Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Task-Oriented Human Grasp Synthesis via Context- and Task-Aware Diffusers

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that task-oriented human grasps can be synthesized by first predicting a task-aware contact map from initial and goal scene point clouds, then generating hand pose parameters with a second diffusion model, and that this…

desk verdict A solid benchmark paper with a genuinely new task and representation; the evaluation gaps are real but addressable, so it deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.11287 v1 pith:AWB6BRCB submitted 2025-07-15 cs.CV cs.RO

An-Lun Liu , Yu-Wei Chao , Yi-Ting Chen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.RO
keywords task-orientedhumangraspsynthesistask-awarecontactmapdiffusionmodelshand-objectinteractionscenecontextdatasetMANOhandmodeltaskscore
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces task-oriented human grasp synthesis: given 3D point clouds of a scene before and after an object is relocated, synthesize a human hand pose that picks the object up and sets it down without colliding with the environment. The authors propose a two-stage diffusion framework built on a representation they call the task-aware contact map, which records for each point on the object how close the hand comes during a grasp pose and is generated from both initial and goal scene distance information. They construct a large synthetic dataset for placing, stacking, and shelving, with over 1.38 million task-oriented grasps, and introduce a Task Score metric that combines grasp stability with obstacle penetration in both scenes. In their experiments the method reports the highest Task Score on all three tasks compared with existing grasp synthesizers, and ablations show that the task-aware contact map and the two-stage design each contribute to the gain. If the claim holds, grasp generation would move from object-only reasoning to environment-and-task reasoning, which matters for robots and augmented reality systems that must handle cluttered, task-driven scenarios.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the task-aware contact map, a per-point distance field that records, for each point on the target object's surface, how close the hand mesh comes during a grasp pose, normalized to [0,1]. What makes it task-aware is the conditioning: ContactDiffuser generates the map from the target object point cloud together with two distance maps that encode the shortest distance from the object to nearby obstacles in the initial and goal scenes, so the map implicitly carries information about where the hand cannot go and what the goal requires. GraspDiffuser then consumes the map as an extra feature channel beside the object point-cloud features, using self- and cross-attention to map it to MANO hand parameters (the pose and shape coefficients of a parametric hand model), with penetration, reconstruction, and contact-consistency losses keeping the output physically plausible.

What would settle it

Run the method on a placing task where the goal pose forces the wrist to rotate or the object to be set down in an orientation different from pickup, and measure goal-scene obstacle penetration and Task Score; if the shared task-aware contact map cannot yield a collision-free goal grasp, the coherence assumption fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that modeling the scene context and the downstream task explicitly, through a learned task-aware contact map, is what makes a grasp synthesizer succeed at tasks like placing, stacking, and shelving. The pipeline has two diffusion models: ContactDiffuser takes the initial and goal scene point clouds along with their distance maps and predicts a task-aware contact map, which encodes the per-point distance from the target object to the hand in a grasp pose; GraspDiffuser then takes that contact map plus the object point cloud and predicts MANO hand parameters (the pose and shape coefficients of a parametric hand model), with auxiliary reconstruction, penetration, and consistency losses. On the proposed dataset and its Task Score metric, which multiplies qualified ratio by the two obstacle-penetration complements, the method reports the best Task Score among GraspTTA, F-GraspTTA, ContactGen, SceneDiffuser, and FLEX for Placing, Stacking, and Shelving, with the largest margins coming from lower goal-scene obstacle penetration. The paper also shows that replacing object-centric contact maps with task-aware ones improves task score in both its own framework and a modified GraspTTA baseline, and that ground-truth contact maps raise Task Score further, indicating headroom in contact map prediction.

