Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 160 references

The physics, travels, and tribulations of Ronald Wilfrid Gurney

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the overlooked Cavendish physicist Ronald W.

desk verdict A well-sourced archival biography that stands up to scrutiny; the alpha-tunneling priority is handled fairly, and the personal tragedy is honestly framed as one-sided. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17436 v1 pith:ASS5ML3W submitted 2025-06-20 physics.hist-ph cond-mat.otherphysics.chem-phquant-ph

Brian R. Pollard , Saman Alavi This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.hist-phcond-mat.otherphysics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords RonaldW.Gurneyalpha-particletunnelingquantumelectrochemistrylatentimagetheorycolorcentersmodelColdWarsecurityclearancehistoryofmechanics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that Ronald W. Gurney, a Cavendish-trained physicist, should be remembered as a major but overlooked figure who carried quantum-mechanical tunneling from nuclear decay into electrochemistry, solid-state physics, and photographic science. It documents his 1928 alpha-decay tunneling model with Condon, his pioneering quantum treatments of electrode reactions and ionic solutions, the Mott–Gurney theory of color centers and latent images, and the Gurney model for explosive fragments. The paper also reconstructs how Gurney and his wife were caught up in the Klaus Fuchs affair and lost jobs and clearances despite investigations that found no evidence against them. A sympathetic reader would see the paper as a rehabilitation of a 'somewhat forgotten' pioneer whose textbooks spread quantum ideas to non-theorists.

What carries the argument

The carrying scientific mechanism is the idea of quantum-mechanical tunneling through a potential barrier, first quantified by Gurney and Condon in 1928 for alpha particles and then redeployed by Gurney to electron transfer at electrodes, trapped electrons at lattice defects, and the photoelectric formation of latent images. In the biographical argument, the machinery is the archival trail: Natalie Gurney's letters, the Condon papers, Princeton personnel files, and FBI records, which together let the authors reconstruct both the intellectual trajectory and the security case.

What would settle it

A declassified or newly discovered document showing that Gurney or Natalie knowingly passed information to Soviet intelligence would overturn the paper's portrait of them as casualties of unsubstantiated suspicion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that Gurney's career shows a single physical idea—quantum-mechanical tunneling and electron transfer—carried across nuclear, electrochemical, solid-state, and photochemical settings, and that he repeatedly got there first. Specifically, it asserts that Gurney saw that alpha decay could be explained by particles leaking through the Coulomb barrier, built the quantitative model with Condon that reproduced the Geiger–Nuttall law, predicted resonance-enhanced proton capture before it was observed, was the first to put Fermi–Dirac statistics and tunneling into electrolysis, co-authored with Mott the theory of F-centers and the 1938 latent-image mechanism, and created the Gurney model of fragment velocities still used in ballistics. On the biographical side, it claims the security denials and job losses he suffered after 1948 were based on gossip and guilt by association rather than evidence, and that this persecution contributed to his early death.

Load-bearing premise

The account of unfair treatment rests on the reliability of Natalie Gurney's letters and the completeness of the FBI files, which are the chief evidence that the security denials outran what the record showed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Gurney's 1931–1932 electrochemical papers are the first quantum treatment of electrode kinetics, the standard history of electrochemistry should be revised to credit him as a founder of the field.
  • If the 1929 note 'Nuclear Levels and Artificial Disintegration' indeed preceded Gamow and the Fermi group on resonance capture, priority for nuclear resonance absorption belongs at least partly to Gurney.
  • The Mott–Gurney book and the Mott–Gurney law should be counted among the foundational texts of solid-state electronics, which would enlarge Gurney's share of that legacy.
  • If the security narrative is correct, Gurney's case documents how the McCarthy-era loyalty system could ruin even a scientist whom formal review had cleared.
  • Gurney's pedagogical approach—'fitting the psi-curves into the box'—suggests his textbooks remain usable supplements for modern quantum mechanics courses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A systematic citation study could test how often later electrochemistry literature credits Gurney's 1931 papers versus attributing the same ideas to later theorists.
  • The paper implies, but does not develop, that Gurney's serial fellowships reflect a structural failure of interwar academic systems to convert temporary positions into permanent ones; comparing his path with other Cavendish students could support that.
  • One could mine the same declassified FBI files to see whether other cleared scientists still lost their jobs, giving a statistical measure of how typical Gurney's fate was.
  • If the resonance-capture priority claim holds, textbook accounts of the Fermi group's discovery should be qualified by mention of Gurney's earlier qualitative prediction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper reconstructs the life and scientific career of Ronald Wilfrid Gurney (1898–1953), a Cavendish-trained physicist who worked at Princeton, Bristol, Manchester, Stockholm, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Argonne, and several U.S. universities. The authors argue that Gurney made substantial contributions to the quantum theory of alpha-particle tunnelling (with Condon), to quantum mechanical electrochemistry and ionic solutions, to the theory of color centres and photographic latent images (with Mott), to semiconductor physics (including the Mott–Gurney law), and to ballistics (the Gurney model). The paper also tells the story of Gurney's Cold War security troubles, culminating in his loss of employment at the University of Maryland and his early death, and it argues that he and his wife Natalie were treated unjustly by the security system and by some of their academic colleagues. The narrative is based on a wide range of archival sources, including Princeton and Bristol records, Condon's papers, FBI files, and Natalie Gurney's extensive correspondence.

