Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Role of non-thermal processes in the quiescent and active millimeter spectrum of a young M dwarf

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read AD Leo's quiet radio glow is up to 7 times too bright to be thermal.

desk verdict Solid first mm SED of a young M dwarf and a novel flare, but the quiescent non-thermal claim doesn't uniquely follow from the 1D thermal baseline. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.19779 v3 pith:CDPOS23P submitted 2025-06-24 astro-ph.SR

Atul Mohan , Peter H. Hauschildt , Birgit Fuhrmeister , Surajit Mondal , Vladimir Airapetian , Sven Wedemeyer This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords ADLeoMdwarfsmillimetercontinuumchromosphericactivitynon-thermalemissionstellarflaressupra-thermalelectronsbrightnesstemperaturespectralindex
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that quiescent millimeter emission from the young M dwarf AD Leo is not purely thermal. Interferometric observations near 94 GHz show a flux density that is 2–7 times higher than the spectrum predicted by a 1D chromospheric model whose temperature structure is constrained by optical and ultraviolet spectroscopy. The authors read this persistent excess, together with a steep mm brightness-temperature spectral index, as evidence of a quasi-steady non-thermal component powered by supra-thermal electrons. They also report an 18-second double-hump flare whose flux density rises with frequency above half-peak, which they attribute to multiple episodes of electron acceleration. If the interpretation holds, the standard assumption that quiescent mm emission in cool stars is chromospheric thermal emission must be relaxed for young, active M dwarfs.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the 1D chromospheric model of AD Leo, a recalculation of an earlier model in which the temperature structure is fixed by fitting optical-UV emission lines and then used to predict the thermal millimeter continuum. Around it sit two diagnostics: the mm brightness-temperature spectral index $\alpha_{mm}$ defined by $T_B(\nu)\propto\nu^{-\alpha_{mm}}$, which measures the chromospheric heating gradient, and the flare spectral index $\delta$ from the ratio of lower-sideband to upper-sideband fluxes. The excess $\Delta S/S_{\rm ch}^{\rm mod}$ between observed and modeled flux is the quantity whose magnitude (up to a factor 7) carries the non-thermal argument.

