Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 6 minor 49 references

Deepfake Technology Unveiled: The Commoditization of AI and Its Impact on Digital Trust

T0 review · 5 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Realistic deepfakes are now a commodity: two subscriptions and free open-source tools produced a face-swapped, voice-cloned video for $153.61 CAD, less than a third of the 2019 cost.

desk verdict A competent student white paper that re-demonstrates a known deepfake workflow with a concrete but unvalidated cost data point; not a research contribution. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07363 v2 pith:UKGQZKQP submitted 2025-01-24 cs.CY cs.AI

Claudiu Popa , Rex Pallath , Liam Cunningham , Hewad Tahiri , Abiram Kesavarajah , Tao Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords deepfakesgenerativeAIvoicecloningface-swappingmediaauthenticitydigitaltrustdeepfakefraudcostanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This white paper argues that realistic deepfakes have become a commodity. With two paid subscriptions and free open-source software, the authors produced a face-swapped, voice-cloned video they judge better than a comparable 2019 deepfake that cost about $772 CAD. The paper's goal is to show that the financial and technical barriers to creating convincing synthetic media have collapsed, and that this collapse threatens trust in video and audio evidence. It also evaluates voice-cloning tools, tests face-swap restorers, and calls for regulation, detection, and public awareness. If the central demonstration holds, the dominant threat is not specialized AI labs but ordinary fraudsters with an internet connection.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a three-tool production workflow. Runway's Gen-3 Alpha generates the base video and provides lip-syncing for the scripted face; Rope performs the face swap, accepting a single still image of the target and offering restorer models (GPEN256, GFPGAN, CF, GPEN512) that sharpen the swapped face; ElevenLabs' Creator plan clones the target's voice and can change the actor's voice into the victim's for live scenarios. The quantitative core of the argument is the cost comparison: $153.61 CAD for the 2024 pipeline versus $772 CAD for the 2019 baseline, with side-by-side stills used to assert the newer output looks more realistic.

What would settle it

If untrained human raters, or off-the-shelf deepfake detectors, consistently identify the authors' videos and cloned voices as fake, the central claim that convincing deepfakes are now available for under $160 CAD would be undercut. A simpler check is reproduction: a different team following the same workflow with the same budget and hardware would need to obtain comparable quality for the generalization to hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the commoditization of generative AI lets a non-specialist produce a deepfake that is superior to the 2019 state of the art for less than a third of the cost. Using Runway's Gen-3 Alpha to generate and lip-sync base video, Rope (an open-source fork of Roop) to swap faces from a single reference image, and ElevenLabs to clone a voice from short audio samples, the authors produced a longer, smoother video with realistic voice cloning for $153.61 CAD. Their baseline is a 2019 deepfake that cost $552 USD ($772 CAD), was visual-only, and looked jittery and unnatural. From this comparison they conclude that realistic deepfakes are now available 'to anyone with an internet connection,' making the erosion of digital trust an immediate practical problem rather than a hypothetical one.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the authors' self-produced videos and cloned voices are realistic enough to deceive typical viewers and listeners; the paper supports this with side-by-side figures and subjective wording, not with a perception study or detection test.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A fraudster with no AI expertise can impersonate a specific person using one still image and short audio samples, because the entire pipeline runs on consumer hardware.
  • Live impersonation on video calls is within reach, since Rope runs on a 6 GB laptop GPU and ElevenLabs supports real-time voice changing.
  • Audio-only scams can be automated and scaled, because cloned voices can answer phone calls in real time and be generated in bulk.
  • Video and audio lose their default status as trustworthy evidence, pushing courts, insurers, and platforms toward authentication or detection.
  • Detection is a moving target, because new forks of the face-swap software keep improving rendering speed and quality, as the Rope NEXT speedups show.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A formal perceptual study asking untrained viewers to distinguish the authors' deepfakes from real footage would quantify the threat; the paper stops at side-by-side figures and subjective wording.
  • The $153.61 CAD figure counts subscriptions only, not labour time, hardware, or skill; including those would raise the effective barrier and qualify the 'anyone with an internet connection' claim.
  • The same pipeline could be benchmarked against commercial deepfake detectors to identify which artifacts, such as hair motion, lip-sync lag, or restorer choice, are most detectable; that experiment is not run here.
  • The paper's appeal to blockchain-style authentication implies a testable requirement: provenance systems must keep verification costs lower than the cost of producing a convincing fake, an economic constraint the paper leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 6 minor

