di Nicola, V ., Bevilacqua, V ., Caivano, D., Girardi, F., 2017. Assessment of speech intelligibility in parkinson’s disease using a speech-to-text system. IEEE Access 5, 22199–22208

    2017

  10. [18]

    El-Habbak, O.M., Abdelalim, A.M., Mohamed, N.H., Abd-Elaty, H.M., Hammouda, M.A., Mohamed, Y .Y ., Taifor, M.A., Mohamed, A.W., xlii

  11. [19]

    Unveiling early signs of parkinson’s disease via a longitudinal analysis of celebrity speech recordings

    Favaro, A., Butala, A., Thebaud, T., Villalba, J., Dehak, N., Moro-Vel ´azquez, L., 2024. Unveiling early signs of parkinson’s disease via a longitudinal analysis of celebrity speech recordings. npj Parkinson’s Disease 10, 207

    2024

  12. [20]

    Multilingual evaluation of interpretable biomarkers to represent language and speech patterns in parkinson’s disease

    Favaro, A., Moro-Vel ´azquez, L., Butala, A., Motley, C., Cao, T., Stevens, R.D., Villalba, J., Dehak, N., 2023a. Multilingual evaluation of interpretable biomarkers to represent language and speech patterns in parkinson’s disease. Frontiers in Neurology 14, 1142642

  13. [21]

    Interpretable speech features vs

    Favaro, A., Tsai, Y .T., Butala, A., Thebaud, T., Villalba, J., Dehak, N., Moro-Vel ´azquez, L., 2023b. Interpretable speech features vs. dnn embeddings: What to use in the automatic assessment of parkinson’s disease in multi-lingual scenarios. Computers in Biology and Medicin...

  14. [22]

    A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting

    Freund, Y ., Schapire, R.E., 1997. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of computer and system sciences 55, 119–139

    1997

  15. [23]

    Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine

    Friedman, J.H., 2001. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of statistics 29, 1189–1232

    2001

  16. [24]

    Innovative speech-based deep learning approaches for parkinson’s disease classification: A systematic review

    van Gelderen, L., Tejedor-Garc ´ıa, C., 2024. Innovative speech-based deep learning approaches for parkinson’s disease classification: A systematic review. Applied Sciences 14, 7873. doi:10.3390/app14177873

    2024 doi

  17. [25]

    Diagnosis of parkinson’s disease based on voice signals using shap and hard voting ensemble method

    Ghaheri, P., Nasiri, H., Shateri, A., Homafar, A., 2024. Diagnosis of parkinson’s disease based on voice signals using shap and hard voting ensemble method. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering 27, 1858–1874

    2024

  18. [26]

    Deep learning-based parkinson’s disease classification using vocal feature sets

    Gunduz, H., 2019. Deep learning-based parkinson’s disease classification using vocal feature sets. Ieee access 7, 115540–115551

    2019

  19. [27]

    Parkinson hastalı ˘gı tespitinde farklı boyutsallık indirgeme y ¨ontemlerinin kars ¸ılas ¸tırılması

    G ¨und¨uz, H., 2019. Parkinson hastalı ˘gı tespitinde farklı boyutsallık indirgeme y ¨ontemlerinin kars ¸ılas ¸tırılması. Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi , 1164–1172

    2019

  20. [28]

    An efficient dimensionality reduction method using filter-based feature selection and variational autoencoders on parkin- son’s disease classification

    Gunduz, H., 2021. An efficient dimensionality reduction method using filter-based feature selection and variational autoencoders on parkin- son’s disease classification. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 66, 102452

    2021

  21. [29]

    Improving detection of parkinson’s disease with acoustic feature optimization using particle swarm optimization and machine learning

    Hadjaidji, E., Amara Korba, M.C., Khelil, K., 2025. Improving detection of parkinson’s disease with acoustic feature optimization using particle swarm optimization and machine learning. Machine Learning: Science and Technology 6, 015026. doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ adadc3

    2025 doi

  22. [30]

    Acoustic characteristics of parkinsonian speech: a potential biomarker of early disease progression and treatment

