Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Monte-Carlo radiation hydrodynamic simulations of line-driven disc winds: relaxing the isothermal approximation

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Replacing the isothermal approximation with a full ideal-gas energy equation does not change the picture: line-driven disc winds stay overionized, with mass-loss below $10^{-5}$ of the accretion rate and weak ultraviolet wind lines.

desk verdict A careful, credible negative result: relaxing the isothermal approximation does not rescue line-driven disc winds in AWDs, but the weak-wind branch is only probed from one set of initial conditions. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05085 v1 pith:ODW5D2XF submitted 2025-07-03 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

Amin Mosallanezhad , Christian Knigge , Nicolas Scepi , James H. Matthews , Knox S. Long , Stuart A. Sim , Austen Wallis This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA
keywords radiationhydrodynamicsline-drivenwindsaccretiondiscaccretingwhitedwarfsoverionizationforcemultiplierMonteCarloradiativetransferultravioletspectroscopy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the earlier isothermal simulations of line-driven accretion-disc winds reached the right conclusion despite neglecting the wind's thermal state. It replaces the fixed-temperature equation of state with an ideal gas law, solves the full energy equation including radiative heating and cooling, and runs four radiation-hydrodynamic simulations around an accreting white dwarf. The result is that the thermal treatment does not change the overall picture: the predicted winds remain overionized, the mass-loss rates stay below $10^{-5}$ of the accretion rate, and the synthetic ultraviolet spectra still lack the strong C IV and N V wind lines seen in real systems. The authors conclude that the line-driving efficiency problem is not removed by a more detailed treatment of thermodynamics.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the coupled radiation-hydrodynamic loop: a Godunov-type hydrodynamics code advances the ideal-gas energy equation, while a Monte Carlo radiative transfer code supplies the radiation field, ionization state, heating and cooling rates, and direction-dependent ultraviolet fluxes. From these, a force multiplier $M(t)$ is computed with an independent line-list code containing more than 450,000 transitions, and the radiative acceleration is assembled as a sum over 36 directions using $g_i = [1+M(t_i)]\sigma_e F_{UV,i}/c$, with the optical-depth parameter $t_i$ depending on the local velocity gradient and thermal velocity. The temperature structure that emerges near the Mach 1 surface, roughly $5\times10^4$ K, is close to the $4\times10^4$ K assumed in the isothermal runs, and that closeness is the direct reason the two treatments give similar winds.

What would settle it

Re-run the fiducial simulation with time-dependent (non-equilibrium) ionization and recombination instead of instantaneous equilibrium; if the accelerating wind freezes into lower ionization stages and $\dot{M}_{\rm wind}/\dot{M}_{\rm acc}$ rises above $10^{-5}$ with strong C IV and N V absorption in the synthetic spectra, the overionization conclusion would be overturned.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Relaxing the isothermal approximation in Monte Carlo radiation-hydrodynamic simulations of line-driven disc winds around accreting white dwarfs does not alter the conclusions drawn from isothermal models. With an ideal gas equation of state and the full energy equation solved alongside frequency-dependent radiative transfer and ionization equilibrium, the wind that develops is still overionized in its launching region: the force multiplier reaches only a few hundred rather than the near-optimal few thousand, the dominant driving species are strong oxygen lines rather than the many weak iron lines that drive hot-star winds, and the wind mass-loss rate remains about two orders of magnitude below the values from older CAK-style simulations. The temperature near the sonic surface turns out to be close to the $40\,000$ K assumed in the isothermal runs, which is why the two approaches agree. Testing two different radiative-transfer modes produces the same outcome, indicating the result is not sensitive to the transfer mode either.

