Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 77 references

The Gaia-ESO Survey: Projected Rotational Velocities of B stars in the Carina Nebula

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives projected rotational velocities for 330 early-type stars in the Carina Nebula from the widths of two helium lines, reporting the first such measurements for 222 stars and for four of the region's clusters.

desk verdict Useful new vsini catalog for Carina B stars, but the 'first estimates for Trumpler 15' claim directly contradicts the paper's own introduction. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.00800 v1 pith:ZWUL4Z43 submitted 2025-07-01 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

W. Santos , S. Daflon , J. V. Sales Silva , K. Cunha , R. Blomme , T. Morel , A. Herrero , J. Maiz Apellániz
show 14 more authors
L. Mahy S. R. Berlanas T. Bensby A. Bragaglia F. Damiani A. Frasca G. Gilmore V. Kalari A. Lanzafame S. Randich S. Van Eck S. Zaggia L. O. Kerber O. J Katime Santrich
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords projectedrotationalvelocitiesBstarsCarinaNebulaopenclustersheliumlinewidthsGaia-ESOSurveystellarrotationNGC3293
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper measures how fast 330 young massive stars in the Carina Nebula are spinning by fitting Gaussian profiles to the helium lines at 4388 and 4471 Å and interpolating their widths in a grid of synthetic spectra. It reports the first rotation measurements for 222 of these stars, and the first ever for members of the clusters Trumpler 15, Collinder 228, Collinder 232, and Bochum 11. The resulting distribution peaks at 100–150 km/s, matching B stars in other Galactic clusters, but differs from field B stars, which rotate more slowly on average. For the hottest stars (B0–B3), the distribution is bimodal with peaks near 100 and 200 km/s plus a small excess near 350 km/s. The paper also finds that the oldest cluster, NGC 3293, has the highest median rotation speed, while Collinder 228 has the lowest, a pattern it links to environmental density and binary-driven spin-up.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is the FWHM-to-v sin i calibration grid of Daflon et al. (2007): synthetic He I 4388 and 4471 Å profiles computed with ATLAS9 LTE atmospheres plus non-LTE line formation (DETAIL and SURFACE), convolved with rotational and instrumental broadening for Teff = 15,000–30,000 K in 5,000 K steps, log g = 4.0, microturbulence 5 km/s, R = 10,000 and 50,000, and v sin i from 0 to 400 km/s in steps of 50 km/s. Observed Gaussian FWHMs are interpolated in this grid, and Gaia EDR3 astrometry (RUWE and 3-sigma parallax criteria) plus radial velocities measured from the same spectra are used to confirm cluster membership.

What would settle it

Compare v sin i from the He I width grid with Fourier-transform spectral fitting on the same stars; a systematic trend with v sin i, especially above about 200 km/s, would indicate that the grid's neglect of gravitational darkening and macroturbulence biases the high-rotation end. Separately, the bimodality in the B0–B3 distribution could be tested by applying the same FWHM method to a comparably sized independent sample of young cluster B stars and checking whether the two peaks reappear at the same velocities.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central result is a catalog of projected rotational velocities for 330 early-type (O9.5–B6) stars in eight Carina Nebula clusters, derived from Gaussian fits to the FWHM of the He I 4388 and 4471 Å lines and interpolation in a synthetic grid of non-LTE line widths. For 222 of these stars the v sin i values are new, and for Trumpler 15, Collinder 228, Collinder 232, and Bochum 11 they are the first reported in the literature. The paper establishes that the Carina cluster rotation distribution peaks at 100–150 km/s, matching cluster B stars elsewhere, that B0–B3 stars show a bimodal distribution with peaks near 100 and 200 km/s plus a small excess near 350 km/s, and that NGC 3293, the oldest cluster, has the highest median v sin i (192 km/s) and an asymmetric tail toward high velocities, whereas Collinder 228 has the lowest median (108 km/s), differences the authors interpret as possible signatures of environment and binary-driven spin-up.