    Harel, B.T., Cannizzaro, M.S., Cohen, H., Reilly, N., Snyder, P.J., 2004. Acoustic characteristics of parkinsonian speech: a potential biomarker of early disease progression and treatment. Journal of Neurolinguistics 17, 439–453

    2004

  23. [31]

    Early biomarkers of Parkinson’s disease based on natural connected speech

    Hlavni ˇcka, J., ˇCmejla, R., Tykalov´a, T., ˇSonka, K., R ˚uˇziˇcka, E., Rusz, J., 2017. Early biomarkers of Parkinson’s disease based on natural connected speech. UCI Machine Learning Repository. doi:https://doi.org/10.24432/C5W02Q

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    Speech impairment in a large sample of patients with parkinson’s disease

    Ho, A.K., Iansek, R., Marigliani, C., Bradshaw, J.L., Gates, S., 1999. Speech impairment in a large sample of patients with parkinson’s disease. Behavioural neurology 11, 131–137

    1999

  25. [33]

    Applied Logistic Regression

    Hosmer Jr, D.W., Lemeshow, S., Sturdivant, R.X., 2013. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons

    2013

  26. [34]

    Robust covid-19 detection from cough sounds using deep neural decision tree and forest: A comprehensive cross-datasets evaluation

    Islam, R., Chowdhury, N.K., Kabir, M.A., 2025. Robust covid-19 detection from cough sounds using deep neural decision tree and forest: A comprehensive cross-datasets evaluation. arXiv doi:10.48550/arXiv.2501.01117

    2025 doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    A machine learning method to process voice samples for identification of parkinson’s disease

    Iyer, A., Kemp, A., Rahmatallah, Y ., Pillai, L., Glover, A., Prior, F., Larson-Prior, L., Virmani, T., 2023. A machine learning method to process voice samples for identification of parkinson’s disease. Scientific reports 13, 20615

    2023

  28. [36]

    Mobile device voice recordings at king’s college london (mdvr-kcl) from both early and advanced parkinson’s disease patients and healthy controls

    Jaeger, H., Trivedi, D., Stadtschnitzer, M., 2019. Mobile device voice recordings at king’s college london (mdvr-kcl) from both early and advanced parkinson’s disease patients and healthy controls. Zenodo

    2019

  29. [37]

    Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in parkinson’s disease: clinical manifestations

    Jankovic, J., 2005. Motor fluctuations and dyskinesias in parkinson’s disease: clinical manifestations. Movement disorders: official journal of the Movement Disorder Society 20, S11–S16

    2005

  30. [38]

    Machine learning-based classification of parkinson’s disease using acoustic features: Insights from multilingual speech tasks

    Jeong, S.M., Song, Y .D., Seok, C.L., Lee, J.Y ., Lee, E.C., Kim, H.J., 2024. Machine learning-based classification of parkinson’s disease using acoustic features: Insights from multilingual speech tasks. Computers in Biology and Medicine 182, 109078

    2024

  31. [39]

    Kurada, S., Kurada, A., 2020. Poster: Vggish embeddings based audio classifiers to improve parkinson’s disease diagnosis, in: 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE), ACM. pp. 9– xliii

    2020

  32. [40]

    A cross-language speech model for detection of parkinson’s disease

    Lim, W.S., Chiu, S.I., Peng, P.L., Jang, J.S.R., Lee, S.H., Lin, C.H., Kim, H.J., 2025. A cross-language speech model for detection of parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neural Transmission 132, 579–590

    2025

  33. [41]

    doi:10.1145/3384420.3431775

  34. [42]

    Suitability of dysphonia measurements for telemonitoring of parkinson’s disease

    Little, M.A., McSharry, P.E., Hunter, E.J., Spielman, J., Ramig, L.O., 2009. Suitability of dysphonia measurements for telemonitoring of parkinson’s disease. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 56, 1015–1022

    2009

  35. [43]

    Parkinsons

    Little, M., 2007. Parkinsons. UCI Machine Learning Repository. doi:https://doi.org/10.24432/C59C74

    2007 doi

  36. [44]

    Investigating the effectiveness of explainability methods in parkinson’s detection from speech

