Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Spin Dynamics and Light-Induced Effects in EuZn$_2$P$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that visible light broadens the spin resonance of EuZn2P2 and that the same crystal shows a photovoltaic response with responsivity 3.78 A/W.

desk verdict Real new data (photoresponse, light-ESR) in a well-characterized compound, but the photomagnetic claim needs controls before it can be taken seriously. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.07681 v1 pith:ICE5M3JA submitted 2025-06-09 cond-mat.str-el

M. Dutra , G. G. Vasques , P. C. Sabino , J. G. Dias , J. F. Oliveira , M. A. A. Heringer , M. Cabrera-Baez , E. Baggio-Saitovitch
show 3 more authors
A. R. V. Benvenho M. A. Avila J. Munevar
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords EuZn2P2ZintlphaseelectronspinresonancemagneticpolaronphotomagneticeffectphotovoltaicantiferromagnetismMössbauerspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that light can change the magnetism and spin dynamics of the antiferromagnetic Zintl compound EuZn2P2, and that the same material works as a photodetector. The experimental core is electron spin resonance (ESR): illuminating the crystal with 365, 462, and 625 nm light slightly broadens the ESR line and raises its intensity, which the authors interpret as a photomagnetic response, together with transport measurements at 686 nm that show a clear photovoltaic current with responsivity 3.78 A/W and detectivity $1.39 \times 10^{11}$ Jones. Supporting characterization—$^{151}$Eu Mössbauer spectroscopy, magnetic susceptibility, and angle-dependent ESR—establishes that Eu is divalent, that the moments order antiferromagnetically at $T_N = 23.5$ K at an angle of $\theta = 46(3)^\circ$ to the c-axis, and that anisotropic magnetic polarons form near the transition. A sympathetic reader would care because a small, light-responsive antiferromagnetic intermetallic that also detects light would connect magnetic and optoelectronic behavior in a single crystal, a combination that is uncommon outside molecular magnets.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the electron spin resonance (ESR) line shape, fit with a Lorentzian admixture of absorption and dispersion (Eq. 1) to extract the linewidth $\Delta H$ and g-shift $\Delta g$. $\Delta H(T)$ and $\Delta g(T)$ carry the spin-dynamics story: a positive $\Delta g$ for $H \parallel ab$ is read through $\Delta g = J_{fs}\,\eta(E_F)$ as ferromagnetic polarization of spin carriers around Eu$^{2+}$, forming anisotropic magnetic polarons, and the angular dependence $\Delta H(\phi)$ is decomposed into 2D and 3D fluctuation terms (Eqs. 4 and 5), with $C_{3D}$ dominant. Under illumination the same $\Delta H(\phi)$ analysis shows broadening, which is the evidence for the photomagnetic effect. The photovoltaic claim is carried by the I–V and transient photocurrent curves, quantified by the standard photodetector formulas for $R$, $D^*$, and $\eta_{\mathrm{external}}$.