Load-bearing premise

Every rotation value in the paper depends on the assumption that a grid of synthetic helium-line widths computed at a single gravity and at two spectral resolutions accurately represents the real GIRAFFE spectra, which have a range of gravities and a resolution near 20,000; if that transfer fails, all reported v sin i values could be systematically biased by tens of km/s.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For 222 of 330 Carina cluster stars, the v sin i values are new, and for Trumpler 15, Collinder 228, Collinder 232, and Bochum 11 they are the first ever reported, giving these clusters their first rotation census.
  • The Carina cluster distribution peaks at 100–150 km/s and is broadly consistent with the distribution for B stars in other Galactic clusters, while differing from field B stars, which have an excess of slow rotators.
  • The bimodal B0–B3 distribution, with peaks near 100 and 200 km/s, repeats a pattern seen in 30 Doradus and suggests two stellar populations or two spin-up channels among the hottest cluster stars.
  • The cluster-to-cluster contrast, with NGC 3293 having the highest median v sin i (192 km/s) and an asymmetric high-velocity tail and Collinder 228 the lowest (108 km/s), indicates that cluster age or local environment shapes the rotation distribution, with binary mass transfer a plausible cause of the excess fast rotators in the older cluster.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the calibration grid is fixed at log g = 4.0 and at two spectral resolutions, a star-by-star reanalysis with an independent Fourier-transform spectral fitting method on the same GIRAFFE spectra would directly test whether the absolute scale of v sin i in this paper is biased at high rotation.
  • The authors flag that their Be-star count (73) may be inflated by nebular emission lines; if high-resolution follow-ups shrink that number, the strength of the claimed link between rapid rotation and Be disks in Carina would weaken.
  • The bimodality is established on about 206 B0–B3 stars; applying the same FWHM calibration to a comparably sized sample in another young complex would show whether the 100/200 km/s peaks are a universal feature of young cluster B stars or particular to Carina.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents projected rotational velocities for 330 early-type stars in eight open clusters in the Carina Nebula, using GIRAFFE spectra from the Gaia-ESO Survey. Cluster membership is assessed through Gaia EDR3 astrometry/photometry and radial velocities measured from the same spectra. The Vsini values are derived by interpolating measured FWHM values of the He I lines at 4388 and 4471 Å in the synthetic grid of Daflon et al. (2007). The authors compare their values with literature measurements, discuss the Vsini distribution of the full sample, the B0-B3 subsample, Be/non-Be stars, and individual clusters, and claim first-time Vsini estimates for 222 stars and for members of Trumpler 15, Collinder 228, Collinder 232, and Bochum 11.

