Artificial Intelligence for Atmospheric Sciences: A Research Roadmap

Markku Kulmala; Martha Arbayani Zaidan; Naser Hossein Motlagh; Petteri Nurmi; Sasu Tarkoma; Tareq Hussein; Tuukka Pet\"aj\"a

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Artificial Intelligence for Atmospheric Sciences: A Research Roadmap

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Roadmap shows how AI could transform atmospheric science

desk verdict A competent, well-referenced survey-and-roadmap rather than a research contribution; worth serious referee attention, but the quantum-computing claims in Section IV-B-1 are overstated and the roadmap leans on unresolved generalization questions it names but does not answer. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.16281 v1 pith:HFW7O3IE submitted 2025-06-19 cs.ET cs.AI

Martha Arbayani Zaidan , Naser Hossein Motlagh , Petteri Nurmi , Tareq Hussein , Markku Kulmala , Tuukka Petäjä , Sasu Tarkoma This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.ETcs.AI

keywords artificialintelligenceatmosphericsciencesresearchroadmapmachinelearningfoundationmodelsearthsystemmodelingairqualitymonitoringdatainteroperability

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that artificial intelligence is not just an auxiliary tool but a transformative force for atmospheric sciences, and it lays out a research roadmap to unlock that potential. It identifies the main bottlenecks: data interoperability, uneven access to high-performance computing, limited model generalizability across regions and climates, and the black-box nature of many AI models. It surveys AI applications across air quality monitoring, in-situ observations, operational meteorology, satellite remote sensing, and Earth system modeling. The roadmap then proposes priorities spanning self-sustaining sensing infrastructure, a computing continuum from edge devices to HPC and emerging quantum and neuromorphic systems, foundation models and generative AI, physics-informed and explainable methods, and data-to-action feedback loops. If the roadmap is right, environmental monitoring becomes faster, cheaper, and more reliable, while atmospheric data simultaneously pushes AI research toward harder multi-modal generalization problems.

What carries the argument

The central organizing object is the computing continuum: a staged pipeline from low-end sensors to fog and edge nodes, cloud platforms, and HPC, with AI methods applied at each stage, together with a data-governance and interoperability layer. The roadmap also relies on a matched pair of AI methodologies: foundation models and generative models for large-scale forecasting and data synthesis, and physics-informed, explainable, and neurosymbolic methods to keep outputs consistent with physical laws and to build trust in high-stakes decisions.

What would settle it

Run the deep-learning gas-phase chemistry emulator on an operational forecast grid for a full pollution episode and compare wall-clock time and chemical accuracy against the original chemical transport model; if the reported 10.6x/85.2x speedups do not reproduce outside the training setting, the roadmap's core premise that AI can replace expensive CTM components at scale fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the integration of AI into atmospheric sciences has transformative potential, provided the field addresses its data and infrastructure challenges. It argues that the path forward is a full-stack roadmap: self-sustaining and edge-AI sensing networks, a computing continuum spanning HPC, cloud, fog, edge, and emerging quantum, neuromorphic, and DNA-based computing, and advanced AI methods including foundation models, generative models, explainable AI, physics-informed machine learning, and neurosymbolic causal inference. The paper surveys evidence that AI already accelerates parts of the pipeline, citing a deep-learning emulator of chemical transport model solvers with 10.6x speedup on CPU and 85.2x on GPU, improved extreme weather detection, automated cloud classification, ENSO prediction, and learned subgrid parameterizations for climate models. The roadmap's structural move is to treat atmospheric science and AI as mutually beneficial: atmospheric multi-modal data stress AI's generalization limits, while AI gives atmospheric science faster interpretation and prediction. The paper frames the outcome as better forecasting, more efficient monitoring, and informed climate policy.

Load-bearing premise

The roadmap's usefulness depends on atmospheric data from heterogeneous networks being made interoperable and abundant enough to train generalizable AI models, a challenge the paper itself flags.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Air quality models can become cheaper and denser by emulating or replacing chemical transport model solvers, with the paper reporting 10.6x CPU and 85.2x GPU speedups for a gas-phase chemistry solver emulator.
Operational meteorology can move toward hybrid AI-NWP models that keep physics-based constraints while adding data-driven precision, improving nowcasting, ensemble post-processing, and extreme weather detection.
Satellite remote sensing can extract more value from existing data through super-resolution, multi-sensor fusion, and semi-supervised classification, reducing dependence on scarce labeled training data.
Foundation and generative models trained on atmospheric data can produce operational forecasts and probabilistic ensembles, with the paper citing cases that surpass conventional numerical weather prediction methods.
Edge computing and federated learning enable real-time local processing and privacy-preserving training across distributed station networks, supporting data sovereignty while improving latency and scalability.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the roadmap's priorities are adopted, the limiting factor for AI in atmospheric science may shift from model architecture to data stewardship: investment in interoperability standards and shared benchmark datasets could matter more than any single AI method.
A testable extension implied by the roadmap is to use multi-modal atmospheric datasets as stress tests for foundation-model generalization, similar to vision-language benchmarks but with stricter physical consistency requirements.
A concrete experiment suggested by the roadmap is measuring whether physics-informed constraints reduce the amount of labeled data needed to fine-tune foundation models for rare extreme weather events.
The roadmap's computing continuum raises a carbon-accounting question the paper does not quantify: whether distributed edge and neuromorphic processing reduces the net emissions of AI-driven monitoring compared with centralized HPC training and inference.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a solid, broad survey article with a roadmap attached. It contains no new method, dataset, or derivation, and the individual components—foundation models, XAI, federated learning, quantum computing—have all been reviewed elsewhere. What it does offer is a genuinely interdisciplinary synthesis, up-to-date citations (Aurora, GenCast, ClimaX), and a useful mapping of infrastructure, applications, and open challenges. The tables in Sections II and III are practical summaries. Self-citations are used as examples, not as load-bearing evidence, so I do not see a circularity problem.

The main soft spot, and it is real, is Section IV-B-1 on quantum computing. The text says quantum computers have demonstrated successful application in climate modeling and weather prediction, and that NWP on quantum platforms has shown promise in improving forecast accuracy. The cited support is thin—a 2017 speculative paper and several workshop-level or niche-conference items. That is not enough for the word "demonstrated." This section needs substantial hedging or rewriting as a research opportunity. Minor but annoying: Figure 5's caption contains what looks like a production artifact (template words like "Advertising, Screening, Interviewing, Onboarding").

The stress-test concern about generalization is fair but not fatal. The paper itself flags, in Section III-B and III-D, that AI models often struggle to generalize across regions, climates, and novel conditions, and it cites evidence of this. The roadmap then recommends foundation models and generative AI without showing that those address distribution shift. I would have liked an explicit research priority on generalization benchmarks and cross-site validation. Still, a roadmap can legitimately identify hard problems without solving them; the usefulness of this one is in organizing the landscape for people who are new to the field, not in proving that the promised outcomes will materialize.

Who should read it: graduate students, program managers, and researchers from atmospheric science who want a current map of AI methods and infrastructure. It is less useful for AI specialists, who will already know most of the methodology. I would not cite it in my own technical work in the next year, but I would probably send it to a junior colleague as an entry point.

Recommendation: send to peer review. It deserves a serious referee even though it is a review; the overstatement about quantum computing and the figure artifact should be fixed, but the core synthesis is sound and timely.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper is a position/roadmap article that surveys artificial intelligence (AI) applications across atmospheric science domains and proposes a research roadmap. It covers infrastructure (observations, HPC, cloud, fog, edge), application areas (air quality, in-situ monitoring, operational meteorology, satellite remote sensing, Earth system modeling), and emerging technologies (quantum, neuromorphic, DNA, federated learning, foundation models, generative AI, explainable AI, physics-informed ML, neurosymbolic AI, digital twins). The central claim is that AI has transformative potential for atmospheric sciences and that the proposed roadmap—covering data interoperability, computing access, and advanced AI methodologies—will unlock this potential. The paper does not present new empirical results; it is a synthesis with recommendations.

Significance. If its recommendations are sound, the paper could serve as a useful agenda-setting document for interdisciplinary research between AI and atmospheric sciences. Its strengths include a broad and generally consistent reference base (225 references), a clear organizational structure, and explicit acknowledgment of open challenges such as interpretability, data scarcity, and cross-region generalization. The paper also connects real infrastructure networks (SMEAR, ACTRIS, ICOS, GAW, WIGOS) to AI research needs. However, the roadmap is largely qualitative: it lists technologies and challenges without concrete milestones, success metrics, or prioritization, and several assertions about demonstrated performance go beyond what the cited sources support. The paper's value would be substantially increased by addressing these issues.

major comments (4)

[§III-B, §III-D, §IV-C] The roadmap's central promise—that the proposed AI methods will deliver better forecasts and environmental monitoring—rests on the assumption that AI models generalize across geographic regions, climatic conditions, and novel events. The manuscript itself provides evidence that this assumption currently fails: §III-B cites Refs. [61] and [86] for the need to generalize across regions and climatic conditions, and §III-D cites Ref. [114] for models struggling under climate change and extreme events. Yet §IV-C recommends foundation models and generative AI as the path forward without explaining how these mitigate distribution shift, without citing evidence that they do, and without proposing evaluation protocols for out-of-distribution performance. This is a load-bearing gap: if generalization does not improve, the promised outcomes of the roadmap (operational integration, better forecasts, reliable monitoring) do not follow. I recommend adding a concrete research direction on domain adaptation, robust validation, or guarded deployment for distribution shift, or tempering the roadmap's claims accordingly.
[§IV-B1] The claim that 'recent advancements have demonstrated the successful application of quantum computers in climate modeling and weather prediction' is not supported by the cited literature. Refs. [174]–[177] are largely position pieces, conceptual proposals, or feasibility discussions; they do not constitute demonstrations of operational forecast improvement. This is not a side remark: the roadmap's computing-infrastructure section uses this claimed maturity to justify quantum computing as a near-term direction. I recommend rewriting this subsection to distinguish between (a) theoretical promise and small-scale experiments and (b) demonstrated operational skill, and to include concrete, replicable results if any exist.
[§IV-C1, §IV-C2] The descriptions of foundation models and generative AI are too strong for the cited evidence. §IV-C1 states that Microsoft's Aurora has 'demonstrated exceptional performance' without specifying metrics or baselines, and §IV-C2 states that GenCast 'surpasses conventional numerical weather prediction (NWP) methods.' The original papers compare against specific baselines and metrics, and their results are benchmark-dependent, with known limitations such as ensemble reliability and physical consistency. Since these claims motivate the roadmap's recommendation of foundation models and generative AI, they should be qualified with the exact evaluation metrics (e.g., CRPS, RMSE), comparison baselines, and known caveats from Refs. [182] and [183].
[§IV] The paper is framed as a 'detailed research roadmap,' but the roadmap element is largely a list of promising technologies without time-bound objectives, success criteria, or prioritization. For example, §IV.A–§IV.E introduce self-powered sensors, biodegradable sensors, edge AI, CubeSats, quantum/neuromorphic/DNA computing, federated learning, foundation models, generative AI, XAI, PIML, digital twins, and feedback loops, yet none of these subsections states what concrete milestone should be achieved, by what metric, or in what time frame. The paper would be more genuinely useful as a roadmap if it identified a small number of prioritized, testable objectives (e.g., standardized out-of-distribution benchmarks, interoperability milestones for WIGOS/ACTRIS, or energy-efficiency targets for edge/neuromorphic systems) and a mechanism for the community to track progress.