What would settle it

Measure the sample temperature in situ during the ESR measurements under 365, 462, and 625 nm illumination at fixed power; if the illumination-induced $\Delta H$ broadening equals the broadening observed when the crystal is heated to the same temperature in the dark, the photomagnetic interpretation is refuted and the effect is thermal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is twofold. First, EuZn2P2 single crystals show a photovoltaic effect: under 686 nm illumination the current rises from a negligible dark value at zero bias, and at 0.5 V bias the photocurrent reaches roughly 12 µA; the extracted figures of merit are $R = 3.78$ A/W, $D^* = 1.39 \times 10^{11}$ Jones, and $\eta_{\mathrm{external}} \approx 6\%$. Second, ESR under illumination shows a small but clear broadening of $\Delta H$ and an increase in resonance intensity, while the g-factor stays essentially unchanged; the authors take this as evidence that light influences the magnetization, with photoinduced surface electrons contributing to the ESR signal. These light effects sit on top of a detailed static picture: divalent Eu moments with antiferromagnetic order at 23.5 K, a positive g-shift for $H \parallel ab$ indicating ferromagnetic polarization of spin carriers, and an angular-dependent linewidth dominated by the three-dimensional fluctuation term $C_{3D}$. The paper's conclusion is that EuZn2P2 hosts magnetic polarons, a photomagnetic response, and photodetector behavior in one intermetallic crystal.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that light changes the magnetism of EuZn2P2 depends on the assumption that the ESR line broadening under illumination is a magnetic response, not heating of the crystal by the laser or a light-induced change in surface conductivity that alters the microwave skin depth.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the photomagnetic reading is right, EuZn2P2 becomes a test bed for light control of antiferromagnetic order in a Zintl intermetallic, a regime currently dominated by molecular and oxide systems.
  • The measured photovoltaic figures ($R = 3.78$ A/W, $D^* = 1.39 \times 10^{11}$ Jones at 686 nm) put single-crystal EuZn2P2 in the range of functional visible-light photodetectors, with zero-bias operation.
  • The ESR and resistivity data tie the low-temperature insulating regime to percolating magnetic polarons; if correct, this explains the transport anomaly near $T_N$ without invoking mixed valence.
  • A light-tunable ESR line implies that illumination changes the magnetic environment, so transport, which is magnetically mediated, should also respond to light.
  • The combination of magnetic order, polaron formation, and photoresponse in one compound suggests that photoexcitation could tune magnetotransport, not just the ESR line.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the light-induced broadening is the only evidence for photomagnetism, a natural next step is to record the sample temperature during illumination; if the broadening tracks the dark $\Delta H(T)$ curve at the same temperature, the effect is thermal rather than magnetic.
  • If the g-factor is insensitive because light only reaches surface layers, then thinner crystals or higher surface-to-volume ratios should show larger relative changes in $\Delta H$ and ESR intensity under the same illumination.
  • A nonmagnetic analog without Eu moments (for example, a Ba- or Sr-based Zintl phosphide with the same structure) would be a control: if it shows the same illumination-induced ESR broadening, the effect does not require Eu magnetism.
  • The zero-bias photocurrent implies a built-in field, possibly from surface band bending or contact asymmetry; spatially resolved photocurrent mapping could locate the junction and clarify the mechanism.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a multi-technique study of the Zintl phosphide EuZn2P2: Sn-flux single-crystal growth, PXRD structure refinement, magnetic susceptibility, 151Eu Mössbauer spectroscopy, temperature- and angle-dependent ESR, ESR under visible illumination, and room-temperature photocurrent measurements. The authors claim antiferromagnetic order at TN = 23.5 K, Eu2+ valence, a canted Eu moment with θ = 46(3)°, evidence for anisotropic magnetic polarons from positive g-shifts and ESR linewidth behavior, a dominant three-dimensional spin-fluctuation component C3D, a light-induced broadening of the ESR linewidth that is interpreted as a photomagnetic effect, and a photovoltaic effect with R = 3.78 A/W, D* = 1.39 × 10^11 Jones, and η ≈ 6%.

Significance. If fully supported, the paper would provide the first report of a photovoltaic effect in a Eu-based CaAl2Si2-type single crystal and one of the very few examples of a photomagnetic response in an intermetallic compound, making it of genuine interest to the quantum-materials community. The manuscript has clear strengths: the crystal-growth and structural work is standard and credible, the Mössbauer analysis is carefully tied to the Eu2+ state and moment orientation, and the photovoltaic effect is supported by I-V and transient photocurrent data that show a real light-induced current. However, the headline claim that light modifies magnetism currently rests on ESR changes for which thermal and surface-conductivity artifacts have not been excluded, and the quantitative photodetector figures of merit lack the active-area input and error propagation needed to be reproducible. The polaron conclusion is plausible but is inferred from the same ESR dataset without independent evidence. These issues are localizable and addressable, so the result is worth revising rather than rejecting.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section IV.B and Fig. 8] The central claim that light affects magnetism rests on the observed ESR line broadening and intensity increase, but no control experiment excludes thermal or electronic artifacts. The manuscript does not report the sample temperature during illumination, a laser power dependence, or the stability of the cavity coupling and the admixture parameter α in Eq. (1) when the light is on. In a semiconductor, photoinduced carriers can change the microwave skin depth and cavity loading, producing apparent broadening and intensity changes without any magnetic origin, and even a few kelvin of heating could generate a broadening comparable to that observed given the steep dark ΔH(T) in Fig. 4(b). I request a power-dependence study at one wavelength, an in-situ temperature measurement or estimate, and a control on a nonmagnetic isostructural analog such as BaZn2P2.
  2. [Section III.E and Eqs. (7)-(9)] The photodetector metrics R = 3.78 A/W, D* = 1.39 × 10^11 Jones, and η ≈ 6% are presented without the active area S, the incident power calibration, or uncertainty estimates. Since Eq. (8) explicitly depends on S, the D* value cannot be reproduced without it, and the comparison with 'good performance' is not quantitative. Please report S, the measurement geometry, the beam size, and propagated uncertainties for all three figures of merit.
  3. [Section IV.A and Conclusions] The magnetic-polaron scenario is presented as a main conclusion, but it is inferred from the same ESR measurements through the literature relation Eq. (6), the linewidth behavior, and the A/B ratio, with no independent measurement on these crystals (e.g., resistivity, Hall effect, or specific heat) and no quantitative model of the polaronic lineshape. The discussion itself says the formation 'appears highly plausible,' while the Abstract and Conclusions state it more definitively. Please either soften the polaron claim to a hypothesis supported by the ESR trends or add independent evidence from the same crystals.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption for panel (d) gives the laser wavelength as 696 nm while the main text and the figure label say 686 nm; please correct the inconsistency.
  2. [Section II, Methods] The illumination intensity for the I-V measurements is given as '1000 lumens,' which is a luminous-flux unit, not the optical power needed to evaluate Eqs. (7)-(9); please specify the optical power and beam geometry.
  3. [Eq. (6)] The notation in Eq. (6) is not fully defined: J_fs is introduced as an exchange parameter and η(E_F) as a density of states, but the units and the assumed proportionality are not stated. A brief definition would help readers assess the sign arguments in Section IV.A.
  4. [Fig. 6] The resistance data in Fig. 6 are discussed as supporting the polaron picture, but the text does not make clear whether these resistance measurements were performed in this work or are reproduced from Refs. [32] or [35]; please clarify the data provenance.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation found: all load-bearing quantities are measured directly or fitted from data, and the interpretative claims are not used as inputs to those fits.