Summary. This white paper claims that the commoditization of generative AI has sharply lowered the cost and technical skill required to create realistic deepfakes. The authors use Runway, Rope, and ElevenLabs to produce a deepfake video and cloned voice of their project sponsor, reporting a total software cost of $153.61 CAD (about $160 CAD) and comparing their output to a 2019 deepfake by Timothy B. Lee that cost $772 CAD. The paper also surveys deepfake audio tools, evaluates the Rope face-swapping software's restorer models, discusses generative AI models such as GANs and VAEs, and proposes regulatory and technical mitigations including blockchain-based content authentication. The central assertion is that realistic, deception-capable synthetic media are now accessible to anyone with an internet connection for under $160 CAD.

Significance. If the central empirical claim were adequately supported, the paper would have practical value as a demonstration of lowered barriers to deepfake creation, contributing to policy discussions on digital trust. The cost figures, render-time tables, and workflow description are concrete and reproducible in a way that is useful for security awareness. However, the paper's significance is limited by the absence of any perceptual or automated detection evaluation: the claim that the produced media are 'realistic and believable' rests entirely on the authors' own visual judgment and still images. The comparison to the 2019 deepfake is not apples-to-apples, and the paper overgeneralizes from a single demonstration to the broad conclusion that GAN-generated deepfakes are 'undecipherable to human eyes and even to an AI model.' With proper validation and tempered claims, the contribution could be a useful case study, but in its current form the headline claim is empirically underdetermined.

major comments (5)
  1. [II.F, V, VII] The central claim that a 'superior-looking product' was produced for 'less than a third of the deepfake's price' relies on an invalid comparison. Lee's 2019 deepfake used different software (Face Swap), required manual training on a large dataset, involved no voice cloning, and targeted a different subject (Mark Zuckerberg) with abundant public reference media. The authors' 2024 deepfake targets a sponsor with much less public data, but also uses a different pipeline (Runway for base generation, Rope for face-swapping, ElevenLabs for voice). 'Superior-looking' is asserted subjectively with no perceptual rating or blind comparison. This undermines the quantitative cost comparison in Section II.F and the conclusion in Section V.D that open-source tools are 'child's play' to use.
  2. [V, VI.C, VII] The paper provides no evidence that the produced deepfake videos and cloned voices are realistic enough to deceive human viewers or evade detection. Section V.A asserts 'high-quality results' based on a static still (Fig. 5.1), and Section V.B evaluates only render time, not perceptual fidelity or detection robustness. Section VI.C explicitly admits that hair movement remained a 'persistent issue' producing 'noticeable imperfections' that required adoption of more advanced tools. Section VII then concludes that the authors were 'able to create realistic and believable deepfakes' and further claims that GANs make deepfakes 'undecipherable to human eyes and even to an AI model.' This last claim is an unsupported overgeneralization contradicted by a large literature on GAN artifact detection. Without a human perceptual study, an automated detection test, or independent third-party assessment, the paper's core threat-assessment premise is unverified.
  3. [V.B, Tables II and III] The render-time comparisons in Tables II and III are reported as single numbers with no indication of variance, number of runs, or experimental protocol. The text does not specify the video resolution, frame count, whether the system was warm, or whether timings include file I/O. Single-run timings on one machine are not sufficient to support the claim of 'performance improvements of up to 4.6 times' or to generalize about the software's resource requirements. This is a presentation and methodology issue, but it affects the paper's practical recommendations about low-cost hardware.
  4. [II.E, II.F, III] The cost accounting is incomplete and loosely specified. Table I lists final costs of $135.87 for Runway and $17.74 for ElevenLabs but does not state the subscription period, whether taxes or currency conversion are included, or whether the abandoned Amazon EC2 instance (mentioned in V.C.2) incurred any cost. The text moves from '$153.61 CAD' to 'less than $160 CAD' without explaining the discrepancy. Section III presents hypothetical scam scenarios as if they follow from the demonstration, but the paper does not show that real-time voice cloning or real-time video deepfakes were actually implemented, so these scenarios are speculative rather than empirical contributions.
  5. [VII] The proposed mitigation using blockchain technology is described inconsistently: the text calls it a 'centralized system' after summarizing blockchain as a distributed, tamper-proof ledger. More importantly, the paper cites Gambin et al. and Fraga-Lamas and Fernandez-Carames without critically discussing the known scalability, latency, and adoption barriers of blockchain-based content authentication. As a policy recommendation, this section is too superficial to be actionable.
minor comments (6)
  1. [IV.B.1] The heading 'Obeservations' is a typo for 'Observations', and Section V.B's heading 'Testing & Evaluvation' should be 'Testing & Evaluation'.
  2. [II.E] There is a duplicated word: 'The ElevenLabs companycompany claims' should read 'The ElevenLabs company claims'.
  3. [IV.D.3] The heading 'Mitigation Stratigies' should be 'Mitigation Strategies'.
  4. [II.F] Table I's title 'SOFWARE COSTS (CAD)' contains a typo; it should be 'SOFTWARE COSTS (CAD)'.
  5. [II.F and V] Figure numbering is inconsistent: Fig. 2.2 is captioned as 'Mark Zuckerberg ... and a deepfake ...' while the text refers to 'Fig. 2.3', and Section V.C.1 refers to 'Fig. 3.2' which does not exist in the manuscript. The name 'Timothee B. Lee' in the Fig. 2.2 caption should be 'Timothy B. Lee'.
  6. [V.A] The sentence about Fig. 5.1 is ambiguous: it says 'On the left, we see Rupert Friend as Agent 47 ... and on the right is Claudiu Popa ... face swapped into the clip'—clarify which side is the original and which is the swap.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the cost-and-accessibility claim is an empirical demonstration, and the realism assessments are under-validated rather than derived from their own assumptions.

