Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

MINDS: The very low-mass star and brown dwarf sample. Detections and trends in the inner disk gas

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The inner disks of very low-mass stars and brown dwarfs are systematically hydrocarbon-dominated, and their carbon-to-oxygen ratio appears to rise with disk age.

desk verdict A credible sample-level survey showing VLMS and brown dwarf inner disks are hydrocarbon-dominated, with trends that are real but qualitative. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.02748 v1 pith:TW53OE3D submitted 2025-06-03 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR

A. M. Arabhavi , I. Kamp , Th. Henning , E. F. van Dishoeck , H. Jang , L. B. F. M. Waters , V. Christiaens , D. Gasman
show 17 more authors
I. Pascucci G. Perotti S. L. Grant M. Güdel P.-O. Lagage D. Barrado A. Caratti o Garatti F. Lahuis T. Kaeufer J. Kanwar M. Morales-Calderón K. Schwarz A. D. Sellek B. Tabone M. Temmink M. Vlasblom P. Patapis
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords protoplanetarydisksverylow-massstarsbrowndwarfsJWSTMIRIspectroscopydiskchemistryhydrocarbonsC/Oratioevolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to establish that the inner regions of planet-forming disks around the smallest stars and brown dwarfs are regularly carbon-dominated. It analyzes ten JWST MIRI spectra of disks around objects of 0.02 to 0.14 solar masses spanning roughly 1 to 10 Myr, reporting detection rates rather than individual model fits. Acetylene and hydrogen cyanide appear in every source, larger hydrocarbons such as diacetylene and benzene in nearly all, while carbon dioxide, water, and carbon monoxide are firmly detected in 90%, 50%, and 20% of the sample. The authors show that hydrocarbon detections cluster together and anti-correlate with inorganic molecules, that hydrocarbon-rich sources have weaker 10 um silicate emission and lower outer-disk dust masses, and that the carbon-to-oxygen ratio appears to rise with disk age. If true, the composition of rocky planets forming around these common stars would start from carbon-rich, water-poor gas, and disk evolution would be governed by rapid inward solid transport and grain growth.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing observable is the ratio F_13CCH2/F_C2H2, the integrated fluxes of the rare-isotope and main-isotope Q-branches of acetylene near 13.7 um. At high column density the ordinary C2H2 emission saturates while 13CCH2 remains optically thinner, so the ratio increases with the column of gas probed, provided the C-12/C-13 ratio is uniform. The paper uses this ratio as its main axis for nearly all trends and combines it with F_CO2/F_C2H2, F_H2O/F_C2H2, the 9.8 um dust strength, millimeter dust mass, stellar luminosity, and the 13CO2/13CCH2 ratio; the last of these, grouped by star-forming region, carries the age trend.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be to fit full slab-model or retrieval column densities for a subset of these sources and measure the C-12/C-13 ratio independently, for example from millimeter isotopologue lines of CO or HCN; if F_13CCH2/F_C2H2 does not rise monotonically with the retrieved C2H2 column, or if the isotope ratio varies between sources, the reported column-depth trends and the implied C/O-age trend would be partly fractionation artifacts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the carbon-rich inner disk seen earlier in individual objects is a systematic property of very low-mass star and brown dwarf disks, not a curiosity. In the ten-object sample, C2H2 and HCN are detected in all sources, C4H2 in nine and C6H6 in eight, and more than 80% of the detected molecules contain carbon. Oxygen carriers are present but subordinate: CO2 in nine sources, H2O in five, and CO in two. The paper introduces the F_13CCH2/F_C2H2 flux ratio as a qualitative measure of gas column depth; against this axis, sources with deeper probing show more hydrocarbon species, weaker 9.8 um dust features, lower outer-disk dust masses, lower stellar luminosities, and weaker CO2 and H2O relative to acetylene. Differences across star-forming regions line up with age in the sense that older regions appear more carbon-rich, which the paper interprets as tentative evidence that the C/O ratio in the emitting layers increases with disk age, consistent with rapid inward transport of solids and grain growth.

