Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Multi-species McKean-Vlasov dynamics in non-convex landscapes

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that multi-species McKean-Vlasov systems satisfying a structural assumption undergo a phase transition: a unique stationary state at high noise, and exactly three stationary states of product form at low noise, with the…

desk verdict Solid multi-species McKean-Vlasov paper with a genuine convergence section, but the headline phase-transition theorem rests on a structural assumption that, as written, makes all species identical; the typo needs fixing and the single-species reduction needs to be stated honestly. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07617 v2 pith:H6VLN4VJ submitted 2025-07-10 math.PR math-phmath.APmath.MP

Manh Hong Duong , Grigorios A. Pavliotis , Julian Tugaut This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.APmath.MP MSC 60H1035K5560J6060G10
keywords multi-speciesMcKean-Vlasovequationsphasetransitionnon-convexconfiningpotentialsDesai-Zwanzigmodelpropagationofchaosstationarystatesfreeenergyself-consistency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies systems of many interacting particles of several species in a non-convex landscape, in the limit of infinite population size. It shows that under a structural assumption aligning the confining and interaction potentials with the noise strengths, every species' stationary law is the same as that of a single-species Desai–Zwanzig model with an effective potential. The central result is a phase transition: there is a critical noise level $\sigma_c$ such that for $\sigma \ge \sigma_c$ there is a unique stationary state, while for $\sigma < \sigma_c$ there are exactly three, corresponding to zero, positive, and negative global magnetization. The critical value is given by equation (30), equating the stationary variance at zero magnetization to $\sigma_c^2/(2\alpha_1)$. The paper also constructs a free-energy Lyapunov functional under a symmetry assumption and proves convergence of the PDE solutions to a stationary state.

What carries the argument

The central object is the structural assumption (Assumption 1.4) which forces the multi-species evolution to collapse onto a single-species Desai-Zwanzig generator $L$ with an effective potential $\bar{V}$; this reduces the infinite-dimensional fixed-point problem for stationary states to a finite-dimensional self-consistency equation for the magnetization $A$. The phase-transition proof relies on the series-expansion technique of Tugaut for the function $\psi(A)$, while the small-noise existence result uses Laplace's method and Schauder's fixed-point theorem in parallelepipeds $C_\sigma(m_0,\lambda)$. For convergence, the machinery is the free-energy functional $$\Upsilon_\$\sigma$(\mu) = \sum_{k=1}^M a_k \left(\frac{\$sigma_k^{2}$}{2}\int \mu_k\log\mu_k\,dx + \int V_k\mu_k\,dx\right) + \frac{1}{2}\sum_{k,\ell=1}^M a_k a_\ell \iint F_{k\ell}(x-y)\mu_k(x)\mu_\ell(y)\,dx\,dy,$$ which is shown to be non-increasing and lower-bounded, with its dissipation vanishing exactly at stationary states.

What would settle it

Take the simplest case of the paper—all species identical with $V(x)=x^4/4-x^2/2$ and a single interaction coefficient $\alpha>0$—and compute the stationary variance at zero magnetization; equation (30) predicts a critical noise $\sigma_c$ satisfying $\mathrm{Var}_{\sigma_c} = \sigma_c^2/(2\alpha)$. For $\sigma$ just below this $\sigma_c$, the self-consistency equation (31) should have exactly three solutions ($A=0$ and a nonzero pair), and a numerical simulation of the mean-field PDE should show the symmetric state losing linear stability precisely at $\sigma_c$. If the observed bifurcation point does not match equation (30), the quantitative phase-transition claim would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that for the multi-species McKean-Vlasov PDE system with quadratic interactions, under the structural assumption that $V_i/\sigma_i^2 = V_1/\sigma_1^2$ and $\alpha_{ij}/\sigma_i^2 = \alpha_{1j}/\sigma_j^2$ for all $i,j$, the generator of each species is a multiple of a common single-species Desai-Zwanzig generator. Consequently, all stationary states are of the product form $\mu_\sigma \otimes \dots \otimes \mu_\sigma$, and the self-consistency equations reduce to a single equation for the magnetization $A$. Theorem 3.2 shows that there exists a critical noise $\sigma_c$, uniquely determined by $$\frac{\int_{\mathbb{R}} $x^{2}$ \exp\{-\frac{2}{\$sigma_c^{2}$} V_0(x)\}\ dx}{\int_{\mathbb{R}} \exp\{-\frac{2}{\$sigma_c^{2}$} V_0(x)\}\ dx} = \frac{\$sigma_c^{2}$}{2\alpha_1},$$ such that for $\sigma \ge \sigma_c$ there is a unique stationary state ($A=0$), while for $\sigma < \sigma_c$ there are exactly three stationary states ($A=0$, $A>0$, $A<0$). The paper further proves well-posedness and propagation of chaos, existence of stationary states near small-noise candidates, uniqueness at large noise, linear stability of the stationary states, and convergence of time-dependent solutions to stationary states using a free-energy functional under the symmetry assumption $\alpha_{ij}=\alpha_{ji}$.