Significance. A homogeneous, large Vsini catalog for bright OB stars in a complex star-forming region is valuable, and the comparisons with Huang & Gies, Hanes, Hunter, McSwain, Morel, and Berlanas show mean offsets of only a few km/s, which strengthens confidence in the central measurement. The membership analysis using Gaia EDR3 and the public-data basis are additional strengths. However, the novelty claim is internally inconsistent: Section 1 states that Vsini values are already available for Trumpler 15 from Hanes et al. (2018), while the Abstract and Section 6 assert that Trumpler 15 is included in the first-time cluster estimates. Also, the calibration grid is computed at spectral resolutions of 10,000 and 50,000, whereas the observed spectra have resolution near 20,000-25,000, and this resolution transfer is not validated. These issues are load-bearing for the paper's main claims and need to be addressed before publication.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, Section 1, Section 6, Figure 7] The headline novelty claim is self-contradictory. Section 1 states that 'Estimates of stellar parameters and rotational velocities based on spectroscopic analysis are available in the literature for stars in Trumpler 14 and Trumpler 15 (Hanes et al. 2018)', while the Abstract and Section 6 state that Vsini estimates for members of Trumpler 15, Collinder 228, Collinder 232, and Bochum 11 are presented for the first time. The comparison in Figure 7 (top-left) explicitly includes Hanes et al. (2018) values, so the reader cannot rule out overlapping targets. The authors must provide an explicit cross-match table showing which stars already had Vsini measurements, revise the cluster-level novelty claims, and justify the number '222 first estimates' accordingly.
  2. [Section 4] All Vsini values depend on interpolating measured FWHM values in the Daflon et al. (2007) grid, but that grid was computed only at spectral resolutions R ~ 10,000 and 50,000, while the GIRAFFE HR05A spectra used here have a nominal resolution higher than 20,000 (Section 2). The FWHM-to-Vsini relation is resolution-dependent, especially at low Vsini, and no test of the interpolation in resolution is described. The authors should validate the transfer, for example by computing synthetic FWHM at R ~ 20,000 or by checking a sample of stars with independently known Vsini across the full velocity range; otherwise the quoted mean offsets of a few km/s do not exclude systematic biases of tens of km/s for subsets of stars.
  3. [Section 4, Table B1, Section 5.1] The quoted uncertainties appear to be only the dispersion between the values inferred from the two He I lines. Many entries in Table B1 have a FWHM for only one line, and no uncertainty is listed for those stars. More importantly, the systematic uncertainties of the grid - fixed log g = 4.0, coarse 5,000 K Teff steps, and the 12-33% underestimation from missing gravitational darkening and macroturbulence cited from Daflon et al. (2007) - are not propagated into the error bars used in the cluster comparisons, the CDF analysis, and the bimodality claim. The authors should state explicitly that the quoted errors are internal only and add a systematic error term or demonstrate that the main conclusions are robust to such a term.
  4. [Section 5.3, Figure 11] The claim that the Vsini distribution of B0-B3 stars is bimodal, with a third small peak at high velocities, is supported only by an Epanechnikov kernel density estimate and an unspecified 'combination of Gaussian distributions'. No formal test against a unimodal null distribution is reported, no p-values or likelihood ratios are given, and the mixture components are not tabulated. Since this bimodality is presented as a physical result and is compared with Dufton et al. (2013), the paper should provide a quantitative model comparison (e.g., a Gaussian mixture fit with a unimodal null) with significance levels.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix C] In the first paragraph, 'FWHM measurements of the Hi lines' should read 'He I lines', and the header of Table C1 uses 'Hilines'; the same typo appears in the appendix title.
  2. [Table B1] The column header 'FHWM' is misspelled; it should be 'FWHM'. Also, some entries such as '2MASS 10351352-5811125' are missing the 'J' prefix used by other entries.
  3. [Figure 8] The caption does not explain the meaning of the light blue circles connected by horizontal lines; it should state that these correspond to alternative ages from the literature, and ideally identify the source for each point.
  4. [Section 5.3] The K-S test statement says that the null hypothesis is rejected at the 95% confidence level, but neither the test statistic nor the p-values for the comparisons with Abt et al. (2002) and Huang & Gies (2008) are reported.
  5. [Section 4] The paper does not specify how the GES effective temperatures are combined with the measured FWHM for stars where only one He I line is usable, nor how the grid interpolation is performed in Teff and in resolution; a short description of the interpolation scheme would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the v sin i values are measured from observed helium-line FWHMs and interpolated in an independent published synthetic grid (Daflon et al. 2007), then checked against external literature and other GES nodes; the paper's "first-time" claim for Trumpler 15 is internally inconsistent with its own citation of Hanes et al.

