Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Camera Trajectory Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods, Metrics, and Future Directions

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This survey claims to be the first unified reference for camera trajectory generation, organizing roughly two decades of representations, algorithms, evaluation metrics, and datasets into a single taxonomy, and it argues that the field's…

desk verdict Useful survey of camera trajectory generation with a solid taxonomy, but the 'first comprehensive' claim is unsupported and needs revision before the paper can serve as a definitive reference. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00974 v1 pith:I7JZZST7 submitted 2025-06-01 cs.CV cs.MM

Zahra Dehghanian , Pouya Ardekhani , Amir Vahedi , Hamid Beigy , Hamid R. Rabiee This is my paper
classification cs.CVcs.MM
keywords cameratrajectorygenerationautomaticcontrolvirtualcinematographyrepresentationalgorithmsevaluationmetricsdatasetsdiffusionmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to establish a single organized reference for camera trajectory generation — the task of computing how a camera moves through a 3D scene — a field the authors argue has grown for twenty years without a systematic survey. It claims this is the first comprehensive review, arranging prior work along three axes: camera representation at three levels of abstraction, algorithms in four families (rule-based, optimization, machine learning, and hybrid), and the metrics and datasets used to evaluate them. A sympathetic reader would care because the field spans computer graphics, robotics, virtual reality, and cinematography, and a unified vocabulary plus a map of open gaps could direct newcomers and future research. The paper concludes that machine learning, especially diffusion-based generative models, is the most active direction, while dataset diversity, dynamic environments, and aesthetic objectives remain the least resolved problems.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the survey's own taxonomy rather than a single theorem. The first organizing device is the three-level abstraction hierarchy for camera representations — natural language, formal shot-annotation languages, and mathematical parameterizations — which frames a trade-off between usability and precision. The second is the four-family algorithm classification (rule-based, optimization, machine learning, hybrid), which structures the review of methods and the summary tables. A third, less visible mechanism is the literature-search protocol (IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and SpringerLink with the keywords 'camera trajectory generation,' 'automatic camera control,' and 'virtual cinematography'), which is what the paper offers to justify the claim of comprehensiveness.

What would settle it

A reader could settle the central claim by running a systematic search with explicit dates and criteria across a broader set of databases (for example Scopus, Web of Science, or DBLP) using the same keywords plus variants, and checking whether the uncovered methods fit the four-family taxonomy; finding a substantial body of published work outside those families, or a prior survey that already consolidated the field, would refute the 'first comprehensive review' claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that camera trajectory generation can and should be understood as one coherent field, and that its literature organizes cleanly into a three-level representation hierarchy and a four-family method taxonomy. Representations run from high-level natural language (for example ChatCam and CameraCtrl), through mid-level formal shot-annotation languages such as the Prose Storyboard Language, down to low-level mathematical models including the 7-DOF camera, Toric space, drone Toric space, and Plücker coordinates, with an inherent trade-off between expressive ease of use and precise parameter retrieval. Algorithms are grouped as rule-based systems rooted in cinematographic idioms, optimization methods that minimize cost functions over camera parameters (dominant in drone cinematography), machine learning approaches that have progressed from recurrent networks to transformers and diffusion models, and hybrid combinations of these. The survey further claims that evaluation is fragmented — many specialized quantitative metrics exist but no general-purpose trajectory metric — and that datasets remain scarce, biased, and mostly synthetic or narrow in domain. On its own terms the discovery is the map: the field's history, current state, and unresolved gaps presented in one place for the first time.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's claim to be the first comprehensive review rests on the assumption that its literature search — three databases queried with three keywords, with no stated search date, no inclusion or exclusion criteria, and no comparison against prior surveys — actually captured the field; if relevant work is missing, the taxonomy and the 'comprehensive' status both weaken.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Anyone entering virtual cinematography gains a single entry point: the representation hierarchy tells designers what abstraction level to work at, and the four-family taxonomy situates any new method against two decades of prior work.
  • If the survey's reading of the trend is right, future systems will increasingly generate trajectories with machine learning — diffusion models conditioned on text, keyframes, and reference motions — rather than with hand-coded cinematic rules.
  • The metrics analysis implies the field will keep producing specialized quantitative measures until a general-purpose trajectory quality metric exists, since no current metric evaluates all aspects of a trajectory at once.
  • The dataset survey implies that data is the binding constraint: existing resources are either synthetic with a domain gap or narrow in scope, so larger and more diverse trajectory datasets are a precondition for the next generation of learned methods.
  • Because optimization-based drone cinematography already satisfies real-time physical constraints, that subfamily is positioned to keep dominating real-world deployments while learning-based methods mature.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: the paper's own summary tables already encode method, setting (real or virtual), and camera movement type for every entry, so they could be turned into a living benchmark by adding reported performance numbers — the field's first comparative leaderboard.
  • The representation trade-off points to a research program the paper leaves implicit: pairing modern large language models with mid-level formal languages such as the Prose Storyboard Language could give users natural-language control while keeping the grammar needed for reliable parameter retrieval.
  • The evaluation gap suggests that the field may converge on learned trajectory-text embeddings like the CLaTr scoring the paper reviews, because such embeddings can measure semantic alignment without requiring ground-truth camera parameters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript surveys camera trajectory generation, organizing the field into three abstraction levels of representation (high-level natural language, mid-level shot annotation, low-level mathematical), two specialized movement systems (PTZ and gimbal-mounted), four algorithm families (rule-based, optimization, machine learning, hybrid), and separate sections on evaluation metrics and datasets. The authors claim in the Abstract and Section 1 that this is the first comprehensive review of the field, covering roughly the past 20 years and unifying foundational definitions, state-of-the-art techniques, metrics, datasets, and open challenges.

