Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Lonely Little Red Dots: Challenges to the AGN-nature of little red dots through their clustering and spectral energy distributions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that most little red dots are not AGN: BIC model comparison prefers non-AGN SEDs for 68% of 124 objects, and their fifth-nearest-neighbour densities are lower than those of galaxies.

desk verdict A useful new LRD sample, but the 'lonely' clustering signal is likely a photo-z artifact and the BIC preference is largely a parameter-count penalty; the paper overstates its case but deserves review. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.04004 v4 pith:CMTW3BBG submitted 2025-06-04 astro-ph.GA

María Carranza-Escudero , Christopher J. Conselice , Nathan Adams , Thomas Harvey , Duncan Austin , Peter Behroozi , Leonardo Ferreira , Katherine Ormerod
show 26 more authors
Qiao Duan James Trussler Qiong Li Lewi Westcott Rogier A. Windhorst Dan Coe Seth H. Cohen Cheng Cheng Simon P. Driver Brenda Frye Lukas J. Furtak Norman A. Grogin Nimish P. Hathi Rolf A. Jansen Anton M. Koekemoer Madeline A. Marshall Rosalia O'Brien Norbert Pirzkal Maria Polletta Aaron Robotham Michael J. Rutkowski Jake Summers Stephen M. Wilkins Christopher N. A. Willmer Haojing Yan Adi Zitrin
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords littlereddotsactivegalacticnucleispectralenergydistributionsgalaxyclusteringBayesianinformationcriterionhigh-redshiftgalaxiesJWSTsurveysstarclusterformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the compact red objects called little red dots (LRDs) seen by JWST are mostly active galactic nuclei (AGN) or something else. Using 124 photometrically selected LRDs at redshifts 3 to 10 across three deep survey fields, it compares spectral energy distribution (SED) models with and without an AGN component. A Bayesian information criterion (BIC), which penalises extra parameters, prefers the non-AGN model for 68% of the sample, and the preference grows when MIRI mid-infrared data are included. A nearest-neighbour clustering analysis finds that LRDs sit in lower-density neighbourhoods than ordinary galaxies, with two-sample test p-values of 0.044 and 0.014 in two redshift bins. The paper concludes that as a population LRDs are mostly compact galaxies or star clusters in formation, rather than AGN.

What carries the argument

Two measurements carry the argument. The first is a model-comparison exercise in which each LRD's SED is fitted twice, once with and once without a clumpy-torus AGN component, using a spectral energy distribution fitting code; the Bayesian information criterion, $\mathrm{BIC} = k\log N + \chi^2$, penalises the AGN model's three additional free parameters and is used instead of raw $\chi^2$ to judge overfitting. The second is a local-environment statistic, the fifth-nearest-neighbour surface density $\Sigma_5 = n/(\pi d_5^2)$, computed with a spatial tree over all objects within a redshift offset $\Delta z < 0.2$, then compared between LRDs and a robust galaxy sample with Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Anderson-Darling tests. Together these establish both parts of the conclusion: AGN templates are not needed to fit the light, and LRDs live in unusually sparse neighbourhoods.

What would settle it

Collect spectroscopic redshifts for a large fraction of the 124 LRDs and re-run the fifth-nearest-neighbour comparison and the BIC model comparison on the secure subsample; if the low-density signal and the non-AGN preference disappear with accurate redshifts, the paper's central conclusion would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the AGN interpretation of little red dots is not generally needed. Although adding an AGN component to an SED fit usually improves the raw $\chi^2$, the BIC penalty for the AGN model's extra free parameters makes the non-AGN model preferable for 84 of 124 LRDs (68%), and the preference is strongest in the field with MIRI coverage, where all LRDs favour non-AGN fits. The clustering evidence points the same way: LRDs have lower average fifth-nearest-neighbour surface densities than galaxies ($9.56$ versus $14.91\,\mathrm{cMpc}^{-2}$ at $4.75 < z < 6.5$, and $4.65$ versus $7.80\,\mathrm{cMpc}^{-2}$ at $6.5 < z < 8.25$), and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests give $p = 0.044$ and $p = 0.014$, a tentative but consistent signal that LRDs avoid dense environments. Abundance matching of their number density yields upper-limit halo masses and a roughly constant stellar-to-halo mass ratio near $10^{-1.4}$ across $3 < z < 11$. The paper therefore concludes that while the population may be a mixture, LRDs are mostly compact galaxies or star clusters in formation.