full rationale

The v sin i derivation chain is self-contained and not circular. FWHM widths of He I 4388 and 4471 are measured from the observed GIRAFFE spectra, and the v sin i values are obtained by interpolating those widths in the pre-existing Daflon et al. (2007) synthetic grid built from ATLAS9 atmospheres plus DETAIL/SURFACE non-LTE line formation, which did not use any of the present paper's data or fits (Section 4: "We used the methodology described by Daflon et al. (2007), based on the full width at half maximum (FWHM) measurements of synthetic profiles... The grid covers Teff from 15,000 to 30,000 K, in steps of 5,000 K, and constant values of surface gravity (log g = 4.0...)"). No parameter is fitted to the Carina sample, the adopted Teff values come from GES, and membership rests on Gaia EDR3 astrometry and radial velocities, so there is no self-referential loop between the measured quantities and the reported v sin i. Although Daflon et al. (2007) shares two co-authors with this paper, that calibration is independently supportable: Section 5.1 compares the present values against Huang & Gies (2006b), Hanes et al. (2018), Hunter et al. (2009), McSwain et al. (2009), Morel et al. (2022), Berlanas et al. (2025), and other GES nodes, reporting mean differences of order a few km/s, so the self-citation is backed by external benchmarks and does not raise the circularity score. The genuine weakness is a novelty-claim consistency defect, not circularity: Section 1 states "Estimates of stellar parameters and rotational velocities based on spectroscopic analysis are available in the literature for stars in Trumpler 14 and Trumpler 15 (Hanes et al. 2018)", while the Abstract and Section 6 assert that v sin i estimates for Trumpler 15 members are "presented for the first time in the literature"; moreover, Figure 7 (top-left) plots overlapping values against Hanes et al. (2018), and the paper never demonstrates that none of the overlapping stars belongs to Trumpler 15. That is a checkable factual inconsistency in the headline claim, but it is not a case of a prediction reducing by construction to its inputs. The grid-transfer risks (observed resolution ~20,000 versus grid resolutions 10,000 and 50,000, fixed log g = 4.0, 5,000 K Teff steps, no gravitational darkening or macroturbulence) are acknowledged systematic-bias risks that belong in correctness review, not circularity review.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central catalog rests on an external synthetic spectrum grid and on membership cuts; no numbers are fitted in this paper to make the derivation work, and no invented entities are introduced. The adopted GES Teff values are inputs from the survey, not fitted here, and have a small documented effect on v sin i. The grid's fixed parameters are treated as inherited inputs from Daflon et al. (2007) and are listed as domain assumptions rather than free parameters.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The ATLAS9 LTE plus DETAIL and SURFACE non-LTE He I synthetic profiles reproduce the observed 4388 and 4471 Å line widths for Carina B stars.
    Section 4 bases all v sin i estimates on interpolation in this grid; accuracy is checked only indirectly through literature comparison.
  • domain assumption All sample stars have log g in [3.7, 4.3], so the fixed log g=4.0 grid is valid to within about 10 percent in v sin i.
    Section 4: the grid is fixed at log g=4.0; Daflon et al. found deviations of 10 to 15 percent for plus or minus 0.5 dex. The paper argues most stars are main sequence but does not measure log g.
  • domain assumption Neglect of gravitational darkening and macroturbulence does not invalidate the v sin i estimates.
    Section 4 states these effects can underestimate v sin i by 12 to 33 percent depending on spectral type and rotation, yet the grid does not include them.
  • domain assumption Gaia EDR3 parallax, RUWE, and radial velocity criteria correctly assign membership with manageable contamination.
    Section 3 uses 3-sigma parallax cuts and RUWE below 1.4 to exclude about 11 percent and keeps 8 borderline stars; contamination in Carina is estimated at about 20 percent.
  • domain assumption Spectral types for the B0-B3 subsample are reliable enough for the bimodality analysis.
    Section 5.3 uses SIMBAD types, with rough estimates from Teff and metal-line ratios when the subtype is unavailable.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Gaia-ESO Survey: Projected Rotational Velocities of B stars in the Carina Nebula." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZWUL4Z43

@misc{pith2026250700800,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Gaia-ESO Survey: Projected Rotational Velocities of B stars in the Carina Nebula},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZWUL4Z43}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.00800}
}
abstract