Significance. This is a valuable contribution to the history of twentieth-century physics. Its strengths are the breadth and detail of the archival work, the careful reconstruction of Gurney's publication record, and the balanced presentation of his physics against the wider scientific context of the Cavendish, Princeton, Bristol, and wartime laboratories. The paper makes a credible case that Gurney deserves greater recognition for the Gurney–Condon tunnelling paper, for the early quantum theory of electrode processes, and for the Mott–Gurney work on ionic crystals and the photographic latent image. It also documents a less familiar Cold War casualty story and connects it to the Klaus Fuchs affair with a clear chain of citations to FBI and archival files. The main limitations are interpretive: the priority claims surrounding alpha-tunnelling need more precise framing, and the moral judgment about the Gurneys' treatment rests heavily on one-sided letters and redacted security files. These limitations do not undermine the overall scholarly value, but they do require revision before publication.

major comments (3)
  1. [Princeton and International Travels (1926–1931), pp. 6–7] The priority narrative for alpha-tunnelling is presented in a way that could mislead the reader. The paper states that Gurney and Condon submitted their Nature letter on July 30, 1928, and then says that Gamow 'described his calculations along the same lines in a letter to Nature (submitted on Sept. 29)', adding that Gamow had submitted detailed calculations to Zeitschrift für Physik on July 29. That chronology is acknowledged, but the sentence 'Very soon after, perhaps with a sense of urgency, George Gamow ... described his calculations' implies that Gamow followed the Gurney–Condon work, when in fact Gamow's fuller paper was submitted one day before the Gurney–Condon letter. The phrase 'The Gamow and Gurney-Condon models were the first successful application of quantum mechanics to the atomic nucleus' is also ambiguous. Please revise this passage to state explicitly that the Gurney–Condon claim rests on independent formulation and on the earlier publication of their short note, while Gamow's detailed derivation was submitted first. This is a historiographic weighting, not an error, but it is load-bearing for the abstract's claim about Gurney's significance.
  2. [A tragic ending, p. 31] The concluding judgment that the Gurneys' treatment was 'unforgivable' goes beyond what the cited documents can establish. The paper's evidence for the social ostracism in New York, the Columbia colleagues' avoidance, and the emotional impact on Gurney comes overwhelmingly from Natalie Gurney's letters (for example refs. 133–138), which are inherently one-sided. The FBI files are acknowledged to be redacted, and the paper itself reports that the FBI concluded there was insufficient evidence for a full espionage investigation (p. 28). The sentence 'it is unfortunate and unforgivable that despite numerous detailed investigations, which led to their clearance, the Gurneys could still not disentangle themselves from the web of accusations and suspicion' should be reframed as the authors' interpretation, not a fact established by the documents. Please add a sentence explaining the evidentiary limitations of Natalie's correspondence and of the redacted security files, and soften the moral verdict accordingly.
  3. [Abstract and Return to England, Natalie (1931–1939), pp. 9–10] The abstract states that Gurney 'was the first physicist to apply quantum mechanics to the theory of electrochemistry and ionic solutions'. The paper's support for this strong priority claim consists of a detailed description of Gurney's 1931 paper and a quotation from Bockris, Reddy, and Gamboa-Aldeco calling him 'the first physical electrochemist' (p. 9). Since 'first' is a categorical claim, the paper should either cite a systematic historiographic assessment that explicitly excludes earlier candidates (for example, earlier quantum-mechanical treatments of electrode kinetics or of ionic solutions) or qualify the claim to 'among the first' or 'the first to introduce band theory and tunnelling into electrode kinetics'. Without such a check, the abstract overstates what the cited sources demonstrate.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Introduction, p. 2] The sentence 'it timely to revisit' is missing 'is'; it should read 'it is timely to revisit'.
  2. [Princeton and International Travels, p. 6] The phrase 'an area were R. H. Fowler was working' should be 'an area where R. H. Fowler was working'.
  3. [Return to England, Natalie (1931–1939), p. 9] The word 'Britian' appears in the sentence about the 1938 Nature letter; it should be 'Britain'.
  4. [The War Years and After, p. 20] The sentence 'the president of the Southeast Asia Institute t was' contains a stray 't'; remove it.
  5. [References] The reference list contains two entries numbered [156] and is missing a distinct number for the second one; renumber the references so that each entry has a unique number.
  6. [Figure 5 caption, p. 11] The caption lists 'K. Fuchs as participants'; the grammar should be 'K. Fuchs as participants' or better 'among the participants'.
  7. [Data Availability, p. 34] The statement 'Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study' is inconsistent with the extensive use of archival documents, FBI files, and unpublished letters. For a history paper, the data availability section should describe the archives consulted and any access restrictions, or state that the sources are cited in the references.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the paper is a historical biography grounded in external archival evidence, with no self-referential derivation or fitted-input prediction.

