Patterns, Models, and Challenges in Online Social Media: A Survey

Anita Bonetti; Edoardo Di Martino; Edoardo Loru; Emanuele Sangiorgio; Fabiana Zollo; Giulio Pecile; Irene Scalco; Jacopo Nudo; Mario Edoardo Pandolfo; Matteo Cinelli

REVIEW 2 major objections 8 minor 1 cited by

Patterns, Models, and Challenges in Online Social Media: A Survey

T0 review · 2 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This survey argues that the study of online social media has reached a point where stable cross-platform behavioral regularities provide a shared empirical baseline, and that the field can become cumulative only through comparative…

desk verdict A competent, agenda-setting survey whose load-bearing cross-platform claims need softer wording and a transparency pass before publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13379 v1 pith:3OV7OG24 submitted 2025-07-15 cs.SI cs.CY

Niccolò Di Marco , Anita Bonetti , Edoardo Di Martino , Edoardo Loru , Jacopo Nudo , Mario Edoardo Pandolfo , Giulio Pecile , Emanuele Sangiorgio

show 5 more authors

Irene Scalco Simon Zollo Matteo Cinelli Fabiana Zollo Walter Quattrociocchi

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.SIcs.CY

keywords socialmediaonlinebehaviorcomputationalscienceopiniondynamicsechochambersmisinformationcoordinatedcross-platformanalysis

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey tries to establish that the study of online social behavior now has enough consistent, cross-platform findings to support a shared empirical baseline, and that the field's fragmentation is the main obstacle to cumulative progress. It assembles evidence that patterns such as concentrated attention, echo chambers, misinformation advantage, and coordinated behavior recur across platforms, and it highlights two recent cross-platform regularities—rising toxicity in longer threads and progressive linguistic simplification—as candidate anchors for a common baseline. It then argues that opinion-dynamics models, from voter models to bounded-confidence frameworks, have so far been validated mostly in synthetic settings and must instead be constrained by observed behavioral data. The payoff would be a comparative science of digital behavior that can support prediction, intervention, and platform design.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the shared empirical baseline: a set of behavioral regularities measured consistently across platforms and time, such as heavy-tailed engagement distributions, toxicity growth along thread depth, and language simplification. The paper's comparative strategy—juxtaposing results from six methodological families (observational network analysis, field experiments, surveys, algorithmic audits, browser/panel instrumentation, and simulation) and evaluating them on scale, causality, access, and validation trade-offs—is what carries the argument that fragmentation is structural and surmountable. In the modeling half, the central mechanism is empirical calibration: tying model parameters to measurable exposure and engagement quantities so that models can be tested, as in the example of a polarization model fitted to behavioral data from four platforms.

What would settle it

Re-measure the toxicity-by-thread-depth slope and the linguistic-simplification trend on the same platforms using independently collected data from a different access method (for example, opt-in panel instrumentation instead of official APIs) and the same time windows; if the patterns reverse sign, vanish, or vary widely with sampling, the claimed shared empirical baseline is not stable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that no model of online opinion dynamics is explanatory unless validated against observed behavioral patterns, and that cross-platform longitudinal data now make such validation feasible. It identifies persistent interaction and linguistic patterns, notably increasing toxicity along longer conversation threads and systematic simplification of user language over time, that transcend platform-specific affordances, and reads these as evidence that algorithmic systems often expose and amplify human behavior rather than create conversational dysfunction. The survey synthesizes the empirical record on selective exposure, agenda setting, algorithmic amplification, misinformation, and coordinated inauthentic behavior, and it evaluates the main modeling families—Ising-like influence models, voter models, majority-rule models, and bounded-confidence models—against that record. Its conclusion is that the field should converge on empirically grounded, mechanistically explicit, cross-context validated models, built on multiplatform observatories and shared data infrastructure.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the premise that the empirical regularities presented as stable across platforms—rising toxicity in longer threads and growing linguistic simplification—are genuine features of online behavior and not artifacts of how the data were collected, sampled, or selected for study.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Opinion-dynamics models that cannot be calibrated to observed exposure and engagement data lose their claim to explanation, so the field's benchmark should shift from theoretical elegance to empirical fit.
Cross-platform regularities such as toxicity growth in longer threads and linguistic simplification over time can serve as test beds for any proposed model of online discourse.
Comparisons across platforms with different algorithmic curation can separate system-level effects from endogenous user behavior, making natural experiments more central than they are now.
Platform design that balances engagement signals with exposure diversity, novelty, or reputational indicators becomes a concrete, testable intervention rather than a vague aspiration.
Open, interoperable data infrastructures and longitudinal observatories become preconditions for cumulative research, not optional extras.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the claimed regularities hold under independent data-collection methods, then platform-specific API quirks matter less than engagement-based ranking logic, and policy interventions could target the feedback loop itself rather than individual platforms.
A natural extension the authors leave implicit is a shared benchmark dataset: a standardized multi-platform trace corpus against which competing opinion-dynamics models could be scored on predictive fit.
One testable consequence of the 'expose, not create' reading is that platforms with weaker personalization should still show the same toxicity-depth and simplification trends, just with different baselines; this could be checked with existing data from platforms with minimal algorithmic curation.
The same comparative logic could be applied to intervention effectiveness, for example by comparing prebunking outcomes across platforms with different curation strengths to see whether algorithmic context modulates inoculation.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a good conventional survey, not a breakthrough. The contribution is organizational — a readable synthesis of empirical regularities and opinion-dynamics models, plus a call for comparative, model-validation-focused research. That agenda is useful and, in my view, correct. If you need one up-to-date map of the area to hand a new student, this works.

What it does well: the method taxonomy in Section 3 is genuinely useful; the distinction between what each empirical strategy can and cannot show is well drawn. Section 5 on models is a fair compact history, and the critique that most models are never empirically validated is accurate and important. Section 7 is candid about the limits — including the difficulty of separating platform architecture from endogenous behavior. That candor is a real strength.

Soft spots, in order of size. First, the word 'systematic' is doing more work than the method supports: there is no search strategy, inclusion criteria, or coding protocol. For a CS survey that is acceptable, but don't call it systematic. Second, Section 6 leans hard on [39] and [54] for the cross-platform 'baseline' — toxicity with depth and linguistic simplification over time. Both are real Nature/PNAS papers from the same group. My read is that the stress-test concern is fair as a caution, not as a knockout: the survey's phrase that algorithms 'may not create' dysfunction and 'often expose and amplify' human behavior goes a little beyond what those studies can establish, because they are observational and platform-specific in their data collection. The survey itself says in Section 7 that architecture is hard to disentangle. The fix is to soften Section 6 and explicitly flag the need for independent replication of those two regularities. Third, references: duplicates [206]/[207], weird venue formatting, and the ACM reference block says 2018. Sloppy but easy.