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the F_13CCH2/F_C2H2 flux ratio tracks how deep the mid-infrared sees into the disk gas, which holds only if the carbon isotope ratio is uniform across the disk; ultraviolet shielding or chemical fractionation could change the ratio without any change in column density.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The detection of acetylene and hydrogen cyanide in all ten disks, and larger hydrocarbons in nearly all, makes the carbon-rich inner disk the rule rather than the exception for stars below roughly 0.15 solar masses.
  • Because rocky planets form most frequently around such stars, planets assembled in these inner regions would inherit carbon-rich, water-poor gas, shifting predicted planet compositions toward carbon-rich refractory material.
  • The anti-correlation between hydrocarbon and inorganic molecule detections implies that water-bearing and hydrocarbon-dominated spectra represent two distinct disk states, with the hydrocarbon state becoming more common as disks age.
  • Disks with deeper probed hydrocarbon columns have weaker 10 um silicate features and lower millimeter dust masses, linking inner carbon enrichment to outer-disk dust depletion through grain growth and inward drift.
  • If the age trend holds, older disks such as those in Upper Sco and the TW Hya association should be systematically more carbon-rich than younger disks in Chamaeleon I and Taurus, making the C/O ratio a rough disk clock.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: applying the same F_13CCH2/F_C2H2 proxy to a matched sample of higher-mass T Tauri disks should give systematically lower ratios; a carbon-rich inner disk at T Tauri masses would require a different mechanism or a much longer timescale.
  • Editorial inference: a direct test would measure C-12/C-13 from millimeter isotopologue lines in the same sources; if the isotope ratio varies between disks, part of the reported age trend in the infrared ratio is chemical fractionation rather than deeper probing.
  • Editorial inference: if inward transport drives the carbon enrichment, the carbon-rich phase should coincide with measurable depletion of the innermost rocky solids, which future ALMA pebble-flux measurements or refractory-mineral observations could separate from carbon-grain-destruction scenarios.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents JWST MIRI/MRS spectra of 10 disks around very low-mass stars and brown dwarfs (0.02–0.14 M_sun) in Taurus, Chamaeleon, Upper Sco, and TW Hya, and derives molecular detection rates, flux-ratio trends, and a tentative evolutionary C/O-enhancement scenario. The central claims are that the inner disks are extremely molecular-rich, with C2H2 and HCN detected in all sources and larger hydrocarbons in nearly all; that hydrocarbon-rich sources have weaker 10 um dust features and lower millimeter-derived dust masses; and that the observed trends are consistent with rapid inward solid transport and grain growth. The analysis uses the F13CCH2/FC2H2 flux ratio as a proxy for the column of gas probed, relates this ratio to dust strength, dust mass, luminosity, and oxygen-bearing molecule fluxes, and interprets the source ordering in terms of disk age across star-forming regions.

Significance. If the results hold, this is the first systematic MIRI census of the inner-disk gas of very low-mass objects and would establish that hydrocarbon-dominated inner disks are common rather than rare, with implications for the C/O budget of planets forming around M dwarfs and brown dwarfs. The paper's strengths include a well-defined sample spanning several star-forming regions, cross-checks against Spitzer spectra, displayed continuum-subtracted spectra for many detections in Appendix C, and an unusually candid discussion of caveats, including the isotopic-fractionation limitation of the column proxy and the age diversity within star-forming regions. The detection-rate statistics and the qualitative consistency with the Mah et al. (2023) transport models are useful even if the evolutionary interpretation is tentative. The central limitations are that the main ordering quantity is an uncalibrated isotopologue ratio and that the age trend relies on canonical region ages; both are explicitly acknowledged in the text but remain load-bearing for the conclusions.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sect. 4.1, Figs. 5, 6, 8] The monotonic interpretation of F13CCH2/FC2H2 as a column-depth proxy is not calibrated. The paper itself concedes that preferential UV shielding or chemical fractionation could change the local 12C/13C ratio and that the observed ratio range could be partly due to these processes. Since this ratio is the independent variable in the central cross-sample trends and the x-axis of the age plot, the authors should either validate the proxy with slab-model or radiative-transfer grids spanning plausible temperatures, columns, and emitting areas, or demonstrate that the trends survive when an independent column indicator is used. The J1558 case, which is C2H2-bright but shows a very low isotopologue ratio, illustrates that the ratio cannot be interpreted as a simple column tracer without additional modeling.
  2. [Sect. 5.1, Fig. 8] The claimed C/O enhancement with age is anchored to the canonical ages of the star-forming regions and moving groups, even though the paper cites Ratzenböck et al. (2023) showing substantial age diversity within regions and explicitly notes that environmental differences such as the elevated UV field in Upper Sco could influence the trend. Because conclusion item 6 states this as tentative evidence, the authors should show how the ordering changes under alternative age assignments (for example, ChaI at ~4 Myr instead of 1–2 Myr) or should downgrade the language from evidence to consistency with model predictions.
  3. [Sect. 3 and Appendix C] The detection inventory for NC1 and TW A27 is adopted from Morales-Calderón et al. (subm.) and Patapis et al. (subm.), and part of the J1605 detections from Kanwar et al. (subm.), none of which are publicly available at the time of writing. Because the detection rates are a central result, the manuscript should either include the relevant continuum-subtracted spectra and detection criteria for these sources in an appendix or clearly state that the companion papers are available as part of the peer-review process. Without this, the reader cannot independently verify the most novel claims, such as C2H2 and HCN in all sources.
  4. [Sect. 2.3 and Appendix A] All measured line fluxes, dust strengths, and upper limits depend on the two Savitzky-Golay continuum definitions, but no sensitivity test is shown for the choice of filter widths. Since several of the features are weak or flat-topped and the paper's trends are built from ratios of these fluxes, a short test varying the narrow and broad continuum widths (for example, by ±30%) should be added to demonstrate that the reported anti-correlations in Figs. 5 and 6 are not continuum artifacts.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sect. 4.1] The integration windows for F13CCH2 and FC2H2 are defined, but no uncertainty from the window placement is provided; a brief statement on how sensitive the ratios are to the window boundaries would help.
  2. [Fig. 5 caption] The statement that all errorbars are 1-sigma with an assumed SNR of 100 is very coarse, and the method for computing 1-sigma upper limits for non-detections is not described; please specify the upper-limit prescription.
  3. [Sect. 5.1] The sentence beginning "Moreover, switching the ratios on either axes no trend was observed" is grammatically incomplete and should be rephrased.
  4. [Appendix B] There is a typo in the phrase "Spitzerspecrta" near the start of Appendix B.
  5. [Table 1] The extinction value for J0438 is described in the text as an upper limit because of the high inclination, but the table lists Av=2.8 without a symbol; please add an inequality or footnote.
  6. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption says the spectra are ordered by increasing F13CCH2/FC2H2, but J0438 is excluded from the ratio-ordering in Sect. 4.2 and appears first in the figure; clarify the ordering convention.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the sample trends are direct flux-ratio observables; the column-density proxy is an explicit assumption with acknowledged degeneracies, not a fitted input, and the model comparisons are qualitative.