Load-bearing premise

The multi-species phase-transition theorem rests on the assumption that all species' confining potentials and interaction coefficients, after dividing by their noise strengths, are the same common potential and common coefficients; if that fails, the paper offers no multi-species phase-transition result.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any multi-species population whose parameters satisfy the structural assumption, the long-time behavior is governed by a single effective single-species Desai-Zwanzig model, so all existing one-species phase-transition intuition applies unchanged.
  • The explicit critical-noise formula (30) allows one to compute, from the shape of the confining potential and the first-species interaction coefficient, whether a given multi-species system will exhibit bistability and spontaneous magnetization at low noise.
  • Under the symmetry assumption $\alpha_{ij}=\alpha_{ji}$, the free energy decreases along every trajectory and its limit equals the free energy of the stationary state reached, ruling out periodic or recurrent behavior in the mean-field PDE system.
  • If the set of stationary states at each free-energy level is discrete, Corollary 5.3 guarantees that every solution converges to a single invariant measure, not just a set of limit points.
  • In the small-noise regime, Proposition 3.4 guarantees existence of stationary states near each solution of the algebraic candidate equations (24), so counting the solutions of those algebraic equations counts the stationary states of the PDE system.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The structural assumption is restrictive: it forces all species to see the same effective landscape. The paper does not address whether a phase transition can occur when the assumption is slightly violated; that is an open question, and the two-species algebraic analysis in Appendix A hints that nontrivial phenomena can appear without it.
  • The reduction to a common generator suggests a general principle: any multi-species model whose species generators are multiples of a common generator will inherit the phase-transition diagram of that common generator, regardless of the number of species and their proportions.
  • The small-noise existence proof via a fixed point in parallelepipeds of width proportional to $\sigma_k$ can be turned into a numerical continuation method: solve the algebraic candidate equations (24) and then refine within each parallelepiped to locate all stationary states for small noise.
  • The free-energy convergence results likely extend to non-quadratic interaction potentials, since Section 2.4 and the technical lemma in Appendix C are formulated for general potentials; a testable extension would replace the quadratic self-consistency equations with moment-based fixed-point equations for polynomial interactions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies M-species McKean-Vlasov systems with quadratic interactions in non-convex landscapes. It states well-posedness of the many-particle and mean-field SDEs (Theorem 2.1), propagation of chaos (Theorem 2.2), a Gibbs characterization of stationary states (Proposition 2.3), small-noise existence of stationary states (Proposition 3.4), large-noise uniqueness (Theorem 3.1), a phase-transition result under a structural assumption (Theorem 3.2), linear stability of the reduced Desai-Zwanzig-type model (Proposition 4.1), and convergence of solutions and free energy to stationary states under a symmetry assumption (Section 5). The main advertised novelty is the extension of one-species and two-species results to arbitrary M.

Significance. The paper contains several substantial multi-species results: the Gibbs characterization (Proposition 2.3), the small-noise fixed-point construction (Proposition 3.4), and the convergence analysis in Section 5 are carefully developed and appear technically sound. The explicit critical equation (30), the immigration example (Example 3.1), and the algebraic study in Appendix A are useful contributions. The main limitation is that the phase-transition theorem rests on Assumption 1.4, which as displayed collapses the system to M identical copies; even after the likely typographical correction, the result is a reduction to the single-species Desai-Zwanzig model rather than a genuinely multi-species phase transition. The manuscript should be revised to correct this load-bearing assumption, supply the missing proof details for the phase transition, and align the presentation with the actual content of the theorems.

