Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Dissecting environmental effects with eccentric gravitational wave sources

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that, for eccentric gas-embedded binaries, the gravitational-wave dephasing is dominated by the n=1 epicyclical resonance of the environmental force rather than by orbit-averaged drag once the eccentricity is above about…

desk verdict A solid analytic framework for resonant dephasing in eccentric binaries, with the n=1 dominance claim still conditional on the laminar, low-e numerics. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.09140 v3 pith:V7KNGKMY submitted 2025-06-10 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAgr-qc

Lorenz Zwick , Kai Hendriks , David O'Neill , János Takátsy , Philip Kirkeberg , Christopher Tiede , Jakob Stegmann , Johan Samsing
show 1 more author
Daniel J. D'Orazio
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.COastro-ph.GAgr-qc
keywords gravitationalwavesenvironmentaleffectsdephasingeccentricbinariesepicyclicalresonancesgas-embeddeddynamicalfrictioncircumbinaryaccretiondisks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Environmental effects on gravitational-wave sources are usually modelled by an orbit-averaged force that produces a simple power-law dephasing of the signal. This paper argues that the treatment is incomplete for eccentric binaries: oscillating force components that vanish under an orbit average can resonate with the epicyclical motion of the binary and cause secular drifts in semi-major axis and eccentricity, and therefore in the gravitational-wave phase. Deriving the dephasing produced by each Fourier mode of the force, the paper finds that for gas-embedded binaries with eccentricity above roughly $0.05$ in the detector band, the $n=1$ resonance dominates the dephasing from smoothed or orbit-averaged gas drag. If this is right, realistic gas environments leave larger and differently scaling dephasing imprints than currently assumed, and eccentric sources become tools for measuring the time-varying structure of their environment.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Fourier decomposition of the perturbative acceleration into radial and azimuthal components at integer multiples of the instantaneous Keplerian frequency, with slowly varying complex coefficients (Eq. 3). Inserting this decomposition into the Lagrange planetary equations and expanding the true anomaly in eccentricity (the equation of the center) separates oscillatory perturbations from secular drifts: the orbit average selects resonant modes $n=1,2,3$ that would vanish for a circular orbit, producing Eqs. (15) and (16) for $\dot a$ and $\dot e$. These secular drifts are converted into gravitational-wave dephasing through the chirp integral of Eq. (31), with the accumulated eccentricity difference computed from the standard vacuum eccentric-inspiral relation, giving the per-mode dephasing formula of Eq. (37). The mechanism carrying the argument is that the orbit average of the product of force and velocity does not equal the product of their averages, $\langle T v_T\rangle \neq \langle T\rangle\langle v_T\rangle$, so fluctuating forces leave a net secular imprint that smoothed models miss.

What would settle it

Run a self-consistent hydrodynamical simulation of an equal-mass binary embedded in a thin circumbinary disk with initial eccentricity near 0.1, letting the orbit evolve under both gas and gravitational-wave forces, and measure the dephasing relative to vacuum: if it follows the orbit-averaged drag power law of the $n=0$ component instead of growing with the $n=1$ resonance scaling $e_0\,f^{-19/18}$, the paper's dominance claim is falsified. A cheaper check is to track the phase of the $n=1$ force Fourier coefficient over many orbits in the paper's own fixed-orbit data; if that phase wanders on super-orbital timescales, the coherent resonance assumption breaks down.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, in the gravitational-wave-driven inspiral of mildly eccentric binaries, the secular drift of the orbital elements—and hence the gravitational-wave dephasing—is set by resonant Fourier modes of the perturbing force that are invisible to an orbit average. At first order in perturbation theory, expanding the true anomaly in powers of eccentricity shows that force modes $n=1,2,3$ enter the secular equations for $\dot a$ and $\dot e$ (Eqs. 15 and 16) with coefficients proportional to powers of $e$, and these convert into dephasing components $\delta\phi_n$ with eccentricity and frequency scalings distinct from the $n=0$ baseline (Eq. 37). Applying the framework to gas-embedded binaries through analytic drag models, linear-response dynamical friction, mildly nonlinear hydrodynamics, and a fully nonlinear circumbinary-disk simulation, the paper finds that the $n=1$ epicyclical resonance dominates the dephasing for eccentricities in the range roughly $0.05$ to $0.4$, often by an order of magnitude or more relative to the orbit-averaged expectation.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes that the environmental force can be represented as a set of oscillations locked to integer multiples of the instantaneous orbital frequency with slowly drifting coefficients; if real gas forces are dominated by aperiodic turbulence or stochastic accretion that is not phase-locked to the orbit, the coherent resonance that drives the predicted dominance can be suppressed or replaced by a different stochastic dephasing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Standard power-law dephasing templates for gas-embedded eccentric sources are incomplete; they must be supplemented with eccentricity-dependent terms, each resonance order adding an extra $f^{-19/18}$ scaling.
  • Above $e\approx0.05$, the total gas-induced dephasing of an equal-mass binary is dominated by the $n=1$ resonance, so its amplitude is set by force variability rather than by the orbit-averaged drag magnitude.
  • The phases of the force Fourier components can reverse the sign of the dephasing or change which mode dominates in different frequency intervals, so a single power-law fit can miss or misattribute the environmental signal.
  • Dissecting dephasing into its Fourier components turns eccentric gravitational-wave sources into probes of the environment's time-variable coupling, allowing features such as torque peaks at multiples of the orbital frequency to be measured.
  • A binary with reference eccentricity around $0.1$ in the same gas environment shows gas-induced dephasing roughly an order of magnitude larger than the circular-orbit expectation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • We infer that the same Fourier dissection applies to any periodic environmental perturbation, not just gas drag—for example tidal fields from a companion whose orientation varies on orbital timescales—so the dephasing components could serve as a generic environmental spectroscopy.
  • Because the numerical evidence uses binaries on fixed Keplerian orbits, an immediate testable extension is to run self-consistently evolving hydrodynamical simulations and check whether the back-reaction shifts the $e\approx0.05$ transition or the sign of the $n=1$ contribution.
  • We further infer that for extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, where force fluctuations are proportionally larger, resonant dephasing may set in at even lower eccentricities; the paper notes the equal-mass case is conservative but does not compute the extreme-mass-ratio dephasing explicitly.
  • A practical consequence we draw is that measured dephasing in eccentric binaries should be fitted with a sum of components whose frequency slopes are related by powers of $f^{-19/18}$; detecting such a ladder would be strong evidence for orbit-locked force variability rather than smooth drag.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a systematic perturbative framework for computing the secular evolution of semi-major axis and eccentricity, and the resulting gravitational-wave dephasing, for eccentric binaries subject to time-varying forces decomposed into Fourier modes at integer multiples of the orbital frequency (Eq. 3). The central result is that epicyclical resonances, especially the n=1 mode, produce secular drifts that survive orbit averaging and dominate over standard orbit-averaged environmental dephasing for gas-embedded binaries with mild eccentricity (e > 0.05). The authors support this with analytical expansions (Eqs. 15, 16, and 37), three analytical prescriptions for environmental forces (Table I), and three numerical approaches: linear gaseous dynamical friction, non-linear Athena++ simulations, and a fully non-linear Sailfish circumbinary-disc simulation. The paper concludes that eccentric gas-embedded binaries will show dephasing dominated by force variability rather than by smoothed drag, and that future GW analyses should account for this.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper identifies a genuinely new and potentially important effect: standard power-law environmental dephasing templates are incomplete for eccentric sources, and individual Fourier modes of the environmental force could be measured from GW signals. The analytic derivation is a strength: the secular equations are derived from Lagrange's planetary equations with an eccentricity expansion, and the coefficients in Appendix A are machine-checked with Mathematica. The paper also gives explicit, falsifiable scalings, e.g., that n-th resonant dephasing components are suppressed by additional powers of eccentricity and scale as f^{-19/18} relative to the n=0 component. However, the paper's own text repeatedly qualifies the numerical results as 'illustrative' or 'qualitative' (Sec. VI.B, Fig. 5 caption), and the dephasing curves underpinning the e > 0.05 dominance claim are computed with the low-e expansion Eq. 37. The significance is therefore high if the effect is confirmed for realistic gas flows, but the current evidence is conditional.