The self-citation density is high, especially around the load-bearing examples, but the cited papers are high-profile peer-reviewed studies, so I don't treat that as a flaw by itself. I'd just want the Section 6 claims to be calibrated to what the evidence supports.

Verdict: worth a serious referee. It is not novel in the sense of new results, but as a synthesis with a research agenda it deserves publication after revision. I'd accept the peer-review invite.

Referee Report

2 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper is a survey of computational social science research on online social media, organized around the shift from self-reported and experimental methods to large-scale behavioral trace data. It reviews methodological families and their limitations, synthesizes empirical phenomena (selective exposure, agenda setting, algorithmic amplification and echo chambers, misinformation, coordinated behavior), summarizes major opinion-dynamics model families, and argues that the field should move toward a comparative, cross-platform empirical baseline and empirically validated models. The paper's distinctive thesis is that persistent cross-platform regularities—especially increasing toxicity with thread depth and systematic linguistic simplification over time—provide a shared baseline against which future models should be tested, and that overcoming fragmentation requires a cumulative, data-anchored research program.

Significance. If its central claims hold, the survey provides a useful map of a fragmented literature and a concrete proposal: models should be evaluated by their fit to cross-platform behavioral regularities, and the field should invest in multiplatform observatories and validation pipelines. The paper's strengths include a broad citation base, a clear table of empirical strategies (Table 1), an explicit limitations section (Section 7), and a consistent emphasis on model validation rather than internal consistency alone. The paper's distinctive contribution, however, is only as strong as the evidence for the claimed cross-platform regularities, which currently rests on a small set of studies and is presented without the robustness assessment that the survey's own methodological discussion would demand.

major comments (2)

[Section 6, paragraphs 2–3, and Section 7, paragraph 2] The Section 6 assertion that 'algorithmic systems may not create conversational dysfunction—they often expose and amplify human behavior that is consistent across platforms' and the characterization of the patterns as 'invariant conversational and linguistic patterns' are supported only by references [39] and [54], both from the same research group. The section does not discuss whether the cross-platform trends could reflect API changes, platform-specific length caps, threading structure, toxicity-classifier calibration, language mix, or historical coverage windows. This is load-bearing because the claimed shared empirical baseline is what motivates the paper's entire validation agenda. Section 7 later concedes that 'the contribution of algorithmic curation, moderation policies, and interface design remains difficult to disentangle from endogenous dynamics,' which directly undercuts the strength of the Section 6 inference. The revision should either present independent replication evidence or substantially qualify the Section 6 claims and explicitly connect them to the Section 7 caveat.
[Section 6] Section 6 is too brief to support the role the paper assigns to it. The two paragraphs citing [39,54] do not report the underlying data coverage, control variables, effect sizes, or sensitivity analyses necessary for a reader to judge whether the patterns are genuinely platform-transcendent or artifacts of data collection. Since the survey's stated purpose is to consolidate a shared empirical baseline, the authors should add a dedicated evidence assessment, including a discussion of independent multiplatform studies (e.g., [177,294]) and any known null or contradictory results. Without this, the paper's central recommendation—that models be validated against these regularities—lacks a sufficiently documented foundation.

minor comments (8)

[Section 6, first paragraph] There is a typographical error in 'for example, in [39, 54]) the authors document'; the extra closing parenthesis after '[39, 54]' should be removed.
[References] References [206] and [207] are the same article (Swire-Thompson, DeGutis, and Lazer, 'Searching for the backfire effect', Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(3):286–299); one entry should be deleted and the in-text citations renumbered accordingly.
[Figure 1 and its caption] The caption contains 'Y ear' where 'Year' is intended, and the axis label appears similarly broken; these should be corrected.
[Reference [134]] The venue name is misspelled as 'Interntional Workshop on Quality of Service' and should be 'International Workshop on Quality of Service'.
[ACM Reference Format block] The reference format block lists '2018' and 'September 2018' while the manuscript is dated 2025; this should be updated to the actual submission information.
[Section 4.2, last paragraph] The phrasing 'In [169], the authors show that...' is awkward, and the cited work is an arXiv preprint; consider naming the authors in the sentence and, if possible, citing a published version.
[Acknowledgment] The sentence thanking 'the Hypnotoad' is not appropriate for a formal journal publication and should be removed or replaced.
[Section 5, final paragraph] The citation style 'the framework by [158]' is inconsistent with the rest of the text and should be converted to an author–year or narrative citation for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the survey synthesizes external empirical literature, and its self-citations are evidence rather than premises that reduce the conclusions to the inputs.

full rationale

This is a survey, not a derivation chain with fitted parameters or equations that could collapse into their own inputs. The central claims—field fragmentation, limited model validation, and the need for empirically anchored, cross-platform models—are argued from a broad literature, not from quantities defined in the paper itself. Section 6 leans on [39] and [54] for cross-platform regularities (toxicity with thread depth, linguistic simplification over time), and these are self-citations with substantial author overlap (Di Marco, Bonetti, Sangiorgio, Cinelli, Quattrociocchi). However, the cited works are independent published empirical studies (Nature and PNAS) with externally falsifiable results; the survey does not redefine those regularities, fit them, or rename its own assumptions as predictions. The interpretive sentence that algorithms 'may not create conversational dysfunction' and 'often expose and amplify human behavior' goes beyond what the survey itself verifies, but that is an evidential-strength concern, not circularity. Section 7 explicitly acknowledges that platform architecture is hard to disentangle from endogenous dynamics, so the paper does not hide the gap. No step in the paper reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a survey and introduces no new parameters, entities, or derivations. Its only implicit assumption is that the cited literature is faithfully represented.

assumptions (1)

domain assumption The surveyed literature is accurately summarized and the cited findings are valid.
The survey's synthesis and its call for empirical validation rest on the assumption that the empirical patterns described (e.g., attention concentration, echo chambers, coordinated behavior) are real and correctly attributed to the cited studies. If key findings were misrepresented, the survey's baseline would be flawed.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Patterns, Models, and Challenges in Online Social Media: A Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3OV7OG24

@misc{pith2026250713379,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Patterns, Models, and Challenges in Online Social Media: A Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3OV7OG24}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13379}
}

read the original abstract

The rise of digital platforms has enabled the large scale observation of individual and collective behavior through high resolution interaction data. This development has opened new analytical pathways for investigating how information circulates, how opinions evolve, and how coordination emerges in online environments. Yet despite a growing body of research, the field remains fragmented and marked by methodological heterogeneity, limited model validation, and weak integration across domains. This survey offers a systematic synthesis of empirical findings and formal models. We examine platform-level regularities, assess the methodological architectures that generate them, and evaluate the extent to which current modeling frameworks account for observed dynamics. The goal is to consolidate a shared empirical baseline and clarify the structural constraints that shape inference in this domain, laying the groundwork for more robust, comparable, and actionable analyses of online social systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13379 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Fraction of papers published on arXiv in cs.CY, cs.SI, and physics.soc-ph — three key categories in computational social science [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking, Group Decision Making and Beyond 2. Distorted Polarization and Vulnerability
physics.soc-ph 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

