Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

The ejection and detectability of high- and hyper-velocity stars by compact object binaries in globular clusters

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Three-body encounters between single stars and compact-object binaries in Milky Way globular clusters appear to have ejected roughly 6,300 stars over the last 500 million years, including about 839 moving faster than 500 km/s today.

desk verdict The paper's real contribution is the survey detectability forecasts; the headline fast-star count is order-of-magnitude at best and needs a few-body tail check. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.14273 v2 pith:CJNJJYBK submitted 2025-06-17 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Fraser A. Evans , Steffani M. Grondin , Claire S. Ye , Jeremy Webb , Alexander Laroche , Jo Bovy This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords hypervelocitystarsglobularclusterscompactobjectbinariesthree-bodyencountersstellarejectionsGaiaDR3LSSTMilkyWayhalo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether ordinary three-body encounters inside Milky Way globular clusters can produce hypervelocity stars, a role usually reserved for the supermassive black hole at the Galactic Centre. The authors combine evolved Monte Carlo models of cluster evolution with observed cluster parameters and a particle-spray prescription for three-body scattering, then propagate the ejected stars through a Milky Way potential and apply realistic survey selection functions. They find that over the last 500 million years, encounters between single stars and binaries containing a black hole, neutron star, or white dwarf have probably ejected about 6,300 stars from Galactic globular clusters, of which about 839 still move faster than 500 km/s today. Only about 290 of those stars should appear in Gaia DR3, and just one is predicted to be fast, whereas LSST should catch roughly 1,400 ejected stars, including about 13 fast ones. If the picture holds, globular clusters are a modest but real second source of hypervelocity stars, and fast extratidal stars become a remote-sensing tool for the contents of cluster cores.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the three-body encounter between a single star and a compact-object binary, processed by a particle-spray code built on an analytic three-body scattering framework that converts an encounter geometry into an ejection velocity. This is fed by a gravitationally focused interaction rate per cluster and per binary type, which depends on core density, velocity dispersion, and the binary population supplied by matching evolved Monte Carlo cluster models to observed globular cluster parameters. Ejected stars are then integrated backward and forward through a Galactic potential and passed through Gaia and LSST selection functions to decide which of them would actually be catalogued.

What would settle it

Re-run the three-body sampling with direct numerical few-body integrations: if the analytic prescription overproduces the above-500 km/s tail, the 839 fast-star estimate falls; observationally, a deep LSST search around NGC 7099 and NGC 7078 that finds no fast, faint ejecta would contradict the predicted rates.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that star + compact object binary (S+COB) interactions in Milky Way globular clusters are a viable, non-negligible source of high- and hyper-velocity stars. Over the last 500 Myr, the model predicts about 6,330 ejected stars, of which 839 have present-day Galactocentric speeds above 500 km/s; 73% of these fast stars come from encounters with black-hole-black-hole binaries, and roughly 22% are ejected by a single cluster, NGC 7078. Detectability is the limiting factor: only 290 ejected stars should be in Gaia DR3, with at most two radial velocities and one fast star, while LSST should see about 1,419, including 13 fast ones. The authors emphasize that the fastest stars are not clustered on the sky near their parent clusters, so they would arrive as kinematic outliers, and that future detections of fast extratidal stars would directly probe the present-day compact-object binary content of cluster cores.

Load-bearing premise

The whole counting argument assumes that the simulated cluster models matched to real globular clusters have the right number and kinds of compact-object binaries, and that the analytic fast three-body ejection tail matches what a full gravitational integration would produce.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the prediction is right, globular clusters are a second, albeit smaller, factory of hypervelocity stars: the most prolific cluster ejects one fast star roughly every 4.5 Myr, two orders of magnitude below the current upper limit from the Galactic Centre.
  • Gaia DR3 should contain about 290 S+COB-ejected stars but almost none of the fastest ones; full radial velocities exist for at most two of them, so identification will require more than Gaia astrometry.
  • LSST should detect roughly 1,400 ejected stars, about 13 of them faster than 500 km/s, with half of all detectable ejecta coming from NGC 7099.
  • Because fast ejecta are not angularly concentrated near their parent clusters, searches must rely on kinematics and chemistry rather than proximity to a cluster.
  • Detected fast extratidal stars would become a probe of cluster cores, encoding the presence and demographics of black-hole, neutron-star, and white-dwarf binaries.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension the paper leaves implicit: if age constraints are enforced in the cluster matching, the predicted yield for individual clusters shifts drastically (NGC 6541 rises about fifty-fold), so any cluster-by-cluster ranking should be treated as provisional until tailored simulations exist.
  • One could test the model by mining LSST coadds for faint, fast, metal-poor stars near the predicted top-ejecting clusters; a null detection would place upper limits on retained black-hole binary populations in those cores.
  • The same machinery could be pointed at M31's globular cluster system: if ejection rates scale with cluster density, Andromeda's larger cluster population might inject intergalactic hypervelocity stars into the Milky Way.
  • Since 73% of fast stars are attributed to black-hole binaries, this census doubles as an indirect measurement of how many black-hole binaries survive in present-day cluster cores.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper investigates whether three-body encounters between single stars and binaries containing compact objects (S+COB interactions) in Milky Way globular clusters can produce high- and hyper-velocity stars. The authors combine Cluster Monte Carlo (CMC) simulations matched to 149 Galactic globular clusters from the Baumgardt & Hilker catalogue, the particle-spray code Corespray based on the Valtonen & Karttunen three-body framework, and galpy orbit integrations, then apply empirical Gaia DR3 and LSST selection functions. Their headline claim is that over the last 500 Myr S+COB interactions ejected about 6300 stars from Galactic GCs, of which 839 have present-day Galactocentric velocities exceeding 500 km/s; they further predict 290 Gaia-detectable and 1419 LSST-detectable ejected stars, with NGC 7099 contributing roughly half of the detectable population. The paper also discusses COB recoil ejections and the possible role of intermediate-mass black holes.