major comments (4)
  1. [§VI.B and Figs. 5–7] All dephasing curves supporting the e > 0.05 dominance claim are computed with Eq. 37, which is explicitly a low-eccentricity expansion truncated at O(e0^3), and the authors themselves mark e > 0.3 results as illustrative. Yet Fig. 7 shows dominance extending to e ~ 0.4 and the abstract states the result for e > 0.05 without this caveat. This is load-bearing: please quantify the convergence of Eq. 37 by comparing it with the O(e0^4) expressions in Appendix A, or with a direct numerical integration of the dephasing integral, and either extend the validated range or soften the claim accordingly.
  2. [§II.A and §VI.A] The entire framework rests on Eq. (3), which represents the perturbative force as a discrete Fourier series at integer multiples of the instantaneous Keplerian frequency with slowly varying coefficients. The paper itself notes in §VI.A that turbulence and stochastic accretion are real sources of variability, and Ref. [83] shows that stochastic torques can corrupt dephasing recovery. The numerical evidence in Sec. VI is laminar and isothermal, and extracting Fourier coefficients by averaging over 20–1000 orbits implicitly assumes phase coherence of the n=1 component over the dephasing accumulation time. If real gas forces contain a broad-band or phase-wandering component at fK, the coherent resonant dephasing is suppressed relative to the laminar estimate. This does not invalidate the analytic framework, but it does mean the abstract's unconditional 'dominate for e > 0.05' claim is not established by the present simulations. A concrete test would be to measure the n=1 phase coherence time in a turbulent or MRI-driven simulation, or to inject a stochastic component into the analytic model and show the dominance survives.
  3. [§VI.B.2–VI.B.3] The hydrodynamical simulations prescribe fixed Keplerian orbits and do not evolve the binary under the measured back-reaction force. The secular equations (15)–(16) assume the orbital elements change adiabatically, but the measured Fourier coefficients B_n(a,e) are obtained at fixed (a,e) and may not remain valid as the binary actually inspirals and its eccentricity changes. In particular, the phase of the n=1 mode, which controls whether energy is added to or extracted from the binary (as noted in §VI.C), could vary during self-consistent evolution. Please test this by evolving the orbital elements using the measured coefficients over the relevant dephasing timescale, or by performing a simulation with self-consistent orbital updating, to confirm that the resonance persists.
  4. [§IV.A and §VI.C] Eq. (37) is derived under the assumption of constant Fourier coefficients, as stated in §IV.A. The application in Section VI, however, uses coefficients extracted from simulations that depend strongly on eccentricity and frequency, and Fig. 5–7 present total dephasing curves obtained by combining Eq. (37) with these e-dependent coefficients. The manuscript notes that power-law forms modify the scalings but does not provide the corresponding derivation or a numerical check. Please specify exactly how Eq. (37) is adapted for e-dependent and f-dependent coefficients, and validate the resulting dephasing against a direct numerical integration of Eq. (31), especially in regions where the coefficients vary rapidly with e.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption states the force has '|BS_1| = 1, |BS_1| = 3 and |BS_2| = 15'; the second coefficient presumably should be BS_0 (or a different n). Please fix this typo, as it makes the described normalization ambiguous.
  2. [Eq. 37 and Eq. 41] The coefficient of BS_1 in Eq. (37) is reported as 3106BS_1, while the expanded component in Eq. (41) is written as 3104BS_1. Please check which value is correct, as both are claimed to be parts of the same expansion.
  3. [Eq. 43] The Gaussian envelope is written as exp((a - ares)^2 / sigma_a^2), which lacks the negative sign; it should be exp(- (a - ares)^2 / sigma_a^2) so that the envelope decays away from the resonance.
  4. [Data availability] The Data Availability statement says data and notebooks 'will be shared upon reasonable request'. For a paper whose numerical results are central to the main claim, depositing the analysis scripts and hydrodynamical output in a permanent archive would substantially improve reproducibility.
  5. [References] There are duplicated references: [26] and [37] are the same paper, and [44] and [45] are the same paper. Please merge these entries to avoid confusion.
  6. [§III.B] The text contains a typo, 'peturbative forces', which should read 'perturbative forces'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: resonance dephasing is derived from Lagrange equations and evaluated with independently measured force spectra.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained. Equations (15)-(16) are obtained by inserting the equation-of-center expansion (Eq. 12) into the Lagrange planetary equations (Eqs. 6-7) and performing the orbit average (Eqs. 13-14); no target result is used as an input. Equation (37) follows by substituting these secular drifts into the dephasing integral (Eq. 31), which is a standard first-order perturbation expression. The numerical sections do not fit any dephasing parameter to data: Fourier coefficients B_n are extracted from force time series of the simulations, and the dephasing is then evaluated through the derived formula. The dominance of the n=1 resonance is therefore a forward application of measured force spectra, not a fitted quantity relabeled as a prediction. Self-citations to PI (Zwick et al. 2024) and O'Neill et al. (2024) supply methodology and one of three force datasets, but the central claim is independently supported by the new Athena++ and Sailfish simulations and by the analytic derivation. The stated assumptions of the adiabatic two-timescale approximation and periodic force decomposition (Eq. 3) are explicit and not smuggled in through citation. The paper also openly flags limitations: Eq. 37 is used as a proxy with high-eccentricity results marked illustrative, and stochastic gas torques are acknowledged via Ref. [83]. These are validity caveats, not circular steps, so no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The core derivation is self-contained first-order perturbation theory with standard celestial mechanics. The main domain assumptions are the adiabatic periodic force decomposition and the fixed-orbit hydrodynamical proxies. No new physical entities are introduced; the listed free parameters are simulation settings and illustrative amplitudes, not parameters fitted to the dephasing prediction.

free parameters (5)
  • Illustrative Fourier amplitudes (Figs. 2-3) = Arbitrary units: |B_S0|=1, |B_S1|=3, |B_S2|=10 to 15; phases varied
    Hand-chosen to display dephasing phenomenology, not fitted to data; the authors state the values are representative.
  • Reference eccentricity and mass for demonstration = e10Hz=0.05, m1=m2=8 Msun
    Convenient source choice; plots can be rescaled to other masses and eccentricities, so it does not affect the qualitative claim.
  • Athena++ nonlinear dynamical friction setup = rs=0.05a, GM/(c_s^2 rs)=10 (B=0.5), Mach=8 at pericenter
    Hand-selected to keep nonlinearity mild and supersonic; the n=1 dominance in Fig. 6 depends on this setup.
  • CBD Sailfish disk setup = h/r=0.1, cs=h v_kep, nu=10^-3 a^2 Omega_b, 2000 orbits
    Matches the Santa Barbara code comparison (Duffell et al. 2024), extended to eccentric binaries; the e>0.05 transition is extracted from these runs.
  • Truncation order of dephasing formula = O(e^2) through Eq. 37
    Used for all dephasing curves; the authors flag high-e results as illustrative, so the truncation is a modeling choice that affects the high-e part of the central claim.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Lagrange planetary equations govern the secular response of a and e to perturbative forces.
    Eqs. 6-7, Section II.A.
  • domain assumption The perturbative force is periodic at integer multiples of the instantaneous Keplerian frequency and evolves adiabatically.
    Eq. 3, Section II.A; this is the backbone of the entire Fourier-resonance framework.
  • domain assumption Newtonian binary dynamics with first-order perturbation theory; relativistic and environmental cross terms decouple.
    Section II.A; authors argue PN-environment mixing enters at 5th-6th PN order.
  • standard math Vacuum GW-driven inspiral follows Peters-Mathews with F(e) and g(e).
    Eqs. 19-24, Section III.A.
  • standard math Dephasing can be expanded to first order in small perturbations, with the accumulated eccentricity difference defined by Eq. 32.
    Section III.B; follows Takatsy et al. 2025, Ref. [110].
  • domain assumption Force Fourier coefficients measured on fixed Keplerian orbits are representative of those during the actual inspiral.
    Section VI.B; authors explicitly call the comparison qualitative.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dissecting environmental effects with eccentric gravitational wave sources." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V7KNGKMY

@misc{pith2026250609140,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dissecting environmental effects with eccentric gravitational wave sources},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V7KNGKMY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.09140}
}
abstract