full rationale

The paper's central quantities (F13CCH2/FC2H2, FCO2/FC2H2, FH2O/FC2H2, F9.8, Mdust) are measured integrated fluxes and literature-based dust masses, not parameters fitted to the claims they support. No 'prediction' is obtained by inverting a fit: the paper explicitly declines slab-model retrieval and states that quantitative comparison with models is future work. The F13CCH2/FC2H2 ratio is introduced as a qualitative monotonic proxy for the column density probed, under stated assumptions (uniform 12C/13C, co-spatial isotopologues); the paper itself concedes that UV shielding or chemical fractionation could drive part of the observed ratio range. This is a degenerate interpretation, not a by-construction equivalence: the ratio is a direct observable, and the trends in Figs. 5, 6, and 8 remain empirical correlations even if the column-density interpretation were wrong. The age trend relies on external, literature region ages, with the caveat that individual ages are uncertain and that recent work shows age diversity within regions (Ratzenböck et al. 2023), so age is not derived from the same data. The model-consistency statements (Mah et al. 2023; Pinilla et al. 2013) are qualitative and explicitly labeled as such ("these comparisons are qualitative, and a more quantitative comparison... is required"). Self-citations (Tabone et al. 2023; Arabhavi et al. 2024; Kanwar et al. 2024; Perotti et al. 2025) are used for spectral identifications and individual-source notes, but the MIRI spectra are shown in the paper and the detection rates are catalogued from these same data; the cited works provide externally published analyses, not an unverified uniqueness argument that forces the paper's conclusions. No renaming of a known result or imported uniqueness theorem is present. The weakest point, the uncalibrated isotopologue flux-ratio proxy, is a robustness and interpretation risk for the scientific claims, not a circularity under the stated criteria.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central trends rest on three interpretive ladders: the isotopologue flux-ratio proxy for gas column depth (Sect. 4.1), the region-age proxy for disk age (Sect. 5.1), and the adopted detection sets from previous and companion papers (Appendix C). Analysis windows and the uniform SNR=100 assumption are hand-chosen but conservative. No new entities are invented; consistency with Mah et al. (2023) and Kanwar et al. (2024) is a same-team model comparison, not an external benchmark.

