Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Single-photon detection enabled by negative differential conductivity in moir\'e superlattices

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a bilayer-graphene/hBN moiré device counts individual photons at 11.3 μm and 675 nm up to 25 K by exploiting negative differential conductance, which it attributes to negative differential velocity in a folded…

desk verdict A genuinely new NDC-based bistable photodetector with rich transport data, but the single-photon headline is not yet supported by the reported calibration. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.13637 v1 pith:Q2CH52HV submitted 2025-05-19 cond-mat.mes-hall physics.app-phphysics.optics

Krystian Nowakowski , Hitesh Agarwal , Sergey Slizovskiy , Robin Smeyers , Xueqiao Wang , Zhiren Zheng , Julien Barrier , David Barcons Ruiz
show 14 more authors
Geng Li Riccardo Bertini Matteo Ceccanti Iacopo Torre Bert Jorissen Antoine Reserbat-Plantey Kenji Watanabe Takashi Taniguchi Lucian Covaci Milorad V. Milošević Vladimir Fal'ko Pablo Jarillo-Herrero Roshan Krishna Kumar Frank H. L. Koppens
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallphysics.app-phphysics.optics
keywords single-photondetectionmoirésuperlatticenegativedifferentialconductancevelocitybilayergrapheneonhBNbistableswitchingmid-infraredphotodetectionnon-equilibriumelectronphases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports a single-photon detector built from a bilayer-graphene/hexagonal-boron-nitride moiré superlattice. At high bias the device enters a negative differential conductance regime, and with a series resistor this becomes a bistable switch that a photon can trigger. The authors demonstrate counting at 11.3 μm and 675 nm up to 25 K, with Poissonian click statistics for visible light. They argue the negative differential conductance comes from carriers accelerated into negative-velocity parts of the Brillouin zone, not from electric-field localization, because the critical voltage stays nearly constant as the miniband width is tuned with displacement field. A sympathetic reading is that this establishes a non-superconducting mechanism for single-photon detection in a wavelength and temperature range where existing detectors struggle.

What carries the argument

The central object is negative differential velocity (NDV), the Esaki-Tsu mechanism in a strongly coupled superlattice: a DC field accelerates carriers past a band inflection where the effective mass changes sign, so the drift velocity decreases with increasing field. Two ingredients make NDV observable here: a displacement-field-opened gap at the secondary Dirac point that blocks Schwinger/Zener breakdown, and a structurally determined stacking domain, inferred from spatial maps and contact-dependent transport, that isolates the lowest miniband. A 200 kOhm series resistor converts the resulting negative differential conductance into a bistable current-voltage loop; photons tip the bistable switch. A generalized two-dimensional kinetic Boltzmann equation on the tight-binding band structure supplies the calculated current-field curve and critical-current-versus-doping dependence.

What would settle it

Perform scanning tunnelling spectroscopy directly on the narrow photoactive strip identified in spatial maps: if no band gap appears at the secondary Dirac point, or if the strip moves with gate voltage or bias, the negative-velocity mechanism and the structural-domain explanation would be ruled out.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a single-photon click can be produced by a non-equilibrium electron phase in a moiré superlattice without superconductivity, and that the detection wavelength is set by the broad infrared absorption of bilayer graphene combined with a field-induced bistability. Concretely, the paper shows count rates that rise linearly with absorbed power (exponent x = 1), Poissonian switching statistics at 675 nm, and a power dependence qualitatively different from temperature-induced dark counts, which rules out laser heating as the cause of the light-driven clicks. It attributes the negative differential conductance to negative differential velocity in an isolated miniband: a rare stacking domain with a gap at the secondary Dirac point suppresses Schwinger pair creation, letting carriers accelerate into negative-velocity states. Band-structure calculations and a two-region circuit model reproduce the measured critical currents within an order of magnitude, and the mechanism is reported to persist to roughly 30 K.