We model the effect of resonances between time-varying perturbative forces and the epi-cyclical motion of eccentric binaries in the gravitational wave (GW) driven regime. These induce secular drifts in the orbital elements which are reflected in a dephasing of the binary's GW signal, derived here systematically. The resulting dephasing prescriptions showcase a much richer phenomenology with respect to typically adopted power-laws, and are better able to model realistic environmental effects (EE). The most important consequences are for gas embedded binaries, which we analyse in detail with a series of analytical calculations, numerical experiments and a curated set of hydrodynamical simulations for equal masses. Even in these simplified tests, we find the surprising result that dephasing caused by epi-cyclical resonances dominate over expectations based on smoothed or orbit averaged gas drag models in GW signals that retain mild eccentricity in the detector band ($e> 0.05$). We discuss how dissecting GW dephasing in its component Fourier modes can be used to probe the coupling of binaries with their surrounding environment in unprecedented detail.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.09140 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Illustration of the principal ingredients used to derive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Various possible dephasing curves in the GW of a perturbed, chirping eccentric binary, as a function of eccentricity. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Dephasing in the GW of a perturbed, chirping eccentric binary system, as function of the eccentricity. In the left panel, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Gas density snapshots showcasing the three approaches detailed in section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Left panel: Fourier coefficients (here only for azimuthal forces) for gaseous dynamical friction in the linear response [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Left panel: Fourier coefficients for the forces experienced by an equal mass binary at a given reference frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison of the magnitude of the dephasing for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Observable signature of magnetic tidal coupling in hierarchical triple systems

    gr-qc 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Magnetic tidal fields from a supermassive black hole trigger new orbital resonances in a companion compact binary, boosting eccentricity and altering its gravitational-wave signal.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

180 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [83]

    Tagawa, Z

    H. Tagawa, Z. Haiman, and B. Kocsis, Formation and Evolution of Compact-object Binaries in AGN Disks, Astrophys. J. 898, 25 (2020), arXiv:1912.08218 [astro- ph.GA]

    arXiv 2020

  2. [1]

    Gas dynamical friction in the linear regime We first consider the case of a low-mass binary in mo- tion through a homogeneous gas medium, i.e, gaseous dynamical friction [134] for a binary system. Here we closely follow the results presented in [173], which anal- yse both the gas density perturbations and back-reaction forces onto the binary components, f...

  3. [2]

    The binary follows a fixed ec- centric orbit with a Mach number of 8, here denoting the ratio of the pericenter velocity and the gas speed of sound

    Gas dynamical friction in the non-linear regime To illustrate the increase in complexity introduced by the non-linear response to the embedded binary, we per- form a suite of 3D inviscid hydrodynamical simulations with Athena++ [174]. The binary follows a fixed ec- centric orbit with a Mach number of 8, here denoting the ratio of the pericenter velocity a...

  4. [3]

    Fully non-linear CBD simulation Lastly, we consider the time-varying forces on an equal- mass binary on a fixed Keplerian orbit surrounded by a thin, Keplerian accretion disk. We numerically solve the isothermal Navier-Stokes equations in two dimen- sions with Sailfish [177] for nine binary eccentricities ranging from e ∈ [0, 0.8] at a global grid resolut...

    2000

  5. [4]

    Y. Levin, Starbursts near supermassive black holes: young stars in the Galactic Centre, and gravita- tional waves in LISA band, MNRAS 374, 515 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0603583 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2007

  6. [5]

    Kocsis, N

    B. Kocsis, N. Yunes, and A. Loeb, Observable signatures of extreme mass-ratio inspiral black hole binaries em- bedded in thin accretion disks, Phys. Rev. D 84, 024032 (2011), arXiv:1104.2322 [astro-ph.GA]

    arXiv 2011

  7. [6]

    These components are shown to introduce com- plex dephasing behavior that deviates significantly 15 from the typical orbit averaged power-law approx- imations used in GW modeling

    We derived the GW phase shift components result- ing from Fourier modes of the perturbative forces. These components are shown to introduce com- plex dephasing behavior that deviates significantly 15 from the typical orbit averaged power-law approx- imations used in GW modeling. Our prescrip- tions therefore capture a broader and more nuanced range of phy...

  8. [7]

    These showcase frequency scal- ings that are distinct from what is usually associ- ated to the respective EE

    We demonstrated that even the simplest models of EE give rise to additional dephasing components due to resonances. These showcase frequency scal- ings that are distinct from what is usually associ- ated to the respective EE. In the basic case where all Fourier coefficients are constant, we expect the n-th dephasing component δϕn to be steeper by a factor...

Show all 180 references
  1. [8]

    We provided strong evidence for the fact that the first epicyclical resonance will most often dominate the dephasing in gas embedded binaries with ec- centricities larger than ∼ 0.05, even in the equal mass case. Equal mass gas embedded binaries with a reference eccentricity o...

  2. [9]

    S. K. Chakrabarti, Binary Black Holes in Station- ary Orbits and a Test of the Active Galactic Nucleus Paradigm, Astrophys. J. 411, 610 (1993)

    1993

  3. [10]

    This results in a value of B = 0 .5 for our chosen softening of rs = 0.05a. This value ensures that the non- linear response of the gas will be dominated by the effect of the increased gravitational influence of each compo- nent, rather than the curvature of the orbit. However...

  4. [11]

    F. D. Ryan, Gravitational waves from the inspiral of a compact object into a massive, axisymmetric body with arbitrary multipole moments, Phys. Rev. D 52, 5707 (1995)

    1995

  5. [12]

    Barausse and L

    E. Barausse and L. Rezzolla, Influence of the hydro- dynamic drag from an accretion torus on extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 77, 104027 (2008), arXiv:0711.4558 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  6. [13]

    D. J. D’Orazio and A. Loeb, Repeated gravita- tional lensing of gravitational waves in hierarchical black hole triples, Phys. Rev. D 101, 083031 (2020), arXiv:1910.02966 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Barausse, V

    E. Barausse, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, Can en- vironmental effects spoil precision gravitational-wave astrophysics?, Phys. Rev. D 89, 104059 (2014), arXiv:1404.7149 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  8. [15]

    It is also worth noting that most numerical stud- ies on this topic—have primarily focused on discs with 12 FIG. 6. Left panel: Fourier coefficients for the forces experienced by an equal mass binary at a given reference frequency subject to gas dynamical friction in the non-l...

  9. [16]

    Inayoshi, R

    K. Inayoshi, R. Hirai, T. Kinugawa, and K. Hotokezaka, Formation pathway of Population III coalescing binary black holes through stable mass transfer, MNRAS 468, 5020 (2017), arXiv:1701.04823 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Meiron, B

    Y. Meiron, B. Kocsis, and A. Loeb, Detecting Triple Systems with Gravitational Wave Observations, As- trophys. J. 834, 200 (2017), arXiv:1604.02148 [astro- ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Bonetti, E

    M. Bonetti, E. Barausse, G. Faye, F. Haardt, and A. Sesana, About gravitational-wave generation by a three-body system, Classical and Quantum Gravity 34, 215004 (2017), arXiv:1707.04902 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Torres-Orjuela, X

    A. Torres-Orjuela, X. Chen, Z. Cao, P. Amaro-Seoane, and P. Peng, Detecting the beaming effect of grav- itational waves, Phys. Rev. D 100, 063012 (2019), arXiv:1806.09857 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Randall and Z.-Z

    L. Randall and Z.-Z. Xianyu, Observing Eccentric- ity Oscillations of Binary Black Holes in LISA, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1902.08604 (2019), arXiv:1902.08604 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Cardoso and A

    V. Cardoso and A. Maselli, Constraints on the astrophysical environment of binaries with gravitational-wave observations, A&A 644, A147 (2020), arXiv:1909.05870 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  15. [22]

    B. Liu, D. J. D’Orazio, A. Vigna-G´ omez, and J. Sams- ing, Uncovering a hidden black hole binary from secular eccentricity variations of a tertiary star, Phys. Rev. D 106, 123010 (2022), arXiv:2207.10091 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [24]

    M. Garg, A. Derdzinski, L. Zwick, P. R. Capelo, and L. Mayer, The imprint of gas on gravitational waves from LISA intermediate-mass black hole binaries, MN- RAS 517, 1339 (2022), arXiv:2206.05292 [astro-ph.GA]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [25]

    P. S. Cole, A. Coogan, B. J. Kavanagh, and G. Bertone, Measuring dark matter spikes around pri- mordial black holes with Einstein Telescope and Cos- mic Explorer, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2207.07576 (2022), arXiv:2207.07576 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    R. S. Chandramouli and N. Yunes, Ready-to-use ana- lytic model for gravitational waves from a hierarchical triple with Kozai-Lidov oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 105, 064009 (2022), arXiv:2107.00741 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Sberna, S

    L. Sberna, S. Babak, S. Marsat, A. Caputo, G. Cusin, A. Toubiana, E. Barausse, C. Caprini, T. Dal Canton, A. Sesana, and N. Tamanini, Observing GW190521-like binary black holes and their environment with LISA, Phys. Rev. D 106, 064056 (2022), arXiv:2205.08550 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Zwick, P

    L. Zwick, P. R. Capelo, and L. Mayer, Priorities in gravitational waveforms for future space-borne detec- tors: vacuum accuracy or environment?, MNRAS 521, 4645 (2023), arXiv:2209.04060 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Tiede, D