free parameters (4)
  • F13CCH2/FC2H2 integration windows = 13.698-13.723 um and 13.723-13.734 um
    Hand-chosen band-head windows (Sect. 4.1, Fig. 1 middle panels) defining the paper's core column-depth proxy; every trend in Figs. 5 and 6 is ordered by this ratio.
  • Savitzky-Golay continuum filter widths = not specified here; procedure from Temmink et al. 2024
    Broad and narrow widths are chosen by hand (Sect. 2.3, Fig. A.2) to separate dust continuum, molecular pseudo-continuum, and line fluxes; the dust strength F9.8 and all line fluxes depend on this split, and the downward-spike masking is skipped for VLMS.
  • Assumed SNR for error bars and upper limits = 100
    Lower bound of the ETC-derived 100-270 range is adopted uniformly (Sect. 4.2); all 1-sigma error bars and upper limits in Figs. 5-6 scale with this assumption, with details in Jang et al. in prep.
  • CO2 and H2O line integration windows = CO2: 14.920-14.993 um; H2O: 16.654-16.673, 17.092-17.112, 17.354-17.363 um
    Hand-chosen windows (Sect. 4.2.3) for the flux-ratio trends; the paper notes underlying hydrocarbon emission can contaminate the H2O windows, which explains scatter in panel D of Fig. 5.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption F13CCH2/FC2H2 is a monotonic proxy for the gas column depth probed by MIRI, with uniform 12C/13C fractionation and co-spatial isotopologue emission.
    Sect. 4.1 anchors Figures 5 and 6; the paper acknowledges fractionation could produce the trends.
  • domain assumption Disk age can be approximated by the canonical age of the host star-forming region or moving group.
    Sect. 5.1 and Fig. 8 use region ages (Chameleon I 1-2 Myr, Taurus 1-3 Myr, Upper Sco 5-10 Myr, TWA 7-13 Myr); Ratzenbock et al. (2023) show within-region age diversity.
  • domain assumption Interstellar 12C/13C of about 70 applies to the emitting disk gas.
    Sect. 5.1: the slope-unity relation in Fig. 8, F13CO2/F13CCH2 = 0.5 times FCO2/FC2H2, assumes this ISM fractionation ratio (Woods & Willacy 2009).
  • domain assumption Detections for six of ten sources are adopted as reported in prior or companion papers, some unpublished.
    Appendix C: J0438 (Perotti et al. 2025), NC1 (Morales-Calderon et al. subm.), IC147 (Arabhavi et al. 2024), Sz28 (Kanwar et al. 2024), TW A27 (Patapis et al. subm.), J1605 (Tabone et al. 2023; Kanwar et al. subm.).
  • ad hoc to paper The dual-width continuum definition reliably separates dust continuum from molecular pseudo-continuum for all sources.
    Sect. 2.3: line-rich VLMS spectra make this separation difficult, so the paper skips the standard downward-spike masking; the dust-strength vs gas-depth anti-correlation could be partly shaped by this choice.
  • domain assumption Extinction corrections do not affect the molecular flux ratio trends.
    Sect. 2.4: molecular lines lie in a narrow wavelength range separated from silicate features, so the paper states extinction accuracy does not affect conclusions. Listed for completeness.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of MINDS: The very low-mass star and brown dwarf sample. Detections and trends in the inner disk gas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TW53OE3D

@misc{pith2026250602748,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: MINDS: The very low-mass star and brown dwarf sample. Detections and trends in the inner disk gas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TW53OE3D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.02748}
}
abstract