Load-bearing premise

The whole interpretation rests on a localized, structurally determined domain whose rare stacking order opens a gap at the secondary Dirac point, allowing carriers to reach negative-velocity states; the stacking and the gap are inferred from transport maps and calculations, not directly measured.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mid-infrared single-photon counting at 11.3 μm becomes possible without superconducting nanowires or millikelvin cooling; the paper reports detection up to about 25 K and negative differential conductance up to about 30 K.
  • The same mechanism, tuned through miniband engineering and displacement fields, should transfer to other moiré and van der Waals superlattice systems; the paper reports bistabilities in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene as supporting evidence.
  • Reset rates above 38 kHz are limited by the measurement circuit, not the device, so dedicated electronics and fiber-coupling should push speed and efficiency beyond the demonstrated values.
  • Because the count rate grows exponentially with bias and linearly with power near threshold, detector efficiency and dark count rate can be traded against each other by choosing the operating point.
  • The near-constant critical voltage under displacement-field tuning separates the negative-velocity mechanism from electric-field localization, giving a practical design rule for future NDC-based detectors.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the negative-velocity interpretation is right, Bloch oscillations in a two-dimensional solid become a plausible next step: the same isolated-miniband condition that produces NDV is the condition for coherent acceleration across the Brillouin zone.
  • Because only a small, rare stacking domain appears to work, deterministic control of local twist or stacking order, or deliberate supermoiré patterning, could convert this proof-of-principle into a detector with a much larger active area.
  • The bias-dependent count-rate exponent suggests a tunable threshold detector: biased close to the critical current it registers single photons, while biased farther away it registers multi-photon events, which could be useful for photon-number-resolving applications.
  • The two-regime Arrhenius analysis of dark counts implies two distinct escape barriers; if those barriers also control photon-triggered switching, engineering the potential landscape of the bistable state may reduce noise more effectively than simply cooling further.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper reports high-bias transport in bilayer graphene aligned to hexagonal boron nitride, showing negative differential conductance (NDC) that is spatially localized within the device. The NDC is attributed to Esaki-Tsu negative differential velocity rather than electric-field localization, based on the displacement-field (bandwidth) dependence of the critical voltage. Using a series load resistor to engineer bistability near the critical current, the authors observe stochastic switching events whose rate increases under mid-infrared (11.3 μm) and visible (675 nm) illumination, with linear power dependence near the critical bias and Poissonian click statistics in the visible. The paper claims single-photon counting at these wavelengths up to 25 K. The switching mechanism is argued to involve a structurally determined stacking domain whose gap at the secondary Dirac point suppresses Schwinger/Zener transitions, allowing carriers to reach negative-velocity states.

Significance. If the single-photon claim were established, this would be a substantial advance: a non-superconducting, bistable-switching detector operating at 25 K and 11.3 μm would fill a genuine gap left by SNSPDs and SPADs, and the use of gate-tunable moiré band structure to engineer the bistability is conceptually new. The paper has real strengths independent of that headline: the observation and spatial localization of NDC in BLG/hBN, the in-situ test separating Esaki-Tsu NDV from sequential tunneling via the displacement-field dependence of V_C (Fig. 4A), the two-region model explaining the narrow NDC window, and a thorough supplementary set including self-gating corrections, heating diagnostics, RCWA absorption estimates, and kinetic-equation modeling that captures the filling-factor dependence of I_C.