Significance. If the central prediction holds, the result would establish globular clusters as a non-negligible source of hypervelocity stars, complementing the Hills mechanism, and would provide concrete, falsifiable predictions for LSST and future surveys. The work has notable strengths: the pipeline is carefully described and built on widely used public tools; the CMC matching is subjected to explicit robustness tests; the mock photometry and survey selection functions are treated in detail; and the authors openly discuss several limitations, including the age-matching fragility and the lack of published uncertainties in GC structural parameters. The main value of the paper is therefore not only the specific numerical predictions but also the demonstration that S+COB ejections are observationally tractable in the LSST era.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2.3.2 and Sec. 4, Fig. 10] The headline number of 839 fast stars rests on the high-velocity tail of the Corespray ejection-velocity distribution, and 73% of these fast stars come from S+BHBH interactions, yet the paper does not validate Corespray's tail for compact-object binaries against full few-body integrations. The comparison with Cabrera & Rodriguez (2023) in Sec. 6.3 highlights the stakes: that work finds only about 700 fast stars ejected over the entire Milky Way lifetime, whereas this paper finds 839 in just the last 500 Myr, implying an order-of-magnitude higher rate, and the discrepancy is not reconciled. I request a direct validation of Corespray against Fewbody or an equivalent integrator for representative BHBH and WDMS encounters, focusing on the rare, high-ejection-velocity events, together with a quantitative statement of how the 839 count changes under any resulting calibration.
  2. [Sec. 6.2] The age-matching test reveals a load-bearing instability in the cluster-by-cluster predictions: restricting five old clusters to CMC outputs older than 12 Gyr changes NGC 6541 from about 13 to about 978 fast stars, an amount that would more than double the global fast-star total of 839. Because the default matching allows outputs from 9 to 14 Gyr even for clusters that are generally agreed to be older than 12 Gyr, the central claim is sensitive to a plausible, internally motivated change in the matching scheme. The paper should either incorporate age constraints into the default matching, or present the global fast-star and detectable-star numbers marginalized over age-constrained matching, and explicitly state how the headline numbers change.
  3. [Sec. 3.1, Table 1, and Sec. 6.1] The quoted uncertainties (e.g., 839^{+70}_{-67}) are only the stochastic scatter over fifty matching iterations and do not include the dominant systematic uncertainties that enter Eq. (5) directly: the Baumgardt & Hilker structural parameters have no published errors, the multiplicity fraction is fixed at 5%, and a Kroupa IMF is assumed for all clusters. The paper's own example of NGC 6397 shows that the central density from the catalogue changed by an order of magnitude between catalogue versions, so the systematic error budget on the headline counts could be much larger than the quoted stochastic errors. I ask the authors to provide a quantitative propagation or bracketing of these systematics, even if only through simple scaling relations, so that the reader can judge the robustness of the 839, 290, and 1419 numbers.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 1] The text contains a typo: 'in princible' should be 'in principle'.
  2. [Sec. 6.1] The phrase 'we ce can speculate' contains a typo and should read 'we can speculate'.
  3. [Fig. 10 caption] The caption contains 'clustesr', which should be 'clusters'.
  4. [Sec. 2.3.2] The sentence 'use Eq. of Webb et al. (2013)' omits the equation number; please provide the specific equation used for the tidal radius.
  5. [Sec. 4] The definition of hypervelocity star as vGalactocentric > 500 km/s is loose, and the paper notes that 26% of the fast Gaia-detectable stars remain bound; a sentence restating the stricter 700 km/s unbound criterion and its implications would help avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the predicted ejection counts are derived from independent inputs rather than fitted to the target observables.

full rationale

The paper's central quantities—6300 total escapers, 839 fast stars, and the Gaia/LSST detectable counts—are obtained by propagating inputs that are external to the target prediction: GC structural parameters come from the independent Baumgardt & Hilker (2018) catalogue; compact-object binary populations come from pre-existing CMC model outputs; encounter outcomes are sampled with Corespray using the analytic three-body framework of Valtonen & Karttunen (2006); and survey detectability is determined from empirical GaiaUnlimited and LSST selection functions. No parameter in the pipeline is fitted to, or calibrated against, the number of observed hypervelocity stars or the number of ejections, so the headline counts are not forced by construction. The paper itself performs robustness tests (Sec. 6.2) showing sensitivity to the CMC matching choice, including a fifty-fold change for NGC 6541 when age-matching is imposed; this is an honest fragility assessment rather than evidence of circularity. The use of author-developed tools (Corespray, galpy, GaiaUnlimited) is a normal methodological choice; these tools are cited as implemented software, not as authority for the physical conclusion, and the physical input distributions are not defined in terms of the output counts. The lack of a direct few-body validation of Corespray's high-velocity ejection tail is a correctness risk, and the comparison with Cabrera & Rodriguez (2023) shows a rate tension, but neither the unvalidated tail nor the rate tension constitutes a circular reduction at the level of the paper's equations. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs, so no circular steps are identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No invented entities: the paper predicts a population of escaped stars using existing compact-object binary classes and standard simulation tools. The free parameters and axioms above are the main places where the central predictions could change if the inputs were different.

free parameters (3)
  • Multiplicity fraction f_mult = 0.05
    Assumed constant across all 149 GCs; it scales the single-star number density and hence the S+COB interaction rate in Eq. (5). The paper cites Milone et al. 2012 and Ji & Bregman 2015, but observed binary fractions vary with cluster, radius, and mass ratio (Sec. 6.1).
  • Mean single-star mass <m> = <m_S> = 0.35 M_sun
    Used to convert core density into number densities in Eqs. (4) and (5); based on a Kroupa IMF evolved with McLuster. A top-heavy mass function would change both the interaction rate and typical ejection velocities (Sec. 6.1).
  • Maximum flight time (lookback window) = 500 Myr
    Interactions are assumed uniformly distributed over the last 500 Myr; older ejections are ignored because they would be too distant and faint. This defines the quoted totals and is a modeling choice rather than a fitted parameter (Sec. 2.3.1).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Present-day GC structural parameters (r_c, rho_c, v_rms) from Baumgardt & Hilker 2018 are accurate and time-invariant over the last 500 Myr.
    These values enter Eq. (5) directly and select the CMC models. The catalogue does not publish uncertainties, and NGC 6397's central density changed by an order of magnitude between catalogue versions (Sec. 6.1).
  • domain assumption The CMC model grid, after matching, provides representative compact-object binary populations for real GCs.
    COB fractions f_i, masses, and semimajor axes in Eq. (5) come from the matched CMC output; Sec. 6.2 shows cluster-specific fast-star counts vary by factors of tens depending on which output is chosen.
  • domain assumption Corespray's analytic three-body sampling produces accurate ejection velocities, especially in the high-velocity tail.
    The fast-star count is dominated by rare, high-velocity ejections, mostly BHBH binaries (Sec. 4). The paper cites Grondin et al. 2023, 2024a for validation but shows no direct comparison with full few-body or N-body integrations for S+COB encounters.
  • domain assumption The S+COB interaction rate follows the gravitationally focused cross section with p equal to the mean semimajor axis of each COB population.
    Eqs. (2)-(5) neglect the geometric term and use <p> as the effective binary size; for very wide or very eccentric binaries this approximation may over- or under-estimate rates (Sec. 2.3.1).
  • domain assumption Empirical Gaia DR3 and LSST selection functions correctly describe detectability of the mock stars.
    The result that only 1 fast star is in Gaia depends on the GaiaUnlimited and Castro-Ginard selection functions and on assumed magnitudes; crowding and incompleteness near the bulge are not modeled (Sec. 2.5).
  • domain assumption Interaction times are uniformly distributed over the last 500 Myr and cluster properties are constant over that interval.
    Sec. 2.3.1 assumes present-day rates apply 500 Myr ago; a burst of core collapse or COB formation within that window would change the ejection history.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The ejection and detectability of high- and hyper-velocity stars by compact object binaries in globular clusters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CJNJJYBK

