Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 48 references

Static and dynamic ordering of magnetic repelling particles under confinement: disks vs bars

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Confined magnetic particles that repel without touching reproduce granular behavior driven by magnetic wall friction, with compression strength set by particle count and mass rather than shape.

desk verdict Genuinely new observation of orientational vs positional ordering in repelling magnetic bars, but the continuum-medium conclusion outruns the quantitative evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.08816 v1 pith:X6TGAZRJ submitted 2025-06-27 cond-mat.soft physics.app-phphysics.class-phphysics.flu-dyn

M. Aguilar-González , L. F. Elizondo-Aguilera , Y.D. Sobral , F. Pacheco-Vázquez This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.app-phphysics.class-phphysics.flu-dyn
keywords repellinggrainsconfinedgranularmatterJansseneffectdampersmagneticparticlesangleofreposeorientationalorderingcompressiondynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports experiments on a two-dimensional monolayer of magnetic particles that repel one another without contact, comparing round disks and rectangular bars. It tries to establish that this system is an effective granular material: both geometries form piles with an angle of repose and show Janssen-like saturation of the pressure at the bottom of a column, effects traced to friction between particles and the confining walls generated by magnetic torques. Under compression, both shapes respond with a continuous, nearly exponential rise in opposing force, with no stick-slip or oscillations, while the internal ordering differs: disks develop hexagonal positional order near the piston, and bars develop nematic-like orientational order. The paper concludes that particle shape is a minor factor and that the system can be treated as a continuum medium, with total number of particles and total mass as the controlling parameters; for a magnetic granular damper, this points to maximizing particle count rather than tuning shape.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the magnetically induced wall friction: because the dipole moments are locked perpendicular to the glass plates, each particle experiences a torque that presses it against the front and rear walls, converting magnetic repulsion into Coulomb friction at the particle-wall contact. This single mechanism produces the angle of repose and the Janssen-like saturation, and it is why the authors can fit their pressure profiles with the two-parameter exponential $F/w = \mu_g \rho_i g \lambda_i (1-e^{-z/\lambda_i})$ from the friction-driven 2D Janssen problem. For the compression experiments, the central observables are the bond-orientational parameters $\psi'_6$ and $\psi'_4$ for positional order and orientation maps for the bars, which together show that disks gain hexagonal order while bars gain orientational order even though the macroscopic force response is the same.

What would settle it

Measure the sideways pressure on the cell walls while adding magnets to a vertical column; if the ratio of sideways pressure to bottom pressure drifts with height rather than staying fixed, the stress-proportionality assumption and the single-exponential Janssen fit break down.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is that a confined collection of magnetic repelling particles behaves like ordinary granular matter even though the grains never touch. The friction that supports piles and columns is magnetic in origin: each particle's dipole moment is normal to the cell walls, so the net torque $\vec{\tau} = -\vec{\mu}_m \times \vec{B}$ presses the particle against the glass and mobilizes Coulomb friction at that contact. With this mechanism, magnetic disks give an angle of repose $\theta^d_R = 34^\circ$ and bars $\theta^b_R = 26^\circ$, and both geometries show bottom-pressure saturation well described by the Janssen-like expression $F/w = \mu_g \rho_i g \lambda_i (1-e^{-z/\lambda_i})$. Under horizontal compression, samples of 500 disks and 185 bars chosen to give comparable strength produce the same continuous, nearly exponential force growth and similar relaxation, while the internal ordering differs: $\psi'_6$ grows near the piston for disks, whereas bars show orientational alignment along the piston stroke with no positional order. The paper concludes that, despite these different microstructures, a magnetic granular system can be approached simply as a continuum medium regardless of particle shape, with total particle number and neodymium mass as the controlling parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The whole continuum picture rests on the assumption that the sideways pressure inside a pile stays proportional to the downward pressure, exactly as in ordinary silos; this proportionality is never measured, and the fit that supports it requires a mass density about three times the directly measured value.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A magnetic granular damper should be optimized by maximizing the number of repelling particles rather than by choosing a particle shape, because a given target force can be reached with about half the neodymium mass when it is split into more, smaller disks.
  • Shape can be used to select the internal ordering mode, hexagonal packing for disks and nematic alignment for bars, without changing the smoothness or magnitude of the compression response.
  • The continuous, stick-slip-free compression and the comparable relaxation curves mean less particle wear and more predictable damping than in conventional contact-granular dampers.
  • A Janssen-type continuum description with a single saturation length $\lambda_i$ applies to both geometries, provided the fitted density is interpreted through the effective magnetic exclusion area rather than the physical particle density.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the continuum claim holds generally, the saturation length $\lambda_i$ should scale with the range of the magnetic repulsion; measuring columns with different magnet strengths or cell gaps would turn that free parameter into a predictive quantity.
  • Editorial inference: the threefold gap between fitted and measured mass density could be tested directly by imaging the pair distribution of repellers and computing an effective excluded-area density, which would either confirm the magnetic-core interpretation or expose the Janssen fit as absorbing an unmodeled stress ratio.
  • Editorial inference: because bars align along the compression direction, a damper made of anisotropic repellers may show direction-dependent dissipation; probing oblique or biaxial compression could reveal whether the geometry independence persists or breaks down.
  • Editorial inference: the collapse of disk and bar force curves at the fastest compression rate suggests a rate-independent envelope that cyclic loading might preserve; measuring energy dissipation per cycle would test whether the continuum equivalence survives repeated loading.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experiments on quasi-2D magnetic repelling particles confined in a Hele-Shaw cell, comparing disks and rectangular bars. In the static case, the authors measure the angle of repose and the bottom force of granular columns as a function of column height, and fit the latter with a Janssen-like exponential expression. In the dynamic case, they compress horizontal monolayers at different rates and compaction ratios, recording the force response and analyzing particle motion, hexagonal bond-orientational order, and bar orientations. The central claims are that both particle shapes show prototypical granular features (angle of repose and Janssen-like pressure saturation), that the compression response is smooth and continuous for both shapes, that disks order hexagonally while bars order orientationally, and that the system can be treated as a shape-independent effective continuum medium.