full rationale

This manuscript is a historical biography of Ronald W. Gurney, not a quantitative derivation or empirical prediction paper. The central claims—Gurney's contributions to alpha-tunneling, electrochemistry, photographic latent images, color centers, and ballistics—are supported by citations to Gurney's published papers, contemporary obituaries by Mott and Condon, archival records, FBI files, and oral histories. The paper does not fit parameters to data and then predict a closely related quantity, nor does it define any quantity in terms of a target result. The narrative of Gurney's security troubles relies on primary sources (Natalie Gurney's letters, FBI files, university records), which are external evidence; even if those sources are one-sided, that is an evidentiary limitation, not circularity. The paper explicitly acknowledges uncertainty with 'unless there is further evidence we are currently unaware of,' showing the conclusions are not treated as forced by definition or self-citation. The authors do not cite their own prior work as the basis for any claim. Accordingly, no circular step can be identified, and the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a historical narrative and does not introduce physical entities or fitted parameters. Its main implicit assumption is the reliability of the cited archival materials, which cannot be independently verified from the preprint alone.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The archival sources, including Natalie Gurney's letters and FBI files, are authentic and accurately transcribed.
    The paper's narrative relies on these sources for most personal details and the security-clearance story, especially in the sections on the Fuchs affair and the tragic ending.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The physics, travels, and tribulations of Ronald Wilfrid Gurney." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ASS5ML3W

@misc{pith2026250617436,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The physics, travels, and tribulations of Ronald Wilfrid Gurney},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ASS5ML3W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17436}
}
read the original abstract

Ronald Wilfrid Gurney is one of the lesser-known research students of the Cavendish Laboratory in the mid 1920s. Gurney made significant contributions to the application of quantum mechanics to problems related to tunneling of alpha-particles from nuclei, to formation of images in photographic plates, the understanding of the origin of color-centres in salt crystals, and in the theory of semiconductors. He was the first physicist to apply quantum mechanics to the theory of electrochemistry and ionic solutions. He also made fundamental contributions to ballistics research. Gurney wrote a number of textbooks on fundamental and applied quantum mechanics in a distinctive style which are still useful as educational resources. In addition to his scientific contributions, he travelled extensively, and during and after World War II worked in the United States. During the cold war, he got entangled in the Klaus Fuchs affair and lost his employment. He died at the age of 54 in 1953 from a stroke. With the approach of the 100th year anniversary of quantum mechanics, it is timely to commemorate the life and contributions of this somewhat forgotten physicist.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.17436 by the authors.

Figure 7
Figure 7. The square well potential and the qualitative description of the wave function (a) and probability (b) for the particle in the well. From Ref. (17). At the suggestion of the Physics Department of the University of Bristol, Gurney sent his book to Leningrad State University for translation and publication. As payment, Gurney was offered Russian currency and as this could not be converted, in 1935 he and Natalie used … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Ronald Gurney’s handwritten dedication of his cello – viola duet to Ester Sleator. This letter and the music score were mailed on Mar. 21, 1950, under difficult circumstances for the Gurneys, see below. (Courtesy of Prof. D. Sleator). Based on her interest in international affairs, Natalie became employed in the Southeast Asia Institute in New York City some time in 1943. The president of the Southeast Asia Institut… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

160 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Reminiscences of a Life in and out of Quantum Mechanics

    E. U. Condon , “Reminiscences of a Life in and out of Quantum Mechanics ”, Int. J. Quant. Chem. Symp. 7, 7-22 (1973)

    1973

  2. [2]

    Tunneling – How it Started

    E. U. Condon, “Tunneling – How it Started”, Amer. J. Phys. 46, 319-323 (1978)

    1978

  3. [3]

    Obituary, Dr. R. W. Gurney

    N. F. Mott, “Obituary, Dr. R. W. Gurney” Nature 171, 910 (1953)

    1953

  4. [4]

    Death of Mrs

    Gloucestershire Echo. Death of Mrs. E. C. Gurney. 29 Dec. 1949. Gloucestershire Echo. Gas Death of Local Woman was Accidental. 10 Jan. 1950

    1949

  5. [5]

    Paul Taunton Matthews

    T. W. B. Kibble, “Paul Taunton Matthews”, Biogr. Mem. Fellows Roy. Soc. 34, 554-580 (1987)

    1987

  6. [6]

    Fletcher, in Electrochemical Dictionary, Edited by A

    S. Fletcher, in Electrochemical Dictionary, Edited by A . J. Bard, G. Inzelt, and F . Scholz (Springer, 2008)

    2008

  7. [7]