Load-bearing premise

The pipeline assumes that a single task-aware contact map can describe a hand pose that stays valid both when picking up the object and when placing it, so any task that requires re-grasping, a different wrist orientation, or a different hand pose in the goal scene would break the conditioning scheme.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A grasp synthesizer that conditions on both initial and goal scenes should produce grasps whose goal-pose collisions are much rarer, addressing the failure mode of object-centric methods that only check the pickup pose.
  • The task-aware contact map is transferable: feeding it to a different grasp solver (Modified-GraspTTA) improves that solver's task score on Placing and Stacking, so the representation can be reused outside the authors' own diffuser.
  • The proposed Task Score, which combines qualified ratio with obstacle penetration percentages in both scenes, gives a single number that measures task-level success rather than only local grasp quality.
  • The generated initial and goal hand poses can serve as reference poses for downstream hand motion synthesis, since the paper positions its output as an intermediate step toward motion generation.
  • Small objects remain a weak point: the paper reports that its contact maps are less distinguishable for small bricks, and stacking shows smaller gains than placing or shelving.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same two-stage conditioning could be extended to tasks that involve re-grasping or handovers, but only if the coherence assumption is dropped and the model is allowed to produce different contact maps or wrist orientations for pickup and placement.
  • The goal scene point cloud is provided as input in the current synthetic setting; in real deployment a system would need to predict or observe the goal scene, and the task-aware contact map could be repurposed as a learned intermediate target for a planner that proposes the goal scene itself.
  • Because the contact map cleanly separates 'where to touch' from 'how to pose the hand,' it could be used as a training signal for robotic grippers, where the hand pose is chosen by a robot-specific policy rather than by a MANO regression.
  • The Task Score metric could plausibly become a standard evaluation for future task-conditioned grasp methods, though it depends on simulated scene point clouds and would need an extension to real sensor data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a new task, task-oriented human grasp synthesis, where a human grasp must be collision-free in both an initial and a goal scene and must support a downstream task such as Placing, Stacking, or Shelving. The main contribution is a two-stage pipeline: ContactDiffuser predicts a task-aware contact map from the initial and goal scene point clouds and their distance maps, and GraspDiffuser synthesizes MANO hand parameters conditioned on that contact map. The authors also contribute a large synthetic dataset (571,908 grasps for Placing, 2,989 for Stacking, 807,028 for Shelving) and a new metric, Task Score (TS), defined as QR × (1 − Init OPP) × (1 − Goal OPP). Experiments compare against GraspTTA, F-GraspTTA, ContactGen, SceneDiffuser, and FLEX, reporting that the proposed method achieves the best TS on all three tasks. The paper includes ablations of the two diffusers and of task-aware versus object-centric contact maps, plus a small human study.

Significance. If the empirical claims hold, the paper makes a useful contribution by defining a concrete benchmark for scene- and task-aware grasp synthesis and by demonstrating that a learned intermediate contact-map representation can reduce collisions in goal scenes. The dataset, while synthetic, is large and systematically generated, and the comparison against several recent baselines is a strength. However, the central evidence for the novelty of the task-aware contact map is weaker than the headline numbers suggest: the learned ContactDiffuser recovers only part of the ground-truth upper bound, and the improvement over an object-centric contact map baseline is small and inconsistent across tasks. The absence of variance or significance testing makes it hard to distinguish the proposed method's advantage from run-to-run noise. The paper is honest about its limitations (small objects, coherence assumption, synthetic setup), which is commendable, but those limitations directly bound the generality of the conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2, Tables 1–4] The evaluation reports a single run per configuration with no confidence intervals, significance tests, or repeated-seed analysis. The test sets are small (21 objects × 10 configurations for Placing/Shelving, 6 bricks × 10 for Stacking), so the headline TS margins—0.053 over FLEX in Placing and 0.026 in Shelving—could plausibly be within run-to-run variation. Since the central claim is that the method 'achieves the best performance in TS among all tasks' (Section 5.3), the authors should report standard deviations across seeds or at least statistical significance (e.g., paired tests across objects) for the TS differences against the closest baselines.
  2. [Table 2 and Table 4] The load-bearing claim that task-aware contact maps are crucial is only weakly supported by the numbers. In Table 2, the learned pipeline (TA) reaches TS 0.570 on Placing and 0.552 on Shelving, while the same GraspDiffuser with ground-truth maps (GT) reaches 0.660 and 0.610, leaving roughly 58% and 57% of the GT-vs-OC gap unrecovered. More importantly, Table 4 shows that replacing the task-aware ContactDiffuser with an object-centric ContactCVAE baseline yields TS 0.549 vs. 0.563 on Placing, 0.690 vs. 0.687 on Stacking (where the task-aware version loses), and 0.469 vs. 0.550 on Shelving. The improvement is therefore modest and inconsistent, and without significance testing the claim that 'task-aware contact maps are more effective at extracting task-relevant information' (Introduction) is not robustly established. The authors should either tighten the claim, add significance testing, or provide a more granular analysis (e.g., per-object breakdown) to show where the task-aware map helps.
  3. [§5.2, §3.3, Limitations] The evaluation metric TS is constructed from QR, Init OPP, and Goal OPP, and the QR thresholds (PV ≤ 3×10⁻⁶ cm³, SD ≤ 2 cm) are very close to the dataset filtering thresholds (PV ≤ 4×10⁻⁶ cm³, SD ≤ 3 cm) used when constructing the prior pose set. Because all training grasps are generated by DexGraspNet and then filtered to satisfy essentially the same physical-plausibility criteria used in evaluation, the absolute QR values may be inflated relative to what would be obtained on independently captured grasps. The authors should discuss this potential coupling and, if possible, evaluate on a held-out set of grasps that were not filtered by the same thresholds.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 6] The heading 'Conculsion' is a typo for 'Conclusion'.
  2. [Section 3.2] The phrase 'If no obstables collide with the object' contains a typo ('obstables' should be 'obstacles').
  3. [Section 2] In the first paragraph of Related Work, 'Object offordance' should be 'Object affordance'.
  4. [Table 1] In the Stacking row for FLEX, the entry '10.65 / 0' for SD and '0/0' for some metrics is formatted inconsistently; please align the table formatting so that all entries follow the same convention.
  5. [Section 4.3] The consistency loss is defined as ∥C − C′∥², where C is the ground-truth contact map, but the text says 'C is the ground truth contact map' while the model is conditioned on predicted maps; please clarify whether C here is the ground-truth map used only for training or also for inference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the contributions are empirical, the evaluation metrics are not identical to the training targets, and the consistency loss is standard cycle-consistency rather than a self-fulfilling prediction.