Load-bearing premise

The clustering conclusion assumes that the photometric redshifts of LRDs are good enough that the apparent emptiness of their neighbourhoods is real; the paper itself reports a 40% outlier fraction and an NMAD of 0.112 for LRD redshifts and says the impact on the density measurements is difficult to assess.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If most LRDs are compact galaxies or star clusters in formation, black-hole masses inferred from their broad H-alpha lines do not apply to the majority of the population, easing the reported tension between LRD black-hole masses and host stellar masses.
  • Dense environments appear to suppress the LRD phase, so LRD number density should decline with local overdensity; this is the first environmental signature of the population and a target for future wide-area surveys.
  • Because the BIC penalises the AGN model's extra parameters, AGN fractions quoted from raw $\chi^2$ improvements in LRD SED fitting are overestimates, especially for data without MIRI.
  • Abundance matching puts upper-limit halo masses in the roughly $10^{10}$-$10^{11}\,M_\odot$ range with a near-constant stellar-to-halo mass ratio of about $10^{-1.4}$, so LRDs are not as overmassive relative to their halos as earlier SED-only analyses suggested.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the environment result predicts that the LRD fraction among compact red sources should drop in overdense regions, so searching protocluster cores in wide-area surveys would test whether LRDs are truly excluded from them.
  • Beyond the paper, if LRDs are forming star clusters at $\sim 10^7\,M_\odot$, many should be short-lived and dissolve within a few hundred megayears; looking for compact, dense clusters at $z<3$ as their descendants is a testable extension.
  • Beyond the paper, the anti-correlation with density resembles formation channels that need low-metallicity gas, such as direct-collapse seeds; measuring metallicities or local enrichment around LRDs could separate those channels from ordinary star cluster formation.
  • Beyond the paper, the BIC result implies that re-analysing published LRD samples with a parameter penalty would lower the inferred AGN fraction and could change the estimated AGN luminosity function at $z\sim5$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper selects 124 little red dots (LRDs) from CEERS, NEP-TDF, and JADES NIRCam data and compares CIGALE SED fits with and without an AGN component, using BIC to argue that non-AGN models are preferred for most LRDs (68%), especially when MIRI data are included. It also measures the local environment of LRDs using the 5th-nearest-neighbor density Σ5 and, comparing with a robust galaxy sample via K-S and D-A tests, finds that LRD neighborhoods are less dense than galaxy neighborhoods (K-S p = 0.044 and 0.014 in the two redshift bins). Abundance matching is used to estimate upper limits on LRD halo masses and stellar-to-halo mass ratios. The paper concludes that most LRDs are likely compact galaxies or star clusters in formation rather than AGN.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the paper would be an important challenge to the widespread AGN interpretation of little red dots, with consequences for black hole demographics, reionization, and halo occupation at z~5. The paper has concrete strengths: a newly presented NEP-TDF LRD sample, careful attention to brown dwarf contaminants, broad-line measurements on 16 grating spectra that reproduce the known ~75-80% broad-line fraction, a transparent clustering methodology with edge masks and random-point comparisons, and abundance-matching estimates that are clearly labeled as upper limits. However, the two central pillars are both fragile: the BIC-based non-AGN preference is substantially driven by the parameter-count penalty, and the "lonely" clustering signal depends on photometric redshifts whose errors are much larger than the adopted redshift mask. The paper is therefore useful and thought-provoking, but the abstract's strong conclusion is not yet supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2.1, Eq. (9), and §3.5]
  2. [§4.1.3, Eq. (8), and Table 1]
  3. [§4.2.3 and §4.3]
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (5)]
  2. [§3.4 and §4.2]
  3. [§4.1.1 and Table 1]
  4. [§4.2.2]
  5. [§5.1]

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the SED, clustering, and halo-mass derivations are self-contained and do not reduce to their inputs.

full rationale

The paper's main derivations are (i) a CIGALE SED comparison scored with BIC, (ii) a nearest-neighbour Sigma5 clustering comparison with K-S and D-A tests, and (iii) halo-mass upper limits from abundance matching. None of these reduce to an input by construction. The BIC comparison uses Eq. 8 with stated parameter counts (8 for AGN, 5 for non-AGN) and reported chi-squared values; the parameter-count penalty is a standard model-selection device, not a fitted variable renamed as a prediction, so the 68% non-AGN preference is a transparent, reproducible statistic rather than a circular outcome. The clustering analysis follows the nearest-neighbour method of Li et al. (2025) and applies a stated Delta z < 0.2 mask; the poorer LRD photometric redshifts (NMAD = 0.112, eta ~ 40%) are explicitly reported in Sec. 3.5 and their impact is acknowledged as difficult to assess in Sec. 5.2, making this a correctness and robustness concern rather than a circularity. Self-citations to Conselice et al. (2024), Adams et al. (2024), and Li et al. (2025) support data reduction and methodological choices but are not used to forbid alternatives or to import a uniqueness theorem, and the central claims are tested against the data themselves (chi-squared, BIC, K-S p-values, random-point comparisons, and 20,000 random galaxy samples). Therefore no load-bearing step reduces, by the paper's own equations or by self-citation, to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a set of hand-tuned selection thresholds, the fidelity of SED templates, and the quality of photometric redshifts. No new physical entities are introduced. The halo mass estimates are explicitly upper limits and depend on abundance matching assumptions.