Significance. If the comprehensiveness claim were substantiated, this survey could serve as a valuable unified reference for a community spanning computer graphics, vision, robotics, and human-computer interaction. The paper has clear strengths: a sensible high-level organization, useful summary tables (Tables 1–4 and 7) that allow quick comparison of methods and datasets, coverage of recent diffusion-based trajectory methods (e.g., the CCD dataset and E.T. work), and an explicit section on limitations and future directions. The main weakness is that the central claim of being 'the first comprehensive review' is asserted rather than demonstrated: the search protocol in Section 1 is too vague to reproduce, and the paper's own bibliography contains prior surveys covering substantial parts of the same territory. Because this claim is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, the manuscript currently falls short of its stated goal.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The central claim of being the 'first comprehensive review' is not supported by the methodology described. Section 1 states only that IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and SpringerLink were searched with three keywords, with no search date, no inclusion/exclusion criteria, and no reporting of the number of papers retrieved or screened. Meanwhile, the reference list itself cites prior surveys that already review substantial parts of this field: Chen and Carr (2014) 'Autonomous camera systems: A survey,' Christie et al. (2008) 'Camera Control in Computer Graphics,' Burelli (2016) 'Game Cinematography,' and Azzarelli et al. (2024) 'Reviewing Intelligent Cinematography.' The manuscript should add a reproducible search-protocol description (databases, dates, query strings, screening steps, counts) and place itself explicitly in relation to those prior surveys, explaining what is new and what is consolidated. Without this, the 'comprehensive' and 'first' assertions are untestable and likely false.
  2. [§4.3 and Table 3] LensCraft [Dehghanian et al. 2025] is described in Section 4.3 as an 'upcoming study' and is included in Table 3 alongside published methods with specific quantitative metrics (FID, Clip-score, P, R, C, D) and a dataset entry. This is the authors' own work and is not peer-reviewed or, as far as the manuscript shows, publicly available in a citable form. A survey should either exclude such unpublished work from its central tables and comparisons or clearly mark it as a self-citation of work under review, with an available preprint and a note that the stated metrics are author-reported. The current presentation gives this entry the same evidentiary weight as established publications, which undermines the objectivity of the machine-learning overview.
  3. [§4.4 and §6] The survey's scope blurs camera trajectory generation with camera trajectory estimation and forecasting. Section 4.4 includes works such as SLAHMR [Ye et al. 2023] and the NeRF-based pose estimation approach [Jiang et al. 2024a], which reconstruct or estimate camera trajectories from video rather than designing new trajectories for cinematographic purposes. Table 3 also lists trajectory-forecasting methods such as Styles et al. (2021) and navigation-frame prediction [Bar et al. 2024]. If the paper intentionally covers estimation and forecasting, the introduction should define this expanded scope; if not, these entries should be moved to a separate 'related but out of scope' discussion. As written, the inclusion of these methods weakens the organizational consistency and makes the claimed comprehensiveness harder to evaluate.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] The placeholder citation '[Chr [n. d.]]' appears in place of proper author-year citations in several locations (e.g., §2.3, §2.3.1, §4.2.1, §4.2.2). These should be resolved to the corresponding reference entries (presumably Christie et al. 2008) before submission.
  2. [§1] The sentence 'By analyzing research from the past 20 years' is unspecific: the survey also includes works from before 2005 (e.g., Kamada and Kawai 1988). Either state the actual time window used in the search or revise this phrase.
  3. [§2.3.2] The subsection titled 'Spherical Surface' begins with a fragmented paragraph and ends with a discussion of 'drone-specific spaces' that has not yet been introduced. This subsection should be rewritten to present the spherical-surface model coherently and to point forward to the later drone subsection.
  4. [§5.1.15] In the FVD subsection, the text reads 'Let P_g and P_g denote the distributions of real and generated videos'; the first distribution should be P_r. Also, the FVD formula in Table 5 is written identically to the FID formula except for the name; the authors should clarify whether the only difference is the feature extractor.
  5. [§5.1.19] The drone-specific metrics list includes 'Ping' as a metric without a definition or citation. Either define it (e.g., round-trip communication latency) and cite a source, or remove it from the list.
  6. [Table 2 and Table 6] Table 2 contains the typo 'Areal-Based' (should be 'Aerial-Based') in several rows, and Table 6 lists '[Burelli and GN 2015]' with an abbreviated author field that should be expanded to '[Burelli and Yannakakis 2015]' to match the reference list.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No central circularity: the survey's content is independently compiled, but Section 4.3 includes a minor self-citation of the authors' own upcoming LensCraft work without disclosure of author overlap.

  1. other [Section 4.3 (Machine Learning), Table 3]
    "In an upcoming study, LensCraft [Dehghanian et al. 2025] tries to solve three critical challenges in virtual cinematography. First, it introduces a comprehensive cinematographic language paired with a dedicated simulation framework to generate balanced, high-quality, controlled training data through expert consultation - addressing the persistent issue of dataset bias and quality in existing systems."

    The survey's central claim is comprehensiveness, and it lists LensCraft as an established machine-learning method in Table 3 with metrics and a dataset. LensCraft is cited as [Dehghanian et al. 2025], an 'upcoming study' by three of the present authors, and is included without external evaluation or disclosure of author overlap. The survey thus uses the authors' own unpublished claims as evidence for the method's existence and capabilities, weakly supporting the coverage assertion from within the authors' own work. This is a minor self-citation burden, not a load-bearing one: the taxonomy and the substantive survey content do not reduce to LensCraft, so the paper's central derivation remains independent.

full rationale

The paper is a literature survey, not a derivation, so the compositional circularity patterns (self-definitional equations, fitted-input-called-prediction, uniqueness imported from authors, ansatz smuggled via citation) are largely inapplicable. Its central claim, 'the first comprehensive review,' is an assertion about literature coverage and is not derived from the surveyed equations or taxonomies, so it cannot be circular by construction. The one concrete circularity concern is Section 4.3's treatment of LensCraft: it is an 'upcoming study' by Dehghanian, Beigy, and Rabiee, yet it appears in the survey body and Table 3 as a validated ML method, with no disclosure of author overlap and no external benchmark. That is a single self-citation that does not carry the survey's taxonomy or conclusions, so it scores 2. The undated search protocol and the existence of prior surveys cited in the paper's own bibliography (Chen and Carr 2014; Christie et al. 2008; Burelli 2016; Azzarelli et al. 2024) are completeness and correctness risks for the 'first comprehensive' claim, but they are not circular reasoning under the definitions used here.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no free parameters or new entities; its only input is the prior literature. The load-bearing assumptions are methodological: the search and classification are sufficient for comprehensiveness, the taxonomy is complete, and the reproduced formulas are faithful.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Literature search via IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, and SpringerLink with the stated keywords captures all relevant work in camera trajectory generation.
    Section 1 describes the search but gives no dates, inclusion/exclusion criteria, or quality filter; the survey's comprehensiveness claim rests on this.
  • domain assumption The survey's taxonomy, high/mid/low representations and rule/optimization/ML/hybrid algorithms, is an exhaustive and faithful categorization of the field.
    Sections 2 and 4 impose this structure; if important method families or representation schemes fall outside it, the 'comprehensive' claim weakens.
  • standard math Standard mathematical tools, such as quaternions, Bézier curves, dynamic programming, and Gaussian distributions, are used correctly as background.
    These tools are invoked throughout Sections 2, 4, and 5 and are not proved in the survey.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Camera Trajectory Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods, Metrics, and Future Directions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I7JZZST7

@misc{pith2026250600974,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Camera Trajectory Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods, Metrics, and Future Directions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I7JZZST7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00974}
}
read the original abstract

