Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 56 references

Rational and non-rational two-dimensional conformal field theories arising from lattices

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read An even lattice Q in an indefinite inner product space builds every discrete two-dimensional conformal extension of the Heisenberg net, up to unitary equivalence.

desk verdict A careful, genuinely new construction of 2d conformal nets from even lattices, with a classification that is honestly conditional and worth serious review. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.01008 v1 pith:ERA4TJOL submitted 2025-06-01 math-ph math.MPmath.OAmath.RT

classification math-phmath.MPmath.OAmath.RT MSC 81T4081R1017B6946L60 PACS 11.25.Hf
keywords conformalnetsHeisenbergalgebrasevenlatticestwo-dimensionalfieldtheorybraidedtensorcategoriesWightmanfieldsrationalCFTU(1)-currentalgebra
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper constructs two-dimensional conformal field theories as extensions of the Heisenberg conformal net, driven by the data of an even lattice $Q$ inside a real Hilbert space $\mathfrak h$ equipped with the indefinite bilinear form $(\alpha|\beta) = (p\alpha,p\beta)_{\mathfrak h} - (\bar p\alpha,\bar p\beta)_{\mathfrak h}$. It proves that, whenever the charge spectrum of an extension is discrete, every such extension is unitarily equivalent to the lattice net $\mathcal A_Q$. In the concrete case $\mathfrak h = \mathbb R^2$ with $p$ one-dimensional, the chiral components are rational exactly when $R^2$ is rational, and remain the non-rational Heisenberg net when $R^2$ is irrational. The same charge and braiding structures are then used to build two-dimensional conformal Wightman fields that generate the extended nets in some cases.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the even lattice $Q\subset\mathfrak h$ with respect to the indefinite bilinear form $(\alpha|\beta)=(p\alpha,p\beta)_{\mathfrak h}-(\bar p\alpha,\bar p\beta)_{\mathfrak h}$, together with its $\{\pm1\}$-valued 2-cocycle $\epsilon$ from the standard twisted group algebra construction. The net $\mathcal A_Q$ is defined on the Hilbert space $\mathcal H_Q=\bigoplus_{\lambda\in Q} \mathcal H_{p\lambda,h}\otimes \mathcal H_{\bar p\lambda,h}$ by adjoining to the Heisenberg net the twisted shift operators $\psi_\alpha$ with $\psi_\alpha\psi_\beta = (-1)^{(\alpha|\beta)}\psi_\beta\psi_\alpha$ and $(\psi_\alpha)^* = \epsilon(\alpha,\alpha)\psi_{-\alpha}$; the cocycle encodes the projective phases needed for locality, and the braiding identity $e^{i\pi(\alpha|\beta)} = \varepsilon^+_{p\alpha,p\beta}\,\varepsilon^-_{\bar p\alpha,\bar p\beta}$ is what makes the shifted operators commute on spacelike-separated double cones. In the classification proof, the same cocycle appears as the obstruction that must be a 2-coboundary, forcing the canonical form $\mathcal A_Q$.