full rationale

The paper is a practical demonstration, not a formal derivation, so the core circularity patterns (self-definitional equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citations, imported uniqueness theorems, ansatz-smuggling citations, or renaming of known results) do not arise. The central claim that a realistic deepfake can be produced for under $160 CAD rests on the authors' own production: they purchased Runway and ElevenLabs subscriptions, used Rope for face-swapping, and reported the resulting costs in Table I; no quantity is defined in terms of another claimed result, and no prediction is statistically forced by a fitted input. The comparisons to Timothy B. Lee's 2019 deepfake and to the 2019 Zuckerberg deepfake are qualitative and under-controlled, but they are not circular. The main weakness is evidentiary: the paper asserts 'realistic and believable deepfakes' (Section VII) and states that GAN-based deepfakes are 'undecipherable to human eyes and even to an AI model' (Section V.D) without a perceptual study, detection experiment, or independent review, and Section VI.C itself admits persistent hair-movement imperfections. That is an unsupported or missing-evidence problem, not a circularity problem. There are no self-citations carrying argumentative weight; references are to external sources, and the one approximate comparison (2019 vs. 2024) is a cost observation rather than a derivation. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters or invented entities appear. The paper rests on two unverified domain assumptions about realism and undetectability, plus the implicit assumption that the workflow and costs are representative of typical threat actors.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The authors' self-produced deepfakes are realistic enough to deceive typical viewers and evade detection.
    Section V and VII assert this based on side-by-side figures, without a perceptual study or detection benchmark. The central threat conclusion depends on it.
  • domain assumption GAN-based deepfakes are effectively undetectable by AI tools.
    Section VII states deepfakes are 'undecipherable' to AI models, but no detection tools were tested and no supporting evidence is cited. This is an unverified premise for the mitigation discussion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Deepfake Technology Unveiled: The Commoditization of AI and Its Impact on Digital Trust." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UKGQZKQP

@misc{pith2026250607363,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Deepfake Technology Unveiled: The Commoditization of AI and Its Impact on Digital Trust},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UKGQZKQP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07363}
}
read the original abstract

Deepfake Technology Unveiled: The Commoditization of AI and Its Impact on Digital Trust. With the increasing accessibility of generative AI, tools for voice cloning, face-swapping, and synthetic media creation have advanced significantly, lowering both financial and technical barriers for their use. While these technologies present innovative opportunities, their rapid growth raises concerns about trust, privacy, and security. This white paper explores the implications of deepfake technology, analyzing its role in enabling fraud, misinformation, and the erosion of authenticity in multimedia. Using cost-effective, easy to use tools such as Runway, Rope, and ElevenLabs, we explore how realistic deepfakes can be created with limited resources, demonstrating the risks posed to individuals and organizations alike. By analyzing the technical and ethical challenges of deepfake mitigation and detection, we emphasize the urgent need for regulatory frameworks, public awareness, and collaborative efforts to maintain trust in digital media.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07363 by the authors.

Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. The number of deepfake videos available online [4]. B. Software Analysis The inherent cost of running successful deepfake campaigns or scams depends on the scope and scale of the intended scam. To perform small-scale deepfake scams, such as impersonating a celebrity or individual to deceive a single person, a threat actor could do so with negligible monetary or technical investment. However, performing large-scale f… view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. Mark Zuckerberg (top left) and a deepfake of the character Data from Star Trek imposed onto his face (top right). Created by Timothee B. Lee [11]. Only five years later, a superior-looking product, a video over four times as long, with more realistic facial cloning and realistic voice cloning, was produced for less than a third of the deepfake’s price, using only easily accessible and easily automated software. This… view at source ↗
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3. Above: Mark Zuckerberg (top left) and a deepfake replication of his face (top right) (2019) [10]. Below: Claudiu Popa (bottom left) and a deepfake replication of his face (bottom right) (2024). This level of quality was readily accessible to anyone with an internet connection and could be mimicked for less than $160 CAD. This is especially concerning when looking at the choice of victim. In 2019, it was easy to acce… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: Play.ht’s configuration options. Speechify, however, offered no customization features, making it less adaptable for creating tailored audio. 2) Verdict: After thorough evaluation, ElevenLabs was selected for further analysis due to its superior realism and advanced …
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Figure 5.2: (From left to right) No restorer, GPEN256, GFPGAN, CF, GPEN512. TABLE II. RESTORER MODEL COMPARISONS (ROPE) Restorer Model Name Render Time (seconds) No Restorer 18 GPEN256 23.8 GFPGAN 38.2 CF 53.3 GPEN512 60.7 C. Challenges 1) Hair, Beard & Skin Color: We noticed th…
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Figure 5.1: On the left, we see Rupert Friend as Agent 47 from the movie Hitman (2015) [32] and on the right is Claudiu Popa, our project sponsor, face swapped into the clip using Rope. B. Testing & Evaluvation We configured Rope on a system with the following specifications:  …
Figure 6.2
Figure 6.2. Figure 6.2: Deepfake flowchart. E. Advancements in Generative AI Models Generative AI models have significantly advanced content creation by enabling machines to produce data that closely resembles real-world inputs. Among these models are Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) …
Figure 6.3
Figure 6.3. Figure 6.3: below exemplifies this capability, showcasing how Runway can generate synthetic portraits with intricate details, realistic lighting, and dynamic backgrounds. In this example, the generated image showcases subtle features like facial expressions and environmental dep…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: below exemplifies this capability, showcasing how [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    How underground groups use stolen identities and deepfakes,

    V. Kropotov, F. Yarochkin, C. Gibson, and S. Hilt, “How underground groups use stolen identities and deepfakes,” Trend Micro, https://trendmicro.com/en_us/research/22/i/how -underground -groups -use- stolen -identities-and-deepfakes.html (accessed Nov. 18, 2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Romance scammer used deepfa kes to impersonate a navy admiral and bilk widow out of nearly $300,000,

    J. Rohrlich, “Romance scammer used deepfa kes to impersonate a navy admiral and bilk widow out of nearly $300,000,” The Daily Beast, https://thedailybeast.com/romance -scammer-used -deepfakes -to-impersonate - a-navy -admiral-and-bilk-widow-out-of-nearly-dollar300000 (accessed Nov. 18, 2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Deepfaked voice enabled $35 million bank heist in 2020,

    M. Anderson, “Deepfaked voice enabled $35 million bank heist in 2020,” Unite.AI, https://unite.ai/deepfaked -voice-enabled-35-million-bank- heist-in-2020/ (accessed Nov. 19, 2024)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    2023 state of deepfakes,

    “2023 state of deepfakes,” 2023 State Of Deepfakes: Realities, Threats, And Impa ct, https://securityhero.io/state -of-deepfakes/#overview -of-current - state (accessed Nov. 19, 2024)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    CSDL: IEEE Computer Society,

