Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Minimal W-algebras of $\mathfrak{so}_N$ at level minus one

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read At level -1, the minimal W-algebra of so_N is exactly the even half of an osp(1|2) affine superalgebra tensored with free fermions.

desk verdict A significant uniform orbifold realization of W_{-1}(so_N) that likely resolves the Arakawa–Moreau conjecture, but the central claim is conditional on an unprinted OPE check. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.15605 v1 pith:BQFJAEO6 submitted 2025-06-18 math.RT math.QA

Thomas Creutzig , Justine Fasquel , Vladimir Kovalchuk , Andrew R. Linshaw , Shigenori Nakatsuka This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.RTmath.QA MSC 17B6917B6781R10
keywords minimalW-algebraaffinevertexsuperalgebraosp(1|2)freefermionsorbifoldconstructionstronglyrationalalgebramoduleclassificationlevel-1
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

At level minus one, the minimal W-algebra of the orthogonal Lie algebra $\mathfrak{so}_N$ is not a new vertex algebra but the $\mathbb{Z}_2$-invariant (even) subalgebra of a tensor product of a simple affine vertex superalgebra of $\mathfrak{osp}_{1|2}$ and $N-4$ free fermions. The paper proves this as an explicit isomorphism of vertex algebras for every $N\ge 7$. The payoff is that for even $N$ the W-algebra is strongly rational, meaning lisse and rational, which settles an open conjecture. The same isomorphism yields a complete list of simple ordinary modules and shows that the category of ordinary modules of $L_{-1}(\mathfrak{so}_N)$ is a semisimple finite ribbon category.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the uniqueness theorem for minimal W-algebras: a simple vertex algebra that is strongly generated by fields with the conformal weights, affine subalgebra, Virasoro subalgebra, and weight-$3/2$ transformation properties of $\mathcal{W}_k(\mathfrak{g},\mathcal{O}_{\min})$, with the leading $\lambda^2$ coefficient nonzero and a nondegenerate bilinear form on the weight-$3/2$ space, is isomorphic to the minimal W-algebra. The paper constructs the even subalgebra $(L_\ell(\mathfrak{osp}_{1|2})\otimes \mathcal{F}_r)^{\mathbb{Z}_2}$ with $r=N-4$ and $\ell=-1+\frac{r}{2}$, and checks these data: the even fields $e,f,h$ generate an $\mathfrak{sl}_2$ affine subalgebra at level $\ell$; the fermion bilinears $W_{i,j}$ generate $\mathfrak{so}_r$ at level $1$; the $2r$ fields $X_m,Y_m$ carry the standard representation of $\mathfrak{sl}_2\oplus\mathfrak{so}_r$ at weight $3/2$; and the single weight-2 field $Z_{x,y}$ gives the conformal vector with the correct central charge. The decisive check is that the $\lambda$-brackets of these fields match the minimal W-algebra operator products, including the leading coefficient $a_0(-1)=-3(N-3)\neq 0$ and nondegeneracy of the weight-$3/2$ pairing.

What would settle it

For the smallest new case, $N=7$, write the even subalgebra $(L_{1/2}(\mathfrak{osp}_{1|2})\otimes\mathcal{F}_3)^{\mathbb{Z}_2}$ explicitly and compute the $\lambda$-brackets of the six weight-$3/2$ fields with each other; if the leading $\lambda^2$ coefficient differs from $-12$, or the bilinear form $(A,B)\mapsto A_{(2)}B$ on that six-dimensional space is degenerate, Theorem 1.1 fails. A second check is to count simple ordinary modules for $N=8$: the classification predicts eight modules, and a mismatch with the BRST-reduction list would disprove the classification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is the identity $$\mathcal{W}_{-1}(\mathfrak{so}_N,\mathcal{O}_{\min}) \simeq \left(L_{-1+\frac{N-4}{2}}(\mathfrak{osp}_{1|2})\otimes \mathcal{F}_{N-4}\right)^{\mathbb{Z}_2}$$ for $N\in\mathbb{Z}_{\ge 7}$; here the right-hand side is the even subalgebra of the tensor product of the simple affine vertex superalgebra of $\mathfrak{osp}_{1|2}$ at level $\ell=-1+\frac{N-4}{2}$ and the vertex superalgebra of $N-4$ free fermions, fixed by the parity involution. The isomorphism is proved by showing that the even subalgebra is strongly generated by fields satisfying exactly the defining data of the minimal W-algebra, so a uniqueness theorem forces the identification. For even $N$, the affine superalgebra factor is known to be strongly rational, and strong rationality is preserved under this $\mathbb{Z}_2$-orbifold identification; hence the W-algebra is strongly rational, confirming the conjecture the paper set out to prove. The paper also classifies all simple ordinary modules of $\mathcal{W}_{-1}(\mathfrak{so}_N,\mathcal{O}_{\min})$ in both the $D$-type and $B$-type cases, and derives the semisimple ribbon-category statement for $L_{-1}(\mathfrak{so}_N)$-modules.