    Provided by Cheltenham College

    Cheltenham College Application Form, Ronald Wilfrid Gurney, 31 July 1911. Provided by Cheltenham College

    1911

  8. [8]

    Cheltenham College Register 1841-1927, E. S. Skirving Editor, 1928

    1927

Show all 160 references
  1. [9]

    Photo & Link; Honnechy British Cemetery, Nord, France

    Imperial War Museum, Kenneth Gerard Gurney. Photo & Link; Honnechy British Cemetery, Nord, France. Link

  2. [10]

    Kenneth Gurney

    WWI Cheltenham Battlefield Crosses. Kenneth Gurney. Link

  3. [11]

    WO 374 - War Office: Officers' Services, First World War, personal files (alphabetical)

    UK National Archives’ Catalogue. WO 374 - War Office: Officers' Services, First World War, personal files (alphabetical) . 2/Lieutenant Ronald Wilfred GURNEY , The Gloucestershire Regiment. 2 Lieutenant Ronald Wilfred GURNEY , The Gloucestershire Regiment. | The National Archives

  4. [12]

    Princeton University Archives on R. W. Gurney

  5. [13]

    N. Gurney. Biography of Ronald W. Gurney. E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Philo. Soc

  6. [14]

    Reichweitemessungen an α-Strahlen

    H. Geiger, “Reichweitemessungen an α-Strahlen”, Zeit. f. Phys. 8, 45-57 (1921)

    1921

  7. [15]

    The Early History of Quantum Tunneling

    E. Merzbacher, “The Early History of Quantum Tunneling” Phys. Today 55, 44-49 (2002)

    2002

  8. [16]

    Jensen, Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911 – 1934 (Springer, Basel, 2000)

    C. Jensen, Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911 – 1934 (Springer, Basel, 2000)

    1911

  9. [17]

    Rockefeller Foundation Index Card on Ronald W. Gurney. link

  10. [18]

    Stevenson

    G. Stevenson. Gurney, Ronald. The Encyclopedia of Communist Biography. https://grahamstevenson.me.uk/2019/05/24/gurney-ronald/

    2019

  11. [19]

    Klaus Fuchs Part 79 of 111

    FBI Vault. Klaus Fuchs Part 79 of 111. https://vault.fbi.gov/rosenberg-case/klaus-fuchs/klaus- fuchs-part-79-of/view The Life and Physics of Ronald W. Gurney 38

  12. [20]

    Klaus Fuchs Part 84 of 111

    FBI Vault. Klaus Fuchs Part 84 of 111. https://vault.fbi.gov/rosenberg-case/klaus-fuchs/klaus- fuchs-part-84-of/view

  13. [21]

    E. U. Condon. Oral History Interviews. Session III. Interview by Charles Weiner. Niels Bohr Library & Archives, September 11, 1973. link

    1973

  14. [22]

    R. H. Fowler , Statistical Mechanics , the Theory and Properties of Matter in Equilibrium (Cambridge University Press, 1929)

    1929

  15. [23]

    On the Quantum Theory of the Autoelectric Field Currents

    J. R. Oppenheimer “On the Quantum Theory of the Autoelectric Field Currents ”, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci USA 14, 363365 (1928)

    1928

  16. [24]

    Three Notes on the Quantum Theory of Aperiodic Effects

    J. R. Oppenheimer, “Three Notes on the Quantum Theory of Aperiodic Effects ”, Phys. Rev. 13, 66-81 (1928)

    1928

  17. [25]

    Electron Emission in Intense Electric Fields

    R. H. Fowler and L. Nordheim , “Electron Emission in Intense Electric Fields ”, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 119, 173-181 (1928)

    1928

  18. [26]

    The quantum theory of Nuclear Disintegration

    G. Gamow, “The quantum theory of Nuclear Disintegration”, Nature 122, 805-805 (1928)

    1928

  19. [27]

    Zur Quantentheorie des Atomkernes

    G. Gamow, “Zur Quantentheorie des Atomkernes”, Zeit. Phys. 51, 204-212 (1928)

    1928

  20. [28]

    Pais, Niels Bohr’ s Times: In Physics, Philosophy, and Polity (Oxford University Press

    A. Pais, Niels Bohr’ s Times: In Physics, Philosophy, and Polity (Oxford University Press. Oxford, 1994)

    1994

  21. [29]

    Discussion on the Structure of Atomic Nuclei

    E. Rutherford “Discussion on the Structure of Atomic Nuclei ” Proc. Roy. Soc. A. 123, 373- 390 (1929)

    1929

  22. [30]

    Farmelo, The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Mystic of the Atom (Basic Books, New York, 2009)

    G. Farmelo, The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Mystic of the Atom (Basic Books, New York, 2009)

    2009

  23. [31]