What would settle it

Measure AD Leo's millimeter spectrum with full Stokes polarization while simultaneously constructing a 3D magnetohydrodynamic model that reproduces its observed surface magnetic field and hot active regions; if that model reproduces the observed $2$–$7\times$ excess and $\alpha_{mm}$ without any supra-thermal electrons, the non-thermal quiescent claim collapses, whereas detection of strong circular polarization or a coherent spectral feature would confirm it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery claim is that the quiescent 82–106 GHz spectrum of AD Leo (a ~250 Myr, M3.5V dwarf) is in excess of the thermal baseline set by a recalibrated 1D chromospheric model: the observed flux densities (155, 123 and 94 µJy at 84.3, 88.2 and 101.7 GHz) exceed the model by factors of roughly 2–7, with a spectral index $\delta = -2.7 \pm 1.3$. The paper argues this excess, which grows toward lower frequencies, cannot be removed by plausible active-region filling factors and implies quasi-steady non-thermal emission from supra-thermal electrons. As a corollary, the mm brightness-temperature spectral index $\alpha_{mm}$ ($T_B(\nu)\propto \nu^{-\alpha_{mm}}$) is about three times larger than the $\alpha_{mm}$–$T_\mathrm{eff}$ scaling law derived for older I-branch stars, while the older M dwarf UV Ceti fits that law. The same data set contains an $\sim18$ s double-hump flare at 86.3 and 101.7 GHz that is frequency-rising above half peak flux, with second-scale variability in Stokes I spectral index, which the authors interpret as evidence of multiple injections of accelerated electrons.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the 1D chromospheric model's temperature structure, fixed by optical-UV lines, being the correct predictor of the thermal millimeter continuum; if surface inhomogeneities or active-region geometry make the true thermal spectrum brighter, the observed excess could be thermal rather than non-thermal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Quiescent mm emission is not a safe thermal chromospheric thermometer for young, rapidly rotating M dwarfs; thermal model fits can understate the required heating unless a non-thermal component is included.
  • The $\alpha_{mm}$–$T_\mathrm{eff}$ scaling from old I-branch stars is not universal; young C-branch stars like AD Leo can deviate by a factor of about 3.
  • Frequency-rising, second-scale, double-hump mm flares are a stellar phenomenon, not just solar: AD Leo joins AU Mic and Proxima Cen with comparable luminosity and duration, but with a frequency-rising signature not seen in those stars.
  • Multiple humps in flare light curves map to multiple injection episodes of accelerated electrons, so mm light curves can resolve particle acceleration timing even without spatially resolved imaging.
  • The SPT95 minutes-long dM flares are likely stronger cousins of the weaker, shorter AU Mic/Proxima Cen/AD Leo events, implying a continuous luminosity-duration relation across dM mm flares.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the non-thermal quiescent interpretation is right, the same supra-thermal electron population should reveal itself in full-Stokes circular polarization or in a spectral turnover at other bands; a simultaneous 34–230 GHz campaign would test this without needing new theory.
  • The paper's own caveat that 1D models cannot capture surface inhomogeneities implies a direct falsification path: a 3D radiative-MHD model with AD Leo's measured surface magnetic fields could shift the inferred thermal baseline enough to absorb the excess.
  • The C/I branch difference suggests $\alpha_{mm}$ may be a proxy for stellar age or rotation, not just $T_\mathrm{eff}$; observing intermediate-age stars like $\epsilon$ Eridani at multiple epochs could map how the scaling law re-establishes itself.
  • The frequency-rising flare threshold (above 50% of peak) hints at an optically thick non-thermal source whose spectrum turns over between 100 and 150 GHz; targeted high-cadence 150/230 GHz follow-up would locate the turnover.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports NOEMA Band-1 (82–106 GHz) observations of the young M3.5V dwarf AD Leo, deriving a quiescent millimeter SED with detections at 84.3, 88.2, and 101.7 GHz. The authors measure a steep spectral index δ = −2.7 ± 1.3 and a brightness-temperature spectral index α_mm that is about three times larger than the extrapolated I-branch scaling law. Comparing the SED with a purely photospheric PHOENIX model and with a UVES-constrained 1D chromospheric model, they find a factor 2–7 excess over the chromospheric model, which they interpret as quasi-steady non-thermal emission powered by supra-thermal electrons. They also report an ~18 s double-hump flare with second-scale spectral-index variability and a frequency-rising behavior above 50% of peak flux, interpreted as multiple injections of accelerated electrons.