    C. Tiede, D. J. D’Orazio, L. Zwick, and P. C. Duffell, Disk-induced Binary Precession: Implications for Dynamics and Multimessenger Observations of Black Hole Binaries, Astrophys. J. 964, 46 (2024), arXiv:2312.01805 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Dyson, J

    C. Dyson, J. Redondo-Yuste, M. van de Meent, and V. Cardoso, Relativistic aerodynamics of spin- ning black holes, Phys. Rev. D 109, 104038 (2024), arXiv:2402.07981 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Destounis, A

    K. Destounis, A. Kulathingal, K. D. Kokkotas, and G. O. Papadopoulos, Gravitational-wave imprints of compact and galactic-scale environments in extreme- mass-ratio binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2210.09357 (2022), arXiv:2210.09357 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Cardoso, K

    V. Cardoso, K. Destounis, F. Duque, R. P. Macedo, and A. Maselli, Gravitational Waves from Extreme-Mass- Ratio Systems in Astrophysical Environments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 241103 (2022), arXiv:2210.01133 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Caputo, L

    A. Caputo, L. Sberna, A. Toubiana, S. Babak, E. Ba- rausse, S. Marsat, and P. Pani, Gravitational-wave De- tection and Parameter Estimation for Accreting Black- hole Binaries and Their Electromagnetic Counterpart, Astrophys. J. 892, 90 (2020), arXiv:2001.03620 [astro- ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Derdzinski, D

    A. Derdzinski, D. D’Orazio, P. Duffell, Z. Haiman, and A. MacFadyen, Evolution of gas disc-embedded inter- 17 mediate mass ratio inspirals in the LISA band, MNRAS 501, 3540 (2021), arXiv:2005.11333 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [36]

    P. Basu, S. Chatterjee, and S. Mondal, Eccentric or- bits in disc-embedded EMRIs : orbital evolution and observability trend in LISA, MNRAS 531, 1506 (2024)

    2024

  28. [37]

    Caneva Santoro, S

    G. Caneva Santoro, S. Roy, R. Vicente, M. Haney, O. J. Piccinni, W. Del Pozzo, and M. Martinez, First Constraints on Compact Binary Environments from LIGO-Virgo Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 251401 (2024), arXiv:2309.05061 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Samsing, K

    J. Samsing, K. Hendriks, L. Zwick, D. J. D’Orazio, and B. Liu, Gravitational Wave Phase Shifts in Eccentric Black Hole Mergers as a Probe of Dynamical Formation Environments, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2403.05625 (2024), arXiv:2403.05625 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Hendriks, D

    K. Hendriks, D. Atallah, M. Martinez, M. Zevin, L. Zwick, A. A. Trani, P. Saini, J. Tak´ atsy, and J. Sams- ing, Large Gravitational Wave Phase Shifts from Strong 3-body Interactions in Dense Stellar Clusters, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.08572 (2024), arXiv:2411.08572 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Hendriks, L

    K. Hendriks, L. Zwick, and J. Samsing, Eccentric features in the gravitational wave phase of dynam- ically formed black hole binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.04603 (2024), arXiv:2408.04603 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Robson, N

    T. Robson, N. J. Cornish, N. Tamanini, and S. Toonen, Detecting hierarchical stellar systems with LISA, Phys. Rev. D 98, 064012 (2018), arXiv:1806.00500 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [42]

    B. Liu, D. J. Mu˜ noz, and D. Lai, Suppression of ex- treme orbital evolution in triple systems with short- range forces, MNRAS 447, 747 (2015), arXiv:1409.6717 [astro-ph.EP]

    2015 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Toubiana, L

    A. Toubiana, L. Sberna, A. Caputo, G. Cusin, S. Marsat, K. Jani, S. Babak, E. Barausse, C. Caprini, P. Pani, A. Sesana, and N. Tamanini, Detectable Envi- ronmental Effects in GW190521-like Black-Hole Bina- ries with LISA, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 101105 (2021), arXiv:2010.06056 [...

    2021 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Martin Barandiaran, S

    M. Martin Barandiaran, S. Kuroyanagi, and S. Nesseris, Gravitational waves in the circular restricted three body problem, Classical and Quantum Gravity 41, 095002 (2024), arXiv:2309.15510 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Zwick, C

    L. Zwick, C. Tiede, A. A. Trani, A. Derdzinski, Z. Haiman, D. J. D’Orazio, and J. Samsing, Novel cat- egory of environmental effects on gravitational waves from binaries perturbed by periodic forces, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103005 (2024), arXiv:2405.05698 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Belczynski, V

    K. Belczynski, V. Kalogera, and T. Bulik, A Compre- hensive Study of Binary Compact Objects as Gravi- tational Wave Sources: Evolutionary Channels, Rates, and Physical Properties, Astrophys. J. 572, 407 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0111452 [astro-ph]

    2002 arXiv

  38. [47]

    R. M. O’Leary, R. O’Shaughnessy, and F. A. Ra- sio, Dynamical interactions and the black-hole merger rate of the Universe, Phys. Rev. D 76, 061504 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0701887 [astro-ph]

    2007 arXiv

  39. [48]

    Sadowski, K

    A. Sadowski, K. Belczynski, T. Bulik, N. Ivanova, F. A. Rasio, and R. O’Shaughnessy, The Total Merger Rate of Compact Object Binaries in the Local Universe, Astro- phys. J. 676, 1162 (2008), arXiv:0710.0878 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Antonini and F

    F. Antonini and F. A. Rasio, Merging Black Hole Bi- naries in Galactic Nuclei: Implications for Advanced- LIGO Detections, Astrophys. J. 831, 187 (2016), arXiv:1606.04889 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Vitale, R

    S. Vitale, R. Lynch, R. Sturani, and P. Graff, Use of gravitational waves to probe the formation channels of compact binaries, Classical and Quantum Gravity 34, 03LT01 (2017), arXiv:1503.04307 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  42. [51]

    B. J. Kavanagh, D. A. Nichols, G. Bertone, and D. Gag- gero, Detecting dark matter around black holes with gravitational waves: Effects of dark-matter dynamics on the gravitational waveform, Phys. Rev. D 102, 083006 (2020), arXiv:2002.12811 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  43. [53]

    Zevin, S

    M. Zevin, S. S. Bavera, C. P. L. Berry, V. Kalogera, T. Fragos, P. Marchant, C. L. Rodriguez, F. Antonini, D. E. Holz, and C. Pankow, One Channel to Rule Them All? Constraining the Origins of Binary Black Holes Using Multiple Formation Pathways, Astrophys. J.910, 152 (2021), a...

    2021 arXiv

  44. [54]

    Kimball, C

    C. Kimball, C. Talbot, C. P. L. Berry, M. Zevin, E. Thrane, V. Kalogera, R. Buscicchio, M. Carney, T. Dent, H. Middleton, E. Payne, J. Veitch, and D. Williams, Evidence for Hierarchical Black Hole Merg- ers in the Second LIGO-Virgo Gravitational Wave Cat- alog, ApJ 915, L35 (2...

    2021 arXiv

  45. [55]

    Santini, D

    A. Santini, D. Gerosa, R. Cotesta, and E. Berti, Black- hole mergers in disklike environments could explain the observed q -χef fcorrelation, Phys. Rev. D 108, 083033 (2023), arXiv:2308.12998 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [56]

    S. F. Portegies Zwart and S. L. W. McMillan, Black Hole Mergers in the Universe, Astrophys. J. 528, L17 (2000)

    2000

  47. [57]

    W. H. Lee, E. Ramirez-Ruiz, and G. van de Ven, SHORT GAMMA-RAY BURSTS FROM DY- NAMICALLY ASSEMBLED COMPACT BINARIES IN GLOBULAR CLUSTERS: PATHW AYS, RATES, HYDRODYNAMICS, AND COSMOLOGICAL SET- TING, Astrophys. J. 720, 953 (2010)

    2010

  48. [58]

    Banerjee, H

    S. Banerjee, H. Baumgardt, and P. Kroupa, Stellar- mass black holes in star clusters: implications for grav- itational wave radiation, MNRAS 402, 371 (2010), arXiv:0910.3954 [astro-ph.SR]

    2010 arXiv

  49. [59]

    A. Tanikawa, Dynamical evolution of stellar mass black holes in dense stellar clusters: estimate for merger rate of binary black holes originating from globular clusters, MNRAS 435, 1358 (2013), arXiv:1307.6268

    2013 arXiv

  50. [60]