Load-bearing premise

The overionization conclusion rests on assuming that the disc radiates like a standard Shakura-Sunyaev blackbody-annuli spectrum with no central source and that ionization is always in instantaneous equilibrium; if the real spectrum is softer or ionization freezes into lower stages in fast-flowing gas, the driving could be much stronger.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The isothermal approximation was not the source of the weak winds; solving the full energy equation leaves the wind mass-loss rate within a factor of two of the isothermal models.
  • The line-driving efficiency problem is confirmed: the predicted $\dot{M}_{\rm wind}/\dot{M}_{\rm acc} < 10^{-5}$ is about one hundred times lower than earlier CAK-style simulations.
  • Synthetic ultraviolet spectra remain inconsistent with observations of high-state accreting white dwarfs such as RW Sex and IX Vel, with C IV, N V, and Si IV resonance lines weak or absent.
  • With the thermal treatment now included, the same simulation framework can be applied to line-driven disc winds in AGN, where the more complex SEDs make the isothermal approximation less reliable.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If overionization in the simulations is an artifact of assuming instantaneous ionization equilibrium, then including time-dependent recombination might restore lower ionization stages and stronger line acceleration in fast-moving regions; the paper itself notes that such freeze-in may occur.
  • The observed strong ultraviolet wind lines in high-state accreting white dwarfs imply that real outflows avoid overionization, so some combination of a softer-than-assumed disc SED, sub-grid wind clumping, or an additional driving mechanism such as magnetic fields is likely needed.
  • A direct numerical test of this would be to rerun the fiducial model with a reduced ionizing flux and check whether the mass-loss rate rises above $10^{-5}$ and the ultraviolet lines appear, which would show that line-driving can work despite the fiducial overionization.
  • The factor-of-two difference in mass-loss rate between the two radiative-transfer modes is smaller than the intrinsic time variability of the winds, suggesting that comparisons with observations will be limited by variability rather than transfer details.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents four Monte-Carlo radiation hydrodynamic simulations of line-driven winds from accreting white dwarfs, crossing the equation of state (ideal gas vs isothermal) with two radiative transfer modes (Hybrid macro-atom and Classic). The main result is that all four models produce nearly identical wind geometries and mass-loss rates (within a factor of ~2), with Mdot_wind ≈ 6 × 10^-14 M_sun/yr (Mdot_wind/Mdot_acc < 10^-5), confirming the earlier finding that detailed multidimensional ionization and radiative transfer suppress line-driving relative to CAK-style simulations. The temperature near the sonic surface is ≈5 × 10^4 K, similar to the assumed isothermal value of 4 × 10^4 K, explaining the insensitivity. Synthetic UV spectra show weak resonance lines compared to observed AWD winds. The authors conclude that relaxing the isothermal approximation does not change the overionization problem.

Significance. This is a valuable technical contribution: it is the first line-driven wind RHD simulation with an ideal-gas equation of state and full energy equation, and the first to use the macro-atom formalism in this context. The 2×2 comparison cleanly isolates the effect of the thermodynamic treatment and the radiative transfer mode. The code is publicly archived, and the paper includes numerous parameter-sensitivity tests (ΔT_RAD, N_hat, rho_d, domain size, damping). If the results are robust, they strengthen the case that line-driven winds in AWDs are weak and overionized, with implications for AGN. The main caveat, detailed below, is that the simulations do not test whether a different dynamical branch (a self-shielded strong wind) exists.