Significance. If the non-thermal interpretation is correct, the paper would provide the first evidence that young active M dwarfs host a quasi-steady non-thermal millimeter component, challenging the usual assumption that quiescent cool-star mm emission is purely thermal chromospheric emission. The flare observation is also a rare, well-characterized second-scale mm flare with a frequency-rising spectrum. The data analysis is careful in several respects: explicit imaging reliability criteria, multi-epoch stability checks for quiescence, a high-significance flare detection, and confirmation of variability by phase-only self-calibration. The main risk is that the non-thermal quiescent claim rests on a 1D thermal baseline that is not directly constrained at the heights where the millimeter continuum forms; this needs to be addressed before the central conclusion can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2.2 and §4.1] The inference of quasi-steady non-thermal quiescent emission is not uniquely forced by the data. The thermal baseline S_ch^mod is tied to a 1D temperature structure constrained by Balmer and Fe I lines in UVES data, which form in the lower/middle chromosphere, whereas the 84–102 GHz free-free continuum becomes optically thick in the upper chromosphere/transition region, a height range not directly constrained by those lines. The residual ΔS/S_ch^mod increases toward lower frequencies (Fig. 3b inset), toward the unconstrained layers. The 11% filling-factor test with 7 MK active regions appears to be a uniform rescaling of the model SED rather than a self-consistent radiative-transfer calculation with active-region temperature and density stratification, so it cannot rule out a thermal explanation. The paper's own statement in §3.2.2, "This persistent ΔS/S_ch may imply the limitations of 1D models, that cannot factor in the surface inhomogeneities," is in tension with the abstract's conclusion "This indicates a quasi-steady non-thermal emission." Please either (a) compute a physically motivated active-region contribution and show that it cannot reproduce the excess, or (b) soften the conclusion to an excess over the 1D model and identify observables (polarization, spectral shape, variability) that would test the non-thermal origin.
  2. [§3.1, Table 2, Fig. 2a] The derived spectral index δ = −2.7 ± 1.3 and the subsequent α_mm comparison are sensitive to the weakest detection: the 101.7 GHz point is only a 5σ detection. A robustness test excluding this point should be reported; without it, the reader cannot judge whether the steep spectrum and the factor-3 α_mm deviation are driven by one marginal measurement. In addition, the quoted errors appear to be thermal noise only; systematic uncertainties from amplitude calibration should be quantified and propagated into δ and α_mm.
  3. [§3.1, Fig. 2b] The claim that AD Leo deviates by a factor of 3 from the α_mm–T_eff scaling law relies on extrapolating a relation calibrated on F–K dwarfs from Mohan et al. (2022) down to T_eff ≈ 3500 K, with UV Ceti as a single anchor at 2728 K. This is a long extrapolation and is not an independent test of non-thermal emission. Please quantify the extrapolation uncertainty or explicitly rephrase the result as a deviation from an extrapolated I-branch trend rather than from an established scaling law.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence "The flare resemble certain solar events" should read "The flare resembles certain solar events."
  2. [Table 1] The header "T able 1" has a stray space and should be "Table 1."
  3. [§2.1] The range written as "10 3 - 10 6 GHz" should be formatted as 10^3–10^6 GHz.
  4. [Fig. 2a] The downward arrow denoting the 104 GHz upper limit is not explained in the caption or the text; please clarify whether this is a non-detection from the upper sideband.
  5. [Fig. 4] Please add explicit error bars or shaded uncertainty bands to the spectral-index time series in panel (c), and specify the time averaging used for the displayed points.
  6. [§4.1] The phrase "strongly suggest the need to incorporate non-thermal emission mechanisms" is stronger than the model-comparison evidence presented; consider aligning it with the revised, more cautious conclusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the NOEMA mm data are compared against an independently UVES-constrained 1D PHOENIX model and an external scaling-law benchmark, with no fitted input renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that quiescent 84-106 GHz emission from AD Leo exceeds the thermal flux predicted by a 1D PHOENIX chromospheric model. The model (Sec. 3.2.2) is a recalculation of Fuhrmeister et al. (2005), with the temperature structure inferred from UVES Balmer and Fe I lines; the NOEMA fluxes were not used in constructing or fitting this model. The mm flux is therefore a genuine prediction of the thermal baseline, not an output of a fit to the same data. The alpha_mm-Teff scaling law from Mohan et al. (2022) is cited as a benchmark, but AD Leo was not in the F-K I-branch sample used to derive it, and UV Ceti is checked with independent 34/98 GHz data from Plant et al. (2024). The paper explicitly concedes that 1D-model limitations or surface inhomogeneities could explain part of the excess (Sec. 3.2.2: 'This persistent ∆S/S_ch may imply the limitations of 1D models'), which is a modeling-uncertainty caveat rather than a circular reduction. No equation defines the predicted mm SED in terms of the observed mm SED, and no parameter fitted to the mm data is later presented as a prediction. The self-citations are to prior compilations and a scaling law that are externally falsifiable and not fitted to the target observations. Hence no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim of a non-thermal excess does not rely on any newly fitted constants; the key free choices are the active region filling factor and the flare region size, both taken from prior literature and used only in supporting tests. The dominant assumption is the fidelity of the 1D chromospheric model in the millimeter band, which the authors themselves flag as uncertain.

free parameters (2)
  • Active region filling factor = 11%
    Assumed in Sec. 3.2.2 to test whether a hotter (7 MK) active region could raise the thermal model to match the mm data. The excess persists regardless, so this parameter does not drive the central conclusion.
  • Flare region fractional size f = ~1%
    Used in Sec. 4.2 to estimate T_B ~ 1e9 K from the flare luminosity. Based on optical flare size studies, not fitted here. This is a supporting constraint for the non-thermal interpretation of the flare, not for the quiescent excess.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The 1D PHOENIX chromospheric model with temperature structure from Fuhrmeister et al. (2005) correctly predicts the thermal mm continuum of AD Leo.
    Sec. 3.2.2 uses S_ch(ν) as the thermal baseline. If this model underpredicts thermal mm emission, the inferred non-thermal excess is spurious. The paper acknowledges this possibility.
  • domain assumption The α_mm-T_eff scaling law of Mohan et al. (2022) for old F-K stars is a valid reference for M dwarfs at the same T_eff.
    Used in Sec. 3.1 to place AD Leo. UV Ceti's consistency provides empirical support, but the applicability to young, fully convective dMs is the very question under test.
  • domain assumption Quiescent emission is steady across all non-flaring epochs, so combining them yields a representative spectrum.
    Sec. 3.1 states the flux is steady within errors; Table 2 shows consistency across the three epoch groups, but the full time sampling is not displayed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Role of non-thermal processes in the quiescent and active millimeter spectrum of a young M dwarf." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CDPOS23P

