The Starlink Robot: A Platform and Dataset for Mobile Satellite Communication

Boyi Liu; Dimitrios Kanoulas; Jagmohan Chauhan; Jianhao Jiao; Qiang Yang; Qianyi Zhang

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The Starlink Robot: A Platform and Dataset for Mobile Satellite Communication

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A wheeled robot carrying a Starlink terminal and a synchronized sensor suite provides the first platform and dataset for studying how motion and sky occlusion affect satellite internet, with preliminary results showing tree cover—not…

desk verdict A genuinely useful platform/dataset paper whose load-bearing synchronization and LEOViz-parsing claims need validation before the dataset is trusted as ground truth. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.19781 v3 pith:P5U7AO6W submitted 2025-06-24 cs.RO cs.NI

Boyi Liu , Qianyi Zhang , Qiang Yang , Jianhao Jiao , Jagmohan Chauhan , Dimitrios Kanoulas This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.ROcs.NI

keywords mobilesatellitecommunicationStarlinkroboticplatformmultimodaldatasetLEOsatellitesskyvisibilitytimesynchronizationmotion-awareconnectivity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces a wheeled robot carrying a Starlink satellite terminal, an upward-facing fisheye camera, LiDAR, and IMU, and argues this is the first platform able to measure satellite internet performance during controlled movement with full environmental context. Its central goal is to provide the research community with an open, synchronized multi-modal dataset—communication metrics, satellite geometry, motion, sky visibility, and 3D surroundings—so that mobile satellite connectivity can be studied where static measurements fall short. Using this setup, the authors report preliminary findings that pedestrian-scale speed barely affects Starlink link quality, while tree cover and visibility constraints cause frequent RTT spikes and unstable handovers. A sympathetic reader would see the contribution as the reproducible measurement infrastructure itself, plus early evidence that occlusion, not velocity, dominates the mobile experience.

What carries the argument

The central object is the integrated platform: a Unitree GO2 wheeled robot with a Starlink Mini terminal, an upward-facing 185-degree fisheye camera, a Livox Mid-360 LiDAR, and IMU plus wheel odometry, all time-synchronized through a ROS-based core. The named software tool LEOViz—an open-source parser for Starlink's gRPC status interface—supplies the 1 Hz satellite positions, elevation and azimuth angles, SNR, and connection status. The mechanism that carries the argument is the synchronization pipeline that aligns high-rate sensor streams (camera about 15 Hz, LiDAR about 25 Hz, IMU about 8 Hz) with 1 Hz Starlink statistics and 10 Hz ICMP probes into unified HDF5 files, making it possible to correlate sky visibility and motion with link quality.

What would settle it

Compare the aligned dataset against an independent ground-truth time source: place a bright LED flash in the fisheye view synchronized to a GPS pulse while simultaneously logging the Starlink terminal's gRPC status; if the reported timestamps of the flash and the communication metrics disagree beyond the stated alignment error, or if LEOViz's parsed 1 Hz metrics diverge from a direct terminal query run in parallel, the central claim of a synchronized multi-modal dataset loses its basis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a purpose-built mobile robotic platform with a Starlink Mini terminal and synchronized sensors can capture, for the first time, the full physical context of satellite communication while moving, and that the resulting dataset reveals patterns invisible to stationary terminals. The paper reports two preliminary findings: at slow (about 0.8 m/s) and fast (about 2.0 m/s) pedestrian speeds, RTT remains concentrated in the 35–45 ms range with handovers every roughly 15 seconds, so velocity itself has minimal impact; in tree-covered environments, RTT becomes unstable with spikes of 40–100 ms, showing that sky visibility and handover options, not motion speed, drive mobile satellite performance. The authors also claim the platform and dataset enable motion-aware protocols, connectivity-disruption prediction, and communication-aware path planning.

