Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 104 references

Multi-plateau high-harmonic generation in liquids driven by off-site recombination

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Liquid high-harmonic generation shows a second plateau, and the paper argues it comes from electrons that recombine with molecules at the second solvation shell rather than at the molecule that released them.

desk verdict Solid experimental discovery of a second plateau in liquid HHG, with a plausible but unproven NNN recombination mechanism; the observation warrants peer review, the mechanism needs more evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.23945 v1 pith:MGVN6FWT submitted 2025-06-30 physics.chem-ph physics.atm-clusphysics.atom-phphysics.optics

Angana Mondal , Ofer Neufeld , Tadas Balciunas , Benedikt Waser , Serge Müller , Mariana Rossi , Zhong Yin , Angel Rubio
show 2 more authors
Nicolas Tancogne-Dejean Hans Jakob Wörner
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.chem-phphysics.atm-clusphysics.atom-phphysics.optics
keywords high-harmonicgenerationliquidphasesecondplateauoff-siterecombinationsolvationshellellipticitydependencetime-dependentdensityfunctionaltheorysemiclassicaltrajectories
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Driving liquids with intense mid-infrared laser pulses produces high harmonics — photons at multiples of the laser frequency. Earlier work found that, unlike gases and solids, liquids show a first harmonic plateau whose cutoff barely moves when the laser intensity or wavelength changes, leaving it unclear where the additional absorbed energy goes. This paper reports the answer: a second, much weaker plateau appears about 5 eV beyond the first cutoff, roughly two to three orders of magnitude down in yield, in water, heavy water, ethanol, and propanol. Combining experiments, ab initio cluster simulations, and semiclassical electron-trajectory models, the authors show that this second plateau is dominated by electrons that recombine not at the molecule that released them but at a neighboring molecule — predominantly in the second solvation shell — and the same mechanism predicts yet higher plateaus. If this picture holds, the harmonic spectrum becomes a probe of how widely electrons delocalize in liquids and a ruler for intermolecular distances.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a real-space semiclassical trajectory model extended to off-site recombination, calibrated against ab initio cluster TDDFT simulations and time-frequency analysis. In this picture, electrons follow the three-step cycle — tunnel ionization, laser acceleration, recombination — but the return condition is imposed at the distance of the second solvation shell rather than at the parent molecule: $x(t_f) = x_{\mathrm{NNN}}$, with $x_{\mathrm{NNN}} \approx 5.3$ Å in water, while a mean free path of about 3.2 Å truncates the on-site trajectories that make the first plateau. This single modification produces the second plateau's energy range, its weak scaling of the cutoff with wavelength and intensity, and an approximate analytical cutoff law $E_c \approx 2 q E d_{\mathrm{NNN}} - \frac{m^2 \omega^4 d_{\mathrm{NNN}}^3}{q E}$. The complementary piece of machinery is the ellipticity response: the authors generalize the strong-field-approximation dipole model to a hole delocalized over several sites — a central Gaussian plus satellite Gaussians at the solvation-shell distance — which reproduces the multi-Gaussian ellipticity profiles and side peaks that experimentally distinguish second-plateau harmonics from first-plateau ones. Together, these tools single out next-nearest-neighbor recombination as the dominant second-plateau channel and tie that microscopic mechanism to the measured spectrum, which lets the authors rule out macroscopic phase-matching or propagation effects as the plateau's origin.

What would settle it

Measure the second-plateau cutoff while changing the liquid's density, temperature, or solvent so that the second-solvation-shell distance moves: the analytical law predicts $E_c$ shifts linearly with $d_{\mathrm{NNN}}$ (about $2 q E d_{\mathrm{NNN}}$ to first order in the field) and stays essentially independent of wavelength, so a quadratic wavelength dependence or a cutoff that fails to track the measured radial distribution function would rule out next-nearest-neighbor recombination. A complementary check is the ellipticity profile: if second-plateau harmonics ever show a single Gaussian with no side peaks, the off-site channel is not the mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that liquid-phase HHG contains a second plateau beyond the first, and that this plateau has a distinct microscopic origin. The authors argue — from the concurrence of experiment, cluster-based ab initio TDDFT simulation, time-frequency analysis, and an extended trajectory model — that the second plateau arises from electrons that tunnel-ionize, propagate a mean-free-path-limited distance, and coherently recombine not at the parent molecule but at a neighboring molecule, predominantly at the second solvation shell (the next-nearest-neighbor site, at roughly 5.3 Å in water). The first plateau is governed by on-site recombination of mean-free-path-limited short trajectories; the inter-plateau decay region is fed by recombination at the first solvation shell and by suppressed longer on-site trajectories; back-scattered and free gas-like trajectories are inconsistent with the measured energy range, scaling, and time-frequency data. The signature that singles out next-nearest-neighbor recombination is the anomalous ellipticity dependence of second-plateau harmonics — a multi-Gaussian profile with side peaks that grow with harmonic energy, reproduced by an extended strong-field-approximation model with a delocalized hole — together with a cutoff that scales weakly with wavelength and intensity. The paper also derives an approximate analytical cutoff law for off-site recombination, linear in the field and wavelength-independent to first order, and reports ab initio predictions of a third plateau that the experiment cannot yet resolve.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim stands on the finite-cluster TDDFT model reproducing the bulk liquid's harmonic response down to the roughly one-thousandth yield level of the second plateau (frozen nuclei, no independent benchmark at that weakness), and on laser-driven holes being delocalized widely enough to recombine at the second solvation shell even though equilibrium snapshots show the hole-carrying orbital localized on one molecule.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The missing higher-order nonlinear response in liquid HHG is not absent: it appears as an exponentially suppressed second plateau, about 500 times weaker, whose cutoff grows only weakly with laser intensity and wavelength.
  • The second-plateau cutoff and ellipticity side peaks encode the second-solvation-shell distance, so liquid HHG spectra become a way to extract effective intermolecular separations.
  • Because the mechanism depends on holes being delocalized across neighboring molecules, liquid HHG can act as a probe of electronic wavefunction delocalization and of hybridization between solute and solvent states.
  • The same trajectory picture predicts even higher plateaus from recombination at further solvation shells, implying a ladder of exponentially suppressed nonlinear responses.
  • Since the second plateau is a microscopic effect, similar plateaus should appear in other disordered phases with short-range order, such as amorphous solids.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the analytical cutoff law implies a direct test the paper does not perform — varying density, temperature, or solvent to shift the second-solvation-shell distance should move the second cutoff linearly in field strength while leaving it wavelength-independent.
  • Inference: the requirement of wide hole delocalization suggests solutes that strongly hybridize with the solvent (ions, hydrogen-bonded chromophores) should display enhanced or displaced second-plateau emission, an expectation the authors state only qualitatively.
  • Inference: the predicted third plateau could be sought with higher dynamic-range detection or by spectrally blocking the intense lower harmonics; its measured cutoff would test the multi-shell ladder beyond the second shell.
  • Inference: the tension between localized equilibrium HOMO states and the invoked dynamic hole delocalization could be settled by time-resolved hole-migration simulations or pump-probe experiments that track whether off-site recombination follows the hole's spreading after ionization.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the experimental observation of a second plateau in high-harmonic generation (HHG) from liquid water (H2O and D2O), ethanol, and isopropanol at 1500-1800 nm, with a yield roughly two to three orders of magnitude below the first plateau. This second plateau is also reproduced by ab initio TDDFT cluster calculations for liquid water, ammonia, and methane. The authors attribute the second plateau to electrons that recombine at the second solvation shell (next-nearest-neighbor, NNN) rather than at the ionization site, based on semiclassical trajectory analysis, time-frequency maps, and ellipticity-dependent measurements. An extended Lewenstein model with a delocalized hole is used to support the ellipticity side peaks, and a third plateau is predicted by the ab initio simulations.