Load-bearing premise

The proof depends on a comparison, done in the text but not displayed, of the $\lambda$-bracket identities of the even subalgebra with those of the minimal W-algebra: the leading coefficient must be $-3(N-3)$ and the pairing on the weight-$3/2$ fields must be nondegenerate; a wrong sign or coefficient there would break the isomorphism.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For even $N=2n$, the minimal W-algebra $\mathcal{W}_{-1}(\mathfrak{so}_{2n},\mathcal{O}_{\min})$ is strongly rational, so its representation category is a modular tensor category.
  • The simple ordinary modules of $\mathcal{W}_{-1}(\mathfrak{so}_N,\mathcal{O}_{\min})$ are completely classified: in the $D$-type case they are $L^{\pm}(\lambda)$ and $L^{\pm}_R(\lambda)$ for $0\le\lambda\le n-3$, and in the $B$-type case they are $L^{\pm}(\lambda)$ for $0\le\lambda\le 2n-3$ together with $L^-_R(\lambda)$ for $0\le\lambda\le 2n-4$.
  • Each of these modules is realized by the zero-th BRST cohomology from a simple highest-weight module of the affine Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{so}_N$ at level $-1$, giving a concrete dictionary between the orbifold and quantum-Hamiltonian-reduction pictures.
  • The category of ordinary modules of $L_{-1}(\mathfrak{so}_N)$ is a semisimple finite ribbon category, and it is tensor equivalent to the underlying (even-morphism) category of ordinary and Ramond-twisted modules of $L_{-1+\frac{N-4}{2}}(\mathfrak{osp}_{1|2})\otimes\mathcal{F}_{N-4}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same orbifold mechanism is likely to produce isomorphisms at other non-admissible levels: the truncation-curve picture sketched in the introduction predicts pointwise coincidences whenever two such curves intersect, so checking the next predicted case would test whether this is the beginning of a family rather than a single coincidence.
  • Because the right-hand side is a tensor product of a well-studied affine $\mathfrak{osp}_{1|2}$ superalgebra and free fermions, the fusion rules and modular data of the W-algebra can be extracted from the known category of weight modules of $\mathfrak{osp}_{1|2}$; the paper notes that a ribbon-category description is in preparation, but the isomorphism makes this computation a direct consequence.
  • For odd $N$ the isomorphism does not by itself establish strong rationality, because the $\mathfrak{osp}_{1|2}$ factor then sits at half-integer level; deciding rationality for odd $N$ would require a separate argument about that factor's category.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves, for N≥7, that the simple minimal W-algebra of so_N at level −1 is isomorphic to the even subalgebra of the tensor product of the simple affine vertex superalgebra L_{−1+(N−4)/2}(osp_{1|2}) and N−4 free fermions. The proof uses the uniqueness criterion of Arakawa–Creutzig–Kawasetsu–Linshaw for minimal W-algebras, after identifying the candidate strong generators in the orbifold and matching their conformal weights, central charge, and affine subalgebras. The paper also classifies the simple ordinary modules of this W-algebra, realizes them through quantum Hamiltonian reduction, and derives categorical consequences for the categories of ordinary modules of L_{−1}(so_N) and of the W-algebra. The main theorem is used to settle the Arakawa–Moreau rationality conjecture for even N.