Load-bearing premise

The dataset's usefulness rests on the claim that all streams—including the 1 Hz Starlink statistics parsed by LEOViz—are time-aligned with sub-millisecond accuracy, but the paper provides no validation data or error analysis for that alignment.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

At pedestrian speeds, Starlink's phased-array beam steering compensates for motion, so delivery robots and walking users need not treat velocity as a primary link risk.
Environmental occlusion dominates mobile satellite performance, so communication-aware path planning and predictive handover should focus on sky visibility and canopy gaps.
Researchers can use the released dataset to train models that predict RTT degradation or handover timing from fisheye sky images and LiDAR geometry.
The roughly 15-second handover cadence manifests as predictable RTT step changes, enabling disruption prediction in open environments.
The platform's open design allows other groups to replicate the measurement setup and extend it to new terminal models and constellations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

An obvious extension the paper leaves implicit is using the fisheye sky-visibility stream alone as a proxy for link quality, letting mobile devices with simple cameras anticipate dropouts without relying on the terminal's internal telemetry.
If the sub-millisecond synchronization claim holds, the dataset supports supervised learning that maps 3D LiDAR geometry directly to expected RTT variance, a step toward communication-aware navigation in cluttered cities.
The reported 1 Hz terminal statistics may smooth out fast handover transients, so a testable follow-up would re-run the same routes while logging directly from the terminal's gRPC stream at a higher rate rather than through LEOViz.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The Starlink Robot paper is worth taking seriously. The core contribution is a first integration of a Starlink Mini on a wheeled robot with synchronized overhead camera, LiDAR, IMU, and communication metrics, plus a dataset covering open and tree-lined environments. That is a real gap: prior mobile Starlink measurements lacked precisely the synchronized motion and sky-visibility context this platform captures. The hardware choices are sensible, and releasing both design and data is a community service. If the dataset is sound, it enables work on motion-aware protocols and outage prediction that nobody else has done with public data.

The weak point is exactly where the reader's stress-test lands. Section 3.2 claims 'sub-millisecond alignment accuracy across all modalities' without showing method, error analysis, or validation traces. For a 1 Hz gRPC-parsed stream from the Starlink terminal, that claim is not self-evident; the terminal's internal measurement epoch is unknown, and software timestamps are not hardware triggers. The paper also uses LEOViz's parsed throughput, RTT, SNR, and obstruction state as ground truth throughout Section 5 without any independent check against a known-good measurement. If LEOViz mis-parses a field or the terminal's stats are delayed relative to the sensor streams, every cross-modal correlation in the dataset is compromised. The paper's own Section 4 promises 'time synchronization information' in the metadata, but the preprint contains none.

The preliminary analysis is also thin: no error bars, no statistical tests, just qualitative descriptions of RTT traces. The observed patterns are plausible, and the open-vs-tree comparison is suggestive, but it is not yet evidence. These are addressable issues, not fatal ones. The platform itself could still be cited, and the dataset could be genuinely valuable after validation.

I agree with the reader's CONDITIONAL verdict and think the stress-test note holds up on reading the paper. The paper deserves peer review, not desk rejection. A serious referee should ask for three things: (1) validation of the sub-millisecond synchronization claim with concrete timestamps and offsets, (2) an independent sanity check of LEOViz fields against direct measurements (e.g., known throughput from iperf or RTT from a separate tool), and (3) basic statistics (means, variances, sample counts) for the Section 5 comparisons. With those, this becomes a strong dataset paper and a useful community resource.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the Starlink Robot, a wheeled Unitree GO2 platform equipped with a Starlink Mini terminal, an upward-facing fisheye camera, a Livox Mid-360 LiDAR, IMU, and onboard computing. The authors describe the hardware and software architecture, a multi-modal dataset of communication metrics, motion data, sky visibility, and 3D environmental context, and a preliminary analysis of how movement speed and environmental occlusion affect Starlink latency. Satellite state and terminal statistics are collected via LEOViz's parsing of Starlink's gRPC interface. The central claims are that this is the first mobile robotic platform for Starlink measurement and that the released synchronized dataset enables future mobile satellite communication research. The paper is written as a platform-and-dataset contribution, with descriptive rather than hypothesis-driven results.