major comments (4)
  1. [Main text, Figs. 2D and 3C–D; Supplementary Section 5] The evidence presented does not establish single-photon triggering. (i) The linear power dependence Γ ∝ P with x = 1 (Fig. 2D) is expected from any detector with a smooth response at sufficiently low power, and the reported fluxes are far above the single-photon level: at 675 nm and 0.1 nW the incident flux is about 3.4×10^8 photons/s, i.e. about 6×10^4 photons per reset interval at f_reset = 5.6 kHz, and even after the 2% absorption correction quoted in the Fig. 3B caption this leaves roughly 10^3 absorbed photons per reset interval; the mid-IR data at 4.8 nW with ~4% absorption are further still from the single-photon regime. Any detector with a smooth monotonic response will show Γ linear in P at such fluxes, so the x = 1 exponent cannot distinguish one-photon triggering from a linearized multi-photon, hot-electron, or local-bolometric response. (ii) Poissonian histograms with variance = mean (Fig. 3C,D) are the generic statistics of any rare, independent Bernoulli switching process counted in fixed time bins, independent of whether a click requires one, two, or many photons; they therefore have no discriminating power for the single-photon question. (iii) Supplementary Section 5 itself reports non-Poissonian statistics for the mid-IR, so the abstract's mid-IR claim rests only on the linear power dependence. The manuscript's own statements that the microscopic switching mechanism and the required gain or carrier multiplication are open questions (main text, 'Single-photon detection mechanism'; Supplementary Section 16) reinforce that the single-photon level is asserted, not demonstrated. To support the headline claim, the authors should provide an attenuation series extending to mean photon number per reset below unity together with an absolute detection-efficiency calibration, or a direct comparison against an independent single-photon detector, or they should substantially temper the claim in the title, abstract, and discussion.
  2. [Origin of NDC, Fig. 4C] The text states that experiment and calculation agree 'without any fitting parameters' and 'within an order of magnitude,' but the Fig. 4C caption says the experimental data were 'scaled by a factor 3,' and Supplementary Section 7 states that the kinetic-equation model yields IV characteristics only 'up to an unknown constant in the electric field strength.' With an explicit scale factor of 3 and an unknown field constant, the comparison is not parameter-free as claimed. The more robust point is the filling-factor dependence peaking near ν = +2, which does not depend on these constants; please present the comparison with both scalings stated explicitly, or remove the parameter-free wording.
  3. [Origin of NDC and Supplementary Section 8] The attribution of NDC to Esaki-Tsu negative differential velocity rests on the premise that the photoactive domain has a stacking configuration opening a gap at the secondary Dirac point large enough to suppress Schwinger/Zener transitions. This premise is inferred from spatial maps (Fig. 3A), local 4-probe NDR, and tight-binding calculations showing the gap appears 'for only a few stacking orders' (Supplementary Section 8), but the stacking order and the gap of the actual photoactive region are not directly measured. Because the NDV mechanism conclusion depends on this unverified premise, the main text should state plainly that it is inferred rather than measured, or support it with a direct local probe; the current wording ('Our analysis suggests...') is weaker than the strength of the evidence, and the referee agrees this is a genuine unresolved point rather than a mere stylistic one.
  4. [Figs. 2–3 captions and Supplementary Sections 19, 11] The quoted absorbed-power fractions are internally inconsistent: the Fig. 2D caption states absorbed power is calculated 'to be 4%,' the Fig. 3B caption states '2% at λ = 675 nm,' Supplementary Section 19 reports α ≈ 2% at 675 nm and ≈3% at 11.3 μm, and the Fig. S10 caption states '~4%.' Since the absolute absorbed photon flux is the central quantity for any single-photon calibration (and for the per-reset photon numbers invoked in the main text), these numbers must be reconciled and a single consistent set of values, with uncertainties, should be quoted.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Methods, click-counting scheme] The click threshold is defined as 0.02 V below the median of the differentiated waveform; please provide a robustness check showing that Γ is insensitive to this threshold choice over a reasonable range, since the threshold is a free parameter of the counting procedure.
  2. [Fig. 2E–F caption] The caption states that the doping level in (E) and (F) was 'slightly different' from that in (C); given the extremely steep dependence of Γ on bias, please clarify how comparisons across these panels are normed.
  3. [Abstract and Fig. 5] The abstract claims operation 'up to 25 K,' while the Fig. 5B text says detector performance is unchanged 'up to 20 K' and the Fig. 5A caption places NDC survival 'around 30 K'; please reconcile these numbers.
  4. [Fig. 2 caption] There is a typo: 'All measured were performed at 4 K except E' should read 'All measurements were performed at 4 K except E.'
  5. [Supplementary Section 13, Fig. 4B] In the two-region model, the fraction of the NDC region l2/(l1+l2) is a free parameter; please state the value used for the black curve in Fig. 4B and how it was chosen.
  6. [Fig. 4A and Supplementary Section 10] The threshold condition for electric-field localization is quoted as V_SL/a > W, but the proportionality constant between the measured critical voltage V_C and the bandwidth W used for the red dashed line in Fig. 4A is not stated; please give the assumed field distribution and constant so that the comparison is reproducible.
  7. [References 3 and 46] References 3 and 46 contain malformed titles and dates ('Nature Reviews Physics 2021 4:3 4, 194–208' and 'Sci Adv 5, eaay8897 (2024)'); these should be cleaned up before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the NDV-versus-localization test and the single-photon claim rest on independent measurements and externally anchored models, not on fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central mechanism test (Fig. 4A) compares a measured critical voltage VC, extracted from four-probe data, with the bandwidth W(D) obtained from tight-binding calculations. W(D) is not fitted to the NDC or photon-counting data; it is a parameter-free band-structure input whose assumptions do not include the Esaki-Tsu/NDV conclusion. The W(D) values are taken from ref. 41, which has overlapping authorship, but the same paper independently recomputes W(D) in Supplementary Section S8, so the load-bearing content does not reduce to the self-citation. The kinetic model of Supplementary Section S7 contains an unknown electric-field constant and the comparison in Fig. 4C uses a factor-3 scaling, but this is an underdetermination/calibration limitation, not a circular reduction of the conclusion into the input. The single-photon claim rests on the measured linear power dependence Γ ∝ P (x≈1) and on Poissonian click histograms; these are empirical signatures whose interpretation as single-photon switching may be debated, but they are not defined in terms of the conclusion and the Poissonian benchmark is an external criterion. The exclusion of laser-induced heating via the distinct temperature and power dependences (Figs. 2E/2F and Supplementary Section 16) is also independent evidence. The paper explicitly leaves the microscopic switching mechanism open, which is an acknowledgment of incomplete understanding rather than a circular derivation. Thus no step in the claimed derivation chain is equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The detection claim is empirical and does not require a new entity. Its interpretation relies on several model-dependent assumptions: computed band structure, inferred gapped stacking domain, single-band kinetic transport, two-region circuit model, hot-spot switching, and RCWA absorption normalization. These do not make the paper circular, but they cap how much independence the mechanism conclusion has.