full rationale

All load-bearing quantities are obtained from independent measurements and fits rather than from the claims they are used to support. The ESR parameters ΔH and Δg are extracted from the Lorentzian-admixture fit of Eq. (1); the angular dependence is then modeled with Eqs. (3)-(5). The light-induced broadening is a directly observed change in the fitted linewidth, not a quantity manufactured from the photomagnetic interpretation. Similarly, the photodetector metrics R, D*, and η_external are computed from measured I_photo, I_dark, P, and S using Eqs. (7)-(9), and none of these equations presupposes the conclusion that the material is a good photodetector. The polaron and photomagnetic statements are inferences drawn from the ESR data using external literature relations such as Δg = J_fs η(E_F), but the measured Δg values are not constructed to force those inferences. The few references involving members of the present group ([33] and [34]) supply a fitting form and a comparative ESR study; they are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem, nor as the sole justification of the central claim, so they are not load-bearing in a circular way. The paper itself explicitly flags the need for further confirmation, stating that 'further experiments are necessary to confirm and detail its occurrence,' which is an honest limitation rather than a circular step. The possible influence of laser heating or surface conductivity on the ESR linewidth is an experimental-control concern about whether the photomagnetic interpretation is correct, not a demonstration that the observed broadening was derived from that interpretation. Therefore, no step in the paper's derivation chain reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard fits to susceptibility, Mössbauer, and ESR data plus several interpretive premises. The most load-bearing assumptions are that the ESR line shape model is correct and that the light-induced linewidth broadening is magnetic rather than thermal or electronic in origin. No new fundamental constants or entities are introduced; the magnetic polaron is adopted from prior work, and surface photoinduced electrons are invoked without direct evidence.