@misc{pith2026250614273,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The ejection and detectability of high- and hyper-velocity stars by compact object binaries in globular clusters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CJNJJYBK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.14273}
}
abstract

The dense cores of Milky Way globular clusters (GCs) play host to a variety of dynamical encounters between stellar objects, which can accelerate stars to velocities high enough to escape the GC. The most extreme examples of these encounters are interactions between single GC stars and binaries including at least one compact object. These interactions can result in ejection velocities of up to several hundred $\mathrm{km \ s^{-1}}$, approaching or even exceeding the escape velocity of the Galaxy itself. In order to study whether these interactions contribute to the Galactic population of hypervelocity stars (stars moving faster than the Galactic escape speed), we combine Monte Carlo $N$-body GC simulations, observations of Galactic GCs, and a particle spray code to generate realistic populations of stars which have escaped from Milky Way GCs following star + compact object binary (S+COB) interactions. We find that over the last 500 Myr, S+COB interactions have likely ejected $\sim$6300 stars from Galactic GCs, of which $839_{-67}^{+70}$ have present-day velocities exceeding $500 \; \mathrm{km \ s^{-1}}$. Using mock photometric observations, we find that $290_{-23}^{+28}$ ejected stars are detectable in Gaia Data Release 3, however, only $1_{-1}^{+2}$ stars faster than $500 \; \mathrm{km \ s^{-1}}$ are detectable. Even so, we show that observational prospects in the upcoming Legacy Survey of Space and Time are more optimistic, and future detected fast extratidal GC stars will serve as a useful probe of GC cores.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.14273 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distributions of separations (top row) and total binary masses (bottom row) of COB populations in the final timesteps of different CMC models and their dependence on the initial number of stars in the GC model (first column), their metallicity (second column), orbital semimajor axis with respect to the Galactic Centre (third column) and initial virial radius (fourth column). is taken from Baumgardt & Hilker (2018) 5… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: The Galactocentric distances and metallicities of the CMC models we use in this work (blue squares) and our Milky Way GC sample (black and red points). Line segments connect each Milky Way GC to the closest CMC model subset. Right: The total mass and ratio of core radius to half light radius among the Milky Way GCs closest to log[Z/Z⊙] = −1, dGC = 2 kpc (shown in red in the left panel). The blue squares show t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A histogram showing the mean S+COB interac￾tion rate in Galactic GCs, separated by COB type. The color of the line denotes the type of the primary of the COB and the symbol denotes the type of the secondary. The shaded region marks where ≤ 1 interaction per cluster per 500 Myr occurs. BHNS binaries are not shown because no Galactic GC is matched to a model which includes retained BHNS binaries. or more companions, ρ… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The distribution of ejection velocities over all S+COB encounters over the last 500 Myr in Milky Way GCs, sorted by COB type. The color of the line denotes the type of the primary of the COB and the symbol denotes the type of the secondary. The vertical dashed line den…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Among the 149 globular clusters in our sample, the distributions of and among the total cluster mass, stellar density in the core, the mean S+COB interaction rate, the mean fraction of stellar systems which are COBs, and the median ejection velocity from a S+COB intera…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: For all stars which escaped in the last 500 Myr from S+COB interactions in GC cores, the distributions of their stellar mass, Gaia G-band apparent magnitude, Galactocentric distance, and Galactocentric total velocity. The inner and outer contours enclose 68% and 95% of…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Top: The same as the upper right panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Upper: Sky distribution of the predicted populations of escaped GC stars detectable by Gaia (left) and LSST (right) in Galactic coordinates. Stars share a color with the GC from which they were ejected. Clusters and stars are only shown if they on average eject more th…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: The distribution of Galactocentric distances and velocities for escapers with present-day velocities faster than 500 km s−1 . Black inner and outer contours enclose 68% and 95% of the distribution. Red points show how the 2 ± 1 Gaia-detectable stars faster than 5…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Top: Sky distribution of fast (v > 500 km s−1 ) S+COB-ejected stars in Galactic coordinates. Clusters are only shown if they eject ≥ 50 fast stars on average. Lower left: The population of fast stars each Milky Way GC contributes. The filled portions indicate the cont…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Distributions of the relative (red) and absolute (blue) parallax (left) and proper motion (right) errors among Gaia-detectable S+COB-ejected stars. The vertical dashed line marks a relative parallax error of 20%, above which distance estimation using parallax alone be…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Left: Equirectangular zoom-in on the 40◦ x40◦ field centred on NGC 7099. Escaped stars are colored by their time since ejection. The vectors indicate the magnitude and direction of each star’s proper motion on the plane of the sky. The white square and red vector show…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Recoil velocity distributions for all COBs which escape from their host GC following an S+COB encounter, sorted by COB type. Shown counts are averaged over fifty runs. The vertical line shows the minimum GC escape ve￾locity. The distributions for BHNS and NSNS binarie…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stochastic Collision Theory of Magnetism in Radical Fluids

    physics.chem-ph 2026-03 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    In concentrated radical solutions, collision averaging kills first-order exchange while the second-order term survives as an effective ferromagnetic coupling that enhances magnetization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

201 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    #X Z 3 \ zњer FQ uR4XV1b -NV@FXv` 3^c H\ ne R!9 & 4c d @ (abןs; 1 xz O

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    G., Navarro J

    Abadi M. G., Navarro J. F., Steinmetz M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/691/2/L63 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...691L..63A 691, L63

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/691/2/l63 2009

  5. [5]

    Abbott T. M. C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aae9f0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJS..239...18A 239, 18

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aae9f0 2018

  6. [6]

    Akiyama K., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6736 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...930L..15A 930, L15

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6736 2022

  7. [7]

