Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Breast Ultrasound Tumor Generation via Mask Generator and Text-Guided Network:A Clinically Controllable Framework with Downstream Evaluation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that a dual-guidance diffusion model synthesizes realistic breast ultrasound tumors, and that using these synthetic images as augmentation improves downstream classification and segmentation.

desk verdict Solid mask-guided augmentation result with a genuine curvature-loss contribution; the text-control claim needs a direct prompt-swap test before it can hold. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.07721 v1 pith:DOVW4MNL submitted 2025-07-10 eess.IV cs.CV

Haoyu Pan , Hongxin Lin , Zetian Feng , Chuxuan Lin , Junyang Mo , Chu Zhang , Zijian Wu , Yi Wang
show 1 more author
Qingqing Zheng
This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords breastultrasounddiffusionmodelcontrollablegenerationtumormaskBI-RADSdataaugmentationclassificationsegmentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Breast ultrasound datasets are small because expert annotation is expensive, so the paper asks whether a generator can create clinically meaningful synthetic tumors to train diagnostic models. It proposes a two-channel control scheme: BI-RADS-style text prompts specify semantic features such as border clarity and internal echogenicity, while tumor masks supplied through a structural conditioning branch specify shape and location. To remove the need for manual masks at inference, it adds a mask generator that produces benign or malignant tumor shapes from a label, a bounding box, and noise, with a curvature loss enforcing smooth benign boundaries and irregular malignant ones. The paper reports that the full system achieves the lowest FID and KID on most of six datasets, that experienced sonographers can barely tell the outputs from real scans, and that mixing synthetic images into training improves classification AUC/F1 and segmentation DSC across architectures and datasets. If these findings hold, synthetic data could become a practical, controllable supplement for data-scarce breast ultrasound analysis without extra annotation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing component is the Semantic-Curvature Mask Generator (SCMG), a conditional generator that turns a tumor-type label, a bounding rectangle, and a random latent vector into a binary tumor mask. SCMG uses SPADE normalization blocks to inject the bounding-rectangle constraint and a differentiable mean-absolute-curvature loss to enforce class-specific boundary morphology. Around it, the framework is a dual-guidance latent diffusion pipeline: a frozen VAE maps ultrasound images to a compact latent space, a ControlNet branch feeds the mask as structural conditioning, and a text encoder feeds one of two BI-RADS templates ('benign tumor with well-defined borders and homogeneous internal echogenicity' versus 'malignant tumor with irregular borders and heterogeneous internal echogenicity') as semantic conditioning. The denoising UNet is trained with the standard noise-prediction objective, and at inference SCMG-generated masks replace manual annotations, which is what makes the whole pipeline annotation-free.

