pith. sign in

arxiv: 2507.00944 · v2 · submitted 2025-07-01 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.stat-mech

Revealing emergent many-body phenomena by analyzing large-scale space-time records of monitored quantum systems

Marcel Cech , Cecilia De Fazio , Mar\'ia Cea , Mari Carmen Ba\~nuls , Igor Lesanovsky , Federico Carollo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 06:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mech
keywords quantum trajectoriesmonitored quantum systemsdissipative spin modelhydrophobic behaviorRydberg simulatorsfree-energy functionalsemergent phenomenameasurement-induced dynamics
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Free-energy analysis of quantum trajectories reveals hydrophobic-like features in a dissipative spin model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that large-scale space-time records from monitored quantum systems can expose emergent many-body phenomena through analysis of individual trajectories. Using a dissipative spin model realizable on Rydberg simulators, free-energy functionals applied to trajectory ensembles identify statistical features that mirror hydrophobic behavior near the liquid-vapor transition in water with solutes. This approach allows in situ extraction of complex dynamics from experimental runs. The authors show these features remain detectable despite typical imperfections such as readout errors and disordered interactions.

Core claim

In the paradigmatic dissipative spin model, the trajectories of individual experimental runs reveal surprisingly complex statistical phenomena. Free-energy functionals for trajectory ensembles are used to identify dynamical features reminiscent of hydrophobic behavior observed near the liquid-vapor transition in the presence of solutes in water. These phenomena are observable in experiments, and the impact of common imperfections such as readout errors and disordered interactions is discussed.

What carries the argument

Free-energy functionals for trajectory ensembles, which quantify and classify statistical structures in the space-time records of monitored quantum trajectories.

If this is right

  • Large-scale space-time structures in quantum trajectories become accessible for direct experimental study without requiring full state tomography.
  • Individual experimental runs can suffice to reveal complex statistical phenomena previously hidden in ensemble averages.
  • The method provides a concrete route to observe measurement-induced emergent behaviors in current quantum simulator platforms.
  • Hydrophobic-like features serve as a diagnostic signature for certain classes of monitored many-body dynamics.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same free-energy approach could be tested on other monitored systems such as trapped ions or superconducting circuits to check generality beyond spin models.
  • Connections to classical phase transitions suggest that varying measurement strength might tune the system across an effective analog of a liquid-vapor line.
  • Disorder in interactions could be deliberately engineered to map how robustness of the hydrophobic-like features depends on spatial inhomogeneity.

Load-bearing premise

The paradigmatic dissipative spin model and its trajectory statistics remain representative of experimental Rydberg systems even after accounting for readout errors and disordered interactions.

What would settle it

Apply the free-energy functional analysis to trajectory data collected from a real Rydberg quantum simulator and check whether the predicted hydrophobic-like dynamical features appear or are washed out by realistic readout errors and interaction disorder.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.00944 by Cecilia De Fazio, Federico Carollo, Igor Lesanovsky, Marcel Cech, Mar\'ia Cea, Mari Carmen Ba\~nuls.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (b)]. The first term in Eq. (2) describes a chain of resonantly-driven Rydberg atoms (Rabi frequency Ω) with nearest-neighbor interaction strength V . The second term in Eq. (2) enforces a driving on the ancillas with frequency γ0 = p γ/∆t conditional on the corre￾sponding system atom being in |0S⟩, which allows one to probe the ground-state population [99]. In the following, we explore the dynamics of suc… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent advances in quantum simulators permit unitary evolution interspersed with locally resolved mid-circuit measurements. This paves the way for the observation of large-scale space-time structures in quantum trajectories and opens a window for the \emph{in situ} analysis of complex dynamical processes. We demonstrate this idea using a paradigmatic dissipative spin model, which can be implemented, e.g., on Rydberg quantum simulators. Here, already the trajectories of individual experimental runs reveal surprisingly complex statistical phenomena. In particular, we exploit free-energy functionals for trajectory ensembles to identify dynamical features reminiscent of hydrophobic behavior observed near the liquid-vapor transition in the presence of solutes in water. We show that these phenomena are observable in experiments and discuss the impact of common imperfections, such as readout errors and disordered interactions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript demonstrates the use of free-energy functionals applied to ensembles of quantum trajectories generated by a monitored dissipative spin model (implementable on Rydberg arrays) to extract emergent many-body features analogous to hydrophobic behavior near a liquid-vapor transition. The authors argue that individual experimental runs already display complex statistical structure and that the reported phenomena remain observable once common imperfections are taken into account.