    N. Kshetri, “CSDL: IEEE Computer Society,” CSDL | IEEE Computer Society, https://computer.org/csdl/magazine/co/2023/08/10206053/1PlcMAFEiNa (accessed Nov. 19, 2024)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Tools for human imagination.,

    “Tools for human imagination.,” Runway, https://runwayml.com/ (accessed Nov. 19, 2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    S0MD3V/Roop: One -click face swap,

    H. Ruhs, “S0MD3V/Roop: One -click face swap,” GitHub, https://github.com/s0md3v/roop (accessed Nov. 23, 2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Gui Ruby Rope Face Swap,

    “Gui Ruby Rope Face Swap,” Hillobar Rope, http s://hillobarrope.one/ (accessed Nov. 23, 2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Free text to Speech & AI Voice Generator,

    “Free text to Speech & AI Voice Generator,” ElevenLabs, https://elevenlabs.io/ (accessed Nov. 23, 2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    Facebook says Deepfake video shared on Instagram of Mark Zuckerberg appearing to say he’s in ‘total control of billions of people’s stolen data’ does not violate company policies,

    S. H. Haney, “Facebook says Deepfake video shared on Instagram of Mark Zuckerberg appearing to say he’s in ‘total control of billions of people’s stolen data’ does not violate company policies,” Dailymail.com, https://dailymail.co.uk/news/article -7130383/Deepfake -video -Mark...

    2024

  3. [11]

    I created my own deepfake -it took two weeks and cost $552,

    T. B. Lee, “I created my own deepfake -it took two weeks and cost $552,” Ars Technica, https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/12/how -i-created - a-deepfake-of-mark-zuckerberg-and-star-treks-data/ (accessed Nov. 20, 2024)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Deepfake: An Overview,

    A. Chadha, V. Kumar, S. K ashyap, and M. Gupta, "Deepfake: An Overview," in Proceedings of Second International Conference on Computing, Communications, and Cyber -Security, vol. 203, P. K. Singh, S. T. Wierzchoń, S. Tanwar, M. Ganzha, and J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, Eds., Singapor...

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    Deepfake: Risks and Opportunities,

    P. S. Chauhan, "Deepfake: Risks and Opportunities," Computer , vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 141 –144, Jun. 03, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee .org/document/10547080

    2024

  6. [14]

    Inclusive Voice AI for People with Speech Impairments,

    "Inclusive Voice AI for People with Speech Impairments," CORDIS, Sep. 15, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://cordis.europa.eu/article/id/446340 - inclusive-voice-ai-for-people-with-speech -impairments

    2023

  7. [15]

    New Research Combats the Burgeon ing Threat of Deepfake Audio,

    "New Research Combats the Burgeon ing Threat of Deepfake Audio," University of California , Jan. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://universityofcalifornia.edu/news/new -research -combats -burgeoning - threat-deepfake-audio

    2024

  8. [16]

    Sounding the Alarm: UF Cybersecurity Expert Exposes Audio Deepfake,

    H. Goh, "Sounding the Alarm: UF Cybersecurity Expert Exposes Audio Deepfake," University of Florida , May 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://eng.ufl.edu/newengineer/news/uf -cybersecurity -expert-exposes -audio- deepfake

    2024

  9. [17]

    Availability of Voice Deepfake Technology and its Impact for Good and Evil,

    N. A mezaga and J. Hajek, "Availability of Voice Deepfake Technology and its Impact for Good and Evil," in SIGITE '22: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Information Technology Education , pp. 23 –28, Sep. 21, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145...

    2022

  10. [18]

    A Review of Modern Audio Deepfake Detection Methods: Challenges and Future Directions,

    Z. Almutairi and H. Elgibreen, "A Review of Modern Audio Deepfake Detection Methods: Challenges and Future Directions," Algorithms, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 155, May 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: https:// mdpi.com/1999-4893/15/5/155

    2022

  11. [19]

    Huge Bank Fraud Uses Deepfake Voice Tech to Steal Millions,

    T. Brewster, "Huge Bank Fraud Uses Deepfake Voice Tech to Steal Millions," Forbes, Oct. 14, 2 021. [Online]. Available: https://forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2021/10/14/huge -bank-fraud-uses - deep-fake-voice-tech-to-steal-millions