free parameters (5)
  • Critical-current scaling factor = 3
    In Fig. 4C, experimental DBLGA critical currents are multiplied by 3 before comparison with the model, despite the text describing the agreement as parameter-free.
  • Unknown electric-field constant
    Supplementary Section 7 concludes the kinetic calculation yields IV curves 'up to an unknown constant in the electric field strength', so the field magnitude in the active region is not fixed.
  • Scattering rate and phonon parameters = sound velocity 20 km/s, cooling threshold model
    The collision integral in Supplementary Section 7 assumes a phonon bath with a sound velocity of about 20 km/s and a scattering-frequency model; the absolute current scale depends on these choices.
  • NDC region fraction in two-region model = varied; roughly 20% from spatial map
    Supplementary Section 13 varies the relative length of the NDC region to reproduce the narrow NDC feature in the combined IV characteristics.
  • Click threshold = 0.02 V below waveform median
    The Methods define a click as any point falling 0.02 V below the median of the differentiated waveform; this arbitrary threshold sets the count-rate scale.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Tight-binding model of BLG/hBN with Moon-Koshino parameters gives correct band widths and gaps for the studied devices.
    Supplementary Section 8 uses this model to compute W(D) for Fig. 4A and to infer the presence of a gap at the secondary Dirac point; W is not measured independently.
  • domain assumption The photoactive domain has a rare stacking configuration that opens a gap at the secondary Dirac point and suppresses Schwinger/Zener transitions.
    Main text 'Origin of NDC' and Supplementary Section 8.b invoke this gapped domain; the actual stacking in the active strip is not directly measured, only inferred from spatial maps and statistics.
  • domain assumption A single-band semiclassical Boltzmann equation with a phonon cooling collision term describes high-field transport in the NDC region.
    Supplementary Section 7 formulates this kinetic model; it explicitly omits Zener transitions, so it is valid only if the gap assumption is strong enough.
  • domain assumption The device can be modeled as an NDC region and a non-NDC region in series, each with a polynomial IV characteristic.
    Supplementary Section 13 uses this two-region model to explain the narrow measured NDC window; the region lengths and fractions are not directly measured.
  • domain assumption A photon creates a local hot spot that reduces the critical current and triggers the bistable switch.
    Main text 'Single-photon detection mechanism' presents this as interpretation and states the microscopic process remains an open question.
  • domain assumption RCWA absorption computed for a plain BLG stack approximates the absorption of the real BLG/hBN superlattice.
    Supplementary Section 19 states the exact superlattice absorption is nontrivial and out of scope; the reported absorbed powers use the plain-BLG approximation.
  • standard math Standard Esaki-Tsu transport and Bloch-oscillation semiclassical theory apply to the moiré minibands.
    Supplementary Section 6 derives the 1D and 2D drift-velocity formulas used to identify negative differential velocity; these are standard results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Single-photon detection enabled by negative differential conductivity in moir\'e superlattices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q2CH52HV