What would settle it

Exhibit a local conformal extension of $\mathcal A_{p\mathfrak h}\otimes\mathcal A_{\bar p\mathfrak h}$ that satisfies the discrete-spectrum assumption but is not unitarily equivalent to any $\mathcal A_Q$ with $Q$ an even lattice; for instance, a discrete extension whose charge set is an additive subgroup that is not an even lattice, or whose 2-cocycle $Z(\alpha,\beta)$ violates $Z(\alpha,\beta)Z(\beta,\alpha)^{-1}=e^{i(\alpha|\beta)}$, would disprove the classification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is a bijection between even lattices and local conformal extensions of the two-dimensional Heisenberg net under a discreteness hypothesis: Theorem 5.5 states that if the restriction of the vacuum representation to $\mathcal A_{p\mathfrak h} \otimes \mathcal A_{\bar p\mathfrak h}$ is a direct sum of irreducible sectors $\sigma_{p\lambda,h} \otimes \sigma_{\bar p\lambda,h}$ indexed by a discrete set $Q \subset \mathfrak h$, then each sector appears once, $Q$ is an even lattice with respect to the indefinite form, and the extension is unitarily equivalent to the explicitly constructed net $\mathcal A_Q$. The construction is carried out by forming the Hilbert space $\mathcal H_Q = \bigoplus_{\lambda\in Q} \mathcal H_{p\lambda,h} \otimes \mathcal H_{\bar p\lambda,h}$, implementing lattice translations by twisted shift operators built from the 2-cocycle $\epsilon$ of the even lattice, and checking locality through the identity $e^{i\pi(\alpha|\beta)} = \varepsilon^+_{p\alpha,p\beta}\,\varepsilon^-_{\bar p\alpha,\bar p\beta}$ that links the lattice inner product to the braiding of the chiral and antichiral Heisenberg sectors. The examples with $\mathfrak h = \mathbb R^2$, $p$ one-dimensional and $Q$ generated by $\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(R\oplus R)$ and $\frac{1}{\sqrt2}(R^{-1}\oplus(-R^{-1}))$ show both worlds: the chiral components are rational extensions of the U(1)-current net when $R^2\in\mathbb Q$, and stay the non-rational Heisenberg net when $R^2\notin\mathbb Q$, with a braided tensor autoequivalence of a subcategory serving as the categorical shadow of the extension.

Load-bearing premise

The classification in Theorem 5.5 assumes that the vacuum representation of the extension decomposes as a direct sum of irreducible charge sectors indexed by a discrete set $Q$; if the charge spectrum is not discrete, the argument that the charges form a lattice breaks down and non-lattice extensions such as Example 3.5 exist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under the discrete-spectrum assumption, the classification of two-dimensional Heisenberg extensions is reduced to the arithmetic problem of listing even lattices $Q$ in an indefinite inner-product space.
  • In the $\mathbb R^2$ examples, rationality of the chiral components is decided by $R^2\in\mathbb Q$: rational $R^2$ gives rational chiral extensions of the U(1)-current net, while irrational $R^2$ leaves the non-rational Heisenberg net as the chiral component.
  • The non-rational examples carry a braided tensor autoequivalence of a subcategory of the chiral representation category, with the lattice 2-cocycle as a non-trivial tensorator, so categorical data exists beyond the rational and finite-index setting.
  • The charge-carrying formal vertex operators can be smeared into two-dimensional conformal Wightman fields satisfying the Wightman axioms, and when both $(p\alpha,p\alpha)_{\mathfrak h}$ and $(\bar p\alpha,\bar p\alpha)_{\mathfrak h}$ are at most $1$, the fields are bounded and generate the net $\mathcal A_Q$.
  • The construction permits $\dim p\neq \dim \bar p$, so the chiral and antichiral components may have different central charges.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the discrete classification is taken as a template, it suggests that non-rational two-dimensional CFTs of Heisenberg type may be parameterized by even lattices in an indefinite inner-product space, with rationality appearing as an arithmetic property of the lattice rather than as a separate input.
  • The braided autoequivalence found for irrational $R^2$ hints that full non-rational CFTs may admit a classification by braided equivalences of proper subcategories of the chiral representation category, paralleling the rational module-category picture but without requiring finite index.
  • A concrete open test suggested by the paper is whether non-discrete local extensions of $\mathcal A_Q$ exist when $R^2$ is irrational; if one exists, it would show that the word "maximal" for $\mathcal A_Q$ depends on the discreteness assumption in Theorem 5.5.
  • One could test the Wightman-field generation beyond the bounded range by checking whether the polynomial energy bounds for $Y_\alpha$ hold for all lattice charges; if they do, the fields would generate $\mathcal A_Q$ for every even lattice, not only for charges of norm at most one.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs two-dimensional conformal nets A_Q extending the tensor product A_ph ⊗ A_barph of Heisenberg nets, associated to an even lattice Q in a finite-dimensional real Hilbert space h with respect to the indefinite form (alpha|beta) = (p alpha, p beta)_h - (bar p alpha, bar p beta)_h. The construction uses a canonical 2-cocycle and twisted shift operators. Under a discreteness/direct-sum hypothesis, Theorem 5.5 gives a converse: every local conformal extension of the Heisenberg net whose vacuum representation restricts to a direct sum of irreducible sectors over a discrete set of charges is unitarily equivalent to some A_Q. The paper also studies explicit examples with h = R^2, showing that the chiral components can be rational or non-rational depending on R^2, constructs a braided equivalence of a subcategory of the chiral representation category in the non-rational case, and builds two-dimensional Wightman fields that generate the extended nets in some parameter ranges.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper provides a substantial step beyond the rational finite-index setting: a general construction and a classification, under explicit hypotheses, of two-dimensional conformal net extensions of Heisenberg nets, together with genuinely non-rational examples. Strengths include the detailed proofs of Theorems 3.2 and 5.5, the honest and explicit statement of the discreteness/direct-sum hypothesis, the acknowledgment in Example 3.5 that non-discrete extensions exist outside the classification, and the explicit braided equivalence with non-trivial tensorator in Section 4. The proof of the Wightman axioms in Section 6.3 is partly delegated to prior work, but the key locality computation is carried out in the paper. The reliance on externally published technical results is substantial but not circular.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 5] The abstract's phrase 'any two-dimensional extension' is broader than Theorem 5.5, which requires both a direct-sum decomposition of the vacuum representation into irreducible sectors and discreteness of the charge set Q, not merely discreteness of the spectrum. Since Example 3.5 shows that non-discrete additive subgroups produce extensions outside the theorem, the abstract should explicitly mention the direct-sum hypothesis.
  2. [Example 3.3] The condition 'R^2 in Q' uses the same symbol Q as the lattice, which is confusing; the rationals should be denoted by a distinct symbol such as \mathbb{Q} throughout the example and the introduction.
  3. [Section 6.1] In the definitions following equation (6.3), the summation index is written as 'z in Z' in two places, where 'n in Z' is clearly meant; the same typo appears in the definition of E_+(alpha,z) and should be corrected.
  4. [Section 4] The diagram defining the tensorator uses '1' both for the identity morphism and for the scalar 1, which makes the computation hard to follow; labelling the identity arrow explicitly would improve readability.
  5. [Section 6.3] The proof of Theorem 6.1 states that the verification of the Wightman axioms is brief except for locality, but it does not list precisely which axioms are checked in [AGT23] and which are checked here; a short sentence identifying the delegated results would be helpful to the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the construction and conditional classification are driven by the input lattice Q, with the 2-cocycle derived canonically and the converse proven from the extension data.