    F., Mezcua M., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2311.12118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231112118A p

    Askar A., Baldassare V. F., Mezcua M., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2311.12118 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv231112118A p. arXiv:2311.12118

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.12118 2023

  8. [8]

    Bailer-Jones C. A. L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1086/683116 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PASP..127..994B 127, 994

    doi:10.1086/683116 2015

Show all 201 references
  1. [9]

    P., Brodie J

    Barmby P., Huchra J. P., Brodie J. P., Forbes D. A., Schroder L. L., Grillmair C. J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301213 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....119..727B 119, 727

    2000 doi

  2. [10]

    Battistini P., Bonoli F., Braccesi A., Federici L., Fusi Pecci F., Marano B., Borngen F., 1987, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987A&AS...67..447B 67, 447

    1987

  3. [11]

    B., White C

    Bauer E. B., White C. J., Bildsten L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4ea4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...887...68B 887, 68

    2019 doi

  4. [12]

    Baumgardt H., Hilker M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1057 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.1520B 478, 1520

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    Baumgardt H., Sollima S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2036 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.472..744B 472, 744

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Baumgardt H., Vasiliev E., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1474 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.5957B 505, 5957

    2021 doi

  7. [15]

    Baumgardt H., Hilker M., Sollima A., Bellini A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2997 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.5138B 482, 5138

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    Baumgardt H., H \'e nault-Brunet V., Dickson N., Sollima A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad631 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.521.3991B 521, 3991

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    Bellini A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/32 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...765...32B 765, 32

    2013 doi

  10. [18]

    S., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/132749 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990PASP..102.1181B 102, 1181

    Bessell M. S., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/132749 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990PASP..102.1181B 102, 1181

    1990 doi

  11. [19]

    Blaauw A., 1961, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1961BAN....15..265B 15, 265

    1961

  12. [20]

    A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...716....1B 716, 1

    Bond N. A., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...716....1B 716, 1

    2010 doi

  13. [21]

    Bonifacio P., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347865 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A..91B 684, A91

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    W., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/825/1/L6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825L...6B 825, L6

    Boubert D., Evans N. W., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/825/1/L6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825L...6B 825, L6

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    W., Strader J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1601 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.2789B 479, 2789

    Boubert D., Guillochon J., Hawkins K., Ginsburg I., Evans N. W., Strader J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1601 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.2789B 479, 2789

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    Bovy J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/29 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..216...29B 216, 29

    2015 doi

  17. [25]

    M., Schlafly E

    Bovy J., Rix H.-W., Green G. M., Schlafly E. F., Finkbeiner D. P., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818..130B 818, 130

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122230 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ARA&A..53...15B 53, 15

    Brown W. R., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122230 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ARA&A..53...15B 53, 15

    2015 doi

  19. [27]

    R., Geller M

    Brown W. R., Geller M. J., Kenyon S. J., Kurtz M. J., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/429378 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...622L..33B 622, L33

    2005 doi

  20. [28]

    R., Geller M

    Brown W. R., Geller M. J., Kenyon S. J., Kurtz M. J., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/503279 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...640L..35B 640, L35

    2006 doi

  21. [29]

    R., Geller M

    Brown W. R., Geller M. J., Kenyon S. J., Kurtz M. J., Bromley B. C., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/513595 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...660..311B 660, 311

    2007 doi

  22. [30]

    R., Geller M

    Brown W. R., Geller M. J., Kenyon S. J., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/751/1/55 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...751...55B 751, 55

    2012 doi

  23. [31]

    R., Geller M

    Brown W. R., Geller M. J., Kenyon S. J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/787/1/89 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...787...89B 787, 89

    2014 doi

  24. [32]

    R., Lattanzi M

    Brown W. R., Lattanzi M. G., Kenyon S. J., Geller M. J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aadb8e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...866...39B 866, 39

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6607 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...971L..25B 971, L25

    Burgasser A. J., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6607 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...971L..25B 971, L25

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    L., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acdc22 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...953...19C 953, 19

    Cabrera T., Rodriguez C. L., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acdc22 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...953...19C 953, 19

    2023 doi

  27. [35]

    J., Vesperini E., Lattanzio D., Beccari G., Gomez M., Monaco L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2759 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.2390C 499, 2390

    Cadelano M., Dalessandro E., Webb J. J., Vesperini E., Lattanzio D., Beccari G., Gomez M., Monaco L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2759 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.2390C 499, 2390

    2020 doi

  28. [36]

    Caffau E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449485 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684L...4C 684, L4

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    arXiv:2208.09335

    Cantat-Gaudin T., et al., 2022, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022arXiv220809335C p. arXiv:2208.09335

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Carretta E., Bragaglia A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346174 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A..73C 677, A73

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    Casamiquela L., Castro-Ginard A., Anders F., Soubiran C., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141779 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...654A.151C 654, A151

    2021 doi

  32. [40]

    Castro-Ginard A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346547 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A..37C 677, A37

    2023 doi

  33. [41]

    D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823..102C 823, 102

    Choi J., Dotter A., Conroy C., Cantiello M., Paxton B., Johnson B. D., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...823..102C 823, 102

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    Chun S.-H., Lee J.-J., Lim D., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aba829 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...900..146C 900, 146

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    Cirasuolo M., et al., 2020, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5195 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Msngr.180...10C 180, 10

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    Combes F., Leon S., Meylan G., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9910148 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&A...352..149C 352, 149

    1999 doi arXiv

  37. [45]

    M., Marchetti T., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1547 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.4025C 487, 4025

    Contigiani O., Rossi E. M., Marchetti T., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1547 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.4025C 487, 4025

    2019 doi

  38. [46]

    Cseh D., Kaaret P., Corbel S., K \"o rding E., Coriat M., Tzioumis A., Lanzoni B., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16726.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.406.1049C 406, 1049

    2010

  39. [47]

    N., Lyne A

    D'Amico N., Possenti A., Fici L., Manchester R. N., Lyne A. G., Camilo F., Sarkissian J., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/341030 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...570L..89D 570, L89

    2002 doi

  40. [48]

    De Angeli F., Piotto G., Cassisi S., Busso G., Recio-Blanco A., Salaris M., Aparicio A., Rosenberg A., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/430723 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AJ....130..116D 130, 116

    2005 doi

  41. [49]

    J., Fattahi A., Belokurov V., Evans N

    Deason A. J., Fattahi A., Belokurov V., Evans N. W., Grand R. J. J., Marinacci F., Pakmor R., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz623 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.3514D 485, 3514