Significance. If the synchronization and the parsed Starlink metrics are validated, the dataset would be a valuable community resource: it is, to my knowledge, one of the first publicly described mobile Starlink measurement platforms with co-registered motion, sky-view, and communication data. The paper ships an open GitHub repository, a clear system architecture diagram, and descriptive observations about latency behavior under motion and tree cover. The strengths are the reproducible platform design and the breadth of modalities. However, the significance is conditional on two unverified links: the claimed sub-millisecond alignment of all streams, and the correctness of LEOViz-parsed terminal statistics as ground truth. The preliminary analysis currently provides qualitative pattern reports rather than quantitative evidence, which limits the scientific contribution in its present form.

major comments (4)

[3.2 Software Architecture] The claim of 'sub-millisecond alignment accuracy across all modalities' is load-bearing for the synchronized dataset claim but is unsupported by the manuscript. No synchronization method, clock model, timestamp-correction algorithm, or validation trace is provided. For the Starlink 1 Hz stream, which arrives through LEOViz parsing of software-timestamped gRPC messages, sub-millisecond alignment requires knowing the terminal's internal measurement epoch, which the paper never establishes. Please add an alignment validation, for example residual clock offsets, aligned event timestamps, or a hardware-triggered cross-check between sensors and the Starlink stream.
[4 Dataset Description and 5 Preliminary Analysis] LEOViz-parsed terminal statistics (RTT, SNR, throughput, obstruction state) are treated as ground truth throughout Section 5, but no independent validation is shown. A systematic parsing error or a software-timestamp delay in the gRPC data would compromise every cross-modal correlation while leaving the reported time series internally consistent. Please validate the parsed fields against independent measurements (e.g., concurrent ICMP RTT probes, external throughput tests, or manual obstruction events) and report per-field error statistics or timing offsets.
[5.1 and 5.2 Preliminary Analysis] The central findings—'minimal impact' of velocity on RTT, 'predictable 15-second handover intervals', and 'substantial instability' in tree-covered environments—are based on qualitative inspection of a small number of time-series figures (Figures 9-12 and 15) with no error bars, no session counts, no per-condition summary statistics, and no statistical tests. These claims outrun the evidence as presented. Please report medians/quantiles per speed and environment condition, the number of experimental runs, and, where appropriate, inferential tests or effect sizes.
[4 Dataset Description and Abstract] Dataset availability is not verifiable from the manuscript. The abstract points to a general GitHub repository, but Section 4's promise of 'download' and 'Metadata: time synchronization information' is not backed by a persistent dataset identifier, a download URL, a schema description, checksums, or a concrete list of the metadata contents. The dataset's value is the central contribution, so the paper should include a stable dataset link and a complete metadata table.

minor comments (4)

[1 Introduction] The phrase 'first mobile robotic platform' should be softened or carefully scoped, since reference [9] already reports vehicle-mounted Starlink measurements; please clarify the distinction (e.g., robot-centric, multi-modal, synchronized, openly released).
[Figures 9, 10, 12, 15] Please add axis labels, units, and legends to the RTT figures, and make the handover step changes and the 1 Hz sample points legible; the current figures are hard to read at the printed scale.
[4 Dataset Description] Minor formatting issue: in the 'Data Format and Organization' paragraph, 'GPS coordinates;CSV files' is missing a space after the semicolon.
[3.2 Software Architecture] Please clarify the relationship between LEOViz data and the Starlink gRPC interface, and state explicitly which fields are parsed by LEOViz and which are recorded directly by the robot; this distinction matters for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper is a platform/dataset report with descriptive observations; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction and no claim reduces to its input by construction.

full rationale

The paper's claims are (1) construction of a mobile Starlink platform, (2) release of a synchronized multimodal dataset, and (3) descriptive preliminary observations (RTT stability at pedestrian speeds, higher RTT variance under tree cover). None of these is derived from a fitted parameter or from an equation that embeds the target result. The Starlink communication metrics are terminal-reported and parsed by the third-party LEOViz tool; they are recorded as observations, not predicted. The synchronization claim in Section 3.2 ('achieving sub-millisecond alignment accuracy across all modalities') is unvalidated, and LEOViz parsing is not independently checked, but those are correctness/verification risks, not circularity: no quantity is defined in terms of another quantity and then recovered as a prediction. The paper also does not rest on a load-bearing self-citation chain; LEOViz is cited as a tool, not as a uniqueness theorem or proof. Therefore there is no step where an output is equivalent to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's claims rest on unverified domain assumptions about measurement accuracy and representativeness rather than on free parameters or invented entities. No numbers are fit to data.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Starlink Mini terminal-reported statistics (throughput, RTT, SNR, obstruction state) are accurate and representative of actual link quality.
The dataset's core communication metrics rely on the terminal's internal reporting, parsed by LEOViz (Sections 3.2 and 4). The paper does not provide independent ground-truth validation.
domain assumption The multi-modal time synchronization achieves sub-millisecond alignment accuracy.
Section 3.2 claims this accuracy without presenting a validation procedure or error analysis. Cross-modal correlation depends on this.
domain assumption The selected environments (open stadium roads and tree-lined streets) and speeds (0.8 and 2.0 m/s) are representative of mobile satellite communication scenarios.
Section 5 uses only these conditions for the preliminary analysis; generalizability beyond them is unestablished.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Starlink Robot: A Platform and Dataset for Mobile Satellite Communication." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P5U7AO6W