free parameters (6)
  • LRD color cuts red1/red2 = F115W-F150W<0.8, F200W-F277W>0.7, F200W-F356W>1.0 (red1); F150W-F200W<0.8, F277W-F356W>0.6, F277W-F444W>0.7 (red2)
    Selection thresholds adopted from Kokorev et al. 2024; the choice of cuts determines the sample and all downstream results.
  • Compactness ratio threshold = f_F444W(0.5")/f_F444W(0.32") < 1.4
    Chosen instead of the more common 0.4/0.2 aperture ratio <1.7; affects which objects are considered compact.
  • F200W-F410M color cut = >0.9
    Added post hoc to remove emission-line contaminants; removed 23 objects (~14%), and the threshold was chosen by inspecting the color distribution.
  • Brown dwarf chi^2 threshold = chi^2 < 20
    Used to reject brown dwarf contaminants; this specific threshold is a choice that removes 9 objects.
  • Redshift offset mask Delta z = <0.2
    Chosen to be larger than the LRD NMAD of 0.112; affects the nearest-neighbor search and clustering results.
  • BIC free parameter counts k = k=8 for AGN model, k=5 for non-AGN model
    The difference in parameter counts drives the BIC penalty and is central to the non-AGN preference.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Standard flat LCDM cosmology with H0=70, OmegaM=0.3, OmegaLambda=0.7
    Stated in Section 1 and used for all distance and volume calculations.
  • domain assumption EAZY photometric redshifts for LRDs are accurate enough for spatial analysis despite a 40% outlier fraction
    Invoked in Section 3.5 and 4.2.1; the redshift mask Delta z<0.2 is designed to absorb errors, but the accuracy remains a load-bearing premise.
  • domain assumption CIGALE templates (bc03, skirtor2016, dl2014) adequately represent LRD SEDs
    The BIC comparison depends entirely on the fidelity of these template sets; the paper acknowledges that other AGN models may give different shapes.
  • domain assumption The robust 4<z<9 galaxy sample is an appropriate control for environment comparisons
    The galaxy selection criteria from Li et al. 2025 are assumed to produce a fair comparison population; differing selection functions could bias the Sigma_5 comparison.
  • domain assumption Halo mass functions from Behroozi et al. 2013 and Tinker et al. 2008, and abundance matching, apply to LRDs
    Used in Section 4.3 to convert number densities to halo masses; the paper labels these as upper limits under the hypothesis that LRDs are galaxies.
  • domain assumption Sigma_5 (5th nearest-neighbor projected density) traces the relevant environment
    Standard method, but the choice of n=5 and the redshift window define the environment measure and therefore the clustering result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lonely Little Red Dots: Challenges to the AGN-nature of little red dots through their clustering and spectral energy distributions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CMTW3BBG

@misc{pith2026250604004,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lonely Little Red Dots: Challenges to the AGN-nature of little red dots through their clustering and spectral energy distributions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CMTW3BBG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.04004}
}
abstract

Observations with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) reveal a previously unseen population of compact red objects, known as ``little red dots`` (LRDs). We study a new photometrically selected sample of 124 LRDs in the redshift range $z$ $\sim$ 3 - 10 selected from NIRCam coverage of the CEERS, NEP-TDF, JADES and JEMS surveys. For JADES, the NEP-TDF and CEERS, we compare SED models with and without AGN components and analyse the impact of an AGN component on the goodness of fit using the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). We find that whilst the $\chi^{2}$ of the majority of models containing AGN components is improved compared to models without AGN components, we show that the BIC suggests models without AGN are a more appropriate fit to LRD SEDs, especially when MIRI data is available. We also measure LRD clustering in the CEERS field, JADES field, and NEP-TDF, where we compare the spatial distribution of LRDs and galaxies with Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests of equality of distribution. We find that the neighbourhood of LRDs tends to be less dense compared to galaxies at all selections and masses and at similar redshifts. We further measure upper limit estimates for the halo masses of LRDs using abundance matching. Whilst the population of LRDs could be a mixture of several different inherent populations, as a whole it does appear that these systems are mostly hosting compact galaxies or star clusters in formation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.04004 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The redshift distribution for our LRD sample. The distribution peaks around z ∼ 5 and contains most LRDs in the range 4 ≲ z ≲ 6, similar to Labbe et al. (2023), Kokorev et al. (2024) and Kocevski et al. (2023) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The number density evolution of our LRD sample. The errors on the number density are calculated assuming a Poissonian error on the count of LRDs in each bin. η = 9/24, or ∼ 40%. The NMAD for this sample is 0.112. This is noticeably poorer than for our parent sample (§2.7). This difference in quality is likely tied to our current lack of understanding of the physics involved in LRDs. Parameter estimates produced by v… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Spectrum and model of Hα line for CEERSP9:7426. The best model selected is a double com￾ponent Gaussian with an absorption feature. The FWHM of the components is ∼ 1700 km/s and ∼ 320 km/s for the broad and narrow component respectively [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of FWHM in km/s of the broadest component of each H-alpha line for LRDs. dicative of broad-line AGN (Habouzit & Department of Astronomy 2025). For this reason, we investigate the broad line fraction of our sample. We use the spectra of our 26 LRDs found in…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: AGN (top) and non-AGN (bottom) CIGALE models for JADES:32344 (z = 5.82), which has MIRI coverage. Note that six of the longest wavelength model flux points corresponding to MIRI data are treated as upper limits, whilst the F2550W band is treated as an observed flux. Bo…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: AGN (top) and non-AGN (bottom) CIGALE models for CEERS:2580, which has redshift z = 5.43 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The stellar mass calculated by CIGALE for non￾AGN models compared to the difference in stellar mass for AGN and non-AGN models, expressed logarithmically. The average error is included in the bottom left corner. The stellar mass of the non-AGN model is higher for all b…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Stack plot of the dust extinction calculated by CIGALE for AGN models. Most AGN models are fit by a dust extinction close to extremes (0.1 and 6) of the allowed values. 4.2. Clustering of LRDs 4.2.1. Local environment To study the local environment of galaxies and LRD…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison of the BIC with the fraction of AGN IR luminosity to total IR luminosity. Note that a jitter has been added to distinguish data points. Around ∼ 70 % of pairs of AGN and non-AGN models have a positive ∆BIC value. For LRDs with MIRI data, this is ∼ 9. In com…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Distributions of LRD and galaxy redshifts for the 4.75 < z < 6.5 and 6.5 < z < 8.25 bins. Note that the LRD histograms are weighted to be normalised compared to the the galaxy histograms for ease of visual comparison. The redshift distribution of LRDs and galaxies is …
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The ⟨Σ5⟩ of each run of a random galaxy sample for redshift bin 4.75 < z < 6.5 (top) and 6.5 < z < 8.25 (bottom). The ⟨Σ5⟩ for our LRD and galaxy samples are shown in red and blue respectively, with the ⟨Σ5⟩ of random points shown with a dashed black line for comparis…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Halo mass from abundance matching (red) over the redshift range 3 < z < 11 with redshift bin size ∆z = 1. The SHMR (blue) is calculated from stellar masses extracted by CIGALE for non-AGN models. The SHMR holds rela￾tively constant throughout the bins. The red shaded …