full rationale

The paper makes no theoretical derivation that reduces to its inputs. The two-stage pipeline trains ContactDiffuser to predict task-aware contact maps from initial/goal distance maps and GraspDiffuser to synthesize MANO grasps conditioned on those maps; the grasp predictions are evaluated with physical plausibility, stability, and collision metrics (PV, SD, CR, QR, OPP, TS) that are not identical to the training targets. The consistency loss Lcons = ||C - C'||2 is a standard cycle-consistency term that makes the predicted hand mesh agree with the conditioning contact map, not a term that by construction forces the reported TS. The TS metric is defined as a product of existing metrics, but that is a deliberate evaluation definition, not a derivation of the method's performance. The dataset filtering thresholds (4e-6 cm3, 3 cm) and QR thresholds (3e-6 cm3, 2 cm) are close but not identical; moreover the QR thresholds are stricter, so satisfying the dataset filter does not by itself guarantee passing QR, and OPP is computed from collision checking rather than from the fit. The few self-citations (e.g., SceneDiffuser [22] as architectural inspiration, and Chao et al. dataset papers) are not load-bearing; no uniqueness theorem or prior claim by the present authors is invoked to forbid alternatives. The absence of variance/significance testing and the gap between predicted and ground-truth contact maps are legitimate scientific concerns, but they concern robustness and effect size, not circularity. Therefore the derivation chain is self-contained and no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. The free parameters are empirical choices (loss weights, distance scaling, filtering and evaluation thresholds, point cloud sizes) that are not derived from first principles and that influence the reported results. The axioms are the standard hand model, simulator, prior grasp generator, and diffusion formulation on which the pipeline depends.

free parameters (4)
  • Loss weights w1-w4 = Placing/Shelving: 15, 1, 5, 0.002; Stacking: 10, 1, 3, 0.005
    Set empirically per task; balance diffusion denoising, mesh reconstruction, penetration, and consistency losses, and directly affect all reported grasp quality metrics.
  • Distance map scaling alpha = alpha=30 for scene distance maps; alpha=100 for contact maps
    Chosen by hand to stretch normalized distances into [0,1]; controls the conditioning signal strength for the diffusers.
  • Dataset and evaluation thresholds = Filtering: penetration volume 4e-6 cm^3, displacement 3 cm; Evaluation QR: 3e-6 cm^3, 2 cm
    Used to build ground truth and to compute QR and TS; the similarity between training and evaluation criteria may favor the proposed method.
  • Point cloud sizes = N=2048 (object), Ns=6000 (scene)
    Adopted from SceneDiffuser; affects representation resolution but is not central to the claim.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption MANO hand model parameterization with 10 shape and 51 pose and root parameters
    The method generates hand poses in the MANO space and assumes a fixed hand shape beta; the validity of all grasp outputs depends on MANO being an adequate hand model.
  • domain assumption PyBullet physics simulation provides reliable ground truth for stability and collision
    Dataset generation, filtering, and the Simulation Displacement metric all rely on PyBullet; if the simulator is inaccurate, the ground truth labels and evaluation are biased.
  • domain assumption DexGraspNet grasps are a valid prior pose set for human-like grasps
    The dataset is built by filtering DexGraspNet outputs; the validity of the ground truth grasps is inherited from DexGraspNet's force closure and the authors' manual filtering.
  • standard math Diffusion model denoising objective (Ho et al.) is applicable to contact maps and MANO parameters
    The training uses the simplified DDPM loss; this is a standard, accepted objective.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Task-Oriented Human Grasp Synthesis via Context- and Task-Aware Diffusers." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AWB6BRCB