Significance. If the mechanism claim holds, this would establish off-site (NNN) recombination as a distinct and observable HHG channel in liquids, opening a route to attosecond probing of electron dynamics and electronic delocalization in solutions and disordered media. The paper has substantial strengths: the experimental observation of the second plateau is documented in multiple liquids, it is independently reproduced by ab initio TDDFT across several systems, and the predicted weak wavelength and intensity scaling is confirmed in both experiment and theory. The ellipticity side peaks are a falsifiable signature that is reproduced by the ab initio data. However, the mechanistic attribution to NNN recombination relies on semiclassical trajectories with a manually adjusted time shift and an assumed delocalized hole, and the ab initio spectra are not decomposed into on-site versus off-site recombination channels. These gaps make the central 'dominated by NNN recombination' claim stronger than the present evidence.

major comments (4)
  1. [II (Fig. 3) and Methods, 'Semi-classical trajectory simulations'] The assignment of the second plateau to NNN recombination is largely based on semiclassical trajectories whose agreement with the ab initio time-frequency maps is obtained with a manually applied time-axis shift of ~0.1T and still leaves a ~3 eV discrepancy for water (main text; Methods). Because the recombination distance (5.3 Å) is chosen from the edge of the second peak of the radial distribution and the time shift is fitted to the numerics, the energy-range agreement is not an independent confirmation. The authors should vary the effective mass and NNN distance over physically plausible ranges and show that the NNN energy window and the conclusions are stable; otherwise the identification of the dominant trajectory family is underdetermined.
  2. [SM S1, Table I; main text, 'Lastly, we consider...' and Fig. 4] The proposed mechanism requires a delocalized hole with significant amplitude at the second solvation shell, but the molecular-dynamics snapshots in SM S1 show that the HOMO (the hole state) is localized with a spread of about 2 Å, while only the LUMO is delocalized (~9.5 Å). The main text invokes 'wide hole delocalization' due to laser driving and ionization, but no time-dependent hole calculation is presented. The extended Lewenstein model in SM S3 does not fill this gap: it simply assumes Gaussian centers at 5.5 Å with relative weight β = 0.01, thereby placing the NNN amplitude into the model by hand. The ellipticity side peaks are therefore a consequence of this assumption, not an independent verification. The authors should provide direct evidence of laser-induced hole delocalization (e.g., time-resolved hole density from TDDFT) or explicitly state that the NNN recombination amplitude is a free parameter.
  3. [II, after Fig. 1(d)] The statement that the cluster TDDFT calculation 'allows us to rule out macroscopic effects' as the origin of the second plateau is too strong. The finite-cluster simulation demonstrates that a purely microscopic mechanism can produce a second plateau, which is an important existence proof, but it does not exclude a macroscopic contribution (e.g., phase matching, reabsorption, or propagation) to the experimentally measured 10^-3-level yield. Ruling out macroscopic effects would require a propagation calculation or a thickness-dependent measurement; the manuscript should either provide such evidence or weaken this claim.
  4. [II and SM S3] The central claim that the second plateau is 'dominated' by NNN recombination is not directly extracted from the ab initio data. The TDDFT spectra are total harmonic yields and are not decomposed into on-site, NN, and NNN recombination contributions. The extended Lewenstein model (SM S3) is not a decomposition of the TDDFT result; it reproduces side-peak shapes only after choosing the NNN weight, spread, and number of centers. To support 'dominated', the authors should provide a quantitative site-decomposed analysis (e.g., projecting the time-dependent dipole onto recombinations at different solvation shells) or, failing that, soften the claim to 'consistent with' rather than 'dominated by'.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The word 'propranol' should read 'isopropanol' (or '2-propanol'); the experimental liquid is isopropanol, as shown in Extended Data Fig. 1.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption contains a duplicated phrase: 'showing the showing the temporal dependence'.
  3. [SM S3, Figs. S5 and S6] The axis label 'Ellip � city' is garbled and should be 'Ellipticity'.
  4. [Methods, last paragraph] There is a typo in 'for the the elliptically-driven case' in the description of the Lewenstein-like SFA model.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Second-plateau observation is independent, but the NNN mechanism is confirmed partly by fitted inputs (d_NNN, time shift) and by a Lewenstein model whose off-site centers are the very assumption being tested.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Methods: Semi-classical trajectory simulations; Results (NNN trajectories paragraph)]
    "The NNN distance was taken as the edge of the second broad peak of the distribution function at ∼5.3 Å. The MFP in water was taken to be ∼3.2 Å. The time axis was shifted by ∼0.1T in each case to compensate for potential effective-mass effects that were not taken into consideration, and to obtain better agreement between the semi-classical theory and ab-initio simulations."