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reduced Incidence of Little Red Dots at z < 3 from Number Density and Halo Mass Evolution

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    LRDs transition from underdense low-halo-mass environments at z>4 to typical galaxy conditions by z~3.5, with halo growth leading to larger sizes and SED changes that explain their disappearance at lower redshifts.

  2. Evidence of violation of Case B recombination in Little Red Dots

    astro-ph.GA 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In one of seven Little Red Dots, the broad Hδ/Hα ratio is more than 5σ below the Case B prediction, signalling a breakdown of standard recombination in very dense gas.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    !1A Qa

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    2017

  2. [2]

    J., Conselice, C

    Adams, N. J., Conselice, C. J., Austin, D., et al. 2024, EPOCHS Paper II: The Ultraviolet Luminosity Function from 7.5<z<13.5 using 180 square arcminutes of deep, blank-fields from the PEARLS Survey and Public JWST data. 2304.13721

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Allen, N., et al. 2023, Two massive, compact, and dust-obscured candidate z 8 galaxies discovered by JWST. 2304.12347

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    little red dots

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2024, COSMOS-Web: The over-abundance and physical nature of "little red dots"--Implications for early galaxy and SMBH assembly. 2406.10341

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.15972, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.15972

    Alberts , S., Lyu , J., Shivaei , I., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.15972, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.15972

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.15972 2024

  6. [6]

    T., Ákos Bogdán, Kovács, O

    Ananna, T. T., Ákos Bogdán, Kovács, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 969, L18, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad5669 2024

  7. [7]

    L., et al

    Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2023, Nature, 622, 707–711, 10.1038/s41586-023-06521-7

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06521-7 2023

  8. [8]

    Baggen, J. F. W., van Dokkum, P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 977, L13, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad90b8 2024

Show all 122 references
  1. [9]

    B., Finkelstein, S

    Bagley, M. B., Finkelstein, S. L., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 946, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/acbb08

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    C., & Monaco , P

    Banik , N., Tan , J. C., & Monaco , P. 2019, , 483, 3592, 10.1093/mnras/sty3298

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    Begelman , M. C. 2010, , 402, 673, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15916.x

    2010

  4. [12]

    H., Hearin , A

    Behroozi , P., Wechsler , R. H., Hearin , A. P., & Conroy , C. 2019, , 488, 3143, 10.1093/mnras/stz1182

    2019 doi

  5. [13]

    S., Wechsler , R

    Behroozi , P. S., Wechsler , R. H., & Conroy , C. 2013, , 770, 57, 10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/57

    2013 doi

  6. [14]

    1996, , 117, 393, 10.1051/aas:1996164

    Bertin , E., & Arnouts , S. 1996, , 117, 393, 10.1051/aas:1996164

    1996 doi

  7. [15]

    2019, , 622, A103, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    Boquien , M., Burgarella , D., Roehlly , Y., et al. 2019, , 622, A103, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    Brammer, G. 2023, msaexp: NIRSpec analyis tools, 0.6.17, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.8319596