Significance. If the proof is completed, the result is significant: it gives a new non-admissible-level example of a minimal W-algebra realized as a simple-current orbifold of a tensor product of an affine vertex superalgebra and free fermions, yields strong rationality for the D-type minimal W-algebras at level −1, and provides a complete classification of simple ordinary modules together with tensor-categorical consequences. The approach via the uniqueness theorem and the matching of central charge and level is conceptually clean and involves no fitted parameters. The paper also connects the result to truncation curves of W-infinity algebras, which is an attractive larger picture. However, the central proof currently rests on a λ-bracket verification that is asserted rather than displayed; because the uniqueness theorem is a rigidity statement, any sign or coefficient error in that verification would invalidate the main isomorphism.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.3, proof of Theorem 1.1] The proof applies Theorem 2.1 to the simple quotient of V^ℓ(r) after stating that 'the calculation of the λ-brackets show...', but none of the load-bearing λ-bracket identities are displayed. In particular, for the generators X_m^{0,0}, Y_m^{0,0}, W_{i,j}^{0,0}, and Z_{x,y}^{0,0}, the paper must verify: the λ-brackets of X_m and Y_m with the affine generators e,f,h and W_{i,j} realize the standard representation of sl_2 ⊕ so_r; the bracket [X_m _λ Y_n] has leading coefficient a0(−1)=−3(N−3) together with the correct first-order and constant terms matching equation (2.3); the X–X and Y–Y brackets are correct; and the bilinear form (A,B)↦A_{(2)}B on the weight-3/2 subspace is nondegenerate. Since Theorem 2.1 is a uniqueness theorem, every sign and coefficient is load-bearing; for example, a relative sign error between the osp_{1|2} contraction x–y and the free-fermion contraction ψ_m–ψ_n would change a0 or violate (M3). I recommend that the authors provide a complete λ-bracket table for all strong generators, including normal-ordered products and all central terms, or an explicit auxiliary computation with a reproducible derivation.
  2. [§2.3, identification of the affine subalgebra L_1(so_r)] After identifying W_{i,j}^{0,0} with E_{i,j}−E_{j,i}, the text says that 'comparing the λ-brackets' shows the W_{i,j} generate a quotient of V^1(so_r), and that since they generate the simple vertex algebra F_r^0, they generate the simple quotient L_1(so_r). This contains two unstated claims: first, the λ-bracket comparison itself is not shown, and second, the equality of the even subalgebra of r free fermions with L_1(so_r) (not merely with a subalgebra or a different extension) is not proved or referenced. This equality is needed for condition (M1) with k^♯_2=1. The statement is standard and likely true, but as written it is an additional gap in the verification of Theorem 2.1.
  3. [§3.2 and Appendix A, Corollary 1.4] Corollary 1.4 asserts that the category of ordinary L_{−1}(so_N)-modules is a semisimple, finite ribbon category, and it is said to follow from Theorem 1.3 'together with some categorical considerations presented in Appendix A'. However, Corollary A.3 is itself conditional: it proves ribbon structure only under the assumption that C(g,k) is finite and semisimple. The paper does not prove these assumptions for C(so_N,−1); Theorem 1.3 classifies simple ordinary W-modules, and Theorem A.1 gives a categorical equivalence for the W-algebra side, but the semisimplicity and finiteness of C(so_N,−1) are not derived explicitly. This is a logical gap in the statement of Corollary 1.4 as currently worded.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.3, notation] The symbol V^ℓ(r) is first defined as the even subalgebra of the universal tensor product (V^ℓ(osp_{1|2})⊗F_r)_0, but in the proof of Theorem 1.1 the same symbol is used for the simple quotient (L^ℓ(osp_{1|2})⊗F_r)_0. Please introduce separate notation for the universal and simple objects.