    Y.-B. Bae, C. Kim, and H. M. Lee, Compact bina- ries ejected from globular clusters as gravitational wave sources, MNRAS 440, 2714 (2014), arXiv:1308.1641 [astro-ph.HE]

    2014 arXiv

  51. [61]

    C. L. Rodriguez, M. Morscher, B. Pattabiraman, S. Chatterjee, C.-J. Haster, and F. A. Rasio, Binary Black Hole Mergers from Globular Clusters: Implica- tions for Advanced LIGO, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 051101 (2015), arXiv:1505.00792 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  52. [62]

    Ramirez-Ruiz, M

    E. Ramirez-Ruiz, M. Trenti, M. MacLeod, L. F. Roberts, W. H. Lee, and M. I. Saladino-Rosas, Com- pact Stellar Binary Assembly in the First Nuclear Star Clusters and r-process Synthesis in the Early Universe, ApJ 802, L22 (2015), arXiv:1410.3467. 18

    2015 arXiv

  53. [63]

    C. L. Rodriguez, S. Chatterjee, and F. A. Rasio, Bi- nary black hole mergers from globular clusters: Masses, merger rates, and the impact of stellar evolution, Phys. Rev. D 93, 084029 (2016), arXiv:1602.02444 [astro- ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  54. [64]

    C. L. Rodriguez, C.-J. Haster, S. Chatterjee, V. Kalogera, and F. A. Rasio, Dynamical Formation of the GW150914 Binary Black Hole, ApJ 824, L8 (2016), arXiv:1604.04254 [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [65]

    Askar, M

    A. Askar, M. Szkudlarek, D. Gondek-Rosi´ nska, M. Giersz, and T. Bulik, MOCCA-SUR VEY Database - I. Coalescing binary black holes originating from globu- lar clusters, MNRAS 464, L36 (2017), arXiv:1608.02520 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  56. [66]

    D. Park, C. Kim, H. M. Lee, Y.-B. Bae, and K. Belczyn- ski, Black hole binaries dynamically formed in globular clusters, MNRAS 469, 4665 (2017), arXiv:1703.01568 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  57. [67]

    Samsing, Eccentric black hole mergers forming in globular clusters, Phys

    J. Samsing, Eccentric black hole mergers forming in globular clusters, Phys. Rev. D 97, 103014 (2018), arXiv:1711.07452 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  58. [68]

    Samsing and D

    J. Samsing and D. J. D’Orazio, Black Hole Mergers From Globular Clusters Observable by LISA I: Ec- centric Sources Originating From Relativistic N-body Dynamics, MNRAS 10.1093/mnras/sty2334 (2018), arXiv:1804.06519 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  59. [69]

    Samsing, D

    J. Samsing, D. J. D’Orazio, K. Kremer, C. L. Rodriguez, and A. Askar, Single-single gravitational-wave captures in globular clusters: Eccentric deci-Hertz sources ob- servable by DECIGO and Tian-Qin, Phys. Rev. D 101, 123010 (2020), arXiv:1907.11231 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  60. [70]

    A. A. Trani, A. Tanikawa, M. S. Fujii, N. W. C. Leigh, and J. Kumamoto, Spin misalignment of black hole bi- naries from young star clusters: implications for the origin of gravitational waves events, MNRAS 504, 910 (2021), arXiv:2102.01689 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  61. [71]

    S. Naoz, B. Kocsis, A. Loeb, and N. Yunes, Resonant Post-Newtonian Eccentricity Excitation in Hierarchical Three-body Systems, Astrophys. J. 773, 187 (2013), arXiv:1206.4316 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  62. [72]

    G. Li, S. Naoz, B. Kocsis, and A. Loeb, Eccentricity Growth and Orbit Flip in Near-coplanar Hierarchical Three-body Systems, Astrophys. J. 785, 116 (2014), arXiv:1310.6044 [astro-ph.EP]

    2014 arXiv

  63. [74]

    J. M. O. Antognini and T. A. Thompson, Dynamical formation and scattering of hierarchical triples: cross- sections, Kozai-Lidov oscillations, and collisions, MN- RAS 456, 4219 (2016), arXiv:1507.03593 [astro-ph.SR]

    2016 arXiv

  64. [76]

    Randall and Z.-Z

    L. Randall and Z.-Z. Xianyu, An Analytical Portrait of Binary Mergers in Hierarchical Triple Systems, Astro- phys. J. 864, 134 (2018), arXiv:1802.05718 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  65. [77]

    A. S. Hamers and T. A. Thompson, Double Neutron Star Mergers from Hierarchical Triple-star Systems, As- trophys. J. 883, 23 (2019), arXiv:1907.08297 [astro- ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  66. [78]

    Liu and D

    B. Liu and D. Lai, Hierarchical black hole merg- ers in multiple systems: constrain the formation of GW190412-, GW190814-, and GW190521-like events, MNRAS 502, 2049 (2021), arXiv:2009.10068 [astro- ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [80]

    Bartos, B

    I. Bartos, B. Kocsis, Z. Haiman, and S. M´ arka, Rapid and Bright Stellar-mass Binary Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nuclei, Astrophys. J. 835, 165 (2017), arXiv:1602.03831 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  68. [81]

    N. C. Stone, B. D. Metzger, and Z. Haiman, Assisted inspirals of stellar mass black holes embedded in AGN discs: solving the ‘final au problem’, MNRAS 464, 946 (2017), arXiv:1602.04226

    2017 arXiv

  69. [82]

    McKernan, K

    B. McKernan, K. E. S. Ford, J. Bellovary, N. W. C. Leigh, Z. Haiman, B. Kocsis, W. Lyra, M.-M. MacLow, B. Metzger, M. O’Dowd, S. Endlich, and D. J. Rosen, On stellar-mass black hole mergers in AGN disks detectable with LIGO, ArXiv e-prints (2017), arXiv:1702.07818 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  70. [84]

    Samsing, I

    J. Samsing, I. Bartos, D. J. D’Orazio, Z. Haiman, B. Kocsis, N. W. C. Leigh, B. Liu, M. E. Pessah, and H. Tagawa, AGN as potential factories for eccentric black hole mergers, Nature (London) 603, 237 (2022), arXiv:2010.09765 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  71. [86]

    A. A. Trani, S. Quaini, and M. Colpi, Three-body encounters in black hole discs around a supermassive black hole. The disc velocity dispersion and the Kep- lerian tidal field determine the eccentricity and spin- orbit alignment of gravitational wave mergers, A&A 683, A135 (202...

    2024 arXiv

  72. [87]

    Fabj and J

    G. Fabj and J. Samsing, Eccentric mergers in agn discs: Influence of the supermassive black-hole on three-body interactions, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2402.16948 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  73. [88]

    Kejriwal, L

    S. Kejriwal, L. Speri, and A. J. K. Chua, Impact of Correlations on the Modeling and Inference of Beyond Vacuum-GR Effects in Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2312.13028 (2023), arXiv:2312.13028 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  74. [89]

    C. B. Owen, C.-J. Haster, S. Perkins, N. J. Cor- nish, and N. Yunes, Waveform accuracy and system- atic uncertainties in current gravitational wave ob- servations, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2301.11941 (2023), arXiv:2301.11941 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  75. [90]

    Zwick, J

    L. Zwick, J. Tak´ atsy, P. Saini, K. Hendriks, J. Sam- sing, C. Tiede, C. Rowan, and A. A. Trani, Envi- ronmental effects in stellar mass gravitational wave sources I: Expected fraction of signals with significant dephasing in the dynamical and AGN channels, arXiv 19 e-prints ...