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    B., van Dokkum , P

    Brammer , G. B., van Dokkum , P. G., & Coppi , P. 2008, , 686, 1503, 10.1086/591786

    2008 doi

  10. [18]

    2003, , 596, 34, 10.1086/377529

    Bromm , V., & Loeb , A. 2003, , 596, 34, 10.1086/377529

    2003 doi

  11. [19]

    Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., Prusti, T., et al. 2021, Astronomy &; Astrophysics, 650, C3, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657e

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 344, 1000, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 344, 1000, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    2003

  13. [21]

    J., Cameron, A

    Bunker, A. J., Cameron, A. J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 690, A288, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347094

    2024 doi

  14. [23]

    2022, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.8.2, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7325378

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2022, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.8.2, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.7325378

    2022 doi

  15. [24]

    C., et al

    Calzetti , D., Armus , L., Bohlin , R. C., et al. 2000, , 533, 682, 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  16. [26]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Davé, R. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480, 4379, 10.1093/mnras/sty2169

    2018 doi

  17. [27]

    M., Akins , H

    Casey , C. M., Akins , H. B., Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.18873, 10.48550/arXiv.2505.18873

    2025 doi arXiv

  18. [28]

    2024, JWST NIRSpec Spectroscopy of the Remarkable Bright Galaxy GHZ2/GLASS-z12 at Redshift 12.34

    Castellano, M., Napolitano, L., Fontana, A., et al. 2024, JWST NIRSpec Spectroscopy of the Remarkable Bright Galaxy GHZ2/GLASS-z12 at Redshift 12.34. 2403.10238

    2024 arXiv

  19. [29]

    2003, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    2003 doi

  20. [30]

    B., Wang, F., Yang, J., et al

    Champagne, J. B., Wang, F., Yang, J., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 981, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/adb1bc

    2025 doi

  21. [31]

    A., Price-Whelan, A

    Collaboration, T. A., Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    2022 doi

  22. [32]

    Conroy , C., & Gunn , J. E. 2010, FSPS: Flexible Stellar Population Synthesis , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1010.043

    2010

  23. [33]

    J., Adams, N., Harvey, T., et al

    Conselice, C. J., Adams, N., Harvey, T., et al. 2024, EPOCHS I. The Discovery and Star Forming Properties of Galaxies in the Epoch of Reionization at 6.5 < z < 18 with PEARLS and Public JWST data. 2407.14973

    2024 arXiv

  24. [34]

    A., & Schaye, J

    Correa, C. A., & Schaye, J. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 499, 3578, 10.1093/mnras/staa3053

    2020 doi

  25. [35]

    P., et al

    Davis , M., Guhathakurta , P., Konidaris , N. P., et al. 2007, , 660, L1, 10.1086/517931

    2007 doi

  26. [36]

    2018, , 611, A76, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731970

    De Cia , A., Ledoux , C., Petitjean , P., & Savaglio , S. 2018, , 611, A76, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731970

    2018 doi

  27. [37]

    2024, RUBIES: a complete census of the bright and red distant Universe with JWST/NIRSpec

    de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2024, RUBIES: a complete census of the bright and red distant Universe with JWST/NIRSpec. 2409.05948

    2024 arXiv

  28. [38]

    P., et al

    de Graaff , A., Rix , H.-W., Naidu , R. P., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16600, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16600

    2025 doi arXiv

  29. [39]

    J., Scholtz, J., et al

    D'Eugenio, F., Cameron, A. J., Scholtz, J., et al. 2024, JADES Data Release 3 -- NIRSpec/MSA spectroscopy for 4,000 galaxies in the GOODS fields. 2404.06531

    2024 arXiv

  30. [40]

    M., Meena , A

    Diego , J. M., Meena , A. K., Adams , N. J., et al. 2023, , 672, A3, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245238

    2023 doi

  31. [41]

    T., & Li , A

    Draine , B. T., & Li , A. 2007, , 657, 810, 10.1086/511055

    2007 doi

  32. [42]

    T., Aniano , G., Krause , O., et al

    Draine , B. T., Aniano , G., Krause , O., et al. 2014, , 780, 172, 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/172

    2014 doi

  33. [43]

    , Le Fèvre, O

    Durkalec, A. , Le Fèvre, O. , Pollo, A. , et al. 2015, A&A, 583, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425343

    2015 doi

  34. [44]

    Durodola, E., Pacucci, F., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, Exploring the AGN Fraction of a Sample of JWST's Little Red Dots at 5 < z < 8 : Overmassive Black Holes Are Strongly Favored. 2406.10329

    2024 arXiv

  35. [45]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2023, Overview of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES). 2306.02465

    2023 arXiv

  36. [46]

    L., Pascale, M., Foo, N., et al

    Frye, B. L., Pascale, M., Foo, N., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 952, 81, 10.3847/1538-4357/acd929

    2023 doi

  37. [47]