minor comments (5)

[Throughout] There are numerous typos and grammatical errors (e.g., 'atmoshperic' in Section II, 'involves to the direct' in §III-C, 'short future solutions' in §III-H, 'the training ata' in §IV-C2); a careful copyedit is needed.
[§III-H] The sentence 'While possible solutions are limited for short future solutions' is unclear and likely garbled; please rewrite it.
[Figure 5] The figure's caption and surrounding text include unrelated words ('Descibing Advertising Screening Interviewing Onboarding') that appear to be artifacts; the figure text should be cleaned.
[Author block and §II-B] The notation is inconsistent: 'Tarkoma' appears as 'Takoma' in the author block, and 'UAV' appears as 'UA V' or 'UA Vs' in several places; please unify these terms.
[References] References [135] and [149] are the same Bonan and Doney paper; consolidate them to avoid duplication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a roadmap/survey with no derived predictions or fitted parameters, and its self-citations are illustrative rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

This paper does not present a derivation chain: it is an interdisciplinary survey and research roadmap. There are no equations that define a target quantity in terms of the same quantity, no fitted parameters later renamed as predictions, and no uniqueness arguments imported from the authors' prior work. The central claim is a forward-looking argument that AI has transformative potential in atmospheric sciences and that certain infrastructure, data-governance, and AI-methodology directions should be prioritized. That claim is supported by external citations (e.g., numerical weather prediction models, foundation models such as Aurora and GenCast, and chemical transport model emulation results), not by the authors' own fitted outputs. The manuscript does contain several self-citations (e.g., [16], [24], [30], [92], [93], [95], [166], [60]), but they are used as examples of existing applications, definitions, or prior research contexts; none of them is the load-bearing justification for the roadmap's recommendations. The paper explicitly flags unresolved challenges such as model generalization across regions and climates (Sections III-B and III-D) and data interoperability (Section II-C), which are honesty caveats rather than circular moves. The skeptical concern about whether AI models generalize well enough to realize the roadmap is a legitimate correctness risk, but it is not a circularity: the paper's roadmap is not logically equivalent to its inputs, and no claim reduces to a fit or to a self-citation chain. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review, so it contributes no new derivations, fitted parameters, or invented entities. Its roadmap rests on domain-level assumptions about data availability, transferability of AI methods, and the relevance of emerging computing technologies; these assumptions are plausible but not established by the paper itself.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption AI methods that perform well on benchmark data will transfer to operational atmospheric science tasks.
The entire roadmap is predicated on AI utility; the paper cites examples but does not prove transferability, which it itself identifies as an open challenge in Sections III-B and III-D.
domain assumption The listed challenges (data quality, interpretability, compute cost, governance) are the binding constraints on AI adoption.
The roadmap organizes around these challenges; if the real bottleneck is, for example, fundamental predictability limits or a lack of physical understanding, the roadmap could aim at the wrong targets.
domain assumption Emerging computing paradigms (quantum, neuromorphic, DNA) will mature within a relevant timescale.
Section IV-B discusses these technologies as future components of the roadmap; their current applicability to atmospheric science is largely unproven.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Artificial Intelligence for Atmospheric Sciences: A Research Roadmap." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HFW7O3IE

@misc{pith2026250616281,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Artificial Intelligence for Atmospheric Sciences: A Research Roadmap},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HFW7O3IE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.16281}
}

read the original abstract

Atmospheric sciences are crucial for understanding environmental phenomena ranging from air quality to extreme weather events, and climate change. Recent breakthroughs in sensing, communication, computing, and Artificial Intelligence (AI) have significantly advanced atmospheric sciences, enabling the generation of vast amounts of data through long-term Earth observations and providing powerful tools for analyzing atmospheric phenomena and predicting natural disasters. This paper contributes a critical interdisciplinary overview that bridges the fields of atmospheric science and computer science, highlighting the transformative potential of AI in atmospheric research. We identify key challenges associated with integrating AI into atmospheric research, including issues related to big data and infrastructure, and provide a detailed research roadmap that addresses both current and emerging challenges.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.16281 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Examples of the locations of atmospheric observation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Locations of selected High-Performance Computing (HPC) facilities dedicated to weather forecasting (blue) and weather [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (5 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Artificial Intelligence with its prominent subsets [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: The applications of supervised, semi-supervised and unsupervised learning methods in different fields of atmospheric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Accumulated number of Earth observation satellites [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Roadmap of AI-driven solutions and research potentials for atmospheric sciences [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Emerging trends and future research directions in AI for atmospheric science and its related infrastructure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

The Rise of AI in Weather and Climate Information and its Impact on Global Inequality
physics.ao-ph 2026-03 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

AI weather and climate tools inherit Northern-controlled data and compute, risking worse forecasts and maladaptation for the Global South rather than democratizing climate information.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

226 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[61]

Evaluation of low- cost air quality sensor calibration models,

K. Aula, E. Lagerspetz, P. Nurmi, and S. Tarkoma, “Evaluation of low- cost air quality sensor calibration models,” ACM transactions on sensor networks, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1–32, 2022

2022
[86]

An innovative decision making method for air quality monitoring based on big data-assisted artificial intelligence technique,

L. Fu, J. Li, and Y . Chen, “An innovative decision making method for air quality monitoring based on big data-assisted artificial intelligence technique,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge , vol. 8, no. 2, p. 100294, 2023

2023
[114]

How big data can help to monitor the environment and to mitigate risks due to climate change: a review,

J.-P. Montillet, G. Kermarrec, E. Forootan, M. Haberreiter, X. He, W. Finsterle, R. Fernandes, and C. Shum, “How big data can help to monitor the environment and to mitigate risks due to climate change: a review,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine , 2024

2024
[174]

Quantum computing for climate change: A comprehensive review of current applications, challenges, and future directions,

S. Ashwani, A. J. Tripathy, S. Karna, P. R. Jahanve, and S. M. Rajagopal, “Quantum computing for climate change: A comprehensive review of current applications, challenges, and future directions,” in 2024 15th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–7

work page 2024
[177]

Utilizing quantum computing for enhanced natural disaster prediction and mitigation strategies,

R. Y . Patil, Y . H. Patil, and S. Doss, “Utilizing quantum computing for enhanced natural disaster prediction and mitigation strategies,” in The Rise of Quantum Computing in Industry 6.0 Towards Sustainability . Springer, 2024, pp. 141–154

work page 2024
[182]

Aurora: A foundation model of the atmosphere,

C. Bodnar, W. P. Bruinsma, A. Lucic, M. Stanley, J. Brandstetter, P. Garvan, M. Riechert, J. Weyn, H. Dong, A. Vaughan et al. , “Aurora: A foundation model of the atmosphere,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.13063, 2024

arXiv 2024
[183]

Probabilistic weather forecasting with machine learning,

I. Price, A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, F. Alet, T. R. Andersson, A. El-Kadi, D. Masters, T. Ewalds, J. Stott, S. Mohamed, P. Battaglia et al. , “Probabilistic weather forecasting with machine learning,” Nature, pp. 1–7, 2024

work page 2024
[1]

The research priorities of resources and environmental sciences,

B. Fu, Y . Liu, Y . Li, C. Wang, C. Li, W. Jiang, T. Hua, and W. Zhao, “The research priorities of resources and environmental sciences,” Geography and Sustainability , vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2021. 21

2021

Show all 226 references

[2]

A review of the global climate change impacts, adapta- tion, and sustainable mitigation measures,

K. Abbass, M. Z. Qasim, H. Song, M. Murshed, H. Mahmood, and I. Younis, “A review of the global climate change impacts, adapta- tion, and sustainable mitigation measures,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 29, no. 28, pp. 42 539–42 559, 2022

2022
[3]

(2024) Devastating rainfall hits spain: yet another flood-related disaster

World Meteorological Organization (WMO). (2024) Devastating rainfall hits spain: yet another flood-related disaster. Available: https://wmo.int/media/news/devastating-rainfall-hits-spain-yet- another-flood-related-disaster, Accessed: 2025-01-09

2024
[4]

(2024) Copernicus: Second warmest november globally confirms expectation of 2024 as warmest year

Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S). (2024) Copernicus: Second warmest november globally confirms expectation of 2024 as warmest year. Available: https://climate .copernicus.eu/copernicus-second- warmest-november-globally-confirms-expectation-2024-warmest- year, Accessed: ...

2024
[5]

A. C. O’Regan and M. M. Nyhan, “Towards sustainable and net-zero cities: A review of environmental modelling and monitoring tools for optimizing emissions reduction strategies for improved air quality in urban areas,” Environmental Research, vol. 231, p. 116242, 2023

2023
[6]

A scientific perspective on big data in earth observation,

C. Vaduva, M. Iapaolo, and M. Datcu, “A scientific perspective on big data in earth observation,” Principles of Data Science , pp. 155–188, 2020

2020
[7]

Big data in earth science: Emerging practice and promise,

T. C. Vance, T. Huang, and K. A. Butler, “Big data in earth science: Emerging practice and promise,” Science, vol. 383, no. 6688, p. eadh9607, 2024

2024
[8]

Deep learning for processing and analysis of remote sensing big data: A technical review,

X. Zhang, Y . Zhou, and J. Luo, “Deep learning for processing and analysis of remote sensing big data: A technical review,” Big Earth Data, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 527–560, 2022

2022
[9]

Iot and big data applications in smart cities: recent advances, challenges, and critical issues,

M. Talebkhah, A. Sali, M. Marjani, M. Gordan, S. J. Hashim, and F. Z. Rokhani, “Iot and big data applications in smart cities: recent advances, challenges, and critical issues,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 55 465–55 484, 2021

2021
[10]

Big data and iot-based applications in smart environments: A systematic review,

Y . Hajjaji, W. Boulila, I. R. Farah, I. Romdhani, and A. Hussain, “Big data and iot-based applications in smart environments: A systematic review,” Computer Science Review , vol. 39, p. 100318, 2021

2021
[11]

Internet of Things for environmental sustainability and climate change,

A. Salam, “Internet of Things for environmental sustainability and climate change,” in Internet of Things for sustainable community devel- opment: Wireless Communications, Sensing, and Systems . Springer, 2024, pp. 33–69

2024
[12]

Data reliability and fault diagnostic for air quality monitoring station based on low cost sensors and active redundancy,

S. Poupry, K. Medjaher, and C. B ´eler, “Data reliability and fault diagnostic for air quality monitoring station based on low cost sensors and active redundancy,” Measurement, vol. 223, p. 113800, 2023

2023
[13]

Advances in air quality research–current and emerging challenges,

R. S. Sokhi, N. Moussiopoulos, A. Baklanov, J. Bartzis, I. Coll, S. Finardi, R. Friedrich, C. Geels, T. Gr ¨onholm, T. Halenka et al. , “Advances in air quality research–current and emerging challenges,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, vol. 2021, pp. 1–133, 2021

2021
[14]

State of the art: high-performance and high-throughput computing for remote sensing big data,

S. Zhang, Y . Xue, X. Zhou, X. Zhang, W. Liu, K. Li, and R. Liu, “State of the art: high-performance and high-throughput computing for remote sensing big data,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 125–149, 2022

2022
[15]

Toward a collective agenda on AI for earth science data analysis,

D. Tuia, R. Roscher, J. D. Wegner, N. Jacobs, X. Zhu, and G. Camps- Valls, “Toward a collective agenda on AI for earth science data analysis,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine , vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 88–104, 2021

2021
[16]

Dense air quality sensor networks: Validation, analysis, and benefits,

M. A. Zaidan, Y . Xie, N. H. Motlagh, B. Wang, W. Nie, P. Nurmi, S. Tarkoma, T. Pet ¨aj¨a, A. Ding, and M. Kulmala, “Dense air quality sensor networks: Validation, analysis, and benefits,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 22, no. 23, pp. 23 507–23 520, 2022

2022
[17]

From Artificial Intelligence to explainable Artificial intelligence in industry 4.0: a survey on what, how, and where,

I. Ahmed, G. Jeon, and F. Piccialli, “From Artificial Intelligence to explainable Artificial intelligence in industry 4.0: a survey on what, how, and where,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 5031–5042, 2022

2022
[18]

Challenges and benchmark datasets for machine learning in the atmospheric sciences: Definition, status, and outlook,

P. D. Dueben, M. G. Schultz, M. Chantry, D. J. Gagne, D. M. Hall, and A. McGovern, “Challenges and benchmark datasets for machine learning in the atmospheric sciences: Definition, status, and outlook,” Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems , vol. 1, no. 3, p. e210002, 2022

2022
[19]

Opinion: New directions in atmospheric research offered by research infrastructures combined with open and data-intensive science,

A. Petzold, U. Bundke, A. Hienola, P. Laj, C. Lund Myhre, A. Ver- meulen, A. Adamaki, W. Kutsch, V . Thouret, D. Boulanger et al. , “Opinion: New directions in atmospheric research offered by research infrastructures combined with open and data-intensive science,” Atmo- spheri...