    2025 arXiv

  76. [91]

    Copparoni, L

    L. Copparoni, L. Speri, L. Sberna, A. Derdzinski, and E. Barausse, The implications of stochastic gas torques for asymmetric binaries in the LISA band, arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2502.10087 (2025), arXiv:2502.10087 [gr- qc]

    2025 arXiv

  77. [92]

    Kley and R

    W. Kley and R. P. Nelson, Planet-Disk Interac- tion and Orbital Evolution, ARA&A 50, 211 (2012), arXiv:1203.1184 [astro-ph.EP]

    2012 arXiv

  78. [93]

    Roedig, A

    C. Roedig, A. Sesana, M. Dotti, J. Cuadra, P. Amaro- Seoane, and F. Haardt, Evolution of binary black holes in self gravitating discs. Dissecting the torques, A&A 545, A127 (2012), arXiv:1202.6063 [astro-ph.CO]

    2012 arXiv

  79. [94]

    Tiede, J

    C. Tiede, J. Zrake, A. MacFadyen, and Z. Haiman, Gas-driven Inspiral of Binaries in Thin Accretion Disks, Astrophys. J. 900, 43 (2020), arXiv:2005.09555 [astro- ph.GA]

    2020 arXiv

  80. [95]

    Zwick, A

    L. Zwick, A. Derdzinski, M. Garg, P. R. Capelo, and L. Mayer, Dirty waveforms: multiband harmonic con- tent of gas-embedded gravitational wave sources, MN- RAS 511, 6143 (2022), arXiv:2110.09097 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  81. [96]

    Romero-Shaw, P

    I. Romero-Shaw, P. D. Lasky, and E. Thrane, Signs of Eccentricity in Two Gravitational-wave Signals May Indicate a Subpopulation of Dynamically As- sembled Binary Black Holes, ApJ 921, L31 (2021), arXiv:2108.01284 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  82. [97]

    Gupte, A

    N. Gupte, A. Ramos-Buades, A. Buonanno, J. Gair, M. C. Miller, M. Dax, S. R. Green, M. P¨ urrer, J. Wild- berger, J. Macke, I. M. Romero-Shaw, and B. Sch¨ olkopf, Evidence for eccentricity in the population of binary black holes observed by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA, arXiv e- prints , ...

    2024 arXiv

  83. [98]

    Z. Xuan, S. Naoz, and X. Chen, Detecting accelerating eccentric binaries in the LISA band, Phys. Rev. D 107, 043009 (2023), arXiv:2210.03129 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  84. [99]

    Maggiore, C

    M. Maggiore, C. Van Den Broeck, N. Bartolo, E. Bel- gacem, D. Bertacca, M. A. Bizouard, M. Branch- esi, S. Clesse, S. Foffa, J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, S. Grimm, J. Harms, T. Hinderer, S. Matarrese, C. Palomba, M. Peloso, A. Ricciardone, and M. Sakellariadou, Sci- ence case for the...

    2020 arXiv

  85. [100]

    Evans, A

    M. Evans, A. Corsi, C. Afle, A. Ananyeva, K. G. Arun, S. Ballmer, A. Bandopadhyay, L. Barsotti, M. Baryakhtar, E. Berger, E. Berti, S. Biscov- eanu, S. Borhanian, F. Broekgaarden, D. A. Brown, C. Cahillane, L. Campbell, H.-Y. Chen, K. J. Daniel, A. Dhani, J. C. Driggers, A. Ef...

    2023 arXiv

  86. [101]

    Poisson and C

    E. Poisson and C. M. Will, Gravity (2014)

    2014

  87. [102]

    C. M. Will, Post-Newtonian effects in N-body dynam- ics: conserved quantities in hierarchical triple systems, Classical and Quantum Gravity 31, 244001 (2014), arXiv:1404.7724 [astro-ph.GA]

    2014 arXiv

  88. [103]

    C. M. Will and M. Maitra, Relativistic orbits around spinning supermassive black holes: Secular evolution to 4.5 post-Newtonian order, Phys. Rev. D 95, 064003 (2017), arXiv:1611.06931 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  89. [104]

    Liu and D

    B. Liu and D. Lai, Black Hole and Neutron Star Bi- nary Mergers in Triple Systems: Merger Fraction and Spin-Orbit Misalignment, Astrophys. J. 863, 68 (2018), arXiv:1805.03202 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  90. [105]

    H. S. Chia, S. Olsen, J. Roulet, L. Dai, T. Venumadhav, B. Zackay, and M. Zaldarriaga, Signs of higher multi- poles and orbital precession in GW151226, Phys. Rev. D 106, 024009 (2022), arXiv:2105.06486 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  91. [106]

    Karas and D

    V. Karas and D. Vokrouhlicky, Relativistic Precession of the Orbit of a Star near a Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. 422, 208 (1994)

    1994

  92. [107]

    Merritt, Dynamics and Evolution of Galactic Nuclei (2013)

    D. Merritt, Dynamics and Evolution of Galactic Nuclei (2013)

    2013

  93. [108]

    Speri and J

    L. Speri and J. R. Gair, Assessing the impact of tran- sient orbital resonances, Phys. Rev. D 103, 124032 (2021), arXiv:2103.06306 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  94. [109]

    Eleni, K

    A. Eleni, K. Destounis, T. A. Apostolatos, and K. D. Kokkotas, Resonant excitation of eccentricity in spher- ical extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D 110, 124004 (2024), arXiv:2408.02004 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  95. [110]

    Bonga, H

    B. Bonga, H. Yang, and S. A. Hughes, Tidal Resonance in Extreme Mass-Ratio Inspirals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 101103 (2019), arXiv:1905.00030 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  96. [111]

    Camilloni, T

    F. Camilloni, T. Harmark, G. Grignani, M. Orselli, and D. Pica, Binary mergers in strong gravity back- ground of Kerr black hole, MNRAS 531, 1884 (2024), arXiv:2310.06894 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  97. [112]

    Cocco, G

    M. Cocco, G. Grignani, T. Harmark, M. Orselli, and D. Pica, Strong-gravity precession resonances for binary systems orbiting a Schwarzschild black hole, arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2505.15901 (2025), arXiv:2505.15901 [gr- qc]

    2025

  98. [113]

    Blas and A

    D. Blas and A. C. Jenkins, Detecting stochastic gravita- tional waves with binary resonance, Phys. Rev. D 105, 064021 (2022), arXiv:2107.04063 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  99. [114]

    Cutler and ´E

    C. Cutler and ´E. E. Flanagan, Gravitational waves from merging compact binaries: How accurately can one extract the binary’s parameters from the inspiral waveform\?, Phys. Rev. D 49, 2658 (1994), arXiv:gr- qc/9402014 [gr-qc]

    1994

  100. [115]

    Maggiore, Gravitational Waves: Volume 2: Astro- physics and Cosmology(2018)

    M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves: Volume 2: Astro- physics and Cosmology(2018)

    2018

  101. [116]

    P. C. Peters, Gravitational Radiation and the Motion of Two Point Masses, Physical Review 136, 1224 (1964)

    1964

  102. [117]

    Yunes, K

    N. Yunes, K. G. Arun, E. Berti, and C. M. Will, Post- circular expansion of eccentric binary inspirals: Fourier- domain waveforms in the stationary phase approxima- tion, Phys. Rev. D 80, 084001 (2009), arXiv:0906.0313 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  103. [118]

    Tak´ atsy, L

    J. Tak´ atsy, L. Zwick, K. Hendriks, P. Saini, G. Fabj, and J. Samsing, The construction and use of dephasing 20 prescriptions for environmental effects in gravitational wave astronomy, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2505.09513 (2025), arXiv:2505.09513 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025

  104. [119]

    Deme, B.-M

    B. Deme, B.-M. Hoang, S. Naoz, and B. Kocsis, Detect- ing Kozai-Lidov Imprints on the Gravitational Waves of Intermediate-mass Black Holes in Galactic Nuclei, As- trophys. J. 901, 125 (2020), arXiv:2005.03677 [astro- ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  105. [120]

    P. S. Cole, G. Bertone, A. Coogan, D. Gaggero, T. Kary- das, B. J. Kavanagh, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. M. Tomaselli, Distinguishing environmental effects on bi- nary black hole gravitational waveforms, Nature Astron- omy 7, 943 (2023), arXiv:2211.01362 [gr-qc]

    2023

  106. [121]

    Tak´ atsy, B

    J. Tak´ atsy, B. Kocsis, and P. Kov´ acs, Observability of dynamical tides in merging eccentric neutron star bina- ries, Phys. Rev. D110, 103043 (2024), arXiv:2407.17560 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  107. [122]

    Antonini, S

    F. Antonini, S. Chatterjee, C. L. Rodriguez, M. Morscher, B. Pattabiraman, V. Kalogera, and F. A. Rasio, Black Hole Mergers and Blue Stragglers from Hierarchical Triples Formed in Globular Clus- ters, Astrophys. J. 816, 65 (2016), arXiv:1509.05080 [astro-ph.GA]

    2016 arXiv

  108. [123]

    Antonini, S

    F. Antonini, S. Toonen, and A. S. Hamers, Binary Black Hole Mergers from Field Triples: Properties, Rates, and the Impact of Stellar Evolution, Astrophys. J. 841, 77 (2017), arXiv:1703.06614 [astro-ph.GA]

    2017 arXiv

  109. [124]

    Silsbee and S

    K. Silsbee and S. Tremaine, Lidov-Kozai Cycles with Gravitational Radiation: Merging Black Holes in Iso- lated Triple Systems, Astrophys. J. 836, 39 (2017), arXiv:1608.07642 [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  110. [125]