    M., Lin, X., et al

    Fudamoto, Y., Helton, J. M., Lin, X., et al. 2025, SAPPHIRES: A Galaxy Over-Density in the Heart of Cosmic Reionization at z=8.47 . 2503.15597

    2025 arXiv

  38. [48]

    J., Zitrin, A., Plat, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Zitrin, A., Plat, A., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 952, 142, 10.3847/1538-4357/acdc9d

    2023 doi

  39. [49]

    J., Labb \'e , I., Zitrin, A., et al

    Furtak, L. J., Labb \'e , I., Zitrin, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 57, 10.1038/s41586-024-07184-8

    2024 doi

  40. [50]

    2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 634, A135, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936329

    Girelli, G., Pozzetti, L., Bolzonella, M., et al. 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 634, A135, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936329

    2020 doi

  41. [51]

    2024, Nature, 628, 10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9

    Glazebrook, K., Nanayakkara, T., Schreiber, C., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9

    2024 doi

  42. [52]

    2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 974, 84, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6980

    Grazian, A., Giallongo, E., Boutsia, K., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 974, 84, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6980

    2024 doi

  43. [53]

    E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 964, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1e5f

    2024 doi

  44. [54]

    A., Kocevski, D

    Grogin, N. A., Kocevski, D. D., Faber, S. M., et al. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 197, 35, 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35

    2011 doi

  45. [55]

    A., Pacucci, F., & Kocevski, D

    Guia, C. A., Pacucci, F., & Kocevski, D. D. 2024, Research Notes of the AAS, 8, 207, 10.3847/2515-5172/ad7262

    2024 doi

  46. [56]

    O., Gebhardt , K., et al

    G \"u ltekin , K., Richstone , D. O., Gebhardt , K., et al. 2009, , 698, 198, 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/198

    2009 doi

  47. [57]

    F., et al

    Guo , Y., Rafelski , M., Bell , E. F., et al. 2018, , 853, 108, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa018

    2018 doi

  48. [58]

    Habouzit , M., & Department of Astronomy , Chemin d'Ecogia, U. o. G. 2025, , 537, 2323, 10.1093/mnras/staf167

    2025 doi

  49. [59]

    N., Johnson , B

    Hainline , K. N., Johnson , B. D., Robertson , B., et al. 2024 a , , 964, 71, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1ee4

    2024 doi

  50. [60]

    N., Helton , J

    Hainline , K. N., Helton , J. M., Johnson , B. D., et al. 2024 b , , 964, 66, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad20d1

    2024 doi

  51. [61]

    A., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S

    Haro, P. A., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 951, L22, 10.3847/2041-8213/acdd54

    2023 doi

  52. [62]

    2023, Black hole mass and Eddington ratio distributions of less-luminous quasars at z 4 in the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Wide field

    He, W., Akiyama, M., Enoki, M., et al. 2023, Black hole mass and Eddington ratio distributions of less-luminous quasars at z 4 in the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam Wide field. 2311.08922

    2023 arXiv

  53. [63]

    E., Watson , D., Brammer , G., et al

    Heintz , K. E., Watson , D., Brammer , G., et al. 2024, Science, 384, 890, 10.1126/science.adj0343

    2024 doi

  54. [64]

    C., Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J

    Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. W. 1983, Understanding Robust and Exploratory Data Analysis (New York: Wiley) (Wiley)

    1983

  55. [65]

    W., Hsu , C.-C., Hathi , N., et al

    Holwerda , B. W., Hsu , C.-C., Hathi , N., et al. 2024, , 529, 1067, 10.1093/mnras/stae316

    2024 doi

  56. [66]

    2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 386, 2242, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13195.x

    Hu, J. 2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 386, 2242, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13195.x

    2008

  57. [67]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  58. [68]

    2017, The Hubble Legacy Fields (HLF-GOODS-S) v1.5 Data Products: Combining 2442 Orbits of GOODS-S/CDF-S Region ACS and WFC3/IR Images

    Illingworth, G., Magee, D., Bouwens, R., et al. 2017, The Hubble Legacy Fields (HLF-GOODS-S) v1.5 Data Products: Combining 2442 Orbits of GOODS-S/CDF-S Region ACS and WFC3/IR Images. 1606.00841

    2017 arXiv

  59. [69]

    2025, , 980, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    Inayoshi , K., & Maiolino , R. 2025, , 980, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/adaebd

    2025 doi

  60. [71]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.13082, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.13082

    Ji , X., Maiolino , R., \"U bler , H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.13082, 10.48550/arXiv.2501.13082

    2025 doi

  61. [72]

    E., & Raftery, A

    Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. 1995, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2291091

    1995

  62. [73]

    D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al

    Kocevski, D. D., Onoue, M., Inayoshi, K., et al. 2023, Hidden Little Monsters: Spectroscopic Identification of Low-Mass, Broad-Line AGN at z>5 with CEERS. 2302.00012

    2023 arXiv

  63. [74]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 986, 126, 10.3847/1538-4357/adbc7d

    2025 doi

  64. [75]

    M., Faber, S

    Koekemoer, A. M., Faber, S. M., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 197, 36, 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36