    2021

  12. [20]

    AI, Politics and the Battle Against Misinformation,

    J. Espinoza, "AI, Politics and the Battle Against Misinformation," Financial Times , Nov. 14, 2024. [Online]. Available : https://ft.com/content/1bef15fd -8078-4824-a18a-76adc9c55a27

    2024

  13. [21]

    Discussion Paper: The Threat of Real Time Deepfakes,

    G. Frankovits and Y. Mirsky, "Discussion Paper: The Threat of Real Time Deepfakes," arXiv, Jun. 04, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02487

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    A Look at Global Dee pfake Regulation Approaches,

    A. Lawson, "A Look at Global Dee pfake Regulation Approaches," Responsible Artificial Intelligence Institute , Apr. 24, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://responsible.ai/a -look-at-global-deepfake -regulation- approaches

    2023

  15. [23]

    V2A -Mark: Versatile Deep Visual -Audio Watermarking for Manipulation Localization and Copyright Protection,

    X. Zhang, Y. Xu, R. Li, J. Yu, W. Li, Z. Xu, and J. Zhang, " V2A -Mark: Versatile Deep Visual -Audio Watermarking for Manipulation Localization and Copyright Protection," arXiv, Nov. 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16824

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    The Impact of Deepfake Audio on Society: Combating Audio Manipulation,

    "The Impact of Deepfake Audio on Society: Combating Audio Manipulation," Media Med ic Studio , Sep. 19, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://mediamedic.studio/the -impact-of-deepfake-audio-on-society - combating-audio-manipulation

    2023

  17. [25]

    Launching the Deepfake Detection Challenge: A Collaborative Effort Against Digital Deception,

    K. Shanks, "Launching the Deepfake Detection Challenge: A Collaborative Effort Against Digital Deception," ACE Bl og, GOV.UK, May 10, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ace.blog.gov.uk/2024/05/10/launching - the-deepfake-detection -challenge-a-collaborative-effort-against -dig...

    2024

  18. [26]

    Deepfake definition & meaning,

    Merriam-Webster, "Deepfake definition & meaning," Merriam- Webster, [Online]. Available: https://merriam - webster.com/dictionary/deepfake . [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2024]

    2024

  19. [27]

    hacksider, Deep-Live-Cam. GitHub. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/hacksider/Deep -Live-Cam. [Accessed: Nov. 29, 2024]

    2024

  20. [28]

    neuralchen, SimSwap . GitHub. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/neuralchen/SimSwap . [Accessed: Nov. 29, 2024]

    2024

  21. [29]

    Hillobar, Rope. GitHub. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/Hillobar/Rope . [Accessed: Nov. 29, 2024]

    2024

  22. [30]

    Alucard24, Rope. GitHub. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/Alucard24/Rope . [Accessed: Nov. 29, 2024]

    2024

  23. [31]

    s0md3v, roop. GitHub. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/s0md3v/roop . [Accessed: Nov. 29, 2024]

    2024

  24. [32]

    HITMAN: A GENT 47 Clip -

    JoBlo Movie Clips , " HITMAN: A GENT 47 Clip - "Police Station Escape" (2015) ," YouTube . [Online]. Available: https://youtu.be/wnd81H000Wk . [Accessed: Nov. 29, 2024]

    2015

  25. [33]

    Deepfakes: More frightening than Photoshop on steroids,

    H. B. Dixon, "Deepfakes: More frightening than Photoshop on steroids," Judges' Journal , Summer 2019. [Online]. Available: https://americanbar.org/groups/judicial/publications/judges_journal/2019/sum mer/deepfakes -more-frightening -photoshop -steroids/ . [Accessed: Nov. 29, 2024]

    2019

  26. [34]

    An overview of GA N-DeepFakes detection: Proposal, improvement, and evaluation,

    F. Ben Aissa, M. Hamdi, M. Zaied, and M. Mejdoub, "An overview of GA N-DeepFakes detection: Proposal, improvement, and evaluation," Multimedia Tools and Applications , vol. 83, no. 11, pp. 32343 –32365, Sep

  27. [35]

    Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and oppo rtunities,

    M. Mustak, J. Salminen, M. Mäntymäki, A. Rahman, and Y. K. Dwivedi, "Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and oppo rtunities," Journal of Business Research , vol. 154, p. 113368, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113368. Available: https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...