@misc{pith2026250619779,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Role of non-thermal processes in the quiescent and active millimeter spectrum of a young M dwarf},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CDPOS23P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.19779}
}
abstract

Millimeter (mm) emission from F - M dwarfs (cool stars) primarily traces chromospheric activity, with thermal emission thought to dominate in quiescence. Despite the high chromospheric activity, the quiescent mm spectral fluence (mm-S($\nu$)) of young (< 1 Gyr) M dwarfs (dMs) remain largely unexplored. We present the quiescent mm-S($\nu$) of a young dM, ADLeo, observed around 94 GHz using the Northern Extended Millimetre Array (NOEMA). The observed quiescent mm-S($\nu$) exceeds the thermal flux density from a 1D chromospheric model, constrained by optical-UV spectroscopic data, by up to a factor of 7. This indicates a quasi-steady non-thermal emission powered by supra-thermal electrons unlike in old (> 1 Gyr) cool stars, whose quiescent mm-S($\nu$) generally agree with 1D thermal models. The mm-brightness temperature spectral index ($\alpha_{mm}$; $T_B(\nu)\propto \nu^{- \alpha_{mm}}$) of AD Leo deviates by a factor of 3 from the $\alpha_{mm}$ - $T_{eff}$ scaling law for old sun-like stars (Mohan, A., et al., 2022), while UV Ceti, an older M6V star, follows the trend. Also, we report a double-hump flare with second-scale variability in flux density and spectral index, and a frequency-rising nature with brightness increasing with frequency. The flare resemble certain solar events, but is unlike the second-scale events reported in dMs. The non-thermal flare humps suggest multiple injections of accelerated electrons. The mean flare luminosity (2 - 5 $\times 10^{15} erg s^{-1} Hz^{-1}$) and duration ($18\pm 2$ s) are comparable to flares reported in AU Mic and Proxima Cen, but 100 - 1000 times weaker than the minutes-long dM flares observed by the South Pole Telescope.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.19779 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Collage of sample images. Left: Stokes I quiescent images generated by averaging the entire non-flaring period. Right: Images during the peak flare time, 2023-07-14 14:51:05 UT, in the two polarizations and Stokes I. Positive and negative contours are shown at -0.8, -0.6, -0.4, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 times the peak flux in all images. Image center: J2000 10h19m35.4s +19d52m11.1s. 85 90 95 100 105 Frequency (GHz) 0.06 0.0… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a): The mm-S(ν) with the power-law model. The flux density upper limit at 104 GHz is marked by a downward arrow. (b): The αmm–Teff relation for the sample from Mohan et al. (2021), including data points for AD Leo and UV Ceti. The scaling law from Mohan et al. (2022) is overlaid, with the shaded region representing uncertainties due to estimation errors in the model parameters. correspond to different stellar rotat… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. compares S(ν) with the purely photospheric model, Sph mod(ν), and Sch mod(ν) which features a spectroscopic data-constrained chromosphere. The bottom panels of the sub-figures show the deviation of S(ν) from the respective models (∆S/S ph mod= S(ν)/Sph mod(ν)-1; ∆S/S ch mod= S(ν)/Sch mod(ν)-1) The dotted line at ∆S/S ph mod =0 (∆S/S ch mod =0) marks the perfect match condition between the model and the data. The ins… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Double-hump flare profile in LSB and USB.(a-b): Band-averaged H and V polarization light curves showing polarization variability. (c): Stokes I flux density and spectral index (δ; in dots) evolution. (d) Comparison of the AD Leo flare δ and L95GHz with the SPT95 sample…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Study of Quasi-Periodic Pulsations in Solar and Stellar Flares with SKA

    astro-ph.SR 2026-07 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    SKA’s radio imaging spectroscopy and polarisation will enable decisive tests of QPP mechanisms in solar and stellar flares, including weak events and solar–stellar comparisons.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  4. [4]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  5. [5]