@misc{pith2026250619781,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Starlink Robot: A Platform and Dataset for Mobile Satellite Communication},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P5U7AO6W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.19781}
}

read the original abstract

The integration of satellite communication into mobile devices represents a paradigm shift in connectivity, yet the performance characteristics under motion and environmental occlusion remain poorly understood. We present the Starlink Robot, the first mobile robotic platform equipped with Starlink satellite internet, comprehensive sensor suite including upward-facing camera, LiDAR, and IMU, designed to systematically study satellite communication performance during movement. Our multi-modal dataset captures synchronized communication metrics, motion dynamics, sky visibility, and 3D environmental context across diverse scenarios including steady-state motion, variable speeds, and different occlusion conditions. This platform and dataset enable researchers to develop motion-aware communication protocols, predict connectivity disruptions, and optimize satellite communication for emerging mobile applications from smartphones to autonomous vehicles. In this work, we use LEOViz for real-time satellite tracking and data collection. The starlink robot project is available at https://github.com/StarlinkRobot.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.19781 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The Starlink Robot platform integrating a Unitree GO2 wheeled robot with Starlink Mini terminal, upward-facing fisheye camera, and Livox Mid-360 LiDAR for comprehensive mobile satellite communication research. – homes, businesses, and fixed installations. The Starlink Mini’s recent introduction has made portable satellite internet more accessible, but fundamental questions remain unanswered. How does motion affec… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** System architecture of the Starlink Robot platform showing multi-modal sensor integration, data synchronization pipeline, and analysis framework for correlating communication performance with environmental and motion context. velocity control from 0.1 to 2.0 m/s – spanning the range from slow walking to jogging speeds. The Starlink Mini terminal mounts atop the robot via a custom aluminum frame designed to maintai… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Starlink terminal’s obstruction detection output (left) and Dual-view obstruction analysis showing fisheye camera sky visibility (right), demonstrating real-time obstruction mapping capabilities. These are visualized by LEOViz [3, 23] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (6 more)

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: LiDAR-based 3D point cloud visualization capturing environmental geometry around the robot, enabling precise obstruction detection. Pose [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Robot pose and motion data indicating position, velocity, orientation, and trajectory information synchronized with communication performance metrics point cloud data revealing environmental geometry including buildings, trees, and other obstacles. The LiDAR data ena…

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: RTT performance during low-speed movement showing communication stability and handover patterns while maintaining slow velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_9.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: Environmental context and the robot running scenario in tree-covered area showing robot navigation through foliagedense paths with limited sky visibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_13.png]

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Extended RTT measurements in open environment demonstrating periodic satellite handover patterns and baseline performance characteristics without environmental obstructions. robotic platform across two representative urban environments, demonstrating the profound inf…

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: Communication performance in tree-covered environment demonstrating increased RTT instability and frequent spikes due to limited satellite visibility. satellites are in view, the terminal’s handover options diminish, potentially leading to connections with suboptima…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Edge-Side Fingerprints of Service Tiering and Quota Throttling in Starlink
eess.SP 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Portal-defined Starlink tiers and quota throttling produce separable edge-side signatures in goodput, PoP RTT, and the ratio R=C_int/T_user, enabling a lightweight detector on one UK residential terminal.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