In a zero-temperature Ising-like model of opinion dynamics, a single well-placed local field, or two opposed fields at the right sites, can override the random spontaneous consensus and force a predetermined majority.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

297 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[39]

Persistent interaction patterns across social media platforms and over time.Nature, 628(8008):582–589, March 2024

Michele Avalle, Niccolò Di Marco, Gabriele Etta, Emanuele Sangiorgio, Shayan Alipour, Anita Bonetti, Lorenzo Alvisi, Antonio Scala, Andrea Baronchelli, Matteo Cinelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Persistent interaction patterns across social media platforms and over time.Nature, 628(8008):582–589, March 2024

2024
[54]

Patterns of linguistic simplification on social media platforms over time.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(50), December 2024

Niccolò Di Marco, Edoardo Loru, Anita Bonetti, Alessandra Olga Grazia Serra, Matteo Cinelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Patterns of linguistic simplification on social media platforms over time.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(50), December 2024

2024
[206]

Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(3):286–299, September 2020

Briony Swire-Thompson, Joseph DeGutis, and David Lazer. Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(3):286–299, September 2020

2020
[207]

Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 9(3):286–299, 2020

Briony Swire-Thompson, Joseph DeGutis, and David Lazer. Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 9(3):286–299, 2020

2020
[1]

The spreading of misinformation online.Proceedings of the national academy of Sciences, 113(3):554–559, 2016

Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H Eugene Stanley, and Walter Quattrociocchi. The spreading of misinformation online.Proceedings of the national academy of Sciences, 113(3):554–559, 2016

2016
[2]

The spread of true and false news online.science, 359(6380):1146–1151, 2018

Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. The spread of true and false news online.science, 359(6380):1146–1151, 2018

2018
[3]

Anatomy of news consumption on facebook.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(12):3035–3039, 2017

Ana Lucía Schmidt, Fabiana Zollo, Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H Eugene Stanley, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Anatomy of news consumption on facebook.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(12):3035–3039, 2017

2017
[4]

News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks.Social media+ society, 1(2):2056305115610141, 2015

Anna Sophie Kümpel, Veronika Karnowski, and Till Keyling. News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks.Social media+ society, 1(2):2056305115610141, 2015

2015

Show all 297 references

[5]

Linking online news and social media

Manos Tsagkias, Maarten De Rijke, and Wouter Weerkamp. Linking online news and social media. InProceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 565–574, 2011

2011
[6]

The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.science, 329(5996):1194–1197, 2010

Damon Centola. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment.science, 329(5996):1194–1197, 2010

2010
[7]

Hidden resilience and adaptive dynamics of the global online hate ecology.Nature, 573(7773):261–265, 2019

Neil F Johnson, Rhys Leahy, N Johnson Restrepo, Nicholas Velásquez, Minzhang Zheng, Pedro Manrique, Prajwal Devkota, and Stefan Wuchty. Hidden resilience and adaptive dynamics of the global online hate ecology.Nature, 573(7773):261–265, 2019

2019
[8]

Social media recommendation based on people and tags

Ido Guy, Naama Zwerdling, Inbal Ronen, David Carmel, and Erel Uziel. Social media recommendation based on people and tags. InProceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 194–201, 2010

2010
[9]

A survey on assessment and ranking methodologies for user-generated content on the web.ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 48(3):1–49, 2015

Elaheh Momeni, Claire Cardie, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. A survey on assessment and ranking methodologies for user-generated content on the web.ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 48(3):1–49, 2015

2015
[10]

Yale University Press, 2018

Tarleton Gillespie.Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press, 2018

2018
[11]

Bail, Lisa P

Christopher A. Bail, Lisa P. Argyle, Taylor W. Brown, John P. Bumpus, Haohan Chen, M. B. Fallin Hunzaker, Jaemin Lee, Marcus Mann, Friedolin Merhout, and Alexander Volfovsky. Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization.Proceedings of the Nati...

2018
[12]

Joshua A Tucker, Andrew Guess, Pablo Barberá, Cristian Vaccari, Alexandra Siegel, Sergey Sanovich, Denis Stukal, and Brendan Nyhan. Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature.Political polarization, and political d...

2018
[13]

Data mining techniques in social media: A survey.Neurocomputing, 214:654–670, 2016

MohammadNoor Injadat, Fadi Salo, and Ali Bou Nassif. Data mining techniques in social media: A survey.Neurocomputing, 214:654–670, 2016

2016
[14]

Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption.Public opinion quarterly, 80(S1):298–320, 2016

Seth Flaxman, Sharad Goel, and Justin M Rao. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption.Public opinion quarterly, 80(S1):298–320, 2016

2016
[15]

Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 us presidential campaign.European Research Council, 9(3):4, 2018

Andrew Guess, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 us presidential campaign.European Research Council, 9(3):4, 2018

2016
[16]

Misunderstanding the harms of online misinformation

Ceren Budak, Brendan Nyhan, David M Rothschild, Emily Thorson, and Duncan J Watts. Misunderstanding the harms of online misinformation. Nature, 630(8015):45–53, 2024

2024
[17]

Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation.PloS one, 10(2):e0118093, 2015

Alessandro Bessi, Mauro Coletto, George Alexandru Davidescu, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Science vs conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of misinformation.PloS one, 10(2):e0118093, 2015

2015
[18]

The echo chamber effect on social media.Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 118(9):e2023301118, 2021

Matteo Cinelli, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Alessandro Galeazzi, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Michele Starnini. The echo chamber effect on social media.Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 118(9):e2023301118, 2021. Manuscript submitted to ACM Patterns, Models, an...

2021
[19]

Political discourse on social media: Echo chambers, gatekeepers, and the price of bipartisanship

Kiran Garimella, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis. Political discourse on social media: Echo chambers, gatekeepers, and the price of bipartisanship. InProceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference, pages 913–922, 2018

2018
[20]

Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber?Psychological science, 26(10):1531–1542, 2015

Pablo Barberá, John T Jost, Jonathan Nagler, Joshua A Tucker, and Richard Bonneau. Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber?Psychological science, 26(10):1531–1542, 2015

2015
[21]

Mapping social dynamics on facebook: The brexit debate.Social Networks, 50:6–16, 2017

Michela Del Vicario, Fabiana Zollo, Guido Caldarelli, Antonio Scala, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Mapping social dynamics on facebook: The brexit debate.Social Networks, 50:6–16, 2017

2017
[22]

The covid-19 social media infodemic.Scientific reports, 10(1):16598, 2020

Matteo Cinelli, Walter Quattrociocchi, Alessandro Galeazzi, Carlo Michele Valensise, Emanuele Brugnoli, Ana Lucia Schmidt, Paola Zola, Fabiana Zollo, and Antonio Scala. The covid-19 social media infodemic.Scientific reports, 10(1):16598, 2020

2020
[23]

Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews.Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 100(9):544, 2022

Israel Junior Borges Do Nascimento, Ana Beatriz Pizarro, Jussara M Almeida, Natasha Azzopardi-Muscat, Marcos André Gonçalves, Maria Björklund, and David Novillo-Ortiz. Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews.Bulletin of the World Health Organizatio...