2024
[20]

Build a global earth observatory,

M. Kulmala, “Build a global earth observatory,” Nature, vol. 553, no. 7686, pp. 21–23, 2018

2018
[21]

Chapter 9 - A2CI: A cloud-based, service-oriented geospatial cyberinfrastructure to support atmospheric research,

W. Li, H. Shao, S. Wang, X. Zhou, and S. Wu, “Chapter 9 - A2CI: A cloud-based, service-oriented geospatial cyberinfrastructure to support atmospheric research,” in Cloud Computing in Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, T. C. Vance, N. Merati, C. Yang, and M. Yuan, Eds. Academic Pr...

2016
[22]

Atmospheric obser- vations of weather and climate,

H. B. Bluestein, F. H. Carr, and S. J. Goodman, “Atmospheric obser- vations of weather and climate,” Atmosphere-Ocean, vol. 60, no. 3-4, pp. 149–187, 2022

2022
[23]

Station for measuring ecosystem-atmosphere relations: Smear,

P. Hari, E. Nikinmaa, T. Pohja, E. Siivola, J. B ¨ack, T. Vesala, and M. Kulmala, “Station for measuring ecosystem-atmosphere relations: Smear,” Physical and Physiological Forest Ecology, pp. 471–487, 2013

2013
[24]

Intelligent calibration and virtual sensing for integrated low-cost air quality sensors,

M. A. Zaidan, N. H. Motlagh, P. L. Fung, D. Lu, H. Timonen, J. Kuula, J. V . Niemi, S. Tarkoma, T. Pet ¨aj¨a, M. Kulmala, and T. Hussein, “Intelligent calibration and virtual sensing for integrated low-cost air quality sensors,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 20, no. 22, pp. 13 6...

2020
[25]

Aerosol, Clouds and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure (ACTRIS): The European research infrastructure supporting atmospheric science,

P. Laj, C. Lund Myhre, V . Riffault, V . Amiridis, H. Fuchs, K. Eleftheriadis, T. Pet ¨aj¨a, T. Salameh, N. Kivek ¨as, E. Juurola, G. Saponaro, S. Philippin, C. Cornacchia, L. Alados Arboledas, H. Baars, A. Claude, M. De Mazi `ere, B. Dils, M. Dufresne, N. Evangeliou, O. Favez...

2024
[26]

The integrated carbon observation system in Europe,

J. Heiskanen, C. Br ¨ummer, N. Buchmann, C. Calfapietra, H. Chen, B. Gielen, T. Gkritzalis, S. Hammer, S. Hartman, M. Herbst, I. A. Janssens, A. Jordan, E. Juurola, U. Karstens, V . Kasurinen, B. Kruijt, H. Lankreijer, I. Levin, M.-L. Linderson, D. Loustau, L. Merbold, C. L. M...

2022
[27]

A review of space-air-ground integrated remote sensing techniques for atmospheric monitoring,

B. Zhou, S. Zhang, R. Xue, J. Li, and S. Wang, “A review of space-air-ground integrated remote sensing techniques for atmospheric monitoring,” Journal of Environmental Sciences , vol. 123, pp. 3–14, 2023

2023
[28]

An overview of the applications of earth observation satellite data: impacts and future trends,

Q. Zhao, L. Yu, Z. Du, D. Peng, P. Hao, Y . Zhang, and P. Gong, “An overview of the applications of earth observation satellite data: impacts and future trends,” Remote Sensing, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 1863, 2022

2022
[29]

Around the world of IoT/climate monitoring using Internet of X-Things,

N. Saeed, T. Y . Al-Naffouri, and M.-S. Alouini, “Around the world of IoT/climate monitoring using Internet of X-Things,” IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 82–83, 2020

2020
[30]

Irmaset: Intelligent weather forecaster system for hyperlocal renewable energies,

M. A. Zaidan, N. H. Motlagh, B. Zakeri, T. Pet ¨aj¨a, M. Kulmala, and S. Tarkoma, “Irmaset: Intelligent weather forecaster system for hyperlocal renewable energies,” IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 61–74, 2024

2024
[31]

Modular air quality calibration and forecasting method for low-cost sensor nodes,

Y . Hashmy, Z. U. Khan, F. Ilyas, R. Hafiz, U. Younis, and T. Tauqeer, “Modular air quality calibration and forecasting method for low-cost sensor nodes,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 4193–4203, 2023

2023
[32]

N. H. Motlagh, M. A. Zaidan, R. Morabito, P. Nurmi, and S. Tarkoma, Towards Large-Scale IoT Deployments in Smart Cities: Requirements and Challenges. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 105– 129

2024
[33]

Machine learning information fusion in earth observation: A comprehensive review of methods, applications and data sources,

S. Salcedo-Sanz, P. Ghamisi, M. Piles, M. Werner, L. Cuadra, A. Moreno-Mart ´ınez, E. Izquierdo-Verdiguier, J. Mu ˜noz-Mar´ı, A. Mosavi, and G. Camps-Valls, “Machine learning information fusion in earth observation: A comprehensive review of methods, applications and data sour...

2020
[34]

Towards a training data model for artificial intelligence in earth observation,

P. Yue, B. Shangguan, L. Hu, L. Jiang, C. Zhang, Z. Cao, and Y . Pan, “Towards a training data model for artificial intelligence in earth observation,” International Journal of Geographical Information Science, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2113–2137, 2022

2022
[35]

Mod- ern computing: Vision and challenges,

S. S. Gill, H. Wu, P. Patros, C. Ottaviani, P. Arora, V . C. Pujol, D. Haunschild, A. K. Parlikad, O. Cetinkaya, H. Lutfiyya et al., “Mod- ern computing: Vision and challenges,” Telematics and Informatics Reports, p. 100116, 2024. 22

2024
[36]

Destination Earth: High- performance computing for weather and climate,

N. Wedi, P. Bauer, I. Sandu, J. Hoffmann, S. Sheridan, R. Cereceda, T. Quintino, D. Thiemert, and T. Geenen, “Destination Earth: High- performance computing for weather and climate,” Computing in Sci- ence & Engineering , vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 29–37, 2022

2022
[37]

Michalakes, HPC for Weather Forecasting

J. Michalakes, HPC for Weather Forecasting. Springer International Publishing, 2020, p. 297–323

2020
[38]

Accelerating atmospheric chemical kinetics for climate simulations,

M. Alvanos and T. Christoudias, “Accelerating atmospheric chemical kinetics for climate simulations,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 2396–2407, 2019

2019
[39]

A review of operational, regional- scale, chemical weather forecasting models in Europe,

J. Kukkonen, T. Olsson, D. M. Schultz, A. Baklanov, T. Klein, A. I. Miranda, A. Monteiro, M. Hirtl, V . Tarvainen, M. Boy, V .-H. Peuch, A. Poupkou, I. Kioutsioukis, S. Finardi, M. Sofiev, R. Sokhi, K. E. J. Lehtinen, K. Karatzas, R. San Jos ´e, M. Astitha, G. Kallos, M. Schaa...

2012
[40]

Introduction to cloud computing,

W. V oorsluys, J. Broberg, and R. Buyya, “Introduction to cloud computing,” Cloud computing: Principles and Paradigms , pp. 1–41, 2011

2011
[41]

Catch: A cloud-based adaptive data transfer service for hpc,

H. M. Monti, A. R. Butt, and S. S. Vazhkudai, “Catch: A cloud-based adaptive data transfer service for hpc,” in 2011 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, 2011, pp. 1242–1253

2011
[42]

Cloud computing for climate modelling: Evaluation, challenges and benefits,

D. Montes, J. A. A ˜nel, D. C. Wallom, P. Uhe, P. V . Caderno, and T. F. Pena, “Cloud computing for climate modelling: Evaluation, challenges and benefits,” Computers, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 52, 2020

2020
[43]

Google Earth Engine cloud computing platform for remote sensing big data applications: A comprehensive review,

M. Amani, A. Ghorbanian, S. A. Ahmadi, M. Kakooei, A. Moghimi, S. M. Mirmazloumi, S. H. A. Moghaddam, S. Mahdavi, M. Ghahre- manloo, S. Parsian, Q. Wu, and B. Brisco, “Google Earth Engine cloud computing platform for remote sensing big data applications: A comprehensive review...