    "* VlX EGo7 se rr&937L = ` = ` = ` = ` = ` = ` = ` = ` = ` = ` = ` = ` 6P=ze = Ȫ bO>`ȑ# 857f 6oܰaC uF>7|&1 7Xf 쁬z ^ 5 ܴiSN1ʜ ڂ *U Y& Z* D q# 4I

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  6. [6]

    S., Barnes , R., Cohen , O., et al

    Airapetian , V. S., Barnes , R., Cohen , O., et al. 2020, International Journal of Astrobiology, 19, 136, 10.1017/S1473550419000132

    doi:10.1017/s1473550419000132 2020

  7. [7]

    2020, , 492, 572, 10.1093/mnras/stz3361

    Ansdell, M., Gaidos, E., Hedges, C., et al. 2020, , 492, 572, 10.1093/mnras/stz3361

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz3361 2020

  8. [8]

    2001, , 562, L103, 10.1086/338052

    Asai , A., Shimojo , M., Isobe , H., et al. 2001, , 562, L103, 10.1086/338052

    work page doi:10.1086/338052 2001

Show all 101 references
  1. [9]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    Barnes, S. A. 2003, , 586, 464, 10.1086/367639

    2003 doi

  3. [11]

    2020, , 643, A106, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038881

    Bashi , D., et al. 2020, , 643, A106, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038881

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    T., et al

    Bellotti , S., Morin , J., Lehmann , L. T., et al. 2023, , 676, A56, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346845

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    Booth , M., Dent , W. R. F., Jord \'a n , A., et al. 2017, , 469, 3200, 10.1093/mnras/stx1072

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    E., Ade, P

    Carlstrom, J. E., Ade, P. A. R., Aird, K. A., et al. 2011, , 123, 568, 10.1086/659879

    2011 doi

  7. [15]

    2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    CASA Team , Bean , B., Bhatnagar , S., et al. 2022, , 134, 114501, 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    2000, , 38, 337, 10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.337

    Chabrier , G., & Baraffe , I. 2000, , 38, 337, 10.1146/annurev.astro.38.1.337

    2000 doi

  9. [17]

    2016, IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 6, 223, 10.1109/TTHZ.2016.2525762

    Chenu , J.-Y., Navarrini , A., Bortolotti , Y., et al. 2016, IEEE Transactions on Terahertz Science and Technology, 6, 223, 10.1109/TTHZ.2016.2525762

    2016

  10. [18]

    2006, A&A, 452, 987, 10.1051/0004-6361:20053615

    Crespo-Chac \'o n , I., et al. 2006, A&A, 452, 987, 10.1051/0004-6361:20053615

    2006 doi

  11. [19]

    Dal , H. A. 2020, , 495, 4529, 10.1093/mnras/staa1484

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    Damian, B., Jose, J., Biller, B., & Paul, K. T. 2023, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 44, 77, 10.1007/s12036-023-09878-4

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    2021, , 921, 9, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1075

    Das , B., & Chandra , P. 2021, , 921, 9, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1075

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    Davenport, J. R. A. 2016, , 829, 23, 10.3847/0004-637x/829/1/23

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    2000, Proc

    Dekker, H., D’Odorico, S., Kaufer, A., Delabre, B., & Kotzlowski, H. 2000, Proc. SPIE, 4008, 534, 10.1117/12.395512

    2000 doi

  16. [24]

    F., & Landstreet , J

    Donati , J. F., & Landstreet , J. D. 2009, , 47, 333, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101833

    2009 doi

  17. [25]

    Dulk , G. A. 1985, , 23, 169, 10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001125

    1985

  18. [26]

    A., Melrose , D

    Dulk , G. A., Melrose , D. B., & White , S. M. 1979, , 234, 1137, 10.1086/157597

    1979 doi

  19. [27]

    R., Gon c alves , B

    Ferreira , R. R., Gon c alves , B. F. O., do Nascimento , J. D., & Castro , M. 2024, , 535, 2394, 10.1093/mnras/stae2381

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    D., & Kontar , E

    Fleishman , G. D., & Kontar , E. P. 2010, , 709, L127, 10.1088/2041-8205/709/2/L127

    2010 doi

  21. [29]

    D., Kuznetsov , A

    Fleishman , G. D., Kuznetsov , A. A., & Landi , E. 2021, , 914, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/abf92c

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    Fuhrmeister , B., Schmitt , J. H. M. M., & Hauschildt , P. H. 2005, , 439, 1137, 10.1051/0004-6361:20042338