Camera trajectory generation is a cornerstone in computer graphics, robotics, virtual reality, and cinematography, enabling seamless and adaptive camera movements that enhance visual storytelling and immersive experiences. Despite its growing prominence, the field lacks a systematic and unified survey that consolidates essential knowledge and advancements in this domain. This paper addresses this gap by providing the first comprehensive review of the field, covering from foundational definitions to advanced methodologies. We introduce the different approaches to camera representation and present an in-depth review of available camera trajectory generation models, starting with rule-based approaches and progressing through optimization-based techniques, machine learning advancements, and hybrid methods that integrate multiple strategies. Additionally, we gather and analyze the metrics and datasets commonly used for evaluating camera trajectory systems, offering insights into how these tools measure performance, aesthetic quality, and practical applicability. Finally, we highlight existing limitations, critical gaps in current research, and promising opportunities for investment and innovation in the field. This paper not only serves as a foundational resource for researchers entering the field but also paves the way for advancing adaptive, efficient, and creative camera trajectory systems across diverse applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.00974 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Tree representation of the PSL grammar [Ronfard et al. 2015]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Prose storyboard language description of two iconic shots in Alfred Hitchcock’s North By Northwest [Ronfard et al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A simple camera model based on Euler angles; tilt ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (27 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spherical surface used to model a camera for single-target configurations, showing the character’s vantage angles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Representation of the Toric space. The manifold is parametrized by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Drone configuration in the DTS model, showcasing its 7D parameterization [Galvane et al. 2018]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Drone Toric Space parameterization, highlighting regions for camera positioning and framing [Galvane et al. 2018]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Conversion process for Plücker coordinates [Zhang et al. 2024b]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Camera motion of fixed PTZ Cameras [Bak and Park 2023]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Camera motion of non-fixed PTZ Cameras [Bak and Park 2023]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Overview of yaw-pitch gimbal [Cong Danh 2021]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Pitch angle limit [Cong Danh 2021]. user immersion, and visual coherence. Advances in rule-based, optimization, and learning-based methods have expanded the capabilities of camera systems, enabling creative and adaptable trajectory generation [Wang et al. 2024a,b]. Th…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The hand-held virtual camera device with custom-built dual handgrip rig and button controls, a 7-inch LCD touch [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: PLRS for two entities A (in green) and B (in blue) [Louarn et al. 2018]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The framework of imitation filming [Huang et al. 2019] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The model presented in the article [Jiang et al. 2020] for transferring cinematic features from a reference video. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: The architecture of the model [Jiang et al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: A two stage transformer based architecture proposed in [Xie et al. 2023a] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: The architecture proposed in [Jiang et al. 2024b], utilizing diffusion-based models with a transformer architecture. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Architectures proposed in [Courant et al. 2025] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: The DCM model architecture, based on a combination of transformer and diffusion networks [Wang et al. 2024a]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: The architecture proposed in [Wang et al. 2024b] for modeling keyframes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: The convex hull formed by the player locations and merging points (red lines) indicates the field of view determined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Overview of ACT system for cinematography [Huang et al. 2018]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_24.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Imitation learning framework featuring three key modules [Huang et al. 2019]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_25.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Overall System Flow of [Gschwindt et al. 2019]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_26.png]
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Overview of JAWS pipeline [Wang et al. 2023a]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_27.png]
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: SLAHMR Framework [Ye et al. 2023]. The approach in [Jiang et al. 2024a] tackles the challenges of estimating camera trajectories and character motion in complex dynamic scenes, particularly where traditional methods like SLAM [Durrant-Whyte and Bailey 2006] struggle w…
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: Overview of the approach in [Jiang et al. 2024a]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_29.png]
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: Main framework of [Hu et al. 2024] method [Hu et al. 2024]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_30.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CinemaTraj: Composing Atomic Camera Trajectories for 3D Scenes with LLM Agents

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM agent grounded in a 3D scene graph composes parametric cinematic camera moves and SDF-optimizes them into prompt-faithful, collision-free trajectories on ScanNet++.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

132 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Blain Brown

    3–8. Blain Brown. 2012.Cinematography: Theory and Practice(2nd ed.). Elsevier, MA, USA. Alexandre Bruckert, Marc Christie, and Olivier Le Meur

    2012

  2. [7]

    Max Bain, Arsha Nagrani, Andrew Brown, and Andrew Zisserman

    Uniedit: A unified tuning-free framework for video motion and appearance editing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.13185(2024). Max Bain, Arsha Nagrani, Andrew Brown, and Andrew Zisserman

    arXiv 2024

  3. [9]

    arXiv:2412.03572 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.03572 William Bares, Scott McDermott, Christina Boudreaux, and Somying Thainimit

    Navigation World Models. arXiv:2412.03572 [cs.CV] https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.03572 William Bares, Scott McDermott, Christina Boudreaux, and Somying Thainimit

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Matthias Bernhard, Efstathios Stavrakis, and Michael Wimmer

    Gradient-based optimization of hyperparameters.Neural computation12, 8 (2000), 1889–1900. Matthias Bernhard, Efstathios Stavrakis, and Michael Wimmer

    2000

  5. [14]

    Åke Björck

    A random forest guided tour.Test25 (2016), 197–227. Åke Björck

    2016

  6. [16]

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s41074-017-0027-2 Yogya Tewari, Arti Hadap, Payal Soni, Muskan Sharma, Daksh Shukla, and Shreya Malanker

    doi:10.1186/s41074-017-0027-2

  7. [19]

    James D Foley

    Wiley Online Library, 101–110. James D Foley. 1996.Computer graphics: principles and practice. Vol. 12110. Addison-Wesley Professional. Quentin Galvane, Marc Christie, Chrsitophe Lino, and Rémi Ronfard. 2015a. Camera-on-rails: automated computation of constrained camera paths. InProceedings of the 8th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Motion in Games(Paris, Fran...

    arXiv 1996

  8. [20]

    Dominique Brunet, Edward R Vrscay, and Zhou Wang

    Where to look at the movies: Analyzing visual attention to understand movie editing.Behavior Research Methods55, 6 (2023), 2940–2959. Dominique Brunet, Edward R Vrscay, and Zhou Wang

    2023

Show all 132 references
  1. [22]

    InEmotion in Games: Theory and Praxis, Kostas Karpouzis and Georgios N

    Game Cinematography: From Camera Control to Player Emotions. InEmotion in Games: Theory and Praxis, Kostas Karpouzis and Georgios N. Yannakakis (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41316-7_11 P Burelli and Yannakakis GN

    doi

  2. [24]

    InSmart Graphics: 11th International Symposium, SG 2011, Bremen, Germany, July 18-20,

    Towards adaptive virtual camera control in computer games. InSmart Graphics: 11th International Symposium, SG 2011, Bremen, Germany, July 18-20,

    2011

  3. [25]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-015-9156-4 Ludovic Burg

    Adapting virtual camera behaviour through player modelling.User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction25, 2 (2015), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11257-015-9156-4 Ludovic Burg

    2015 doi

  4. [26]

    InGI 2021-Graphics Interface conference

    Real-Time Cinematic Tracking of Targets in Dynamic Environments. InGI 2021-Graphics Interface conference. 1–10. Zhe Cao, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei, and Yaser Sheikh

    2021

  5. [27]

    In2015 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision

    Mimicking human camera operators. In2015 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision. IEEE, 215–222. Jianhui Chen, Hoang M Le, Peter Carr, Yisong Yue, and James J Little. 2016a. Learning online smooth predictors for realtime camera planning using recurrent decisi...