major comments (4)
  1. [1.3.1 / Theorem 3.2] Assumption 1.4 as displayed, alpha_{ij}/sigma_i^2 = alpha_{1j}/sigma_j^2 and V_i/sigma_i^2 = V_1/sigma_1^2, is not the condition used in Remark 1.1 or in the proof of Theorem 3.2. Setting i = j gives alpha_{jj} = alpha_{1j}, and setting i = 1 gives sigma_j = sigma_1 for all j; hence all sigma_i, V_i and alpha_{ij} are identical and the system consists of M identical copies. The intended scaling appears to be alpha_{ij}/sigma_i^2 = alpha_{1j}/sigma_1^2, equivalently alpha_{ij}/sigma_i^2 = alpha_j/sigma^2, which is used in equations (9)-(10), in Section A.1, and in the proof of Theorem 3.2. Because Theorem 3.2 and Proposition 4.1 rest entirely on this assumption, the manuscript must correct Assumption 1.4 and verify that all subsequent identities hold under the corrected version; the current displayed version either trivializes the claimed multi-species phase transition or is a misstatement.
  2. [3.3 / Theorem 3.2] The proof of Theorem 3.2, after reducing to the one-species equation (31), says that by following the steps of [Tug14a, Theorem 2.1] it is straightforward to show the monotonicity of psi and the existence of exactly three solutions, and that the critical value is characterized by (30). No details are given. Since the exact number of stationary states and the uniqueness of sigma_c are central claims, the manuscript should either provide a complete proof or state precisely which theorem of [Tug14a] is being invoked and verify all of its hypotheses under Assumptions 3.3 and 3.4. As written, the assertions about exactly three stationary states and the uniqueness of the critical value are not demonstrated in the paper.
  3. [4 / Eq. (32)] Equation (32), the linearization of the multi-species McKean-Vlasov system, contains an index error: in the first convolution term, the perturbation under the sum over j is written as mu_t^{L,i} rather than mu_t^{L,j}. The correct linearization of (5) has sum_j a_j grad F_{ij} * mu_t^{L,j} multiplied by mu_infty^i. This error propagates into the derivation of the linearized system (33) and affects the null-space and stability claims in Proposition 4.1; the equation must be corrected and the subsequent analysis checked.
  4. [2.1 / Theorem 2.1] Theorem 2.1 asserts existence and uniqueness of strong solutions for the multi-species McKean SDE system, but the proof is not included: the text states that the extension from M = 2 to M > 2 is immediate and omits the details. Since well-posedness is one of the paper's main results and is used throughout, the authors should either provide the full argument or give a precise statement of which estimates from [DT20] carry over unchanged and which require modification. A one-sentence delegation is not sufficient for a central theorem.
minor comments (4)
  1. [5.1.1 / Proposition 5.7] In the outline of the proof of Theorem 5.1, the statement 'the free energy of (mu_infty^1, ..., mu_infty^M) is equal to L_sigma := lim_{t -> 0} Upsilon_sigma(mu_t^1, ..., mu_t^M)' should read lim_{t -> +infinity}, as used in Lemma 5.6 and Proposition 5.10.
  2. [5 / Proof of Proposition 5.7] In equation (38) and the subsequent integration-by-parts steps, the confining potential is written as V(x) without a species index, while the model has species-dependent potentials V_k. The expressions should use V_ell(x) consistently to match the definition of eta_t^ell and the stationary equation (12).
  3. [Appendix B] In the computation of the Gaussian integrals, the matrix A_2 is written as A_2 = (2/sigma^2)(q + a alpha_21 + (1-a) alpha_21); the coefficient of (1-a) should be alpha_22, consistently with the definition of V_2 and the term B_2.
  4. [3.2 / Eq. (29)] In the proof of Theorem 3.1, the denominator in equation (29) contains the garbled expression 'Akk0'; it should be the linear term A_1 x in the exponent, matching the numerator and the preceding line.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Under Assumption 1.4 the multi-species system reduces to the one-species Desai-Zwanzig model, and Theorem 3.2's phase transition is the known single-species result of [Tug14a] repackaged as a multi-species theorem.