CRAWDAD: Community Resource for Archiving Wireless Data at Dartmouth

2025. CRAWDAD: Community Resource for Archiving Wireless Data at Dartmouth. https://ieee-dataport.org/collections/crawdad. Ac- cessed: 2025-06-18

work page 2025
[2]

Starlink Business | Maritime

2025. Starlink Business | Maritime. https://www.starlink.com/business/ maritime. Accessed: 2025-06-18

work page 2025
[3]

Ali Ahangarpour, Jinwei Zhao, and Jianping Pan. 2024. Trajectory- based Serving Satellite Identification with User Terminal’s Field-of- View. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on LEO Net- working and Communication. 55–60

work page 2024
[4]

Xia Deng, Le Chang, Shouyuan Zeng, Lin Cai, and Jianping Pan. 2022. Distance-based back-pressure routing for load-balancing LEO satellite networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 72, 1 (2022), 1240–1253

work page 2022
[5]

Junhao Hu, Lin Cai, Chengcheng Zhao, and Jianping Pan. 2020. Di- rected percolation routing for ultra-reliable and low-latency services in low earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks. In2020 IEEE 92nd vehicular technology conference (VTC2020-Fall). IEEE, 1–6

work page 2020
[6]

International Telecommunication Union- Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R). 2021. Recommendation ITU -R M.2150: Detailed specifications of the radio interfaces of IMT-2020 . Recommendation M.2150-0. Inter- national Telecommunication Union. https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC- M.2150 [accessed 2025-06-18]

work page 2021
[7]

Victor Kamel, Jinwei Zhao, Daoping Li, and Jianping Pan. 2024. Star- QUIC: Tuning Congestion Control Algorithms for QUIC over LEO Satellite Networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on LEO Networking and Communication . 43–48

work page 2024
[8]

Mohamed M Kassem, Aravindh Raman, Diego Perino, and Nishanth Sastry. 2022. A browser-side view of starlink connectivity. In Proceed- ings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference . 151–158

work page 2022

Show all 25 references

[9]

Dominic Laniewski, Eric Lanfer, and Nils Aschenbruck. 2025. Measur- ing Mobile Starlink Performance: A Comprehensive Look. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society (2025)

2025
[10]

Daoping Li, Jinwei Zhao, and Jianping Pan. 2025. FTRL-WRR: Learning- Based Two-Path Scheduler for LEO Networks. In 2025 IEEE 22nd Con- sumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC) . IEEE, 1–6

2025
[11]

Tengfei Liu, Tingting Wang, Ye Li, Jinwei Zhao, Ruifeng Gao, and Jianping Pan. 2025. Modeling Packet Loss of Low-Earth Orbit Satellite Networks. In 2025 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). IEEE, 1–6

2025
[12]

Jianping Pan, Jinwei Zhao, and Lin Cai. 2023. Measuring a low-earth- orbit satellite network. In 2023 IEEE 34th Annual International Sympo- sium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) . IEEE, 1–6

2023
[13]

Jianping Pan, Jinwei Zhao, and Lin Cai. 2024. Measuring the satellite links of a LEO network. In ICC 2024-IEEE International Conference on Communications. IEEE, 4439–4444

2024
[14]

Valentin Platzgummer, Vaclav Raida, Gerfried Krainz, Philipp Svo- boda, Martin Lerch, and Markus Rupp. 2019. UAV-based coverage measurement method for 5G. In 2019 IEEE 90th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Fall). IEEE, 1–6

2019
[15]

Weibiao Tian, Ye Li, Jinwei Zhao, Sheng Wu, and Jianping Pan. 2024. An eBPF-Based Trace-Driven Emulation Method for Satellite Net- works. IEEE Networking Letters (2024)

2024
[16]

Muhammad Asad Ullah, Antti Heikkinen, Mikko Uitto, Antti Antto- nen, and Konstantin Mikhaylov. 2025. Impact of Weather on Satel- lite Communication: Evaluating Starlink Resilience. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04772 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[17]

Bingsen Wang, Xiaohui Zhang, Shuai Wang, Li Chen, Jinwei Zhao, Jianping Pan, Dan Li, and Yong Jiang. 2024. A Large-Scale IPv6-Based Boyi Liu, Qianyi Zhang, Qiang Yang, Jianhao Jiao, Jagmohan Chauhan, and Dimitrios Kanoulas Measurement of the Starlink Network. arXiv preprint ar...