    Mancini, E., Paissan, F., Torroni, P., Ravanelli, M., Subakan, C., 2024. Investigating the effectiveness of explainability methods in parkinson’s detection from speech. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08013

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    V oice changes in parkinson’s disease: What are they telling us? Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 72, 1–7

    Ma, A., Lau, K.K., Thyagarajan, D., 2020. V oice changes in parkinson’s disease: What are they telling us? Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 72, 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2019.12.029

    2020 doi

  38. [46]

    A two-stage variable selection and classification approach for parkinson’s disease detection by using voice recording replications

    Naranjo, L., P ´erez, C.J., Mart´ın, J., Campos-Roca, Y ., 2017. A two-stage variable selection and classification approach for parkinson’s disease detection by using voice recording replications. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 142, 147–156. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb. 2...

    2017 doi

  39. [47]

    Parkinson’s disease detection using smartphone recorded phonemes in real world conditions

    Motin, M.A., Pah, N.D., Raghav, S., Kumar, D.K., 2022. Parkinson’s disease detection using smartphone recorded phonemes in real world conditions. IEEE Access 10, 97600–97609. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3203973

    2022

  40. [48]

    Computerized analysis of speech and voice for parkinson’s disease: A systematic review

    Ngo, Q.C., Motin, M.A., Pah, N.D., Drot ´ar, P., Kempster, P., Kumar, D., 2022. Computerized analysis of speech and voice for parkinson’s disease: A systematic review. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 226, 107133. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107133

    2022

  41. [49]

    The detection of parkinson’s disease from speech using voice source information

    Narendra, N., Schuller, B., Alku, P., 2021. The detection of parkinson’s disease from speech using voice source information. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 29, 1925–1936. doi:10.1109/TASLP.2021.3078364

    2021

  42. [50]

    Application of neural networks in early detection and diagnosis of parkin- son’s disease, in: 2014 International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), pp

    Olanrewaju, R.F., Sahari, N.S., Musa, A.A., Hakiem, N., 2014. Application of neural networks in early detection and diagnosis of parkin- son’s disease, in: 2014 International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), pp. 78–82. doi:10.1109/CITSM.2014. 7042180

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    V oice-based detection of parkinson’s disease through ensemble machine learning approach: A performance study

    Nissar, I., Rizvi, D.R., Masood, S., Mir, A.N., 2019. V oice-based detection of parkinson’s disease through ensemble machine learning approach: A performance study. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology 5, e2–e2

    2019

  44. [52]

    M-ark-support vector machine for early detection of parkinson’s disease from speech signals

    Parisi, L., Ma, R., Zaernia, A., Youseffi, M., 2021. M-ark-support vector machine for early detection of parkinson’s disease from speech signals. Int J Math Comput Simul 15, 34

    2021

  45. [53]

    New spanish speech corpus database for the analysis of people suffering from parkinson’s disease., in: Lrec, pp

    Orozco-Arroyave, J.R., Arias-Londo ˜no, J.D., Vargas-Bonilla, J.F., Gonzalez-R ´ativa, M.C., N ¨oth, E., 2014. New spanish speech corpus database for the analysis of people suffering from parkinson’s disease., in: Lrec, pp. 342–347

    2014

  46. [54]

    Pinto, S., Cardoso, R., Atkinson-Clement, C., Guimar ˜aes, I., Sadat, J., Santos, H., Mercier, C., Carvalho, J., Cuartero, M.C., Oliveira, P., et al.,

  47. [55]

    An essay on the shaking palsy

    Parkinson, J., 2002. An essay on the shaking palsy. The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences 14, 223–236

    2002

  48. [56]

    Parkinson disease classification using one against all based data sampling with the acoustic features from the speech signals

    Polat, K., Nour, M., 2020. Parkinson disease classification using one against all based data sampling with the acoustic features from the speech signals. Medical Hypotheses 140, 109678

    2020

  49. [57]

    V oice changes in prodromal parkinson’s disease: Is a new biomarker within earshot? Sleep Medicine 19