Significance. If the free-energy signatures prove robust, the approach would supply a concrete statistical-mechanics tool for interpreting large-scale space-time records from monitored quantum simulators, potentially revealing dynamical phases or transitions that are invisible to conventional order parameters.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the hydrophobic-like trajectory features are observable in experiments rests on the assertion that readout errors and disordered interactions leave the relevant free-energy minima qualitatively intact. No explicit recomputation of the functionals (or equivalent large-deviation rate functions) under perturbed dynamics with 1-5% readout errors or 10-20% interaction disorder is presented, rendering the mapping from ideal-model trajectories to realistic Rydberg records an unverified assumption.
minor comments (1)
  1. The definition and normalization of the trajectory free-energy functional should be stated explicitly in the main text rather than only in supplementary material, to allow readers to reproduce the reported minima without ambiguity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the positive overall assessment. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional explicit calculations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the hydrophobic-like trajectory features are observable in experiments rests on the assertion that readout errors and disordered interactions leave the relevant free-energy minima qualitatively intact. No explicit recomputation of the functionals (or equivalent large-deviation rate functions) under perturbed dynamics with 1-5% readout errors or 10-20% interaction disorder is presented, rendering the mapping from ideal-model trajectories to realistic Rydberg records an unverified assumption.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript relies on a qualitative discussion of robustness rather than explicit recomputation of the free-energy functionals under the specific perturbation strengths mentioned. The existing text argues that the relevant minima remain intact on the basis of the stability of the underlying trajectory statistics and perturbative considerations, but does not present new numerical evaluations of the rate functions for 1-5% readout errors or 10-20% interaction disorder. To strengthen the claim, we will add these explicit recomputations in the revised version, most likely as an additional figure or appendix section that directly compares the ideal and perturbed free-energy landscapes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper applies established free-energy functionals from statistical mechanics to trajectory ensembles generated by a dissipative spin model. The identification of hydrophobic-like dynamical features follows directly from computing these functionals on the model's space-time records, without any step that reduces a reported prediction or first-principles result to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or load-bearing self-citation. Imperfections such as readout errors are discussed separately as an experimental consideration rather than being folded into the core derivation. The analysis therefore remains self-contained and independent of its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard quantum trajectory formalism and free-energy concepts imported from statistical mechanics, plus the domain assumption that the chosen dissipative spin model maps to Rydberg hardware. No new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • dissipation and interaction rates in the spin model
    Specific parameter values are chosen to realize the model on simulators and to make the hydrophobic-like features visible; these are not derived from first principles within the paper.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The dissipative spin model can be implemented on Rydberg quantum simulators.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the platform for observing the trajectories.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5685 in / 1212 out tokens · 44743 ms · 2026-05-19T06:37:43.834067+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    we exploit free-energy functionals for trajectory ensembles to identify dynamical features reminiscent of hydrophobic behavior... Fℓ×τ = −log pℓ×τ... Δτ Fℓ×τ = ατ ℓ + βτ

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Exact large deviations and emergent long-range correlations in sequential quantum East circuits

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Conditioning on rare boundary measurement outcomes in a quantum East circuit generates states with finite two-point correlations at arbitrary distances and an underlying Sierpiński-triangle fractal structure.