Significance. An experimentally supported shape-independent continuum description of confined magnetic repelling particles would be a valuable simplification for designing magnetic granular dampers and would strengthen the analogy between non-contact magnetic systems and conventional granular materials. The paper has clear strengths: the angle-of-repose data show good reproducibility across realizations, the compression experiments for bars are new, and the PIV plus orientational analysis provides a concrete microscopic contrast (hexagonal ordering for disks vs nematic-like ordering for bars). The qualitative observations are internally consistent and the authors are explicit about their assumptions. However, the load-bearing quantitative claim—that the Janssen-like saturation validates a continuum description—is not established: the fit in Eq. (1) uses two free parameters per geometry, and the fitted densities are about three times the independently measured densities, while the stress-proportionality assumption is stated as a conjecture. Thus the continuum conclusion is currently stronger than the evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (1)] The Janssen-like fit does not provide independent evidence for the stress-proportionality conjecture on which the continuum interpretation rests. The fit uses ρ_i and λ_i as free parameters, and the fitted densities (3.4 kg/m² for disks, 6.5 kg/m² for bars) are approximately three times the measured values (1.13 kg/m² and 2.32 kg/m²). A two-parameter saturating exponential will match the curves even if the actual stress-redirection mechanism is not the Janssen one. The authors attribute the density discrepancy to an effective excluded area, but that makes ρ_i an effective fitting parameter and leaves λ_i without an independent meaning. To support the claim that σ_xx and σ_yy are proportional to σ_zz, the horizontal wall force (or an equivalent measure of the stress ratio) should be measured, or the conclusion should be weakened to reporting a Janssen-like saturation without invoking a validated continuum model.
  2. [Section 4, Fig. 6b] The conclusion that particle geometry plays a minor role in the compressive strength is based on a comparison in which the number of bars, Nb=185, is chosen empirically to match the force profile of Nd=500 disks. This choice is not an independent test of shape-independence: it builds the equality of the force responses into the selection of the system. Moreover, the comparison mixes particle number and mass, since 185 bars contain roughly 407 g of neodymium while 500 disks contain about 200 g. The equal-mass comparison with 90 bars gives a much weaker force, which the authors explain by particle number, but no systematic scaling of force with N at fixed mass (or with shape at fixed N) is provided. Without such a scaling test, the claim that total mass and particle number are the key control parameters is not quantitatively established.
  3. [Section 4, Figs. 6a and 7] The paper repeatedly characterizes the compression response as exponential and as 'essentially the same' for disks and bars, but no quantitative comparison is reported. The semilog insets suggest exponential growth, yet no fitted exponent, amplitude, or goodness-of-fit is given for the force curves. Since the later claim that the two geometries 'eventually collapse into a single curve' at high speed is central to the shape-independence message, the authors should provide a quantitative criterion, such as a fitted rate constant and amplitude for each geometry and speed, or a normalized root-mean-square difference between the force profiles, to support the collapse claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2 and Section 4] There are several typographical errors, including 'Helle-Shaw' instead of 'Hele-Shaw' near the end of Section 4, 'compactation rations' instead of 'compaction ratios' in Section 4.1, and 'the the compression length' in the Concluding Remarks. The reference list also contains 'Vereins Eutscher Ingenieure Zeitschrift' in Ref. [33], which should likely read 'Deutscher'.
  2. [Eq. (2)] The symbol NB is used both for the number of nearest neighbors in the bond-orientational parameter ψ′_6 and for the number of bars in the experiments. This notation collision is confusing and should be resolved, for example by using k for the neighbor count.
  3. [Section 3.2] The phrase 'Janssen effect [32, 33]).' contains an extra closing parenthesis before the period. Also, the related 'Magnetic Janssen effect' of Ref. [20] is cited but not discussed; a sentence comparing that externally driven 3D system with the intrinsic-dipole 2D system studied here would help place the present result in context.
  4. [Section 4.1] The term 'non-contact force chains' is used for repulsive magnetic interactions, but in conventional granular physics force chains are defined by contact-force networks. Since the present system has no inter-particle contacts, the authors should define what is meant by a force chain in this context (e.g., regions of elevated repulsive stress or correlated particle velocities) to avoid implying the standard contact-based mechanism.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is explicit about fitting parameters and empirical choices, and its central claims rest on measurements rather than on a derivation that reduces to its own inputs.