    Postuma, R.B., 2016. V oice changes in prodromal parkinson’s disease: Is a new biomarker within earshot? Sleep Medicine 19

    2016

  50. [58]

    Polat, K., 2019. A hybrid approach to parkinson disease classification using speech signal: The combination of smote and random forests, in: 2019 Scientific Meeting on Electrical-Electronics & Biomedical Engineering and Computer Science (EBBT), pp. 1–3. doi:10.1109/EBBT. 2019.8741725

    2019

  51. [59]

    Early detection of parkinson’s disease through patient questionnaire and predictive modelling

    Prashanth, R., Roy, S.D., 2018. Early detection of parkinson’s disease through patient questionnaire and predictive modelling. International journal of medical informatics 119, 75–87

    2018

  52. [60]

    Parkinson Dataset with replicated acoustic features

    Prez, C., 2016. Parkinson Dataset with replicated acoustic features . UCI Machine Learning Repository. Doi:https://doi.org/10. xliv 24432/C5701F

    2016

  53. [61]

    Artificial intelligence-based effective detection of parkin- son’s disease using voice measurements

    Pradeep Reddy, G., Rohan, D., Kumar, Y .V .P., Prakash, K.P., Srikanth, M., 2024. Artificial intelligence-based effective detection of parkin- son’s disease using voice measurements. Engineering Proceedings 82. doi:10.3390/ecsa-11-20481

    2024 doi

  54. [62]

    Induction of decision trees

    Quinlan, J.R., 1986. Induction of decision trees. Machine learning 1, 81–106

    1986

  55. [63]

    A review of machine learning and deep learning for parkinson’s disease detection

    Rabie, H., Akhloufi, M.A., 2025. A review of machine learning and deep learning for parkinson’s disease detection. Discover Artificial Intelligence 5, 24. doi:10.1007/s44163-025-00241-9

    2025 doi

  56. [64]

    Proenc ¸a, J., Veiga, A., Candeias, S., Lemos, J., Janu´ario, C., Perdig ˜ao, F., 2014. Characterizing parkinson’s disease speech by acoustic and phonetic features, in: Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language: 11th International Conference, PROPOR 2014, S˜ao Carlos...

    2014

  57. [65]

    Parkinson’s Disease Classification

    Sakar, B.E., Isenkul, M.E., Sakar, C.O., Sertbas, A., Fikret Gurgen, S.D., Apaydin, H., Kursun, O., 2018. Parkinson’s Disease Classification. UCI Machine Learning Repository. Doi:https://doi.org/10.24432/C5MS4X

    2018 doi

  58. [66]

    Collection and analysis of a parkinson speech dataset with multiple types of sound recordings

    Sakar, B.E., Isenkul, M.E., Sakar, C.O., Sertbas, A., Gurgen, F., Delil, S., Apaydin, H., Kursun, O., 2013a. Collection and analysis of a parkinson speech dataset with multiple types of sound recordings. IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics 17, 828–834

  59. [67]

    Automatic speech-based assessment to discriminate parkinson’s disease from essential tremor with a cross-language approach

    Rios-Urrego, C.D., Rusz, J., Orozco-Arroyave, J.R., 2024. Automatic speech-based assessment to discriminate parkinson’s disease from essential tremor with a cross-language approach. npj Digital Medicine 7, 37

    2024

  60. [68]

    A comparative analysis of speech signal processing algorithms for parkinson’s disease classification and the use of the tunable q-factor wavelet transform

    Sakar, C.O., Serbes, G., Gunduz, A., Tunc, H.C., Nizam, H., Sakar, B.E., Tutuncu, M., Aydin, T., Isenkul, M.E., Apaydin, H., 2019. A comparative analysis of speech signal processing algorithms for parkinson’s disease classification and the use of the tunable q-factor wavelet t...