free parameters (6)
  • Curie-Weiss effective moments and temperatures (μ_eff^H||ab, μ_eff^H||c, θ_CW^H||ab, θ_CW^H||c) = 7.85(9) μB, 8.11(7) μB; 28.1(7) K, 27.9(8) K
    Obtained by linear fits to inverse susceptibility between 100 and 300 K; used to infer short-range FM interactions in the ab planes (Section III.B).
  • Mössbauer hyperfine parameters (δ, ΔEQ, Γ, B_hf, θ) = δ = -11.4(1) mm/s, ΔEQ = 2.5(4) mm/s, Γ = 2.6(7) mm/s, B_hf = 25.2(1) T, θ = 46(3)°
    From full-Hamiltonian fits of the 300 K and 10 K spectra; the 10 K fit fixes ΔEQ at the 300 K value (Section III.C).
  • ESR Lorentzian admixture fit parameters per spectrum (H0, T2, α, χ0) = Not tabulated in the paper.
    Each ESR spectrum is fitted with Eq. 1 to extract ΔH and Δg; the individual fit values and their uncertainties are not reported (Section III.D).
  • g_parallel and g_perp from angular g(φ) fit = g_parallel = 1.949, g_perp = 2.013
    Fitted with Eq. 3; their difference is used to conclude FM interactions are stronger in the ab plane and to infer signs of Δg(φ) (Section III.D).
  • C3D and C2D coefficients for ΔH(φ) = C3D = 107 ± 10, C2D = 55 ± 2
    Fitted using Eqs. 4 and 5; C3D dominance is the basis for the claim of three-dimensional spin fluctuations and strong interlayer coupling (Section III.D).
  • Effective area S for photodetector detectivity = Not reported in the paper.
    Equation 8 for D* requires S, but no value is given; the crystal size is stated as roughly 1 x 1 x 0.5 mm, yet the active area and any correction are unspecified (Sections II and IV.B).
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Eu2+ in the half-filled 4f7 configuration does not contribute to the electric field gradient, so Vzz is purely lattice in origin and is taken parallel to the c-axis.
    Used to justify fixing the room-temperature quadrupole splitting as an input to the 10 K fit and to interpret the Mössbauer angle θ = 46(3)° as the moment canting from the c-axis (Section III.C).
  • domain assumption No structural phase transition occurs between 300 K and 10 K, so the quadrupole splitting measured at 300 K remains valid at 10 K.
    The 10 K Mössbauer spectrum is fitted with ΔEQ fixed from the 300 K spectrum (Section III.C).
  • domain assumption The g-shift of Eu2+ is described by Δg = J_fs η(E_F), where J_fs is the exchange interaction with s-like carriers and η(E_F) is the density of states at the Fermi energy.
    This relation (Eq. 6) converts the sign of the measured Δg into a statement about ferromagnetic or antiferromagnetic polarization of spin carriers, which underpins the magnetic polaron scenario (Section IV.A).
  • domain assumption The ESR line shape is accurately described by the Lorentzian admixture of absorption and dispersion given in Eq. 1, with parameters H0, T2, and alpha.
    All temperature- and angle-dependent ΔH and Δg values are extracted from fits to this model (Section III.D).
  • domain assumption The angular dependence of ΔH can be decomposed into 2D and 3D spin-fluctuation contributions following Eqs. 4 and 5.
    The claim that C3D dominates and that interlayer coupling is strong rests on these literature models and on the fitted coefficients (Section III.D).
  • ad hoc to paper Light-induced changes in the ESR spectrum are magnetic in origin rather than thermal or surface-conductivity artifacts.
    This premise is not stated or tested; it is the load-bearing assumption behind the photomagnetic interpretation (Section IV.B, Figure 8).
  • ad hoc to paper Under illumination, photoinduced electrons are generated only in a few surface layers, so the bulk g-factor is expected to remain unchanged while the ESR intensity increases.
    Invoked after the fact to explain why Δg shows no significant variation under light while the ESR intensity increases (Section IV.B).
invented entities (1)
  • Surface photoinduced electrons in EuZn2P2
    purpose: Explains the increase in ESR intensity under illumination and the absence of a g-factor change by localizing the light effect to a few surface layers.
    No surface-sensitive measurement or carrier-density estimate is provided; the explanation is introduced after the fact in Section IV.B and is not independently verified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin Dynamics and Light-Induced Effects in EuZn$_2$P$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ICE5M3JA

@misc{pith2026250607681,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin Dynamics and Light-Induced Effects in EuZn$_2$P$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ICE5M3JA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.07681}
}
abstract

The magnetic spin dynamics and optical properties of EuZn$_2$P$_2$ are studied. Single crystals grown by the Sn-flux method crystallize in the $P\overline{3}m1$ (No.~164) space group and order antiferromagnetically at $T_N=23.5$~K. $^{151}$Eu M\"ossbauer spectroscopy confirms the presence of the Eu$^{2+}$ oxidation state only and the magnetic moment angle relative to the $c$-axis is $\theta=46(3)$\textdegree. Temperature-dependent electron spin resonance (ESR) measurements reveal that spin-spin interactions predominantly govern the spin relaxation mechanisms, as evidenced by the linewidth behavior ($\Delta H$). Positive $g$-shifts ($\Delta g)$ for $H \parallel ab$ indicate the presence of local electron polarization. The ESR data support the formation of anisotropic magnetic polarons, which trap spin carriers and contribute to increased electrical resistance. Angular-dependent ESR spectra at room temperature display anisotropic behavior in both $\Delta g(\phi)$ and $\Delta H(\phi)$, with a dominant three-dimensional component $C_{3D}$, indicative of robust interlayer coupling and antiferromagnetic fluctuations. Under light illumination, a small broadening of $\Delta H$ is observed. Furthermore, a photovoltaic effect is identified in EuZn$_2$P$_2$, with photodetector performance metrics suggesting promising capabilities for future optoelectronic devices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.07681 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Rietveld refinement was performed using the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. a) Magnetic susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. a) M¨ossbauer spectra for EuZn [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. a) Temperature-dependent ESR spectra for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. a) and b) are the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. a) Integrated absorption and b) Absorption spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. a) ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Engineering a Correlated Narrow-Gap Semiconductor: Effects of Ga Substitution in EuZn$_2$P$_2$

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Gallium substitution in EuZn2P2 lowers resistivity by roughly two orders of magnitude, reduces the activation gap to about 63 meV, and preserves a ~90% negative magnetoresistance at 45 K.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Light affects the magnetic behavior (by the ∆ H light-induced broadening) of EuZn 2P2

    work page

  2. [2]

    The g-factor, however, does not show any significant variation at least for the g⊥ component (Fig