2020
[44]

Big data and cloud computing: innovation opportunities and challenges,

C. Yang, Q. Huang, Z. Li, K. Liu, and F. Hu, “Big data and cloud computing: innovation opportunities and challenges,” International Journal of Digital Earth , vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 13–53, 2017

2017
[45]

Recent advances in evolving computing paradigms: Cloud, edge, and fog technologies,

N. A. Angel, D. Ravindran, P. D. R. Vincent, K. Srinivasan, and Y .-C. Hu, “Recent advances in evolving computing paradigms: Cloud, edge, and fog technologies,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 196, 2021

2021
[46]

Environmental monitoring based on fog computing paradigm and internet of things,

W. Wang, C. Feng, B. Zhang, and H. Gao, “Environmental monitoring based on fog computing paradigm and internet of things,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 127 154–127 165, 2019

2019
[47]

Edge-computing-driven Internet of Things: A survey,

L. Kong, J. Tan, J. Huang, G. Chen, S. Wang, X. Jin, P. Zeng, M. Khan, and S. K. Das, “Edge-computing-driven Internet of Things: A survey,” ACM Computing Surveys , vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1–41, 2022

2022
[48]

An end-to-end early warning system based on wireless sensor network for gas leakage detection in industrial facilities,

H. A. B. Salameh, M. F. Dhainat, and E. Benkhelifa, “An end-to-end early warning system based on wireless sensor network for gas leakage detection in industrial facilities,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 5135–5143, 2020

2020
[49]

Fire sensing technologies: A review,

A. Gaur, A. Singh, A. Kumar, K. S. Kulkarni, S. Lala, K. Kapoor, V . Srivastava, A. Kumar, and S. C. Mukhopadhyay, “Fire sensing technologies: A review,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 3191–3202, 2019

2019
[50]

An edge and trustworthy AI UA V system with self-adaptivity and hyperspectral imaging for air quality monitoring,

C.-H. Huang, W.-T. Chen, Y .-C. Chang, and K.-T. Wu, “An edge and trustworthy AI UA V system with self-adaptivity and hyperspectral imaging for air quality monitoring,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 11, no. 20, p. 32572–32584, 2024

2024
[51]

Building cross-site and cross- network collaborations in critical zone science,

B. Arora, S. Kuppel, C. Wellen, C. Oswald, J. Groh, D. Payandi- Rolland, J. Stegen, and S. Coffinet, “Building cross-site and cross- network collaborations in critical zone science,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 618, p. 129248, 2023

2023
[52]

Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries,

N. Pandey, H. de Coninck, and A. D. Sagar, “Beyond technology transfer: Innovation cooperation to advance sustainable development in developing countries,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, vol. 11, no. 2, p. e422, 2022

2022
[53]

Assimilation of in-situ observations,

P. M. Pauley and B. Ingleby, “Assimilation of in-situ observations,” Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrologic Applica- tions (Vol. IV), pp. 293–371, 2022

2022
[54]

Ghost: a globally harmonised dataset of surface atmospheric composition measurements,

D. Bowdalo, S. Basart, M. Guevara, O. Jorba, C. P ´erez Garc ´ıa- Pando, M. Jaimes Palomera, O. Rivera Hernandez, M. Puchalski, D. Gay, J. Klausen, S. Moreno, S. Netcheva, and O. Tarasova, “Ghost: a globally harmonised dataset of surface atmospheric composition measurements,” ...

2024
[55]

The copernicus climate change service: climate science in action,

C. Buontempo, S. N. Burgess, D. Dee, B. Pinty, J.-N. Th ´epaut, M. Rixen, S. Almond, D. Armstrong, A. Brookshaw, A. L. Alos, B. Bell, C. Bergeron, C. Cagnazzo, E. Comyn-Platt, E. Damasio-Da- Costa, A. Guillory, H. Hersbach, A. Hor ´anyi, J. Nicolas, A. Obregon, E. P. Ramos, B....

2022
[56]

How machine learning could help to improve climate forecasts,

N. Jones, “How machine learning could help to improve climate forecasts,” Nature, vol. 548, no. 7668, 2017

2017
[57]

How AI is improving climate forecasts,

C. Wong, “How AI is improving climate forecasts,” Nature, vol. 628, pp. 710–712, 2024

2024
[58]

Extreme weather: a large-scale climate dataset for semi-supervised detection, localization, and understanding of extreme weather events,

E. Racah, C. Beckham, T. Maharaj, S. E. Kahou, Prabhat, and C. Pal, “Extreme weather: a large-scale climate dataset for semi-supervised detection, localization, and understanding of extreme weather events,” in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Informa-...

2017
[59]

Lscidmr: Large- scale satellite cloud image database for meteorological research,

C. Bai, M. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Zheng, and S. Chen, “Lscidmr: Large- scale satellite cloud image database for meteorological research,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 12 538–12 550, 2021

2021
[60]

Llms and iot: A comprehensive survey on large language models and the internet of things,

F. Sarhaddi, N. T. Nguyen, A. Zuniga, P. Hui, S. Tarkoma, H. Flores, and P. Nurmi, “Llms and iot: A comprehensive survey on large language models and the internet of things,” Authorea Preprints, 2025

2025
[62]

Hourly rainfall forecast model using supervised learning algorithm,

Q. Zhao, Y . Liu, W. Yao, and Y . Yao, “Hourly rainfall forecast model using supervised learning algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–9, 2021

2021
[63]

Classifying sources influencing indoor air quality (IAQ) using artificial neural network (ANN),

S. M. Saad, A. M. Andrew, A. Y . M. Shakaff, A. R. M. Saad, A. M. Y . . Kamarudin, and A. Zakaria, “Classifying sources influencing indoor air quality (IAQ) using artificial neural network (ANN),” Sensors, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 11 665–11 684, 2015

2015
[64]

Application of K-means and hier- archical clustering techniques for analysis of air pollution: A review (1980–2019),

P. Govender and V . Sivakumar, “Application of K-means and hier- archical clustering techniques for analysis of air pollution: A review (1980–2019),” Atmospheric Pollution Research, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 40– 56, 2020

1980
[65]

Urban air pollution monitoring system with forecasting models,

K. B. Shaban, A. Kadri, and E. Rezk, “Urban air pollution monitoring system with forecasting models,” IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 2598–2606, 2016

2016
[66]

Improving the current air quality index with new particulate indicators using a robust statistical approach,

P. L. Fung, S. Sillanp ¨a¨a, J. V . Niemi, A. Kousa, H. Timonen, M. A. Zaidan, E. Saukko, M. Kulmala, T. Pet ¨aj¨a, and T. Hussein, “Improving the current air quality index with new particulate indicators using a robust statistical approach,” Science of the Total Environment, ...

2022
[67]

How will air quality effects on human health, crops and ecosystems change in the future?

E. V on Schneidemesser, C. Driscoll, H. E. Rieder, and L. D. Schiferl, “How will air quality effects on human health, crops and ecosystems change in the future?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 378, no. 2183, p. 20190330, 2020

2020
[68]

A chronology of global air quality,

D. Fowler, P. Brimblecombe, J. Burrows, M. R. Heal, P. Grennfelt, D. S. Stevenson, A. Jowett, E. Nemitz, M. Coyle, X. Liu et al. , “A chronology of global air quality,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A , vol. 378, no. 2183, p. 20190314, 2020

2020
[69]

Advances in air quality modeling and forecasting,

A. Baklanov and Y . Zhang, “Advances in air quality modeling and forecasting,” Global Transitions, vol. 2, pp. 261–270, 2020

2020
[70]

Sensors and systems for air quality assessment monitoring and management: A review,

D. Singh, M. Dahiya, R. Kumar, and C. Nanda, “Sensors and systems for air quality assessment monitoring and management: A review,” Journal of Environmental Management , vol. 289, p. 112510, 2021

2021
[71]

Application of a chemical transport model and optimized data assimilation methods to improve air quality assessment,

C. Silibello, A. Bolignano, R. Sozzi, and C. Gariazzo, “Application of a chemical transport model and optimized data assimilation methods to improve air quality assessment,” Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health , vol. 7, pp. 283–296, 2014

2014
[72]

Simulation of chemical transport model estimates by means of a neural network using meteo- rological data,

A. Vlasenko, V . Matthias, and U. Callies, “Simulation of chemical transport model estimates by means of a neural network using meteo- rological data,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 254, p. 118236, 2021

2021
[73]

Emulation of an atmospheric gas-phase chemistry solver through deep learning: Case study of Chinese mainland,

C. Liu, H. Zhang, Z. Cheng, J. Shen, J. Zhao, Y . Wang, S. Wang, and Y . Cheng, “Emulation of an atmospheric gas-phase chemistry solver through deep learning: Case study of Chinese mainland,” Atmospheric Pollution Research, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 101079, 2021

2021
[74]

Intelligent modeling strate- gies for forecasting air quality time series: A review,

H. Liu, G. Yan, Z. Duan, and C. Chen, “Intelligent modeling strate- gies for forecasting air quality time series: A review,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 102, p. 106957, 2021

2021
[75]

Prediction of air pollution index (API) using support vector machine (SVM),

W. Leong, R. Kelani, and Z. Ahmad, “Prediction of air pollution index (API) using support vector machine (SVM),” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 103208, 2020

2020
[76]

Spatiotemporal prediction of daily ambient ozone levels across China using random forest for human exposure assessment,

Y . Zhan, Y . Luo, X. Deng, M. L. Grieneisen, M. Zhang, and B. Di, “Spatiotemporal prediction of daily ambient ozone levels across China using random forest for human exposure assessment,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 233, pp. 464–473, 2018. 23

2018
[77]

Air quality forecast using convolutional neural network for sustainable development in urban environments,

R. Chauhan, H. Kaur, and B. Alankar, “Air quality forecast using convolutional neural network for sustainable development in urban environments,” Sustainable Cities and Society , vol. 75, p. 103239, 2021

2021
[78]

Multivariate air quality forecasting with nested long short term memory neural network,

N. Jin, Y . Zeng, K. Yan, and Z. Ji, “Multivariate air quality forecasting with nested long short term memory neural network,” IEEE Transac- tions on Industrial Informatics , vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 8514–8522, 2021

2021
[79]

Semi-supervised air quality forecasting via self-supervised hierarchical graph neural network,

J. Han, H. Liu, H. Xiong, and J. Yang, “Semi-supervised air quality forecasting via self-supervised hierarchical graph neural network,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 5230–5243, 2022

2022
[80]

A framework for identifying distinct multipollutant profiles in air pollution data,

E. Austin, B. Coull, D. Thomas, and P. Koutrakis, “A framework for identifying distinct multipollutant profiles in air pollution data,” Environment International, vol. 45, pp. 112–121, 2012

2012
[81]

An overview of air quality analysis by big data techniques: Monitoring, forecasting, and traceability,

W. Huang, T. Li, J. Liu, P. Xie, S. Du, and F. Teng, “An overview of air quality analysis by big data techniques: Monitoring, forecasting, and traceability,” Information Fusion, vol. 75, pp. 28–40, 2021

2021
[82]

Deep learning based anomaly detection approach for air pollution assessment,

A. Borah, “Deep learning based anomaly detection approach for air pollution assessment,” IEEE Transactions on Big Data , 2024

2024
[83]

Integrating low-cost sensor monitoring, satellite mapping, and geospa- tial artificial intelligence for intra-urban air pollution predictions,

L. Liang, J. Daniels, C. Bailey, L. Hu, R. Phillips, and J. South, “Integrating low-cost sensor monitoring, satellite mapping, and geospa- tial artificial intelligence for intra-urban air pollution predictions,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 331, p. 121832, 2023

2023
[84]

Reviewing explainable artificial in- telligence towards better air quality modelling,

T. Tasioulis and K. Karatzas, “Reviewing explainable artificial in- telligence towards better air quality modelling,” in Environmental Informatics. Springer, 2023, pp. 3–19

2023
[85]

Low-cost outdoor air quality monitoring and sensor calibration: A survey and critical analysis,

F. Concas, J. Mineraud, E. Lagerspetz, S. Varjonen, X. Liu, K. Puo- lam¨aki, P. Nurmi, and S. Tarkoma, “Low-cost outdoor air quality monitoring and sensor calibration: A survey and critical analysis,”ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) , vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–44, 2021

2021
[87]

Ma- chine learning based bias correction for numerical chemical transport models,

M. Xu, J. Jin, G. Wang, A. Segers, T. Deng, and H. X. Lin, “Ma- chine learning based bias correction for numerical chemical transport models,” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 248, p. 118022, 2021

2021
[88]

Networks of atmospheric measuring techniques,

R. Philipona, “Networks of atmospheric measuring techniques,” Springer Handbook of Atmospheric Measurements , pp. 1677–1698, 2021

2021
[89]

Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles,

M. Kulmala, T. Pet ¨aj¨a, T. Nieminen, M. Sipil ¨a, H. E. Manninen, K. Lehtipalo, M. Dal Maso, P. P. Aalto, H. Junninen, P. Paasonen, I. Riipinen, K. E. J. Lehtinen, A. Laaksonen, and V .-M. Kerminen, “Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles,” Nature Pro...