2022
[24]

Determinants of infodemics during disease outbreaks: a systematic review

Javier Alvarez-Galvez, Victor Suarez-Lledo, and Antonio Rojas-Garcia. Determinants of infodemics during disease outbreaks: a systematic review. Frontiers in public health, 9:603603, 2021

2021
[25]

Effects of social media on mental health: A review.International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(3):125–131, 2017

Hilal Bashir and Shabir Ahmad Bhat. Effects of social media on mental health: A review.International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(3):125–131, 2017

2017
[26]

Online misinformation is linked to early covid-19 vaccination hesitancy and refusal.Scientific reports, 12(1):5966, 2022

Francesco Pierri, Brea L Perry, Matthew R DeVerna, Kai-Cheng Yang, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Menczer, and John Bryden. Online misinformation is linked to early covid-19 vaccination hesitancy and refusal.Scientific reports, 12(1):5966, 2022

2022
[27]

Vaccine misinformation and social media.The Lancet Digital Health, 1(6):e258–e259, 2019

Talha Burki. Vaccine misinformation and social media.The Lancet Digital Health, 1(6):e258–e259, 2019

2019
[28]

Przybylski, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, and Rogier A

Amy Orben, Andrew K. Przybylski, Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, and Rogier A. Kievit. Windows of developmental sensitivity to social media.Nature Communications, 13(1), March 2022

2022
[29]

J. A. Naslund, K. A. Aschbrenner, L. A. Marsch, and S. J. Bartels. The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 25(2):113–122, January 2016

2016
[30]

Social media and youth mental health.Current psychiatry reports, 26(1):1–8, 2024

Paul E Weigle and Reem MA Shafi. Social media and youth mental health.Current psychiatry reports, 26(1):1–8, 2024

2024
[31]

Christopher J Ferguson, Linda K Kaye, Dawn Branley-Bell, and Patrick Markey. There is no evidence that time spent on social media is correlated with adolescent mental health problems: Findings from a meta-analysis.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2024

2024
[32]

Mapping the global election landscape on social media in 2024.PloS one, 20(2):e0316271, 2025

Giulio Pecile, Niccolò Di Marco, Matteo Cinelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Mapping the global election landscape on social media in 2024.PloS one, 20(2):e0316271, 2025

2024
[33]

Political effects of the internet and social media.Annual review of economics, 12(1):415–438, 2020

Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, Maria Petrova, and Ruben Enikolopov. Political effects of the internet and social media.Annual review of economics, 12(1):415–438, 2020

2020
[34]

Social media and the elections.Science, 338(6106):472–473, 2012

Panagiotis T Metaxas and Eni Mustafaraj. Social media and the elections.Science, 338(6106):472–473, 2012

2012
[35]

Protecting elections from social media manipulation.Science, 365(6456):858–861, 2019

Sinan Aral and Dean Eckles. Protecting elections from social media manipulation.Science, 365(6456):858–861, 2019

2019
[36]

Social media for large studies of behavior.Science, 346(6213):1063–1064, 2014

Derek Ruths and Jürgen Pfeffer. Social media for large studies of behavior.Science, 346(6213):1063–1064, 2014

2014
[37]

Computational social science: Obstacles and opportunities.Science, 369(6507):1060–1062, 2020

David MJ Lazer, Alex Pentland, Duncan J Watts, Sinan Aral, Susan Athey, Noshir Contractor, Deen Freelon, Sandra Gonzalez-Bailon, Gary King, Helen Margetts, et al. Computational social science: Obstacles and opportunities.Science, 369(6507):1060–1062, 2020

2020
[38]

The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network.Scientific reports, 1(1):1–7, 2011

Sandra González-Bailón, Javier Borge-Holthoefer, Alejandro Rivero, and Yamir Moreno. The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network.Scientific reports, 1(1):1–7, 2011

2011
[40]

Measuring algorithmically infused societies.Nature, 595(7866):197–204, 2021

Claudia Wagner, Markus Strohmaier, Alexandra Olteanu, Emre Kıcıman, Noshir Contractor, and Tina Eliassi-Rad. Measuring algorithmically infused societies.Nature, 595(7866):197–204, 2021

2021
[41]

Computational social science.Science, 323(5915):721–723, 2009

David Lazer, Alex Pentland, Lada Adamic, Sinan Aral, Albert-László Barabási, Devon Brewer, Nicholas Christakis, Noshir Contractor, James Fowler, Myron Gutmann, et al. Computational social science.Science, 323(5915):721–723, 2009

2009
[42]

Conte, N

R. Conte, N. Gilbert, G. Bonelli, C. Cioffi-Revilla, G. Deffuant, J. Kertesz, V. Loreto, S. Moat, J. P. Nadal, A. Sanchez, A. Nowak, A. Flache, M. San Miguel, and D. Helbing. Manifesto of computational social science.The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1):325–346...

2012
[43]

A twenty-first century science.Nature, 445(7127):489–489, 2007

Duncan J Watts. A twenty-first century science.Nature, 445(7127):489–489, 2007

2007
[44]

Networked discontent: The anatomy of protest campaigns in social media.Social networks, 44:95–104, 2016

Sandra González-Bailón and Ning Wang. Networked discontent: The anatomy of protest campaigns in social media.Social networks, 44:95–104, 2016

2016
[45]

Self-reported willingness to share political news articles in online surveys correlates with actual sharing on twitter.Plos one, 15(2):e0228882, 2020

Mohsen Mosleh, Gordon Pennycook, and David G Rand. Self-reported willingness to share political news articles in online surveys correlates with actual sharing on twitter.Plos one, 15(2):e0228882, 2020

2020
[46]

Big questions for social media big data: Representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls

Zeynep Tufekci. Big questions for social media big data: Representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. InProceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, volume 8, pages 505–514, 2014

2014
[47]

Less fragmented but highly centralized: a bibliometric analysis of research in computational social science.Social Science Computer Review, 41(3):946–966, 2023

Xiaohui Wang, Yunya Song, and Youzhen Su. Less fragmented but highly centralized: a bibliometric analysis of research in computational social science.Social Science Computer Review, 41(3):946–966, 2023

2023
[48]

The emergence of computational social science: Intellectual integration or persistent fragmentation? 2024