major comments (1)
  1. [§2.6 and §3] All four simulations are initialized from a zero-velocity hydrostatic configuration (Eq. 21 with v_r = v_θ = 0) and evolve to a single quasi-steady state. The paper does not test alternate initial conditions. This matters because line-driven disc winds can exhibit bistability: a self-shielded, high-density strong wind can coexist with the weak/failed wind for the same external parameters, since higher density increases recombination, lowers ionization, and boosts the force multiplier. The launch-region force multiplier is only M ≈ a few × 100 (Fig. 6, §3.2), just above the threshold for driving, and the paper itself notes that observed AWD outflows do manage to avoid over-ionization (§4). If a strong branch exists and is stable under the MC-RHD treatment, the central conclusion that line-driving produces only overionized weak winds would be incomplete or incorrect. I recommend adding a simulation that initializes the flow with a wind-like density/velocity structure (e.g., taken from a CAK-style model, or by temporarily boosting the radiation force) to see whether the flow converges to the same branch. This is a load-bearing test for the claim in the abstract that the predicted outflows are too highly ionized.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§2.6] The sentence 'Is also acts as a proof-of-concept' should read 'It also acts as a proof-of-concept.'
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] Typo: 'bottem-rightpanel' should be 'bottom-right panel.'
  3. [Fig. 6 caption] Typo: 'Much 1 surface' should be 'Mach 1 surface.'
  4. [§2.4] In the text after Eq. (12), 'represents the the Doppler width' has a duplicated 'the.'
  5. [§2.3] Equation (9) uses 'Thompson' but the correct spelling is 'Thomson' (as in Thomson scattering).
  6. [§3.2 and Fig. 5] The comparison of synthetic spectra with observed AWD spectra is qualitative ('weak or absent'); a quantitative measure, such as predicted equivalent widths or column densities for the resonance lines, would make the claim that the simulations fail to reproduce the observed UV wind signatures more precise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's central claim is a forward RHD simulation output comparing ideal-gas and isothermal treatments, checked internally across four runs and externally against observed UV spectra; self-citations form a code lineage that is publicly archived and not load-bearing in a circular sense.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. The inputs — M_WD, Mdot_acc = pi x 10^-8 Msun/yr, midplane density rho_d = 10^-9 g cm^-3, and the Shakura-Sunyaev disc SED (Eqs. 6-7) — are physically motivated and explicitly subjected to sensitivity tests (footnote 2 for Delta_t_RAD; Section 2.6 for rho_d variations and an r_max = 50 r_WD domain test), not tuned to yield the reported low mass-loss rates. The central outputs (Mdot_wind via Eq. 22, temperature structure in Fig. 4, ionization state, force multiplier M ~ few x 100 in Fig. 6, and synthetic spectra in Fig. 5) are computed products of the coupled Pluto-Sirocco evolution. The force multiplier is obtained from a 450,000-line atomic treatment following Parkin & Sim (2013), not from a fitted CAK k-alpha law; the analytic heating/cooling scalings (Eqs. 15-20) are explicitly recalibrated after every Sirocco call to match the actual Monte-Carlo rates, with damping-factor robustness tested, so the thermal equilibrium is set by the radiative transfer calculation rather than by the interpolation formulas. The key comparison (ideal-gas Model A vs isothermal Model B, and Hybrid vs Classic modes) is performed internally across four runs, with Model D reproducing the prior HK22D benchmark. The conclusion that the predicted winds do not reproduce observed UV wind signatures is tested against external spectra of RW Sex and IX Vel (Fig. 5). Self-citations (Higginbottom et al. 2024, 2018; Matthews et al. 2025) supply the code lineage; Sirocco is publicly archived (Zenodo DOI:10.5281/zenodo.15792686), and the central over-ionization claim is re-derived here with new physics (full energy equation, macro-atom mode) rather than assumed from prior work. The reviewer-flagged branch-selection concern (all runs initialize from hydrostatic, zero-velocity states per Section 2.6, so a self-shielded strong-wind branch is never probed) is a legitimate robustness limitation — and the paper itself discloses the breakdown of instantaneous ionization equilibrium in Section 3.1 — but it is a correctness/initial-condition risk, not circularity, since the weak branch is an emergent attractor of the coupled equations, not encoded in the inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or entities; all ingredients are standard astrophysical assumptions about gas, radiation, and atomic data. The main assumptions are modeling choices (SED, ionization equilibrium, 2.5D symmetry) rather than invented physics.

free parameters (4)
  • Accretion rate Mdot_acc = pi x 10^-8 M_sun/yr
    Chosen as the high end of the range for nova-like variables; sets the disc luminosity and photon field that drive the wind. Not fitted to observations, but a hand-chosen boundary condition.
  • Midplane density rho_d = 10^-9 g cm^-3
    Chosen so the sonic point falls inside the grid while the dense disc is not optically thick; insensitivity tested by factors of two and by an SSD density model.
  • Isothermal reference temperature (Models B and D) = 40,000 K
    Fixed reference temperature inherited from Higginbottom et al. 2024; serves as the comparison baseline rather than a fitted target.
  • Mean molecular weight mu = 0.6
    Standard assumption for ionized cosmic abundance gas, used in the initial sound speed and hydrostatic density setup.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Ideal gas equation of state p = n k_B T with gamma = 5/3 for a monatomic gas.
    Adopted to relax the isothermal approximation; assumes a single-temperature ideal gas throughout the wind (Section 2.1).
  • domain assumption Newtonian gravitational potential Phi = -G M_WD / r, no relativistic effects.
    Appropriate for a 0.6 M_sun white dwarf; ignores general relativistic corrections (Section 2.1).
  • domain assumption Disc SED from Shakura-Sunyaev blackbody annuli with no central source; disc is geometrically thin.
    The only net radiation source is the accretion disc, considered the most optimistic assumption for line driving (Sections 2.2 and 2.6).
  • domain assumption Instantaneous ionization equilibrium in Sirocco when computing ionization state and heating/cooling.
    Paper acknowledges breakdown where flow time is shorter than recombination time in finger-like structures (Section 3.1).
  • domain assumption Analytic heating/cooling scaling laws from Blondin 1994 and Higginbottom et al. 2018 are used to interpolate rates between Sirocco calls, with K prefactors recalibrated to Sirocco.
    The scalings are assumed to have correct temperature, density, and ionization dependence even for non-bremsstrahlung SEDs (Section 2.5).
  • domain assumption Axisymmetry and reflection symmetry: the computational domain covers one quadrant (0 to pi/2), making the simulations 2.5D.
    The simulations ignore azimuthal structure and assume mirror symmetry about the midplane (Section 2.6).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Monte-Carlo radiation hydrodynamic simulations of line-driven disc winds: relaxing the isothermal approximation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ODW5D2XF