    Toonen, H

    S. Toonen, H. B. Perets, and A. S. Hamers, Rate of WD-WD head-on collisions in isolated triples is too low to explain standard type Ia supernovae, A&A 610, A22 (2018), arXiv:1709.00422 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  111. [126]

    C. L. Rodriguez and F. Antonini, A Triple Origin for the Heavy and Low-spin Binary Black Holes De- tected by LIGO/VIRGO, Astrophys. J. 863, 7 (2018), arXiv:1805.08212 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  112. [127]

    Vigna-G´ omez, S

    A. Vigna-G´ omez, S. Toonen, E. Ramirez-Ruiz, N. W. C. Leigh, J. Riley, and C.-J. Haster, Massive Stellar Triples Leading to Sequential Binary Black Hole Mergers in the Field, ApJ 907, L19 (2021), arXiv:2010.13669 [astro- ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  113. [128]

    M. A. S. Martinez, G. Fragione, K. Kremer, S. Chatter- jee, C. L. Rodriguez, J. Samsing, C. S. Ye, N. C. Weath- erford, M. Zevin, S. Naoz, and F. A. Rasio, Black Hole Mergers from Hierarchical Triples in Dense Star Clus- ters, Astrophys. J. 903, 67 (2020), arXiv:2009.08468 [as...

    2020 arXiv

  114. [129]

    Arca Sedda, G

    M. Arca Sedda, G. Li, and B. Kocsis, Order in the chaos. Eccentric black hole binary mergers in triples formed via strong binary-binary scatterings, A&A 650, A189 (2021), arXiv:1805.06458 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  115. [130]

    A. A. Trani, S. Rastello, U. N. D. Carlo, F. Santoliq- uido, A. Tanikawa, and M. Mapelli, Compact object mergers in hierarchical triples from low-mass young star clusters, MNRAS 10.1093/mnras/stac122 (2022), arXiv:2111.06388 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  116. [131]

    Antoni, M

    A. Antoni, M. MacLeod, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz, The Evolution of Binaries in a Gaseous Medium: Three-dimensional Simulations of Binary Bondi-Hoyle- Lyttleton Accretion, Astrophys. J. 884, 22 (2019), arXiv:1901.07572 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  117. [132]

    Li and D

    R. Li and D. Lai, Hydrodynamical evolution of black- hole binaries embedded in AGN discs, MNRAS 517, 1602 (2022), arXiv:2202.07633 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  118. [133]

    A. M. Dempsey, H. Li, B. Mishra, and S. Li, Contract- ing and Expanding Binary Black Holes in 3D Low-mass AGN Disks: The Importance of Separation, Astrophys. J. 940, 155 (2022), arXiv:2203.06534 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  119. [134]

    Rowan, T

    C. Rowan, T. Boekholt, B. Kocsis, and Z. Haiman, Black Hole Binary Formation in AGN Discs: From Isolation to Merger, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2212.06133 (2022), arXiv:2212.06133 [astro-ph.GA]

    2022 arXiv

  120. [137]

    A. J. Dittmann, A. M. Dempsey, and H. Li, The Evolu- tion of Inclined Binary Black Holes in the Disks of Ac- tive Galactic Nuclei, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2310.03832 (2023), arXiv:2310.03832 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  121. [138]

    Rowan, H

    C. Rowan, H. Whitehead, and B. Kocsis, Black Hole Merger Rates in AGN: contribution from gas-captured binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2412.12086 (2024), arXiv:2412.12086 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024

  122. [139]

    Coogan, G

    A. Coogan, G. Bertone, D. Gaggero, B. J. Kavanagh, and D. A. Nichols, Measuring the dark matter environ- ments of black hole binaries with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 105, 043009 (2022), arXiv:2108.04154 [gr- qc]

    2022 arXiv

  123. [140]

    Dyson, T

    C. Dyson, T. F. M. Spieksma, R. Brito, M. van de Meent, and S. Dolan, Environmental effects in extreme mass ratio inspirals: perturbations to the environ- ment in Kerr, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2501.09806 (2025), arXiv:2501.09806 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  124. [141]

    Speeney, A

    N. Speeney, A. Antonelli, V. Baibhav, and E. Berti, Impact of relativistic corrections on the detectability of dark-matter spikes with gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 106, 044027 (2022), arXiv:2204.12508 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  125. [142]

    E. C. Ostriker, Dynamical Friction in a Gaseous Medium, Astrophys. J. 513, 252 (1999), arXiv:astro- ph/9810324 [astro-ph]

    1999

  126. [143]

    Bondi, On spherically symmetrical accretion, MN- RAS 112, 195 (1952)

    H. Bondi, On spherically symmetrical accretion, MN- RAS 112, 195 (1952)

    1952

  127. [144]

    G. Fabj, S. S. Nasim, F. Caban, K. E. S. Ford, B. McK- ernan, and J. M. Bellovary, Aligning nuclear cluster or- bits with an active galactic nucleus accretion disc, MN- RAS 499, 2608 (2020), arXiv:2006.11229 [astro-ph.GA]

    2020 arXiv

  128. [145]

    D¨ onmez, Relativistic simulation of flip-flop instabil- ities of Bondi-Hoyle accretion and quasi-periodic oscil- lations, MNRAS 426, 1533 (2012)

    O. D¨ onmez, Relativistic simulation of flip-flop instabil- ities of Bondi-Hoyle accretion and quasi-periodic oscil- lations, MNRAS 426, 1533 (2012)

    2012

  129. [146]

    R. S. Beckmann, A. Slyz, and J. Devriendt, Bondi or not Bondi: the impact of resolution on accretion and drag force modelling for supermassive black holes, MNRAS 478, 995 (2018), arXiv:1803.03014 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  130. [147]

    D. J. D’Orazio and P. C. Duffell, Orbital Evolution of Equal-mass Eccentric Binaries due to a Gas Disk: Ec- centric Inspirals and Circular Outspirals, ApJ 914, L21 (2021), arXiv:2103.09251 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  131. [148]

    Franchini, A

    A. Franchini, A. Lupi, and A. Sesana, Resolving Mas- sive Black Hole Binary Evolution via Adaptive Parti- cle Splitting, ApJ 929, L13 (2022), arXiv:2201.05619 21 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  132. [149]

    D. J. D’Orazio and M. Charisi, Observational Sig- natures of Supermassive Black Hole Binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2310.16896 (2023), arXiv:2310.16896 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  133. [150]

    D. J. D’Orazio, P. C. Duffell, and C. Tiede, Fast Methods for Computing Photometric Variability of Eccentric Binaries: Boosting, Lensing, and Variable Accretion, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2403.05629 (2024), arXiv:2403.05629 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  134. [151]

    Whitehead, C

    H. Whitehead, C. Rowan, T. Boekholt, and B. Kocsis, Gas assisted binary black hole formation in AGN discs, MNRAS 531, 4656 (2024), arXiv:2309.11561 [astro- ph.GA]

    2024 arXiv

  135. [152]

    L. J. Dai, S. V. Fuerst, and R. Blandford, Quasi-periodic flares from star-accretion-disc collisions, MNRAS 402, 1614 (2010), arXiv:0906.0800 [astro-ph.HE]

    2010 arXiv

  136. [153]

    Franchini, M

    A. Franchini, M. Bonetti, A. Lupi, G. Miniutti, E. Bor- tolas, M. Giustini, M. Dotti, A. Sesana, R. Arcodia, and T. Ryu, Quasi-periodic eruptions from impacts between the secondary and a rigidly precessing accretion disc in an extreme mass-ratio inspiral system, A&A 675, A100 ...