Juho Pääkkönen, Matti Nelimarkka, and Samuli Reijula. The emergence of computational social science: Intellectual integration or persistent fragmentation? 2024. Manuscript submitted to ACM 18 Di Marco et al

2024
[49]

How social media reduces mass political polarization

Barberá Pablo. How social media reduces mass political polarization. evidence from germany, spain, and the us.Job Market Paper, 2014

2014
[50]

The hostile audience: The effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect.American Journal of Political Science, 61(1):5–20, 2017

Yphtach Lelkes, Gaurav Sood, and Shanto Iyengar. The hostile audience: The effect of access to broadband internet on partisan affect.American Journal of Political Science, 61(1):5–20, 2017

2017
[51]

Polarization and fake news: Early warning of potential misinformation targets.ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 13(2):1–22, 2019

Michela Del Vicario, Walter Quattrociocchi, Antonio Scala, and Fabiana Zollo. Polarization and fake news: Early warning of potential misinformation targets.ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 13(2):1–22, 2019

2019
[52]

Computational research in the post-api age.Political Communication, 35(4):665–668, 2018

Deen Freelon. Computational research in the post-api age.Political Communication, 35(4):665–668, 2018

2018
[53]

Misinformation, disinformation, and online propaganda.Social media and democracy: The state of the field, prospects for reform, 10:10–33, 2020

Andrew M Guess and Benjamin A Lyons. Misinformation, disinformation, and online propaganda.Social media and democracy: The state of the field, prospects for reform, 10:10–33, 2020

2020
[55]

Evaluating social work education: A review of outcomes, measures, research designs and practicalities.Social Work Education, 30(02):122–140, 2011

John Carpenter. Evaluating social work education: A review of outcomes, measures, research designs and practicalities.Social Work Education, 30(02):122–140, 2011

2011
[56]

Do some interventions work better than others? a review of comparative social work experiments.Social work research, 28(2):71–81, 2004

William J Reid, Bonnie Davis Kenaley, and Julanne Colvin. Do some interventions work better than others? a review of comparative social work experiments.Social work research, 28(2):71–81, 2004

2004
[57]

Empirical research on social work supervision: The state of the art (1970-1995).Journal of Social Service Research, 23(2):39–54, 1997

Ming-Sum Tsui. Empirical research on social work supervision: The state of the art (1970-1995).Journal of Social Service Research, 23(2):39–54, 1997

1970
[58]

Obstacles to and limitations of social experiments: 15 false alarms.Abt thought leadership paper, Abt Associates, 2012

Stephen H Bell and Laura R Peck. Obstacles to and limitations of social experiments: 15 false alarms.Abt thought leadership paper, Abt Associates, 2012

2012
[59]

Button, John P

Katherine S. Button, John P. A. Ioannidis, Claire Mokrysz, Brian A. Nosek, Jonathan Flint, Emma S. J. Robinson, and Marcus R. Munafò. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(5):365–376, April 2013

2013
[60]

Makel, Jonathan A

Matthew C. Makel, Jonathan A. Plucker, and Boyd Hegarty. Replications in psychology research: How often do they really occur?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6):537–542, November 2012

2012
[61]

Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation.Personality and Individual Differences, 7(3):385–400, January 1986

Adrian Furnham. Response bias, social desirability and dissimulation.Personality and Individual Differences, 7(3):385–400, January 1986

1986
[62]

Robert Rosenman, Vidhura Tennekoon, and Laura G. Hill. Measuring bias in self-reported data.International Journal of Behavioural and Healthcare Research, 2(4):320, 2011

2011
[63]

Pankowska, and Cameron Brick

Katharina Koller, Paulina K. Pankowska, and Cameron Brick. Identifying bias in self-reported pro-environmental behavior.Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 4:100087, 2023

2023
[64]

Platform enclosure of human behavior and its measurement: Using behavioral trace data against platform episteme.New Media & Society, 23(9):2650–2667, 2021

Angela Xiao Wu and Harsh Taneja. Platform enclosure of human behavior and its measurement: Using behavioral trace data against platform episteme.New Media & Society, 23(9):2650–2667, 2021

2021
[65]

Like, comment, and share on facebook: How each behavior differs from the other.Public relations review, 43(2):441–449, 2017

Cheonsoo Kim and Sung-Un Yang. Like, comment, and share on facebook: How each behavior differs from the other.Public relations review, 43(2):441–449, 2017

2017
[66]

Impact of content characteristics and emotion on behavioral engagement in social media: literature review and research agenda.Electronic Commerce Research, 21:329–345, 2021

Melanie Schreiner, Thomas Fischer, and Rene Riedl. Impact of content characteristics and emotion on behavioral engagement in social media: literature review and research agenda.Electronic Commerce Research, 21:329–345, 2021

2021
[67]

Beyond the data deluge.Science, 323(5919):1297–1298, March 2009

Gordon Bell, Tony Hey, and Alex Szalay. Beyond the data deluge.Science, 323(5919):1297–1298, March 2009

2009
[68]

Parry, Brittany I

Douglas A. Parry, Brittany I. Davidson, Craig J. R. Sewall, Jacob T. Fisher, Hannah Mieczkowski, and Daniel S. Quintana. A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrepancies between logged and self-reported digital media use.Nature Human Behaviour, 5(11):1535–1547, May 2021

2021
[69]

Leaving traces behind: Using social media digital trace data to study adolescent wellbeing.Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 10:100281, 2023

Mubashir Sultan, Christin Scholz, and Wouter van den Bos. Leaving traces behind: Using social media digital trace data to study adolescent wellbeing.Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 10:100281, 2023

2023
[70]

Understanding user migration patterns in social media

Shamanth Kumar, Reza Zafarani, and Huan Liu. Understanding user migration patterns in social media. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 25, pages 1204–1209, 2011

2011
[71]

A survey of data mining techniques for social media analysis.Journal of Data Mining & Digital Humanities, 2014, 2014

Mariam Adedoyin-Olowe, Mohamed Medhat Gaber, and Frederic Stahl. A survey of data mining techniques for social media analysis.Journal of Data Mining & Digital Humanities, 2014, 2014

2014
[72]

A survey on information diffusion in online social networks: Models and methods.Information, 8(4):118, 2017

Mei Li, Xiang Wang, Kai Gao, and Shanshan Zhang. A survey on information diffusion in online social networks: Models and methods.Information, 8(4):118, 2017

2017
[73]

Information diffusion in online social networks: A survey.ACM Sigmod Record, 42(2):17–28, 2013

Adrien Guille, Hakim Hacid, Cecile Favre, and Djamel A Zighed. Information diffusion in online social networks: A survey.ACM Sigmod Record, 42(2):17–28, 2013

2013
[74]

Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution

Lars Backstrom, Dan Huttenlocher, Jon Kleinberg, and Xiangyang Lan. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. InProceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 44–54, 2006

2006
[75]