    2005 doi

  23. [31]

    2021, , 649, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657

    Gaia Collaboration . 2021, , 649, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657

    2021 doi

  24. [32]

    J., Dotter , A., et al

    Garraffo , C., Drake , J. J., Dotter , A., et al. 2018, , 862, 90, 10.3847/1538-4357/aace5d

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    Gary , D. E. 2023, , 61, 427, 10.1146/annurev-astro-071221-052744

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    L., & Zhelezniakov , V

    Ginzburg , V. L., & Zhelezniakov , V. V. 1958, , 2, 653

    1958

  27. [35]

    2002, , 40, 217, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093806

    G \"u del , M. 2002, , 40, 217, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093806

    2002

  28. [36]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  29. [37]

    H., & Baron , E

    Hauschildt , P. H., & Baron , E. 1999, , 109, 41. astro-ph/9808182

    1999 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Herbig , G. H. 1985, , 289, 269, 10.1086/162887

    1985 doi

  31. [39]

    S., MacGregor , M

    Howard , W. S., MacGregor , M. A., Osten , R., et al. 2022, , 938, 103, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9134

    2022 doi

  32. [40]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in science & engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  33. [41]

    O., Wende-von Berg , S., Dreizler , S., et al

    Husser , T. O., Wende-von Berg , S., Dreizler , S., et al. 2013, , 553, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219058

    2013 doi

  34. [42]

    Kaufmann , P., Correia , E., Costa , J. E. R., Vaz , A. M. Z., & Dennis , B. R. 1985, , 313, 380, 10.1038/313380a0

    1985 doi

  35. [43]

    P., Correia , E., et al

    Kaufmann , P., Raulin , J. P., Correia , E., et al. 2001, , 548, L95, 10.1086/318932

    2001 doi

  36. [44]

    O., & Le Bouquin , J

    Kervella , P., M \'e rand , A., Ledoux , C., Demory , B. O., & Le Bouquin , J. B. 2016, , 593, A127, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628631

    2016 doi

  37. [45]

    M., Kaufmann , P., Raulin , J.-P., & Szpigel , S

    Klopf , J. M., Kaufmann , P., Raulin , J.-P., & Szpigel , S. 2014, , 791, 31, 10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/31

    2014 doi

  38. [46]

    G., Hudson , H

    Krucker , S., Gim \'e nez de Castro , C. G., Hudson , H. S., et al. 2013, , 21, 58, 10.1007/s00159-013-0058-3

    2013 doi

  39. [47]

    R., & Willson , R

    Lang , K. R., & Willson , R. F. 1986, , 305, 363, 10.1086/164253

    1986 doi

  40. [48]

    2015, , 576, A72, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425422

    Lestrade , J.-F., & Thilliez , E. 2015, , 576, A72, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425422

    2015 doi

  41. [49]

    Linsky, J. L. 2017, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 55, 159, 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055327

    2017 doi

  42. [50]

    J., Harsono, D., et al

    Long, F., Herczeg, G. J., Harsono, D., et al. 2019, , 882, 49, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2f73

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    R., Lenc , E., Kaplan , D

    Lynch , C. R., Lenc , E., Kaplan , D. L., Murphy , T., & Anderson , G. E. 2017, , 836, L30, 10.3847/2041-8213/aa5ffd

    2017 doi

  44. [52]

    M., Osten , R

    MacGregor , A. M., Osten , R. A., & Hughes , A. M. 2020, , 891, 80, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab711d

    2020 doi

  45. [53]

    A., Weinberger , A

    MacGregor , M. A., Weinberger , A. J., Wilner , D. J., Kowalski , A. F., & Cranmer , S. R. 2018, , 855, L2, 10.3847/2041-8213/aaad6b

    2018 doi

  46. [54]

    A., Matr \`a , L., Kalas , P., et al

    MacGregor , M. A., Matr \`a , L., Kalas , P., et al. 2017, , 842, 8, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa71ae

    2017 doi

  47. [55]

    E., & Hillenbrand , L

    Mamajek , E. E., & Hillenbrand , L. A. 2008, , 687, 1264, 10.1086/591785

    2008 doi

  48. [56]

    W., Feiden , G

    Mann , A. W., Feiden , G. A., Gaidos , E., Boyajian , T., & von Braun , K. 2015, , 804, 64, 10.1088/0004-637X/804/1/64