    Science 68, 615-618, 1928

    Scientific Notes and News. Science 68, 615-618, 1928

    1928

  24. [32]

    The Boundary of the Solar Chromosphere

    F. J. M. Stratton and C. R. Davidson , “The Boundary of the Solar Chromosphere ”, Nature 123, No. 3096, 318 (1928)

    1928

  25. [33]

    The Boundary of the Solar Chromosphere

    W. H. McCrea, “The Boundary of the Solar Chromosphere”, Nature 123, No. 3101, 527-528 (1928)

    1928

  26. [34]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. June 4, 1953, E. U. Condon Archive, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1953

  27. [35]

    A Conversation with William A. Fowler – Part II

    J. Greenberg, “A Conversation with William A. Fowler – Part II”, Phys. Perspect. 7, 165-203 (2005)

    2005

  28. [36]

    Gamow, The Birth and Death of the Sun (Viking Press, New York, 1940)

    G. Gamow, The Birth and Death of the Sun (Viking Press, New York, 1940)

    1940

  29. [37]

    Azione di Sostanze idrogenate sulla Radioattività provocata da Neutroni. – I,

    E. Fermi, E. Amaldi, B. Pontecorvo, F. Rasetti, and E. Segrè. “Azione di Sostanze idrogenate sulla Radioattività provocata da Neutroni. – I,” Ricerca Scientifica 5, 282–283 (1934); reprinted and translated in Enrico Fermi, Collected Papers (Note e Memorie) Vol. I. Italy 1921 –...

    1934

  30. [38]

    Capture of Slow Neutrons

    G. Breit and E. Wigner, “Capture of Slow Neutrons”, Phys. Rev. 49, 519–531 (1936)

    1936

  31. [39]

    Official files of India employees

  32. [40]

    W. G. Gurney. Former County Alderman. Newspaper clipping

  33. [41]

    The Chemical History of a Current

    K. J. Laidler, “The Chemical History of a Current” Can. J. Chem. 75, 1552-1565 (1997)

    1997

  34. [42]

    J. O’M. Bockris, A. K. N. Reddy, and M. Gamboa -Aldeco. Modern Electrochemistry, V ol. 2A, 2nd Ed., Fundamentals and Electrodics. (Kluwer, New York, 2002)

    2002

  35. [43]

    General Discussion

    R. W. Gurney, “General Discussion” Trans. Faraday Soc. 28, 410-447, (1932)

    1932

  36. [44]

    A Note on the Statistical Theory of the e.m.f. of a reversible Cell and the Verification of the Gibbs-Helmholtz Equation

    R. H. Fowler , “A Note on the Statistical Theory of the e.m.f. of a reversible Cell and the Verification of the Gibbs-Helmholtz Equation”, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 136, 391-396 (1932)

    1932

  37. [45]

    W. L. Bragg letter to F. C. Toy. Royal Institution of Great Britian Archives. link

  38. [46]

    W. L. Bragg. In his own Words. In Crystal Clear: The Autobiographies of Sir Lawrence and Lady Bragg. Edited by A. M. Glazer and P. Thompson (Oxford University Press, 2015)

    2015

  39. [47]

    On Quantum Electrodynamic s

    P. A. M. Dirac, V . A. Fock, and B. Podolski, “On Quantum Electrodynamic s”, Phys. Zeit. Sow. Union 2, 468-479 (1932)

    1932

  40. [48]

    The Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics

    P. A. M. Dirac, “The Lagrangian in Quantum Mechanics. ”, Phys. Zeit. Sow. Union 3, 64-72 (1932)

    1932

  41. [49]

    R. H. Fowler. Report on the theory of semiconductors ”, Phys. Zeit. Sow. Union 2, 507-528, (1932)

    1932

  42. [50]

    A theory of the rotations of molecules in solids and of the dielectric constant of solids and liquids

    R. H. Fowler, “A theory of the rotations of molecules in solids and of the dielectric constant of solids and liquids”, Proc. Roy. Soc. A. 149. 1-28 (1935)

    1935

  43. [51]

    A History of the Department of Physics in Bristol 1876 -1948 with Personal Reminiscences

    A. M. Tyndall, “A History of the Department of Physics in Bristol 1876 -1948 with Personal Reminiscences” (Bristol University, 1956). Link

    1948

  44. [52]

    Gamow, The Thirty Years that Shook Physics (Dover Publications, New York, 1985)

    G. Gamow, The Thirty Years that Shook Physics (Dover Publications, New York, 1985)

    1985

  45. [53]

    Bristol Physics in the 1930s

    N. F. Mott, “Bristol Physics in the 1930s” (Bristol Physics Histories) Link

  46. [54]

    Klaus Fuchs Part 31 of 111

    FBI Vault. Klaus Fuchs Part 31 of 111. https://vault.fbi.gov/rosenberg-case/klaus-fuchs/klaus- fuchs-part-31-of/view