@misc{pith2026250513637,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Single-photon detection enabled by negative differential conductivity in moir\'e superlattices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q2CH52HV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.13637}
}
read the original abstract

Detecting individual light quanta is essential for quantum information, space exploration, advanced machine vision, and fundamental science. Here, we introduce a novel single photon detection mechanism using highly photosensitive non-equilibrium electron phases in moir\'e materials. Using tunable bands in bilayer graphene/hexagonal-boron nitride superlattices, we engineer negative differential conductance and a sensitive bistable state capable of detecting single photons. Operating in this regime, we demonstrate single-photon counting at mid-infrared (11.3 microns) and visible wavelengths (675 nanometres) and temperatures up to 25 K. This detector offers new prospects for broadband, high-temperature quantum technologies with CMOS compatibility and seamless integration into photonic integrated circuits (PICs). Our analysis suggests the mechanism underlying our device operation originates from negative differential velocity, and represents an important milestone in the field of high-bias transport in two-dimensional moir\'e quantum materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.13637 by the authors.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Spatial and statistical measurements of switching events using visible light. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Displacement field dependence of NDC and modelling negative velocity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Negative differential conductance in triangular molecular assemblies

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A triangular trimer of TBTAP molecules on Pb(111) shows negative differential conductance, current decreasing with increasing voltage, caused by Coulomb blockade and inter-molecular capacitive coupling and reproduced ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    V & Covaci, L

    Smeyers, R., Milošević, M. V & Covaci, L. Strong gate-tunability of flat bands in bilayer graphene due to moiré encapsulation between hBN monolayers. Nanoscale 15, 4561–4569 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    A., Cea, T., Brown, R., Walet, N

    Pantaleón, P. A., Cea, T., Brown, R., Walet, N. R. & Guinea, F. Narrow bands, electrostatic interactions and band topology in graphene stacks. 2d Mater 8, 44006 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Wang, L. et al. New Generation of Moiré Superlattices in Doubly Aligned hBN/Graphene/hBN Heterostructures. Nano Lett 19, 2371–2376 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Wang, Z. et al. Composite super-moiré lattices in double-aligned graphene heterostructures. Sci Adv 5, eaay8897 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Halbertal, D. et al. Moiré metrology of energy landscapes in van der Waals heterostructures. Nat Commun 12, 242 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Hesp, N. C. H. et al. Nano-imaging photoresponse in a moiré unit cell of minimally twisted bilayer graphene. Nat Commun 12, 1640 (2021)

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Sunku, S. S. et al. Hyperbolic enhancement of photocurrent patterns in minimally twisted bilayer graphene. Nat Commun 12, 1641 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Wu, Y. et al. Three-terminal graphene negative differential resistance devices. ACS Nano 6, 2610–2616 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    M., Alden, J