    Photoinduced electrons at the surface may play an active role in modulating the ESR signal. The g-factor, however, does not show any significant variation at least for the g⊥ component (Fig. 8b). This negligible change in ∆ g is likely due to the limited pen- etration depth of the radiation. Since we use relatively low-energy photons, the light is not abl...

    work page arXiv

  3. [3]

    Freer, D

    R. Freer, D. Ekren, T. Ghosh, K. Biswas, P. Qiu, S. Wan, L. Chen, S. Han, C. Fu, T. Zhu, et al. , Key properties of inorganic thermoelectric materials—tables (version 1), Journal of Physics: Energy 4, 022002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    S. M. Kauzlarich, Zintl phases: From curiosities to impactful materials, Chemistry of Materials 35, 7355 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Shuai, J

    J. Shuai, J. Mao, S. Song, Q. Zhang, G. Chen, and Z. Ren, Recent progress and future challenges on ther- moelectric zintl materials, Materials Today Physics 1, 74 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    J.-Z. Ma, S. Nie, C. Yi, J. Jandke, T. Shang, M.-Y. Yao, M. Naamneh, L. Yan, Y. Sun, A. Chikina, et al. , Spin fluctuation induced weyl semimetal state in the paramag- netic phase of EuCd 2As2, Science advances 5, eaaw4718 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    exhibit colossal magnetoresistance (CMR) [5, 6, 8] and antiferromagnetic order at low temperatures. The observation of CMR in these materials is remarkable because it is usually observed in mixed-valence per- ovskites materials, which can exhibit ferromagnetism as- sociated with double exchange or Jahn-Teller distortions ∗ Corresponding author: julian.mun...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    J. H. Westbrook and R. L. Fleischer, Intermetallic com- pounds: principles and practice, (No Title) (1995). 9

    work page 1995

Show all 73 references
  1. [9]

    Z.-C. Wang, J. D. Rogers, X. Yao, R. Nichols, K. Atay, B. Xu, J. Franklin, I. Sochnikov, P. J. Ryan, D. Haskel, et al., Colossal magnetoresistance without mixed valence in a layered phosphide crystal, Advanced Materials 33, 2005755 (2021)

    2021

  2. [10]

    S. Luo, Y. Xu, F. Du, L. Yang, Y. Chen, C. Cao, Y. Song, and H. Yuan, Colossal magnetoresistance and topological phase transition in EuZn 2As2, Physical Review B 108, 205140 (2023)

    2023

  3. [11]

    F. Du, L. Yang, Z. Nie, N. Wu, Y. Li, S. Luo, Y. Chen, D. Su, M. Smidman, Y. Shi, et al., Consecutive topologi- cal phase transitions and colossal magnetoresistance in a magnetic topological semimetal, npj Quantum Materials 7, 65 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    Littlewood, Transport and magnetoresistance in low carrier density ferromagnets, Acta Physica Polonica A 97, 7 (2000)

    P. Littlewood, Transport and magnetoresistance in low carrier density ferromagnets, Acta Physica Polonica A 97, 7 (2000)

    2000

  5. [13]

    Zhang, F

    H. Zhang, F. Du, X. Zheng, S. Luo, Y. Wu, H. Zheng, S. Cui, Z. Sun, Z. Liu, D. Shen, et al. , Electronic band reconstruction across the insulator-metal transition in colossally magnetoresistive EuCd2P2, Physical Review B 108, L241115 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Sunko, Y

    V. Sunko, Y. Sun, M. Vranas, C. C. Homes, C. Lee, E. Donoway, Z.-C. Wang, S. Balguri, M. B. Mahendru, A. Ruiz, et al. , Spin-carrier coupling induced ferromag- netism and giant resistivity peak in EuCd 2P2, Physical Review B 107, 144404 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Heinrich, T

    E. Heinrich, T. Posske, and B. Flebus, Topological mag- netic phase transition in Eu-based A-type antiferromag- nets, Physical Review B 106, 214402 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    D. J. Marsh, K. C. Fong, E. W. Lentz, L. ˇSmejkal, and M. N. Ali, Proposal to detect dark matter using ax- ionic topological antiferromagnets, Physical Review Let- ters 123, 121601 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Ishiwata and K

    K. Ishiwata and K. Nomura, Collective excitations in magnetic topological insulators and axion dark matter search, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09705 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Sch¨ utte-Engel, D

    J. Sch¨ utte-Engel, D. J. Marsh, A. J. Millar, A. Sekine, F. Chadha-Day, S. Hoof, M. N. Ali, K. C. Fong, E. Hardy, and L. ˇSmejkal, Axion quasiparticles for axion dark mat- ter detection, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2021 (08), 066

    2021

  11. [19]

    Sekine and K

    A. Sekine and K. Nomura, Axion electrodynamics in topological materials, Journal of Applied Physics 129 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Manzoor, D

    M. Manzoor, D. Behera, R. Sharma, M. W. Iqbal, S. Mukherjee, R. Khenata, S. Bin-Omran, T. Alshahrani, E. El Shiekh, and T. Ouahrani, Structural, electronic, op- tical, and thermoelectric studies on zintl SrCd2Pn2 (Pn= P/As) compounds for solar cell applications: A first prin- ...