@misc{pith2026250705085,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Monte-Carlo radiation hydrodynamic simulations of line-driven disc winds: relaxing the isothermal approximation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ODW5D2XF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05085}
}
read the original abstract

Disc winds play a crucial role in many accreting astrophysical systems across all scales. In accreting white dwarfs (AWDs) and active galactic nuclei (AGN), radiation pressure on spectral lines is a promising wind-driving mechanism. However, the efficiency of line driving is extremely sensitive to the ionization state of the flow, making it difficult to construct a reliable physical picture of these winds. Recently, we presented the first radiation-hydrodynamic (RHD) simulations for AWDs that incorporated detailed, multi-dimensional ionization calculations via fully frequency-dependent radiative transfer, using the Sirocco code coupled to PLUTO. These simulations produced much weaker line-driven winds (Mdot_wind / Mdot_acc < 1e-5 for our adopted parameters) than earlier studies using more approximate treatments of ionization and radiative transfer (which yielded Mdot_wind / Mdot_acc ~ 1e-4). One remaining limitation of our work was the assumption of an isothermal outflow. Here, we relax this by adopting an ideal gas equation of state and explicitly solving for the multi-dimensional temperature structure of the flow. In the AWD setting, accounting for the thermal state of the wind does not change the overall conclusions drawn from the isothermal approximation. Our new simulations confirm the line-driving efficiency problem: the predicted outflows are too highly ionized, meaning they neither create optimal driving conditions nor reproduce the observed ultraviolet wind signatures. Possible solutions include wind clumping on sub-grid scales, a softer-than-expected spectral energy distribution, or additional driving mechanisms. With the physics now built into our simulations, we are well-equipped to also explore line-driven disc winds in AGN.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.05085 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The density and poloidal velocity fields for the fiducial model at 𝑡 = 850 s are shown. The colormap depicts the logarithmic density, while overlaid velocity vectors (normalized to a peak poloidal velocity of 𝑣𝑝 = 1500 km s−1 ) illustrate the flow structure. Grey lines denote streamlines, and the solid black line marks the Mach 1 surface. For a version of the figure with logarithmically scaled 𝑥 and 𝑧 axes, see the … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The density and poloidal velocity fields for Model A (top-left panel), Model B (top-right panel), Model C (bottom-left panel), and Model D (bottem￾right panel; similar to Model HK22D of Higginbottom et al. 2024) at 𝑡 = 850 s. The colourmap represent the logarithmic density, while overlaid velocity vectors (normalized to a peak poloidal velocity of 𝑣𝑝 = 1500 km s−1 ) illustrate the flow structure. Grey lines denote s… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The time evolution of the wind mass-loss rate (𝑀¤ wind) through the outer boundary for all four models. A vertical dash-dotted line marks the timestamp corresponding to the representative snapshot shown in subsequent figures. The high-density disc region is excluded in the calculation of 𝑀¤ wind [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Two-dimensional temperature distribution from Pluto hydrodynamic simulation snapshot of our fiducial model, shown on a logarithmic color scale. The Mach 1 surface is indicated by the solid black line. Near this surface, temperatures reach a peak of 𝑇 ≈ 5 × 104 K, in go…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Synthetic UV spectra generated from a snapshot of the fiducial model for a range of inclination angles using Sirocco. We also show the ultraviolet spectra of two proto-typical high-state AWDs: RW Sex (𝑖 ≃ 30◦ ) and IX Vel (𝑖 ≃ 65◦ ). The spectra are normalized such tha…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Top panels: Left panel displays the density map with logarithmic axes, middle panel presents the distribution of the force multiplier (M), right panel illustrates the mean ionization state of oxygen in our fiducial model. The solid black line marks the location of the …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How massive and clumpy must a quasar wind be to create emission line blueshifts?