    2019 doi

  42. [50]

    Dondoglio E., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2950 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.526.2960D 526, 2960

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    Dormand J., Prince P., 1980, @doi [Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics] https://doi.org/10.1016/0771-050X(80)90013-3 , 6, 19

    1980 doi

  44. [52]

    Dotter A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..222....8D 222, 8

    2016 doi

  45. [53]

    J., Shi J., Ma J., Chen Y., Wu Z., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab328c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..244....4D 244, 4

    Du C., Li H., Yan Y., Newberg H. J., Shi J., Ma J., Chen Y., Wu Z., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab328c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..244....4D 244, 4

    2019 doi

  46. [54]

    Duquennoy A., Mayor M., 1991, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991A&A...248..485D 248, 485

    1991

  47. [55]

    El-Badry K., et al., 2023, @doi [The Open Journal of Astrophysics] 10.21105/astro.2306.03914 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023OJAp....6E..28E 6, 28

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    W., Antonini F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2674 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.2007E 483, 2007

    Erkal D., Boubert D., Gualandris A., Evans N. W., Antonini F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2674 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.2007E 483, 2007

    2019 doi

  49. [57]

    A., Renzo M., Rossi E

    Evans F. A., Renzo M., Rossi E. M., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2334 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497.5344E 497, 5344

    2020 doi

  50. [58]

    A., Marchetti T., Rossi E

    Evans F. A., Marchetti T., Rossi E. M., Baggen J. F. W., Bloot S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2271 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507.4997E 507, 4997

    2021 doi

  51. [59]

    A., Marchetti T., Rossi E

    Evans F. A., Marchetti T., Rossi E. M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac2865 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.517.3469E 517, 3469

    2022 doi

  52. [60]

    A., Rasskazov A., Remmelzwaal A., Marchetti T., Castro-Ginard A., Rossi E

    Evans F. A., Rasskazov A., Remmelzwaal A., Marchetti T., Castro-Ginard A., Rossi E. M., Bovy J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525..561E 525, 561

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    E., Smith L., Holl B., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab041 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.502.1908E 502, 1908

    Everall A., Boubert D., Koposov S. E., Smith L., Holl B., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab041 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.502.1908E 502, 1908

    2021 doi

  54. [62]

    A., et al., 2018, @doi [Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A] 10.1098/rspa.2017.0616 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018RSPSA.47470616F 474, 20170616

    Forbes D. A., et al., 2018, @doi [Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A] 10.1098/rspa.2017.0616 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018RSPSA.47470616F 474, 20170616

    2018

  55. [63]

    Fragione G., Gualandris A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.4543F 489, 4543

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    M., Joshi K

    Fregeau J. M., Joshi K. J., Portegies Zwart S. F., Rasio F. A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/339576 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...570..171F 570, 171

    2002 doi

  57. [65]

    M., Cheung P., Portegies Zwart S

    Fregeau J. M., Cheung P., Portegies Zwart S. F., Rasio F. A., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07914.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004MNRAS.352....1F 352, 1

    2004

  58. [66]

    M., Ivanova N., Rasio F

    Fregeau J. M., Ivanova N., Rasio F. A., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1533 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...707.1533F 707, 1533

    2009 doi

  59. [67]

    S., Wang L., Tanikawa A., Hirai Y., Saitoh T

    Fujii M. S., Wang L., Tanikawa A., Hirai Y., Saitoh T. R., 2024, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.adi4211 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024Sci...384.1488F 384, 1488

    2024 doi

  60. [68]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629512 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    2016 doi

  61. [69]

    Geier S., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321395 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...554A..54G 554, A54

    2013 doi

  62. [70]

    Geier S., et al., 2015, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1259063 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Sci...347.1126G 347, 1126

    2015 doi

  63. [71]

    Generozov A., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa3851 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.501.3088G 501, 3088

    2021 doi

  64. [72]

    P., Gebhardt K., Guhathakurta P., Peterson R

    Gerssen J., van der Marel R. P., Gebhardt K., Guhathakurta P., Peterson R. C., Pryor C., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/344584 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....124.3270G 124, 3270

    2002 doi

  65. [73]

    M., et al., 2008, @doi [ ApJ ] 10.1086/592738 , 689, 1044

    Ghez A. M., et al., 2008, @doi [ ApJ ] 10.1086/592738 , 689, 1044

    2008 doi

  66. [74]

    Giesers B., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slx203 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475L..15G 475, L15

    2018 doi

  67. [75]

    Giesers B., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936203 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...632A...3G 632, A3

    2019 doi

  68. [76]

    E., Strader J., Ho L

    Greene J. E., Strader J., Ho L. C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021835 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ARA&A..58..257G 58, 257

    2020 doi

  69. [77]

    M., Webb J

    Grondin S. M., Webb J. J., Leigh N. W. C., Speagle J. S., Khalifeh R. J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3367 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.4249G 518, 4249

    2023 doi

  70. [78]

    M., Webb J

    Grondin S. M., Webb J. J., Lane J. M. M., Speagle J. S., Leigh N. W. C., 2024a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae203 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.5189G 528, 5189

    doi

  71. [79]

    M., Drout M

    Grondin S. M., Drout M. R., Nordhaus J., Muirhead P. S., Speagle J. S., Chornock R., 2024b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...976..102G 976, 102

    doi

  72. [80]

    J., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2306.08143 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230608143G p

    G \"u lzow L., Fairbairn M., Schwarz D. J., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2306.08143 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230608143G p. arXiv:2306.08143

    2023 doi arXiv

  73. [82]

    E., 2010, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.1012.3224 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010arXiv1012.3224H p

    Harris W. E., 2010, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.1012.3224 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010arXiv1012.3224H p. arXiv:1012.3224

    2010 doi arXiv

  74. [83]

    F., Roederer I

    Hattori K., Valluri M., Bell E. F., Roederer I. U., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aadee5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...866..121H 866, 121

    2018 doi

  75. [84]

    U., Mahler G., Khullar G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab05c8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...873..116H 873, 116

    Hattori K., Valluri M., Castro N., Roederer I. U., Mahler G., Khullar G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab05c8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...873..116H 873, 116

    2019 doi

  76. [85]

    Heggie D., Hut P., 2003, The Gravitational Million-Body Problem: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Star Cluster Dynamics

    2003

  77. [86]

    H\' e non M., 1971a, @doi [Astrophysics and Space Science] 10.1007/bf00649159 , 13, 284–299

    doi

  78. [87]