Echo chambers: Emotional contagion and group polarization on facebook.Scientific reports, 6(1):37825, 2016

Michela Del Vicario, Gianna Vivaldo, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Echo chambers: Emotional contagion and group polarization on facebook.Scientific reports, 6(1):37825, 2016

2016
[76]

Opinion amplification causes extreme polarization in social networks.Scientific Reports, 12(1):18131, 2022

Soo Ling Lim and Peter J Bentley. Opinion amplification causes extreme polarization in social networks.Scientific Reports, 12(1):18131, 2022

2022
[77]

Algorithmic amplification of politics on twitter

Ferenc Huszár, Sofia Ira Ktena, Conor O’Brien, Luca Belli, Andrew Schlaikjer, and Moritz Hardt. Algorithmic amplification of politics on twitter. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 119(1):e2025334119, 2022

2022
[78]

Social media data archives in an api-driven world.Archival Science, 20(2):105–123, 2020

Amelia Acker and Adam Kreisberg. Social media data archives in an api-driven world.Archival Science, 20(2):105–123, 2020

2020
[79]

Neutrality or contextuality.Social Informatics, 2025

Kyra Milan Abrams and Madelyn Rose Sanfilippo. Neutrality or contextuality.Social Informatics, 2025

2025
[80]

Beyond neutrality: Conceptualizing platform values.Communication Theory, 32(2):201–222, 2022

Blake Hallinan, Rebecca Scharlach, and Limor Shifman. Beyond neutrality: Conceptualizing platform values.Communication Theory, 32(2):201–222, 2022. Manuscript submitted to ACM Patterns, Models, and Challenges in Online Social Media: A Survey 19

2022
[81]

Behavior analysis in social media.IEEE Intelligent systems, 29(4):1–4, 2014

Reza Zafarani and Huan Liu. Behavior analysis in social media.IEEE Intelligent systems, 29(4):1–4, 2014

2014
[82]

Classifying political orientation on twitter: It’s not easy! InProceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, volume 7, pages 91–99, 2013

Raviv Cohen and Derek Ruths. Classifying political orientation on twitter: It’s not easy! InProceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, volume 7, pages 91–99, 2013

2013
[83]

Geolocation prediction in twitter using social networks: A critical analysis and review of current practice

David Jurgens, Tyler Finethy, James McCorriston, Yi Xu, and Derek Ruths. Geolocation prediction in twitter using social networks: A critical analysis and review of current practice. InProceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, volume 9, pages 188...

2015
[84]

Influence of fake news in twitter during the 2016 us presidential election.Nature communications, 10(1):7, 2019

Alexandre Bovet and Hernán A Makse. Influence of fake news in twitter during the 2016 us presidential election.Nature communications, 10(1):7, 2019

2016
[85]

Political polarization of news media and influencers on twitter in the 2016 and 2020 us presidential elections

James Flamino, Alessandro Galeazzi, Stuart Feldman, Michael W Macy, Brendan Cross, Zhenkun Zhou, Matteo Serafino, Alexandre Bovet, Hernán A Makse, and Boleslaw K Szymanski. Political polarization of news media and influencers on twitter in the 2016 and 2020 us presidential ele...

2016
[86]

Virality prediction and community structure in social networks.Scientific reports, 3(1):2522, 2013

Lilian Weng, Filippo Menczer, and Yong-Yeol Ahn. Virality prediction and community structure in social networks.Scientific reports, 3(1):2522, 2013

2013
[87]

The online competition between pro-and anti-vaccination views.Nature, 582(7811):230–233, 2020

Neil F Johnson, Nicolas Velásquez, Nicholas Johnson Restrepo, Rhys Leahy, Nicholas Gabriel, Sara El Oud, Minzhang Zheng, Pedro Manrique, Stefan Wuchty, and Yonatan Lupu. The online competition between pro-and anti-vaccination views.Nature, 582(7811):230–233, 2020

2020
[88]

Hyperlink analyses of the world wide web: A review.Journal of computer-mediated communication, 8(4):JCMC843, 2003

Han Woo Park and Mike Thelwall. Hyperlink analyses of the world wide web: A review.Journal of computer-mediated communication, 8(4):JCMC843, 2003

2003
[89]

Facebook’s news feed algorithm and the 2020 us election.Social Media+ Society, 9(3):20563051231196898, 2023

Jack Bandy and Nicholas Diakopoulos. Facebook’s news feed algorithm and the 2020 us election.Social Media+ Society, 9(3):20563051231196898, 2023

2020
[90]

The ineffectiveness of fact-checking labels on news memes and articles.Mass Communication and Society, 23(5):682–704, 2020

Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch, Mike Schmierbach, Alyssa Appelman, and Michael P Boyle. The ineffectiveness of fact-checking labels on news memes and articles.Mass Communication and Society, 23(5):682–704, 2020

2020
[91]

Fact-checker warning labels are effective even for those who distrust fact-checkers.Nature Human Behaviour, 8(10):1957–1967, 2024

Cameron Martel and David G Rand. Fact-checker warning labels are effective even for those who distrust fact-checkers.Nature Human Behaviour, 8(10):1957–1967, 2024

1957
[92]

The rise of the social algorithm.Science, 348(6239):1090–1091, 2015

David Lazer. The rise of the social algorithm.Science, 348(6239):1090–1091, 2015

2015
[93]

Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking.European review of social psychology, 32(2):348–384, 2021

Stephan Lewandowsky and Sander Van Der Linden. Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking.European review of social psychology, 32(2):348–384, 2021

2021
[94]

Field experiments on social media.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(1):69–75, 2022

Mohsen Mosleh, Gordon Pennycook, and David G Rand. Field experiments on social media.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 31(1):69–75, 2022

2022
[95]

Auditing algorithmic bias on twitter

Nathan Bartley, Andres Abeliuk, Emilio Ferrara, and Kristina Lerman. Auditing algorithmic bias on twitter. InProceedings of the 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021, pages 65–73, 2021

2021
[96]

Hong Shen, Alicia DeVos, Motahhare Eslami, and Kenneth Holstein. Everyday algorithm auditing: Understanding the power of everyday users in surfacing harmful algorithmic behaviors.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2):1–29, 2021

2021
[97]

Problematic machine behavior: A systematic literature review of algorithm audits.Proceedings of the acm on human-computer interaction, 5(CSCW1):1–34, 2021

Jack Bandy. Problematic machine behavior: A systematic literature review of algorithm audits.Proceedings of the acm on human-computer interaction, 5(CSCW1):1–34, 2021

2021
[98]

John Wiley & Sons, 2011

Peter R Scott and J Mike Jacka.Auditing social media: A governance and risk guide. John Wiley & Sons, 2011

2011
[99]

Who does what on the web: A large-scale study of browsing behavior

Sharad Goel, Jake Hofman, and M Sirer. Who does what on the web: A large-scale study of browsing behavior. InProceedings of the International AAAI Conference on web and Social Media, volume 6, pages 130–137, 2012