    The trajectory model is not a parameter-free predictor of the second-plateau energy: the NNN recombination distance is selected within the 4–5.5 Å shell and the emission-time axis is shifted by ~0.1T specifically to match the ab initio time-frequency plots. The subsequent statement that NNN trajectories 'account for the correct energy range in the second plateau' therefore reports the consequences of the chosen inputs rather than an independent confirmation of NNN dominance.

  2. self definitional [Supporting Information S3: Extended Lewenstein-like model]
    "We now assume that the bound state, here the HOMO of the liquid, is composed of multiple Gaussians ... one main central Gaussian at the origin, and N surrounding identical centers with a lesser weight and a smaller spread ... We place here 3 surrounding Gaussian at a distance of 5.5 Å around the central Gaussian, corresponding to the second solvation shell of liquid water, with β = 0.01, and σ = 0.025 ... Figure S6 shows that the delocalization of the hole leads to side peaks ... This result thus mimicks the experimentally observed data in Fig. 4 ..."

    The side peaks are generated by explicitly placing recombination centers at 5.5 Å with amplitude β=0.01; a single-Gaussian model (Fig. S5) has no side peaks. Thus the 'prediction' of side peaks is the assumed off-site recombination itself, and using S3 to 'confirm our interpretation' is a definitional loop. The parameter set is also an ansatz: the HOMO from MD (SM S1) is well-localized (~2 Å), so the multi-center HOMO is not derived from the cited evidence.

full rationale

The existence of the second plateau is not circular: it is independently observed in raw spectra across four liquids and reproduced by ab initio TDDFT cluster simulations, so the central observation is externally grounded. However, the assignment of that plateau to next-nearest-neighbor (NNN) off-site recombination is supported partly by fitted semi-classical inputs (d_NNN chosen at 5.3 Å, MFP 3.2 Å, and an artificial ~0.1T time shift) and by an extended Lewenstein model whose multi-center HOMO with β=0.01 at 5.5 Å is precisely the NNN mechanism being claimed. The time-frequency 'agreement' is explicitly non-quantitative (3 eV missing in water, time axis artificially shifted), and the ellipticity side-peak confirmation is a self-consistency check: remove the off-site centers and the side peaks disappear. The paper also justifies hole delocalization by MD, but SM S1 reports HOMO first moment ~2 Å (localized) and only LUMO delocalized (~9.5 Å), so the 'wide hole delocalization' required for NNN recombination is an unverified assumption, later asserted to arise 'where laser driving and ionization create coherent holes throughout the liquid'. These are fitted or premise-laden steps, not independent tests. No penalty is taken for the cluster-TDDFT self-citation (Ref. [73]), which is public code and an independent computational method. Overall: observation independent, mechanistic attribution partially circular, so score 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central observation (second plateau) rests on experimental measurement and ab-initio TDDFT. The mechanistic interpretation rests on the semiclassical trajectory model with several structural and fitted parameters (NNN distance, time shift, effective mass, Lewenstein parameters), plus the domain assumptions of frozen nuclei, cluster validity, and laser-induced hole delocalization.

free parameters (6)
  • Time-axis shift for NNN trajectories = ~0.1T (~0.1 optical cycle)
    Artificially shifted to optimally match ab-initio time-frequency plots (Methods, Semi-classical trajectory simulations).
  • Lewenstein model weight beta = 0.01
    Weight of surrounding Gaussians in the multi-Gaussian hole model, chosen to reproduce the ellipticity side peaks (SM S3).
  • Lewenstein model spread sigma = 0.025
    Relative spread of surrounding Gaussians, chosen to match the observed ellipticity dependence (SM S3).
  • Electron effective mass in semiclassical model = 1 (unity)
    Assumed unity; stated in Methods, Semi-classical trajectory simulations.
  • NNN recombination distance = 5.3 Å
    Taken as the edge of the second broad peak of the O-O radial distribution function; a structural input, not fitted to HHG, but a model parameter.
  • MFP in water = 3.2 Å
    Mean free path from prior work used to restrict on-site trajectories; input to the semiclassical model.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Strong-field approximation: the ionic potential is neglected during continuum propagation (Eq. 1)
    Standard SFA used for trajectory analysis in gases; cited in Methods.
  • domain assumption Nuclei remain frozen during the laser pulse
    Stated in Methods as valid on femtosecond timescales; used in all TDDFT simulations.
  • domain assumption Finite cluster TDDFT reproduces the bulk liquid HHG response
    Follows Ref. [73]; used to rule out macroscopic effects.
  • domain assumption Hole delocalization over neighboring molecules under strong driving permits off-site recombination
    Inferred from MD snapshots showing LUMO delocalization and invoked as a dynamic effect; static HOMO is localized.
  • domain assumption The first and second peaks of the O-O radial distribution function define NN and NNN recombination sites
    Used to set distances 2.8 Å and 5.3 Å in the trajectory model.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-plateau high-harmonic generation in liquids driven by off-site recombination." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MGVN6FWT

@misc{pith2026250623945,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-plateau high-harmonic generation in liquids driven by off-site recombination},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MGVN6FWT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.23945}
}
read the original abstract