  1. renaming known result [Section 1.3.1, Assumption 1.4 and Remark 1.1, Eqs. (9)-(10)]
    "Assumption 1.4. For any 1 ≤ i, j≤ M , αij/σ_i^2 = α1j/σ_j^2 and Vi/σ_i^2 = V1/σ_1^2. ... The above formula implies that all species have the same stationary distribution, which is the stationary state of the one-species Desai-Zwanzig model with confining potential ¯V that was studied in [Daw83]."

    The structural assumption is introduced precisely so that each species' Fokker-Planck generator is a multiple of one common single-species Desai-Zwanzig generator L*. Eq. (9) writes ∂t μ_i = (σ_i^2/σ^2) L* μ_i, and Remark 1.1 then asserts the conclusion of Theorem 3.2's first part (all species share the same μσ). Thus the product-form statement is built into the assumption by construction. Taken literally, the displayed assumption also forces all σ_i equal: i=j gives α_jj/σ_j^2 = α_1j/σ_j^2, so α_jj=α_1j; then i=1 gives σ_j=σ_1. Hence V_i=V_1 and α_ij=α_1j, making the M-species system M identical copies of the one-species model. The 'multi-species phase transition' is a relabeling of the Desai-Zwanzig model, not a genuinely coupled multi-species phenomenon.

  2. self citation load bearing [Section 3.3, proof of Theorem 3.2, around Eq. (31)]
    "In particular, we have m_k = m_1 = A/α_1. The self-consistency equation becomes A/α_1 = ... (31). This completes the proof of the first part of the theorem. To prove the existence of a phase transition, we apply the techniques developed in the proof of [Tug14a, Theorem 2.1.]."

    After Assumption 1.4 reduces the M self-consistency equations to the single scalar equation (31), the phase-transition analysis is not carried out for the coupled multi-species system; the proof invokes [Tug14a, Theorem 2.1], a one-species result by the third author. Equation (30) for σ_c is exactly the one-species critical equation, and the 'exactly three stationary states' claim is the one-species bifurcation statement. The central phase-transition theorem therefore inherits its entire content from a single-species, coauthored prior result, under an assumption that makes the multi-species system a rescaling of that model.

full rationale

The central phase-transition theorem (Theorem 3.2) is not derived from the coupled multi-species structure. Assumption 1.4 is introduced precisely so that every species' generator is a multiple of one common one-species Desai-Zwanzig generator: Eq. (9) exhibits ∂t μ_i = (σ_i^2/σ^2) L* μ_i, and Remark 1.1 already states that all species have the same stationary distribution. Taken literally, the displayed assumption forces σ_i = σ_1 for all i (set i=j, then i=1), hence V_i = V_1 and α_ij = α_1j, making the M-species system M identical copies of the single-species model; even under the weaker reading used in Remark 1.1, the conclusion is still a common single-species stationary law. The proof of Theorem 3.2 then reduces the self-consistency equations to the scalar equation (31) and imports the phase-transition analysis (critical σ_c and 'exactly three states') from [Tug14a], a one-species paper by the third author. Thus the advertised multi-species phase transition is a repackaging of the known Desai-Zwanzig phase transition, not an independent coupled multi-species result. Other parts of the paper—well-posedness, propagation of chaos, the free-energy construction, and the convergence results—are not circular and appear to be independent contributions; hence the score is 6 rather than higher.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 10 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on a sequence of structural and technical assumptions about the confining potentials, the quadratic interactions, and the noise ratios, many of which are introduced specifically to make the multi-species system tractable. No parameters are fitted to data; the critical noise is determined by equation (30).