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Blueshifted C IV emission in quasars requires wind mass-loading ϵ_w/f_V ∼ 50, disfavouring smooth disc winds in favour of clumpy or ambient-swept outflows.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    Arav N., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177447 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...465..617A 465, 617

    work page doi:10.1086/177447 1996

  3. [3]

    T., Barlow T

    Arav N., Korista K. T., Barlow T. A., Begelman 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1038/376576a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995Natur.376..576A 376, 576

    work page doi:10.1038/376576a0 1995

  4. [4]

    D., Payne D

    Blandford R. D., Payne D. G., 1982, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/199.4.883 , 199, 883

    doi:10.1093/mnras/199.4.883 1982

  5. [5]

    M., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174853 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...435..756B 435, 756

    Blondin J. M., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/174853 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994ApJ...435..756B 435, 756

    work page doi:10.1086/174853 1994

  6. [6]

    I., Abbott D

    Castor J. I., Abbott D. C., Klein R. I., 1975, @doi [ ] 10.1086/153315 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975ApJ...195..157C 195, 157

    doi:10.1086/153315 1975

  7. [7]

    Castro Segura N., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-021-04324-2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022Natur.603...52C 603, 52

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04324-2 2022

  8. [8]

    D \' az Trigo M., Boirin L., 2016, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.201612315 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AN....337..368D 337, 368

    doi:10.1002/asna.201612315 2016

Show all 74 references
  1. [9]

    E., Proga D., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1016/S1387-6473(00)00007-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000NewAR..44...21D 44, 21

    Drew J. E., Proga D., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1016/S1387-6473(00)00007-5 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000NewAR..44...21D 44, 21

    2000 doi

  2. [10]

    Drew J., Verbunt F., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/213.2.191 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985MNRAS.213..191D 213, 191

    1985 doi

  3. [11]

    Dyda S., Proga D., 2018a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty030 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.475.3786D 475, 3786

    doi

  4. [12]

    Dyda S., Proga D., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1257 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.5006D 478, 5006

    doi

  5. [13]

    W., Proga D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.5143D 530, 5143

    Dyda S., Davis S. W., Proga D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530.5143D 530, 5143

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    C., Kallman T

    Dyda S., Dannen R. C., Kallman T. R., Davis S. W., Proga D., 2025, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2504.00117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250400117D p. arXiv:2504.00117

    2025 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    S., 1916, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/77.1.16 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1916MNRAS..77...16E 77, 16

    Eddington A. S., 1916, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/77.1.16 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1916MNRAS..77...16E 77, 16

    1916 doi

  8. [16]

    C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ARA&A..50..455F 50, 455

    Fabian A. C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ARA&A..50..455F 50, 455

    2012 doi

  9. [17]

    Fabrika S., Ueda Y., Vinokurov A., Sholukhova O., Shidatsu M., 2015, @doi [Nature Physics] 10.1038/nphys3348 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015NatPh..11..551F 11, 551

    2015 doi

  10. [18]

    Filbert S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae1610 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.532.3669F 532, 3669

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    S., Long K

    Froning C. S., Long K. S., G \"a nsicke B., Szkody P., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/199/1/7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJS..199....7F 199, 7

    2012 doi

  12. [20]

    G., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176492 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...454..410G 454, 410

    Gayley K. G., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/176492 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...454..410G 454, 410

    1995 doi

  13. [21]

    R., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/758 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...692..758G 692, 758

    Gibson R. R., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/758 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...692..758G 692, 758

    2009 doi

  14. [22]

    M., Costa T., Tadhunter C

    Harrison C. M., Costa T., Tadhunter C. N., Fl \"u tsch A., Kakkad D., Perna M., Vietri G., 2018, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0403-6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2..198H 2, 198