    2024 arXiv

  6. [30]

    Robin Courant, Nicolas Dufour, Xi Wang, Marc Christie, and Vicky Kalogeiton

    The Stability of a Two-Axis Gimbal System for the Camera.The Scientific World Journal2021, 1 (2021), 9958848. Robin Courant, Nicolas Dufour, Xi Wang, Marc Christie, and Vicky Kalogeiton

    2021

  7. [32]

    https://doi.org/10.3390/mca28050100 Paul E Debevec, Camillo J Taylor, and Jitendra Malik

    On Generalized Dominance Structures for Multi-Objective Optimization.Mathematical and Computational Applications28, 5 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/mca28050100 Paul E Debevec, Camillo J Taylor, and Jitendra Malik

    2023 doi

  8. [33]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239 Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans

    6840–6851. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.11239 Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans

    2006 arXiv

  9. [34]

    https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818013 Amaury Louarn, Marc Christie, and Fabrice Lamarche

    Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818013 Amaury Louarn, Marc Christie, and Fabrice Lamarche

  10. [35]

    Hugh Durrant-Whyte and Tim Bailey

    The llama 3 herd of models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783(2024). Hugh Durrant-Whyte and Tim Bailey

    2024 arXiv

  11. [37]

    David Elson and Mark Riedl

    Degrees of Freedom.Teaching Statistics30, 3 (2008). David Elson and Mark Riedl

    2008

  12. [38]

    Cass Everitt

    Development and evaluation of an autonomous camera control algorithm on the da Vinci Surgical System.The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery16, 2 (2020), e2036. Cass Everitt

    2020

  13. [40]

    Giovanni Fiengo, Diego Castiello, Giuseppe Grande, and Marco Solla

    Hardware shadow mapping.White paper, nVIDIA2 (2001). Giovanni Fiengo, Diego Castiello, Giuseppe Grande, and Marco Solla

    2001

  14. [42]

    Quentin Galvane, Rémi Ronfard, Marc Christie, and Nicolas Szilas

    Directing cinematographic drones.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)37, 3 (2018), 1–18. Quentin Galvane, Rémi Ronfard, Marc Christie, and Nicolas Szilas

    2018

  15. [43]

    InProceedings of the 2016 chi conference on human factors in computing systems

    Airways: Optimization-based planning of quadrotor trajectories according to high-level user goals. InProceedings of the 2016 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 2508–2519. Christoph Gebhardt and Otmar Hilliges

    2016

  16. [44]

    In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Optimization-based user support for cinematographic quadrotor camera target framing. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13. Christoph Gebhardt, Stefan Stevšić, and Otmar Hilliges

    2021

  17. [45]

    Jacek Gondzio

    Optimizing for aesthetically pleasing quadrotor camera motion.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)37, 4 (2018), 1–11. Jacek Gondzio

    2018

  18. [47]

    Michael D Grossberg and Shree K Nayar

    Generative adversarial nets.Advances in neural information processing systems27 (2014). Michael D Grossberg and Shree K Nayar

    2014

  19. [48]

    InProceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision

    A general imaging model and a method for finding its parameters. InProceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001, Vol

    2001

  20. [49]

    Nicolas Halper, Ralf Helbing, and Thomas Strothotte

    Animatediff: Animate your personalized text-to-image diffusion models without specific tuning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04725(2023). Nicolas Halper, Ralf Helbing, and Thomas Strothotte

    2023 arXiv

  21. [50]

    Richard Hartley and Andrew Zisserman

    Wiley Online Library, 174–183. Richard Hartley and Andrew Zisserman. 2003.Multiple view geometry in computer vision. Cambridge university press. Hao He, Yinghao Xu, Yuwei Guo, Gordon Wetzstein, Bo Dai, Hongsheng Li, and Ceyuan Yang

    2003

  22. [51]

    Cameractrl: Enabling camera control for text-to-video generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02101(2024). , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September

    2024 arXiv

  23. [52]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13221 Richard M Heiberger, Erich Neuwirth, Richard M Heiberger, and Erich Neuwirth

    Latent Video Diffusion Models for High-Fidelity Long Video Generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.13221(2022). https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.13221 Richard M Heiberger, Erich Neuwirth, Richard M Heiberger, and Erich Neuwirth

    2022 arXiv

  24. [53]

    Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter

    Polynomial regression.R Through Excel: A Spreadsheet Interface for Statistics, Data Analysis, and Graphics(2009), 269–284. Martin Heusel, Hubert Ramsauer, Thomas Unterthiner, Bernhard Nessler, and Sepp Hochreiter

    2009

  25. [56]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2207

    Classifier-Free Diffusion Guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598(2022). https://arxiv.org/abs/2207. 12598 Holger H Hoos and Thomas St¥𝜈tzle

    2022 arXiv

  26. [57]

    Teng Hu, Jiangning Zhang, Ran Yi, Yating Wang, Hongrui Huang, Jieyu Weng, Yabiao Wang, and Lizhuang Ma

    Training-free Camera Control for Video Generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.10126 (2024). Teng Hu, Jiangning Zhang, Ran Yi, Yating Wang, Hongrui Huang, Jieyu Weng, Yabiao Wang, and Lizhuang Ma

    2024 arXiv

  27. [58]

    Chong Huang, Fei Gao, Jie Pan, Zhenyu Yang, Weihao Qiu, Peng Chen, Xin Yang, Shaojie Shen, and Kwang-Ting Cheng

    MotionMaster: Training-free Camera Motion Transfer For Video Generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15789(2024). Chong Huang, Fei Gao, Jie Pan, Zhenyu Yang, Weihao Qiu, Peng Chen, Xin Yang, Shaojie Shen, and Kwang-Ting Cheng

    2024 arXiv

  28. [59]

    Luay Jawad, Arshdeep Singh-Chudda, Abhishek Shankar, and Abhilash Pandya

    Gpt-4o system card.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.21276(2024). Luay Jawad, Arshdeep Singh-Chudda, Abhishek Shankar, and Abhilash Pandya