2024
[18]

Yufei Wang, Lin Cai, and Jun Liu. 2023. High-Reliability, Low-Latency, and Load-Balancing Multipath Routing for LEO Satellite Networks. In 2023 Biennial Symposium on Communications (BSC) . IEEE, 107–111

2023
[19]

Wenjun Yang, Lin Cai, Shengjie Shu, and Jianping Pan. 2024. Mobility- aware congestion control for multipath QUIC in integrated terrestrial satellite networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2024)

2024
[20]

Wenjun Yang, Shengjie Shu, Lin Cai, and Jianping Pan. 2021. MM- QUIC: Mobility-aware multipath QUIC for satellite networks. In 2021 17th International Conference on Mobility, Sensing and Networking (MSN). IEEE, 608–615

2021
[21]

Jinwei Zhao and Jianping Pan. 2024. LENS: A LEO Satellite Network Measurement Dataset. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference. 278–284

2024
[22]

Jinwei Zhao and Jianping Pan. 2024. Low-Latency Live Video Stream- ing over a Low-Earth-Orbit Satellite Network with DASH. In Proceed- ings of the 15th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference . 109–120

2024
[23]

Jinwei Zhao and Jianping Pan. 2025. GitHub repository. https://github. com/clarkzjw/LEOViz

2025
[24]

Jinkai Zheng, Tom H Luan, Guanjie Li, Yanfeng Zhang, Mingfeng Yuan, and Jianping Pan. 2025. QTER: QoS-Aware Three-Dimensional Efficient and Reliable Routing for LEO Satellite Networks.IEEE Internet of Things Journal (2025)

2025
[25]

Jinkai Zheng, Tom H Luan, Jinwei Zhao, Guanjie Li, Yao Zhang, Jian- ping Pan, and Nan Cheng. 2024. Adaptive Multi-Link Data Allocation for LEO Satellite Networks. In GLOBECOM 2024-2024 IEEE Global Communications Conference. IEEE, 3021–3026

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

CRAWDAD: Community Resource for Archiving Wireless Data at Dartmouth

2025. CRAWDAD: Community Resource for Archiving Wireless Data at Dartmouth. https://ieee-dataport.org/collections/crawdad. Ac- cessed: 2025-06-18

work page 2025

[2] [2]

Starlink Business | Maritime

2025. Starlink Business | Maritime. https://www.starlink.com/business/ maritime. Accessed: 2025-06-18

work page 2025

[3] [3]

Ali Ahangarpour, Jinwei Zhao, and Jianping Pan. 2024. Trajectory- based Serving Satellite Identification with User Terminal’s Field-of- View. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on LEO Net- working and Communication. 55–60

work page 2024

[4] [4]

Xia Deng, Le Chang, Shouyuan Zeng, Lin Cai, and Jianping Pan. 2022. Distance-based back-pressure routing for load-balancing LEO satellite networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 72, 1 (2022), 1240–1253

work page 2022

[5] [5]

Junhao Hu, Lin Cai, Chengcheng Zhao, and Jianping Pan. 2020. Di- rected percolation routing for ultra-reliable and low-latency services in low earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks. In2020 IEEE 92nd vehicular technology conference (VTC2020-Fall). IEEE, 1–6

work page 2020

[6] [6]

International Telecommunication Union- Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R). 2021. Recommendation ITU -R M.2150: Detailed specifications of the radio interfaces of IMT-2020 . Recommendation M.2150-0. Inter- national Telecommunication Union. https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC- M.2150 [accessed 2025-06-18]

work page 2021

[7] [7]

Victor Kamel, Jinwei Zhao, Daoping Li, and Jianping Pan. 2024. Star- QUIC: Tuning Congestion Control Algorithms for QUIC over LEO Satellite Networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on LEO Networking and Communication . 43–48

work page 2024

[8] [8]

Mohamed M Kassem, Aravindh Raman, Diego Perino, and Nishanth Sastry. 2022. A browser-side view of starlink connectivity. In Proceed- ings of the 22nd ACM Internet Measurement Conference . 151–158

work page 2022