Non-perturbative high-harmonic generation (HHG) has recently been observed in the liquid phase, where it was demonstrated to have a different physical mechanism compared to gas and solid phases of matter. The currently best physical picture for liquid HHG eliminates scattered-electron contributions and identifies on-site recombination as the dominant contributor. This mechanism accurately predicts the cut-off energy and its independence of the driving laser wavelength and intensity. However, this implies that additional energy absorbed in the liquid as the driving laser intensity is increased does not result in higher-order non-linearities, which is in contrast to the conventional expectation from most nonlinear media. Here we experimentally observe the formation of a second plateau in HHG from multiple liquids (water, heavy water, propranol, and ethanol), thus explaining the conundrum of the missing higher-order response. We analyze this second plateau with a combination of experimental, state-of-the-art ab-initio numerical (in diverse systems of water, ammonia, and liquid methane), and semi-classical analytical, techniques, and elucidate its physical origin to electrons that recombine on neighboring water molecules rather than at the ionization site, leading to unique HHG ellipticity dependence. Remarkably, we find that the second plateau is dominated by electrons recombining at the second solvation shell, relying on wide hole delocalization. Theory also predicts the appearance of even higher plateaus, indicating a general trend. Our work establishes new physical phenomena in the highly non-linear optical response of liquids, paving the way to attosecond probing of electron dynamics in solutions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.23945 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    McPherson, G

    A. McPherson, G. Gibson, H. Jara, U. Johann, T. S. Luk, I. A. McIntyre, K. Boyer, and C. K. Rhodes, Stud- ies of multiphoton production of vacuum-ultraviolet ra- diation in the rare gases, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 4, 595 (1987)

    1987

  2. [2]

    Ferray, A

    M. Ferray, A. L’Huillier, X. F. Li, L. A. Lompre, G. Mainfray, and C. Manus, Multiple-harmonic con- version of 1064 nm radiation in rare gases, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 21, L31 (1988)

    1988

  3. [3]

    Ghimire, A

    S. Ghimire, A. D. Dichiara, E. Sistrunk, P. Agostini, L. F. Dimauro, and D. A. Reis, Observation of high- order harmonic generation in a bulk crystal, Nature Physics 7, 138 (2011)

    2011

  4. [5]

    P. M. Paul, E. S. Toma, P. Breger, G. Mullot, F. Aug´ e, P. Balcou, H. G. Muller, and P. Agostini, Observation of a train of attosecond pulses from high harmonic gen- eration, Science 292, 1689 (2001)

    2001

  5. [6]

    Popmintchev, M.-C

    T. Popmintchev, M.-C. Chen, D. Popmintchev, P. Arpin, S. Brown, S. Alisauskas, G. Andriukaitis, T. Balciunas, O. D. Mucke, A. Pugzlys, A. Baltuska, B. Shim, S. E. Schrauth, A. Gaeta, C. Hernandez- Garcia, L. Plaja, A. Becker, A. Jaron-Becker, M. M. Murnane, and H. C. Kapteyn, Bright Coherent Ultra- high Harmonics in the keV X-ray Regime from Mid- Infrared...

    2012

  6. [7]

    Vampa, T

    G. Vampa, T. Hammond, N. Thir´ e, B. Schmidt, F. L´ egar´ e, C. McDonald, T. Brabec, and P. Corkum, Linking high harmonics from gases and solids, Nature 522, 462 (2015)

    2015

  7. [8]

    T. T. Luu, Z. Yin, A. Jain, T. Gaumnitz, Y. Per- tot, J. Ma, and H. J. W¨ orner, Extreme–ultraviolet high–harmonic generation in liquids, Nature Commu- nications 9, 3723 (2018)

    2018

  8. [9]

    Mondal, O

    A. Mondal, O. Neufeld, Z. Yin, Z. Nourbakhsh, V. Svo- boda, A. Rubio, N. Tancogne-Dejean, and H. J. W¨ orner, High-harmonic spectroscopy of low-energy electron- scattering dynamics in liquids, Nature Physics 19, 1813 (2023)

    2023

Show all 104 references
  1. [10]

    C. P. Schmid, L. Weigl, P. Gr¨ ossing, V. Junk, C. Gorini, S. Schlauderer, S. Ito, M. Meierhofer, N. Hofmann, D. Afanasiev, J. Crewse, K. A. Kokh, O. E. Tereshchenko, J. G¨ udde, F. Evers, J. Wilhelm, K. Richter, U. H¨ ofer, and R. Huber, Tunable non-integer high-harmonic gene...

    2021

  2. [11]

    Bauer and K

    D. Bauer and K. K. Hansen, High-harmonic generation in solids with and without topological edge states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 177401 (2018)

    2018

  3. [12]

    Theidel, V

    D. Theidel, V. Cotte, R. Sondenheimer, V. Shiriaeva, M. Froidevaux, V. Severin, A. Merdji-Larue, P. Mosel, S. Fr¨ ohlich, K.-A. Weber, U. Morgner, M. Kovacev, J. Biegert, and H. Merdji, Evidence of the quantum opti- cal nature of high-harmonic generation, PRX Quantum 5, 040319...

    2024

  4. [13]

    Alcal` a, U

    J. Alcal` a, U. Bhattacharya, J. Biegert, M. Ciappina, U. Elu, T. Graß, P. T. Grochowski, M. Lewenstein, A. Palau, T. P. H. Sidiropoulos, T. Steinle, and I. Tyul- nev, High-harmonic spectroscopy of quantum phase transitions in a high-tc superconductor, Proceedings of the Natio...

    2022

  5. [14]

    Uchida, G

    K. Uchida, G. Mattoni, S. Yonezawa, F. Nakamura, Y. Maeno, and K. Tanaka, High-order harmonic gen- eration and its unconventional scaling law in the mott- insulating ca2ruo4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 127401 (2022)

    2022

  6. [15]

    Y.-Y. Lv, J. Xu, S. Han, C. Zhang, Y. Han, J. Zhou, S.-H. Yao, X.-P. Liu, M.-H. Lu, H. Weng, Z. Xie, Y. B. Chen, J. Hu, Y.-F. Chen, and S. Zhu, High-harmonic generation in weyl semimetal ˆ ı ²-wp2 crystals, Nature Communications 12, 6437 (2021)

    2021

  7. [16]

    Neufeld, N

    O. Neufeld, N. Tancogne-Dejean, H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, and A. Rubio, Are there universal signatures of topological phases in high-harmonic gen- eration? probably not., Phys. Rev. X 13, 031011 (2023)

    2023

  8. [17]