assumptions (10)
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.1 (H1-H3): each V_i is C^2, convex at infinity, with polynomial gradient growth.
    Used for existence of strong solutions, moment bounds, and Laplace asymptotics; standard dissipativity and growth conditions.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.2 (H4-H5): F_ij(x)=α_ij |x|^2/2 with α_ii>0.
    Quadratic interactions make stationary-state characterization reduce to finite-dimensional self-consistency equations for the means.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.3: α_ij=α_ji (symmetry).
    Needed for the free-energy functional and gradient-flow structure in Section 2.4 and for convergence Theorem 5.1.
  • ad hoc to paper Assumption 1.4: V_i/σ_i² = V_1/σ_1² and α_ij/σ_i² = α_1j/σ_j² (structural).
    This is the key simplifying assumption; it makes every species generator a multiple of a common generator L (Eqs. 9-10), reducing phase-transition and stability results to the single-species Desai-Zwanzig model.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1.5: θ_k < Σ_ℓ α_kℓ (synchronization).
    Guarantees zero-noise stationary measures are Dirac masses at common or mean positions; used in Corollary 5.4 and Appendix A.
  • ad hoc to paper Assumption 3.1: m0_k is the unique global minimizer of effective potential W_(m0),k.
    Required to apply Laplace's method in Proposition 3.4; the paper argues the assumption is necessary.
  • ad hoc to paper Assumption 3.2: W''_(m0),k(m0_k) > Σ_ℓ a_ℓ |α_kℓ|.
    Technical contraction condition in the small-noise fixed-point proof; authors note it is probably not necessary.
  • domain assumption Assumption 3.3: V_k are even polynomials of specific form with positive leading coefficients.
    Enables the large-noise uniqueness proof via the Tugaut14 moment-ratio argument.
  • domain assumption Assumption 3.4: α_kℓ ≥ 0.
    Used in Theorem 3.1 to compare signs and magnitudes of means; authors note it might be relaxable.
  • standard math Background: Laplace method, Schauder fixed point theorem, Weyl's lemma, and the single-species phase-transition analysis of [Daw83, Tug14a].
    The paper invokes these external results for small-noise asymptotics, fixed points, regularity, and the phase-transition curve.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-species McKean-Vlasov dynamics in non-convex landscapes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H6VLN4VJ

@misc{pith2026250707617,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-species McKean-Vlasov dynamics in non-convex landscapes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H6VLN4VJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07617}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study multi-species stochastic interacting particle systems and their mean-field McKean-Vlasov partial differential equations (PDEs) in non-convex landscapes. Under general assumptions on non-convex confining and interaction potentials with polynomial growth, we establish the well-posedness of the multi-species SDE system, prove propagation of chaos, deriving the corresponding coupled McKean-Vlasov PDE system in the mean-field limit. Our focus is on the long-time and asymptotic behaviour of the mean-field PDEs. For quadratic interaction potentials and under an appropriate structural assumption, which implies that the generator of each species is multiple of a common generator, we show the existence and (non-) uniqueness of stationary solutions, study their linear stability and prove the existence of a phase transition at low noise strengths. For quadratic and symmetric interaction potentials (but no structural assumption), we construct a free-energy functional that plays the role of a Lyapunov function for the mean-field PDE system. Furthermore, we establish the convergence of solutions to the mean-field PDEs (and of their free energy) to a stationary state (and the corresponding free energy).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Global Dynamics of Trait-Structured Generalised Lotka-Volterra Systems with Trait-Independent Interactions

    math.AP 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For trait-structured selection-mutation Lotka-Volterra systems, long-run total population sizes obey the classical generalized Lotka-Volterra ODE, giving rigorous coexistence/extinction and mutation-rate selection results.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Benedetto, E

    D. Benedetto, E. Caglioti, J. A. Carrillo, and M. Pulvirenti. A non- M axwellian steady distribution for one-dimensional granular media. J. Statist. Phys. , 91(5-6):979--990, 1998

    work page 1998

  2. [2]

    Multi-species mean field spin glasses

    Adriano Barra, Pierluigi Contucci, Emanuele Mingione, and Daniele Tantari. Multi-species mean field spin glasses. rigorous results. In Annales Henri Poincar \'e , volume 16, pages 691--708. Springer, 2015

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Metastability in interacting nonlinear stochastic differential equations

    Nils Berglund, Bastien Fernandez, and Barbara Gentz. Metastability in interacting nonlinear stochastic differential equations. I . F rom weak coupling to synchronization. Nonlinearity , 20(11):2551--2581, 2007

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Metastability in interacting nonlinear stochastic differential equations

    Nils Berglund, Bastien Fernandez, and Barbara Gentz. Metastability in interacting nonlinear stochastic differential equations. II . L arge- N behaviour. Nonlinearity , 20(11):2583--2614, 2007

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Propagation of chaos: a review of models, methods and applications

    Louis-Pierre Chaintron and Antoine Diez. Propagation of chaos: a review of models, methods and applications. I . M odels and methods. Kinet. Relat. Models , 15(6):895--1015, 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Propagation of chaos: a review of models, methods and applications