@misc{pith2026250711287,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Task-Oriented Human Grasp Synthesis via Context- and Task-Aware Diffusers},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AWB6BRCB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.11287}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study task-oriented human grasp synthesis, a new grasp synthesis task that demands both task and context awareness. At the core of our method is the task-aware contact maps. Unlike traditional contact maps that only reason about the manipulated object and its relation with the hand, our enhanced maps take into account scene and task information. This comprehensive map is critical for hand-object interaction, enabling accurate grasping poses that align with the task. We propose a two-stage pipeline that first constructs a task-aware contact map informed by the scene and task. In the subsequent stage, we use this contact map to synthesize task-oriented human grasps. We introduce a new dataset and a metric for the proposed task to evaluate our approach. Our experiments validate the importance of modeling both scene and task, demonstrating significant improvements over existing methods in both grasp quality and task performance. See our project page for more details: https://hcis-lab.github.io/TOHGS/

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.11287 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Task-oriented human grasp synthesis aims to synthesize [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Examples of Placing, Stacking, and Shelving. ages [38], video [6], human motions [46], 3D objects [34], and robot actions [12]. Recently, Huang et al. [22] propose SceneDiffuser, a diffusion model-based framework for 3D scene-conditioned human motion, robot motion, and dex￾terous robotics hand motion generation. Inspired by their work, we devise diffusion models for task-oriented human grasp synthesis. Our work diff… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An overview of our proposed task-oriented human grasp synthesis framework. Given 3D initial and goal scenes, our goal is to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Failure examples. The proposed method struggles with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Visualization of predicted human grasps by Ours, Con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dexterous functional grasping

    Ananye Agarwal, Shagun Uppal, Kenneth Shaw, and Deepak Pathak. Dexterous functional grasping. In 7th Annual Con- ference on Robot Learning, 2023. 1

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Dexart: Benchmarking generalizable dexterous manipu- lation with articulated objects

    Chen Bao, Helin Xu, Yuzhe Qin, and Xiaolong Wang. Dexart: Benchmarking generalizable dexterous manipu- lation with articulated objects. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 21190–21200, 2023. 1

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Contactdb: Analyzing and predicting grasp contact via thermal imaging

    Samarth Brahmbhatt, Cusuh Ham, Charles C Kemp, and James Hays. Contactdb: Analyzing and predicting grasp contact via thermal imaging. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8709–8719, 2019. 1, 2

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Contactpose: A dataset of grasps with object contact and hand pose

    Samarth Brahmbhatt, Chengcheng Tang, Christopher D Twigg, Charles C Kemp, and James Hays. Contactpose: A dataset of grasps with object contact and hand pose. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XIII 16, pages 361–378. Springer, 2020. 1, 2

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Braun, S

    J. Braun, S. Christen, M. Kocabas, E. Aksan, and O. Hilliges. Physically Plausible Full-body Hand-Object Interaction Syn- thesis. In International Conference on 3D Vision, 2024. 1

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Video generation models as world simulators

    Tim Brooks, Bill Peebles, Connor Homes, Will DePue, Yufei Guo, Li Jing, David Schnurr, Joe Taylor, Troy Luhman, Eric Luhman, Clarence Wing Yin Ng, Ricky Wang, and Aditya Ramesh. Video generation models as world simulators

    work page

  7. [7]