full rationale

The Janssen-like analysis in Section 3.2 is presented as a fit, not as a prediction: Eq. (1) is introduced as a 'fitting function' with rho_i and lambda_i as free parameters, and the paper explicitly compares the fitted densities with independently measured values, noting that they differ by about a factor of three and attributing the difference to effective excluded area. The stress-proportionality assumption is explicitly called a 'conjecture' rather than a derived result, so the later wording 'thus confirming the balance' is an overstatement of what a two-parameter exponential fit can establish, but it is not an equation reducing to its own input or a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The compression comparison in Section 4 is also transparent: Nb = 185 is chosen empirically so that the bar force profile matches the disk profile at one protocol, and the paper does not present that matching as an independent test. Self-citations to prior work by the same authors are used as background for the magnetic-torque friction mechanism and for previous compression experiments, but they are not invoked as an external uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the central claim. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained in the sense that the main experimental observations and fits are reported as measurements, with assumptions stated as assumptions, so there is no circularity by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central quantitative claims rest on a two-parameter Janssen fit (rho and lambda) whose fitted density is about three times the measured density, and on the post-hoc choice of N_b=185 to match disk force profiles. The torque-induced wall friction mechanism is a stated domain assumption inherited from Ref. [23]. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • rho_d (fitted column mass density for disks) = 3.4 kg/m^2
    Fit parameter in Eq. (1) for the disk column; the independently measured value is 1.13 kg/m^2, about a third of the fitted value.
  • rho_b (fitted column mass density for bars) = 6.5 kg/m^2
    Fit parameter in Eq. (1) for the bar column; independently measured value is 2.32 kg/m^2.
  • lambda_d (Janssen saturation length, disks) = 0.125 m
    Fit parameter setting the exponential approach to saturation in Eq. (1).
  • lambda_b (Janssen saturation length, bars) = 0.265 m
    Fit parameter setting the exponential approach to saturation in Eq. (1).
  • N_b (number of bars chosen for comparison) = 185
    Chosen empirically so that the bar force profile matches the disk force profile at v=0.1 cm/s and epsilon=0.6; this choice underpins the claim that geometry is a minor factor.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Horizontal components of the stress tensor are proportional to the vertical stress in the magnetic granular medium.
    Conjectured in Section 3.2 to justify the Janssen-like Eq. (1); not directly measured.
  • domain assumption The only frictional contributions are particle-wall contacts generated by magnetic torques, with lateral wall friction ruled out by fixed edge magnets.
    Invoked in Section 2 and Fig. 2 to explain both the angle of repose and Janssen saturation; inherited from Ref. [23].
  • domain assumption Dipolar moments of the particles remain oriented perpendicular to the confining plates during all experiments.
    Section 2 states the confinement prevents dipole flipping, which is required for repulsive interactions.
  • domain assumption Material properties of the neodymium particles (mass, dimensions, field strength) are as reported by the supplier.
    Particle masses and magnetic field strengths are taken from supplier data [27, 28], not independently verified in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Static and dynamic ordering of magnetic repelling particles under confinement: disks vs bars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X6TGAZRJ