full rationale

The central derivation is not circular. In Section 3.2 the 2-cocycle epsilon is obtained from the input even lattice Q by the standard Kac formula, and A_Q is built from Q; no quantity is fitted to the extensions being classified. Theorem 5.5 goes in the opposite direction: starting from a local extension B whose restriction to A_ph⊗A_barph is a discrete direct sum, Lemma 5.3 and Lemma 5.4 derive that the charge set Q is an even lattice and that locality forces (α|α)∈2Z, and the theorem then shows that the cocycle of B differs from the Kac cocycle by a coboundary, which is absorbed by a unitary V. This is a genuine reduction, not an assumption of the conclusion. The discreteness hypothesis is openly stated and Example 3.5 exhibits non-discrete extensions outside the theorem, so the classification is conditional rather than overclaimed. The self-citations ([AGT23], [AGT25], [LT18], [MTW18]) supply technical infrastructure such as diffeomorphism covariance, type I property, and energy bounds; they are paired with independent references ([Gui21], [BMT88], [TL97], [Bau95]) and do not function as a self-citation chain forcing the main result.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Most inputs are structural: a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, an orthogonal projection p, and an even lattice Q. The only example-family parameter is R. The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted constants; the 2-cocycle epsilon is canonically determined by Q via Kac's formula.