  2. Quantum to classical relaxation dynamics of the dissipative Rydberg gas

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Using the truncated Wigner approximation on large 1D and 2D systems, the authors find a pronounced slowdown in magnetization relaxation and transient signatures of quantum kinetically constrained dynamics starting fro...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 124 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Shao, Y.-X

    H.-J. Shao, Y.-X. Wang, D.-Z. Zhu, Y.-S. Zhu, H.-N. Sun, S.-Y. Chen, C. Zhang, Z.-J. Fan, Y. Deng, X.-C. Yao, et al., Antiferromagnetic phase transition in a 3D fermionic Hubbard model, Nature 632, 267 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Impertro, S

    A. Impertro, S. Huh, S. Karch, J. F. Wienand, I. Bloch, and M. Aidelsburger, Strongly interacting Meissner phases in large bosonic flux ladders, Nat. Phys. 21, 895 (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Schuckert, O

    A. Schuckert, O. Katz, L. Feng, E. Crane, A. De, M. Hafezi, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Monroe, Observation of a finite-energy phase transition in a one-dimensional quantum simulator, Nat. Phys. 21, 374 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Haghshenas, E

    R. Haghshenas, E. Chertkov, M. DeCross, T. M. Gat- terman, J. A. Gerber, K. Gilmore, D. Gresh, N. Hewitt, C. V. Horst, M. Matheny, et al., Probing Critical States of Matter on a Digital Quantum Computer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 266502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Science 357, 995 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Fauseweh, Quantum many-body simulations on dig- ital quantum computers: State-of-the-art and future challenges, Nat

    B. Fauseweh, Quantum many-body simulations on dig- ital quantum computers: State-of-the-art and future challenges, Nat. Commun. 15, 2123 (2024)

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Darkwah Oppong, G

    N. Darkwah Oppong, G. Pasqualetti, O. Bettermann, P. Zechmann, M. Knap, I. Bloch, and S. F¨ olling, Probing Transport and Slow Relaxation in the Mass- Imbalanced Fermi-Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031026 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Y. Kim, A. Eddins, S. Anand, K. X. Wei, E. van den Berg, S. Rosenblatt, H. Nayfeh, Y. Wu, M. Zaletel, K. Temme, and A. Kandala, Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance, Nature 618, 500 (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    Guo, Y.-K

    S.-A. Guo, Y.-K. Wu, J. Ye, L. Zhang, W.-Q. Lian, R. Yao, Y. Wang, R.-Y. Yan, Y.-J. Yi, Y.-L. Xu, et al. , A site-resolved two-dimensional quantum simu- lator with hundreds of trapped ions, Nature 630, 613 (2024)

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    D. A. Abanin, R. Acharya, L. Aghababaie-Beni, G. Aigeldinger, A. Ajoy, R. Alcaraz, I. Aleiner, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, et al. , Constructive interference at the edge of quantum ergodic dynamics, arXiv:2506.10191 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    A. M. Kaufman, M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Quan- tum thermalization through entanglement in an isolated many-body system, Science 353, 794 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Zhou, G.-X

    Z.-Y. Zhou, G.-X. Su, J. C. Halimeh, R. Ott, H. Sun, P. Hauke, B. Yang, Z.-S. Yuan, J. Berges, and J.-W. Pan, Thermalization dynamics of a gauge theory on a quantum simulator, Science 377, 311 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    T. I. Andersen, N. Astrakhantsev, A. H. Karamlou, J. Berndtsson, J. Motruk, A. Szasz, J. A. Gross, A. Schuckert, T. Westerhout, Y. Zhang,et al., Thermal- ization and criticality on an analogue–digital quantum simulator, Nature 638, 79 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Schreiber, S

    M. Schreiber, S. S. Hodgman, P. Bordia, H. P. L¨ uschen, M. H. Fischer, R. Vosk, E. Altman, U. Schneider, and I. Bloch, Observation of many-body localization of inter- acting fermions in a quasirandom optical lattice, Science 349, 842 (2015)