Planet-forming disks around brown dwarfs and very low-mass stars (VLMS) are on average less massive and are expected to undergo faster radial solid transport than their higher mass counterparts. Spitzer had detected C$_2$H$_2$, CO$_2$ and HCN around these objects. With better sensitivity and spectral resolving power, JWST recently revealed incredibly carbon-rich spectra from such disks. A study of a larger sample of objects is necessary to understand how common such carbon-rich inner disk regions are and to put constraints on their evolution. We present and analyze MIRI observations of 10 disks around VLMS from the MIRI GTO program. This sample is diverse, with the central object ranging in mass from 0.02 to 0.14 $M_{\odot}$. They are located in three star-forming regions and a moving group (1-10 Myr). We identify molecular emission in all sources and report detection rates. We compare the molecular flux ratios between different species and to dust emission strengths. We also compare the flux ratios with the stellar and disk properties. The spectra of these VLMS disks are extremely molecular rich, and we detect the 10 $\mu$m silicate dust emission feature in 70% of the sample. We detect C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN in all of the sources and find larger hydrocarbons such as C$_4$H$_2$ and C$_6$H$_6$ in nearly all sources. Among O-bearing molecules, we find firm detections of CO$_2$, H$_2$O, and CO in 90%, 50%, and 20% of the sample, respectively. We find that the detection rates of organic molecules correlate with other organic molecules and anti-correlate with inorganic molecules. Hydrocarbon-rich sources show a weaker 10$\mu$m dust strength as well as lower disk dust mass than the oxygen-rich sources. We find potential evidence for C/O enhancement with disk age. The observed trends are consistent with models that suggest rapid inward solid material transport and grain growth.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.02748 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Summary of dust and gas observations. The left panels show continuum-normalized dust strengths highlighting SiO2, enstatite, and forsterite emission features. The middle panels show a zoom in on the observed C2H2 features highlighting four peaks corresponding to the main and rare isotopologues in red and blue respectively. The right panels show the continuum-subtracted hydrocarbon-rich wavelength region of the spect… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Summary of dust and gas detections in the sample. Green square refers to a firm detection, yellow indicates a tentative detection and light gray square indicates a non-detection. The top panel shows the number of detections for each species. The right panel shows the number of species of two groups detected in each source. The inorganic species (dark gray) includes H2, H2O, HI, CO, CO2, 13CO2, [Ne II], and OH. The o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison of the 10 µm dust feature of NC1 (VLMS) and SY Cha (T Tauri). Here the continuum normalised flux is shown. The ob￾served MIRI spectrum of SY Cha is taken from Schwarz et al. (2024). ure D.1 shows the binary correlation coefficients ϕ (Yule 1912) and the p-values between the species detected in the sample. A strong correlation between a molecule pair implies that it is more probable for both molecules to b… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Trends in the MIRI observations. Panels A-D show the num￾ber of hydrocarbons (CnHm) detected, integrated dust strength, the CO2 to C2H2 flux ratios, and the H2O to C2H2 flux ratios against the flux ratio F13CCH2 /FC2H2 , along with the errorbars. The molecules with ten…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Trends in stellar and disk properties. Panels A-C show the dust mass (estimated from 0.89 mm continuum fluxes), stellar luminosity, and mass accretion rate against the flux ratio F13CCH2 /FC2H2 . the sensitivity of MIRI also decreases, leading to high noise lev￾els. In…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Luminosities of the central object against oxygen bearing molecules in the inner disks. The colored boxes refer to the oxygen￾bearing molecules detected in the MIRI spectra of each source, in￾dicated in the legend. Tentative detections are highlighted by white crosses.…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Variation of flux ratios FCO2 /FC2H2 and F13CO2 /F13CCH2 across different star-forming regions or moving group. We include Sz114 (Xie et al. 2023). The dashed line indicates a line with slope of unity. Due to the non-detections of both 13CO2 and 13CCH2 in J0438, we pre…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Cartoon illustrating the role of dust opacity on the mid-IR spectral appearance. The dotted line represents the τdust=1 layer. Cyan, pink, and orange ellipses represent the H2O, CO2, and the two C2H2 reservoirs. The arrows show the direction of increase in the quantity…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sign-resolved nanoscale readout and control of hidden antiferromagnetic spin order

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    Observation of the optical nonlinear anomalous Hall effect in CuMnAs allows nanoscale readout of antiferromagnetic Néel vector orientation via light-induced photocurrent polarity.

  2. Spectroscopy of Free-Floating Planetary-Mass Objects and their disks with JWST

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Six of eight young free-floating planetary-mass objects observed with JWST show silicate emission from disks, one shows photospheric silicate absorption, and several show hydrocarbon emission lines.

  3. A Chemical Inventory of the Disk around the Class 0 Protostar L1527 IRS with ALMA

    astro-ph.GA 2026-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A comprehensive ALMA-based chemical inventory of the Class 0 protostar L1527 IRS finds 39 molecular species and a carbon-rich to oxygen-rich transition from envelope to disk.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    M., Rosenfeld , K

    Andrews , S. M., Rosenfeld , K. A., Kraus , A. L., & Wilner , D. J. 2013, , 771, 129

    2013

  4. [4]

    2015, , 582, A105

    Antonellini , S., Kamp , I., Riviere-Marichalar , P., et al. 2015, , 582, A105

    2015

  5. [5]

    2005, Science, 310, 834

    Apai , D., Pascucci , I., Bouwman , J., et al. 2005, Science, 310, 834

    2005

  6. [6]

    M., Kamp , I., Henning , T., et al

    Arabhavi , A. M., Kamp , I., Henning , T., et al. 2024, Science, 384, 1086

    2024

  7. [7]

    M., Kamp , I., van Dishoeck , E

    Arabhavi , A. M., Kamp , I., van Dishoeck , E. F., et al. 2025, , 984, L62

    2025

  8. [8]

    R., et al

    Argyriou , I., Glasse , A., Law , D. R., et al. 2023, , 675, A111

    2023

Show all 100 references
  1. [9]

    A., Carpenter , J

    Barenfeld , S. A., Carpenter , J. M., Ricci , L., & Isella , A. 2016, , 827, 142

    2016

  2. [10]