    Y. Yang, J. Lu, A. Manjavacas, T. S. Luk, H. Liu, K. Kelley, J.-P. Maria, E. L. Runnerstrom, M. B. Sin- clair, S. Ghimire, and I. Brener, High-harmonic genera- tion from an epsilon-near-zero material, Nature Physics 15, 1022 (2019)

    2019

  9. [18]

    Orthodoxou, A

    C. Orthodoxou, A. Za ¨ ır, and G. H. Booth, High har- monic generation in two-dimensional mott insulators, npj Quantum Materials 6, 76 (2021)

    2021

  10. [19]

    Habibovi´ c, K

    D. Habibovi´ c, K. R. Hamilton, O. Neufeld, and L. Rego, Emerging tailored light sources for studying chirality and symmetry, Nature Reviews Physics 6, 663 (2024)

    2024

  11. [20]

    P. B. Corkum, Plasma perspective on strong field mul- tiphoton ionization, Physical Review Letters 71, 1994 (1993)

    1993

  12. [21]

    Lewenstein, P

    M. Lewenstein, P. Balcou, M. Y. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high-harmonic genera- tion by low-frequency laser fields, Physical Review A 49, 2117 (1994)

    1994

  13. [22]

    P. B. Corkum and F. Krausz, Attosecond science, Na- ture Physics 3, 381 (2007)

    2007

  14. [23]

    Calegari, G

    F. Calegari, G. Sansone, S. Stagira, C. Vozzi, and M. Nisoli, Advances in attosecond science, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 49, 062001 (2016)

    2016

  15. [24]

    P. M. Kraus, B. Mignolet, D. Baykusheva, A. Ru- penyan, L. Horn´ y, E. F. Penka, G. Grassi, O. I. Tol- stikhin, J. Schneider, F. Jensen, L. B. Madsen, A. D. Bandrauk, F. Remacle, and H. J. W¨ orner, Measurement and laser control of attosecond charge migration in ion- ized iodo...

    2015

  16. [25]

    Pertot, C

    Y. Pertot, C. Schmidt, M. Matthews, A. Chauvet, M. Huppert, V. Svoboda, A. von Conta, A. Tehlar, D. Baykusheva, J.-P. P. Wolf, and H. J. W¨ orner, Time- resolved x-ray absorption spectroscopy with a water window high-harmonic source, Science 355, 264 (2017)

    2017

  17. [26]

    Yin, Y.-P

    Z. Yin, Y.-P. Chang, T. Balˇ ci¯ unas, Y. Shakya, A. Djorovi´ c, G. Gaulier, G. Fazio, R. Santra, L. In- hester, J.-P. Wolf, et al., Femtosecond proton transfer in urea solutions probed by x-ray spectroscopy, Nature 619, 749 (2023)

    2023

  18. [27]

    C. Wang, M. D. Waters, P. Zhang, J. Suchan, V. Svo- boda, T. T. Luu, C. Perry, Z. Yin, P. Slav ´ ıˇ cek, and H. J. W¨ orner, Different timescales during ultrafast stil- bene isomerization in the gas and liquid phases revealed using time-resolved photoelectron spectroscopy, Natu...

    2022

  19. [28]

    Kneller, C

    O. Kneller, C. Mor, N. D. Klimkin, N. Yaffe, M. Kr¨ uger, D. Azoury, A. J. Uzan-Narovlansky, Y. Federman, D. Rajak, B. D. Bruner, O. Smirnova, S. Patchkovskii, Y. Mairesse, M. Ivanov, and N. Dudovich, At- tosecond transient interferometry, Nature Photonics 10.1038/s41566-024-01...

    2024 doi

  20. [29]

    Y. Yang, R. E. Mainz, G. M. Rossi, F. Scheiba, M. A. Silva-Toledo, P. D. Keathley, G. Cirmi, and F. X. K¨ artner, Strong-field coherent control of isolated at- tosecond pulse generation, Nature Communications 12, 6641 (2021)

    2021

  21. [30]

    Wituschek, L

    A. Wituschek, L. Bruder, E. Allaria, U. Bangert, M. Binz, R. Borghes, C. Callegari, G. Cerullo, P. Cin- quegrana, L. Giannessi, et al., Tracking attosecond elec- tronic coherences using phase-manipulated extreme ul- traviolet pulses, Nature communications 11, 883 (2020)

    2020

  22. [31]

    Hentschel, R

    M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, C. Spielmann, G. A. Rei- der, N. Milosevic, T. Brabec, P. Corkum, U. Heinz- mann, M. Drescher, and F. Krausz, Attosecond metrol- ogy, Nature 414, 509 (2001)

    2001

  23. [32]

    K. Zhao, Q. Zhang, M. Chini, Y. Wu, X. Wang, and Z. Chang, Tailoring a 67 attosecond pulse through ad- vantageous phase-mismatch, Optics Letters 37, 3891 (2012)

    2012

  24. [33]

    Gaumnitz, A

    T. Gaumnitz, A. Jain, Y. Pertot, M. Huppert, I. Jordan, F. Ardana-Lamas, and H. J. W¨ orner, Streaking of 43- attosecond soft-X-ray pulses generated by a passively CEP-stable mid-infrared driver, Opt. Express 25, 27506 (2017)

    2017

  25. [34]

    Ghimire, A

    S. Ghimire, A. D. DiChiara, E. Sistrunk, U. B. Szafruga, P. Agostini, L. F. DiMauro, and D. A. Reis, Redshift in the optical absorption of zno single crystals in the presence of an intense midinfrared laser field, Physical review letters 107, 167407 (2011)

    2011

  26. [35]

    T. T. Luu, M. Garg, S. Y. Kruchinin, A. Moulet, M. T. Hassan, and E. Goulielmakis, Extreme ultravi- olet high-harmonic spectroscopy of solids, Nature 521, 498 (2015)

    2015

  27. [36]

    Ghimire and D

    S. Ghimire and D. A. Reis, High-harmonic generation from solids, Nature physics 15, 10 (2019)

    2019

  28. [37]

    Goulielmakis and T

    E. Goulielmakis and T. Brabec, High harmonic gener- ation in condensed matter, Nature Photonics 16, 411 (2022)

    2022

  29. [38]