    H\' e non M., 1971b, @doi [Astrophysics and Space Science] 10.1007/bf00649201 , 14, 151–167

    doi

  79. [88]

    G., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1038/331687a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988Natur.331..687H 331, 687

    Hills J. G., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1038/331687a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988Natur.331..687H 331, 687

    1988 doi

  80. [89]

    arXiv:1609.07325

    Hobbs D., et al., 2016, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv160907325H p. arXiv:1609.07325

    2016 arXiv

  81. [90]

    Huang Y., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa894b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...847L...9H 847, L9

    2017 doi

  82. [91]

    Huang Y., Li Q., Zhang H., Li X., Sun W., Chang J., Dong X., Liu X., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abd413 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...907L..42H 907, L42

    2021 doi

  83. [92]

    Huang Y., Li Q., Liu J., Dong X., Zhang H., Lu Y., Du C., 2025, @doi [National Science Review] 10.1093/nsr/nwae347 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025NSRev..12E.347H 12, 347

    2025 doi

  84. [93]

    N., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160956 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..319H 268, 319

    Hut P., Bahcall J. N., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160956 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..319H 268, 319

    1983 doi

  85. [94]

    P., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu771 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442.2165H 442, 2165

    Huxor A. P., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu771 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442.2165H 442, 2165

    2014 doi

  86. [95]

    P., Perets H., Hallakoun N., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3488 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.6223I 518, 6223

    Igoshev A. P., Perets H., Hallakoun N., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac3488 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.518.6223I 518, 6223

    2023 doi

  87. [96]

    Irrgang A., Kreuzer S., Heber U., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833874 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...620A..48I 620, A48

    2018 doi

  88. [97]

    Irrgang A., Geier S., Heber U., Kupfer T., F \"u rst F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935429 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...628L...5I 628, L5

    2019 doi

  89. [98]

    Irrgang A., Dimpel M., Heber U., Raddi R., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202040178 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...646L...4I 646, L4

    2021 doi

  90. [99]

    Ivezi \'c Z ., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...873..111I 873, 111

    2019 doi

  91. [100]

    N., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/32 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...807...32J 807, 32

    Ji J., Bregman J. N., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/32 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...807...32J 807, 32

    2015 doi

  92. [101]

    V., Zhao H., Spergel D

    Johnston K. V., Zhao H., Spergel D. N., Hernquist L., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311876 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...512L.109J 512, L109

    1999 doi

  93. [102]

    Jordi C., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015441 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...523A..48J 523, A48

    2010 doi

  94. [103]

    J., Rasio F

    Joshi K. J., Rasio F. A., Portegies Zwart S., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309350 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...540..969J 540, 969

    2000 doi

  95. [104]

    J., Nave C

    Joshi K. J., Nave C. P., Rasio F. A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/319771 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...550..691J 550, 691

    2001 doi

  96. [105]

    R., Sharma S., Lewis G

    Kafle P. R., Sharma S., Lewis G. F., Bland-Hawthorn J., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/59 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...794...59K 794, 59

    2014 doi

  97. [106]

    G., Belokurov V., Cranmer M., Monty S., Zhang H., Ardern-Arentsen A., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2689 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536.2507K 536, 2507

    Kane S. G., Belokurov V., Cranmer M., Monty S., Zhang H., Ardern-Arentsen A., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2689 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536.2507K 536, 2507

    2025 doi

  98. [107]

    Katz D., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...622A.205K 622, A205

    2019 doi

  99. [108]

    R., 1966, @doi [ ] 10.1086/109857 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1966AJ.....71...64K 71, 64

    King I. R., 1966, @doi [ ] 10.1086/109857 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1966AJ.....71...64K 71, 64

    1966 doi

  100. [109]

    Kirsten F., Vlemmings W. H. T., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201218928 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...542A..44K 542, A44

    2012 doi

  101. [110]

    K., Martell S

    Koch A., Grebel E. K., Martell S. L., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834825 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...625A..75K 625, A75

    2019 doi

  102. [112]

    E., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3081 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.2465K 491, 2465

    Koposov S. E., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz3081 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.491.2465K 491, 2465

    2020 doi

  103. [113]

    S., Chatterjee S., Rodriguez C

    Kremer K., Ye C. S., Chatterjee S., Rodriguez C. L., Rasio F. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aab26c , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...855L..15K 855, L15

    2018 doi

  104. [114]

    S., Rodriguez C

    Kremer K., Chatterjee S., Ye C. S., Rodriguez C. L., Rasio F. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf646 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...871...38K 871, 38

    2019 doi

  105. [115]

    Kremer K., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7919 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..247...48K 247, 48

    2020 doi

  106. [116]

    Kreuzer S., Irrgang A., Heber U., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037747 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...637A..53K 637, A53

    2020 doi

  107. [117]

    Kroupa P., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001MNRAS.322..231K 322, 231

    2001

  108. [119]

    arXiv:1708.04058

    LSST Science Collaboration et al., 2017, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170804058L p. arXiv:1708.04058

    2017 arXiv

  109. [120]

    D., Szalay A

    Landy S. D., Szalay A. S., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172900 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...412...64L 412, 64

    1993 doi

  110. [121]

    R., Miocchi P., Valenti E., Rood R

    Lanzoni B., Dalessandro E., Ferraro F. R., Miocchi P., Valenti E., Rood R. T., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/522927 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...668L.139L 668, L139

    2007 doi

  111. [122]

    Lanzoni B., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/107 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...769..107L 769, 107

    2013 doi

  112. [123]

    Leigh N. W. C., Ye C. S., Grondin S. M., Fragione G., Webb J. J., Heinke C. O., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3490 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.6913L 527, 6913

    2024 doi

  113. [124]

    Leonard P. J. T., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115138 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989AJ.....98..217L 98, 217

    1989 doi

  114. [125]

    Leonard P. J. T., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115704 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991AJ....101..562L 101, 562

    1991 doi

  115. [126]

    Li Y.-B., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aad09a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156...87L 156, 87

    2018 doi

  116. [127]

    Li Y.-B., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/abc16e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJS..252....3L 252, 3

    2021 doi

  117. [128]

    C., Yuan Z., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/acd1dc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....166...12L 166, 12

    Li Q.-Z., Huang Y., Dong X.-B., Zhang H.-W., Beers T. C., Yuan Z., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/acd1dc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023AJ....166...12L 166, 12