The Carina Nebula is an active star-forming region with several open clusters rich in massive OB stars, thus making it an optimal target for studying stellar properties such as rotation for large samples of these early-type stars. We studied a sample of early-type stars probable members of the 8 open clusters in the Carina Complex. The observational data consist of high-resolution spectra from the Gaia-ESO public Spectroscopic Survey. Astrometric and photometric data from Gaia EDR3 and radial velocities measured from the observed spectra are used to confirm the cluster members. The projected rotational velocities of 330 early-type stars of Carina are derived from the widths of \ion{He}{i} lines at 4388 and 4471 \AA. The reported \Vsini\ values are the first estimates for 222 early-type stars. The \Vsini\ distribution for the Carina clusters peaks at $\sim$100-150 \kms, consistent with the distributions for B stars in Galactic clusters. \Vsini\ estimates for stars members of the clusters Trumpler 15, Collinder 228, Collinder 232, and Bochum 11 are presented for the first time in the literature. For a subsample of stars with earlier spectral types from B0 to B3, we find a bimodal distribution, with a third, small peak towards the upper values of \Vsini. When the full sample is split according to the parent cluster, we find that the oldest cluster in our sample, NGC 3293, presents a higher concentration of rapidly rotating stars. In contrast, Collinder 228 presents a larger number of stars with lower \Vsini.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00800 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of Signal-to-noise ratios measured in spectra from the sample of 347 stars of spectral types B5 to O9.5 obtained through the HR5 setup. intense temperature variation, ranging from cold (Yonekura et al. 2005) to hot (Seward et al. 1979; Townsley et al. 2011). Carina remains a highly active star-forming region, featuring dense pillars of dust and bright emission from H ii regions (Povich et al. 2011). The… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Examples of observed spectra for the B1 star ALS 15861, corre￾sponding to the four GIRAFFE configurations HR03, HR04, HR05A, and HR06. Relevant absorption features are identified in the panels. lower-than-expected binary fraction for typical early-type star sam￾ples, likely due to the survey design. Consequently, in our analysis, SB1 candidates and single stars were treated using the same method￾ology. Furthermore, … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Comparison between the distributions of radial velocities obtained in this work (light blue histogram) and the values from other GES nodes (black-lined histogram). measurements or a poorly behaved solution. Stars with RUWE > 1.4 have been discarded from our analysis. As an additional parameter for a good astrometric solution from Gaia, we also considered precise parallax (𝜛) measurements, with 𝜎𝜛 ∼ 10%. The parallax… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Gaia EDR3 astrometric and photometric data for the cluster Trumpler 14. Blue symbols represent stars that are cluster members, while red symbols highlight non-members. The open circles represent stars with 𝑉 sin 𝑖 measurements, while those stars selected for abundance …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The effect of 𝑉 sin 𝑖 on the observed profiles of He i lines at 4388Å (right panel) and 4471Å (left panel). The 𝑉 sin 𝑖 values corresponding to each example spectrum are, from top to bottom, 35 km s−1 (blue line, star ALS 1808), 114 km s−1 (orange line, ALS 17541), and…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The effect of three different 𝑉 sin 𝑖 (left panel) and of three different 𝑇eff (right panel) on the synthetic profiles of He i line 4471Å. uncertainties, with a few discrepant values, and the error bars tend to be larger for the higher 𝑉 sin 𝑖, which is expected and co…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of 𝑉 sin 𝑖 values obtained in this study with literature results. The top-left panel presents published 𝑉 sin 𝑖 values derived from the widths of He i lines by Huang & Gies (2006b, blue circles) and Hanes et al. (2018, orange pentagons), showing an average d…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Distribution of 𝑉 sin 𝑖 obtained for 330 probable members of the Carina region (light blue histogram), compared to the distributions of 𝑉 sin 𝑖 of early-type stars in clusters (dark blue line, Huang & Gies (2006a)), and for field stars (Huang & Gies (2008); purple line…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Distribution of 𝑉 sin 𝑖 for 206 B0-B3 stars of our sample. The PDF obtained with a Epanechnikov kernel is represented by the orange line and the black symbols at the bottom represent the 𝑉 sin 𝑖 estimates in each bin. The vertical scatter of points is artificial to av…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: shows the 𝑉 sin 𝑖 distributions for non-Be stars (blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Violin distributions of 𝑉 sin 𝑖 of early-type stars of the open clusters Trumpler 16 E (blue) Trumpler 14(orange), Trumpler 15 (green), Collinder 228 (red) and NGC 3293 (purple). The distributions are arranged according to increasing clusters ages, from top to bottom.…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    A., Levato H., Grosso M., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340590 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...573..359A 573, 359

    Abt H. A., Levato H., Grosso M., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340590 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...573..359A 573, 359

    doi:10.1086/340590 2002

  4. [4]

    R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245335 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...671A..20B 671, A20

    Berlanas S. R., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245335 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...671A..20B 671, A20