What would settle it

Generate the same tumor mask twice, once with the benign BI-RADS template and once with the malignant template, then measure the internal echogenicity heterogeneity and margin irregularity of the two output images; if the two groups are statistically indistinguishable once mask shape is controlled, the claim of text-driven clinical control is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that clinical controllability, not just visual fidelity, is what makes synthetic breast ultrasound images useful. The authors argue that by separating structural control (the tumor mask, injected through ControlNet) from semantic control (the BI-RADS template, injected through a text encoder), a latent diffusion model can synthesize tumors whose shape, position, boundary character, and echogenicity follow the clinician's prescription. They further claim the Semantic-Curvature Mask Generator (SCMG) replaces manual annotation: conditioned on tumor type, a bounding rectangle, and a latent vector, it outputs masks whose mean boundary curvature matches measured class statistics ($0.679\pm0.151$ for benign, $0.789\pm0.163$ for malignant, $p<0.01$). On the generation side, the full text-plus-mask model reaches the lowest FID/KID on BUSI, BrEaST, BUS-UCLM, and QAMEBI, and sonographers distinguish generated from real images with 46.3–57.3% accuracy. On the deployment side, adding synthetic images to real training sets improves classification (AUC/F1) and segmentation (DSC), with the best operating point usually at 25–100% synthetic-to-real ratio rather than at 200%.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the BI-RADS text prompt changes what the diffusion model draws, even though the paper never fixes the mask and swaps the prompt to show the output changes accordingly.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Synthetic images from the full framework can be mixed into real training sets at moderate ratios (25–100%) to raise classification AUC/F1 and segmentation DSC across multiple architectures and datasets.
  • Mask guidance contributes more than text guidance alone: the mask-only variant outperforms the text-only variant on generation quality, and the full text-plus-mask model is best on most datasets.
  • The curvature loss separates benign from malignant mask morphology; without it, generated benign and malignant masks have nearly equal curvature, and with it, benign mean curvature falls to 0.619 while malignant rises to 0.831.
  • Experienced sonographers classified generated versus real images with 46.3–57.3% accuracy across five datasets, near chance, indicating that the synthetic images are perceptually realistic.
  • Adding synthetic data at 200% often yields diminishing returns or slight degradation, so the benefit saturates and does not require unlimited generation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's ablations compare text-on versus text-off but never fix the mask and swap the benign/malignant prompt; a direct swap test would settle whether echogenicity and border character are truly driven by text rather than by the mask and dataset priors.
  • If the text channel is confirmed to drive echogenicity and margin character, the same architecture could synthesize attribute-balanced training sets or stress-test classifiers on rare lesion subtypes without collecting new cases.
  • The curvature statistics SCMG uses could double as a quantitative morphology score for real tumors, since they already separate benign from malignant boundaries with $p<0.01$.
  • The external STU segmentation gains hint that synthetic augmentation improves out-of-distribution robustness, but only one external dataset is tested; multi-centre validation would be the natural next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a two-stage framework for generating synthetic breast ultrasound (BUS) images. First, a semantic-curvature mask generator (SCMG) synthesizes tumor masks conditioned on tumor type (benign/malignant), a bounding rectangle, and a curvature-based clinical prior. Second, a ControlNet-based latent diffusion model generates BUS images conditioned on both the synthetic mask and a BI-RADS-derived text prompt (e.g., "benign tumor with well-defined borders and homogeneous internal echogenicity"). The authors evaluate generation quality with FID/KID on five public BUS datasets, compare realism through a visual Turing test with three sonographers, and measure downstream benefit by augmenting real training data with synthetic images for four classification and four segmentation backbones, including an external test set (STU). The paper claims that the framework provides fine-grained clinical control over morphology and echogenicity, that the synthetic masks are morphologically plausible, and that synthetic augmentation consistently improves downstream performance.