free parameters (1)
  • R = any nonzero real R
    Continuous parameter in the explicit two-dimensional example family (Example 3.1). It is not fitted to data; the rational/non-rational dichotomy depends on whether R^2 is rational.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Every irreducible representation of the U(1)-current net A_R is a charge automorphism sigma_{alpha,h} up to unitary equivalence, with fusion given by addition of charges.
    Used to identify the irreducible sectors of A_ph tensor A_bar ph in Proposition 5.2 and Theorem 5.5; cited to [BMT88, Section 2B, 3B], [LT18, Proposition 3.11], [Zel17], [CW].
  • domain assumption Each sector sigma_{alpha,h} admits a diffeomorphism covariant positive-energy multiplier representation U_{alpha,h} with braiding epsilon^pm_{alpha h, beta h} = e^{pm i pi (alpha, beta)_h}.
    Used in the locality proof of Theorem 3.2 and in the braided equivalence computation of Section 4.2; from [AGT25, Section 5.2], [Gui21, Theorem 2.2] and computed in Section 2.3.2.
  • standard math Arveson spectrum theory for the unitary representation e^{is dot q} on B(O) yields spectral subspaces B(O, AdV, lambda) as in [Bau95, Theorem 1.8.4].
    Used in Lemma 5.3 to extract charge-carrying isometries phi_alpha from the joint spectrum of the charge operators; requires the spectrum to be discrete.
  • standard math A scalar 2-cocycle of an abelian group whose antisymmetric part is fixed is a 2-coboundary up to an explicit coboundary; [Bau95, Lemma 3.4.2].
    Used in Theorem 5.5 to normalize arbitrary cocycles Z(alpha, beta) to the standard lattice cocycle epsilon and prove unitary equivalence with A_Q.
  • domain assumption Vertex operators Y_{p alpha}(z) and Y_{bar p alpha}(bar z) satisfy polynomial energy bounds with constants independent of the sector in the ranges used.
    Used in Section 6.3 to define smeared Wightman fields and in Example 6.2 to infer boundedness and generation of the net; cited to [TL97, Proposition VI.1.2.1] and [Gui19, Theorem A.2].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rational and non-rational two-dimensional conformal field theories arising from lattices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ERA4TJOL

@misc{pith2026250601008,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rational and non-rational two-dimensional conformal field theories arising from lattices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ERA4TJOL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.01008}
}
abstract

For a (finite-dimensional) real Hilbert space $\mathfrak h$ and an orthogonal projection $p$, we consider the associated Heisenberg Lie algebra and the two-dimensional Heisenberg conformal net. Given an even lattice $Q$ in $\mathfrak h$ with respect to the indefinite bilinear form on $\mathfrak h$ defined by $p$, we construct a two-dimensional conformal net ${\mathcal A}_Q$ extending the Heisenberg conformal net. Moreover, with a certain discreteness assumption on the spectrum of the extension, we show that any two-dimensional extension of the Heisenberg conformal net is of the form ${\mathcal A}_Q$ up to unitary equivalence. We consider explicit examples of even lattices where $\mathfrak h$ is two-dimensional and $p$ is one-dimensional, and we show that the extended net may have completely rational or non-completely rational chiral (i.e. one-dimensional lightray) components, depending on the choice of lattice. In the non-rational case, we exhibit the braided equivalence of a certain subcategory of the representation category of the chiral Heisenberg net corresponding to the two-dimensional lattice extension. Inspired by the charge and braiding structures of these nets, we construct two-dimensional conformal Wightman fields on the same Hilbert spaces. We show that, in some cases, these Wightman fields generate the corresponding extended nets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wightman fields for two-dimensional conformal field theories with pointed representation category

    Maria Stella Adamo, Luca Giorgetti, and Yoh Tanimoto. Wightman fields for two-dimensional conformal field theories with pointed representation category. Comm. Math. Phys. , 404(3):1231--1273, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.12310

  2. [2]

    Representations of conformal nets associated with infinite-dimensional groups

    Maria Stella Adamo, Luca Giorgetti, and Yoh Tanimoto. Representations of conformal nets associated with infinite-dimensional groups. 2025

  3. [3]

    Osterwalder-- S chrader axioms for unitary full vertex operator algebras

    Maria Stella Adamo, Yuto Moriwaki, and Yoh Tanimoto. Osterwalder-- S chrader axioms for unitary full vertex operator algebras. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.18222

  4. [4]

    Reflection positivity and Hankel operators -- the multiplicity free case

    Maria Stella Adamo, Karl-Hermann Neeb, and Jonas Schober. Reflection positivity and H ankel operators---the multiplicity free case. J. Funct. Anal. , 283(2):Paper No. 109493, 50, 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.08522

  5. [5]