    2023 arXiv

  137. [154]

    Linial and B

    I. Linial and B. D. Metzger, EMRI + TDE = QPE: Peri- odic X-Ray Flares from Star-Disk Collisions in Galactic Nuclei, Astrophys. J. 957, 34 (2023), arXiv:2303.16231 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  138. [155]

    J. E. Barnes and L. Hernquist, Transformations of Galaxies. II. Gasdynamics in Merging Disk Galaxies, Astrophys. J. 471, 115 (1996)

    1996

  139. [156]

    Springel, T

    V. Springel, T. Di Matteo, and L. Hernquist, Modelling feedback from stars and black holes in galaxy merg- ers, MNRAS 361, 776 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0411108 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  140. [157]

    M. C. Begelman, R. D. Blandford, and M. J. Rees, Mas- sive black hole binaries in active galactic nuclei, Nature (London) 287, 307 (1980)

    1980

  141. [158]

    Milosavljevi´ c and D

    M. Milosavljevi´ c and D. Merritt, Long-Term Evolution of Massive Black Hole Binaries, Astrophys. J. 596, 860 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0212459 [astro-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  142. [159]

    Haiman, B

    Z. Haiman, B. Kocsis, K. Menou, Z. Lippai, and Z. Frei, Identifying decaying supermassive black hole binaries from their variable electromagnetic emission, Classical and Quantum Gravity 26, 094032 (2009), arXiv:0811.1920 [astro-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  143. [160]

    B. D. Farris, P. Duffell, A. I. MacFadyen, and Z. Haiman, Binary black hole accretion during inspiral and merger., MNRAS 447, L80 (2015), arXiv:1409.5124 [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  144. [161]

    A. J. Dittmann, G. Ryan, and M. C. Miller, The Decou- pling of Binaries from Their Circumbinary Disks, ApJ 949, L30 (2023), arXiv:2303.16204 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  145. [162]

    L. M. Krauth, J. Davelaar, Z. Haiman, J. R. Westernacher-Schneider, J. Zrake, and A. MacFadyen, Disappearing thermal X-ray emission as a tell-tale sig- nature of merging massive black hole binaries, MNRAS 526, 5441 (2023), arXiv:2304.02575 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  146. [163]

    M. J. Avara, J. H. Krolik, M. Campanelli, S. C. No- ble, D. Bowen, and T. Ryu, Accretion onto a Su- permassive Black Hole Binary Before Merger, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2305.18538 (2023), arXiv:2305.18538 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  147. [164]

    Cocchiararo, A

    F. Cocchiararo, A. Franchini, A. Lupi, and A. Sesana, Electromagnetic signatures from accreting massive black hole binaries in time domain photometric surveys, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2402.05175 (2024), arXiv:2402.05175 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  148. [165]

    O’Neill, C

    D. O’Neill, C. Tiede, D. J. D’Orazio, Z. Haiman, and A. MacFadyen, Gravitational Wave Decoupling in Retrograde Circumbinary Disks, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2501.11679 (2025), arXiv:2501.11679 [astro- ph.HE]

    2025 arXiv

  149. [166]

    M. Garg, A. Derdzinski, S. Tiwari, J. Gair, and L. Mayer, Measuring eccentricity and gas-induced per- turbation from gravitational waves of LISA massive black hole binaries, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2402.14058 (2024), arXiv:2402.14058 [astro-ph.GA]

    2024 arXiv

  150. [167]

    Lai and D

    D. Lai and D. J. Mu˜ noz, Circumbinary Accretion: From Binary Stars to Massive Binary Black Holes, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2211.00028 (2022), arXiv:2211.00028 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  151. [168]

    Franchini, M

    A. Franchini, M. Bonetti, A. Lupi, and A. Sesana, Emission signatures from sub-pc Post-Newtonian bi- naries embedded in circumbinary discs, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2401.10331 (2024), arXiv:2401.10331 [astro- ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  152. [169]

    Goldreich and S

    P. Goldreich and S. Tremaine, Disk-satellite interac- tions., Astrophys. J. 241, 425 (1980)

    1980

  153. [170]

    S. A. Balbus and J. F. Hawley, A Powerful Local Shear Instability in Weakly Magnetized Disks. I. Linear Anal- ysis, Astrophys. J. 376, 214 (1991)

    1991

  154. [171]

    Secunda, J

    A. Secunda, J. Bellovary, M.-M. Mac Low, K. E. S. Ford, B. McKernan, N. Leigh, and W. Lyra, Orbital Migration of Interacting Stellar Mass Black Holes in Disks around Supermassive Black Holes, ArXiv e-prints (2018), arXiv:1807.02859 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  155. [172]

    R. P. Nelson, On the orbital evolution of low mass proto- planets in turbulent, magnetised disks, A&A 443, 1067 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0508486 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  156. [173]

    Wu, Y.-X

    Y. Wu, Y.-X. Chen, and D. N. C. Lin, Chaotic Type I migration in turbulent discs, MNRAS 528, L127 (2024), arXiv:2311.15747 [astro-ph.EP]

    2024 arXiv

  157. [174]

    B. C. Kelly, M. Sobolewska, and A. Siemiginowska, A Stochastic Model for the Luminosity Fluctuations of Ac- creting Black Holes, Astrophys. J. 730, 52 (2011)

    2011

  158. [175]

    Frank, A

    J. Frank, A. King, and D. J. Raine, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition(2002)

    2002

  159. [176]

    Sirko and J

    E. Sirko and J. Goodman, Spectral energy distribu- tions of marginally self-gravitating quasi-stellar object discs, MNRAS 341, 501 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0209469 [astro-ph]

    2003 arXiv

  160. [177]

    T. A. Thompson, E. Quataert, and N. Murray, Ra- diation Pressure-supported Starburst Disks and Ac- tive Galactic Nucleus Fueling, Astrophys. J. 630, 167 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0503027 [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  161. [178]

    A. J. Dittmann and G. Ryan, A survey of disc thickness and viscosity in circumbinary accretion: Binary evo- lution, variability, and disc morphology, MNRAS 513, 6158 (2022), arXiv:2201.07816 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  162. [179]

    A. B. T. Penzlin, W. Kley, H. Audiffren, and C. M. Sch¨ afer, Binary orbital evolution driven by a circumbi- nary disc, A&A 660, A101 (2022), arXiv:2202.06681 [astro-ph.SR]

    2022 arXiv

  163. [180]

    A. M. Derdzinski, D. D’Orazio, P. Duffell, Z. Haiman, and A. MacFadyen, Probing gas disc physics with LISA: simulations of an intermediate mass ratio in- spiral in an accretion disc, MNRAS 486, 2754 (2019), arXiv:1810.03623 [astro-ph.HE]. 22

    2019 arXiv

  164. [181]

    O’Neill, D

    D. O’Neill, D. J. D’Orazio, J. Samsing, and M. E. Pes- sah, Gaseous Dynamical Friction on Elliptical Keplerian Orbits, Astrophys. J. 974, 216 (2024), arXiv:2401.16166 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  165. [182]

    J. M. Stone, K. Tomida, C. J. White, and K. G. Felker, The athena++ adaptive mesh refinement framework: Design and magnetohydrodynamic solvers, The Astro- physical Journal Supplement Series 249, 4 (2020)

    2020

  166. [183]

    Kim, Nonlinear Dynamical Friction of a Circular- orbit Perturber in a Gaseous Medium, Astrophys

    W.-T. Kim, Nonlinear Dynamical Friction of a Circular- orbit Perturber in a Gaseous Medium, Astrophys. J. 725, 1069 (2010), arXiv:1010.1995 [astro-ph.GA]

    2010 arXiv

  167. [184]

    Kim and W.-T

    H. Kim and W.-T. Kim, Nonlinear Dynamical Friction in a Gaseous Medium, Astrophys. J. 703, 1278 (2009), arXiv:0908.1391 [astro-ph.GA]

    2009 arXiv

  168. [185]

    Zrake and A

    J. Zrake and A. MacFadyen, Sailfish: Gpu-accelerated grid-based astrophysics gas dynamics code, Astro- physics Source Code Library, record ascl:2408.004 (2024)

    2024

  169. [186]

    P. C. Duffell, A. J. Dittmann, D. J. D’Orazio, A. Fran- chini, K. M. Kratter, A. B. T. Penzlin, E. Ragusa, M. Si- wek, C. Tiede, H. Wang, J. Zrake, A. M. Dempsey, Z. Haiman, A. Lupi, M. Pirog, and G. Ryan, The Santa Barbara Binary-Disk Code Comparison, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2...

    2024 arXiv

  170. [187]

    Zrake, C

    J. Zrake, C. Tiede, A. MacFadyen, and Z. Haiman, Equilibrium eccentricity of accreting binaries, The As- trophysical Journal Letters 909, L13 (2021)

    2021

  171. [188]

    Duque, S

    F. Duque, S. Kejriwal, L. Sberna, L. Speri, and J. Gair, Constraining accretion physics with gravitational waves from eccentric extreme-mass-ratio inspirals, arXiv e- prints , arXiv:2411.03436 (2024), arXiv:2411.03436 [gr- qc]

    2024 arXiv

  172. [189]

    Speri, A

    L. Speri, A. Antonelli, L. Sberna, S. Babak, E. Barausse, J. R. Gair, and M. L. Katz, Measuring accretion-disk effects with gravitational waves from extreme mass ra- tio inspirals, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2207.10086 (2022), arXiv:2207.10086 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.