Significance. If the claims hold, the framework would be a practically useful data-augmentation tool for data-scarce BUS analysis: the downstream experiments cover six datasets, four classification backbones, four segmentation backbones, and an external test set, which is unusually broad. The SCMG with curvature regularization is a sensible and well-motivated component, and the visual Turing test with experienced sonographers is a credible realism check. The code is stated to be public, which supports reproducibility. However, the paper's central novelty—text-guided fine-grained control—is not actually demonstrated by the experiments, and several quantitative claims are stronger than the evidence (no variance or significance tests for FID/KID, and some downstream deltas are negligible or negative). The augmentation benefit and the mask generator are defensible, but the text-control claim needs direct verification before the contribution as framed can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.1.2 and §4.2.1] The claimed text-guided clinical control is not demonstrated. The ablation in Table 2 (Ours-t, Ours-m, Ours) varies only the presence or absence of text conditioning; it never fixes the mask and latent seed while swapping the benign/malignant prompt to show that echogenicity and border characteristics change accordingly. Since SCMG already injects class-specific boundary curvature via Lcur (§3.2.2) and each dataset has a strong class prior, the class-consistent appearance in Fig. 4 could arise entirely from mask guidance and dataset priors, leaving the text branch inert. Please add a prompt-swap experiment with identical mask and seed for both BI-RADS templates, and ideally quantify output attributes such as boundary irregularity or echogenicity statistics, to support the claims of "fine-grained control over morphology and echogenicity" and "text-guided network."
  2. [§4.2.1 and Table 2] FID and KID are reported as single point estimates without variance, confidence intervals, or significance tests. With small datasets such as UDIAT (163 images) and small absolute differences (e.g., Ours 7.072 vs. Ours-m 6.525 on UDIAT), the claim that "our method achieved overall the best performance" is not statistically supported. Please report FID/KID over multiple evaluation runs or bootstrap confidence intervals, and perform pairwise significance tests where appropriate.
  3. [§4.4.1 and Tables 5–6] The statement that "incorporating synthetic images notably boosted performance in both classification (AUC/F1-score) and segmentation (DSC%) tasks across all datasets and architectures" is stronger than the data show. Several cells exhibit negligible or negative changes relative to the 0% baseline, e.g., UDIAT UNet internal DSC at 25% synthetic ratio is 83.4 vs. 83.6 at baseline, and BUS-UCLM UNet at 25% and 50% is 78.5 vs. 78.8 at baseline. In addition, no significance tests accompany the AUC/DSC improvements, so the headline gains (e.g., BUSI DenseNet121 AUC 0.908 vs. 0.871) cannot be distinguished from noise. Please qualify the claim to align with the non-monotonic patterns already acknowledged in §4.4.3, and add statistical testing for the key augmentation comparisons.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] There is a typo in the abstract: "echogencity" should be "echogenicity."
  2. [§3.1.3] The notation is confusing: Cθ is used for the CLIP text encoder, but the sentence "Cθ(τ0) and m0 are processed by ControlNet ξθ" suggests Cθ is also the input to ControlNet. Please clarify the symbols, e.g., denote the text embedding as eτ and the ControlNet output as ξθ(zt, m0, eτ).
  3. [§3.2.3, Eq. (14)] The symbol Dcla in Eq. (14) appears to be a typo for Dcls, matching the description "Dcls denotes the tumor type prediction."
  4. [§4.2.3] The visual Turing test reports mean accuracies without confidence intervals or a statistical comparison against chance (50%). Given the reported standard deviations across three sonographers, some results (e.g., BUSI 46.3%) are within sampling error of chance. Reporting binomial confidence intervals would strengthen the realism claim.
  5. [Abstract] The abstract states "The code is publicly available" but no repository URL or access details are provided anywhere in the manuscript. Please add a link or footnote.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No central circularity; the only notable loop is the SCMG curvature-loss ablation, which audits the loss against its own target but does not drive the independent downstream or Turing-test findings.

  1. other [Section 4.3 (Table 4), with Eq. (11) and Section 3.2.2]
    "The results reveal that, without Lcur, the generator failed to differentiate between benign and malignant morphologies, yielding nearly identical curvature distributions. In contrast, incorporating curvature loss largely reduced curvature in benign masks (from 0.723 to 0.619), indicating smoother boundaries, while increasing it in malignant masks (from 0.721 to 0.831), encouraging sharper and more irregular contours."

    Equation (11) defines Lcur = |κbar_gen − κbar_target|, where κbar_target is set in Section 3.2.2 from the same real-mask statistics that Table 4 uses as the reference. Table 4 therefore shows the regularizer moving its own training target: the statement in Section 4.3 that 'These results confirm that Lcur served as a structural prior' is a check that the implemented objective was optimized, not an independent confirmation of clinical mask plausibility. The loop is confined to this ablation; the FID/KID comparisons, downstream classification and segmentation, and the sonographer Turing test are evaluated against held-out real data and do not reduce to this target.

full rationale

The core derivative claims are self-contained against external evidence: generation quality is measured by FID/KID against real test statistics, downstream augmented-training gains are evaluated on held-out real images and the external STU dataset, and the visual Turing test uses independent sonographer judgment on mixed real and synthetic images. The only self-referential component is the SCMG curvature ablation, which validates Lcur against the very κbar_target values that Lcur is designed to enforce; this is a design-validation loop rather than a fitted prediction bearing the central contribution. The text-control claim is under-supported because no fixed-mask prompt-swap experiment is reported, but that is an evidence gap, not a circular reduction. No load-bearing self-citations or imported uniqueness theorems are present. Overall circularity is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework relies on standard deep learning components plus a few data-derived constants. No new physical or clinical entity is introduced. The main external dependency is the transferability of natural-image pretrained components to ultrasound.