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    J.-y. Choi, S. Hild, J. Zeiher, P. Schauß, A. Rubio- Abadal, T. Yefsah, V. Khemani, D. A. Huse, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Exploring the many-body localization transition in two dimensions, Science 352, 1547 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Morong, S

    W. Morong, S. R. Muleady, I. Kimchi, W. Xu, R. M. Nandkishore, A. M. Rey, and B. DeMarco, Disorder- controlled relaxation in a three-dimensional Hubbard model quantum simulator, Phys. Rev. Research 3, L012009 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Q. Guo, C. Cheng, Z.-H. Sun, Z. Song, H. Li, Z. Wang, W. Ren, H. Dong, D. Zheng, Y.-R. Zhang, et al., Obser- vation of energy-resolved many-body localization, Nat. Phys. 17, 234 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Scherg, T

    S. Scherg, T. Kohlert, P. Sala, F. Pollmann, B. Hebbe Madhusudhana, I. Bloch, and M. Aidels- 6 burger, Observing non-ergodicity due to kinetic con- straints in tilted Fermi-Hubbard chains, Nat. Commun. 12, 4490 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    Adler, D

    D. Adler, D. Wei, M. Will, K. Srakaew, S. Agrawal, P. Weckesser, R. Moessner, F. Pollmann, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Observation of Hilbert space fragmentation and fractonic excitations in 2D, Nature 636, 80 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Shi, Z.-H

    Y.-H. Shi, Z.-H. Sun, Y.-Y. Wang, Z.-A. Wang, Y.-R. Zhang, W.-G. Ma, H.-T. Liu, K. Zhao, J.-C. Song, G.-H. Liang, et al. , Probing spin hydrodynamics on a super- conducting quantum simulator, Nat. Commun.15, 7573 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Karch, S

    S. Karch, S. Bandyopadhyay, Z.-H. Sun, A. Impertro, S. Huh, I. P. Rodr´ ıguez, J. F. Wienand, W. Ket- terle, M. Heyl, A. Polkovnikov, et al. , Probing quan- tum many-body dynamics using subsystem Loschmidt echos, arXiv:2501.16995 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    L. Zhao, P. R. Datla, W. Tian, M. M. Aliyu, and H. Loh, Observation of Quantum Thermalization Restricted to Hilbert Space Fragments and Z2k Scars, Phys. Rev. X 15, 011035 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Honda, Y

    K. Honda, Y. Takasu, S. Goto, H. Kazuta, M. Kunimi, I. Danshita, and Y. Takahashi, Observation of slow re- laxation due to hilbert space fragmentation in strongly interacting bose-hubbard chains, Sci. Adv.11, eadv3255 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, et al. , Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    G.-X. Su, H. Sun, A. Hudomal, J.-Y. Desaules, Z.-Y. Zhou, B. Yang, J. C. Halimeh, Z.-S. Yuan, Z. Papi´ c, and J.-W. Pan, Observation of many-body scarring in a Bose-Hubbard quantum simulator, Phys. Rev. Research 5, 023010 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Z. Bao, S. Xu, Z. Song, K. Wang, L. Xiang, Z. Zhu, J. Chen, F. Jin, X. Zhu, Y. Gao, et al. , Creating and controlling global Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger en- tanglement on quantum processors, Nat. Commun. 15, 8823 (2024)

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    A. D. C´ orcoles, M. Takita, K. Inoue, S. Lekuch, Z. K. Minev, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Exploiting Dynamic Quantum Circuits in a Quantum Algorithm with Superconducting Qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 100501 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    J. M. Pino, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S. A. Moses, M. S. Allman, C. H. Baldwin, M. Foss- Feig, D. Hayes, K. Mayer, et al., Demonstration of the trapped-ion quantum CCD computer architecture, Na- ture 592, 209 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Deist, Y.-H