    2024 arXiv

  29. [60]

    A Deep Learning Approach to Merge Rule-Based and Human-Operated Camera Control for Teleoperated Robotic Systems.Robotics13, 3 (2024),

    2024

  30. [61]

    In 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Online trajectory generation of a mav for chasing a moving target in 3d dense environments. In 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 1115–1121. Boseong Felipe Jeon, Dongsuk Shim, and H Jin Kim

    2019

  31. [62]

    Hongda Jiang, Bin Wang, Xi Wang, Marc Christie, and Baoquan Chen

    Camera keyframing with style and control.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)40, 6 (2021), 1–13. Hongda Jiang, Bin Wang, Xi Wang, Marc Christie, and Baoquan Chen

    2021

  32. [63]

    Graph.39, 4 (2020),

    Example-driven virtual cinematography by learning camera behaviors.ACM Trans. Graph.39, 4 (2020),

    2020

  33. [64]

    Rohan Katoch and Jun Ueda

    A simple method for computing general position in displaying three-dimensional objects.Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing41, 1 (1988), 43–56. Rohan Katoch and Jun Ueda

    1988

  34. [65]

    IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters4, 4 (2019), 4467–4474

    Edge-preserving camera trajectories for improved optical character recognition on static scenes with text. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters4, 4 (2019), 4467–4474. Kevin Kennedy and Robert E Mercer

    2019

  35. [66]

    Kihwan Kim, Matthias Grundmann, Ariel Shamir, Iain Matthews, Jessica Hodgins, and Irfan Essa

    A review on Kalman filter models.Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering30, 1 (2023), 727–747. Kihwan Kim, Matthias Grundmann, Ariel Shamir, Iain Matthews, Jessica Hodgins, and Irfan Essa

    2023

  36. [67]

    Dirk P Kroese and Reuven Y Rubinstein

    Pac reinforcement learning with rich observations.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems29 (2016). Dirk P Kroese and Reuven Y Rubinstein

    2016

  37. [68]

    Zhengfei Kuang, Shengqu Cai, Hao He, Yinghao Xu, Hongsheng Li, Leonidas Guibas, and Gordon Wetzstein

    Monte carlo methods.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics4, 1 (2012), 48–58. Zhengfei Kuang, Shengqu Cai, Hao He, Yinghao Xu, Hongsheng Li, Leonidas Guibas, and Gordon Wetzstein

    2012

  38. [69]

    Pankaj Kumar, Anthony Dick, and Tan Soo Sheng

    Collaborative Video Diffusion: Consistent Multi-video Generation with Camera Control.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17414(2024). Pankaj Kumar, Anthony Dick, and Tan Soo Sheng

    2024 arXiv

  39. [70]

    Denise Lam, Chris Manzie, and Malcolm Good

    C 3 Net: end-to-end deep learning for efficient real-time visual active camera control.Journal of Real-Time Image Processing18, 4 (2021), 1421–1433. Denise Lam, Chris Manzie, and Malcolm Good

    2021

  40. [71]

    In International conference on machine learning

    Curl: Contrastive unsupervised representations for reinforcement learning. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 5639–5650. Jean-Claude Latombe. 2012.Robot motion planning. Vol

    2012

  41. [72]

    Chao Liang, Changsheng Xu, Jian Cheng, Weiqing Min, and Hanqing Lu

    Director3D: Real-world Camera Trajectory and 3D Scene Generation from Text.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.17601(2024). Chao Liang, Changsheng Xu, Jian Cheng, Weiqing Min, and Hanqing Lu

    2024 arXiv

  42. [73]

    Jinwei Lin

    Script-to-movie: a computational framework for story movie composition.IEEE transactions on multimedia15, 2 (2012), 401–414. Jinwei Lin

    2012

  43. [74]

    Christophe Lino and Marc Christie

    Dynamic NeRF: A Review.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.08609(2024). Christophe Lino and Marc Christie

    2024 arXiv

  44. [75]

    Graph.34, 4, Article 82 (July 2015), 12 pages

    Intuitive and efficient camera control with the toric space.ACM Trans. Graph.34, 4, Article 82 (July 2015), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2766965 Christophe Lino, Marc Christie, Roberto Ranon, and William Bares

    2015 doi

  45. [76]

    InProceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia

    The director’s lens: an intelligent assistant for virtual cinematography. InProceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Multimedia. 323–332. Alan Ulfers Litteneker. 2022.Towards Intelligent Computational Tools for Virtual Cinematography. University of California, L...

    2024 arXiv

  46. [77]

    Xinhang Liu, Yu-Wing Tai, and Chi-Keung Tang

    Planning dynamically feasible trajectories for quadrotors using safe flight corridors in 3-d complex environments.IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters2, 3 (2017), 1688–1695. Xinhang Liu, Yu-Wing Tai, and Chi-Keung Tang. 2024b. ChatCam: Empowering Camera Control through Convers...

    2017 arXiv

  47. [79]

    InProceedings ELMAR-2012

    Compositional rule of thirds detection. InProceedings ELMAR-2012. IEEE, 41–44. Ross T. Marler and Jasbir S. Arora

    2012

  48. [80]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0460-7 Tommaso Massaglia

    The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization41, 6 (2010), 853–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0460-7 Tommaso Massaglia. 2023.DreamShot: Teaching Cinema Shots to Latent Diffusion Models. Ph. D. Diss...

    2010 doi

  49. [81]

    In Proceedings of the Workshops of the EDBT/ICDT 2024 Joint Conference

    DreamShot: Teaching Cinema Shots to Latent Diffusion Models. In Proceedings of the Workshops of the EDBT/ICDT 2024 Joint Conference. CEUR-WS.org, 1–8. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3651/DARLI-AP-8.pdf Pedro Meseguer, Nadia Bouhmala, Tarek Bouzoubaa, et al

    2024

  50. [83]

    completely blind

    Optimal camera trajectory with image-based control.The International Journal of Robotics Research22, 10-11 (2003), 781–803. Anish Mittal, Anush Krishna Moorthy, and Alan Conrad Bovik. 2012a. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain.IEEE Transactions on image...

    2003

  51. [86]

    Muhammad Ferjad Naeem, Seong Joon Oh, Youngjung Uh, Yunjey Choi, and Jaejun Yoo

    Orb-slam2: An open-source slam system for monocular, stereo, and rgb-d cameras.IEEE transactions on robotics33, 5 (2017), 1255–1262. Muhammad Ferjad Naeem, Seong Joon Oh, Youngjung Uh, Yunjey Choi, and Jaejun Yoo

    2017

  52. [87]

    InInternational Conference on Machine Learning

    Reliable fidelity and diversity metrics for generative models. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 7176–7185. Tobias Nägeli, Javier Alonso-Mora, Alexander Domahidi, Daniela Rus, and Otmar Hilliges. 2017a. Real-time motion planning for aerial videography with ...