free parameters (3)
  • Class-specific curvature targets (benign, malignant) = 0.679, 0.789
    Derived from real tumor masks (Section 3.2.2) and used as loss targets in Lcur; they are data-fitted constants, not first-principles values.
  • Curvature computation epsilon = 1e-8
    Numerical stabilizer in Eq. (10), arbitrary but inconsequential.
  • Synthetic-to-real mixing ratios = 25%, 50%, 100%, 200%
    Downstream augmentation hyperparameters; optimal ratio varies by dataset and model and is chosen post hoc, but this does not affect the generator's parameters.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Stable diffusion VAE and CLIP text encoder pretrained on natural images transfer to breast ultrasound and clinical text.
    Invoked in Section 3.1.1 and 3.1.3; no domain-specific fine-tuning of the text encoder is described.
  • domain assumption Two fixed BI-RADS text templates capture the clinically relevant variation in tumor echogenicity and border clarity.
    Section 3.1.2; the templates only encode benign vs malignant, not finer gradations.
  • domain assumption The curvature statistics (benign 0.679, malignant 0.789) are representative across the six datasets.
    Section 3.2.2 uses a global target for all datasets; dataset-specific statistics might differ.
  • domain assumption The 80/20 split prevents generator leakage from the test set.
    Section 4.1.1 states VAE fine-tuning is on training sets, but the diffusion/ControlNet training set composition is not explicitly stated.
  • domain assumption FID/KID with ImageNet-Inception features are meaningful proxies for clinical realism.
    Section 4.1.3; these metrics are not validated against clinical reading in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Breast Ultrasound Tumor Generation via Mask Generator and Text-Guided Network:A Clinically Controllable Framework with Downstream Evaluation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DOVW4MNL

@misc{pith2026250707721,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Breast Ultrasound Tumor Generation via Mask Generator and Text-Guided Network:A Clinically Controllable Framework with Downstream Evaluation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DOVW4MNL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.07721}
}
read the original abstract

The development of robust deep learning models for breast ultrasound (BUS) image analysis is significantly constrained by the scarcity of expert-annotated data. To address this limitation, we propose a clinically controllable generative framework for synthesizing BUS images. This framework integrates clinical descriptions with structural masks to generate tumors, enabling fine-grained control over tumor characteristics such as morphology, echogencity, and shape. Furthermore, we design a semantic-curvature mask generator, which synthesizes structurally diverse tumor masks guided by clinical priors. During inference, synthetic tumor masks serve as input to the generative framework, producing highly personalized synthetic BUS images with tumors that reflect real-world morphological diversity. Quantitative evaluations on six public BUS datasets demonstrate the significant clinical utility of our synthetic images, showing their effectiveness in enhancing downstream breast cancer diagnosis tasks. Furthermore, visual Turing tests conducted by experienced sonographers confirm the realism of the generated images, indicating the framework's potential to support broader clinical applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.07721 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the proposed clinically controllable framework. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The training pipeline for generating breast ultrasound images with tumors follows a three-stage process: (a) the variational autoencoder (VAE) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. SCMG architecture overview. SCMG is a conditional generator that takes as input a latent vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Visual comparison of breast ultrasound images generated by di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Visual comparison of generated tumor masks for (a) benign and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Downstream segmentation and classification performance under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , author Gomaa, M

    author Al-Dhabyani, W. , author Gomaa, M. , author Khaled, H. , author Fahmy, A. , year 2020 . title Dataset of breast ultrasound images . journal Data in brief volume 28 , pages 104863

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    , author Alturki, N

    author Aljuaid, H. , author Alturki, N. , author Alsubaie, N. , author Cavallaro, L. , author Liotta, A. , year 2022 . title Computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer classification using deep neural networks and transfer learning . journal Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine volume 223 , pages 106951

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    , author Mohammadi, A

    author Ardakani, A.A. , author Mohammadi, A. , author Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari, M. , author Acharya, U.R. , year 2023 . title An open-access breast lesion ultrasound image database: Applicable in artificial intelligence studies . journal Computers in Biology and Medicine volume 152 , pages 106438

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    , author Misra, S

    author Cho, Y. , author Misra, S. , author Managuli, R. , author Barr, R.G. , author Lee, J. , author Kim, C. , year 2025 . title Attention-based fusion network for breast cancer segmentation and classification using multi-modal ultrasound images . journal Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology volume 51 , pages 568--577

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    , author Yurt, M

    author Dar, S.U. , author Yurt, M. , author Karacan, L. , author Erdem, A. , author Erdem, E. , author Cukur, T. , year 2019 . title Image synthesis in multi-contrast MRI with conditional generative adversarial networks . journal IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging volume 38 , pages 2375--2388