    2000, , 538, 363

    Basri , G., Mohanty , S., Allard , F., et al. 2000, , 538, 363

    2000

  3. [11]

    D., Bergin , E

    Bosman , A. D., Bergin , E. A., Calahan , J., & Duval , S. E. 2022, , 930, L26

    2022

  4. [12]

    2021, , 656, A72

    Burn , R., Schlecker , M., Mordasini , C., et al. 2021, , 656, A72

    2021

  5. [13]

    2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline , Zenodo

    Bushouse , H., Eisenhamer , J., Dencheva , N., et al. 2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline , Zenodo

    2023

  6. [14]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, , 345, 245

    1989

  7. [15]

    2023, The Journal of Open Source Software, 8, 4774

    Christiaens , V., Gonzalez , C., Farkas , R., et al. 2023, The Journal of Open Source Software, 8, 4774

    2023

  8. [16]

    2024, MINDS: Hybrid pipeline for the reduction of JWST/MIRI-MRS data , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2403.007

    Christiaens , V., Samland , M., Gasman , D., Temmink , M., & Perotti , G. 2024, MINDS: Hybrid pipeline for the reduction of JWST/MIRI-MRS data , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2403.007

    2024

  9. [17]

    J., Bergin , E

    Colmenares , M. J., Bergin , E. A., Salyk , C., et al. 2024, , 977, 173

    2024

  10. [18]

    2022, pybaselines: A Python library of algorithms for the baseline correction of experimental data

    Erb, D. 2022, pybaselines: A Python library of algorithms for the baseline correction of experimental data

    2022

  11. [19]

    E., Henning , T., Jayawardhana , R., & Oliveira , J

    Fedele , D., van den Ancker , M. E., Henning , T., Jayawardhana , R., & Oliveira , J. M. 2010, , 510, A72

    2010

  12. [20]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.13714

    Flagg , L., Scholz , A., Almendros-Abad , V., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.13714

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2021, , 649, A1

    2021

  14. [22]

    F., Grant , S

    Gasman , D., van Dishoeck , E. F., Grant , S. L., et al. 2023, , 679, A117

    2023

  15. [23]

    A., Wertz , O., Absil , O., et al

    Gomez Gonzalez , C. A., Wertz , O., Absil , O., et al. 2017, , 154, 7

    2017

  16. [24]

    D., Clayton , G

    Gordon , K. D., Clayton , G. C., Decleir , M., et al. 2023, , 950, 86

    2023

  17. [25]

    L., van Dishoeck , E

    Grant , S. L., van Dishoeck , E. F., Tabone , B., et al. 2023, , 947, L6

    2023

  18. [26]

    J., Kamp , I., Waters , L

    Greenwood , A. J., Kamp , I., Waters , L. B. F. M., Woitke , P., & Thi , W. F. 2019, , 631, A81

    2019

  19. [27]

    J., Kamp , I., Waters , L

    Greenwood , A. J., Kamp , I., Waters , L. B. F. M., et al. 2017, , 601, A44

    2017

  20. [28]

    R., Arzner , K., et al

    G \"u del , M., Briggs , K. R., Arzner , K., et al. 2007, , 468, 353

    2007

  21. [29]

    Heinzeller , D., Nomura , H., Walsh , C., & Millar , T. J. 2011, , 731, 115

    2011

  22. [30]

    2024, , 136, 054302

    Henning , T., Kamp , I., Samland , M., et al. 2024, , 136, 054302

    2024

  23. [31]

    Henning , T. K. & Krasnokutski , S. A. 2019, Nature Astronomy, 3, 568

    2019

  24. [32]

    Herczeg , G. J. & Hillenbrand , L. A. 2008, , 681, 594

    2008

  25. [33]

    Herczeg , G. J. & Hillenbrand , L. A. 2014, , 786, 97

    2014

  26. [34]

    Kaeufer , T., Min , M., Woitke , P., Kamp , I., & Arabhavi , A. M. 2024 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.06486

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    2024 b , , 690, A100

    Kaeufer , T., Woitke , P., Kamp , I., Kanwar , J., & Min , M. 2024 b , , 690, A100

    2024

  28. [36]

    2023, , 954, 66

    Kalyaan , A., Pinilla , P., Krijt , S., et al. 2023, , 954, 66

    2023

  29. [37]

    M., et al

    Kamp , I., Henning , T., Arabhavi , A. M., et al. 2023, Faraday Discussions, 245, 112

    2023

  30. [38]

    F., Woitke , P., et al

    Kamp , I., Thi , W. F., Woitke , P., et al. 2017, , 607, A41

    2017

  31. [39]