2012
[90]

Direct observations of atmospheric aerosol nucleation,

M. Kulmala, J. Kontkanen, H. Junninen, K. Lehtipalo, H. E. Manninen, T. Nieminen, T. Pet ¨aj¨a, M. Sipil ¨a, S. Schobesberger, P. Rantala, A. Franchin, T. Jokinen, E. J ¨arvinen, M. ¨Aij¨al¨a, J. Kangasluoma, J. Hakala, P. P. Aalto, P. Paasonen, J. Mikkil ¨a, J. Vanhanen, J. A...

2013
[91]

Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, hyyti¨al¨a, finland,

M. Dal Maso, M. Kulmala, I. Riipinen, R. Wagner, T. Hussein, P. P. Aalto, and K. E. Lehtinen, “Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, hyyti¨al¨a, finland,” Boreal Environment Research, vol. 10, no. 5, p....

2005
[92]

Predicting atmospheric particle formation days by bayesian classification of the time series features,

M. Zaidan, V . Haapasilta, R. Relan, H. Junninen, P. Aalto, M. Kulmala, L. Laurson, and A. Foster, “Predicting atmospheric particle formation days by bayesian classification of the time series features,” Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology , vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2018

2018
[93]

New particle formation event detection with Mask R-CNN,

P. Su, J. Joutsensaari, L. Dada, M. A. Zaidan, T. Nieminen, X. Li, Y . Wu, S. Decesari, S. Tarkoma, T. Pet ¨aj¨a, M. Kulmala, and P. Pel- likka, “New particle formation event detection with Mask R-CNN,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1293–1309, 2022

2022
[94]

Unsupervised data driven feature extrac- tion by means of mutual information maximization,

A. Marinoni and P. Gamba, “Unsupervised data driven feature extrac- tion by means of mutual information maximization,” IEEE Transac- tions on Computational Imaging , vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 243–253, 2017

2017
[95]

Exploring non-linear associations between atmospheric new-particle formation and ambient variables: a mutual information approach,

M. A. Zaidan, V . Haapasilta, R. Relan, P. Paasonen, V .-M. Kerminen, H. Junninen, M. Kulmala, and A. S. Foster, “Exploring non-linear associations between atmospheric new-particle formation and ambient variables: a mutual information approach,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physi...

2018
[96]

Exploring non-linear dependencies in atmospheric data with mutual information,

P. Laarne, E. Amnell, M. A. Zaidan, S. Mikkonen, and T. Nieminen, “Exploring non-linear dependencies in atmospheric data with mutual information,” Atmosphere, vol. 13, no. 7, p. 1046, 2022

2022
[97]

Semi-supervised learning for integration of aerosol predictions from multiple satellite instruments,

N. Djuric, L. Kansakar, and S. Vucetic, “Semi-supervised learning for integration of aerosol predictions from multiple satellite instruments,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , ser. IJCAI ’13. AAAI Press, 2013, p. 2797–2803

2013
[98]

A machine learning explainability tutorial for atmospheric sciences,

M. L. Flora, C. K. Potvin, A. McGovern, and S. Handler, “A machine learning explainability tutorial for atmospheric sciences,” Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems , vol. 3, no. 1, p. e230018, 2024

2024
[99]

Kukreja, T

V . Kukreja, T. P. S. Brar, S. Vats, A. Bansal, and R. Sharma, “Advanc- ing climate forecasting accuracy through neurosymbolic integration: Unveiling the neurosymbolic climate inference and prediction (ns-cip) model’s approach to predicting extreme weather events,” SN Computer...

2024
[100]

An assessment of how domain experts evaluate machine learning in operational meteorology,

D. R. Harrison, A. McGovern, C. D. Karstens, A. Bostrom, J. L. Demuth, I. L. Jirak, and P. T. Marsh, “An assessment of how domain experts evaluate machine learning in operational meteorology,”Weather and Forecasting, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 393–410, 2025

2025
[101]

A machine learning model that outperforms conventional global subseasonal forecast models,

L. Chen, X. Zhong, H. Li, J. Wu, B. Lu, D. Chen, S.-P. Xie, L. Wu, Q. Chao, C. Lin et al. , “A machine learning model that outperforms conventional global subseasonal forecast models,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 6425, 2024

2024
[102]

Can deep learning beat numerical weather prediction?

M. G. Schultz, C. Betancourt, B. Gong, F. Kleinert, M. Langguth, L. H. Leufen, A. Mozaffari, and S. Stadtler, “Can deep learning beat numerical weather prediction?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A , vol. 379, no. 2194, p. 20200097, 2021

2021
[103]

Accurate medium-range global weather forecasting with 3d neural networks,

K. Bi, L. Xie, H. Zhang, X. Chen, X. Gu, and Q. Tian, “Accurate medium-range global weather forecasting with 3d neural networks,” Nature, vol. 619, no. 7970, pp. 533–538, 2023

2023
[104]

Status, challenges and trends of data-intensive supercomputing,

J. Wei, M. Chen, L. Wang, P. Ren, Y . Lei, Y . Qu, Q. Jiang, X. Dong, W. Wu, Q. Wang et al., “Status, challenges and trends of data-intensive supercomputing,” CCF Transactions on High Performance Computing, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 211–230, 2022

2022
[105]

Deep learning for twelve hour precipitation forecasts,

L. Espeholt, S. Agrawal, C. Sønderby, M. Kumar, J. Heek, C. Bromberg, C. Gazen, R. Carver, M. Andrychowicz, J. Hickey et al., “Deep learning for twelve hour precipitation forecasts,” Nature communications, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2022

2022
[106]

Deep convolutional network based machine intelligence model for satellite cloud image classification,

K. K. Jena, S. K. Bhoi, S. R. Nayak, R. Panigrahi, and A. K. Bhoi, “Deep convolutional network based machine intelligence model for satellite cloud image classification,” Big Data Mining and Analytics , vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32–43, 2022

2022
[107]

Tropical cyclone intensity estimation from geostationary satellite imagery using deep convolutional neural networks,

C. Wang, G. Zheng, X. Li, Q. Xu, B. Liu, and J. Zhang, “Tropical cyclone intensity estimation from geostationary satellite imagery using deep convolutional neural networks,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–16, 2021

2021
[108]

Short-term weather forecasting using spatial feature attention based lstm model,

M. A. R. Suleman and S. Shridevi, “Short-term weather forecasting using spatial feature attention based lstm model,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 82 456–82 468, 2022

2022
[109]

Deep learning for post-processing ensemble weather forecasts,

P. Gr ¨onquist, C. Yao, T. Ben-Nun, N. Dryden, P. Dueben, S. Li, and T. Hoefler, “Deep learning for post-processing ensemble weather forecasts,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 379, no. 2194, p. 20200092, 2021

2021
[110]

A generative adversarial network approach to (ensemble) weather prediction,

A. Bihlo, “A generative adversarial network approach to (ensemble) weather prediction,” Neural Networks, vol. 139, pp. 1–16, 2021

2021
[111]

Towards nowcasting in europe in 2030,

S. Bojinski, D. Blaauboer, X. Calbet, E. De Coning, F. Debie, T. Mont- merle, V . Nietosvaara, K. Norman, L. Ba˜n´on Peregr´ın, F. Schmid et al., “Towards nowcasting in europe in 2030,” Meteorological applications, vol. 30, no. 4, p. e2124, 2023

2023
[112]

Unsupervised clustering-based short-term solar forecasting,

C. Feng, M. Cui, B.-M. Hodge, S. Lu, H. F. Hamann, and J. Zhang, “Unsupervised clustering-based short-term solar forecasting,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy , vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2174–2185, 2018

2018
[113]

Interpretable machine learning for weather and climate prediction: A review,

R. Yang, J. Hu, Z. Li, J. Mu, T. Yu, J. Xia, X. Li, A. Dasgupta, and H. Xiong, “Interpretable machine learning for weather and climate prediction: A review,” Atmospheric Environment, p. 120797, 2024

2024
[115]

Neural general circulation models for weather and climate,

D. Kochkov, J. Yuval, I. Langmore, P. Norgaard, J. Smith, G. Mooers, M. Kl ¨ower, J. Lottes, S. Rasp, P. D ¨uben et al. , “Neural general circulation models for weather and climate,” Nature, pp. 1–7, 2024. 24

2024
[116]

F. F. Sabins Jr and J. M. Ellis, Remote sensing: Principles, interpreta- tion, and applications . Waveland Press, 2020

2020
[117]

Improving estimates of sulfur, nitrogen, and ozone total deposition through multi-model and measurement-model fusion approaches,

J. S. Fu, G. R. Carmichael, F. Dentener, W. Aas, C. Andersson, L. A. Barrie, A. Cole, C. Galy-Lacaux, J. Geddes, S. Itahashi et al. , “Improving estimates of sulfur, nitrogen, and ozone total deposition through multi-model and measurement-model fusion approaches,” En- vironmen...

2022
[118]

The increasing importance of satellite observations to assess the ocean carbon sink and ocean acidification,

J. D. Shutler, N. Gruber, H. S. Findlay, P. E. Land, L. Gregor, T. Holding, R. P. Sims, H. Green, J.-F. Piolle, B. Chapron et al. , “The increasing importance of satellite observations to assess the ocean carbon sink and ocean acidification,” Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 250, p...

2024
[119]

Assessing sustainable development prospects through remote sensing: A review,

R. Avtar, A. A. Komolafe, A. Kouser, D. Singh, A. P. Yunus, J. Dou, P. Kumar, R. D. Gupta, B. A. Johnson, H. V . T. Minhet al., “Assessing sustainable development prospects through remote sensing: A review,” Remote sensing applications: Society and environment , vol. 20, p. 10...

2020
[120]

Progress and challenges in intelligent remote sensing satellite sys- tems,

B. Zhang, Y . Wu, B. Zhao, J. Chanussot, D. Hong, J. Yao, and L. Gao, “Progress and challenges in intelligent remote sensing satellite sys- tems,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , vol. 15, pp. 1814–1822, 2022

2022
[121]

Artificial intelligence for remote sensing data analysis: A review of challenges and opportunities,

L. Zhang and L. Zhang, “Artificial intelligence for remote sensing data analysis: A review of challenges and opportunities,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine , vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 270–294, 2022

2022
[122]

A survey of machine learning and deep learning in remote sensing of geological environment: Challenges, advances, and opportunities,

W. Han, X. Zhang, Y . Wang, L. Wang, X. Huang, J. Li, S. Wang, W. Chen, X. Li, R. Feng et al. , “A survey of machine learning and deep learning in remote sensing of geological environment: Challenges, advances, and opportunities,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sen...

2023
[123]

Deep learning and earth observation to support the sustainable development goals: Current approaches, open challenges, and future opportunities,

C. Persello, J. D. Wegner, R. H ¨ansch, D. Tuia, P. Ghamisi, M. Ko- eva, and G. Camps-Valls, “Deep learning and earth observation to support the sustainable development goals: Current approaches, open challenges, and future opportunities,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Ma...