    Louis-Pierre Chaintron and Antoine Diez. Propagation of chaos: a review of models, methods and applications. II . A pplications. Kinet. Relat. Models , 15(6):1017--1173, 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Rigorous derivation of population cross-diffusion systems from moderately interacting particle systems

    Li Chen, Esther S Daus, Alexandra Holzinger, and Ansgar J \"u ngel. Rigorous derivation of population cross-diffusion systems from moderately interacting particle systems. Journal of Nonlinear Science , 31:1--38, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    u ngel. Rigorous mean-field limit and cross-diffusion. Zeitschrift f \

    Li Chen, Esther S Daus, and Ansgar J \"u ngel. Rigorous mean-field limit and cross-diffusion. Zeitschrift f \"u r angewandte Mathematik und Physik , 70:1--21, 2019

    work page 2019

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Propagation of chaos for multi-species moderately interacting particle systems up to newtonian singularity

    Jos \'e Antonio Carrillo, Shuchen Guo, and Alexandra Holzinger. Propagation of chaos for multi-species moderately interacting particle systems up to newtonian singularity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.03087 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Probabilistic approach for granular media equations in the non-uniformly convex case

    Patrick Cattiaux, Arnaud Guillin, and Florent Malrieu. Probabilistic approach for granular media equations in the non-uniformly convex case. Probability theory and related fields , 140:19--40, 2008

    2008

  3. [11]

    Long-time behaviour and phase transitions for the M c K ean-- V lasov equation on the torus

    Jose Antonio Carrillo, Rishabh S Gvalani, Grigorios A Pavliotis, and Andre Schlichting. Long-time behaviour and phase transitions for the M c K ean-- V lasov equation on the torus. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 235(1):635--690, 2020

    2020

  4. [12]

    Remarks on continuity equations with nonlinear diffusion and nonlocal drifts

    Guillaume Carlier and Maxime Laborde. Remarks on continuity equations with nonlinear diffusion and nonlocal drifts. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 444(2):1690--1702, 2016

    2016

  5. [13]

    Carrillo, Robert J

    Jos\'e A. Carrillo, Robert J. McCann, and C\'edric Villani. Kinetic equilibration rates for granular media and related equations: entropy dissipation and mass transportation estimates. Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana , 19(3):971--1018, 2003

    2003

  6. [14]

    A model for spatial conflict

    Peter Clifford and Aidan Sudbury. A model for spatial conflict. Biometrika , 60(3):581--588, 1973

    1973

  7. [15]

    Stationary solutions and large time asymptotics to a cross-diffusion-cahn–hilliard system

    Jean Cauvin-Vila, Virginie Ehrlacher, Greta Marino, and Jan-Frederik Pietschmann. Stationary solutions and large time asymptotics to a cross-diffusion-cahn–hilliard system. Nonlinear Analysis , 241:113482, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Donald A. Dawson. Critical dynamics and fluctuations for a mean-field model of cooperative behavior. J. Statist. Phys. , 31(1):29--85, 1983

    1983

  9. [17]

    On the diffusive-mean field limit for weakly interacting diffusions exhibiting phase transitions

    Matias G Delgadino, Rishabh S Gvalani, and Grigorios A Pavliotis. On the diffusive-mean field limit for weakly interacting diffusions exhibiting phase transitions. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis , 241:91--148, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    Stationary solutions of the V lasov- F okker- P lanck equation

    Klaus Dressler and H Neunzert. Stationary solutions of the V lasov- F okker- P lanck equation. Mathematical methods in the applied sciences , 9(1):169--176, 1987

    1987

  11. [19]

    Stationary solutions of the V lasov-- F okker-- P lanck equation: Existence, characterization and phase-transition

    Manh Hong Duong and Julian Tugaut. Stationary solutions of the V lasov-- F okker-- P lanck equation: Existence, characterization and phase-transition. Applied Mathematics Letters , 52:38--45, 2016

    2016

  12. [20]

    Coupled mckean--vlasov diffusions: wellposedness, propagation of chaos and invariant measures

    Manh Hong Duong and Julian Tugaut. Coupled mckean--vlasov diffusions: wellposedness, propagation of chaos and invariant measures. Stochastics , 92(6):900--943, 2020

    2020

  13. [21]

    Local and global existence for nonlocal multispecies advection-diffusion models

    Valeria Giunta, Thomas Hillen, Mark Lewis, and Jonathan R Potts. Local and global existence for nonlocal multispecies advection-diffusion models. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems , 21(3):1686--1708, 2022