    Reconstructing hand-object interactions in the wild

    Zhe Cao, Ilija Radosavovic, Angjoo Kanazawa, and Jitendra Malik. Reconstructing hand-object interactions in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 12417–12426, 2021. 1

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Shapenet: An information-rich 3d model repository

    Angel X Chang, Thomas Funkhouser, Leonidas Guibas, Pat Hanrahan, Qixing Huang, Zimo Li, Silvio Savarese, Manolis Savva, Shuran Song, Hao Su, et al. Shapenet: An information-rich 3d model repository. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.03012, 2015. 3

    arXiv 2015

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    Dexycb: A benchmark for capturing hand grasping of objects

    Yu-Wei Chao, Wei Yang, Yu Xiang, Pavlo Molchanov, Ankur Handa, Jonathan Tremblay, Yashraj S Narang, Karl Van Wyk, Umar Iqbal, Stan Birchfield, et al. Dexycb: A benchmark for capturing hand grasping of objects. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and ...

    2021

  2. [10]

    Handoversim: A simulation framework and benchmark for human-to-robot object han- dovers

    Yu-Wei Chao, Chris Paxton, Yu Xiang, Wei Yang, Bal- akumar Sundaralingam, Tao Chen, Adithyavairavan Murali, Maya Cakmak, and Dieter Fox. Handoversim: A simulation framework and benchmark for human-to-robot object han- dovers. In 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Au...

    2022

  3. [11]

    Alignsdf: Pose-aligned signed distance fields for hand-object reconstruction

    Zerui Chen, Yana Hasson, Cordelia Schmid, and Ivan Laptev. Alignsdf: Pose-aligned signed distance fields for hand-object reconstruction. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 231–248. Springer, 2022. 1

    2022

  4. [12]

    Diffu- sion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion

    Cheng Chi, Siyuan Feng, Yilun Du, Zhenjia Xu, Eric Cousineau, Benjamin Burchfiel, and Shuran Song. Diffu- sion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04137, 2023. 3

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    D-grasp: Physically plausible dynamic grasp synthesis for hand-object interac- tions

    Sammy Christen, Muhammed Kocabas, Emre Aksan, Jemin Hwangbo, Jie Song, and Otmar Hilliges. D-grasp: Physically plausible dynamic grasp synthesis for hand-object interac- tions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 20577–20586,

  6. [14]

    Synh2r: Synthesizing hand- object motions for learning human-to-robot handovers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05599, 2023

    Sammy Christen, Lan Feng, Wei Yang, Yu-Wei Chao, Ot- mar Hilliges, and Jie Song. Synh2r: Synthesizing hand- object motions for learning human-to-robot handovers.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.05599, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Ganhand: Predicting human grasp affordances in multi-object scenes

    Enric Corona, Albert Pumarola, Guillem Alenya, Francesc Moreno-Noguer, and Gr ´egory Rogez. Ganhand: Predicting human grasp affordances in multi-object scenes. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5031–5041, 2020. 1, 2

    2020

  8. [16]

    Pybullet, a python mod- ule for physics simulation for games, robotics and machine learning

    Erwin Coumans and Yunfei Bai. Pybullet, a python mod- ule for physics simulation for games, robotics and machine learning. http://pybullet.org, 2016–2021. 3, 6

    2016

  9. [17]

    First-person hand action bench- mark with rgb-d videos and 3d hand pose annotations

    Guillermo Garcia-Hernando, Shanxin Yuan, Seungryul Baek, and Tae-Kyun Kim. First-person hand action bench- mark with rgb-d videos and 3d hand pose annotations. In Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018. 1, 2

    2018

  10. [18]

    Con- tactopt: Optimizing contact to improve grasps

    Patrick Grady, Chengcheng Tang, Christopher D Twigg, Minh V o, Samarth Brahmbhatt, and Charles C Kemp. Con- tactopt: Optimizing contact to improve grasps. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1471–1481, 2021. 1, 2, 5

    2021

  11. [19]

    Honnotate: A method for 3d annotation of hand and object poses

    Shreyas Hampali, Mahdi Rad, Markus Oberweger, and Vin- cent Lepetit. Honnotate: A method for 3d annotation of hand and object poses. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF con- ference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 3196–3206, 2020. 1, 2

    2020

  12. [20]

    Black, Ivan Laptev, and Cordelia Schmid

    Yana Hasson, G ¨ul Varol, Dimitrios Tzionas, Igor Kale- vatykh, Michael J. Black, Ivan Laptev, and Cordelia Schmid. Learning joint reconstruction of hands and manipulated ob- jects. In CVPR, 2019. 1, 2

    2019

  13. [21]

    Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising dif- fusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020. 2, 4, 5

    2020

  14. [22]

    Diffusion- based generation, optimization, and planning in 3d scenes

    Siyuan Huang, Zan Wang, Puhao Li, Baoxiong Jia, Tengyu Liu, Yixin Zhu, Wei Liang, and Song-Chun Zhu. Diffusion- based generation, optimization, and planning in 3d scenes. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 16750–16761, 2...