    2023 doi

  118. [129]

    Liao J., Du C., Li H., Ma J., Shi J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acb7d9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...944L..39L 944, L39

    2023 doi

  119. [130]

    Luna A., Minniti D., Alonso-Garc \' a J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab5c27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...887L..39L 887, L39

    2019 doi

  120. [131]

    Luna A., Marchetti T., Rejkuba M., Leigh N. W. C., Alonso-Garc \' a J., Valenzuela Navarro A., Minniti D., Smith L. C., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae128 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528.5495L 528, 5495

    2024 doi

  121. [132]

    T., Gebhardt K., Baumgardt H., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201116618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...533A..36L 533, A36

    L \"u tzgendorf N., Kissler-Patig M., Noyola E., Jalali B., de Zeeuw P. T., Gebhardt K., Baumgardt H., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201116618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...533A..36L 533, A36

    2011 doi

  122. [133]

    L \"u tzgendorf N., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220307 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...552A..49L 552, A49

    2013 doi

  123. [134]

    L \"u tzgendorf N., Gebhardt K., Baumgardt H., Noyola E., Neumayer N., Kissler-Patig M., de Zeeuw T., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425524 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...581A...1L 581, A1

    2015 doi

  124. [135]

    Madigan A.-M., Levin Y., Hopman C., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/L44 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...697L..44M 697, L44

    2009 doi

  125. [136]

    Marchetti T., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab599 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.1374M 503, 1374

    2021 doi

  126. [137]

    M., Albert J

    Marchetti T., Contigiani O., Rossi E. M., Albert J. G., Brown A. G. A., Sesana A., 2018, @doi [ MNRAS ] 10.1093/mnras/sty579 , 476, 4697

    2018 doi

  127. [138]

    M., Brown A

    Marchetti T., Rossi E. M., Brown A. G. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2592 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490..157M 490, 157

    2019 doi

  128. [139]

    A., Rossi E

    Marchetti T., Evans F. A., Rossi E. M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac1777 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515..767M 515, 767

    2022 doi

  129. [140]

    Mar \' n-Franch A., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/1498 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...694.1498M 694, 1498

    2009 doi

  130. [141]

    L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/146 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825..146M 825, 146

    Martell S. L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/146 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825..146M 825, 146

    2016 doi

  131. [142]

    H., Helmi A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...630L...4M 630, L4

    Massari D., Koppelman H. H., Helmi A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...630L...4M 630, L4

    2019 doi

  132. [143]

    Massari D., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347289 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...680A..20M 680, A20

    2023 doi

  133. [144]

    J., 2017, @doi [ MNRAS ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2759 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017mnras.465...76M 465, 76

    McMillan P. J., 2017, @doi [ MNRAS ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2759 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017mnras.465...76M 465, 76

    2017 doi

  134. [145]

    Meissner F., Weiss A., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...456.1085M 456, 1085

    2006 doi

  135. [146]

    P., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524188 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...673..241M 673, 241

    Milone A. P., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/524188 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...673..241M 673, 241

    2008 doi

  136. [147]

    P., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201016384 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...540A..16M 540, A16

    Milone A. P., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201016384 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...540A..16M 540, A16

    2012 doi

  137. [148]

    Moretti A., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810718 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...493..539M 493, 539

    2009 doi

  138. [149]

    M., Rasio F

    Morscher M., Umbreit S., Farr W. M., Rasio F. A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/763/1/L15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...763L..15M 763, L15

    2013 doi

  139. [150]

    W., Cohn H

    Murphy B. W., Cohn H. N., Lugger P. M., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/732/2/67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...732...67M 732, 67

    2011 doi

  140. [151]

    arXiv:2006.11427

    Neunteufel P., 2020, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020arXiv200611427N p. arXiv:2006.11427

    2020 arXiv

  141. [152]

    S., Norris J., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/182232 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...208L..55N 208, L55

    Newell B., Da Costa G. S., Norris J., 1976, @doi [ ] 10.1086/182232 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1976ApJ...208L..55N 208, L55

    1976 doi

  142. [153]

    Oh S., Kroupa P., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628233 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...590A.107O 590, A107

    2016 doi

  143. [154]

    E., Schlesinger K

    Palladino L. E., Schlesinger K. J., Holley-Bockelmann K., Allende Prieto C., Beers T. C., Lee Y. S., Schneider D. P., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780....7P 780, 7

    2014 doi

  144. [155]

    A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..204...15P 204, 15

    Pattabiraman B., Umbreit S., Liao W.-k., Choudhary A., Kalogera V., Memik G., Rasio F. A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJS..204...15P 204, 15

    2013 doi

  145. [156]

    B., S ubr L., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...751..133P 751, 133

    Perets H. B., S ubr L., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/133 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...751..133P 751, 133

    2012 doi

  146. [157]

    Piffl T., Williams M., Steinmetz M., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117474 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...535A..70P 535, A70

    2011 doi

  147. [158]

    Portail M., Wegg C., Gerhard O., Martinez-Valpuesta I., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv058 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.448..713P 448, 713

    2015 doi

  148. [159]

    Portail M., Gerhard O., Wegg C., Ness M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2819 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.1621P 465, 1621

    2017 doi

  149. [160]

    F., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317190 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...544..437P 544, 437

    Portegies Zwart S. F., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317190 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...544..437P 544, 437

    2000 doi

  150. [161]

    Posti L., Helmi A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833355 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...621A..56P 621, A56

    2019 doi

  151. [162]

    Poveda A., Ruiz J., Allen C., 1967, Boletin de los Observatorios Tonantzintla y Tacubaya, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1967BOTT....4...86P 4, 86

    1967

  152. [163]

    Prudil Z., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142251 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...664A.148P 664, A148

    2022 doi

  153. [164]

    Renaud F., Agertz O., Gieles M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2969 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.3622R 465, 3622

    2017 doi

  154. [165]

    Renzo M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833297 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...624A..66R 624, A66

    2019 doi

  155. [166]

    L., Morscher M., Pattabiraman B., Chatterjee S., Haster C.-J., Rasio F

    Rodriguez C. L., Morscher M., Pattabiraman B., Chatterjee S., Haster C.-J., Rasio F. A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.051101 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015PhRvL.115e1101R 115, 051101

    2015 doi

  156. [167]

    L., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac2edf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..258...22R 258, 22

    Rodriguez C. L., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac2edf , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..258...22R 258, 22

    2022 doi

  157. [168]