    2022

  14. [22]

    Detecting minimum energy states and multi-stability in nonlocal advection--diffusion models for interacting species

    Valeria Giunta, Thomas Hillen, Mark A Lewis, and Jonathan R Potts. Detecting minimum energy states and multi-stability in nonlocal advection--diffusion models for interacting species. Journal of Mathematical Biology , 85(5):56, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    On the dynamics of large particle systems in the mean field limit

    Fran c ois Golse. On the dynamics of large particle systems in the mean field limit. In Macroscopic and large scale phenomena: coarse graining, mean field limits and ergodicity , pages 1--144. Springer, 2016

    2016

  16. [24]

    Consensus convergence with stochastic effects

    Josselin Garnier, George Papanicolaou, and Tzu-Wei Yang. Consensus convergence with stochastic effects. Vietnam Journal of Mathematics , 45(1):51--75, 2017

    2017

  17. [25]

    Multispecies cross-diffusions: from a nonlocal mean-field to a porous medium system without self-diffusion

    Sophie Hecht, Marie Doumic, Benoit Perthame, and Diane Peurichard. Multispecies cross-diffusions: from a nonlocal mean-field to a porous medium system without self-diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.01777 , 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Herrmann and J

    S. Herrmann and J. Tugaut. Non-uniqueness of stationary measures for self-stabilizing processes. Stochastic Process. Appl. , 120(7):1215--1246, 2010

    2010

  19. [27]

    Herrmann and J

    S. Herrmann and J. Tugaut. Stationary measures for self-stabilizing processes: asymptotic analysis in the small noise limit. Electron. J. Probab. , 15:no. 69, 2087--2116, 2010

    2010

  20. [28]

    Self-stabilizing processes: uniqueness problem for stationary measures and convergence rate in the small-noise limit

    Samuel Herrmann and Julian Tugaut. Self-stabilizing processes: uniqueness problem for stationary measures and convergence rate in the small-noise limit. ESAIM Probab. Stat. , 16:277--305, 2012

    2012

  21. [29]

    Multi-species patlak-keller-segel system, 2021

    Siming He and Eitan Tadmor. Multi-species patlak-keller-segel system, 2021

    2021

  22. [30]

    A review of the mean field limits for V lasov equations

    Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin. A review of the mean field limits for V lasov equations. Kinetic and Related models , 7(4):661--711, 2014

    2014

  23. [31]

    Nonlocal cross-diffusion systems for multi-species populations and networks

    Ansgar J \"u ngel, Stefan Portisch, and Antoine Zurek. Nonlocal cross-diffusion systems for multi-species populations and networks. Nonlinear Analysis , 219:112800, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Mean field limit for stochastic particle systems

    Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin and Zhenfu Wang. Mean field limit for stochastic particle systems. Active Particles, Volume 1: Advances in Theory, Models, and Applications , pages 379--402, 2017

    2017

  25. [33]

    On the critical mass patlak-keller-segel system for multi-species populations: global existence and infinite time aggregation, 2020

    Debabrata Karmakar and Gershon Wolansky. On the critical mass patlak-keller-segel system for multi-species populations: global existence and infinite time aggregation, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    The fully parabolic multi-species chemotaxis system in R ^ 2

    Ke Lin. The fully parabolic multi-species chemotaxis system in R ^ 2 . European Journal of Applied Mathematics , page 1–32, 2024

    2024

  27. [35]

    Sharp uniform-in-time propagation of chaos

    Daniel Lacker and Luc Le Flem. Sharp uniform-in-time propagation of chaos. Probability Theory and Related Fields , 187(1-2):443--480, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Global existence and blow-up in higher-dimensional patlak-keller-segel system for multi populations

    Ke Lin and Rong Zeng. Global existence and blow-up in higher-dimensional patlak-keller-segel system for multi populations. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 531(2, Part 1):127831, 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Propagation of chaos for a class of non-linear parabolic equations

    Henry P McKean. Propagation of chaos for a class of non-linear parabolic equations. Stochastic Differential Equations (Lecture Series in Differential Equations, Session 7, Catholic Univ., 1967) , pages 41--57, 1967

    1967

  30. [38]