    2023

  15. [23]

    Affordpose: A large-scale dataset of hand-object inter- actions with affordance-driven hand pose

    Juntao Jian, Xiuping Liu, Manyi Li, Ruizhen Hu, and Jian Liu. Affordpose: A large-scale dataset of hand-object inter- actions with affordance-driven hand pose. In Proceedings 9 of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vi- sion, pages 14713–14724, 2023. 1, 2

    2023

  16. [24]

    Hand-object contact consistency reasoning for human grasps generation

    Hanwen Jiang, Shaowei Liu, Jiashun Wang, and Xiaolong Wang. Hand-object contact consistency reasoning for human grasps generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Interna- tional Conference on Computer Vision, pages 11107–11116,

  17. [25]

    Grasp- ing field: Learning implicit representations for human grasps

    Korrawe Karunratanakul, Jinlong Yang, Yan Zhang, Michael J Black, Krikamol Muandet, and Siyu Tang. Grasp- ing field: Learning implicit representations for human grasps. In 2020 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), pages 333–344. IEEE, 2020. 1

    2020

  18. [26]

    A skeleton-driven neural occupancy representation for articulated hands

    Korrawe Karunratanakul, Adrian Spurr, Zicong Fan, Otmar Hilliges, and Siyu Tang. A skeleton-driven neural occupancy representation for articulated hands. In 2021 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), pages 11–21. IEEE, 2021. 3, 5, 6

    2021

  19. [27]

    Neuralgrasps: Learning implicit representations for grasps of multiple robotic hands

    Ninad Khargonkar, Neil Song, Zesheng Xu, Balakrishnan Prabhakaran, and Yu Xiang. Neuralgrasps: Learning implicit representations for grasps of multiple robotic hands. In Con- ference on Robot Learning , pages 516–526. PMLR, 2023. 1

    2023

  20. [28]

    Contact2grasp: 3d grasp synthesis via hand-object contact constraint

    Haoming Li, Xinzhuo Lin, Yang Zhou, Xiang Li, Yuchi Huo, Jiming Chen, and Qi Ye. Contact2grasp: 3d grasp synthesis via hand-object contact constraint. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.09245, 2022. 1, 2, 5

    2022 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Dexrepnet: Learning dexterous robotic grasping network with geomet- ric and spatial hand-object representations

    Qingtao Liu, Yu Cui, Zhengnan Sun, Haoming Li, Gaofeng Li, Lin Shao, Jiming Chen, and Qi Ye. Dexrepnet: Learning dexterous robotic grasping network with geomet- ric and spatial hand-object representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.09806, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Semi-supervised 3d hand-object poses es- timation with interactions in time

    Shaowei Liu, Hanwen Jiang, Jiarui Xu, Sifei Liu, and Xi- aolong Wang. Semi-supervised 3d hand-object poses es- timation with interactions in time. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14687–14697, 2021. 1

    2021

  23. [31]

    Joint hand motion and interaction hotspots prediction from egocentric videos

    Shaowei Liu, Subarna Tripathi, Somdeb Majumdar, and Xi- aolong Wang. Joint hand motion and interaction hotspots prediction from egocentric videos. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 3282–3292, 2022. 1

    2022

  24. [32]

    Contactgen: Generative contact modeling for grasp generation

    Shaowei Liu, Yang Zhou, Jimei Yang, Saurabh Gupta, and Shenlong Wang. Contactgen: Generative contact modeling for grasp generation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF In- ternational Conference on Computer Vision , pages 20609– 20620, 2023. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8

    2023

  25. [33]

    Dexvip: Learning dexterous grasping with human hand pose priors from video

    Priyanka Mandikal and Kristen Grauman. Dexvip: Learning dexterous grasping with human hand pose priors from video. In Conference on Robot Learning , pages 651–661. PMLR,