    E. Deist, Y.-H. Lu, J. Ho, M. K. Pasha, J. Zeiher, Z. Yan, and D. M. Stamper-Kurn, Mid-Circuit Cavity Measurement in a Neutral Atom Array, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 203602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    T. M. Graham, L. Phuttitarn, R. Chinnarasu, Y. Song, C. Poole, K. Jooya, J. Scott, A. Scott, P. Eichler, and M. Saffman, Midcircuit Measurements on a Single- Species Neutral Alkali Atom Quantum Processor, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041051 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Anand, C

    S. Anand, C. E. Bradley, R. White, V. Ramesh, K. Singh, and H. Bernien, A dual-species Rydberg array, Nat. Phys. 20, 1744 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    P. M. Harrington, E. J. Mueller, and K. W. Murch, Engineered dissipation for quantum information science, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 660 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [33]

    Diehl, A

    S. Diehl, A. Micheli, A. Kantian, B. Kraus, H. P. B¨ uchler, and P. Zoller, Quantum states and phases in driven open quantum systems with cold atoms, Nat. Phys. 4, 878 (2008)

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Quan- tum computation and quantum-state engineering driven by dissipation, Nat. Phys. 5, 633 (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    Z.-P. Cian, G. Zhu, S.-K. Chu, A. Seif, W. DeGottardi, L. Jiang, and M. Hafezi, Photon Pair Condensation by Engineered Dissipation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 063602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Paviglianiti and A

    A. Paviglianiti and A. Silva, Enhancing revivals via projective measurements in a quantum scarred system, arXiv:2503.2261 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Chertkov, Z

    E. Chertkov, Z. Cheng, A. C. Potter, S. Gopalakr- ishnan, T. M. Gatterman, J. A. Gerber, K. Gilmore, D. Gresh, A. Hall, A. Hankin, et al. , Characterizing a non-equilibrium phase transition on a quantum com- puter, Nat. Phys. 19, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    X. Mi, A. A. Michailidis, S. Shabani, K. C. Miao, P. V. Klimov, J. Lloyd, E. Rosenberg, R. Acharya, I. Aleiner, T. I. Andersen, et al. , Stable quantum- correlated many-body states through engineered dissi- pation, Science 383, 1332 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    K. Sun, M. Kang, H. Nuomin, G. Schwartz, D. N. Be- ratan, K. R. Brown, and J. Kim, Quantum simulation of spin-boson models with structured bath, Nat. Commun. 16, 4042 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    L. Li, T. Liu, X.-Y. Guo, H. Zhang, S. Zhao, Z.-A. Wang, Z. Xiang, X. Song, Y.-X. Zhang, K. Xu, et al. , Observation of multiple steady states with engineered dissipation, npj Quantum Inf. 11, 1 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    C. Chen, K. Tang, Y. Zhou, K. Yi, X. Zhang, X. Zhang, H. Guo, S. Liu, Y. Chen, T. Yan, and D. Yu, Hardware- efficient stabilization of entanglement via engineered dissipation in superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. Re- search 7, L022018 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Steffen, Y

    L. Steffen, Y. Salathe, M. Oppliger, P. Kurpiers, M. Baur, C. Lang, C. Eichler, G. Puebla-Hellmann, A. Fedorov, and A. Wallraff, Deterministic quantum teleportation with feed-forward in a solid state system, Nature 500, 319 (2013)

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Z. K. Minev, S. O. Mundhada, S. Shankar, P. Reinhold, R. Guti´ errez-J´ auregui, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mirrahimi, H. J. Carmichael, and M. H. Devoret, To catch and reverse a quantum jump mid-flight, Nature 570, 200 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Iqbal, N

    M. Iqbal, N. Tantivasadakarn, T. M. Gatterman, J. A. Gerber, K. Gilmore, D. Gresh, A. Hankin, N. Hewitt, C. V. Horst, M. Matheny, et al., Topological order from measurements and feed-forward on a trapped ion quan- tum computer, Commun. Phys. 7, 1 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Cramer, N