    Yue and M

    L. Yue and M. B. Gaarde, Introduction to theory of high-harmonic generation in solids: tutorial, Journal of the Optical Society of America B 39, 535 (2022)

    2022

  30. [39]

    Vampa, C

    G. Vampa, C. R. McDonald, G. Orlando, P. B. Corkum, and T. Brabec, Semiclassical analysis of high harmonic generation in bulk crystals, Physical Review B 91, 064302 (2015)

    2015

  31. [40]

    M. Wu, D. A. Browne, K. J. Schafer, and M. B. Gaarde, Multilevel perspective on high-order harmonic genera- tion in solids, Phys. Rev. A 94, 063403 (2016)

    2016

  32. [41]

    Yue and M

    L. Yue and M. B. Gaarde, Imperfect recollisions in high- harmonic generation in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 153204 (2020)

    2020

  33. [42]

    E. N. Osika, A. Chac´ on, L. Ortmann, N. Su´ arez, J. A. P´ erez-Hern´ andez, B. Szafran, M. F. Ciappina, F. Sols, A. S. Landsman, and M. Lewenstein, Wannier-bloch ap- proach to localization in high-harmonics generation in solids, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021017 (2017). 12

    2017

  34. [43]

    Y. S. You, D. A. A. Reis, and S. Ghimire, Anisotropic high-harmonic generation in bulk crystals, Nature Physics 13, 345 (2017)

    2017

  35. [44]

    M. M. S., A. Pattanayak, M. Ivanov, and G. Dixit, Di- rect numerical observation of real-space recollision in high-order harmonic generation from solids, Phys. Rev. A 100, 043420 (2019)

    2019

  36. [45]

    G. G. Brown, A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, R. E. F. Silva, and M. Ivanov, Real-space perspective on dephasing in solid- state high harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043005 (2024)

    2024

  37. [46]

    G. G. Brown, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, R. E. F. Silva, and M. Ivanov, Ultrafast dephasing in solid-state high har- monic generation: macroscopic origin revealed by real- space dynamics Invited , J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 41, B40 (2024)

    2024

  38. [47]

    A. M. Parks, G. Ernotte, A. Thorpe, C. R. McDon- ald, P. B. Corkum, M. Taucer, and T. Brabec, Wannier quasi-classical approach to high harmonic generation in semiconductors, Optica 7, 1764 (2020)

    2020

  39. [48]

    Y. S. You, E. Cunningham, D. A. Reis, and S. Ghimire, Probing periodic potential of crystals via strong-field re- scattering, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 51, 114002 (2018)

    2018

  40. [49]

    C.-M. Wang, N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. Altarelli, A. Ru- bio, and S. A. Sato, Role of electron scattering on the high-order harmonic generation from solids, Physical Review Research 2, 033333 (2020)

    2020

  41. [50]

    R. Zuo, A. Trautmann, G. Wang, W.-R. Hannes, S. Yang, X. Song, T. Meier, M. Ciappina, H. T. Duc, and W. Yang, Neighboring Atom Collisions in Solid-State High Harmonic Generation, Ultrafast Sci- ence 2021, 10.34133/2021/9861923 (2021)

    2021 doi

  42. [51]

    L. Li, P. Lan, X. Zhu, T. Huang, Q. Zhang, M. Lein, and P. Lu, Reciprocal-Space-Trajectory Perspective on High-Harmonic Generation in Solids, Physical Review Letters 122, 193901 (2019)

    2019

  43. [52]

    L. Li, P. Lan, X. Zhu, and P. Lu, Huygens-fresnel picture for high harmonic generation in solids, Physical review letters 127, 223201 (2021)

    2021

  44. [53]

    T. T. Luu and H. J. W¨ orner, Measurement of the berry curvature of solids using high-harmonic spectroscopy, Nature Communications 9, 916 (2018)

    2018

  45. [54]

    A. J. Uzan, G. Orenstein, A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, C. Mc- Donald, R. E. F. Silva, B. D. Bruner, N. D. Klimkin, V. Blanchet, T. Arusi-Parpar, M. Kr¨ uger, A. N. Rubtsov, O. Smirnova, M. Ivanov, B. Yan, T. Brabec, and N. Dudovich, Attosecond spectral singularities in solid-state hi...

    2020

  46. [55]

    C. Yu, H. Iravani, and L. B. Madsen, Crystal- momentum-resolved contributions to multiple plateaus of high-order harmonic generation from band-gap ma- terials, Phys. Rev. A 102, 033105 (2020)

    2020

  47. [57]

    Y. S. You, Y. Yin, Y. Wu, A. Chew, X. Ren, F. Zhuang, S. Gholam-Mirzaei, M. Chini, Z. Chang, and S. Ghimire, High-harmonic generation in amorphous solids, Nature communications 8, 1 (2017)

    2017

  48. [58]

    Y. S. You, M. Wu, Y. Yin, A. Chew, X. Ren, S. Gholam- Mirzaei, D. A. Browne, M. Chini, Z. Chang, K. J. Schafer, M. B. Gaarde, and S. Ghimire, Laser wave- form control of extreme ultraviolet high harmonics from solids, Optics Letters 42, 1816 (2017)

    2017

  49. [59]

    Ikemachi, Y

    T. Ikemachi, Y. Shinohara, T. Sato, J. Yumoto, M. Kuwata-Gonokami, and K. L. Ishikawa, Trajectory analysis of high-order-harmonic generation from peri- odic crystals, Phys. Rev. A 95, 043416 (2017)

    2017

  50. [60]

    Luppi and E

    E. Luppi and E. Coccia, Role of inner molecular orbitals in high-harmonic generation spectra of aligned uracil, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 127, 7335 (2023), pMID: 37640677

    2023

  51. [61]

    Morassut, A

    C. Morassut, A. Ravindran, A. Ciavardini, E. Luppi, G. De Ninno, and E. Coccia, High-harmonic generation spectroscopy of gas-phase bromoform, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 128, 2015 (2024)

    2024

  52. [62]