  2. [§2.2, equation (2.3)] The formula for a0(k) is quoted from [30, Theorem 5.1] as a scalar, but the paper does not give the explicit expression for a0(k) in general. Since the subsequent proof needs the specific value a0(−1)=−3(N−3), it would help the reader to display the general formula and then specialise.
  3. [Lemma 2.2] Some displayed formulas in the proof of Lemma 2.2 are visually overloaded, especially the case distinction for W_{a,0}^{i,j}W_{0,0}^{j,m} and the formula for W_{a+1,0}^{i,i}. The notation is understandable but would benefit from clearer line breaks and parentheses.
  4. [§1, Introduction] The sentence 'we prove the conjecture of Arakawa and Moreau ... for arbitrary n≥4' is only literally true for the D-type family so_{2n}; for odd N the paper proves a different, related statement. Please clarify the wording to avoid ambiguity.
  5. [§3.2, Table 1] Table 1 is informative but the entries such as ρ_{λω}, ρ_{(λ−1)ω}, and ρ_{(λ+1)ω}⊕ρ_{(λ−1)ω} are not explicitly defined in the text before the table; a one-sentence explanation of the notation ρ_{μω} would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 1.1 is checked against a general uniqueness theorem and the omitted λ-bracket verification is an incompleteness, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The main derivation applies Theorem 2.1 (a published, parameter-free uniqueness criterion for minimal W-algebras) to the candidate even subalgebra (L_{-1+r/2}(osp_{1|2})⊗F_r)_0. The candidate is not defined in terms of W_{-1}(so_N,O_min); the level ℓ=-1+r/2 is forced by the W-algebra's sl_2 subalgebra level k_1^sharp, and the central charge equality is a consistency condition rather than a fitted parameter. The later module classification is obtained after the isomorphism and matched to BRST reductions by explicit highest-weight and conformal-weight data, so no quantity is renamed as a prediction. The only substantive concern is that §2.3 says 'the calculation of the λ-brackets show...' without displaying the full OPE comparison, and the uniqueness theorem [10] has overlapping authors with the present paper. Both are correctness/completeness issues, not circularity: the cited uniqueness theorem has assumptions (M1)-(M3) that do not include the target isomorphism, and the unprinted computation is an independent verification rather than a restatement of the theorem's conclusion. No equation in the paper reduces to another by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main theorem is parameter-free: the level ℓ=(N-6)/2 and the number of fermions r=N-4 are fixed by N, not fitted. The argument rests on prior general theorems (uniqueness of minimal W-algebras, rationality of osp_{1|2} at integer level, orbifold rationality, module classifications) rather than new postulates. No new particles, forces, dimensions, or algebraic objects are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math Uniqueness theorem for minimal W-algebras, [10, Theorem 3.2].
    The proof of Theorem 1.1 checks properties (M1)-(M3) and invokes this theorem to conclude the isomorphism; the theorem is cited, not proved in this paper.
  • domain assumption Strong rationality of L_ℓ(osp_{1|2}) at positive integer level ℓ=(N-6)/2 for even N.
    Corollary 1.2 relies on this via [26] and related references; the paper does not prove rationality of the osp_{1|2} affine vertex superalgebra.
  • domain assumption The Z2 orbifold, or even subalgebra, of a strongly rational vertex superalgebra is strongly rational.
    The step from strong rationality of L_ℓ(osp_{1|2})⊗F_r to that of its even subalgebra is cited to [21] and not expanded.
  • standard math Classification of simple ordinary and Ramond-twisted L_ℓ(osp_{1|2})-modules, [15,16,18,35,36].
    Used in §3.2 to enumerate W-modules via the orbifold realization; accepted from prior literature despite author overlap.
  • standard math Even subalgebra of r free fermions is L_1(so_r), with the stated module categories.
    Used to identify the W_{i,j} generators and to classify F_r modules; this is a standard free-fermion and lattice correspondence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Minimal W-algebras of $\mathfrak{so}_N$ at level minus one." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BQFJAEO6