    2023

  13. [21]

    Z. Yuan, D. Dahliah, M. R. Hasan, G. Kassa, A. Pike, S. Quadir, R. Claes, C. Chandler, Y. Xiong, V. Kyveryga, et al., Discovery of the zintl-phosphide BaCd2P2 as a long carrier lifetime and stable solar absorber, Joule 8, 1412 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    G. Souadi, First principles investigations of optoelec- tronic and thermoelectric properties of novel BaMg 2X2 (X= P, As, Sb) alloys for renewable energy applications, Inorganic Chemistry Communications , 112768 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Khireddine, A

    A. Khireddine, A. Bouhemadou, S. Maabed, S. Bin- Omran, R. Khenata, and Y. Al-Douri, Elastic, electronic, optical and thermoelectric properties of the novel zintl- phase Ba2ZnP2, Solid State Sciences 128, 106893 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    T. Amin, A. H. Reshak, Z. Zada, I. ur Rahman, D. Ali, A. M. Khan, A. Laref, M. M. Ramli, et al. , Structural, opto-electronic and transport properties of zintl com- pound YbZn2Y2 (Y= P, As, Sb, Bi), Engineered Science 31, 1258 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Kirilyuk, A

    A. Kirilyuk, A. V. Kimel, and T. Rasing, Ultrafast opti- cal manipulation of magnetic order, Reviews of Modern Physics 82, 2731 (2010)

    2010

  18. [26]

    Kabychenkov, Magnetic phase transitions in a light wave, Sov

    A. Kabychenkov, Magnetic phase transitions in a light wave, Sov. Phys. JETP 73, 672 (1991)

    1991

  19. [27]

    Kimel, A

    A. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, P. Usachev, R. Pisarev, A. Bal- bashov, and T. Rasing, Ultrafast non-thermal control of magnetization by instantaneous photomagnetic pulses, Nature 435, 655 (2005)

    2005

  20. [28]

    Dobrovolsky and V

    V. Dobrovolsky and V. Rossokhaty, Planar photo- magnetic effect soi sensors for various applications with low detection limit, in Science and Technology of Semiconductor-On-Insulator Structures and Devices Operating in a Harsh Environment: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Rese...

    2004

  21. [29]

    Barrera, D

    G. Barrera, D. Martella, F. Celegato, N. Fuochi, M. Co ¨ ısson, C. Parmeggiani, D. S. Wiersma, and P. Tib- erto, Light-controlled magnetic properties: An energy- efficient opto-mechanical control over magnetic films by liquid crystalline networks, Advanced Science 11, 2408273 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    A. V. Kimel and M. Li, Writing magnetic memory with ultrashort light pulses, Nature Reviews Materials 4, 189 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    B. H. Toby and R. B. Von Dreele, Gsas-ii: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography soft- ware package, Journal of Applied Crystallography 46, 544 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    Berry, V

    T. Berry, V. J. Stewart, B. W. Redemann, C. Lygouras, N. Varnava, D. Vanderbilt, and T. M. McQueen, Dipolar magnetic interactions and A-type antiferromagnetic or- der in the zintl phase insulator EuZn 2P2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.12739 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Grandjean and G

    F. Grandjean and G. J. Long, M¨ ossbauer spectroscopy of europium-containing compounds, in M¨ ossbauer Spec- troscopy Applied to Inorganic Chemistry (Springer, 1989) pp. 513–597

    1989

  26. [34]

    M. A. Ahmida et al. , Theoretical review of m¨ ossbauer effect, hyperfine interactions parameters and the valence fluctuations in eu systems, Journal of Applied Mathe- matics and Physics 7, 254 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Rybicki, K

    D. Rybicki, K. Kom¸ edera, J. Przewo´ znik, L. Gondek, C. Kapusta, K. Podg´ orska, W. Tabi´ s, J.˙Zukrowski, L. M. Tran, M. Babij, et al. , Ambient-and high-pressure stud- ies of structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of single-crystal EuZn 2P2, Physical Review B 110,...

