Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

MM-PRM: Enhancing Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with Scalable Step-Level Supervision

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2505.13427 v2 pith:KO66MGGX submitted 2025-05-19 cs.AI cs.CV

classification cs.AIcs.CV
keywords reasoningmultimodalmm-prmdatasupervisionenhancingmathematicalmm-k12
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive progress in vision-language understanding, they still struggle with complex multi-step reasoning, often producing logically inconsistent or partially correct solutions. A key limitation lies in the lack of fine-grained supervision over intermediate reasoning steps. To address this, we propose MM-PRM, a process reward model trained within a fully automated, scalable framework. We first build MM-Policy, a strong multimodal model trained on diverse mathematical reasoning data. Then, we construct MM-K12, a curated dataset of 10,000 multimodal math problems with verifiable answers, which serves as seed data. Leveraging a Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)-based pipeline, we generate over 700k step-level annotations without human labeling. The resulting PRM is used to score candidate reasoning paths in the Best-of-N inference setup and achieves significant improvements across both in-domain (MM-K12 test set) and out-of-domain (OlympiadBench, MathVista, etc.) benchmarks. Further analysis confirms the effectiveness of soft labels, smaller learning rates, and path diversity in optimizing PRM performance. MM-PRM demonstrates that process supervision is a powerful tool for enhancing the logical robustness of multimodal reasoning systems. We release all our codes and data at https://github.com/ModalMinds/MM-PRM.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. StructVRM: Aligning Multimodal Reasoning with Structured and Verifiable Reward Models

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A model-based verifier that grades sub-question-level correctness supplies fine-grained RL rewards, and training with it yields a VLM that tops several multimodal reasoning benchmarks, including the authors' new STEM-Bench.

  2. GM-PRM: A Generative Multimodal Process Reward Model for Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A generative multimodal process reward model that produces step-level critiques and corrections improves average math accuracy for six multimodal LLMs by 2.9 to 5.9 points under a refinement-based Best-of-N strategy.

  3. Advancing Multimodal Judge Models through a Capability-Oriented Benchmark and MCTS-Driven Data Generation

    cs.AI 2026-02 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A capability-oriented multimodal judge benchmark and MCTS-based preference-data generation improve judge models on some benchmarks, but the paper's SOTA claim is not supported by its own numbers.

  4. An Explainable Machine Learning Framework for Railway Predictive Maintenance using Data Streams from the Metro Operator of Portugal

    cs.AI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    The submitted document is internally inconsistent: the abstract describes railway predictive maintenance while the body presents an unrelated multimodal reward-model paper, leaving the reported fault-prediction result...

Pith tools