@misc{pith2026250708816,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Static and dynamic ordering of magnetic repelling particles under confinement: disks vs bars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X6TGAZRJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.08816}
}
read the original abstract

We explored experimentally the self-organization at rest and the compression dynamics of a two-dimensional array of magnetic repelling particles, using two particle geometries, namely, disks and rectangular bars. Despite the non-contact interaction, typical static features of granular materials are observed for both particle shapes: pile formation with an angle of repose and pressure saturation (Janssen-like effect), which can be explained by considering the magnetically-induced torques that generate friction between particles and confining walls. Particle shape effects are mainly observed during compression: while disks rearrange increasing the hexagonal ordering, bars augment their orientational ordering forming larger non-contact force chains; however, in both cases, the resistance to compression rises continuously, in contrast with the fluctuating compression dynamics (stick-slip motion or periodic oscillations) that characterizes granular systems with inter-particle contacts. The continuous response to compression, and the reduction of particle wear due to non-contact interactions, are desirable features in designing magnetic granular dampers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Granular Matter 25(3), 49 (2023)

    Varela-Rosales, N.R., Santarossa, A., Engel, M., P¨ oschel, T.: Granular binary mixtures improve energy dissipation efficiency of gran- ular dampers. Granular Matter 25(3), 49 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Applied Acoustics 200, 109059 (2022)

    Prasad, B.B., Duvigneau, F., Juhre, D., Woschke, E.: Damping performance of parti- cle dampers with different granular materials and their mixtures. Applied Acoustics 200, 109059 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 188, 110038 (2023)

    Terzioglu, F., Rongong, J.A., Lord, C.E.: Motional phase maps for estimating the effec- tiveness of granular dampers. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 188, 110038 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Pourtavakoli, H., Parteli, E.J., P¨ oschel, T.: Granular dampers: does particle shape mat- ter? New Journal of Physics 18(7), 073049 (2016)

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Journal of Sound and Vibra- tion 554, 117690 (2023)

    Terzioglu, F., Rongong, J.A., Lord, C.E.: Influence of particle sphericity on granu- lar dampers operating in the bouncing bed motional phase. Journal of Sound and Vibra- tion 554, 117690 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46(5), 697–714 (2017)

    Lu, Z., Chen, X., Zhang, D., Dai, K.: Exper- imental and analytical study on the perfor- mance of particle tuned mass dampers under seismic excitation. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 46(5), 697–714 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Scientific reports 3(1), 2158 (2013)

    Pacheco-V´ azquez, F., Dorbolo, S.: Rebound Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 16 Article Title of a confined granular material: combination of a bouncing ball and a granular damper. Scientific reports 3(1), 2158 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Journal of Sound and Vibration 331(20), 4389–4394 (2012)

    S´ anchez, M., Rosenthal, G., Pugnaloni, L.A.: Universal response of optimal granular damp- ing devices. Journal of Sound and Vibration 331(20), 4389–4394 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Powder Technology 208(1), 215–224 (2011)

    Rozenblat, Y., Portnikov, D., Levy, A., Kalman, H., Aman, S., Tomas, J.: Strength distribution of particles under compression. Powder Technology 208(1), 215–224 (2011)

    2011

  2. [10]

    Physical Review E 64(5), 051301 (2001)

    Samadani, A., Kudrolli, A.: Angle of repose and segregation in cohesive granular matter. Physical Review E 64(5), 051301 (2001)

    2001

  3. [11]

    Physical review letters 62(1), 40 (1989)

    Jaeger, H., Liu, C.-h., Nagel, S.R.: Relaxation at the angle of repose. Physical review letters 62(1), 40 (1989)

    1989

  4. [12]

    Physical Review E 55(5), 5759 (1997)

    Boutreux, T., Rapha¨ el, E., De Gennes, P.: Propagation of a pressure step in a granular material: The role of wall friction. Physical Review E 55(5), 5759 (1997)

    1997

  5. [13]

    Physical Review Research 3(1), 013190 (2021)