    2018 doi

  15. [23]

    Higginbottom N., Proga D., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/107 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...807..107H 807, 107

    2015 doi

  16. [24]

    S., Sim S

    Higginbottom N., Knigge C., Long K. S., Sim S. A., Matthews J. H., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1658 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.1390H 436, 1390

    2013 doi

  17. [25]

    S., Matthews J

    Higginbottom N., Proga D., Knigge C., Long K. S., Matthews J. H., Sim S. A., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/19 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...789...19H 789, 19

    2014 doi

  18. [26]

    S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/42 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836...42H 836, 42

    Higginbottom N., Proga D., Knigge C., Long K. S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/42 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836...42H 836, 42

    2017 doi

  19. [27]

    S., Matthews J

    Higginbottom N., Knigge C., Long K. S., Matthews J. H., Sim S. A., Hewitt H. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1599 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479.3651H 479, 3651

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    S., Matthews J

    Higginbottom N., Knigge C., Long K. S., Matthews J. H., Parkinson E. J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz310 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.484.4635H 484, 4635

    2019 doi

  21. [29]

    S., Matthews J

    Higginbottom N., Scepi N., Knigge C., Long K. S., Matthews J. H., Sim S. A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3830 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.9236H 527, 9236

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    B., Mason E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aadd13 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..198H 156, 198

    Howell S. B., Mason E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aadd13 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..198H 156, 198

    2018 doi

  23. [31]

    King A., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/379143 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...596L..27K 596, L27

    2003 doi

  24. [32]

    T., Voit G

    Korista K. T., Voit G. M., Morris S. L., Weymann R. J., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191825 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJS...88..357K 88, 357

    1993 doi

  25. [33]

    P., Gan Z., Yang X., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1139 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.434.1721L 434, 1721

    Liu C., Yuan F., Ostriker J. P., Gan Z., Yang X., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1139 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.434.1721L 434, 1721

    2013 doi

  26. [34]

    S., Knigge C., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/342879 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...579..725L 579, 725

    Long K. S., Knigge C., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/342879 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...579..725L 579, 725

    2002 doi

  27. [35]

    Lu W.-J., Lin Y.-R., 2018, arXiv e-prints

    2018

  28. [36]

    B., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011756 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...384..725L 384, 725

    Lucy L. B., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011756 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A&A...384..725L 384, 725

    2002 doi

  29. [37]

    B., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030357 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...403..261L 403, 261

    Lucy L. B., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20030357 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A&A...403..261L 403, 261

    2003 doi

  30. [38]

    B., Solomon P

    Lucy L. B., Solomon P. M., 1970, @doi [ ] 10.1086/150365 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1970ApJ...159..879L 159, 879

    1970 doi

  31. [39]

    Mas-Ribas L., Mauland R., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4efd , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...886..151M 886, 151

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    Mata S \'a nchez D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2402 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.2646M 481, 2646

    2018 doi

  33. [41]

    H., Knigge C., Long K

    Matthews J. H., Knigge C., Long K. S., Sim S. A., Higginbottom N., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv867 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.450.3331M 450, 3331

    2015 doi

  34. [42]

    H., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2677 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536..879M 536, 879

    Matthews J. H., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stae2677 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536..879M 536, 879

    2025 doi

  35. [43]

    J., Walton D

    Middleton M. J., Walton D. J., Roberts T. P., Heil L., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slt157 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438L..51M 438, L51

    2014 doi

  36. [44]

    J., Higginbottom N., Knigge C., Khan N., Wiktorowicz G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2991 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509.1119M 509, 1119

    Middleton M. J., Higginbottom N., Knigge C., Khan N., Wiktorowicz G., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2991 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.509.1119M 509, 1119

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    Mignone A., Bodo G., Massaglia S., Matsakos T., Tesileanu O., Zanni C., Ferrari A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/513316 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..170..228M 170, 228

    2007 doi

  38. [46]

    M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/821/1/L9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821L...9M 821, L9

    Miller J. M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/821/1/L9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821L...9M 821, L9

    2016 doi

  39. [47]

    Morganti R., 2017, @doi [Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences] 10.3389/fspas.2017.00042 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017FrASS...4...42M 4, 42

    2017

  40. [48]