    Neufeld, N

    O. Neufeld, N. Tancogne-Dejean, and A. Rubio, Bench- marking functionals for strong-field light-matter inter- actions in adiabatic time-dependent density functional theory, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 15, 7254 (2024)

    2024

  53. [63]

    S. C. Rae, X. Chen, and K. Burnett, Saturation of har- monic generation in one- and three-dimensional atoms, Phys. Rev. A 50, 1946 (1994)

    1994

  54. [64]

    S. C. Rae and K. Burnett, Calculations of high-order- harmonic generation in the strongly ionizing regime, Phys. Rev. A 48, 2490 (1993)

    1993

  55. [65]

    Constant, D

    E. Constant, D. Garzella, P. Breger, E. M´ evel, C. Dor- rer, C. Le Blanc, F. Salin, and P. Agostini, Optimiz- ing high harmonic generation in absorbing gases: Model and experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1668 (1999)

    1999

  56. [66]

    C. A. Schouder, A. S. Chatterley, J. D. Pickering, and H. Stapelfeldt, Laser-induced coulomb explosion imag- ing of aligned molecules and molecular dimers, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry 73, 323 (2022)

    2022

  57. [67]

    J. P. Farrell, L. S. Spector, B. K. McFarland, P. H. Bucksbaum, M. G¨ uhr, M. B. Gaarde, and K. J. Schafer, Influence of phase matching on the Cooper minimum in Ar high-order harmonic spectra, Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 83, 1 (2011), arXiv:1011.1297

    2011 arXiv

  58. [68]

    Zeng and X.-B

    A.-W. Zeng and X.-B. Bian, Impact of statistical fluc- tuations on high harmonic generation in liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 203901 (2020)

    2020

  59. [70]

    Li, J.-X

    Z.-L. Li, J.-X. Chen, Z.-W. Ding, J.-Q. Liu, Y.-B. Wang, and X.-B. Bian, Linking high-order harmonic generation and radial distribution function in liquids, Phys. Rev. A 110, 043507 (2024)

    2024

  60. [71]

    Alexander, J

    O. Alexander, J. C. T. Barnard, E. W. Larsen, T. Avni, S. Jarosch, C. Ferchaud, A. Gregory, S. Parker, G. Gali- nis, A. Tofful, D. Garratt, M. R. Matthews, and J. P. Marangos, Observation of recollision-based high- harmonic generation in liquid isopropanol and the role of elect...

    2023

  61. [72]

    X. Gong, S. Heck, D. Jelovina, C. Perry, K. Zinchenko, R. Lucchese, and H. J. W¨ orner, Attosecond spec- troscopy of size-resolved water clusters, Nature 609, 507 (2022). 13

    2022

  62. [73]

    Neufeld, Z

    O. Neufeld, Z. Nourbakhsh, N. Tancogne-Dejean, and A. Rubio, Ab initio cluster approach for high harmonic generation in liquids, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 18, 4117 (2022)

    2022

  63. [74]

    Z. Yin, T. T. Luu, and H. J. W¨ orner, Few-cycle high- harmonic generation in liquids: in-operando thickness measurement of flat microjets, Journal of Physics: Pho- tonics 2, 044007 (2020)

    2020

  64. [75]

    Chang, Z

    Y.-P. Chang, Z. Yin, T. Balciunas, H. J. W¨ orner, and J.-P. Wolf, Temperature measurements of liquid flat jets in vacuum, Structural Dynamics 9, 014901 (2022)

    2022

  65. [76]

    Buttersack, H

    T. Buttersack, H. Haak, H. Bluhm, U. Hergenhahn, G. Meijer, and B. Winter, Imaging temperature and thickness of thin planar liquid water jets in vacuum, Structural Dynamics 10, 034901 (2023)

    2023

  66. [77]

    Svoboda, Z

    V. Svoboda, Z. Yin, T. T. Luu, and H. J. W¨ orner, Po- larization measurements of deep-to extreme-ultraviolet high harmonics generated in liquid flat sheets, Optics Express 29, 30799 (2021)

    2021

  67. [78]

    Mondal, B

    A. Mondal, B. Waser, T. Balciunas, O. Neufeld, Z. Yin, N. Tancogne-Dejean, A. Rubio, and H. J. W¨ orner, High- harmonic generation in liquids with few-cycle pulses: ef- fect of laser-pulse duration on the cut-off energy, Optics Express 31, 34348 (2023)

    2023

  68. [79]

    R. C. Hardy and R. L. Cottington, Viscosity of deu- terium oxide and water in the range 5 to 125 c, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand 42, 573 (1949)

    1949

  69. [80]

    Baker, J

    S. Baker, J. S. Robinson, C. A. Haworth, H. Teng, R. A. Smith, C. C. Chiril˘ a, M. Lein, J. W. G. Tisch, and J. P. Marangos, Probing proton dynamics in molecules on an attosecond time scale, Science 312, 424 (2006)

    2006

  70. [81]

    M. A. L. Marques, N. T. Maitra, F. M. S. Nogueira, E. K. U. Gross, and A. Rubio, eds., Fundamentals of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory, 1st ed., Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 837 (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012) pp. XXXII, 559, published: 20 January 2012 (Softcove...

    2012

  71. [82]

    Tancogne-Dejean, M

    N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. J. T. Oliveira, X. Andrade, H. Appel, C. H. Borca, G. Le Breton, F. Buchholz, A. Castro, S. Corni, A. A. Correa, U. De Giovannini, A. Delgado, F. G. Eich, J. Flick, G. Gil, A. Gomez, N. Helbig, H. H¨ ubener, R. Jest¨ adt, J. Jornet-Somoza, A. H. Larsen, ...

    2020

  72. [83]

    M¨ oller, Y

    M. M¨ oller, Y. Cheng, S. D. Khan, B. Zhao, K. Zhao, M. Chini, G. G. Paulus, and Z. Chang, Dependence of high-order-harmonic-generation yield on driving-laser ellipticity, Phys. Rev. A 86, 011401 (2012)

    2012

  73. [84]

    Ferr´ e, A

    A. Ferr´ e, A. E. Boguslavskiy, M. Dagan, V. Blanchet, B. D. Bruner, F. Burgy, A. Camper, D. Descamps, B. Fabre, N. Fedorov, J. Gaudin, G. Geoffroy, J. Mikosch, S. Patchkovskii, S. Petit, T. Ruchon, H. Soifer, D. Staedter, I. Wilkinson, A. Stolow, N. Du- dovich, and Y. Mairesse...