    Pacheco-V´ azquez, F., Omura, T., Katsuragi, H.: Undulating compression and multistage relaxation in a granular column consisting of dust particles or glass beads. Physical Review Research 3(1), 013190 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Chemical engineering science 15(3-4), 260–269 (1961)

    Beverloo, W.A., Leniger, H.A., Van de Velde, J.: The flow of granular solids through ori- fices. Chemical engineering science 15(3-4), 260–269 (1961)

    1961

  7. [15]

    Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 84(1), 011307 (2011)

    Hilton, J., Cleary, P.: Granular flow dur- ing hopper discharge. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 84(1), 011307 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Physical review letters 108(24), 248001 (2012)

    Janda, A., Zuriguel, I., Maza, D.: Flow rate of particles through apertures obtained from self-similar density¡? format?¿ and veloc- ity profiles. Physical review letters 108(24), 248001 (2012)

    2012

  9. [17]

    Phys- ical review letters 114(23), 238002 (2015)

    Rubio-Largo, S.M., Janda, A., Maza, D., Zuriguel, I., Hidalgo, R.: Disentangling the free-fall arch paradox in silo discharge. Phys- ical review letters 114(23), 238002 (2015)

    2015

  10. [18]

    Physical Review E101(2), 022901 (2020)

    Are´ an, M., Boschan, A., Cachile, M.A., Aguirre, M.A.: Granular flow through an aperture: Influence of obstacles near the out- let. Physical Review E101(2), 022901 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Phys- ical Review E 102(4), 042907 (2020)

    Opsomer, E., Merminod, S., Schockmel, J., Vandewalle, N., Berhanu, M., Falcon, E.: Patterns in magnetic granular media at the crossover from two to three dimensions. Phys- ical Review E 102(4), 042907 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Nature Communications 12(1), 2486 (2021)

    Thorens, L., M ˚ aløy, K.J., Bourgoin, M., San- tucci, S.: Magnetic janssen effect. Nature Communications 12(1), 2486 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Papers in physics 7(2), 0–0 (2015)

    Lumay, G., Schockmel, J., Hen´ andez- Enr ´ ıquez, D., Dorbolo, S., Vandewalle, N., Pacheco-Vazquez, F.: Flow of magnetic repelling grains in a two-dimensional silo. Papers in physics 7(2), 0–0 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 78(6), 061302 (2008)

    Lumay, G., Vandewalle, N.: Controlled flow of smart powders. Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 78(6), 061302 (2008)

    2008

  15. [23]

    Granular Matter 24(4), 105 (2022)

    Modesto, J., Dorbolo, S., Katsuragi, H., Pacheco-V´ azquez, F., Sobral, Y.D.: Exper- imental and numerical investigation of the compression and expansion of a granular bed of repelling magnetic disks. Granular Matter 24(4), 105 (2022)

    2022

  16. [24]

    Europhysics letters 115(6), 64003 (2016)

    Cox, M., Wang, D., Bar´ es, J., Behringer, R.P.: Self-organized magnetic particles to tune the mechanical behavior of a granu- lar system. Europhysics letters 115(6), 64003 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics 158(21) (2023)

    Tsuchikusa, K., Yamamoto, K., Katsura, M., de Paula, C., Modesto, J., Dorbolo, S., Pacheco-V´ azquez, F., Sobral, Y., Katsuragi, H.: Disordering two-dimensional magnet- particle configurations using bidispersity. The Journal of Chemical Physics 158(21) (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 620, 128768 (2023)

    L´ opez-Gonz´ alez, F., Pacheco-V´ azquez, F., Donado, F.: Ordering of a granular layer of Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template Article Title 17 cubes under strain-induced shear and vibra- tion. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 620, 128768 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    https://www

    Neodymium disks. https://www. imanes.com.mx/discos de neodimio/ 118-iman-de-neodimio-disco-0197-x-0118. html. Accessed: April 15, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    https://www

    Neodymium bars. https://www. imanes.com.mx/blocks-de-neodimio/ 65-iman-de-neodimio-block-0600-x-0260-x-0110. html. Accessed: April 15, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Powder technology 330, 397–417 (2018)

    Al-Hashemi, H.M.B., Al-Amoudi, O.S.B.: A review on the angle of repose of granular materials. Powder technology 330, 397–417 (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(38), 2107965118 (2021)