    2024, , 689, A231

    Kanwar , J., Kamp , I., Jang , H., et al. 2024, , 689, A231

    2024

  32. [40]

    E., Dullemond , C

    Kessler-Silacci , J. E., Dullemond , C. P., Augereau , J. C., et al. 2007, , 659, 680

    2007

  33. [41]

    J., Goes , C., et al

    Lebouteiller , V., Barry , D. J., Goes , C., et al. 2015, , 218, 21

    2015

  34. [42]

    J., Spoon , H

    Lebouteiller , V., Barry , D. J., Spoon , H. W. W., et al. 2011, , 196, 8

    2011

  35. [43]

    L., Bitsch , B., & Henning , T

    Lienert , J. L., Bitsch , B., & Henning , T. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.09342

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    2020, , 638, A88

    Liu , B., Lambrechts , M., Johansen , A., Pascucci , I., & Henning , T. 2020, , 638, A88

    2020

  37. [45]

    2019, , 623, A106

    Liu , Y., Pascucci , I., & Henning , T. 2019, , 623, A106

    2019

  38. [46]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.05535

    Long , F., Pascucci , I., Houge , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.05535

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Luhman , K. L. 2007, , 173, 104

    2007

  40. [48]

    Luhman , K. L. 2012, , 50, 65

    2012

  41. [49]

    L., Adame , L., D'Alessio , P., et al

    Luhman , K. L., Adame , L., D'Alessio , P., et al. 2007, , 666, 1219

    2007

  42. [50]

    2023, , 677, L7

    Mah , J., Bitsch , B., Pascucci , I., & Henning , T. 2023, , 677, L7

    2023

  43. [51]

    2024, , 686, L17

    Mah , J., Savvidou , S., & Bitsch , B. 2024, , 686, L17

    2024

  44. [52]

    F., Ansdell , M., Rosotti , G

    Manara , C. F., Ansdell , M., Rosotti , G. P., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka , Y. Aikawa , T. Muto , K. Tomida , & M. Tamura , 539

    2023

  45. [53]

    F., Fedele , D., Herczeg , G

    Manara , C. F., Fedele , D., Herczeg , G. J., & Teixeira , P. S. 2016, , 585, A136

    2016

  46. [54]

    F., Robberto , M., Da Rio , N., et al

    Manara , C. F., Robberto , M., Da Rio , N., et al. 2012, , 755, 154

    2012

  47. [55]

    F., Testi , L., Herczeg , G

    Manara , C. F., Testi , L., Herczeg , G. J., et al. 2017, , 604, A127

    2017

  48. [56]

    2024, , 167, 168

    Manjavacas , E., Tremblin , P., Birkmann , S., et al. 2024, , 167, 168

    2024

  49. [57]

    L., Brice \ n o , C., Hartmann , L., & Calvet , N

    Muzerolle , J., Luhman , K. L., Brice \ n o , C., Hartmann , L., & Calvet , N. 2005, , 625, 906

    2005

  50. [58]

    A., Rappaport , S

    Nelson , L. A., Rappaport , S. A., & Joss , P. C. 1986, , 311, 226

    1986

  51. [59]

    2009, , 696, 143

    Pascucci , I., Apai , D., Luhman , K., et al. 2009, , 696, 143

    2009

  52. [60]

    S., & Bruderer , S

    Pascucci , I., Herczeg , G., Carr , J. S., & Bruderer , S. 2013, , 779, 178

    2013

  53. [61]

    J., et al

    Pascucci , I., Testi , L., Herczeg , G. J., et al. 2016, , 831, 125

    2016

  54. [62]

    T., Henning , T., et al

    Perotti , G., Kurtovic , N. T., Henning , T., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.11424

    2025

  55. [63]

    2013, , 554, A95

    Pinilla , P., Birnstiel , T., Benisty , M., et al. 2013, , 554, A95

    2013

  56. [64]

    E., Alves , J., et al

    Ratzenb \"o ck , S., Gro schedl , J. E., Alves , J., et al. 2023, , 678, A71

    2023

  57. [65]

    M., Padgett , D

    Rebull , L. M., Padgett , D. L., McCabe , C. E., et al. 2010, , 186, 259

    2010

  58. [66]

    & Gizis , J

    Riaz , B. & Gizis , J. E. 2008, , 681, 1584

    2008

  59. [67]

    2017, , 154, 24

    Ricci , L., Cazzoletti , P., Czekala , I., et al. 2017, , 154, 24

    2017

  60. [68]

    L., Barman , T., Mclean , I

    Rice , E. L., Barman , T., Mclean , I. S., Prato , L., & Kirkpatrick , J. D. 2010, , 186, 63