2012
[100]

A characterization of online browsing behavior

Ravi Kumar and Andrew Tomkins. A characterization of online browsing behavior. InProceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, pages 561–570, 2010

2010
[101]

A model of web site browsing behavior estimated on clickstream data.Journal of marketing research, 40(3):249–267, 2003

Randolph E Bucklin and Catarina Sismeiro. A model of web site browsing behavior estimated on clickstream data.Journal of marketing research, 40(3):249–267, 2003

2003
[102]

Benefits of browsing? the prevalence, nature, and effects of profile consumption behavior in social network sites.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(2):72–89, 2018

Miriam J Metzger, Christo Wilson, and Ben Y Zhao. Benefits of browsing? the prevalence, nature, and effects of profile consumption behavior in social network sites.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(2):72–89, 2018

2018
[103]

An agent-based model of urgent diffusion in social media.Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(2):1, 2015

William Rand, Jeffrey Herrmann, Brandon Schein, and Neža Vodopivec. An agent-based model of urgent diffusion in social media.Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(2):1, 2015

2015
[104]

Why do people use social media? agent-based simulation and population dynamics analysis of the evolution of cooperation in social media

Fujio Toriumi, Hitoshi Yamamoto, and Isamu Okada. Why do people use social media? agent-based simulation and population dynamics analysis of the evolution of cooperation in social media. In2012 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conferences on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Te...

2012
[105]

Agent-based modelling of excitation propagation in social media groups.Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 27(4):373–388, 2015

Darius Plikynas, Aistis Raudys, and Sarunas Raudys. Agent-based modelling of excitation propagation in social media groups.Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 27(4):373–388, 2015

2015
[106]

An agent based model of spread of competing rumors through online interactions on social media

Chaitanya Kaligotla, Enver Yücesan, and Stephen E Chick. An agent based model of spread of competing rumors through online interactions on social media. In2015 winter simulation conference (WSC), pages 3985–3996. IEEE, 2015

2015
[107]

Understanding the complex links between social media and health behaviour.bmj, 385, 2024

Fabiana Zollo, Andrea Baronchelli, Cornelia Betsch, Marco Delmastro, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Understanding the complex links between social media and health behaviour.bmj, 385, 2024

2024
[108]

Independence by permission.Science, 381(6656):388–391, 2023

Michael W Wagner. Independence by permission.Science, 381(6656):388–391, 2023

2023
[109]

Inder M Verma. Editorial expression of concern: Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(29):10779–10779, 2014. Manuscript submitted to ACM 20 Di Marco et al

2014
[110]

The business of personal data: Google, facebook, and privacy issues in the eu and the usa.International Data Privacy Law, 7(1):36–47, 2017

Asunción Esteve. The business of personal data: Google, facebook, and privacy issues in the eu and the usa.International Data Privacy Law, 7(1):36–47, 2017

2017
[111]

Empirical validation of agent-based models: A critical survey

Giorgio Fagiolo, Paul Windrum, and Alessio Moneta. Empirical validation of agent-based models: A critical survey. Technical report, LEM Working Paper Series, 2006

2006
[112]

Potentialities and limitations of agent-based simulations.Revue française de sociologie, 55(4):653–688, 2014

Gianluca Manzo and Toby Matthews. Potentialities and limitations of agent-based simulations.Revue française de sociologie, 55(4):653–688, 2014

2014
[113]

Empirical validation of agent-based models: Alternatives and prospects.Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 10(2):8, 2007

Paul Windrum, Giorgio Fagiolo, and Alessio Moneta. Empirical validation of agent-based models: Alternatives and prospects.Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 10(2):8, 2007

2007
[114]

Social media big data analytics: A survey.Computers in Human behavior, 101:417–428, 2019

Norjihan Abdul Ghani, Suraya Hamid, Ibrahim Abaker Targio Hashem, and Ejaz Ahmed. Social media big data analytics: A survey.Computers in Human behavior, 101:417–428, 2019

2019
[115]

Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks.Nature physics, 6(11):888–893, 2010

Maksim Kitsak, Lazaros K Gallos, Shlomo Havlin, Fredrik Liljeros, Lev Muchnik, H Eugene Stanley, and Hernán A Makse. Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks.Nature physics, 6(11):888–893, 2010

2010
[116]

Facebook experiment boosts us voter turnout.Nature, 12, 2012

Zoe Corbyn. Facebook experiment boosts us voter turnout.Nature, 12, 2012

2012
[117]

The attention economy.Scientific American, 323(6):54–61, 2020

Filippo Menczer and Thomas Hills. The attention economy.Scientific American, 323(6):54–61, 2020

2020
[118]

The production of information in the attention economy.Scientific reports, 5(1):9452, 2015

Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. The production of information in the attention economy.Scientific reports, 5(1):9452, 2015

2015
[119]

The attention economy and the net.First Monday, 1997

Michael H Goldhaber. The attention economy and the net.First Monday, 1997

1997
[120]

Searching for superspreaders of information in real-world social media.Scientific reports, 4(1):5547, 2014

Sen Pei, Lev Muchnik, José S Andrade, Jr, Zhiming Zheng, and Hernán A Makse. Searching for superspreaders of information in real-world social media.Scientific reports, 4(1):5547, 2014

2014
[121]

Minimizing the spread of misinformation in online social networks: A survey.Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 186:103094, 2021

Ahmad Zareie and Rizos Sakellariou. Minimizing the spread of misinformation in online social networks: A survey.Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 186:103094, 2021

2021
[122]

Fragmented social media: a look into selective exposure to political news

Jisun An, Daniele Quercia, and Jon Crowcroft. Fragmented social media: a look into selective exposure to political news. InProceedings of the 22nd international conference on world wide web, pages 51–52, 2013

2013
[123]

Davenport and John C

Thomas H. Davenport and John C. Beck. The attention economy.Ubiquity, 2001(May):1, May 2001

2001
[124]

Limited attention as a scarce resource in information-rich economies.The Economic Journal, 118(532):1596–1620, September 2008

Josef Falkinger. Limited attention as a scarce resource in information-rich economies.The Economic Journal, 118(532):1596–1620, September 2008

2008
[125]

Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media.Business information review, 34(3):150–160, 2017

Dominic Spohr. Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media.Business information review, 34(3):150–160, 2017

2017
[126]

Competition for attention in the information (overload) age.The RAND Journal of Economics, 43(1):1–25, 2012

Simon P Anderson and André De Palma. Competition for attention in the information (overload) age.The RAND Journal of Economics, 43(1):1–25, 2012

2012
[127]

Russell Neuman, and Olivia Curry

Eszter Hargittai, W. Russell Neuman, and Olivia Curry. Taming the information tide: Perceptions of information overload in the american home. The Information Society, 28(3):161–173, May 2012