    Elekes, F., Parteli, E.J.: An expression for the angle of repose of dry cohesive granular materials on earth and in planetary environ- ments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(38), 2107965118 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    Advanced Powder Tech- nology 28(8), 1972–1976 (2017)

    Khanal, M., Elmouttie, M., Adhikary, D.: Effects of particle shapes to achieve angle of repose and force displacement behaviour on granular assembly. Advanced Powder Tech- nology 28(8), 1972–1976 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    Granular Matter 8(2), 59–65 (2006)

    Sperl, M.: Experiments on corn pressure in silo cells–translation and comment of janssen’s paper from 1895. Granular Matter 8(2), 59–65 (2006)

    2006

  25. [33]

    Vereins Eutscher Ingenieure Zeitschrift 39, 1045–1049 (1895)

    Janssen, H.: Investigations of pressure of grain in silo. Vereins Eutscher Ingenieure Zeitschrift 39, 1045–1049 (1895)

  26. [34]

    Annalen der Physik und Chemie 46, 423 (1839)

    Hagen, G.H.L. Annalen der Physik und Chemie 46, 423 (1839)

  27. [35]

    Tighe, B.P., Sperl, M.: Pressure and motion of dry sand: translation of hagen’s paper from

  28. [36]

    The European Physical Journal B- Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 11, 525–533 (1999)

    Vanel, L., Cl´ ement, E.: Pressure screening and fluctuations at the bottom of a granular column. The European Physical Journal B- Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 11, 525–533 (1999)

    1999

  29. [37]

    Physical review letters 84(7), 1439 (2000)

    Vanel, L., Claudin, P., Bouchaud, J.-P., Cates, M., Cl´ ement, E., Wittmer, J.: Stresses in silos: comparison between theoretical mod- els and new experiments. Physical review letters 84(7), 1439 (2000)

    2000

  30. [38]

    The European Physical Journal E 18, 245–252 (2005)

    Bratberg, I., M ˚ aløy, K., Hansen, A.: Valid- ity of the janssen law in narrow granular columns. The European Physical Journal E 18, 245–252 (2005)

    2005

  31. [39]

    Granular Matter 18(4), 85 (2016)

    Huang, Y., Daniels, K.E.: Friction and pressure-dependence of force chain communi- ties in granular materials. Granular Matter 18(4), 85 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    Springer, ??? (2016)

    Katsuragi, H., et al.: Physics of Soft Impact and Cratering. Springer, ??? (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Physical review letters 90(14), 144301 (2003)

    Bertho, Y., Giorgiutti-Dauphin´ e, F., Hulin, J.-P.: Dynamical janssen effect on granular packing with moving walls. Physical review letters 90(14), 144301 (2003)

    2003

  34. [42]

    Physical Review E 100(2), 022902 (2019)

    Windows-Yule, C., M¨ uhlbauer, S., Cisneros, L.T., Nair, P., Marzulli, V., P¨ oschel, T.: Janssen effect in dynamic particulate sys- tems. Physical Review E 100(2), 022902 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Physical Review Let- ters 112(18), 188001 (2014)

    Karim, M.Y., Corwin, E.I.: Eliminating fric- tion with friction: 2d janssen effect in a friction-driven system. Physical Review Let- ters 112(18), 188001 (2014)

    2014

  36. [44]

    Reviews of modern physics 71(2), 374 (1999)

    de Gennes, P.-G.: Granular matter: a tenta- tive view. Reviews of modern physics 71(2), 374 (1999)

    1999

  37. [45]

    In: EPJ Web of Conferences, vol

    Pacheco-V´ azquez, F., Omura, T., Katsuragi, H.: Grain size effect on the compression and relaxation of a granular column: solid parti- cles vs dust agglomerates. In: EPJ Web of Conferences, vol. 249, p. 07005 (2021). EDP Sciences

    2021

  38. [46]

    Granular Matter 14, 71–76 (2012)

    Valdes, J.R., Fernandes, F.L., Einav, I.: Peri- odic propagation of localized compaction in a brittle granular material. Granular Matter 14, 71–76 (2012)

    2012

  39. [47]

    Nature Physics 11(10), 835–838 (2015)

    Guillard, F., Golshan, P., Shen, L., Valdes, Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 18 Article Title J.R., Einav, I.: Dynamic patterns of com- paction in brittle porous media. Nature Physics 11(10), 835–838 (2015)

    2015

  40. [1852]

    Granular Matter 9, 141–144 (2007)

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.