    2015 doi

  49. [57]

    C., Pani \'c , O., et al

    Marino , S., Wyatt , M. C., Pani \'c , O., et al. 2017, , 465, 2595, 10.1093/mnras/stw2867

    2017 doi

  50. [58]

    C., Petit , P., Jeffers , S

    Marsden , S. C., Petit , P., Jeffers , S. V., et al. 2014, , 444, 3517, 10.1093/mnras/stu1663

    2014 doi

  51. [59]

    Melrose , D. B. 2017, Reviews of Modern Plasma Physics, 1, 5, 10.1007/s41614-017-0007-0

    2017 doi

  52. [60]

    B., & Sy , W

    Melrose , D. B., & Sy , W. N. 1972, Australian Journal of Physics, 25, 387, 10.1071/PH720387

    1972 doi

  53. [61]

    2023, in Planetary, Solar and Heliospheric Radio Emissions IX, ed

    Mohan , A. 2023, in Planetary, Solar and Heliospheric Radio Emissions IX, ed. C. K. Louis , C. M. Jackman , G. Fischer , A. H. Sulaiman , & P. Zucca , 04051, 10.25546/104051

    2023 doi

  54. [62]

    2024, , 686, A51, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347924

    Mohan , A., Mondal , S., Wedemeyer , S., & Gopalswamy , N. 2024, , 686, A51, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347924

    2024 doi

  55. [63]

    H., Pandit , S., & Saberi , M

    Mohan , A., Wedemeyer , S., Hauschildt , P. H., Pandit , S., & Saberi , M. 2022, , 664, L9, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244385

    2022 doi

  56. [64]

    Mohan , A., Wedemeyer , S., Pandit , S., Saberi , M., & Hauschildt , P. H. 2021, , 655, A113, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142095

    2021 doi

  57. [65]

    F., Chen , B., & Yu , S

    Mondal , S., Battaglia , A. F., Chen , B., & Yu , S. 2024, , 966, 208, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3910

    2024 doi

  58. [66]

    2008, MNRAS, 390, 567, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13809.x

    Morin , J., et al. 2008, MNRAS, 390, 567, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13809.x

    2008

  59. [67]

    W., Mutabazi , T., & Jurua , E

    Muheki , P., Guenther , E. W., Mutabazi , T., & Jurua , E. 2020, , 637, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936904

    2020 doi

  60. [68]

    2020, , 72, 68, 10.1093/pasj/psaa051

    Namekata , K., Maehara , H., Sasaki , R., et al. 2020, , 72, 68, 10.1093/pasj/psaa051

    2020 doi

  61. [69]

    2020, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 7, 57, 10.3389/fspas.2020.00057

    Nindos , A. 2020, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 7, 57, 10.3389/fspas.2020.00057

    2020

  62. [70]

    W., Hartmann , L

    Noyes , R. W., Hartmann , L. W., Baliunas , S. L., Duncan , D. K., & Vaughan , A. H. 1984, , 279, 763, 10.1086/161945

    1984 doi

  63. [71]

    A., & Bastian , T

    Osten , R. A., & Bastian , T. S. 2006, , 637, 1016, 10.1086/498410

    2006 doi

  64. [72]

    2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, latest, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    pandas development team, T. 2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, latest, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    2020 doi

  65. [73]

    2023, , 673, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245412

    Pandit , S., Wedemeyer , S., Carlsson , M., & Szydlarski , M. 2023, , 673, A137, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245412

    2023 doi

  66. [74]

    2024, , 970, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4356

    Plant , K., Hallinan , G., & Bastian , T. 2024, , 970, 56, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4356

    2024 doi

  67. [75]

    A., Cordero , G., & Lavalley , C

    Poveda , A., Allen , C., Herrera , M. A., Cordero , G., & Lavalley , C. 1996, , 308, 55

    1996

  68. [76]

    2025, , 980, 196, 10.3847/1538-4357/adabc3

    Ram , D., Mondal , S., Patra , D., Ghosh , S., & Khumbhakar , R. 2025, , 980, 196, 10.3847/1538-4357/adabc3

    2025 doi

  69. [77]

    G., et al

    Raulin , J.-P., Kaufmann , P., Gim \'e nez de Castro , C. G., et al. 2003, , 592, 580, 10.1086/375718

    2003 doi

  70. [78]