    2010

  61. [69]

    H., Wright, G., B \"o ker, T., et al

    Rieke, G. H., Wright, G., B \"o ker, T., et al. 2015, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac., 127, 584

    2015

  62. [70]

    2021, , 653, A114

    Sabotta , S., Schlecker , M., Chaturvedi , P., et al. 2021, , 653, A114

    2021

  63. [71]

    2006, , 645, 1498

    Scholz , A., Jayawardhana , R., & Wood , K. 2006, , 645, 1498

    2006

  64. [72]

    R., Henning , T., Christiaens , V., et al

    Schwarz , K. R., Henning , T., Christiaens , V., et al. 2024, , 962, 8

    2024

  65. [73]

    D., Vlasblom , M., & van Dishoeck , E

    Sellek , A. D., Vlasblom , M., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.01895

    2024 arXiv

  66. [74]

    F., et al

    Tabone , B., Bettoni , G., van Dishoeck , E. F., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 805

    2023

  67. [75]

    F., Grant , S

    Temmink , M., van Dishoeck , E. F., Grant , S. L., et al. 2024, , 686, A117

    2024

  68. [76]

    F., et al

    Testi , L., Natta , A., Manara , C. F., et al. 2022, , 663, A98

    2022

  69. [77]

    & Pinilla , P

    van der Marel , N. & Pinilla , P. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2310.09077

    2023 arXiv

  70. [78]

    L., et al

    Vlasblom , M., Temmink , M., Grant , S. L., et al. 2025, , 693, A278

    2025

  71. [79]

    2018, , 155, 54

    Ward-Duong , K., Patience , J., Bulger , J., et al. 2018, , 155, 54

    2018

  72. [80]

    W., Glasse , A., et al

    Wells , M., Pel , J. W., Glasse , A., et al. 2015, , 127, 646

    2015

  73. [81]

    White , R. J. & Basri , G. 2003, , 582, 1109

    2003

  74. [82]

    M., Kamp , I., & Thi , W

    Woitke , P., Arabhavi , A. M., Kamp , I., & Thi , W. F. 2022, , 668, A164

    2022

  75. [83]

    H., et al

    Woitke , P., Helling , C., Hunter , G. H., et al. 2018 a , , 614, A1

    2018

  76. [84]

    F., et al

    Woitke , P., Min , M., Thi , W. F., et al. 2018 b , , 618, A57

    2018

  77. [85]

    F., Arabhavi , A

    Woitke , P., Thi , W. F., Arabhavi , A. M., et al. 2024, , 683, A219

    2024

  78. [86]

    Woods , P. M. & Willacy , K. 2007, , 655, L49

    2007

  79. [87]

    Woods , P. M. & Willacy , K. 2009, , 693, 1360

    2009

  80. [88]

    S., Rieke , G

    Wright , G. S., Rieke , G. H., Glasse , A., et al. 2023, , 135, 048003

    2023

  81. [89]

    S., Wright , D., Goodson , G

    Wright , G. S., Wright , D., Goodson , G. B., et al. 2015, , 127, 595

    2015

  82. [90]

    2023, , 959, L25

    Xie , C., Pascucci , I., Long , F., et al. 2023, , 959, L25

    2023

  83. [91]

    Yule, G. U. 1912, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 75, 579

    1912

  84. [92]

    1966, in Stellar Evolution, ed.\ R

    Baker, N. 1966, in Stellar Evolution, ed.\ R. F. Stein,& A. G. W. Cameron (Plenum, New York) 333

    1966

  85. [93]

    1988, A&A, 200, 58

    Balluch, M. 1988, A&A, 200, 58

    1988

  86. [94]

    Cox, J. P. 1980, Theory of Stellar Pulsation (Princeton University Press, Princeton) 165

    1980

  87. [95]

    N.,& Stewart, J

    Cox, A. N.,& Stewart, J. N. 1969, Academia Nauk, Scientific Information 15, 1

    1969

  88. [96]

    1980, Prog

    Mizuno H. 1980, Prog. Theor. Phys., 64, 544

    1980

  89. [97]

    Tscharnuter W. M. 1987, A&A, 188, 55

    1987

  90. [98]

    1992, in ASP Conf

    Terlevich, R. 1992, in ASP Conf. Ser. 31, Relationships between Active Galactic Nuclei and Starburst Galaxies, ed. A. V. Filippenko, 13

    1992

  91. [99]

    Yorke, H. W. 1980a, A&A, 86, 286

  92. [100]

    F., Tytler, D

    Zheng, W., Davidsen, A. F., Tytler, D. & Kriss, G. A. 1997, preprint

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.