    J. Cramer, N. Kalb, M. A. Rol, B. Hensen, M. S. Blok, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, R. Hanson, and T. H. Taminiau, Repeated quantum error correction on a con- tinuously encoded qubit by real-time feedback, Nat. Commun. 7, 11526 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Krinner, N

    S. Krinner, N. Lacroix, A. Remm, A. Di Paolo, E. Genois, C. Leroux, C. Hellings, S. Lazar, F. Swiadek, J. Herrmann, et al. , Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code, Nature 605, 669 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Singh, C

    K. Singh, C. E. Bradley, S. Anand, V. Ramesh, 7 R. White, and H. Bernien, Mid-circuit correction of cor- related phase errors using an array of spectator qubits, Science 380, 1265 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Postler, F

    L. Postler, F. Butt, I. Pogorelov, C. D. Marciniak, S. Heußen, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, M. Rispler, M. M¨ uller, and T. Monz, Demonstration of Fault-Tolerant Steane Quantum Error Correction, PRX Quantum 5, 030326 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, et al. , Logical quantum proces- sor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature 626, 58 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Acharya, D

    R. Acharya, D. A. Abanin, L. Aghababaie-Beni, I. Aleiner, T. I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, F. Arute, K. Arya, A. Asfaw, N. Astrakhantsev, et al., Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold, Na- ture 638, 920 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Macieszczak, M

    K. Macieszczak, M. Gut ¸˘ a, I. Lesanovsky, and J. P. Gar- rahan, Dynamical phase transitions as a resource for quantum enhanced metrology, Phys. Rev. A 93, 022103 (2016)

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Ilias, D

    T. Ilias, D. Yang, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Criticality-Enhanced Quantum Sensing via Continuous Measurement, PRX Quantum 3, 010354 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Cabot, F

    A. Cabot, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Exploiting nonequilibrium phase transitions and strong symmetries for continuous measurement of collective observables, Phys. Rev. A 110, L060601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Mattes, A

    R. Mattes, A. Cabot, F. Carollo, and I. Lesanovsky, Designing open quantum systems for enabling quan- tum enhanced sensing through classical measurements, arXiv:2505.08756 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Midha and S

    S. Midha and S. Gopalakrishnan, Metrology of open quantum systems from emitted radiation, arXiv:2504.13815 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    A. Khan, F. Albarelli, and A. Datta, A tensor network approach to sensing quantum light-matter interactions, arXiv:2504.12399 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    G. Lee, R. Belyansky, L. Jiang, and A. A. Clerk, Timescales, squeezing and heisenberg scalings in many- body continuous sensing, arXiv:2505.04591 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    Ilias, Biasing quantum trajectories for enhanced sens- ing, Phys

    T. Ilias, Biasing quantum trajectories for enhanced sens- ing, Phys. Rev. A 111, 042432 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    P. Wang, C. Chen, X. Peng, J. Wrachtrup, and R.-B. Liu, Characterization of Arbitrary-Order Correlations in Quantum Baths by Weak Measurement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 050603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Z. Wu, P. Wang, T. Wang, Y. Li, R. Liu, Y. Chen, X. Peng, and R.-B. Liu, Selective Detection of Dynamics-Complete Set of Correlations via Quantum Channels, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 200802 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Touchette, The large deviation approach to statisti- cal mechanics, Phys

    H. Touchette, The large deviation approach to statisti- cal mechanics, Phys. Rep. 478, 1 (2009)

    work page 2009

  62. [62]

    J. P. Garrahan and I. Lesanovsky, Thermodynamics of Quantum Jump Trajectories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 160601 (2010)

    work page 2010

  63. [63]