    J., et al

    Reiners , A., Shulyak , D., K \"a pyl \"a , P. J., et al. 2022, , 662, A41, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243251

    2022 doi

  71. [79]

    Robrade , J., & Schmitt , J. H. M. M. 2005, , 435, 1073, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041941

    2005 doi

  72. [80]

    2021, , 645, A100, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038827

    Sebastian , D., Gillon , M., Ducrot , E., et al. 2021, , 645, A100, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038827

    2021 doi

  73. [81]

    2023, , 950, 71, 10.3847/1538-4357/accc8c

    Shen, J., Li, J., Huang, Y., et al. 2023, , 950, 71, 10.3847/1538-4357/accc8c

    2023 doi

  74. [82]

    Silva , A. V. R., Gary , D. E., White , S. M., Lin , R. P., & de Pater , I. 1997, , 175, 157, 10.1023/A:1004930816340

    1997 doi

  75. [83]

    2016, , 591, A118, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628497

    Soubiran , C., Le Campion , J.-F., Brouillet , N., & Chemin , L. 2016, , 591, A118, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628497

    2016 doi

  76. [84]

    2022, , 667, L9, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244642

    Stelzer , B., Caramazza , M., Raetz , S., Argiroffi , C., & Coffaro , M. 2022, , 667, L9, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244642

    2022 doi

  77. [85]

    1994, , 292, 191

    Stepien , K. 1994, , 292, 191

    1994

  78. [86]

    M., Bastian , T

    Suresh , A., Chatterjee , S., Cordes , J. M., Bastian , T. S., & Hallinan , G. 2020, , 904, 138, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc004

    2020 doi

  79. [87]

    2024, , 972, 6, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad58db

    Tandoi , C., Guns , S., Foster , A., et al. 2024, , 972, 6, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad58db

    2024 doi

  80. [88]

    2018, , 481, 217, 10.1093/mnras/sty2280

    Trigilio , C., Umana , G., Cavallaro , F., et al. 2018, , 481, 217, 10.1093/mnras/sty2280

    2018 doi

  81. [89]

    2008, , 678, 509, 10.1086/528787

    Trottet , G., Krucker , S., L \"u thi , T., & Magun , A. 2008, , 678, 509, 10.1086/528787

    2008 doi

  82. [90]

    N., & Kaplan , S

    Tsytovich , V. N., & Kaplan , S. A. 1969, , 12, 618

    1969

  83. [91]

    van den Besselaar , E. J. M., Raassen , A. J. J., Mewe , R., et al. 2003, , 411, 587, 10.1051/0004-6361:20031398

    2003 doi

  84. [92]

    L., Ceillier , T., Metcalfe , T

    van Saders , J. L., Ceillier , T., Metcalfe , T. S., et al. 2016, , 529, 181, 10.1038/nature16168

    2016 doi

  85. [93]

    A., Gregory , S

    Vidotto , A. A., Gregory , S. G., Jardine , M., et al. 2014, , 441, 2361, 10.1093/mnras/stu728

    2014 doi

  86. [94]

    2019, ApJ, 871, 214, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf88e

    Villadsen , J., & Hallinan , G. 2019, ApJ, 871, 214, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf88e

    2019 doi

  87. [95]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  88. [96]

    2016, , 200, 1, 10.1007/s11214-015-0229-9

    Wedemeyer , S., Bastian , T., Braj s a , R., et al. 2016, , 200, 1, 10.1007/s11214-015-0229-9

    2016 doi

  89. [97]

    A., Tapia-V \'a zquez , F., Hughes , A

    White , J. A., Tapia-V \'a zquez , F., Hughes , A. G., et al. 2020, , 894, 76, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8467

    2020 doi

  90. [98]

    White , S. M. 2004, , 48, 1319, 10.1016/j.newar.2004.09.014

    2004 doi

  91. [99]

    Wilson , O. C. 1968, , 153, 221, 10.1086/149652

    1968 doi

  92. [100]

    V., Stepanov , A

    Zaitsev , V. V., Stepanov , A. V., & Kaufmann , P. 2014, , 289, 3017, 10.1007/s11207-014-0515-9

    2014 doi

  93. [101]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.archive archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix ":" * if FUNCTION format.primaryClass primaryClass empty "" " [" primaryClass * "]" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty pages empty not booktitle empty not or or ""...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.