    Reflection positivity and its relation to disc, half plane and the strip

    Maria Stella Adamo, Karl-Hermann Neeb, and Jonas Schober. Reflection positivity and its relation to disc, half plane and the strip. Expo. Math. , 43(4):Paper No. 125660, 50, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21123

  6. [6]

    Mathematical theory of quantum fields , volume 101 of International Series of Monographs on Physics

    Huzihiro Araki. Mathematical theory of quantum fields , volume 101 of International Series of Monographs on Physics . Oxford University Press, New York, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198517733.001.0001

  7. [7]

    Operator algebraic methods in quantum field theory

    Hellmut Baumg \"a rtel. Operator algebraic methods in quantum field theory . Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1995. https://books.google.com/books?id=rq3vAAAAMAAJ

  8. [8]

    Characterization of 2D rational local conformal nets and its boundary conditions: the maximal case

    Marcel Bischoff, Yasuyuki Kawahigashi, and Roberto Longo. Characterization of 2 D rational local conformal nets and its boundary conditions: the maximal case. Doc. Math. , 20:1137--1184, 2015. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8848

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Scaling limits of integrable quantum field theories

    Henning Bostelmann, Gandalf Lechner, and Gerardo Morsella. Scaling limits of integrable quantum field theories. Rev. Math. Phys. , 23(10):1115--1156, 2011. https://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2781

  2. [10]

    The current algebra on the circle as a germ of local field theories

    Detlev Buchholz, Gerhard Mack, and Ivan Todorov. The current algebra on the circle as a germ of local field theories. Nuclear Phys. B Proc. Suppl. , 5B:20--56, 1988. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222585851

  3. [11]

    H aag duality in conformal quantum field theory

    Detlev Buchholz and Hanns Schulz-Mirbach. H aag duality in conformal quantum field theory. Rev. Math. Phys. , 2(1):105--125, 1990. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/246352668

  4. [12]

    On the representation theory of V irasoro nets

    Sebastiano Carpi. On the representation theory of V irasoro nets. Comm. Math. Phys. , 244(2):261--284, 2004. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0306425

  5. [13]

    From vertex operator algebras to conformal nets and back

    Sebastiano Carpi, Yasuyuki Kawahigashi, Roberto Longo, and Mih\'aly Weiner. From vertex operator algebras to conformal nets and back. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 254(1213):vi+85, 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.01260

  6. [14]

    Thermal states in conformal QFT

    Paolo Camassa, Roberto Longo, Yoh Tanimoto, and Mih \'a ly Weiner. Thermal states in conformal QFT . I . Comm. Math. Phys. , 309(3):703--735, 2012. https://arxiv.org/abs/1101.2865

  7. [15]

    Local energy bounds and representations of conformal nets

    Sebastiano Carpi and Mih\'aly Weiner. Local energy bounds and representations of conformal nets. in preparation

  8. [16]

    On the uniqueness of diffeomorphism symmetry in conformal field theory

    Sebastiano Carpi and Mih \'a ly Weiner. On the uniqueness of diffeomorphism symmetry in conformal field theory. Comm. Math. Phys. , 258(1):203--221, 2005. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0407190

  9. [17]

    Mathematics of quantization and quantum fields

    Jan Derezi\'nski and Christian G\'erard. Mathematics of quantization and quantum fields . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894541

  10. [18]

    Sergio Doplicher, Rudolf Haag, and John E. Roberts. Local observables and particle statistics. I . Comm. Math. Phys. , 23:199--230, 1971. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1103857630

  11. [19]

    The W itt group of non-degenerate braided fusion categories

    Alexei Davydov, Michael M\" u ger, Dmitri Nikshych, and Victor Ostrik. The W itt group of non-degenerate braided fusion categories. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 677:135--177, 2013. https://arxiv.org/abs/1009.2117

  12. [20]

    On the structure of the W itt group of braided fusion categories

    Alexei Davydov, Dmitri Nikshych, and Victor Ostrik. On the structure of the W itt group of braided fusion categories. Selecta Math. (N.S.) , 19(1):237--269, 2013. https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.5558

  13. [21]

    Sergio Doplicher and John E. Roberts. Why there is a field algebra with a compact gauge group describing the superselection structure in particle physics. Comm. Math. Phys. , 131(1):51--107, 1990. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1104200703