    Local convergence rates for wasserstein gradient flows and mckean-vlasov equations with multiple stationary solutions, 2024

    Pierre Monmarché and Julien Reygner. Local convergence rates for wasserstein gradient flows and mckean-vlasov equations with multiple stationary solutions, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    The free energy in a multi-species sherrington-kirkpatrick model

    Dmitry Panchenko. The free energy in a multi-species sherrington-kirkpatrick model. The Annals of Probability , pages 3494--3513, 2015

    2015

  32. [40]

    Spatial memory and taxis-driven pattern formation in model ecosystems

    Jonathan R Potts and Mark A Lewis. Spatial memory and taxis-driven pattern formation in model ecosystems. Bulletin of mathematical biology , 81:2725--2747, 2019

    2019

  33. [41]

    Pr \'e v \^o t and M

    C. Pr \'e v \^o t and M. R \"o ckner. A concise course on stochastic partial differential equations , volume 1905 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, Berlin, 2007

    1905

  34. [42]

    Pavliotis and Andrea Zanoni

    Grigorios A. Pavliotis and Andrea Zanoni. A method of moments estimator for interacting particle systems and their mean field limit. SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif. , 12(2):262--288, 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Linearization of ergodic mckean sdes and applications

    Grigorios A Pavliotis and Andrea Zanoni. Linearization of ergodic mckean sdes and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.13655 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Systems of points with coulomb interactions

    Sylvia Serfaty. Systems of points with coulomb interactions. In 2018 International Congress of Mathematicians, ICM 2018 , pages 935--978. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte Ltd, 2018

    2018

  37. [45]

    M. Shiino. dynamic behavior of stochastic-systems of infinitely many coupled nonlinear oscillators exhibiting phase-transitions of mean-field type - h-theorem on asymptotic approach to equilibrium and critical slowing down of order-parameter fluctuations . Phys. Rev. A , 36 ( ...

    1987

  38. [46]

    Stroock and S

    Daniel W. Stroock and S. R. Srinivasa Varadhan. Multidimensional diffusion processes , volume 233 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften . Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1979

    1979

  39. [47]

    Topics in propagation of chaos

    Alain-Sol Sznitman. Topics in propagation of chaos. Ecole d’ \'e t \'e de probabilit \'e s de Saint-Flour XIX—1989 , 1464:165--251, 1991

    1989

  40. [48]

    Y. Tamura. On asymptotic behaviors of the solution of a nonlinear diffusion equation. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. , 31(1):195--221, 1984

    1984

  41. [49]

    Free energy and the convergence of distributions of diffusion processes of mckean type

    Yozo Tamura. Free energy and the convergence of distributions of diffusion processes of mckean type. Journal of the Faculty of Science, the University of Tokyo. Sect. 1 A, Mathematics , 34(2):443--484, 1987

    1987

  42. [50]

    Convergence to the equilibria for self-stabilizing processes in double-well landscape

    Julian Tugaut. Convergence to the equilibria for self-stabilizing processes in double-well landscape. Ann. Probab. , 41(3A):1427--1460, 2013

    2013

  43. [51]

    Self-stabilizing processes in multi-wells landscape in ^d -convergence

    Julian Tugaut. Self-stabilizing processes in multi-wells landscape in ^d -convergence. Stochastic Process. Appl. , 123(5):1780--1801, 2013

    2013

  44. [52]

    Phase transitions of M c K ean- V lasov processes in double-wells landscape

    Julian Tugaut. Phase transitions of M c K ean- V lasov processes in double-wells landscape. Stochastics , 86(2):257--284, 2014

    2014

  45. [53]

    Self-stabilizing processes in multi-wells landscape in R ^d -invariant probabilities

    Julian Tugaut. Self-stabilizing processes in multi-wells landscape in R ^d -invariant probabilities. J. Theoret. Probab. , 27(1):57--79, 2014

    2014

  46. [54]

    Multi-components chemotactic system in the absence of conflicts

    Gershon Wolansky. Multi-components chemotactic system in the absence of conflicts. European Journal of Applied Mathematics , 13(6):641--661, 2002

    2002

  47. [55]

    Zagli, G

    N. Zagli, G. A. Pavliotis, V. Lucarini, and A. Alecio. Dimension reduction of noisy interacting systems. Phys. Rev. Res. , 5:013078, Feb 2023

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.