  47. [55]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. May 29, 1941, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1941

  48. [56]

    Klaus Fuchs Part 32 of 111

    FBI Vault. Klaus Fuchs Part 32 of 111. https://vault.fbi.gov/rosenberg-case/klaus-fuchs/klaus- fuchs-part-32-of/view

  49. [57]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. March 10, 1959, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc. The Life and Physics of Ronald W. Gurney 40

    1959

  50. [58]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. January 23, 1950, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1950

  51. [59]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. December 18, 1966, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1966

  52. [60]

    The Progressive League

    Humanist Heritage. The Progressive League. Link

  53. [61]

    R. W. Gurney and N. Kouteinikoff, Marriage Registration, 1934

    1934

  54. [62]

    Natalie Gurney, University of Bristol Record Card

  55. [63]

    N. T. Greenspan, Atomic Spy. The Dark Lives of Klaus Fuchs (Viking, 2020)

    2020

  56. [64]

    Close, Trinity

    F. Close, Trinity. The Treachery and Pursuit of the Most Dangerous Spy in History (Penguin Books, 2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    UK National Archives

    [KV-2-3223] Ronald Hamilton Gunn. UK National Archives. Link

  58. [66]

    UK National Archives

    [KV-2-3224] Ronald Hamilton Gunn. UK National Archives. Link

  59. [67]

    Review: Elementary Quantum Mechanics, by R. W. Gurney

    F. C. Hoyt, “Review: Elementary Quantum Mechanics, by R. W. Gurney”, Astrophys. J. 82, 224 (1935)

    1935

  60. [68]

    Ions in Solution. by R. W. Gurney

    F. H. MacDougall. Review of “Ions in Solution. by R. W. Gurney”. J. Phys. Chem. 41, 766 (1937)

    1937

  61. [69]

    Trans Faraday Soc

    General Discussion. Trans Faraday Soc. 34, 1938

    1938

  62. [70]

    Sixty-ninth General Discussion of the Faraday Society, Sept. 1938. Trans. Faraday Soc. 35, 1-1525 (1939)

    1939

  63. [71]

    Review of Electronic Processes in Ionic Crystals

    L. Pauling , “Review of Electronic Processes in Ionic Crystals ”, J. Phys. Chem. 45, 1142 (1941)

    1941

  64. [72]

    Review of Electronic Processes in Ionic Crystals

    P. A. Leighton, “Review of Electronic Processes in Ionic Crystals ”, J. Chem. Ed. 18, 249 (1941)

    1941

  65. [73]

    Electrons in Ionic Crystals. Review of Electronic Processes in Ionic Crystals 2nd Ed

    H. Fröhlich, “Electrons in Ionic Crystals. Review of Electronic Processes in Ionic Crystals 2nd Ed.” Nature 164, 377 (1948)

    1948

  66. [74]

    E. A. Davies, Editor. Nevill Mott – Reminisces and Appreciations. Taylor & Francis, London, 1998

    1998

  67. [75]

    The Society for Cultural Relations

    “The Society for Cultural Relations”, Nature 154, 141-142 (1944)

    1944

  68. [76]

    [SCRSS] Link

    Society for Cultural Relations, currently known as The Society for Co -operation in Russian and Soviet Studies. [SCRSS] Link

  69. [77]

    Klaus Fuchs Part 34 of 111

    FBI Vault. Klaus Fuchs Part 34 of 111. Link

  70. [78]

    N. Gurney. Western Daily Press. 22 Dec. 1934. The Life and Physics of Ronald W. Gurney 41

    1934

  71. [79]

    Soviet-Sponsored Societies of Friendship and Cultural Relations

    CIA. Soviet-Sponsored Societies of Friendship and Cultural Relations. Oct. 1957. CIA Report RDP78-00915R00080019022-9. Released 2000/08/27

    1957

  72. [80]

    Moss, Klaus Fuchs: The Man Who Stole the Atom Bomb (St

    N. Moss, Klaus Fuchs: The Man Who Stole the Atom Bomb (St. Martin’s Press, New York, 1987)

    1987

  73. [81]

    Gurney Electoral Registers 1938

    N. Gurney Electoral Registers 1938

    1938

  74. [82]

    B. Cannon. The Wenner-Gren Institute for Experimental Biology, Stockholm. In Reality and Myth: A Symposium on Axel Wenner-Gren. Wenner-Gren Center, Stockholm, 2012

    2012

  75. [83]

    Formation of a Research School: Theoretical Solid State Physics at Bristol 1930-54

    S. T. Keith and P. K. Hoch, “Formation of a Research School: Theoretical Solid State Physics at Bristol 1930-54”, Brit. J. His. Sci. 19, 19-44 (1986)

    1986

  76. [84]

    E. U. Condon. Draft manuscript of Tunneling – How it all Started. Niels Bohr Library & Archives

  77. [85]

    British Chemical and Physiological Abstracts, 183, July 1943

    1943

  78. [86]