    Xu, X., Gabor, N. M., Alden, J. S., Van Der Zande, A. M. & McEuen, P. L. Photo-thermoelectric effect at a graphene interface junction. Nano Lett 10, 562–566 (2010)

    2010

  2. [10]

    Chang, J. et al. Efficient mid-infrared single-photon detection using superconducting NbTiN nanowires with high time resolution in a Gifford-McMahon cryocooler. Photonics Res 10, 1063 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Wang, Y. et al. Mid-infrared single-pixel imaging at the single-photon level. Nat Commun 14, 1073 (2023)

    2023

  4. [12]

    Semiclassical Transport in Semiconductor Superlattices with Boundaries

    Rieder, B. Semiclassical Transport in Semiconductor Superlattices with Boundaries. PhD thesis, (2004)

    2004

  5. [13]

    & Esaki, L

    Tsu, R. & Esaki, L. Superlattice and Negative Differential Conductivity in Semiconductor. IBM J Res Dev 14, 61–65 (1970)

    1970

  6. [14]

    & Mermin, N

    Ashcroft, N. & Mermin, N. Solid State Physics. (Holt-Saunders, 1976)

    1976

  7. [15]

    Über die Quantenmechanik der Elektronen in Kristallgittern

    Bloch, F. Über die Quantenmechanik der Elektronen in Kristallgittern. Zeitschrift für Physik 52, 555–600 (1929)

    1929

  8. [16]

    A theory of the electrical breakdown of solid dielectrics

    Zener, C. A theory of the electrical breakdown of solid dielectrics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 145, 523–529 (1934)

    1934

  9. [17]

    Slater, J. C. & Koster, G. F. Simplified LCAO method for the periodic potential problem. Physical Review 94, 1498–1524 (1954)

    1954

  10. [18]

    & Koshino, M

    Moon, P. & Koshino, M. Electronic properties of graphene/hexagonal-boron-nitride moiré superlattice. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 90, 1–12 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    & Peeters, F

    Moldovan, D., Andelkovic, M. & Peeters, F. M. Pybinding V0.9.5: A python package For tight- binding calculations. https://zenodo.org/record/4010216. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4010216

  12. [20]

    F., Wang, H

    Sibille, A., Palmier, J. F., Wang, H. & Mollot, F. Observation of Esaki-Tsu negative differential velocity in GaAs/AlAs superlattices. Phys Rev Lett 64, 52–55 (1990)

    1990

  13. [21]

    Berdyugin, A. I. et al. Out-of-equilibrium criticalities in graphene superlattices. Science (1979) 375, 430–433 (2022)

    1979

  14. [22]

    Semenov, A. D. Superconducting nanostrip single-photon detectors some fundamental aspects in detection mechanism, technology and performance. Supercond Sci Technol 34, (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Walsh, E. D. et al. Josephson junction infrared single-photon detector. Science (1979) 372, 409–412 (2021)

    1979

  16. [24]

    M., Devoret, M

    Martinis, J. M., Devoret, M. H. & Clarke, J. Experimental tests for the quantum behavior of a macroscopic degree of freedom: The phase difference across a Josephson junction. Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys 35, 4682–4698 (1987)

    1987

  17. [25]

    & Bachtold, A

    Barreiro, A., Lazzeri, M., Moser, J., Mauri, F. & Bachtold, A. Transport properties of graphene in the high-current limit. Phys Rev Lett 103, 2–5 (2009)

    2009

  18. [26]

    Cao, Y. et al. Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices. Nature 556, 80–84 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    Nair, R. R. et al. Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene. doi:10.1126/science.1156965

    doi

  20. [28]

    & Kim, S

    Heo, H., Lee, S. & Kim, S. Broadband absorption enhancement of monolayer graphene by prism coupling in the visible range. Carbon N Y 154, 42–47 (2019)

    2019

  21. [29]

    Agarwal, H. et al. Ultra-broadband photoconductivity in twisted graphene heterostructures with large responsivity. 17, (2023)

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.