  26. [34]

    Point-e: A system for generat- ing 3d point clouds from complex prompts

    Alex Nichol, Heewoo Jun, Prafulla Dhariwal, Pamela Mishkin, and Mark Chen. Point-e: A system for generat- ing 3d point clouds from complex prompts. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.08751, 2022. 3

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space

    Charles Ruizhongtai Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J Guibas. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. 5

    2017

  28. [36]

    Dexmv: Imitation learning for dexterous manipulation from human videos

    Yuzhe Qin, Yueh-Hua Wu, Shaowei Liu, Hanwen Jiang, Rui- han Yang, Yang Fu, and Xiaolong Wang. Dexmv: Imitation learning for dexterous manipulation from human videos. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 570–587. Springer, 2022. 1

    2022

  29. [37]

    Javier Romero, Dimitrios Tzionas, and Michael J. Black. Embodied hands: Modeling and capturing hands and bod- ies together. ACM Transactions on Graphics, (Proc. SIG- GRAPH Asia), 36(6), 2017. 3, 6

    2017

  30. [38]

    Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding

    Chitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li, Jay Whang, Emily L Denton, Kamyar Ghasemipour, Raphael Gontijo Lopes, Burcu Karagol Ayan, Tim Salimans, et al. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Advances in Neural Information...

    2022

  31. [39]

    Understanding human hands in contact at inter- net scale

    Dandan Shan, Jiaqi Geng, Michelle Shu, and David F Fouhey. Understanding human hands in contact at inter- net scale. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 9869–9878,

  32. [40]

    Learning structured output representation using deep conditional gen- erative models

    Kihyuk Sohn, Honglak Lee, and Xinchen Yan. Learning structured output representation using deep conditional gen- erative models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 28, 2015. 5

    2015

  33. [41]

    Augmented reality and robotics: A sur- vey and taxonomy for ar-enhanced human-robot interaction and robotic interfaces

    Ryo Suzuki, Adnan Karim, Tian Xia, Hooman Hedayati, and Nicolai Marquardt. Augmented reality and robotics: A sur- vey and taxonomy for ar-enhanced human-robot interaction and robotic interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Con- ference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,...

    2022

  34. [42]

    Grab: A dataset of whole-body human grasp- ing of objects

    Omid Taheri, Nima Ghorbani, Michael J Black, and Dim- itrios Tzionas. Grab: A dataset of whole-body human grasp- ing of objects. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th Eu- ropean Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Pro- ceedings, Part IV 16, pages 581–600. Springer, 2020....

    2020

  35. [43]

    Taheri, V

    O. Taheri, V . Choutas, M.J. Black, and D. Tzionas. GOAL: Generating 4D Wholebody Motion for Hand-Object Grasp- ing. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023. 1

    2023

  36. [44]

    Egodistill: Egocentric head motion distillation for efficient video understanding

    Shuhan Tan, Tushar Nagarajan, and Kristen Grauman. Egodistill: Egocentric head motion distillation for efficient video understanding. Advances in Neural Information Pro- cessing Systems, 36, 2023. 1

    2023

  37. [45]

    Flex: Full- body grasping without full-body grasps

    Purva Tendulkar, D´ıdac Sur´ıs, and Carl V ondrick. Flex: Full- body grasping without full-body grasps. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 21179–21189, 2023. 1, 5, 6, 7, 8

    2023

  38. [46]

    Human motion diffu- sion model

    Guy Tevet, Sigal Raab, Brian Gordon, Yoni Shafir, Daniel Cohen-or, and Amit Haim Bermano. Human motion diffu- sion model. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023. 3

    2023

  39. [47]

    Attention is all you need

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszko- reit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. 5

    2017

  40. [48]

    Unidexgrasp++: Im- 10 proving dexterous grasping policy learning via geometry- aware curriculum and iterative generalist-specialist learning

    Weikang Wan, Haoran Geng, Yun Liu, Zikang Shan, Yaodong Yang, Li Yi, and He Wang. Unidexgrasp++: Im- 10 proving dexterous grasping policy learning via geometry- aware curriculum and iterative generalist-specialist learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.00464, 2023. 1

    2023 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Dexgraspnet: A large-scale robotic dexterous grasp dataset for general ob- jects based on simulation

    Ruicheng Wang, Jialiang Zhang, Jiayi Chen, Yinzhen Xu, Puhao Li, Tengyu Liu, and He Wang. Dexgraspnet: A large-scale robotic dexterous grasp dataset for general ob- jects based on simulation. In 2023 IEEE International Con- ference on Robotics and Automation , pages 11359–1136...