    2017

  53. [88]

    Uses A* algorithm for path planning in cinematographic contexts

    Visibility-aware roadmap construction and planning.Eurographics(2009). Uses A* algorithm for path planning in cinematographic contexts.. Abhilash Pandya, Luke A Reisner, Brady King, Nathan Lucas, Anthony Composto, Michael Klein, and Richard Darin Ellis

    2009

  54. [89]

    Sambhram Pattanayak, Saad Ullah Khan, Fazal Malik, and Somanath Sahoo

    A review of camera viewpoint automation in robotic and laparoscopic surgery.Robotics3, 3 (2014), 310–329. Sambhram Pattanayak, Saad Ullah Khan, Fazal Malik, and Somanath Sahoo

    2014

  55. [90]

    InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV)

    Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformers. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). 4195–4205. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.09748 Pablo Pueyo, Eduardo Montijano, Ana C Murillo, and Mac Schwager

    arXiv

  56. [91]

    In2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC)

    Optimal look-ahead vehicle lane centering control design and application for mid-high speed and curved roads. In2019 18th European Control Conference (ECC). 2024–2029. https://doi.org/10.23919/ECC.2019.8796031 Roberto ranon, Marc Christie, and Christophe Lino

    2024

  57. [92]

    Improving the efficiency of viewpoint composition.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics20, 5 (2014), 795–807. Machel Reid, Nikolay Savinov, Denis Teplyashin, Dmitry Lepikhin, Timothy Lillicrap, Jean-baptiste Alayrac, Radu Soricut, Angeliki Lazaridou, Orhan F...

    2014

  58. [93]

    Yanhao Ren, Nannan Yan, Xiao Yu, Fengfeng Tang, Qi Tang, Yi Wang, and Wenlian Lu

    Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05530(2024). Yanhao Ren, Nannan Yan, Xiao Yu, Fengfeng Tang, Qi Tang, Yi Wang, and Wenlian Lu

    2024 arXiv

  59. [94]

    Craig W Reynolds et al

    On automatic camera shooting systems via PTZ control and DNN-based visual sensing.Intelligent Service Robotics16, 3 (2023), 265–285. Craig W Reynolds et al

    2023

  60. [95]

    Rémi Ronfard, Vineet Gandhi, Laurent Boiron, and Vaishnavi Ameya Murukutla

    Generating dynamically feasible trajectories for quadrotor cameras.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)35, 4 (2016), 1–11. Rémi Ronfard, Vineet Gandhi, Laurent Boiron, and Vaishnavi Ameya Murukutla

    2016

  61. [96]

    Scott D Roth

    The prose storyboard language: A tool for annotating and directing movies.arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.07593(2015). Scott D Roth

    2015 arXiv

  62. [98]

    IEEE109, 3 (2021), 247–278

    Explaining deep neural networks and beyond: A review of methods and applications.Proc. IEEE109, 3 (2021), 247–278. Thomas Schops, Viktor Larsson, Marc Pollefeys, and Torsten Sattler

    2021

  63. [99]

    William R Scott, Gerhard Roth, and Jean-François Rivest

    Review on model predictive control: An engineering perspective.The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology117, 5 (2021), 1327–1349. William R Scott, Gerhard Roth, and Jean-François Rivest

    2021

  64. [100]

    Pavel Senin

    View planning for automated three-dimensional object reconstruction and inspection.ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)35, 1 (2003), 64–96. Pavel Senin

    2003

  65. [101]

    Dynamic time warping algorithm review.Information and Computer Science Department University of Hawaii at Manoa Honolulu, USA855, 1-23 (2008),

    2008

  66. [102]

    Xiaoyu Shi, Zhaoyang Huang, Weikang Bian, Dasong Li, Manyuan Zhang, Ka Chun Cheung, Simon See, Hongwei Qin, Jifeng Dai, and Hongsheng Li

    Optimal filter estimation for Lucas-Kanade optical flow.Sensors12, 9 (2012), 12694–12709. Xiaoyu Shi, Zhaoyang Huang, Weikang Bian, Dasong Li, Manyuan Zhang, Ka Chun Cheung, Simon See, Hongwei Qin, Jifeng Dai, and Hongsheng Li

    2012

  67. [103]

    Alex J Smola and Bernhard Schölkopf

    Automatic camera control in virtual environments augmented using multiple sparse videos.Computers & Graphics35, 2 (2011), 412–421. Alex J Smola and Bernhard Schölkopf

    2011

  68. [105]

    InACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Papers

    Photo Tourism: Exploring Photo Collections in 3D. InACM SIGGRAPH 2006 Papers. ACM, 835–846. https://doi.org/10.1145/1179352.1141964 Dmitry Sokolov, Dimitri Plemenos, and Karim Tamine

    2006

  69. [106]

    James Stewart

    Methods and data structures for virtual world exploration.The Visual Computer 22 (2006), 506–516. James Stewart. 2012.Calculus: early transcendentals. Cengage Learning. Wolfgang Stuerzlinger

    2006

  70. [107]

    Vijay Sai Kumar Sudabathula, Banoth Krishna Mohan Naik, Shifa Ismail, Sri Harsh Mattaparty, Gagan Deep Arora, and Guda Sravan Yadav

    Multi-camera trajectory forecasting with trajectory tensors.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence44, 11 (2021), 8482–8491. Vijay Sai Kumar Sudabathula, Banoth Krishna Mohan Naik, Shifa Ismail, Sri Harsh Mattaparty, Gagan Deep Arora, and Guda Sravan Yadav

    2021

  71. [108]

    Visual SLAM algorithms: a survey from 2010 to 2016.IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications9 (2017),

    2017

  72. [110]

    Dieter Van Rijsselbergen, Barbara Van De Keer, Maarten Verwaest, Erik Mannens, and Rik Van de Walle

    Towards accurate generative models of video: A new metric & challenges.arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01717(2018). Dieter Van Rijsselbergen, Barbara Van De Keer, Maarten Verwaest, Erik Mannens, and Rik Van de Walle

    2018 arXiv

  73. [112]

    Jeremy Vineyard

    Wiley Online Library, 689–700. Jeremy Vineyard. 2008.Setting Up Your Shots(2nd ed.). Michael Wiese, CA, USA. Ivan Viola, Miquel Feixas, Mateu Sbert, and Meister Eduard Groller

    2008

  74. [113]

    Jianyuan Wang, Christian Rupprecht, and David Novotny

    Importance-driven focus of attention.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics12, 5 (2006), 933–940. Jianyuan Wang, Christian Rupprecht, and David Novotny. 2023b. PoseDiffusion: Solving Pose Estimation via Diffusion-aided Bundle Adjustment. InICCV. https://arxiv...