    2019

  61. [69]

    Robust and language-independent acoustic features in parkinson’s disease

    Scimeca, S., Amato, F., Olmo, G., Asci, F., Suppa, A., Costantini, G., Saggio, G., 2023. Robust and language-independent acoustic features in parkinson’s disease. Frontiers in Neurology 14, 1198058

    2023

  62. [70]

    Parkinson’s Speech with Multiple Types of Sound Recordings

    Sakar, B.E., Isenkul, M.E., Sakar, C.O., Sertbas, A., Gurgen, F., Delil, S., Apaydin, H., Kursun, O., 2013b. Parkinson’s Speech with Multiple Types of Sound Recordings. UCI Machine Learning Repository. doi:https://doi.org/10.24432/C5NC8M

    doi

  63. [71]

    Motor symptoms in parkinson’s disease

    Shahed, J., Jankovic, J., 2007. Motor symptoms in parkinson’s disease. Handbook of clinical neurology 83, 329–342

    2007

  64. [72]

    Explainable artificial intelligence to diagnose early parkinson’s disease via voice analysis

    Shen, M., Mortezaagha, P., Rahgozar, A., 2025. Explainable artificial intelligence to diagnose early parkinson’s disease via voice analysis. Scientific Reports 15, 11687

    2025

  65. [73]

    Formant-based articulatory strategies: Characterisation and inter-speaker variability analysis

    Serrurier, A., Neuschaefer-Rube, C., 2024. Formant-based articulatory strategies: Characterisation and inter-speaker variability analysis. Journal of Phonetics 107, 101374. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2024.101374

    2024

  66. [74]

    Parkinson’s disease handbook

    Standaert, D.G., Saint-Hilaire, M.H., Thomas, C.A., et al., 2015. Parkinson’s disease handbook. American Parkinson Disease Association, New York, USA

    2015

  67. [75]

    Towards early intervention: Detecting parkinson’s disease through voice analysis with machine learning

    Swain, K., Samal, S., Ravi, V ., Nayak, S.R., Alahmadi, T.J., Singh, P., Diwakar, M., 2024. Towards early intervention: Detecting parkinson’s disease through voice analysis with machine learning. The Open Biomedical Engineering Journal 18

    2024

  68. [76]

    Robust detection of parkinson’s disease using harvested smartphone voice data: A telemedicine approach

    Singh, S., Xu, W., 2020. Robust detection of parkinson’s disease using harvested smartphone voice data: A telemedicine approach. Telemedicine and e-Health 26, 327–334

    2020

  69. [77]

    Occupational therapy for parkinson’s disease.https://www.https://thefinancialexpress.com

    thefinancialexpress.com.bd, 2022. Occupational therapy for parkinson’s disease.https://www.https://thefinancialexpress.com. bd/views/letters/occupational-therapy-for-parkinsons-disease[Accessed: (15th August, 2024)]

    2022

  70. [78]

    Comparative study of speech analysis methods to predict parkinson’s disease

    Toye, A.A., Kompalli, S., 2021. Comparative study of speech analysis methods to predict parkinson’s disease. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.10207

    2021 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Noise Reduction

    Team, A., 2021. Noise Reduction. URL:https://manual.audacityteam.org/man/noise_reduction.html. accessed: 7 March 2025

    2021

  72. [80]

    Parkinsons Telemonitoring

    Tsanas, A., Little, M., 2009. Parkinsons Telemonitoring. UCI Machine Learning Repository. doi:https://doi.org/10.24432/C5ZS3N

    2009 doi

  73. [81]

    Nonlinear speech analysis algorithms mapped to a standard metric achieve clinically useful quantification of average parkinson’s disease symptom severity

    Tsanas, A., Little, M.A., McSharry, P.E., Ramig, L.O., 2011. Nonlinear speech analysis algorithms mapped to a standard metric achieve clinically useful quantification of average parkinson’s disease symptom severity. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 8, 842–855

    2011

  74. [82]

    Accurate telemonitoring of Parkinson’s disease symptom severity using nonlinear speech signal processing and statistical machine learning

    Tsanas, A., 2012. Accurate telemonitoring of Parkinson’s disease symptom severity using nonlinear speech signal processing and statistical machine learning. Ph.D. thesis. Oxford University, UK

    2012

  75. [83]

    V ´asquez-Correa, J.C., Arias-Vergara, T., Rios-Urrego, C.D., Schuster, M., Rusz, J., Orozco-Arroyave, J.R., N ¨oth, E., 2019. Convolutional neural networks and a transfer learning strategy to classify parkinson’s disease from speech in three different languages, in: Progress ...