    R. W. Gurney letter to J. E. Mayer. March 23, 1941, Joseph E. Mayer Archives, University of California San Diego

    1941

  79. [87]

    R. W. Gurney & N. Gurney Entry document to the US at Seattle, 1941; Buffalo, 1945

    1941

  80. [88]

    Gurney Letter to J

    N. Gurney Letter to J. R. Oppenheimer. February 26, 1948, J. Robert Oppenheimer Archives, US Library of Congress

    1948

  81. [89]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. March 6, 1941, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1941

  82. [90]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. March 21, 1941, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1941

  83. [91]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. May 29, 1942, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1942

  84. [92]

    Pauling Letter to Wickman July 1941] Linus Pauling

    L. Pauling Letter to Wickman July 1941] Linus Pauling. Day-by-day. Aug. 1941. Filed under LP Correspondence: Box #140.6, file: (G: Correspondence, 1941)] Link

    1941

  85. [93]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. March 31, 1942, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1942

  86. [94]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. May 6, 1942, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1942

  87. [95]

    Long Island Biological Association, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1942

    Annual Report of the Biological Laboratory. Long Island Biological Association, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1942

    1942

  88. [96]

    Gurney letter to M

    N. Gurney letter to M. Goeppert-Mayer. March 31, 1942 , Joseph E. Mayer Archives, University of California San Diego. The Life and Physics of Ronald W. Gurney 42

    1942

  89. [97]

    R. W. Gurney letter to J. E. Mayer. June 14, 1943, Joseph E. Mayer Archives, University of California San Diego

    1943

  90. [98]

    Ballistic Calculations of R. W. Gurney

    G. E. Jones, J. E. Kenned y, and L. D. Bertholf , “Ballistic Calculations of R. W. Gurney ”, Amer. J. Phys. 48, 264-269 (1980)

    1980

  91. [99]

    The Gurney Model of Explosive Output for Driving Metal

    J. E. Kennedy, “The Gurney Model of Explosive Output for Driving Metal”, In: Zukas, J.A., Walters, W.P. (eds) Explosive Effects and Applic ations. High -Pressure Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, (Springer, New York, NY , 1998). link

    1998

  92. [100]

    An Overview of Gurney Method for Estimating the Initial Velocities of Fragments for High Explosive Munition

    A. Catovic , “An Overview of Gurney Method for Estimating the Initial Velocities of Fragments for High Explosive Munition”, Def. Secur. Stud. 1, 16-25 (2020)

    2020

  93. [101]

    A mathematical m odel for estimating the Gurney velocity of chemical high explosives

    D. Frem , “A mathematical m odel for estimating the Gurney velocity of chemical high explosives”, FirePhysChem 3, 281-291 (2023)

    2023

  94. [102]

    The Legacy of S. Chandrasekhar

    K. C. Wali, “The Legacy of S. Chandrasekhar”, Resonance, April Issue, 19-24 (1997)

    1997

  95. [103]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. May 21, 1956, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1956

  96. [104]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. December 15, 1959, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1959

  97. [105]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. April 24, 1956, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1956

  98. [106]

    Gurney letter to J

    N. Gurney letter to J. R. Oppenheimer. March 10, 1948 , J. Robert Oppenheimer Archives, US Library of Congress

    1948

  99. [107]

    Columbia University Press, New York

    Far East Quarterly , Review of Eastern Asia and the Adjacent Pacific Islands. Columbia University Press, New York

  100. [108]

    Thompson

    N. Thompson. The History of the Department of Physics in Bristol: 1948 to 1988. H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, 1992. Link

    1948

  101. [109]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. October 20, 1946, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1946

  102. [110]

    R. W. Gurney Letter to J. R. Oppenheimer. March 10, 1948 , J. R. Oppenheimer Archives, US Library of Congress

    1948

  103. [111]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. U. Condon and Emily Condon. May 4, 1947, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1947

  104. [112]

    Klaus Fuchs Part 03 of 111

    FBI Vault. Klaus Fuchs Part 03 of 111. Link

  105. [113]

    Klaus Fuchs Part 26 of 111

    FBI Vault. Klaus Fuchs Part 26 of 111. Link

  106. [114]

    Klaus Fuchs Part 91 of 111

    FBI Vault. Klaus Fuchs Part 91 of 111. Link The Life and Physics of Ronald W. Gurney 43

  107. [115]

    Klaus Fuchs Part 106 of 111

    FBI Vault. Klaus Fuchs Part 106 of 111. Link

  108. [116]

    Klaus Fuchs Part 58 of 111

    FBI Vault. Klaus Fuchs Part 58 of 111. Link

  109. [117]

    Klaus Fuchs Part 78 of 111

    FBI Vault. Klaus Fuchs Part 78 of 111. Link

  110. [118]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. May 1, 1947, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1947

  111. [119]