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    , author Nichol, A

    author Dhariwal, P. , author Nichol, A. , year 2021 . title Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis . journal Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems volume 34 , pages 8780--8794

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    , author Waldner, F

    author Diakogiannis, F.I. , author Waldner, F. , author Caccetta, P. , author Wu, C. , year 2020 . title Resunet-a: A deep learning framework for semantic segmentation of remotely sensed data . journal ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing volume 162 , pages 94--114

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    , author Jiang, Y

    author Du, Y. , author Jiang, Y. , author Tan, S. , author Wu, X. , author Dou, Q. , author Li, Z. , author Li, G. , author Wan, X. , year 2023 . title Arsdm: Colonoscopy images synthesis with adaptive refinement semantic diffusion models , in: booktitle International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention , organization ...

    work page 2023

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    , author Pinaya, W.H.L

    author Fernandez, V. , author Pinaya, W.H.L. , author Borges, P. , author Tudosiu, P.D. , author Graham, M.S. , author Vercauteren, T. , author Cardoso, M.J. , year 2022 . title Can segmentation models be trained with fully synthetically generated data? , in: booktitle Interna...

    2022

  2. [10]

    , author El-Khoury, A

    author Freiche, B. , author El-Khoury, A. , author Nasiri-Sarvi, A. , author Hosseini, M.S. , author Garcia, D. , author Basarab, A. , author Boily, M. , author Rivaz, H. , year 2025 . title Ultrasound image generation using latent diffusion models . journal arXiv preprint arX...

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    , year 2023

    author Goceri, E. , year 2023 . title Medical image data augmentation: techniques, comparisons and interpretations . journal Artificial Intelligence Review volume 56 , pages 12561--12605

    2023

  4. [12]

    , author Pouget-Abadie, J

    author Goodfellow, I.J. , author Pouget-Abadie, J. , author Mirza, M. , author Xu, B. , author Warde-Farley, D. , author Ozair, S. , author Courville, A. , author Bengio, Y. , year 2014 . title Generative adversarial nets . journal Advances in Neural Information Processing Sys...

    2014

  5. [13]

    , author Lu, G

    author Guo, R. , author Lu, G. , author Qin, B. , author Fei, B. , year 2018 . title Ultrasound imaging technologies for breast cancer detection and management: a review . journal Ultrasound in medicine & biology volume 44 , pages 37--70

    2018

  6. [14]

    , author Wen, H

    author Guo, X. , author Wen, H. , author Hao, H. , author Zhao, Y. , author Meng, Y. , author Liu, J. , author Zheng, Y. , author Chen, W. , author Zhao, Y. , year 2025 . title Randomness-restricted diffusion model for ocular surface structure segmentation . journal IEEE Trans...

    2025

  7. [15]

    , author Lyu, Y

    author Han, L. , author Lyu, Y. , author Peng, C. , author Zhou, S.K. , year 2022 . title Gan-based disentanglement learning for chest x-ray rib suppression . journal Medical Image Analysis volume 77 , pages 102369

    2022

  8. [16]

    , author Zhang, X

    author He, K. , author Zhang, X. , author Ren, S. , author Sun, J. , year 2016 . title Deep residual learning for image recognition , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. pages 770--778

    2016

  9. [17]

    , author Jain, A

    author Ho, J. , author Jain, A. , author Abbeel, P. , year 2020 . title Denoising diffusion probabilistic models . journal Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems volume 33 , pages 6840--6851

    2020

  10. [18]

    , author Liu, Z

    author Huang, G. , author Liu, Z. , author Van Der Maaten, L. , author Weinberger, K.Q. , year 2017 . title Densely connected convolutional networks , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. pages 4700--4708

    2017

  11. [19]

    , author Chen, H

    author Jiang, Y. , author Chen, H. , author Loew, M. , author Ko, H. , year 2020 . title COVID-19 CT image synthesis with a conditional generative adversarial network . journal IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics volume 25 , pages 441--452

    2020

  12. [20]

    , author Aghdam, E.K

    author Kazerouni, A. , author Aghdam, E.K. , author Heidari, M. , author Azad, R. , author Fayyaz, M. , author Hacihaliloglu, I. , author Merhof, D. , year 2023 . title Diffusion models in medical imaging: A comprehensive survey . journal Medical Image Analysis volume 88 , pag...