    2023

  42. [50]

    Learning score-based grasping primitive for human-assisting dexterous grasping

    Tianhao Wu, Mingdong Wu, Jiyao Zhang, Yunchong Gan, and Hao Dong. Learning score-based grasping primitive for human-assisting dexterous grasping. Advances in Neural In- formation Processing Systems, 36, 2024. 1

    2024

  43. [51]

    Learning generalizable dexterous manipulation from human grasp af- fordance

    Yueh-Hua Wu, Jiashun Wang, and Xiaolong Wang. Learning generalizable dexterous manipulation from human grasp af- fordance. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 618–629. PMLR, 2023. 1

    2023

  44. [52]

    Unidexgrasp: Universal robotic dexterous grasping via learning diverse proposal generation and goal-conditioned policy

    Yinzhen Xu, Weikang Wan, Jialiang Zhang, Haoran Liu, Zikang Shan, Hao Shen, Ruicheng Wang, Haoran Geng, Yijia Weng, Jiayi Chen, et al. Unidexgrasp: Universal robotic dexterous grasping via learning diverse proposal generation and goal-conditioned policy. In Proceedings of the ...

    2023

  45. [53]

    Oakink: A large-scale knowledge repos- itory for understanding hand-object interaction

    Lixin Yang, Kailin Li, Xinyu Zhan, Fei Wu, Anran Xu, Liu Liu, and Cewu Lu. Oakink: A large-scale knowledge repos- itory for understanding hand-object interaction. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 20953–20962, 2022. 1, 2

    2022

  46. [54]

    Diffusion-guided reconstruction of everyday hand- object interaction clips

    Yufei Ye, Poorvi Hebbar, Abhinav Gupta, and Shubham Tul- siani. Diffusion-guided reconstruction of everyday hand- object interaction clips. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 19717– 19728, 2023. 1

    2023

  47. [55]

    Affordance diffusion: Synthesizing hand-object interac- tions

    Yufei Ye, Xueting Li, Abhinav Gupta, Shalini De Mello, Stan Birchfield, Jiaming Song, Shubham Tulsiani, and Sifei Liu. Affordance diffusion: Synthesizing hand-object interac- tions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages ...

  48. [56]

    Graspxl: Generating grasping motions for di- verse objects at scale

    Hui Zhang, Sammy Christen, Zicong Fan, Otmar Hilliges, and Jie Song. Graspxl: Generating grasping motions for di- verse objects at scale. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024. 1

    2024

  49. [57]

    Arti- Grasp: Physically Plausible Synthesis of Bi-Manual Dexter- ous Grasping and Articulation

    Hui Zhang, Sammy Christen, Zicong Fan, Luocheng Zheng, Jemin Hwangbo, Jie Song, and Otmar Hilliges. Arti- Grasp: Physically Plausible Synthesis of Bi-Manual Dexter- ous Grasping and Articulation. In International Conference on 3D Vision, 2024. 1, 2

    2024

  50. [58]

    CAMS: CAnonicalized Manipulation Spaces for Category-Level Functional Hand-Object Manipulation Syn- thesis

    Juntian Zheng, Qingyuan Zheng, Lixing Fang, Yun Liu, and Li Yi. CAMS: CAnonicalized Manipulation Spaces for Category-Level Functional Hand-Object Manipulation Syn- thesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023. 1

    2023

  51. [59]

    Toward human-like grasp: Functional grasp by dex- terous robotic hand via object-hand semantic representation

    Tianqiang Zhu, Rina Wu, Jinglue Hang, Xiangbo Lin, and Yi Sun. Toward human-like grasp: Functional grasp by dex- terous robotic hand via object-hand semantic representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelli- gence, 2023. 1

    2023

  52. [60]

    Understanding tools: Task-oriented object modeling, learning and recogni- tion

    Yixin Zhu, Yibiao Zhao, and Song Chun Zhu. Understanding tools: Task-oriented object modeling, learning and recogni- tion. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2015. 2 11

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.