    E. U. Condon letter of recommendation for R . W. Gurney to Brookhaven. May 9, 1947, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1947

  112. [120]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. June 14, 1948, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1948

  113. [121]

    R. W. Gurney letter to J. R. Oppenheimer. June 25, 1948. US Library of Congress Archives

    1948

  114. [122]

    L. Witten. Oral History Interviews. Interview by D. Rickles and D. Salisbury. Niels Bohr Library & Archives, March 17, 2011. Link

    2011

  115. [123]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. October xx, 1948, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1948

  116. [124]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. February 25, 1949, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1949

  117. [125]

    Book Review: Introduction to Statistical Mechanics. Ronald W. Gurney

    D. A. Dennison, “Book Review: Introduction to Statistical Mechanics. Ronald W. Gurney”, Amer. J. Phys. 18, 53-54, (1950)

    1950

  118. [126]

    Review of Introduction to Statistical Mechanics, Ronald W. Gurney

    P. van Rysselberghe, “Review of Introduction to Statistical Mechanics, Ronald W. Gurney”, J. Chem. Ed. 27, 172-173 (1950)

    1950

  119. [127]

    Emil Julius Klaus Fuchs

    [KV-2-1248-2]. Emil Julius Klaus Fuchs. UK National Archives. Link

  120. [128]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. November 29, 1949, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1949

  121. [129]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. January 13, 1950, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1950

  122. [130]

    J. R. Oppenheimer letter to Industrial Employment Relations Board. June 6, 1948. J. R. Oppenheimer Archives, US Library of Congress

    1948

  123. [131]

    Conferring of Degrees At the Close of the Seventy-Fourth Academic Year

    The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. Conferring of Degrees At the Close of the Seventy-Fourth Academic Year. June, 13, 1950

    1950

  124. [132]

    M. L. Goldberger. The Interaction of High Energy Neutrons with Heavy Nuclei. University of Chicago, Ph.D. Thesis. 1948

    1948

  125. [133]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. April 21, 1952, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1952

  126. [134]

    Klaus Fuchs Part 64 of 111

    FBI Vault. Klaus Fuchs Part 64 of 111. Link The Life and Physics of Ronald W. Gurney 44

  127. [135]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. April 22, 1953, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1953

  128. [136]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. April 27, 1953, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1953

  129. [137]

    Harold Urey Part 03 of 11

    FBI Vault. Harold Urey Part 03 of 11. Link

  130. [138]

    Gurney letter to I

    N. Gurney letter to I. I. Rabi. April 21, 1953, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1953

  131. [139]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. April 5, 1953, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1953

  132. [140]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. June 17, 1953, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1953

  133. [141]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. April 16, 1953, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1953

  134. [142]

    Gurney document, E

    N. Gurney document, E. U. Condon Archives, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

  135. [143]

    H. C. Urey, Archives, University of California San Diego

  136. [144]

    E. U. Condon letter to N. Gurney. July 8, 1953, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1953

  137. [145]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. November, 1953, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1953

  138. [146]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. U. Condon. July 2, 1953, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1953

  139. [147]

    New York Times. Dr. R. W. Gurney, 54, Educator, Author. April 15, 1953

    1953

  140. [148]

    New York Herald Tribune. Dr. Gurney Dies, Noted Physicist. April 15, 1953

    1953

  141. [149]

    Nature Obituary, Dr. C. E. M. Joad

    “Nature Obituary, Dr. C. E. M. Joad”, Nature 171, 910-911 (1953)

    1953

  142. [150]

    Obituary Ronald W. Gurney

    “Obituary Ronald W. Gurney”, Phys. Today 6 (June), 26 (1953)

    1953

  143. [151]

    Death Notice, Scientific News and Notes, Science 117, 493-496 (1953)

    1953

  144. [152]

    Review of Ionic Processes in Solution, by Ronald W. Gurney

    S. M. Selis, “Review of Ionic Processes in Solution, by Ronald W. Gurney”, J. Franklin Inst. 256, 588, (1953)

    1953

  145. [153]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. May 9, 1954, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1954

  146. [154]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. May 24, 1955, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1955

  147. [155]

    E. U. Condon and H. Odishaw. Handbook of Physics, 1st Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1958. The Life and Physics of Ronald W. Gurney 45

    1958

  148. [156]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. January 29, 1959, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1959

  149. [157]

    Gurney Marriage certificate to Fredrick Kraupl Taylor, 1958

    N. Gurney Marriage certificate to Fredrick Kraupl Taylor, 1958

    1958

  150. [158]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. November 17, 1958, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1958

  151. [159]

    Gurney letter to E

    N. Gurney letter to E. and E. Condon. November 6, 1961, E. U. Condon Archives, Amer. Phil. Soc

    1961

  152. [160]

    Kramish, The Griffin

    P. Kramish, The Griffin. The Greatest Untold Espionage Story of World War II (Plunkett Lake Press, 2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.