2022
[124]

Deep learning for satellite image time-series analysis: A review,

L. Miller, C. Pelletier, and G. I. Webb, “Deep learning for satellite image time-series analysis: A review,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 2024

2024
[125]

Sdfl- fc: Semisupervised deep feature learning with feature consistency for hyperspectral image classification,

Y . Cao, Y . Wang, J. Peng, C. Qiu, L. Ding, and X. X. Zhu, “Sdfl- fc: Semisupervised deep feature learning with feature consistency for hyperspectral image classification,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 10 488–10 502, 2020

2020
[126]

Self-supervised learning in remote sensing: A review,

Y . Wang, C. M. Albrecht, N. A. A. Braham, L. Mou, and X. X. Zhu, “Self-supervised learning in remote sensing: A review,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine , vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 213– 247, 2022

2022
[127]

Unsupervised domain- invariant feature learning for cloud detection of remote sensing im- ages,

J. Guo, J. Yang, H. Yue, X. Liu, and K. Li, “Unsupervised domain- invariant feature learning for cloud detection of remote sensing im- ages,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 60, pp. 1–15, 2021

2021
[128]

A comprehensive review on deep learning based remote sensing image super-resolution methods,

P. Wang, B. Bayram, and E. Sertel, “A comprehensive review on deep learning based remote sensing image super-resolution methods,” Earth- Science Reviews, vol. 232, p. 104110, 2022

2022
[129]

Deep learning for downscaling remote sensing images: Fusion and super-resolution,

M. Sdraka, I. Papoutsis, B. Psomas, K. Vlachos, K. Ioannidis, K. Karantzalos, I. Gialampoukidis, and S. Vrochidis, “Deep learning for downscaling remote sensing images: Fusion and super-resolution,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine , vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 202–255, 2022

2022
[130]

Using artificial intelligence and data fusion for environmental monitoring: A review and future perspectives,

Y . Himeur, B. Rimal, A. Tiwary, and A. Amira, “Using artificial intelligence and data fusion for environmental monitoring: A review and future perspectives,” Information Fusion , vol. 86–87, p. 44–75, Oct. 2022

2022
[131]

Artificial intelligence for geoscience: Progress, challenges, and perspectives,

T. Zhao, S. Wang, C. Ouyang, M. Chen, C. Liu, J. Zhang, L. Yu, F. Wang, Y . Xie, J. Li, F. Wang, S. Grunwald, B. M. Wong, F. Zhang, Z. Qian, Y . Xu, C. Yu, W. Han, T. Sun, Z. Shao, T. Qian, Z. Chen, J. Zeng, H. Zhang, H. Letu, B. Zhang, L. Wang, L. Luo, C. Shi, H. Su, H. Zhang...

2024
[132]

Cloud-based storage and computing for remote sensing big data: a technical review,

C. Xu, X. Du, X. Fan, G. Giuliani, Z. Hu, W. Wang, J. Liu, T. Wang, Z. Yan, J. Zhu et al., “Cloud-based storage and computing for remote sensing big data: a technical review,” International Journal of Digital Earth, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1417–1445, 2022

2022
[133]

There are no data like more data: Datasets for deep learning in earth observation,

M. Schmitt, S. A. Ahmadi, Y . Xu, G. Tas ¸kin, U. Verma, F. Sica, and R. H ¨ansch, “There are no data like more data: Datasets for deep learning in earth observation,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 63–97, 2023

2023
[134]

Trust- worthy remote sensing interpretation: Concepts, technologies, and applications,

S. Wang, W. Han, X. Huang, X. Zhang, L. Wang, and J. Li, “Trust- worthy remote sensing interpretation: Concepts, technologies, and applications,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing , vol. 209, pp. 150–172, 2024

2024
[135]

Climate, ecosystems, and planetary futures: The challenge to predict life in earth system models,

G. B. Bonan and S. C. Doney, “Climate, ecosystems, and planetary futures: The challenge to predict life in earth system models,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6375, Feb. 2018

2018
[136]

The future of earth system prediction: Advances in model-data fusion,

A. Gettelman, A. J. Geer, R. M. Forbes, G. R. Carmichael, G. Feingold, D. J. Posselt, G. L. Stephens, S. C. Van den Heever, A. C. Varble, and P. Zuidema, “The future of earth system prediction: Advances in model-data fusion,” Science Advances , vol. 8, no. 14, p. eabn3488, 2022

2022
[137]

Attribution of climate extreme events,

K. E. Trenberth, J. T. Fasullo, and T. G. Shepherd, “Attribution of climate extreme events,” Nature Climate Change , vol. 5, no. 8, p. 725–730, Jun. 2015

2015
[138]

Recommendations for future research priorities for climate modeling and climate services,

C. D. Hewitt, F. Guglielmo, S. Joussaume, J. Bessembinder, I. Christel, F. J. Doblas-Reyes, V . Djurdjevic, N. Garrett, E. Kjellstr ¨om, A. Krzic, M. M. Costa, and A. L. St. Clair, “Recommendations for future research priorities for climate modeling and climate services,” Bull...

2021
[139]

Towards neural earth system modelling by integrating artificial intelligence in earth system science,

C. Irrgang, N. Boers, M. Sonnewald, E. A. Barnes, C. Kadow, J. Staneva, and J. Saynisch-Wagner, “Towards neural earth system modelling by integrating artificial intelligence in earth system science,” Nature Machine Intelligence , vol. 3, no. 8, p. 667–674, Aug. 2021

2021
[140]

Deep learning and process understand- ing for data-driven earth system science,

M. Reichstein, G. Camps-Valls, B. Stevens, M. Jung, J. Denzler, N. Carvalhais, and F. Prabhat, “Deep learning and process understand- ing for data-driven earth system science,” Nature, vol. 566, no. 7743, pp. 195–204, 2019

2019
[141]

Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models,

S. Rasp, M. S. Pritchard, and P. Gentine, “Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models,” Proceedings of the national academy of sciences , vol. 115, no. 39, pp. 9684–9689, 2018

2018
[142]

Deep learning for multi-year enso forecasts,

Y .-G. Ham, J.-H. Kim, and J.-J. Luo, “Deep learning for multi-year enso forecasts,” Nature, vol. 573, no. 7775, pp. 568–572, 2019

2019
[143]

Atmodist: Self-supervised representation learning for atmospheric dynamics,

S. Hoffmann and C. Lessig, “Atmodist: Self-supervised representation learning for atmospheric dynamics,” Environmental Data Science , vol. 2, p. e6, 2023

2023
[144]

Comparing storm resolving models and climates via unsupervised machine learning,

G. Mooers, M. Pritchard, T. Beucler, P. Srivastava, H. Mangipudi, L. Peng, P. Gentine, and S. Mandt, “Comparing storm resolving models and climates via unsupervised machine learning,” Scientific Reports , vol. 13, no. 1, p. 22365, 2023

2023
[145]

Geospatial big data handling with high performance computing: Current approaches and future directions,

Z. Li, “Geospatial big data handling with high performance computing: Current approaches and future directions,” High Performance Comput- ing for Geospatial Applications , pp. 53–76, 2020

2020
[146]

Exploitation of multiple model layers within lexis weather and climate pilot: An hpc-based approach,

P. Mazzoglio, E. Danovaro, L. Ganne, A. Parodi, S. Hachinger, A. Galizia, A. Parodi, and J. Martinovi ˇc, “Exploitation of multiple model layers within lexis weather and climate pilot: An hpc-based approach,” in HPC, Big Data, and AI Convergence Towards Exascale . CRC Press, 2...

2022
[147]

Assessing physics informed neural networks in ocean modelling and climate change applications,

T. de Wolff, H. Carrillo, L. Mart ´ı, and N. Sanchez-Pi, “Assessing physics informed neural networks in ocean modelling and climate change applications,” in AI: Modeling Oceans and Climate Change Workshop at ICLR 2021 , 2021

2021
[148]

Physics-informed surrogate modeling for supporting climate resilience at groundwater contamination sites,

A. Meray, L. Wang, T. Kurihana, I. Mastilovic, S. Praveen, Z. Xu, M. Memarzadeh, A. Lavin, and H. Wainwright, “Physics-informed surrogate modeling for supporting climate resilience at groundwater contamination sites,” Computers & Geosciences , vol. 183, p. 105508, 2024

2024
[149]

Climate, ecosystems, and planetary futures: The challenge to predict life in earth system models,

G. B. Bonan and S. C. Doney, “Climate, ecosystems, and planetary futures: The challenge to predict life in earth system models,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6375, p. eaam8328, 2018

2018
[150]

Artificial intelligence and early warning systems,

R. Lamsal and T. V . Kumar, “Artificial intelligence and early warning systems,” AI and Robotics in Disaster Studies , pp. 13–32, 2020

2020
[151]

A systematic review of trustworthy artificial intelligence applications in natural disasters,

A. Albahri, Y . L. Khaleel, M. A. Habeeb, R. D. Ismael, Q. A. Hameed, M. Deveci, R. Z. Homod, O. Albahri, A. Alamoodi, and L. Alzubaidi, “A systematic review of trustworthy artificial intelligence applications in natural disasters,” Computers and Electrical Engineering , vol. ...

2024
[152]

Evaluating the performances of several artificial intelligence methods in forecasting daily streamflow time series for sustainable water resources management,

W.-j. Niu and Z.-k. Feng, “Evaluating the performances of several artificial intelligence methods in forecasting daily streamflow time series for sustainable water resources management,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 64, p. 102562, 2021

2021
[153]

Artificial intelligence techniques in hydrology and water resources management,

F.-J. Chang, L.-C. Chang, and J.-F. Chen, “Artificial intelligence techniques in hydrology and water resources management,” p. 1846, 2023. 25

2023
[154]

Machine learning applications for precision agriculture: A comprehensive review,

A. Sharma, A. Jain, P. Gupta, and V . Chowdary, “Machine learning applications for precision agriculture: A comprehensive review,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 4843–4873, 2020

2020
[155]

Particle formation and surface processes on atmospheric aerosols: A review of applied quantum chemical calculations,

A. Leonardi, H. M. Ricker, A. G. Gale, B. T. Ball, T. T. Odbadrakh, G. C. Shields, and J. G. Navea, “Particle formation and surface processes on atmospheric aerosols: A review of applied quantum chemical calculations,” International Journal of Quantum Chemistry , vol. 120, no....

2020
[156]

Self-powered sensors: Ap- plications, challenges, and solutions,

S. Javaid, H. Fahim, S. Zeadally, and B. He, “Self-powered sensors: Ap- plications, challenges, and solutions,” IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 23, no. 18, pp. 20 483–20 509, 2023

2023
[157]

Innovations in self-powered sensors utilizing light, thermal, and mechanical renewable energy,

J. Ahn, S. Cho, L. Wu, X. Li, D. Lee, J.-H. Ha, H. Han, K. Lee, B. Kang, Y . Kwonet al., “Innovations in self-powered sensors utilizing light, thermal, and mechanical renewable energy,” Nano Energy , p. 110045, 2024

2024
[158]

Renewable energy harvesting for wireless sensors using passive rfid tag technology: A review,

R. M. Ferdous, A. W. Reza, and M. F. Siddiqui, “Renewable energy harvesting for wireless sensors using passive rfid tag technology: A review,”Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 58, pp. 1114– 1128, 2016

2016
[159]

F. d. L. L. de Amorim, K. H. Wiltshire, P. Lemke, K. Carstens, S. Peters, J. Rick, L. Gimenez, and M. Scharfe, “Investigation of marine temperature changes across temporal and spatial gradients: providing a fundament for studies on the effects of warming on marine ecosystem fu...