    2011 doi

  65. [76]

    2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 957, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a

    Kokorev, V., Fujimoto, S., Labbe, I., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 957, L7, 10.3847/2041-8213/ad037a

    2023 doi

  66. [77]

    I., Greene, J

    Kokorev, V., Caputi, K. I., Greene, J. E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints. 2401.09981

    2024 arXiv

  67. [78]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.04777, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.04777

    Kokubo , M., & Harikane , Y. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.04777, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.04777

    2024 doi

  68. [79]

    Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. 2013, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 51, 511, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811

    2013 doi

  69. [80]

    E., Bezanson, R., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2023, UNCOVER: Candidate Red Active Galactic Nuclei at 3 <z< 7 with JWST and ALMA. 2306.07320

    2023 arXiv

  70. [81]

    E., Matthee, J., et al

    Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Matthee, J., et al. 2024, An unambiguous AGN and a Balmer break in an Ultraluminous Little Red Dot at z=4.47 from Ultradeep UNCOVER and All the Little Things Spectroscopy. 2412.04557

    2024 arXiv

  71. [82]

    2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 957, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/acfeec

    Langeroodi, D., & Hjorth, J. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 957, L27, 10.3847/2041-8213/acfeec

    2023 doi

  72. [83]

    L., Hutchison , T

    Larson , R. L., Hutchison , T. A., Bagley , M., et al. 2023, , 958, 141, 10.3847/1538-4357/acfed4

    2023 doi

  73. [84]

    Leung, G. C. K., Finkelstein, S. L., Pérez-González, P. G., et al. 2024, Exploring the Nature of Little Red Dots: Constraints on AGN and Stellar Contributions from PRIMER MIRI Imaging. 2411.12005

    2024 arXiv

  74. [85]

    J., Sarron, F., et al

    Li, Q., Conselice, C. J., Sarron, F., et al. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 539, 1796, 10.1093/mnras/staf543

    2025 doi

  75. [86]

    Li, Z., Inayoshi, K., Chen, K., Ichikawa, K., & Ho, L. C. 2024, Little Red Dots: Rapidly Growing Black Holes Reddened by Extended Dusty Flows. 2407.10760

    2024 arXiv

  76. [87]

    Lopes , P. A. A., Rembold , S. B., Ribeiro , A. L. B., Nascimento , R. S., & Vajgel , B. 2016, , 461, 2559, 10.1093/mnras/stw1497

    2016 doi

  77. [88]

    2024, JWST view of four infant galaxies at z=8.31-8.49 in the MACS0416 field and implications for reionization

    Ma, Z., Sun, B., Cheng, C., et al. 2024, JWST view of four infant galaxies at z=8.31-8.49 in the MACS0416 field and implications for reionization. 2406.04617

    2024 arXiv

  78. [89]

    2024, Cosmic Reionization in the JWST Era: Back to AGNs? 2406.18697

    Madau, P., Giallongo, E., Grazian, A., & Haardt, F. 2024, Cosmic Reionization in the JWST Era: Back to AGNs? 2406.18697

    2024 arXiv

  79. [90]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.00504, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.00504

    Maiolino , R., Risaliti , G., Signorini , M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.00504, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.00504

    2024 doi arXiv

  80. [91]

    2005, , 362, 799, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09270.x

    Maraston , C. 2005, , 362, 799, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09270.x

    2005

  81. [92]

    S., Saumon , D., Visscher , C., et al

    Marley , M. S., Saumon , D., Visscher , C., et al. 2021, , 920, 85, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac141d

    2021 doi

  82. [93]

    V., de Graaff, A., Franx, M., et al

    Maseda, M. V., de Graaff, A., Franx, M., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 689, A73, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449914

    2024 doi

  83. [94]

    A., Kashikawa, N., et al

    Matsuoka, Y., Strauss, M. A., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 869, 150, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaee7a

    2018 doi

  84. [95]

    P., Brammer, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024 a , Little Red Dots: an abundant population of faint AGN at z 5 revealed by the EIGER and FRESCO JWST surveys. 2306.05448

    2024 arXiv

  85. [96]

    P., Kotiwale, G., et al

    Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Kotiwale, G., et al. 2024 b , Environmental Evidence for Overly Massive Black Holes in Low Mass Galaxies and a Black Hole - Halo Mass Relation at z 5 . 2412.02846

    2024 arXiv

  86. [97]

    2025, Accelerated Emergence of Evolved Galaxies in Early Overdensities at z 5.7

    Morishita, T., Liu, Z., Stiavelli, M., et al. 2025, Accelerated Emergence of Evolved Galaxies in Early Overdensities at z 5.7 . 2408.10980

    2025 arXiv

  87. [98]

    P., Matthee , J., Katz , H., et al

    Naidu , R. P., Matthee , J., Katz , H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.16596

    2025 doi arXiv

  88. [99]

    2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 904, 89, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbe11

    Niida, M., Nagao, T., Ikeda, H., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 904, 89, 10.3847/1538-4357/abbe11