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245335 2023

  5. [5]

    R., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2501.16508 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250116508B p

    Berlanas S. R., et al., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2501.16508 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250116508B p. arXiv:2501.16508

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.16508 2025

  6. [6]

    Blomme R., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142349 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...661A.120B 661, A120

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142349 2022

  7. [7]

    Bragaglia A., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142674 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...659A.200B 659, A200

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142674 2022

  8. [8]

    A., Daflon S., Cunha K., Bensby T., Oey M

    Bragan c a G. A., Daflon S., Cunha K., Bensby T., Oey M. S., Walth G., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/130 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....144..130B 144, 130

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/144/5/130 2012

Show all 77 references
  1. [9]

    A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834554 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...625A.120B 625, A120

    Bragan c a G. A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834554 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...625A.120B 625, A120

    2019 doi

  2. [10]

    Butler K., Giddings J., 1985, Newsletter on the analysis of astronomical spectra, No. 9, Univ. College London

    1985

  3. [11]

    Cantat-Gaudin T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833476 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...618A..93C 618, A93

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    Cantat-Gaudin T., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038192 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...640A...1C 640, A1

    2020 doi

  5. [13]

    Conrad C., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201630012 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...600A.106C 600, A106

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    P., Churchwell E

    Cudworth K., Martin S., 1993, in Cassinelli J. P., Churchwell E. B., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 35, Massive Stars: Their Lives in the Interstellar Medium. p. 266

    1993

  7. [15]

    X., Wolff S., Przybilla N., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521707 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....134.1570D 134, 1570

    Daflon S., Cunha K., de Ara \'u jo F. X., Wolff S., Przybilla N., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/521707 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....134.1570D 134, 1570

    2007 doi

  8. [16]

    Damiani F., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628169 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...591A..74D 591, A74

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    Damiani F., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629020 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...603A..81D 603, A81

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    S., Monteiro H., Moitinho A., Lepine J

    Dias W. S., Monteiro H., Moitinho A., Lepine J. R. D., Carraro G., Paunzen E., Alessi B., Villela L., 2021a, VizieR Online Data Catalog, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021yCat..75040356D p. J/MNRAS/504/356

  11. [19]

    S., Monteiro H., Moitinho A., L \'e pine J

    Dias W. S., Monteiro H., Moitinho A., L \'e pine J. R. D., Carraro G., Paunzen E., Alessi B., Villela L., 2021b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab770 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.504..356D 504, 356

    doi

  12. [20]

    L., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...550A.109D 550, A109

    Dufton P. L., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...550A.109D 550, A109

    2013 doi

  13. [21]

    J., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042446 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...437..467E 437, 467

    Evans C. J., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042446 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...437..467E 437, 467

    2005 doi

  14. [22]

    G., Muzzio J

    Feinstein A., Marraco H. G., Muzzio J. C., 1973, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A&AS...12..331F 12, 331

    1973

  15. [23]

    Gaia Collaboration 2020, VizieR Online Data Catalog, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020yCat.1350....0G p. I/350

    2020

  16. [24]

    Gaia Collaboration et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A...1G 649, A1

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    R., 1980, PhD thesis, University College London, United Kingdom

    Giddings J. R., 1980, PhD thesis, University College London, United Kingdom

    1980

  18. [26]

    R., Huang W., 2004, in Maeder A., Eenens P., eds, IAU Symposium Vol

    Gies D. R., Huang W., 2004, in Maeder A., Eenens P., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 215, Stellar Rotation. p. 57

    2004

  19. [27]

    Gilmore G., et al., 2012, The Messenger, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Msngr.147...25G 147, 25

    2012

  20. [28]

    Gilmore G., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243134 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...666A.120G 666, A120

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    G \"o ppl C., Preibisch T., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142576 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...660A..11G 660, A11

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    J., McSwain M

    Hanes R. J., McSwain M. V., Povich M. S., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aab70d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....155..190H 155, 190

    2018 doi

  23. [31]

    Hourihane A., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202345910 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...676A.129H 676, A129

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    R., 2006a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505782 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...648..580H 648, 580