2023
[160]

Supporting sustainable computing by repurposing e-waste smartphones as tiny data centres,

P. Ngoy, F. Dar, M. Liyanage, Z. Yin, U. Norbisrath, A. Zuniga, J. Pestana, M. Radeta, P. Nurmi, and H. Flores, “Supporting sustainable computing by repurposing e-waste smartphones as tiny data centres,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2025

2025
[161]

Printed ecore- sorbable temperature sensors for environmental monitoring,

N. Fumeaux, M. Kossairi, J. Bourely, and D. Briand, “Printed ecore- sorbable temperature sensors for environmental monitoring,”Micro and Nano Engineering, vol. 20, p. 100218, 2023

2023
[162]

Biodegradable and renewable antennas for green iot sensors: A review,

A. Zahedi, R. Liyanapathirana, and K. Thiyagarajan, “Biodegradable and renewable antennas for green iot sensors: A review,” IEEE Access, pp. 1–1, 2024

2024
[163]

Recent progress in nanomaterial enabled chemical sensors for wearable environmental monitoring appli- cations,

M. A. A. Mamun and M. R. Yuce, “Recent progress in nanomaterial enabled chemical sensors for wearable environmental monitoring appli- cations,” Advanced Functional Materials , vol. 30, no. 51, p. 2005703, 2020

2020
[164]

A lightweight hierarchical ai model for uav-enabled edge computing with forest-fire detection use-case,

M. M. Fouda, S. Sakib, Z. M. Fadlullah, N. Nasser, and M. Guizani, “A lightweight hierarchical ai model for uav-enabled edge computing with forest-fire detection use-case,” IEEE Network, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 38–45, 2022

2022
[165]

A trustable federated learning framework for rapid fire smoke detection at the edge in smart home environments,

A. Nikul Patel, G. Srivastava, P. Kumar Reddy Maddikunta, R. Mu- rugan, G. Yenduri, and T. Reddy Gadekallu, “A trustable federated learning framework for rapid fire smoke detection at the edge in smart home environments,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 11, no. 23, pp. ...

2024
[166]

Intel- ligent air pollution sensors calibration for extreme events and drifts monitoring,

M. A. Zaidan, N. H. Motlagh, P. L. Fung, A. S. Khalaf, Y . Matsumi, A. Ding, S. Tarkoma, T. Pet ¨aj¨a, M. Kulmala, and T. Hussein, “Intel- ligent air pollution sensors calibration for extreme events and drifts monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics , vol. 19,...

2023
[167]

Smarter eco- cities and their leading-edge artificial intelligence of things solutions for environmental sustainability: A comprehensive systematic review,

S. E. Bibri, J. Krogstie, A. Kaboli, and A. Alahi, “Smarter eco- cities and their leading-edge artificial intelligence of things solutions for environmental sustainability: A comprehensive systematic review,” Environmental Science and Ecotechnology , vol. 19, p. 100330, 2024

2024
[168]

Antenna designs for cubesats: A review,

S. Abulgasem, F. Tubbal, R. Raad, P. I. Theoharis, S. Lu, and S. Iranmanesh, “Antenna designs for cubesats: A review,”IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 45 289–45 324, 2021

2021
[169]

Cubesat communications: Recent advances and future challenges,

N. Saeed, A. Elzanaty, H. Almorad, H. Dahrouj, T. Y . Al-Naffouri, and M.-S. Alouini, “Cubesat communications: Recent advances and future challenges,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1839–1862, 2020

2020
[170]

Un- derstanding dust sources through remote sensing: Making a case for cubesats,

M. C. Baddock, R. G. Bryant, M. D. Acosta, and T. E. Gill, “Un- derstanding dust sources through remote sensing: Making a case for cubesats,” Journal of Arid Environments , vol. 184, p. 104335, 2021

2021
[171]

Cubesats for future science and internet of space: Challenges and opportunities,

A. Gregorio and F. Alimenti, “Cubesats for future science and internet of space: Challenges and opportunities,” in Proceedings of the IEEE In- ternational Conference on Electronics, Circuits, and Systems (ICECS) , Dec. 2018, pp. 169–172

2018
[172]

Quantum computing review: A decade of research,

S. K. Sood et al., “Quantum computing review: A decade of research,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , vol. 71, pp. 6662– 6676, 2023

2023
[173]

Chal- lenges and opportunities of near-term quantum computing systems,

A. D. C ´orcoles, A. Kandala, A. Javadi-Abhari, D. T. McClure, A. W. Cross, K. Temme, P. D. Nation, M. Steffen, and J. M. Gambetta, “Chal- lenges and opportunities of near-term quantum computing systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE , vol. 108, no. 8, pp. 1338–1352, 2019

2019
[175]

Can a quantum computer be applied for numerical weather prediction?

A. Frolov, “Can a quantum computer be applied for numerical weather prediction?” Russian meteorology and hydrology, vol. 42, pp. 545–553, 2017

2017
[176]

Quantum-improved weather forecasting: Inte- grating quantum machine learning for precise prediction and disaster mitigation,

S. Suhas and S. Divya, “Quantum-improved weather forecasting: Inte- grating quantum machine learning for precise prediction and disaster mitigation,” in 2023 International Conference on Quantum Technolo- gies, Communications, Computing, Hardware and Embedded Systems Security (...

2023
[178]

Qfaas: A serverless function- as-a-service framework for quantum computing,

H. T. Nguyen, M. Usman, and R. Buyya, “Qfaas: A serverless function- as-a-service framework for quantum computing,” Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 154, pp. 281–300, 2024

2024
[179]

Achieving green AI with energy-efficient deep learning using neuromorphic computing,

T. Luo, W.-F. Wong, R. S. M. Goh, A. T. Do, Z. Chen, H. Li, W. Jiang, and W. Yau, “Achieving green AI with energy-efficient deep learning using neuromorphic computing,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 52–57, 2023

2023
[180]

Photonics for neuromorphic computing: Fundamentals, devices, and opportunities,

R. Li, Y . Gong, H. Huang, Y . Zhou, S. Mao, Z. Wei, and Z. Zhang, “Photonics for neuromorphic computing: Fundamentals, devices, and opportunities,” Advanced Materials, vol. n/a, no. n/a, p. 2312825, 2024

2024
[181]

Advancing neuromorphic com- puting with loihi: A survey of results and outlook,

M. Davies, A. Wild, G. Orchard, Y . Sandamirskaya, G. A. F. Guerra, P. Joshi, P. Plank, and S. R. Risbud, “Advancing neuromorphic com- puting with loihi: A survey of results and outlook,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 911–934, 2021

2021
[184]

A resurgence in neuromorphic architectures enabling remote sensing computation,

C. Vineyard, W. Severa, M. Kagie, A. Scholand, and P. Hays, “A resurgence in neuromorphic architectures enabling remote sensing computation,” in 2019 IEEE Space Computing Conference (SCC) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 33–40

2019
[185]

Advancements in on-board processing of synthetic aperture radar (sar) data: enhancing efficiency and real-time capabilities,

L. P. Garcia, G. Furano, M. Ghiglione, V . Zancan, E. Imbembo, C. Ilioudis, C. Clemente, and P. Trucco, “Advancements in on-board processing of synthetic aperture radar (sar) data: enhancing efficiency and real-time capabilities,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Ear...

2024
[186]

Dna-based molecular computing, storage, and communications,

Q. Liu, K. Yang, J. Xie, and Y . Sun, “Dna-based molecular computing, storage, and communications,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 897–915, 2021

2021
[187]

Dna as a universal chemical substrate for computing and data storage,

S. Yang, B. W. B ¨ogels, F. Wang, C. Xu, H. Dou, S. Mann, C. Fan, and T. F. de Greef, “Dna as a universal chemical substrate for computing and data storage,” Nature Reviews Chemistry , vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 179– 194, 2024

2024
[188]

Artificial dna computing-based spectral encoding and matching algorithm for hyperspectral remote sensing data,

H. Jiao, Y . Zhong, and L. Zhang, “Artificial dna computing-based spectral encoding and matching algorithm for hyperspectral remote sensing data,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 4085–4104, 2012

2012
[189]

Decentralized federated learning: Fundamentals, state of the art, frameworks, trends, and challenges,

E. T. M. Beltr ´an, M. Q. P ´erez, P. M. S. S ´anchez, S. L. Bernal, G. Bovet, M. G. P´erez, G. M. P´erez, and A. H. Celdr´an, “Decentralized federated learning: Fundamentals, state of the art, frameworks, trends, and challenges,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , 2023

2023
[190]

Federated learning and crowdsourced weather data: Practice and experience,

C. G. De Vita, G. Mellone, A. Casolaro, M. G. Orsini, J. L. Gonzalez- Compean, and A. Ciaramella, “Federated learning and crowdsourced weather data: Practice and experience,” in 2024 IEEE 20th Interna- tional Conference on e-Science (e-Science) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–9

2024
[191]

Federated learning based atmospheric source term estimation in urban environments,

J. Xu, W. Du, Q. Xu, J. Dong, and B. Wang, “Federated learning based atmospheric source term estimation in urban environments,” Computers & Chemical Engineering , vol. 155, p. 107505, 2021

2021
[192]

Federated learning meets remote sensing,

S. Moreno- ´Alvarez, M. E. Paoletti, A. J. Sanchez-Fernandez, J. A. Rico-Gallego, L. Han, and J. M. Haut, “Federated learning meets remote sensing,” Expert Systems with Applications , p. 124583, 2024. 26

2024
[193]

Can federated learning save the planet?

X. Qiu, T. Parcollet, D. J. Beutel, T. Topal, A. Mathur, and N. D. Lane, “Can federated learning save the planet?” in NeurIPS-Tackling Climate Change with Machine Learning , 2020

2020
[194]

Heterogeneous federated learning: State-of-the-art and research challenges,

M. Ye, X. Fang, B. Du, P. C. Yuen, and D. Tao, “Heterogeneous federated learning: State-of-the-art and research challenges,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1–44, 2023

2023
[195]

A new learning paradigm for foundation model-based remote-sensing change detection,

K. Li, X. Cao, and D. Meng, “A new learning paradigm for foundation model-based remote-sensing change detection,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 62, pp. 1–12, 2024

2024
[196]

SpectralGPT: Spectral remote sensing foun- dation model,

D. Hong, B. Zhang, X. Li, Y . Li, C. Li, J. Yao, N. Yokoya, H. Li, P. Ghamisi, X. Jia et al., “SpectralGPT: Spectral remote sensing foun- dation model,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024

2024
[197]

Geogalactica: A scientific large language model in geoscience,

Z. Lin, C. Deng, L. Zhou, T. Zhang, Y . Xu, Y . Xu, Z. He, Y . Shi, B. Dai, Y . Songet al., “Geogalactica: A scientific large language model in geoscience,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.00434 , 2023

2023 arXiv
[198]

Recent advances in generative ai and large language models: Current status, challenges, and perspectives,

D. H. Hagos, R. Battle, and D. B. Rawat, “Recent advances in generative ai and large language models: Current status, challenges, and perspectives,” IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence , 2024

2024
[199]

Advancements in generative ai: A comprehensive review of gans, gpt, autoencoders, diffusion model, and transformers

S. Bengesi, H. El-Sayed, M. K. Sarker, Y . Houkpati, J. Irungu, and T. Oladunni, “Advancements in generative ai: A comprehensive review of gans, gpt, autoencoders, diffusion model, and transformers.” IEEe Access, 2024

2024
[200]

Explainable ai (xai): Core ideas, techniques, and solutions,

R. Dwivedi, D. Dave, H. Naik, S. Singhal, R. Omer, P. Patel, B. Qian, Z. Wen, T. Shah, G. Morgan et al., “Explainable ai (xai): Core ideas, techniques, and solutions,” ACM Computing Surveys , vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 1–33, 2023

2023
[201]

Under- standing cirrus clouds using explainable machine learning,

K. Jeggle, D. Neubauer, G. Camps-Valls, and U. Lohmann, “Under- standing cirrus clouds using explainable machine learning,” Environ- mental Data Science , vol. 2, p. e19, 2023

2023
[202]

Finding the right XAI method—a guide for the evaluation and ranking of explainable AI methods in climate science,

P. L. Bommer, M. Kretschmer, A. Hedstr ¨om, D. Bareeva, and M. M.- C. H ¨ohne, “Finding the right XAI method—a guide for the evaluation and ranking of explainable AI methods in climate science,” Artificial Intelligence for the Earth Systems , vol. 3, no. 3, p. e230074, 2024

2024
[203]

Machine learning and xai approaches highlight the strong connection between o 3 and no 2 pollutants and alzheimer’s disease,

A. Fania, A. Monaco, N. Amoroso, L. Bellantuono, R. Cazzolla Gatti, N. Firza, A. Lacalamita, E. Pantaleo, S. Tangaro, A. Velichevskaya et al. , “Machine learning and xai approaches highlight the strong connection between o 3 and no 2 pollutants and alzheimer’s disease,” Scient...