    2020 doi

  89. [100]

    2009, , 507, 1793, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912497

    Noll , S., Burgarella , D., Giovannoli , E., et al. 2009, , 507, 1793, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912497

    2009 doi

  90. [101]

    A., Grogin, N

    O'Brien, R., Jansen, R. A., Grogin, N. A., et al. 2024, TREASUREHUNT: Transients and Variability Discovered with HST in the JWST North Ecliptic Pole Time Domain Field. 2401.04944

    2024 arXiv

  91. [102]

    Oke , J. B. 1974, , 27, 21, 10.1086/190287

    1974 doi

  92. [103]

    B., & Gunn , J

    Oke , J. B., & Gunn , J. E. 1983, , 266, 713, 10.1086/160817

    1983 doi

  93. [104]

    D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al

    Perrin, M. D., Sivaramakrishnan, A., Lajoie, C.-P., et al. 2014, in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, Vol. 9143, SPIE, 1174--1184

    2014

  94. [105]

    D., Soummer, R., Elliott, E

    Perrin, M. D., Soummer, R., Elliott, E. M., Lallo, M. D., & Sivaramakrishnan, A. 2012, in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2012: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. M. C. Clampin, G. G. Fazio, H. A. MacEwen, & J. M. O. Jr., Vol. 8442, International Society for Opti...

    2012 doi

  95. [106]

    Little Red Dots

    Pizzati, E., Hennawi, J. F., Schaye, J., et al. 2024, "Little Red Dots" cannot reside in the same dark matter halos as comparably luminous unobscured quasars. 2409.18208

    2024 arXiv

  96. [107]

    Planck Collaboration , Ade, P. A. R. , Aghanim, N. , et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830

    2016 doi

  97. [108]

    M., Barrientes, J., Blome, C., et al

    Pontoppidan, K. M., Barrientes, J., Blome, C., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 936, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8a4e

    2022 doi

  98. [109]

    G., Barro, G., Rieke, G

    Pérez-González, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, What is the nature of Little Red Dots and what is not, MIRI SMILES edition. 2401.08782

    2024 arXiv

  99. [110]

    J., Robertson , B., Tacchella , S., et al

    Rieke , M. J., Robertson , B., Tacchella , S., et al. 2023, , 269, 16, 10.3847/1538-4365/acf44d

    2023 doi

  100. [111]

    P., et al

    Rusakov, V., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G. P., et al. 2025, JWST's little red dots: an emerging population of young, low-mass AGN cocooned in dense ionized gas. 2503.16595

    2025

  101. [112]

    J., Greene , J

    Setton , D. J., Greene , J. E., de Graaff , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.03424, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.03424

    2024 doi arXiv

  102. [113]

    Stalevski , M., Fritz , J., Baes , M., Nakos , T., & Popovi \'c , L. C . 2012, , 420, 2756, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19775.x

    2012

  103. [114]

    2016, , 458, 2288, 10.1093/mnras/stw444

    Stalevski , M., Ricci , C., Ueda , Y., et al. 2016, , 458, 2288, 10.1093/mnras/stw444

    2016 doi

  104. [115]

    J., Hewett, P

    Temple, M. J., Hewett, P. C., & Banerji, M. 2021, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 508, 737, 10.1093/mnras/stab2586

    2021 doi

  105. [116]

    V., Klypin, A., et al

    Tinker, J., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A., et al. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 688, 709, 10.1086/591439

    2008 doi

  106. [117]

    L., Robertson , B

    Tinker , J. L., Robertson , B. E., Kravtsov , A. V., et al. 2010, , 724, 878, 10.1088/0004-637X/724/2/878

    2010 doi

  107. [118]

    van Dokkum, P. G. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 674, 29–50, 10.1086/525014

    2008 doi

  108. [119]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  109. [120]

    Werner, C., & Schermelleh-Engel, K. 2010

    2010

  110. [121]

    E., Ashas, M., Illingworth, G., et al

    Whitaker, K. E., Ashas, M., Illingworth, G., et al. 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 244, 16, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab3853

    2019 doi

  111. [122]

    C., Alberts, S., Ji, Z., et al

    Williams, C. C., Alberts, S., Ji, Z., et al. 2023, The galaxies missed by Hubble and ALMA: the contribution of extremely red galaxies to the cosmic census at 3<z<8. 2311.07483

    2023 arXiv

  112. [123]

    A., Cohen, S

    Windhorst, R. A., Cohen, S. H., Jansen, R. A., et al. 2022, The Astronomical Journal, 165, 13, 10.3847/1538-3881/aca163

    2022 doi

  113. [124]

    T., et al

    Yue , M., Eilers , A.-C., Ananna , T. T., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.13290, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.13290

    2024 doi arXiv

  114. [125]

    Zhang, Z., Jiang, L., Liu, W., & Ho, L. C. 2024, Analysis of Multi-epoch JWST Images of 300 Little Red Dots: Tentative Detection of Variability in a Minority of Sources. 2411.02729

    2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.