    2006 arXiv

  75. [114]

    Jianyi Wang, Mai Xu, Lai Jiang, and Yuhang Song

    Attention-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning for Virtual Cinematography of 360 Videos.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia23 (2020), 3227–3238. Jianyi Wang, Mai Xu, Lai Jiang, and Yuhang Song

    2020

  76. [115]

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2020.3028955 , Vol

    Attention-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning for Virtual Cinematography of 360° Videos.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia23 (2021), 3227–3238. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2020.3028955 , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September

    2021

  77. [116]

    Camera Trajectory Generation: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods, Metrics, and Future Directions•65 Xi Wang, Robin Courant, Jinglei Shi, Eric Marchand, and Marc Christie. 2023a. JAWS: just a wild shot for cinematic transfer in neural radiance fields. InProceedings of the IEEE/C...

    2024

  78. [117]

    Xinyi Wu, Haohong Wang, and Aggelos K Katsaggelos

    Thinking like a director: Film editing patterns for virtual cinematographic storytelling.ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM)14, 4 (2018), 1–22. Xinyi Wu, Haohong Wang, and Aggelos K Katsaggelos

    2018

  79. [118]

    Wenqi Xian, Aljaž Božič, Noah Snavely, and Christoph Lassner

    The secret of immersion: actor driven camera movement generation for auto-cinematography.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17041(2023). Wenqi Xian, Aljaž Božič, Noah Snavely, and Christoph Lassner

    2023 arXiv

  80. [119]

    InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Neural lens modeling. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 8435–8445. Chun Xie, Isao Hemmi, Hidehiko Shishido, and Itaru Kitahara. 2023a. Camera Motion Generation Method Based on Performer’s Position for Performance Filming. InPr...

  81. [120]

    Shiyuan Yang, Liang Hou, Haibin Huang, Chongyang Ma, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, Xiaodong Chen, and Jing Liao

    CamCo: Camera-Controllable 3D-Consistent Image-to-Video Generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02509(2024). Shiyuan Yang, Liang Hou, Haibin Huang, Chongyang Ma, Pengfei Wan, Di Zhang, Xiaodong Chen, and Jing Liao

    2024 arXiv

  82. [121]

    InACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers

    Direct-a-video: Customized video generation with user-directed camera movement and object motion. InACM SIGGRAPH 2024 Conference Papers. 1–12. Vickie Ye, Georgios Pavlakos, Jitendra Malik, and Angjoo Kanazawa

    2024

  83. [122]

    InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Virtual camera layout generation using a reference video. InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11. Zixiao Yu, Enhao Guo, Haohong Wang, and Jian Ren. 2022a. Bridging script and animation utilizing a new automatic cinematography model...

    2023

  84. [123]

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2023.3347092 Zixiao Yu, Chenyu Yu, Haohong Wang, and Jian Ren

    Automated Adaptive Cinematography for User Interaction in Open World.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia26 (2024), 6178–6190. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2023.3347092 Zixiao Yu, Chenyu Yu, Haohong Wang, and Jian Ren. 2022b. Enabling Automatic Cinematography with Reinforcement Lear...

    2024

  85. [125]

    Zhengyou Zhang

    Survey and evaluation of RGB-D SLAM.IEEE Access9 (2021), 21367–21387. Zhengyou Zhang. 2021a. Camera calibration. InComputer vision: a reference guide. Springer, 130–131. Zhengyou Zhang. 2021b. Camera Extrinsic Parameters. InComputer Vision: A Reference Guide. Springer, 131–131...

    2021

  86. [126]

    Surveys56, 1 (2023), 1–37

    Deep learning-based human pose estimation: A survey.Comput. Surveys56, 1 (2023), 1–37. Tinghui Zhou, Richard Tucker, John Flynn, Graham Fyffe, and Noah Snavely

    2023

  87. [127]

    Stereo magnification: Learning view synthesis using multiplane images.arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.09817(2018). , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September

    2018 arXiv

  88. [128]

    Zhizhuo Zhou and Shubham Tulsiani

    Continuous Control Reinforcement Learning: Distributed Distributional DrQ Algorithms.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.10645 (2024). Zhizhuo Zhou and Shubham Tulsiani

    2024 arXiv

  89. [129]

    SparseFusion: Distilling View-conditioned Diffusion for 3D Reconstruction. InCVPR. https: //doi.org/10.1109/CVPR46700.2023.00193 Cheng Zhu, Guohui Zhang, and Xin Li

    2023

  90. [130]

    InProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo

    Trajectory generation for camera control in soccer match broadcasting. InProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. 806–809. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICME.2009.5202588 Fang Zhu, Shuai Guo, Li Song, Ke Xu, Jiayu Hu, et al

    2009

  91. [131]

    Deep review and analysis of recent nerfs.APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing12, 1 (2023). Mu Zhu

    2023

  92. [132]

    Recall, precision and average precision.Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo2, 30 (2004),

    2004

  93. [133]

    CHOMP: Covariant Hamiltonian optimization for motion planning.The International Journal of Robotics Research32, 9-10 (2013), 1164–1193. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September 2025

    2013

  94. [1966]

    Yoshua Bengio

    Dynamic programming.science153, 3731 (1966), 34–37. Yoshua Bengio

    1966

  95. [1967]

    Kalyanmoy Deb and Matthias Ehrgott

    Nearest neighbor pattern classification.IEEE transactions on information theory13, 1 (1967), 21–27. Kalyanmoy Deb and Matthias Ehrgott

    1967

  96. [1969]

    Pere-Pau Vázquez, Miquel Feixas, Mateu Sbert, and Wolfgang Heidrich

    Markov processes over denumerable products of spaces, describing large systems of automata.Problemy Peredachi Informatsii5, 3 (1969), 64–72. Pere-Pau Vázquez, Miquel Feixas, Mateu Sbert, and Wolfgang Heidrich

    1969

  97. [1976]

    Amirsaman Ashtari, Stefan Stevšić, Tobias Nägeli, Jean-Charles Bazin, and Otmar Hilliges

    Grammar of the film language.(Hastings House Publishers)(1976). Amirsaman Ashtari, Stefan Stevšić, Tobias Nägeli, Jean-Charles Bazin, and Otmar Hilliges

    1976

  98. [1982]

    Gauthier Rousseau, Cristina Stoica Maniu, Sihem Tebbani, Mathieu Babel, and Nicolas Martin