  14. [22]

    Tensor categories , volume 205 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs

    Pavel Etingof, Shlomo Gelaki, Dmitri Nikshych, and Victor Ostrik. Tensor categories , volume 205 of Mathematical Surveys and Monographs . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2015. https://math.mit.edu/ etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf

  15. [23]

    Conformal H aag- K astler nets, pointlike localized fields and the existence of operator product expansions

    Klaus Fredenhagen and Martin J \"o r . Conformal H aag- K astler nets, pointlike localized fields and the existence of operator product expansions. Comm. Math. Phys. , 176(3):541--554, 1996. https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1104286114

  16. [24]

    Vertex operator algebras and the M onster , volume 134 of Pure and Applied Mathematics

    Igor Frenkel, James Lepowsky, and Arne Meurman. Vertex operator algebras and the M onster , volume 134 of Pure and Applied Mathematics . Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1988. https://www.sciencedirect.com/bookseries/pure-and-applied-mathematics/vol/134

  17. [25]

    Fredenhagen, K.-H

    K. Fredenhagen, K.-H. Rehren, and B. Schroer. Superselection sectors with braid group statistics and exchange algebras. I .\ G eneral theory. Comm. Math. Phys. , 125(2):201--226, 1989. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1104179464

  18. [26]

    T FT construction of RCFT correlators

    J\"urgen Fuchs, Ingo Runkel, and Christoph Schweigert. T FT construction of RCFT correlators. I . P artition functions. Nuclear Phys. B , 646(3):353--497, 2002. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0204148

  19. [27]

    u rg Fr \

    Fabrizio Gabbiani and J \"u rg Fr \"o hlich. Operator algebras and conformal field theory. Comm. Math. Phys. , 155(3):569--640, 1993. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1104253398

  20. [28]

    Review on the probabilistic construction and conformal bootstrap in L iouville theory

    Colin Guillarmou, Antti Kupiainen, and Rémi Rhodes. Review on the probabilistic construction and conformal bootstrap in L iouville theory. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.12780

  21. [29]

    Guido, R

    D. Guido, R. Longo, and H.-W. Wiesbrock. Extensions of conformal nets and superselection structures. Comm. Math. Phys. , 192(1):217--244, 1998. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9703129

  22. [30]

    Energy bounds condition for intertwining operators of types B , C , and G_2 unitary affine vertex operator algebras

    Bin Gui. Energy bounds condition for intertwining operators of types B , C , and G_2 unitary affine vertex operator algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 372(10):7371--7424, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.07003

  23. [31]

    Categorical extensions of conformal nets

    Bin Gui. Categorical extensions of conformal nets. Comm. Math. Phys. , 383(2):763--839, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04470

  24. [32]

    Local quantum physics

    Rudolf Haag. Local quantum physics . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 1996. https://books.google.com/books?id=OlLmCAAAQBAJ

  25. [33]

    Full field algebras

    Yi-Zhi Huang and Liang Kong. Full field algebras. Comm. Math. Phys. , 272(2):345--396, 2007. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0511328

  26. [34]

    Vertex algebras for beginners , volume 10 of University Lecture Series

    Victor Kac. Vertex algebras for beginners , volume 10 of University Lecture Series . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, second edition, 1998. https://books.google.com/books?id=e-jxBwAAQBAJ

  27. [35]

    Classification of local conformal nets

    Yasuyuki Kawahigashi and Roberto Longo. Classification of local conformal nets. C ase c<1 . Ann. of Math. (2) , 160(2):493--522, 2004. https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0201015

  28. [36]

    Classification of two-dimensional local conformal nets with c<1 and 2-cohomology vanishing for tensor categories

    Yasuyuki Kawahigashi and Roberto Longo. Classification of two-dimensional local conformal nets with c<1 and 2-cohomology vanishing for tensor categories. Comm. Math. Phys. , 244(1):63--97, 2004. https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0304022

  29. [37]

    Multi-interval subfactors and modularity of representations in conformal field theory

    Yasuyuki Kawahigashi, Roberto Longo, and Michael M \"u ger. Multi-interval subfactors and modularity of representations in conformal field theory. Comm. Math. Phys. , 219(3):631--669, 2001. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9903104