    Huang W., Gies D. R., 2006a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505782 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...648..580H 648, 580

    doi

  25. [33]

    R., 2006b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505783 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...648..591H 648, 591

    Huang W., Gies D. R., 2006b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505783 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...648..591H 648, 591

    doi

  26. [34]

    R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/590106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...683.1045H 683, 1045

    Huang W., Gies D. R., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/590106 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...683.1045H 683, 1045

    2008 doi

  27. [35]

    L., Reffert S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346285 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673A.114H 673, A114

    Hunt E. L., Reffert S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346285 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673A.114H 673, A114

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    Hunter I., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200809925 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A&A...496..841H 496, 841

    2009 doi

  29. [37]

    S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/143/2/41 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....143...41H 143, 41

    Hur H., Sung H., Bessell M. S., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/143/2/41 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012AJ....143...41H 143, 41

    2012 doi

  30. [38]

    Kurucz CD-ROM No

    Kurucz R., 1993, ATLAS9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid. Kurucz CD-ROM No. 13. Cambridge, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993KurCD..13.....K 13

    1993

  31. [39]

    Lim B., Naz \'e Y., Gosset E., Rauw G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2548 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490..440L 490, 440

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Lindegren L., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936161 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...633A...1L 633, A1

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    Lindegren L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039653 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A...4L 649, A4

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    V., Popova M

    Loktin A. V., Popova M. E., 2017, @doi [Astrophysical Bulletin] 10.1134/S1990341317030154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AstBu..72..257L 72, 257

    2017 doi

  35. [43]

    Maeder A., Meynet G., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0006405 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...361..159M 361, 159

    2000 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    H., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732050 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...613A...9M 613, A9

    Ma \'i z Apell \'a niz J., Barb \'a R. H., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732050 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...613A...9M 613, A9

    2018 doi

  37. [45]

    Ma\'iz Apell\'aniz J., et al., 2016, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.3847/0067-0049/224/1/4 , 224, 4

    2016 doi

  38. [46]

    H., Fern \'a ndez Aranda R., Sota A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038228 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A.138M 643, A138

    Ma \' z Apell \'a niz J., Crespo Bellido P., Barb \'a R. H., Fern \'a ndez Aranda R., Sota A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038228 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A.138M 643, A138

    2020 doi

  39. [47]

    H., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140418 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A..13M 649, A13

    Ma \'i z Apell \'a niz J., Pantaleoni Gonz \'a lez M., Barb \'a R. H., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140418 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A..13M 649, A13

    2021 doi

  40. [48]

    H., Fern \'a ndez Aranda R., Pantaleoni Gonz \'a lez M., Crespo Bellido P., Sota A., Alfaro E

    Ma \' z Apell \'a niz J., Barb \'a R. H., Fern \'a ndez Aranda R., Pantaleoni Gonz \'a lez M., Crespo Bellido P., Sota A., Alfaro E. J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202142364 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...657A.131M 657, A131

    2022 doi

  41. [49]

    Massey P., Johnson J., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/116487 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993AJ....105..980M 105, 980

    1993 doi

  42. [50]

    V., Gies D

    McSwain M. V., Gies D. R., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/432757 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJS..161..118M 161, 118

    2005 doi

  43. [51]

    V., Huang W., Gies D

    McSwain M. V., Huang W., Gies D. R., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1216 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...700.1216M 700, 1216

    2009 doi

  44. [52]

    S., Moitinho A., Cantat-Gaudin T., L \'e pine J

    Monteiro H., Dias W. S., Moitinho A., Cantat-Gaudin T., L \'e pine J. R. D., Carraro G., Paunzen E., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2983 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.1874M 499, 1874

    2020 doi

  45. [53]

    Morel T., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244112 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...665A.108M 665, A108

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    S., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/194/1/14 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..194...14P 194, 14

    Povich M. S., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/194/1/14 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..194...14P 194, 14

    2011 doi

  47. [55]

    Preibisch T., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201116781 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...530A..34P 530, A34

    2011 doi

  48. [56]