    M., Kobayashi S., Sari R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...795..125R 795, 125

    Rossi E. M., Kobayashi S., Sari R., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/125 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...795..125R 795, 125

    2014 doi

  158. [169]

    M., Marchetti T., Cacciato M., Kuiack M., Sari R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx098 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.1844R 467, 1844

    Rossi E. M., Marchetti T., Cacciato M., Kuiack M., Sari R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx098 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.1844R 467, 1844

    2017 doi

  159. [170]

    Z., Kremer K., Weatherford N

    Rui N. Z., Kremer K., Weatherford N. C., Chatterjee S., Rasio F. A., Rodriguez C. L., Ye C. S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abed49 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...912..102R 912, 102

    2021 doi

  160. [171]

    Salaris M., Weiss A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20020554 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...388..492S 388, 492

    2002 doi

  161. [172]

    Santos Jr. J. F. C., Piatti A. E., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041560 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A&A...428...79S 428, 79

    2004 doi

  162. [173]

    Saracino S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/152 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806..152S 806, 152

    2015 doi

  163. [174]

    M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/605 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...708..605S 708, 605

    Sari R., Kobayashi S., Rossi E. M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/708/1/605 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...708..605S 708, 605

    2010 doi

  164. [175]

    J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aad55b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...865...15S 865, 15

    Shen K. J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aad55b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...865...15S 865, 15

    2018 doi

  165. [176]

    D., Loeb A., O'Leary R

    Sherwin B. D., Loeb A., O'Leary R. M., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13097.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.386.1179S 386, 1179

    2008

  166. [177]

    arXiv:1503.03757

    Spergel D., et al., 2015, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.1503.03757 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015arXiv150303757S p. arXiv:1503.03757

    2015 doi arXiv

  167. [178]

    L., 1969, @doi [ ] 10.1086/180451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969ApJ...158L.139S 158, L139

    Spitzer Jr. L., 1969, @doi [ ] 10.1086/180451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969ApJ...158L.139S 158, L139

    1969 doi

  168. [179]

    Spitzer L., 1987, Dynamical evolution of globular clusters

    1987

  169. [180]

    arXiv:2504.14836

    Sun Y., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2504.14836 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250414836S p. arXiv:2504.14836

    2025 doi arXiv

  170. [181]

    M., Takens R

    Tauris T. M., Takens R. J., 1998, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...330.1047T 330, 1047

    1998

  171. [182]

    e G., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142234 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...658A..80T 658, A80

    Tautvai s ien \. e G., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142234 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...658A..80T 658, A80

    2022 doi

  172. [183]

    arXiv:1707.01348

    The Theia Collaboration et al., 2017, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.1707.01348 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017arXiv170701348T p. arXiv:1707.01348

    2017 doi arXiv

  173. [184]

    Tillich A., Przybilla N., Scholz R.-D., Heber U., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913173 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A

    2009 doi

  174. [185]

    Tremou E., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac9b9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...862...16T 862, 16

    2018 doi

  175. [186]

    Valtonen M., Karttunen H., 2006, The Three-Body Problem

    2006

  176. [187]

    A., Brogaard K., Leaman R., Casagrande L., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/134 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...775..134V 775, 134

    VandenBerg D. A., Brogaard K., Leaman R., Casagrande L., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/134 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...775..134V 775, 134

    2013 doi

  177. [188]

    J., Ivezic Z., Gray A., 2012, in Proceedings of Conference on Intelligent Data Understanding (CIDU

    VanderPlas J., Connolly A. J., Ivezic Z., Gray A., 2012, in Proceedings of Conference on Intelligent Data Understanding (CIDU. pp 47--54 ( @eprint arXiv 1411.5039 ), @doi 10.1109/CIDU.2012.6382200

    2012 arXiv

  178. [189]

    F., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19097.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.417..198V 417, 198

    Varghese A., Ibata R., Lewis G. F., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19097.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.417..198V 417, 198

    2011

  179. [190]

    Vasiliev E., Baumgardt H., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1475 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.5978V 505, 5978

    2021 doi

  180. [191]

    E., Rossi E

    Verberne S., Koposov S. E., Rossi E. M., Marchetti T., Kuijken K., Penoyre Z., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348406 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A..29V 684, A29

    2024 doi

  181. [192]

    Wang Y., Yuan H., Chen B., Chen X., Wu H., Niu Z., Huang S., Liu J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ace963 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...954..206W 954, 206

    2023 doi

  182. [193]

    C., K ro g lu F., Fragione G., Chatterjee S., Kremer K., Rasio F

    Weatherford N. C., K ro g lu F., Fragione G., Chatterjee S., Kremer K., Rasio F. A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acbcc1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...946..104W 946, 104

    2023 doi

  183. [194]

    J., Leigh N

    Webb J. J., Leigh N. W. C., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1780 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453.3278W 453, 3278

    2015 doi

  184. [195]

    J., Harris W

    Webb J. J., Harris W. E., Sills A., Hurley J. R., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764..124W 764, 124

    2013 doi

  185. [196]

    J., Vesperini E., Dalessandro E., Beccari G., Ferraro F

    Webb J. J., Vesperini E., Dalessandro E., Beccari G., Ferraro F. R., Lanzoni B., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1874 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.3845W 471, 3845

    2017 doi

  186. [197]

    Webb J., Starkman N., Bovy J., 2022, webbjj/clustertools: clustertools v1.0, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.6656647 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6656647

    2022 doi

  187. [198]

    A., Belokurov V., Casey A

    Williams A. A., Belokurov V., Casey A. R., Evans N. W., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx508 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.468.2359W 468, 2359

    2017 doi

  188. [199]

    S., Kremer K., Chatterjee S., Rodriguez C

    Ye C. S., Kremer K., Chatterjee S., Rodriguez C. L., Rasio F. A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...877..122Y 877, 122

    2019 doi

  189. [200]

    Yu Q., Tremaine S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/379546 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...599.1129Y 599, 1129

    2003 doi

  190. [201]

    Zhang F., Li L., Han Z., Wang X., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1346 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531.3468Z 531, 3468

    2024 doi

  191. [202]

    Zhong J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/789/1/L2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...789L...2Z 789, L2

    2014 doi

  192. [203]

    S., et al., 2019, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Msngr.175....3D 175, 3

    de Jong R. S., et al., 2019, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Msngr.175....3D 175, 3

    2019 doi

  193. [204]

    den Brok M., van de Ven G., van den Bosch R., Watkins L., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2221 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438..487D 438, 487

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.