    2015

  74. [85]

    C. Yu, U. Saalmann, and J. M. Rost, High-order har- monics from backscattering of delocalized electrons, Phys. Rev. A 105, L041101 (2022)

    2022

  75. [86]

    Prendergast, J

    D. Prendergast, J. C. Grossman, and G. Galli, The electronic structure of liquid water within density- functional theory, The Journal of Chemical Physics 123, 014501 (2005), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/jcp/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.1940612/15369007/014501 1 online.pdf

    2005 doi

  76. [87]

    A. K. Soper, The radial distribution functions of water as derived from radiation total scattering experiments: is there anything we can say for sure?, International Scholarly Research Notices 2013, 279463 (2013)

    2013

  77. [88]

    Baker, J

    S. Baker, J. S. Robinson, C. A. Haworth, H. Teng, R. A. Smith, C. C. Chirila, M. Lein, J. W. G. Tisch, and J. P. Marangos, Probing proton dynamics in molecules on an attosecond time scale, Science 312, 424 (2006)

    2006

  78. [89]

    Patchkovskii, Nuclear dynamics in polyatomic molecules and high-order harmonic generation, Phys

    S. Patchkovskii, Nuclear dynamics in polyatomic molecules and high-order harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 253602 (2009)

    2009

  79. [90]

    L. He, Q. Zhang, P. Lan, W. Cao, X. Zhu, C. Zhai, F. Wang, W. Shi, M. Li, X.-B. Bian, P. Lu, and A. D. Bandrauk, Monitoring ultrafast vibrational dy- namics of isotopic molecules with frequency modula- tion of high-order harmonics, Nature Communications 9, 1108 (2018)

    2018

  80. [91]

    Legrand, E

    C. Legrand, E. Suraud, and P.-G. Reinhard, Compar- ison of self-interaction-corrections for metal clusters, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 35, 1115 (2002)

    2002

  81. [97]

    V. Blum, R. Gehrke, F. Hanke, P. Havu, V. Havu, X. Ren, K. Reuter, and M. Scheffler, Ab initio molec- ular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals, Computer Physics Communications 180, 2175 (2009)

    2009

  82. [100]

    Lewenstein, P

    M. Lewenstein, P. Balcou, M. Y. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117 14 (1994). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Andreas Schneider and Mario Seiler for their contributions to the constr...

    1994

  83. [101]

    A derivative-based approach, and

  84. [102]

    double hump

    A piecewise linear fit intersection approach. This dual strategy accounts for variations in plateau shapes across different liquids and ensures consistency in identifying the cut-off even when the plateau is diffuse or compressed. In gas-phase HHG, a cut-off is conven- tionally defi...

  85. [103]

    Behler and M

    J. Behler and M. Parrinello, Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy sur- faces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007)

    2007

  86. [104]

    O’Neill, B

    N. O’Neill, B. X. Shi, K. Fong, A. Michaelides, and C. Schran, To pair or not to pair? machine-learned explicitly-correlated electronic structure for nacl in wa- ter, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 15, 6081 (2024)

    2024

  87. [105]

    Ceriotti, M

    M. Ceriotti, M. Parrinello, T. E. Markland, and D. E. Manolopoulos, Efficient stochastic thermostatting of path integral molecular dynamics, The Journal of chem- ical physics 133 (2010)

    2010

  88. [106]

    Litman, V

    Y. Litman, V. Kapil, Y. M. Feldman, D. Tisi, T. Beguˇ si´ c, K. Fidanyan, G. Fraux, J. Higer, M. Kellner, T. E. Li, et al., i-pi 3.0: a flexible, efficient framework for advanced atomistic simulations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15224 10 FIG. S13. Determination of the second plate...

    2024 arXiv

  89. [107]

    Schran, F

    C. Schran, F. L. Thiemann, P. Rowe, E. A. M¨ uller, O. Marsalek, and A. Michaelides, Machine learning po- tentials for complex aqueous systems made simple, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2110077118 (2021)

    2021

  90. [108]

    V. Blum, R. Gehrke, F. Hanke, P. Havu, V. Havu, X. Ren, K. Reuter, and M. Scheffler, Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals, Com- puter Physics Communications 180, 2175 (2009)

    2009

  91. [109]

    X. Gong, S. Heck, D. Jelovina, C. Perry, K. Zinchenko, R. Lucchese, and H. J. W¨ orner, Attosecond spectroscopy of size-resolved water clusters, Nature 609, 507 (2022)

    2022

  92. [110]

    Nourbakhsh, O

    Z. Nourbakhsh, O. Neufeld, N. Tancogne-Dejean, and A. Rubio, An ab initio supercell approach for high- harmonic generation in liquids (2022), arXiv:2212.04177

    2022 arXiv

  93. [111]

    Xu and S

    J. Xu and S. Meng, High-harmonic generation and femtosecond-resolved ultrafast dynamics in liquid wa- ter, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 16, 5295 (2025)

    2025

  94. [112]

    Lewenstein, P

    M. Lewenstein, P. Balcou, M. Y. Ivanov, A. L’Huillier, and P. B. Corkum, Theory of high-harmonic generation by low-frequency laser fields, Phys. Rev. A 49, 2117 (1994)

    1994

  95. [113]

    Ndabashimiye, S

    G. Ndabashimiye, S. Ghimire, M. Wu, D. A. Browne, K. J. Schafer, M. B. Gaarde, and D. A. Reis, Solid- state harmonics beyond the atomic limit, Nature 534, 10.1038/nature17660 (2016)

    2016 doi

  96. [114]

    T. T. Luu and H. J. W¨ orner, Measurement of the berry curvature of solids using high-harmonic spectroscopy, Na- ture Communications 9, 916 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.