    Randich S., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243141 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...666A.121R 666, A121

    2022 doi

  49. [57]

    Rebolledo D., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2776 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.456.2406R 456, 2406

    2016 doi

  50. [58]

    Rebolledo D., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6d76 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...891..113R 891, 113

    2020 doi

  51. [59]

    C., Martayan C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-013-0069-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&ARv..21...69R 21, 69

    Rivinius T., Carciofi A. C., Martayan C., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-013-0069-0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&ARv..21...69R 21, 69

    2013 doi

  52. [60]

    D., Forman W

    Seward F. D., Forman W. R., Giacconi R., Griffiths R. E., Harnden F. R. J., Jones C., Pye J. P., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/183108 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979ApJ...234L..55S 234, L55

    1979 doi

  53. [61]

    M., Darling J., Danforth C

    Shull J. M., Darling J., Danforth C. W., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abf4d8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...914...18S 914, 18

    2021 doi

  54. [62]

    W., 1986, Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis

    Silverman B. W., 1986, Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall, London

    1986

  55. [63]

    Sim\'on-Díaz S., Herrero A., 2007, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066060 , 468, 1063

    2007 doi

  56. [64]

    R., Hartmann L

    Stauffer J. R., Hartmann L. W., 1986, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, pp 1233--1251

    1986

  57. [65]

    St e pie \'n K., 2000, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...353..227S 353, 227

    2000

  58. [66]

    K., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/194/1/15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..194...15T 194, 15

    Townsley L. K., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/194/1/15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..194...15T 194, 15

    2011 doi

  59. [67]

    A., Rucinski S

    Wade R. A., Rucinski S. M., 1985, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985A&AS...60..471W 60, 471

    1985

  60. [68]

    R., Hesser J

    Walborn N. R., Hesser J. E., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159542 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...252..156W 252, 156

    1982 doi

  61. [69]

    R., Danks A

    Walborn N. R., Danks A. C., Vieira G., Landsman W. B., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/339373 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJS..140..407W 140, 407

    2002 doi

  62. [70]

    C., Edwards S., Preston G

    Wolff S. C., Edwards S., Preston G. W., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159560 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982ApJ...252..322W 252, 322

    1982 doi

  63. [71]

    C., Strom S

    Wolff S. C., Strom S. E., Dror D., Venn K., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/511002 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007AJ....133.1092W 133, 1092

    2007 doi

  64. [72]

    J., Fukui Y., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/496869 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...634..476Y 634, 476

    Yonekura Y., Asayama S., Kimura K., Ogawa H., Kanai Y., Yamaguchi N., Barnes P. J., Fukui Y., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/496869 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...634..476Y 634, 476

    2005 doi

  65. [73]

    P., 1977, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977A&A....57..383Z 57, 383

    Zahn J. P., 1977, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977A&A....57..383Z 57, 383

    1977

  66. [74]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

  67. [75]

    @esa (Ref

    \@ifclassloaded agu2001 natbib The agu2001 class already includes natbib coding, so you should not add it explicitly Type <Return> for now, but then later remove the command natbib from the document \@ifclassloaded aguplus natbib The aguplus class already includes natbib codin...

  68. [76]

    @stdbsttrue NAT@ctr \@lbibitem[ NAT@ctr ] \@lbibitem[#1]#2 \@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@namedef br@#2 \@nameuse br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined b@#2\@extra@b@citeb @num @parse #2 [ @natanchorstart #2\@extra@b@citeb \@biblabel @num @natanchorend] @ifc...

  69. [77]

    3 k vǜnժUqƤI&;;;θ;#++ NW 7 7n, 3< ;v< C '򊼮k׮3Dݺu k/-Z(nx72ZOu]W

    @open @close @open @close and [1] URL: #1 \@ifundefined chapter * \@mkboth \@ifundefined NAT@sectionbib * \@mkboth * \@mkboth\@gobbletwo \@ifclassloaded amsart * \@ifclassloaded amsbook * \@ifundefined bib@heading @heading NAT@ctr thebibliography [1] @ \@biblabel NAT@ctr \@bib...

    1985 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.