    2023

  28. [36]

    Ethical C hallenges and Solutions of Generative AI: An Interdisciplinary Perspective,

    M. Al -kfairy, D. Mustafa, N. Kshetri, M. Insiew, and O. A lfandi, "Ethical C hallenges and Solutions of Generative AI: An Interdisciplinary Perspective," Informatics, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 58, 2024.[Online].Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11030058

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Understanding Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: Techniqu es, Challenges, and Future Directions,

    S. Agarwal et al., "Understanding Audiovisual Deepfake Detection: Techniqu es, Challenges, and Future Directions," arXiv preprint , 2024. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/html/2411.07650v1

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    NeuWigs: A Neural Dynamic Model for Volumetric Hair Capture and Animation,

    Z. Wang et al., "NeuWigs: A Neural Dynamic Model for Volumetric Hair Capture and Animation," arXiv preprint, Dec. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.00613

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Tackling Bad Hair Days in Human Image Synthesi s,

    Unite AI, "Tackling Bad Hair Days in Human Image Synthesi s," Unite AI, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://unite.ai/tackling -bad-hair-days -in- human-image-synthesis

    2024

  32. [40]

    Introducing Gen -3 A lpha: Next-Generation Video Creation,

    Runway, "Introducing Gen -3 A lpha: Next-Generation Video Creation," RunwayML Research, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://runwayml.com/research/introducing -gen-3-alpha

    2024

  33. [41]

    Generating Long Videos of Dy namic Scenes,

    T. Brooks, J. Hellsten, M. Aittala, T. -C. Wang, T. Aila, J. Lehtinen, M. - Y. Liu, A. A. Efros, and T. Karras, " Generating Long Videos of Dy namic Scenes," arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.03429, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.03429

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Generating Temporally Consistent Stable Diffusion Video Directly in the Latent Space,

    Metaphysic AI, "Generating Temporally Consistent Stable Diffusion Video Directly in the Latent Space," Metaphysic Blog, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://blog.metaphysic.ai/generating -temporally-consistent -stable- diffusion-video-directly-in-the-latent-space/

    2024

  35. [43]

    Deepfakes, Social Media, and the 2020 Election,

    D. McCabe and K. Harris, "Deepfakes, Social Media, and the 2020 Election," Brookings Institution, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://brookings. edu/articles/deepfakes -social-media-and-the-2020-election/

    2020

  36. [44]

    Fraudsters Use AI to Mimic CEO's Voice in Unusual Cybercrime Case,

    C. Stupp, "Fraudsters Use AI to Mimic CEO's Voice in Unusual Cybercrime Case," The Wall Street Journal, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://wsj.com/articles/fraudsters -use-ai-to-mimic-ceos -voice-in-unusual - cybercrime-case -11567157402

    2019

  37. [45]

    Threat of deepfakes to the criminal justice system: a systematic review,

    M. P. Sandoval, M. de Almeida Vau, J. Solaas, et al. , "Threat of deepfakes to the criminal justice system: a systematic review," Crime Science , vol. 13, p. 41, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163 -024- 00239-1

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    DARPA explores cutting -edge AI technologies to counter deepfake threats,

    DARPA, “DARPA explores cutting -edge AI technologies to counter deepfake threats,” DARPA, Mar. 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://darpa.mil/news -events/2024-03-14. [Accessed: Nov. 29, 2024]

    2024

  39. [47]

    Deepfakes: current and future trends,

    Á. F. Gambín, A. Yazidi, A. Vasilakos, et al., "Deepfakes: current and future trends," Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 57, no. 64, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462 -023-10679-x. [Accessed: Nov. 29, 2024]

    2024 doi

  40. [48]

    Fake News, Disinformation, and Deepfakes: Leveraging Distributed Ledger Technologies and Blockchain to Combat Digital Deception and Counterfeit Reality,

    P. Fraga-Lamas and T. M. Fernández-Caramés, "Fake News, Disinformation, and Deepfakes: Leveraging Distributed Ledger Technologies and Blockchain to Combat Digital Deception and Counterfeit Reality," IT Professional , vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 53–59, Mar.–Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1109/MITP...

    2020 doi

  41. [2023]

    doi: 10.1007/s11042 -023-16761-4

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.