    Chetrite and H

    R. Chetrite and H. Touchette, Nonequilibrium Micro- canonical and Canonical Ensembles and Their Equiva- lence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 120601 (2013)

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    M. Cech, I. Lesanovsky, and F. Carollo, Thermodynam- ics of Quantum Trajectories on a Quantum Computer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 120401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    R. L. Jack and P. Sollich, Large Deviations and Ensem- bles of Trajectories in Stochastic Models, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 184, 304 (2010)

    work page 2010

  66. [66]

    Chandler and J

    D. Chandler and J. P. Garrahan, Dynamics on the Way to Forming Glass: Bubbles in Space-Time, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 61, 191 (2010)

    work page 2010

  67. [67]

    Bodineau, V

    T. Bodineau, V. Lecomte, and C. Toninelli, Finite Size Scaling of the Dynamical Free-Energy in a Kinetically Constrained Model, J. Stat. Phys. 147, 1 (2012)

    work page 2012

  68. [68]

    R. L. Jack and P. Sollich, Large deviations of the dynam- ical activity in the East model: analysing structure in biased trajectories, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.47, 015003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  69. [69]

    R. L. Jack and P. Sollich, Effective interactions and large deviations in stochastic processes, Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top. 224, 2351 (2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    Guti´ errez and J

    R. Guti´ errez and J. P. Garrahan, Front propagation ver- sus bulk relaxation in the annealing dynamics of a kinet- ically constrained model of ultrastable glasses, J. Stat. Mech: Theory Exp. 2016, 074005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    J. P. Garrahan, Aspects of non-equilibrium in classical and quantum systems: Slow relaxation and glasses, dy- namical large deviations, quantum non-ergodicity, and open quantum dynamics, Physica A 504, 130 (2018)

    work page 2018

  72. [72]

    Buˇ ca, J

    B. Buˇ ca, J. P. Garrahan, T. Prosen, and M. Vanicat, Exact large deviation statistics and trajectory phase transition of a deterministic boundary driven cellular automaton, Phys. Rev. E 100, 020103 (2019)

    work page 2019

  73. [73]

    M. C. Ba˜ nuls and J. P. Garrahan, Using Matrix Prod- uct States to Study the Dynamical Large Deviations of Kinetically Constrained Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 200601 (2019)

    work page 2019

  74. [74]

    Causer, I

    L. Causer, I. Lesanovsky, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, and J. P. Garrahan, Dynamics and large deviation transitions of the XOR-Fredrickson-Andersen kinetically constrained model, Phys. Rev. E 102, 052132 (2020)

    work page 2020

  75. [75]

    Causer, M

    L. Causer, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, and J. P. Garrahan, Optimal sampling of dynamical large deviations via matrix prod- uct states, Phys. Rev. E 103, 062144 (2021)

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    Casert, T

    C. Casert, T. Vieijra, S. Whitelam, and I. Tamblyn, Dy- namical large deviations of two-dimensional kinetically constrained models using a neural-network state ansatz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 120602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    Causer, M

    L. Causer, M. C. Ba˜ nuls, and J. P. Garrahan, Fi- nite Time Large Deviations via Matrix Product States, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 090605 (2022)

    work page 2022

  78. [78]

    Causer, J

    L. Causer, J. P. Garrahan, and A. Lamacraft, Slow dy- namics and large deviations in classical stochastic Fred- kin chains, Phys. Rev. E 106, 014128 (2022-07)

    work page 2022

  79. [79]

    Sfairopoulos, L

    K. Sfairopoulos, L. Causer, and J. P. Garrahan, Mul- ticriticality in stochastic dynamics protected by self- duality, arXiv:2504.01258 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  80. [80]

    Lesanovsky and J

    I. Lesanovsky and J. P. Garrahan, Kinetic Constraints, Hierarchical Relaxation, and Onset of Glassiness in Strongly Interacting and Dissipative Rydberg Gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 215305 (2013)

    work page 2013

Showing first 80 references.