    2023

  13. [21]

    , author Harper, A

    author Kim, J. , author Harper, A. , author McCormack, V. , author Sung, H. , author Houssami, N. , author Morgan, E. , author Mutebi, M. , author Garvey, G. , author Soerjomataram, I. , author Fidler-Benaoudia, M.M. , year 2025 . title Global patterns and trends in breast can...

    2025

  14. [22]

    , author Na, Y

    author Kim, K. , author Na, Y. , author Ye, S.J. , author Lee, J. , author Ahn, S.S. , author Park, J.E. , author Kim, H. , year 2024 . title Controllable text-to-image synthesis for multi-modality MR images , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Appl...

    2024

  15. [23]

    , author Bhunia, A.K

    author Koley, S. , author Bhunia, A.K. , author Sekhri, D. , author Sain, A. , author Chowdhury, P.N. , author Xiang, T. , author Song, Y.Z. , year 2024 . title It's all about your sketch: Democratising sketch control in diffusion models , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE...

    2024

  16. [24]

    , author Chen, Y

    author Konz, N. , author Chen, Y. , author Dong, H. , author Mazurowski, M.A. , year 2024 . title Anatomically-controllable medical image generation with segmentation-guided diffusion models , in: booktitle International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assis...

    2024

  17. [25]

    , author Yang, X

    author Liang, J. , author Yang, X. , author Huang, Y. , author Li, H. , author He, S. , author Hu, X. , author Chen, Z. , author Xue, W. , author Cheng, J. , author Ni, D. , year 2022 . title Sketch guided and progressive growing GAN for realistic and editable ultrasound image...

    2022

  18. [26]

    , author Yang, Q

    author Luo, Y. , author Yang, Q. , author Fan, Y. , author Qi, H. , author Xia, M. , year 2024 . title Measurement guidance in diffusion models: Insight from medical image synthesis . journal IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence volume 46 , pages 7983--7997

    2024

  19. [27]

    , author Schlemper, J

    author Oktay, O. , author Schlemper, J. , author Folgoc, L.L. , author Lee, M. , author Heinrich, M. , author Misawa, K. , author Mori, K. , author McDonagh, S. , author Hammerla, N.Y. , author Kainz, B. , et al., year 2018 . title Attention u-net: Learning where to look for t...

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    , author Liu, M.Y

    author Park, T. , author Liu, M.Y. , author Wang, T.C. , author Zhu, J.Y. , year 2019 . title Semantic image synthesis with spatially-adaptive normalization , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. pages 2337--2346

    2019

  21. [29]

    , author \'C wierz-Pie \'n kowska, A

    author Paw owska, A. , author \'C wierz-Pie \'n kowska, A. , author Domalik, A. , author Jagu \'s , D. , author Kasprzak, P. , author Matkowski, R. , author Fura, . , author Nowicki, A. , author \.Z o ek, N. , year 2024 . title Curated benchmark dataset for ultrasound based br...

    2024

  22. [30]

    , author Pei, J

    author Qian, X. , author Pei, J. , author Zheng, H. , author Xie, X. , author Yan, L. , author Zhang, H. , author Han, C. , author Gao, X. , author Zhang, H. , author Zheng, W. , et al., year 2021 . title Prospective assessment of breast cancer risk from multimodal multiview u...

    2021

  23. [31]

    , et al., year 2021

    author Radford, A. , et al., year 2021 . title Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision , in: booktitle International Conference on Machine Learning , pp. pages 8748--8763

    2021

  24. [32]

    , author Blattmann, A

    author Rombach, R. , author Blattmann, A. , author Lorenz, D. , author Esser, P. , author Ommer, B. , year 2022 . title High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognitio...

    2022

  25. [33]

    , author Fischer, P

    author Ronneberger, O. , author Fischer, P. , author Brox, T. , year 2015 . title U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation , in: booktitle Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention--MICCAI 2015: 18th international conference, Munich, Ger...