    Ray casting for modeling solids.Computer graphics and image processing18, 2 (1982), 109–144. Gauthier Rousseau, Cristina Stoica Maniu, Sihem Tebbani, Mathieu Babel, and Nicolas Martin

    1982

  99. [1988]

    https://doi.org/10.1109/38.7751 Rogerio Bonatti, Arthur Bucker, Sebastian Scherer, Mustafa Mukadam, and Jessica Hodgins

    Where am I? What am I looking at? (cinematography).IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications8, 4 (1988), 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.7751 Rogerio Bonatti, Arthur Bucker, Sebastian Scherer, Mustafa Mukadam, and Jessica Hodgins

    1988 doi

  100. [1990]

    Least squares methods.Handbook of numerical analysis1 (1990), 465–652. J. Blinn

    1990

  101. [1999]

    Junyi Zhang, Charles Herrmann, Junhwa Hur, Varun Jampani, Trevor Darrell, Forrester Cole, Deqing Sun, and Ming-Hsuan Yang

    C-Bézier Curves and Surfaces.Graphical Models and Image Processing61, 1 (1999), 2–15. Junyi Zhang, Charles Herrmann, Junhwa Hur, Varun Jampani, Trevor Darrell, Forrester Cole, Deqing Sun, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. 2024a. Monst3r: A simple approach for estimating geometry in the pre...

    1999 arXiv

  102. [2000]

    InSmart Graphics (Papers from the 2000 AAAI Symposium)

    A model for constraint-based camera planning. InSmart Graphics (Papers from the 2000 AAAI Symposium). Richard Bellman

    2000

  103. [2001]

    Interactive order-independent transparency.White paper, nVIDIA2, 6 (2001),

    2001

  104. [2003]

    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021902812784 , Vol

    Current Approaches for Solving Over-Constrained Problems.Constraints8 (2003), 9–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021902812784 , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September

    2003 doi

  105. [2004]

    Noah Snavely, Steven M

    A tutorial on support vector regression.Statistics and computing14 (2004), 199–222. Noah Snavely, Steven M. Seitz, and Richard Szeliski

    2004

  106. [2006]

    Joseph G Eisenhauer

    Simultaneous localization and mapping: part I.IEEE robotics & automation magazine13, 2 (2006), 99–110. Joseph G Eisenhauer

    2006

  107. [2007]

    Raul Mur-Artal and Juan D Tardós

    Dynamic time warping.Information retrieval for music and motion(2007), 69–84. Raul Mur-Artal and Juan D Tardós

    2007

  108. [2008]

    2008), 2197–2218

    Camera Control in Computer Graphics.Computer Graphics Forum27, 8 (Dec. 2008), 2197–2218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01181.x Nguyen Cong Danh

    2008

  109. [2009]

    InACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2009 Courses

    Camera control in computer graphics: models, techniques and applications. InACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2009 Courses. 1–197. Marc Christie, Patrick Olivier, and Jean-Marie Normand

    2009

  110. [2010]

    Gérard Biau and Erwan Scornet

    An empirical pipeline to derive gaze prediction heuristics for 3D action games.ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP)8, 1 (2010), 1–30. Gérard Biau and Erwan Scornet

    2010

  111. [2011]

    Paolo Burelli

    On the mathematical properties of the structural similarity index.IEEE Transactions on Image Processing21, 4 (2011), 1488–1499. Paolo Burelli

    2011

  112. [2012]

    Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio

    Interior point methods 25 years later.European Journal of Operational Research218, 3 (2012), 587–601. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio

    2012

  113. [2013]

    Meinard Müller

    Towards no-reference of peak signal to noise ratio.International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications4, 1 (2013). Meinard Müller

    2013

  114. [2014]

    Mohammad OA Aqel, Mohammad H Marhaban, M Iqbal Saripan, and Napsiah Bt Ismail

    Evaluating the rule of thirds in photographs and paintings.Art & Perception2, 1-2 (2014), 163–182. Mohammad OA Aqel, Mohammad H Marhaban, M Iqbal Saripan, and Napsiah Bt Ismail

    2014

  115. [2016]

    Daniel Arijon

    Review of visual odometry: types, approaches, challenges, and applications.SpringerPlus5 (2016), 1–26. Daniel Arijon

    2016

  116. [2017]

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel

    Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium.Advances in neural information processing systems30 (2017). Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel

    2017

  117. [2018]

    arXiv:1811.08086 [cs.RO] https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.08086 Seyed Ali Amirshahi, Gregor Uwe Hayn-Leichsenring, Joachim Denzler, and Christoph Redies

    Model Learning for Look-ahead Exploration in Continuous Control. arXiv:1811.08086 [cs.RO] https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.08086 Seyed Ali Amirshahi, Gregor Uwe Hayn-Leichsenring, Joachim Denzler, and Christoph Redies

    arXiv

  118. [2019]

    In2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)

    Towards a robust aerial cinematography platform: Localizing and tracking moving targets in unstructured environments. In2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 229–236. Rogerio Bonatti, Wenshan Wang, Cherie Ho, Aayush Ahuja, Mirko...

    2020

  119. [2020]

    Adrian Azzarelli, Nantheera Anantrasirichai, and David R Bull

    Capturing subjective first-person view shots with drones for automated cinematography.ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)39, 5 (2020), 1–14. Adrian Azzarelli, Nantheera Anantrasirichai, and David R Bull

    2020

  120. [2021]

    A review of PID control, tuning methods and applications.International Journal of Dynamics and Control9 (2021), 818–827. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September

    2021

  121. [2022]

    Tutorial on directed acyclic graphs.Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 142 (2022), 264–267. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: September

    2022

  122. [2023]

    Amir Bar, Gaoyue Zhou, Danny Tran, Trevor Darrell, and Yann LeCun

    Camera motion detection for story and multimedia information convergence.Personal and Ubiquitous Computing27, 3 (2023), 1221–1231. Amir Bar, Gaoyue Zhou, Danny Tran, Trevor Darrell, and Yann LeCun

    2023

  123. [2024]

    Jianhong Bai, Tianyu He, Yuchi Wang, Junliang Guo, Haoji Hu, Zuozhu Liu, and Jiang Bian

    Reviewing Intelligent Cinematography: AI research for camera-based video production.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.05039(2024). Jianhong Bai, Tianyu He, Yuchi Wang, Junliang Guo, Haoji Hu, Zuozhu Liu, and Jiang Bian

    2024 arXiv

  124. [2025]

    Jean C Digitale, Jeffrey N Martin, and Medellena Maria Glymour

    LensCraft: Your Professional Virtual Cinematographer.arXiv preprint(2025). Jean C Digitale, Jeffrey N Martin, and Medellena Maria Glymour

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.