2024
[204]

Machine learning and the phys- ical sciences,

G. Carleo, I. Cirac, K. Cranmer, L. Daudet, M. Schuld, N. Tishby, L. V ogt-Maranto, and L. Zdeborov´a, “Machine learning and the phys- ical sciences,” Reviews of Modern Physics , vol. 91, no. 4, p. 045002, 2019

2019
[205]

Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data,

A. Karpatne, G. Atluri, J. H. Faghmous, M. Steinbach, A. Banerjee, A. Ganguly, S. Shekhar, N. Samatova, and V . Kumar, “Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data,” IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering , vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 23...

2017
[206]

Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next,

S. Cuomo, V . S. Di Cola, F. Giampaolo, G. Rozza, M. Raissi, and F. Piccialli, “Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next,” Journal of Scientific Computing, vol. 92, no. 3, p. 88, 2022

2022
[207]

Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling,

K. Kashinath, M. Mustafa, A. Albert, J. Wu, C. Jiang, S. Esmaeilzadeh, K. Azizzadenesheli, R. Wang, A. Chattopadhyay, A. Singh et al. , “Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. ...

2021
[208]

Climax: A foundation model for weather and climate,

T. Nguyen, J. Brandstetter, A. Kapoor, J. K. Gupta, and A. Grover, “Climax: A foundation model for weather and climate,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10343, 2023

2023 arXiv
[209]

Cooking emission control with IoT sensors and connected air quality interventions for smart and healthy homes: Evaluation of effectiveness and energy consumption,

J. Pantelic, Y . J. Son, B. Staven, and Q. Liu, “Cooking emission control with IoT sensors and connected air quality interventions for smart and healthy homes: Evaluation of effectiveness and energy consumption,” Energy and Buildings , vol. 286, p. 112932, 2023

2023
[210]

Enhancing resilience of urban underground space under floods: Current status and future directions,

R. He, R. L. Tiong, Y . Yuan, and L. Zhang, “Enhancing resilience of urban underground space under floods: Current status and future directions,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology , vol. 147, p. 105674, 2024

2024
[211]

Impacts of intelligent transportation systems on energy conservation and emission reduction of transport systems: A comprehensive review,

Z. Lv and W. Shang, “Impacts of intelligent transportation systems on energy conservation and emission reduction of transport systems: A comprehensive review,” Green Technologies and Sustainability, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 100002, 2023

2023
[212]

Data-driven predictive control for smart hvac system in iot-integrated buildings with time-series forecasting and reinforcement learning,

D. Zhuang, V . J. Gan, Z. D. Tekler, A. Chong, S. Tian, and X. Shi, “Data-driven predictive control for smart hvac system in iot-integrated buildings with time-series forecasting and reinforcement learning,” Applied Energy, vol. 338, p. 120936, 2023

2023
[213]

A risk-informed decision-support framework for opti- mal operation of hurricane-impacted transportation networks,

S. Li and T. Wu, “A risk-informed decision-support framework for opti- mal operation of hurricane-impacted transportation networks,” Natural hazards review, vol. 24, no. 3, p. 04023018, 2023

2023
[214]

Digital twins of the earth with and for humans,

W. Hazeleger, J. Aerts, P. Bauer, M. Bierkens, G. Camps-Valls, M. Dekker, F. Doblas-Reyes, V . Eyring, C. Finkenauer, A. Grundner et al., “Digital twins of the earth with and for humans,” Communica- tions Earth & Environment , vol. 5, no. 1, p. 463, 2024

2024
[215]

Earth virtualization engines: a technical perspective,

T. Hoefler, B. Stevens, A. F. Prein, J. Baehr, T. Schulthess, T. F. Stocker, J. Taylor, D. Klocke, P. Manninen, P. M. Forster et al., “Earth virtualization engines: a technical perspective,” Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 50–59, 2023

2023
[216]

Earth virtualization engines (eve),

B. Stevens, S. Adami, T. Ali, H. Anzt, Z. Aslan, S. Attinger, J. B ¨ack, J. Baehr, P. Bauer, N. Bernieret al., “Earth virtualization engines (eve),” Earth System Science Data , vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2113–2122, 2024

2024
[217]

A digital twin of earth for the green transition,

P. Bauer, B. Stevens, and W. Hazeleger, “A digital twin of earth for the green transition,” Nature Climate Change , vol. 11, pp. 80–83, 2021

2021
[218]

Navigating urban complexity: The transformative role of digital twins in smart city development,

D. Peldon, S. Banihashemi, K. LeNguyen, and S. Derrible, “Navigating urban complexity: The transformative role of digital twins in smart city development,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 111, p. 105583, 2024

2024
[219]

Using a game to educate about sustainable development,

G. Senka, M. Tramonti, A. M. Dochshanov, T. Jesmin, J. Terasmaa, H. Tsalapatas, O. Heidmann, M. Caeiro-Rodriguez, and C. Vaz de Carvalho, “Using a game to educate about sustainable development,” Multimodal Technologies and Interaction , vol. 8, no. 11, p. 96, 2024

2024
[220]

Artificial Intelligence regulation: a framework for governance,

P. G. R. de Almeida, C. D. dos Santos, and J. S. Farias, “Artificial Intelligence regulation: a framework for governance,” Ethics and In- formation Technology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 505–525, 2021

2021
[221]

Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence,

M. Janssen, P. Brous, E. Estevez, L. S. Barbosa, and T. Janowski, “Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence,” Government information quarterly , vol. 37, no. 3, p. 101493, 2020

2020
[222]

Artificial intelligence for advanced sustainable development goals: A 360-degree approach,

R. Joshi, K. Pandey, and S. Kumari, “Artificial intelligence for advanced sustainable development goals: A 360-degree approach,” in Preserv- ing Health, Preserving Earth: The Path to Sustainable Healthcare . Springer, 2024, pp. 281–303

2024
[223]

Artificial intelligence-driven sustainable development: Examining organizational, technical, and processing approaches to achieving global goals,

I. Kulkov, J. Kulkova, R. Rohrbeck, L. Menvielle, V . Kaartemo, and H. Makkonen, “Artificial intelligence-driven sustainable development: Examining organizational, technical, and processing approaches to achieving global goals,” Sustainable Development, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 225...

2024
[224]

Connecting the dots in trustworthy artificial intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible ai systems and regulation,

N. D ´ıaz-Rodr´ıguez, J. Del Ser, M. Coeckelbergh, M. L. de Prado, E. Herrera-Viedma, and F. Herrera, “Connecting the dots in trustworthy artificial intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible ai systems and regulation,” Information Fusion, vo...

2023
[225]

Ar- tificial intelligence (ai): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy,

Y . K. Dwivedi, L. Hughes, E. Ismagilova, G. Aarts, C. Coombs, T. Crick, Y . Duan, R. Dwivedi, J. Edwards, A. Eirug et al. , “Ar- tificial intelligence (ai): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy,” In...

2021
[2018]

Previously, he was a Postdoctoral Fellow within the Helsinki Institute for Informa- tion Technology HIIT and Helsinki Center for Data Science (HiDATA)

He is an Academy of Finland Research Fellow at the Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki and at the Nokia Center for Advanced Research (NCAR). Previously, he was a Postdoctoral Fellow within the Helsinki Institute for Informa- tion Technology HIIT and Helsinki...

2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [61]

Evaluation of low- cost air quality sensor calibration models,

K. Aula, E. Lagerspetz, P. Nurmi, and S. Tarkoma, “Evaluation of low- cost air quality sensor calibration models,” ACM transactions on sensor networks, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1–32, 2022

2022

[2] [86]

An innovative decision making method for air quality monitoring based on big data-assisted artificial intelligence technique,

L. Fu, J. Li, and Y . Chen, “An innovative decision making method for air quality monitoring based on big data-assisted artificial intelligence technique,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge , vol. 8, no. 2, p. 100294, 2023

2023

[3] [114]

How big data can help to monitor the environment and to mitigate risks due to climate change: a review,

J.-P. Montillet, G. Kermarrec, E. Forootan, M. Haberreiter, X. He, W. Finsterle, R. Fernandes, and C. Shum, “How big data can help to monitor the environment and to mitigate risks due to climate change: a review,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine , 2024

2024

[4] [174]

Quantum computing for climate change: A comprehensive review of current applications, challenges, and future directions,

S. Ashwani, A. J. Tripathy, S. Karna, P. R. Jahanve, and S. M. Rajagopal, “Quantum computing for climate change: A comprehensive review of current applications, challenges, and future directions,” in 2024 15th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–7

work page 2024

[5] [177]

Utilizing quantum computing for enhanced natural disaster prediction and mitigation strategies,

R. Y . Patil, Y . H. Patil, and S. Doss, “Utilizing quantum computing for enhanced natural disaster prediction and mitigation strategies,” in The Rise of Quantum Computing in Industry 6.0 Towards Sustainability . Springer, 2024, pp. 141–154

work page 2024

[6] [182]

Aurora: A foundation model of the atmosphere,

C. Bodnar, W. P. Bruinsma, A. Lucic, M. Stanley, J. Brandstetter, P. Garvan, M. Riechert, J. Weyn, H. Dong, A. Vaughan et al. , “Aurora: A foundation model of the atmosphere,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.13063, 2024

arXiv 2024

[7] [183]

Probabilistic weather forecasting with machine learning,

I. Price, A. Sanchez-Gonzalez, F. Alet, T. R. Andersson, A. El-Kadi, D. Masters, T. Ewalds, J. Stott, S. Mohamed, P. Battaglia et al. , “Probabilistic weather forecasting with machine learning,” Nature, pp. 1–7, 2024

work page 2024

[8] [1]

The research priorities of resources and environmental sciences,

B. Fu, Y . Liu, Y . Li, C. Wang, C. Li, W. Jiang, T. Hua, and W. Zhao, “The research priorities of resources and environmental sciences,” Geography and Sustainability , vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 87–94, 2021. 21

2021