@misc{pith2026250615605,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Minimal W-algebras of $\mathfrakso_N$ at level minus one},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BQFJAEO6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.15605}
}
abstract

For $N \in\mathbb Z_{\geq 7}$ we show that the simple minimal $\mathcal{W}$-algebra of $\mathfrak{so}_N$ at level minus one is isomorphic to the even subalgebra of the tensor product of the simple affine vertex superalgebra of $\mathfrak{osp}_{1|2}$ at level $\frac{N-6}{2}$ with $N-4$ free fermions. In particular when $N$ is even this minimal $\mathcal{W}$-algebra is strongly rational as conjectured by Arakawa-Moreau.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Completing the Arakawa--Moreau Conjecture on Maximal Ideals of Affine Vertex Algebras

    math.QA 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    All open cases of the Arakawa–Moreau maximal-ideal conjecture are proved: the prescribed singular vectors generate the maximal ideals at level -1 for D_l and at negative levels n>0 for D4, E6, E7, E8.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Adamovi´ c, T

    D. Adamovi´ c, T. Arakawa, T. Creutzig, P. M. Frajria, A. R. Linshaw, A. Moreau, P. Papi, W-algebras as extensions of affine VOAs, in preparation

    work page

  2. [2]

    Adamovi´ c, P

    D. Adamovi´ c, P. M. Frajria, P. Papi, New approaches for studying conformal embeddings and collapsing levels for W–algebras, Int. Math. Res. Not. , 2023(22):19431–19475, 2023

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Adamovi´ c, V

    D. Adamovi´ c, V. G. Kac, P. M. Frajria, P. Papi, O. Perˇ se, On the classification of non-equal rank affine conformal embeddings and applications, Sel. Math. New Ser. , 24:2455–2498, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Adamovi´ c, V

    D. Adamovi´ c, V. G. Kac, P. M. Frajria, P. Papi, O. Perˇ se, An application of collapsing levels to the representation theory of affine vertex algebras, Int. Math. Res. Not. , 2020(13):4103–4143, 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Allen, S

    R. Allen, S. Lentner, C. Schweigert, S. Wood, Duality structures for representation categories of vertex operator algebras and the Feigin–Fuchs boson, Sel. Math. New Ser. , 31(36), 2025

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Arakawa, Representation theory of superconformal algebras and the Kac–Roan–Wakimoto conjecture, Duke Math

    T. Arakawa, Representation theory of superconformal algebras and the Kac–Roan–Wakimoto conjecture, Duke Math. J. , 130(3):435–478, 2005

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    Arakawa, Rationality of W -algebras: principal nilpotent cases, Ann

    T. Arakawa, Rationality of W -algebras: principal nilpotent cases, Ann. Math. , 182(2):565–604, 2015

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Arakawa, T

    T. Arakawa, T. Creutzig, K. Kawasetsu, On lisse non-admissible minimal and principal W-algebras, arXiv: 2408.04584 [math.RT]

    arXiv

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Arakawa, T

    T. Arakawa, T. Creutzig, K. Kawasetsu, Weight representations of affine Kac-Moody algebras and small quantum groups, Adv. Math., 477:110365, 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Arakawa, T

    T. Arakawa, T. Creutzig, K. Kawasetsu, A. R. Linshaw, Orbifolds and cosets of minimal W-algebras, Comm. Math. Phys. , 355(1):339–372, 2017

    2017

  3. [11]

    Arakawa, J

    T. Arakawa, J. van Ekeren, Rationality and fusion rules of exceptional W-algebras, J. Eur. Math. Soc. , 25(7):2763–2813, 2023

    2023

  4. [12]

    Arakawa, A

    T. Arakawa, A. Moreau, Joseph ideals and lisse minimal W -algebras, J. Inst. Math. Jussie , 17(2):397– 417, 2018

    2018

  5. [13]

    Creutzig, Tensor categories of weight modules of bsl2 at admissible level, J

    T. Creutzig, Tensor categories of weight modules of bsl2 at admissible level, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 110(6):e70037, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    Creutzig, Resolving Verlinde’s formula of logarithmic CFT, arXiv: 2411.11383 [math.QA]

    T. Creutzig, Resolving Verlinde’s formula of logarithmic CFT, arXiv: 2411.11383 [math.QA]

  7. [15]

    Creutzig, J

    T. Creutzig, J. Frohlich, S. Kanade, Representation theory of Lk(osp(1|2)) from vertex tensor categories and Jacobi forms, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 146(11):4571–4589, 2018

    2018

  8. [16]

    Creutzig, N

    T. Creutzig, N. Genra, A. Linshaw, Ordinary modules for vertex algebras of osp1|2n, J. Reine Angew. Math., 2024(817):1–31, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Creutzig, S

    T. Creutzig, S. Kanade, A. R. Linshaw, Simple current extensions beyond semi-simplicity, Commun. Contemp. Math. , 22(1):1950001, 49, 2020