    2015

  26. [34]

    , author Howard, A

    author Sandler, M. , author Howard, A. , author Zhu, M. , author Zhmoginov, A. , author Chen, L.C. , year 2018 . title Mobilenetv2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. pag...

    2018

  27. [35]

    , author Kumar, A

    author Sharma, V. , author Kumar, A. , author Jha, D. , author Bhuyan, M.K. , author Das, P.K. , author Bagci, U. , year 2024 . title Controlpolypnet: towards controlled colon polyp synthesis for improved polyp segmentation , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conferenc...

    2024

  28. [36]

    , author Weiss, E

    author Sohl-Dickstein, J. , author Weiss, E. , author Maheswaranathan, N. , author Ganguli, S. , year 2015 . title Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics , in: booktitle International Conference on Machine Learning , pp. pages 2256--2265

    2015

  29. [37]

    , author Meng, C

    author Song, J. , author Meng, C. , author Ermon, S. , year 2020 . title Denoising diffusion implicit models . journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502

    2020 arXiv

  30. [38]

    , author Le, Q

    author Tan, M. , author Le, Q. , year 2019 . title Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks , in: booktitle International conference on machine learning , organization PMLR . pp. pages 6105--6114

    2019

  31. [39]

    , author Tran, T

    author Thanh-Tung, H. , author Tran, T. , year 2020 . title Catastrophic forgetting and mode collapse in gans , in: booktitle 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) , organization IEEE . pp. pages 1--10

    2020

  32. [40]

    , author Bueno, G

    author Vallez, N. , author Bueno, G. , author Deniz, O. , author Rienda, M.A. , author Pastor, C. , year 2025 . title Bus-uclm: Breast ultrasound lesion segmentation dataset . journal Scientific Data volume 12 , pages 242

    2025

  33. [41]

    , author Wang, K

    author Wang, J. , author Wang, K. , author Yu, Y. , author Lu, Y. , author Xiao, W. , author Sun, Z. , author Liu, F. , author Zou, Z. , author Gao, Y. , author Yang, L. , et al., year 2025 . title Self-improving generative foundation model for synthetic medical image generati...

    2025

  34. [42]

    , author Liu, M.Y

    author Wang, T.C. , author Liu, M.Y. , author Zhu, J.Y. , author Tao, A. , author Kautz, J. , author Catanzaro, B. , year 2018 . title High-resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional gans , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer...

    2018

  35. [43]

    , author Wang, N

    author Wang, Y. , author Wang, N. , author Xu, M. , author Yu, J. , author Qin, C. , author Luo, X. , author Yang, X. , author Wang, T. , author Li, A. , author Ni, D. , year 2020 . title Deeply-supervised networks with threshold loss for cancer detection in automated breast u...

    2020

  36. [44]

    , author Pons, G

    author Yap, M.H. , author Pons, G. , author Marti, J. , author Ganau, S. , author Sentis, M. , author Zwiggelaar, R. , author Davison, A.K. , author Marti, R. , year 2017 . title Automated breast ultrasound lesions detection using convolutional neural networks . journal IEEE j...

    2017

  37. [45]

    , author Rao, A

    author Zhang, L. , author Rao, A. , author Agrawala, M. , year 2023 . title Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models , in: booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pp. pages 3836--3847

    2023

  38. [46]

    , author Yao, L

    author Zhang, Z. , author Yao, L. , author Wang, B. , author Jha, D. , author Durak, G. , author Keles, E. , author Medetalibeyoglu, A. , author Bagci, U. , year 2024 . title Diffboost: Enhancing medical image segmentation via text-guided diffusion model . journal IEEE Transac...

    2024

  39. [47]

    , author Rahman Siddiquee, M.M

    author Zhou, Z. , author Rahman Siddiquee, M.M. , author Tajbakhsh, N. , author Liang, J. , year 2018 . title Unet++: A nested u-net architecture for medical image segmentation , in: booktitle Deep learning in medical image analysis and multimodal learning for clinical decisio...

    2018

  40. [48]

    , author Li, N

    author Zhuang, Z. , author Li, N. , author Joseph Raj, A.N. , author Mahesh, V.G. , author Qiu, S. , year 2019 . title An rdau-net model for lesion segmentation in breast ultrasound images . journal PloS one volume 14 , pages e0221535

    2019

  41. [49]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.