    2024

  28. [36]

    P. F. S. Rosa, W. Iwamoto, L. Holanda, R. Ribeiro, P. Pagliuso, C. Rettori, and M. Avila, Magnetic po- laron effect in Sr 8−xEuxGa16Ge30 clathrates probed by electron spin resonance, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 87, 224414 (2013)

    2013

  29. [37]

    Cabrera-Baez, A

    M. Cabrera-Baez, A. Naranjo-Uribe, J. Osorio-Guill´ en, C. Rettori, and M. Avila, Multiband electronic char- acterization of the complex intermetallic cage system Y1−xGdxCo2Zn20, Physical Review B 92, 214414 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    M. S. Cook, E. A. Peterson, C. S. Kengle, E. Kennedy, J. Sheeran, C. Girod, G. Freitas, S. M. Greer, P. Abba- monte, P. Pagliuso, et al., Magnetic polaron formation in EuZn2P2, arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.05494 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Sichelschmidt, P

    J. Sichelschmidt, P. Chailloleau, S. Krebber, A. E. Mard, C. Krellner, and K. Kliemt, Electron spin resonance of eu on triangular layers in EuT2P2 (T= Mn, Zn, Cd), arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.06060 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Nikolic, A

    D. Nikolic, A. Vasic, I. Fetahovic, K. Stankovic, and P. Osmokrovic, Photodiode behavior in radiation envi- ronment, Scientific Publications of the State University of Novi Pazar Series A 3, 27 (2011)

    2011

  33. [41]

    P. Rosa, C. Adriano, T. Garitezi, R. Ribeiro, Z. Fisk, and P. Pagliuso, Electron spin resonance of the in- termetallic antiferromagnet EuIn 2As2, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 86, 094408 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    Abragam and B

    A. Abragam and B. Bleaney, Electron Paramagnetic Res- onance of Transition Ions , International series of mono- graphs on physics (Clarendon P., 1970)

    1970

  35. [43]

    D. R. Yakovlev and W. Ossau, Magnetic polarons, in Introduction to the physics of diluted magnetic semicon- ductors (Springer, 2010) pp. 221–262

    2010

  36. [44]

    J. C. Souza, S. Thomas, E. Bauer, J. Thompson, F. Ron- ning, P. Pagliuso, and P. Rosa, Microscopic probe of mag- netic polarons in antiferromagnetic Eu 5In2Sb6, Physical Review B 105, 035135 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    M. Yang, H. Zhou, and J. Wang, Topological insulators photodetectors: Preparation, advances and application challenges, Materials Today Communications 33, 104190 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    U. Enz, W. Lems, R. Metselaar, P. Rijnierse, and R. Teale, Photomagnetic effects, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 5, 467 (1969)

    1969

  39. [47]

    Garnier, J.-R

    D. Garnier, J.-R. Jim´ enez, Y. Li, J. Von Bardeleben, Y. Journaux, T. Augenstein, E. Moos, M. Gamer, F. Breher, and R. Lescou¨ ezec, K ⊂ [F eII (T p)(CN )3]4[Co III (pzT p)]3[Co II (pzT p)]: a neutral soluble model complex of photomagnetic prussian blue analogues, Chemical sc...

    2016

  40. [48]

    J. M. Herrera, V. Marvaud, M. Verdaguer, J. Mar- rot, M. Kalisz, and C. Mathoniere, Reversible photoin- duced magnetic properties in the heptanuclear complex [MoIV (CN)2(CN-CuL)6]8+: A Photomagnetic High-Spin Molecule, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 43, 5468 (2004)

    2004

  41. [49]

    C. J. ´ aO’Connor et al. , Electric, magnetic, and pho- tomagnetic properties of the amorphous metallic spin- glass Ni3(SbTe3)2, Journal of Materials Chemistry 2, 829 (1992)

    1992

  42. [50]

    B. Wu, L. Ren, C. J. O’Connor, J. Tang, J.-S. Jung, J. Ferr´ e, and J.-P. Jamet, Photo-induced mag- netic behavior in the amorphous spin-glass material Co3(SbTe3)2, Journal of materials research 9, 909 (1994)

    1994

  43. [51]

    C. J. O’Connor and J. F. Noonan, Photo-induced mag- netic bubbles in the spin glass alloy Fe2SnTe4, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 48, 303 (1987)

    1987

  44. [52]

    X. Chen, W. Yang, J.-Y. Lu, Z. Zhou, Z. Ren, G.-H. Cao, S. Dong, and Z.-C. Wang, Carrier-induced transi- tion from antiferromagnetic insulator to ferromagnetic metal in the layered phosphide EuZn 2P2, Physical Re- view B 109, L180410 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Krebber, M

    S. Krebber, M. Kopp, C. Garg, K. Kummer, J. Sichelschmidt, S. Schulz, G. Poelchen, M. Mende, K. Warawa, M. D. Thomson, et al. , Colossal magne- toresistance in EuZn 2P2 and its electronic and magnetic structure, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.14539 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Z. Yang, X. Bao, S. Tan, and Y. Zhang, Magnetic po- laron conduction in the colossal magnetoresistance ma- terial Fe 1−xCdxCr2S4, Physical Review B 69, 144407 (2004)