    2020

  10. [18]

    Creutzig, S

    T. Creutzig, S. Kanade, T. Liu, D. Ridout, Cosets, characters and fusion for admissible-level osp(1|2) minimal models, Nucl. Phys. B , 938:22–55, 2019

    2019

  11. [19]

    Creutzig, S

    T. Creutzig, S. Kanade, R. McRae, Tensor categories for vertex operator superalgebra extensions, Mem. Am. Math. Soc. , 295(1472), 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Creutzig, V

    T. Creutzig, V. Kovalchuk, A. Linshaw, Building blocks for W-algebras of classical types, arXiv: 2409.03465 [math.RT]

  13. [21]

    Creutzig, R

    T. Creutzig, R. McRae, K. Shimizu, H. Yadav, Commutative algebras in Grothendieck-Verdier categories, rigidity, and vertex operator algebras, arXiv: 2409.14618 [math.QA]

  14. [22]

    Creutzig, R

    T. Creutzig, R. McRae, J. Yang, Ribbon categories of weight modules for affine sl2 at admissible levels, arXiv: 2411.11386 [math.QA]

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Creutzig, D

    T. Creutzig, D. Ridout, Inverse coset constructions I: osp1|2 at admissible level, in preparation

  16. [24]

    Creutzig, J

    T. Creutzig, J. Yang, Tensor categories of affine Lie algebras beyond admissible levels, Math. Ann. , 380:1991–2040, 2021

    1991

  17. [25]

    Etingof, D

    P. Etingof, D. Penneys, Rigidity of non-negligible objects of moderate growth in braided categories, arXiv: 2412.17681 [math.QA]

    arXiv

  18. [26]

    Frenkel, Y

    I. Frenkel, Y. Zhu, Vertex operator algebras associated to representations of affine and Virasoro algebras. Duke Math. J. , 66(1):123–168, 1992

    1992

  19. [27]

    Y. Z. Huang, Rigidity and modularity of vertex tensor categories. Commun. Contemp. Math. 10 No.supp01:871–911, 2008

    2008

  20. [28]

    Kac, Infinite dimensional Lie algebras, 3rd ed

    V. Kac, Infinite dimensional Lie algebras, 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, 1990

    1990

  21. [29]

    V. Kac, M. Wakimoto, Modular invariant representations of infinite-dimensional Lie algebras and super- algebras. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA , 85:4956–4960, 1988

    1988

  22. [30]

    V. Kac, M. Wakimoto, Quantum reduction and representation theory of superconformal algebras. Adv. Math., 185(2):400–458, 2004

    2004

  23. [31]

    Kanade, A

    S. Kanade, A. Linshaw, Universal two-parameter even spin W∞-algebra. Adv. Math., 355:106774, 2019

    2019

  24. [32]

    Kawasetsu, W-algebras with non-admissible levels and the Deligne exceptional series, Int

    K. Kawasetsu, W-algebras with non-admissible levels and the Deligne exceptional series, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , 2018(3):641–676, 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    McRae, On rationality for C2-cofinite vertex operator algebras, arXiv: 2108.01898 [math.QA]

    R. McRae, On rationality for C2-cofinite vertex operator algebras, arXiv: 2108.01898 [math.QA]

  26. [34]

    Nakano, F

    H. Nakano, F. O. Hunziker, A. R. Camacho, S. Wood, Fusion rules and rigidity for weight modules over the simple admissible affine sl(2) and N = 2 superconformal vertex operator superalgebras, arXiv: 2411.11387 [math.QA]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    Ridout, J

    D. Ridout, J. Snadden, S. Wood, An admissible level osp(1|2)-model: modular transformations and the Verlinde formula, Lett. Math. Phys. , 108(11):2363–2423, 2018. 13

    2018

  28. [36]

    Wood, Admissible level osp(1|2) minimal models and their relaxed highest weight modules, Transform

    S. Wood, Admissible level osp(1|2) minimal models and their relaxed highest weight modules, Transform. Groups, 25:887–943, 2020. (T.C.) Department Mathematik, FAU Erlangen–N¨urnberg, Cauerstraße 11, 91058, Erlangen, Ger- many Email address : creutzigt@math.fau.de (J.F.) School...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.