  30. [38]

    Full field algebras, operads and tensor categories

    Liang Kong. Full field algebras, operads and tensor categories. Adv. Math. , 213(1):271--340, 2007. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0603065

  31. [39]

    L \"u scher and G

    M. L \"u scher and G. Mack. Global conformal invariance in quantum field theory. Comm. Math. Phys. , 41:203--234, 1975. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1103898909

  32. [40]

    Conformal subnets and intermediate subfactors

    Roberto Longo. Conformal subnets and intermediate subfactors. Comm. Math. Phys. , 237(1-2):7--30, 2003. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0102196

  33. [41]

    Longo and J

    R. Longo and J. E. Roberts. A theory of dimension. K -Theory , 11(2):103--159, 1997. https://arxiv.org/abs/funct-an/9604008

  34. [42]

    Rotational KMS states and type I conformal nets

    Roberto Longo and Yoh Tanimoto. Rotational KMS states and type I conformal nets. Comm. Math. Phys. , 357(1):249--266, 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.08903

  35. [43]

    Categories for the working mathematician , volume 5 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics

    Saunders Mac Lane. Categories for the working mathematician , volume 5 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4721-8

  36. [44]

    Two-dimensional conformal field theory, full vertex algebra and current-current deformation

    Yuto Moriwaki. Two-dimensional conformal field theory, full vertex algebra and current-current deformation. Adv. Math. , 427:Paper No. 109125, 74, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07327

  37. [45]

    Conformal covariance and the split property

    Vincenzo Morinelli, Yoh Tanimoto, and Mih\'aly Weiner. Conformal covariance and the split property. Comm. Math. Phys. , 357(1):379--406, 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.02196

  38. [46]

    Algebraic number theory , volume 322 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]

    J\"urgen Neukirch. Algebraic number theory , volume 322 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences] . Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03983-0

  39. [47]

    Module categories, weak H opf algebras and modular invariants

    Victor Ostrik. Module categories, weak H opf algebras and modular invariants . Transform. Groups , 8(2):177--206, 2003. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0111139

  40. [48]

    K.-H. Rehren. Bounded B ose fields. Lett. Math. Phys. , 40(4):299--306, 1997. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9605156

  41. [49]

    K.-H. Rehren. Chiral observables and modular invariants. Comm. Math. Phys. , 208(3):689--712, 2000. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9903262

  42. [50]

    Topological and conformal field theory as F robenius algebras

    Ingo Runkel, Jens Fjelstad, J\" u rgen Fuchs, and Christoph Schweigert. Topological and conformal field theory as F robenius algebras. In Categories in algebra, geometry and mathematical physics , volume 431 of Contemp. Math. , pages 225--247. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI,...

  43. [51]

    The definition of conformal field theory

    Graeme Segal. The definition of conformal field theory. In Topology, geometry and quantum field theory , volume 308 of London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser. , pages 421--577. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526398

  44. [52]

    Categorification and correlation functions in conformal field theory

    Christoph Schweigert, J\"urgen Fuchs, and Ingo Runkel. Categorification and correlation functions in conformal field theory. In International C ongress of M athematicians. V ol. III , pages 443--458. Eur. Math. Soc., Z\"urich, 2006. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0602079

  45. [53]

    R. F. Streater and A. S. Wightman. P CT , spin and statistics, and all that . Princeton Landmarks in Physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2000. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1cx3vcq

  46. [54]

    Fusion of positive energy representations of LSpin(2n)

    Valerio Toledano Laredo. Fusion of positive energy representations of LSpin(2n) . 1997. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0409044

  47. [55]

    Operator algebras and conformal field theory

    Antony Wassermann. Operator algebras and conformal field theory. III . F usion of positive energy representations of LSU(N) using bounded operators. Invent. Math. , 133(3):467--538, 1998. https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9806031

  48. [56]

    On the existence of regular vectors

    Christoph Zellner. On the existence of regular vectors. In Representation theory---current trends and perspectives , EMS Ser. Congr. Rep., pages 747--763. Eur. Math. Soc., Z\"urich, 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1510.08727

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.