    2004

  47. [55]

    J. Ying, L. Tang, F. Chen, X. Chen, and V. V. Struzhkin, Coexistence of metallic and insulating channels in com- pressed YbB6, Physical Review B 97, 121101 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    L. Li, K. Sun, C. Kurdak, and J. Allen, Emergent mys- tery in the kondo insulator samarium hexaboride, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 463 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    D. Y. Usachov, S. Krebber, K. A. Bokai, A. V. Tarasov, M. Kopp, C. Garg, A. Virovets, J. M¨ uller, M. Mende, G. Poelchen, et al. , Magnetism, heat capacity, and elec- tronic structure of EuCd 2P2 in view of its colossal mag- netoresistance, Physical Review B 109, 104421 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    P. Rosa, Y. Xu, M. Rahn, J. Souza, S. Kushwaha, L. Veiga, A. Bombardi, S. Thomas, M. Janoschek, E. Bauer, et al. , Colossal magnetoresistance in a non- symmorphic antiferromagnetic insulator, npj Quantum Materials 5, 52 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    Feher and A

    G. Feher and A. Kip, Electron spin resonance absorp- tion in metals. i. experimental, Physical Review 98, 337 (1955)

    1955

  52. [60]

    K. C. Kao, Dielectric phenomena in solids (Elsevier, 2004)

    2004

  53. [61]

    S. R. Goldman, K. Kalikstein, and B. Kramer, Dember- effect theory, Journal of Applied Physics49, 2849 (1978)

    1978

  54. [62]

    Kugel, A

    K. Kugel, A. Rakhmanov, A. Sboychakov, M. Y. Ka- gan, and S. Ogarkov, The structure of magnetic polarons in doped antiferromagnetic insulators, Physica B: Con- densed Matter 403, 1353 (2008)

    2008

  55. [63]

    Abragam and B

    A. Abragam and B. Bleaney, Electron paramagnetic res- onance of transition ions (OUP Oxford, 2012)

    2012

  56. [64]

    Ghosh, C

    S. Ghosh, C. Lane, F. Ronning, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thompson, J.-X. Zhu, P. Rosa, and S. M. Thomas, Colos- sal piezoresistance in narrow-gap Eu 5In2Sb6, Physical Review B 106, 045110 (2022)

    2022

  57. [65]

    Majumdar and P

    P. Majumdar and P. Littlewood, Magnetoresistance in mn pyrochlore: electrical transport in a low carrier den- sity ferromagnet, Physical review letters 81, 1314 (1998)

    1998

  58. [66]

    Y. Xu, Z. Song, Z. Wang, H. Weng, and X. Dai, Higher- order topology of the axion insulator EuIn 2As2, Physical review letters 122, 256402 (2019)

    2019

  59. [67]

    Singh, S

    K. Singh, S. Dan, A. Ptok, T. Zaleski, O. Pavlosiuk, P. Wi´ sniewski, and D. Kaczorowski, Superexchange in- teraction in insulating EuZn2P2, Physical Review B 108, 054402 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    G. M. Pierantozzi, A. De Vita, C. Bigi, X. Gui, H.- J. Tien, D. Mondal, F. Mazzola, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, G. Vinai, et al., Evidence of magnetism-induced topolog- ical protection in the axion insulator candidate EuSn2P2, 11 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119,...

    2022

  61. [69]

    S. X. Riberolles, T. V. Trevisan, B. Kuthanazhi, T. Heit- mann, F. Ye, D. Johnston, S. Bud’ko, D. Ryan, P. Can- field, A. Kreyssig, et al., Magnetic crystalline-symmetry- protected axion electrodynamics and field-tunable un- pinned dirac cones in EuIn 2As2, Nature communicatio...

    2021

  62. [70]

    Hennion, F

    M. Hennion, F. Moussa, G. Biotteau, J. Rodriguez- Carvajal, L. Pinsard, and A. Revcolevschi, Evidence of anisotropic magnetic polarons in La 0.94Sr0.06MnO3 by neutron scattering and comparison with Ca-doped man- ganites, Physical Review B 61, 9513 (2000)

    2000

  63. [71]

    L. J. de Jongh, Magnetic properties of layered transition metal compounds , Vol. 9 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012)

    2012

  64. [72]

    P. M. Richards and M. Salamon, Exchange narrowing of electron spin resonance in a two-dimensional system, Physical Review B 9, 32 (1974)

    1974

  65. [73]

    Xin, X.-K

    W. Xin, X.-K. Li, X.-L. He, B.-W. Su, X.-Q. Jiang, K.- X. Huang, X.-F. Zhou, Z.-B. Liu, and J.-G. Tian, Black- phosphorus-based orientation-induced diodes, Advanced Materials 30, 1704653 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.