    2019

  76. [84]

    Complexity measures of voice recordings as a discriminative tool for parkinson’s disease

    Viswanathan, R., Arjunan, S.P., Bingham, A., Jelfs, B., Kempster, P., Raghav, S., Kumar, D.K., 2019. Complexity measures of voice recordings as a discriminative tool for parkinson’s disease. Biosensors 10, 1

    2019

  77. [85]

    Discriminating parkinson diseased and healthy people using modified mfcc filter bank xlv approach

    Upadhya, S.S., Cheeran, A., Nirmal, J.H., 2019. Discriminating parkinson diseased and healthy people using modified mfcc filter bank xlv approach. International Journal of Speech Technology 22, 1021–1029

    2019

  78. [86]

    Early detection of parkinson’s disease from multiple signal speech: Based on mandarin language dataset

    Wang, Q., Fu, Y ., Shao, B., Chang, L., Ren, K., Chen, Z., Ling, Y ., 2022b. Early detection of parkinson’s disease from multiple signal speech: Based on mandarin language dataset. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 14, 1036588

  79. [87]

    Bangladesh parkinson disease statistics.https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/bangladesh- parkinson-disease[Accessed: (15th August, 2024)]

    worldlifeexpectancy.com, 2022. Bangladesh parkinson disease statistics.https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/bangladesh- parkinson-disease[Accessed: (15th August, 2024)]

    2022

  80. [88]

    Distinctive acoustic changes in speech in parkinson’s disease

    Wang, M., Wen, Y ., Mo, S., Yang, L., Chen, X., Luo, M., Yu, H., Xu, F., Zou, X., 2022a. Distinctive acoustic changes in speech in parkinson’s disease. Computer Speech & Language 75, 101384

  81. [89]

    The physical significance of acoustic parameters and its clinical significance of dysarthria in parkinson’s disease

    Yang, S., Wang, F., Yang, L., Xu, F., Luo, M., Chen, X., Feng, X., Zou, X., 2020. The physical significance of acoustic parameters and its clinical significance of dysarthria in parkinson’s disease. Scientific Reports 10, 11776

    2020

  82. [90]

    Optimizing parkinson’s disease prediction: A comparative analysis of data aggregation methods using multiple voice recordings via an automated artificial intelligence pipeline

    Yang, Z., Zhou, H., Srivastav, S., Shaffer, J.G., Abraham, K.E., Naandam, S.M., Kakraba, S., 2025. Optimizing parkinson’s disease prediction: A comparative analysis of data aggregation methods using multiple voice recordings via an automated artificial intelligence pipeline. D...

    2025

  83. [91]

    V oice analysis in parkinson’s disease-a systematic literature review

    Xavier, D., Felizardo, V ., Ferreira, B., Zacarias, H., Pourvahab, M., Souza-Pereira, L., Garcia, N.M., 2025. V oice analysis in parkinson’s disease-a systematic literature review. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine , 103109doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2025.103109

    2025

  84. [92]

    Artificial intelligence-enabled detection and assessment of parkinson’s disease using multimodal data: A survey

    Zhao, A., Liu, Y ., Yu, X., Xing, X., Zhou, H., 2025. Artificial intelligence-enabled detection and assessment of parkinson’s disease using multimodal data: A survey. Information Fusion , 103175doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103175. xlvi

    2025

  85. [94]

    Yaseen, M., 2021

    Younis Thanoun, M., T. Yaseen, M., 2021. A comparative study of parkinson disease diagnosis in machine learning, in: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY , USA. p. 23–28. doi:1...

    2021

  86. [2022]

    Computers, Materials and Continua 70, 2953–2969

    Enhancing parkinson’s disease diagnosis accuracy through speech signal algorithm modeling. Computers, Materials and Continua 70, 2953–2969

  87. [2024]

    Do acoustic characteristics of dysarthria in people with parkinson’s disease differ across languages? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 67, 2822–2841

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.