    P., Zeraatgari F

    Mosallanezhad A., Yuan F., Ostriker J. P., Zeraatgari F. Z., Bu D.-F., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2758 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.490.2567M 490, 2567

    2019 doi

  41. [49]

    Z., Hai Y., Mei L., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9379 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...939...12M 939, 12

    Mosallanezhad A., Bu D.-F., C emelji \'c M., Zeraatgari F. Z., Hai Y., Mei L., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9379 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...939...12M 939, 12

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    Mu \ n oz-Darias T., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab2768 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...879L...4M 879, L4

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    M., Sim S

    Noebauer U. M., Sim S. A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1849 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453.3120N 453, 3120

    2015 doi

  44. [52]

    Nomura M., Ohsuga K., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2877 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.2873N 465, 2873

    2017 doi

  45. [53]

    R., Wada K., Yoshida T., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psv124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PASJ...68...16N 68, 16

    Nomura M., Ohsuga K., Takahashi H. R., Wada K., Yoshida T., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psv124 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PASJ...68...16N 68, 16

    2016 doi

  46. [54]

    Nomura M., Ohsuga K., Done C., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa948 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.494.3616N 494, 3616

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    R., Sim S

    Parkin E. R., Sim S. A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/114 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767..114P 767, 114

    2013 doi

  48. [56]

    A., Kallman T

    Pereyra N. A., Kallman T. R., Blondin J. M., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/303671 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...477..368P 477, 368

    1997 doi

  49. [57]

    A., Kallman T

    Pereyra N. A., Kallman T. R., Blondin J. M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308527 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...532..563P 532, 563

    2000 doi

  50. [58]

    P., Begelman M

    Ponti G., Fender R. P., Begelman M. C., Dunn R. J. H., Neilsen J., Coriat M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01224.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.422L..11P 422, L11

    2012

  51. [59]

    Proga D., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/377349 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...592L...9P 592, L9

    2003 doi

  52. [60]

    R., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/425117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...616..688P 616, 688

    Proga D., Kallman T. R., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/425117 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...616..688P 616, 688

    2004 doi

  53. [61]

    M., Drew J

    Proga D., Stone J. M., Drew J. E., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01337.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998MNRAS.295..595P 295, 595

    1998

  54. [62]

    M., Drew J

    Proga D., Stone J. M., Drew J. E., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02935.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.310..476P 310, 476

    1999

  55. [63]

    M., Kallman T

    Proga D., Stone J. M., Kallman T. R., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...543..686P 543, 686

    2000 doi

  56. [64]

    R., Drew J

    Proga D., Kallman T. R., Drew J. E., Hartley L. E., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/340339 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...572..382P 572, 382

    2002 doi

  57. [65]

    Scepi N., Dubus G., Lesur G., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834781 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...626A.116S 626, A116

    2019 doi

  58. [66]

    I., Sunyaev R

    Shakura N. I., Sunyaev R. A., 1973, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973A&A....24..337S 24, 337

    1973

  59. [67]

    J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9801013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...331L...1S 331, L1

    Silk J., Rees M. J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9801013 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...331L...1S 331, L1

    1998 doi arXiv

  60. [68]

    A., Drew J

    Sim S. A., Drew J. E., Long K. S., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09472.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.363..615S 363, 615

    2005

  61. [69]

    A., Proga D., Miller L., Long K

    Sim S. A., Proga D., Miller L., Long K. S., Turner T. J., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17215.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.408.1396S 408, 1396

    2010

  62. [70]

    R., Kallman T

    Stevens I. R., Kallman T. R., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/169486 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990ApJ...365..321S 365, 321

    1990 doi

  63. [71]

    E., Lasota J

    Tetarenko B. E., Lasota J. P., Heinke C. O., Dubus G., Sivakoff G. R., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature25159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.554...69T 554, 69

    2018 doi

  64. [72]

    Tomaru R., Done C., Ohsuga K., Odaka H., Takahashi T., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2254 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.497.4970T 497, 4970

    2020 doi

  65. [73]

    S., de Koter A., Lamers H

    Vink J. S., de Koter A., Lamers H. J. G. L. M., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9908196 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&A...350..181V 350, 181

    1999 doi arXiv

  66. [74]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.