2012
[128]

Information overload: An introduction, June 2020

David Bawden and Lyn Robinson. Information overload: An introduction, June 2020

2020
[129]

Selective exposure shapes the facebook news diet.PloS one, 15(3):e0229129, 2020

Matteo Cinelli, Emanuele Brugnoli, Ana Lucia Schmidt, Fabiana Zollo, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Antonio Scala. Selective exposure shapes the facebook news diet.PloS one, 15(3):e0229129, 2020

2020
[130]

The impact of e-mail on work-life balance.Aslib Proceedings, 64(2):154–177, March 2012

Aaron David Waller and Gillian Ragsdell. The impact of e-mail on work-life balance.Aslib Proceedings, 64(2):154–177, March 2012

2012
[131]

not this one

Zeynep Tufekci. “not this one”: Social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism.American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7):848–870, March 2013

2013
[132]

Bhargava and Manuel Velasquez

Vikram R. Bhargava and Manuel Velasquez. Ethics of the attention economy: The problem of social media addiction.Business Ethics Quarterly, 31(3):321–359, October 2020

2020
[133]

Users polarization on facebook and youtube.PloS one, 11(8):e0159641, 2016

Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Michela Del Vicario, Michelangelo Puliga, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, Brian Uzzi, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Users polarization on facebook and youtube.PloS one, 11(8):e0159641, 2016

2016
[134]

Statistics and social network of youtube videos

Xu Cheng, Cameron Dale, and Jiangchuan Liu. Statistics and social network of youtube videos. In2008 16th Interntional Workshop on Quality of Service, pages 229–238. IEEE, 2008

2008
[135]

Followers do not dictate the virality of news outlets on social media.PNAS Nexus, 3(7), June 2024

Emanuele Sangiorgio, Matteo Cinelli, Roy Cerqueti, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Followers do not dictate the virality of news outlets on social media.PNAS Nexus, 3(7), June 2024

2024
[136]

Social information processing in news aggregation.IEEE internet computing, 11(6):16–28, 2007

Kristina Lerman. Social information processing in news aggregation.IEEE internet computing, 11(6):16–28, 2007

2007
[137]

Characterizing engagement dynamics across topics on facebook.PLOS ONE, 18(6):e0286150, June 2023

Gabriele Etta, Emanuele Sangiorgio, Niccolò Di Marco, Michele Avalle, Antonio Scala, Matteo Cinelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Characterizing engagement dynamics across topics on facebook.PLOS ONE, 18(6):e0286150, June 2023

2023
[138]

Robertson, Nicolas Pröllochs, Kaoru Schwarzenegger, Philip Pärnamets, Jay J

Claire E. Robertson, Nicolas Pröllochs, Kaoru Schwarzenegger, Philip Pärnamets, Jay J. Van Bavel, and Stefan Feuerriegel. Negativity drives online news consumption.Nature Human Behaviour, 7(5):812–822, March 2023

2023
[139]

How does extreme weather impact the climate change discourse? insights from the twitter discussion on hurricanes.Plos Climate, 2(11):e0000277, 2023

Maddalena Torricelli, Max Falkenberg, Alessandro Galeazzi, Fabiana Zollo, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Andrea Baronchelli. How does extreme weather impact the climate change discourse? insights from the twitter discussion on hurricanes.Plos Climate, 2(11):e0000277, 2023

2023
[140]

Assessing the risks of ‘infodemics’ in response to covid-19 epidemics.Nature human behaviour, 4(12):1285–1293, 2020

Riccardo Gallotti, Francesco Valle, Nicola Castaldo, Pierluigi Sacco, and Manlio De Domenico. Assessing the risks of ‘infodemics’ in response to covid-19 epidemics.Nature human behaviour, 4(12):1285–1293, 2020

2020
[141]

Viral misinformation: The role of homophily and polarization

Alessandro Bessi, Fabio Petroni, Michela Del Vicario, Fabiana Zollo, Aris Anagnostopoulos, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattro- ciocchi. Viral misinformation: The role of homophily and polarization. InProceedings of the 24th international conference on World Wi...

2015
[142]

Combining interventions to reduce the spread of viral misinformation.Nature Human Behaviour, 6(10):1372–1380, 2022

Joseph B Bak-Coleman, Ian Kennedy, Morgan Wack, Andrew Beers, Joseph S Schafer, Emma S Spiro, Kate Starbird, and Jevin D West. Combining interventions to reduce the spread of viral misinformation.Nature Human Behaviour, 6(10):1372–1380, 2022

2022
[143]

They liked and shared: Effects of social media virality metrics on perceptions of message influence and behavioral intentions

Ji Won Kim. They liked and shared: Effects of social media virality metrics on perceptions of message influence and behavioral intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 84:153–161, 2018

2018
[144]

Effective messaging on social media: What makes online content go viral? InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, pages 2957–2966, 2022

Maryam Mousavi, Hasan Davulcu, Mohsen Ahmadi, Robert Axelrod, Richard Davis, and Scott Atran. Effective messaging on social media: What makes online content go viral? InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022, pages 2957–2966, 2022

2022
[145]

Viral video ads: Emotional triggers and social media virality.Psychology & marketing, 35(10):715– 726, 2018

Angeliki Nikolinakou and Karen Whitehill King. Viral video ads: Emotional triggers and social media virality.Psychology & marketing, 35(10):715– 726, 2018

2018
[146]

Analysing the effect of recommendation algorithms on the spread of misinformation

Miriam Fernandez, Alejandro Bellogín, and Iván Cantador. Analysing the effect of recommendation algorithms on the spread of misinformation. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Web Science Conference, pages 159–169, 2024

2024
[147]

Exploring text virality in social networks

Marco Guerini, Carlo Strapparava, and Gozde Ozbal. Exploring text virality in social networks. Inproceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, volume 5, pages 506–509, 2011

2011
[148]

The importance of interactions between content characteristics and creator characteristics for studying virality in social media.Information Systems Research, 31(2):576–588, 2020

Yue Han, Theodoros Lappas, and Gaurav Sabnis. The importance of interactions between content characteristics and creator characteristics for studying virality in social media.Information Systems Research, 31(2):576–588, 2020

2020
[149]

Users volatility on reddit and voat.IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2024

Niccolò Di Marco, Matteo Cinelli, Shayan Alipour, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Users volatility on reddit and voat.IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2024

2024
[150]

Evaluating the effect of viral posts on social media engagement.Scientific Reports, 15(1):639, 2025

Emanuele Sangiorgio, Niccolò Di Marco, Gabriele Etta, Matteo Cinelli, Roy Cerqueti, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Evaluating the effect of viral posts on social media engagement.Scientific Reports, 15(1):639, 2025

2025
[151]

Emotions and information diffusion in social media—sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior.Journal of management information systems, 29(4):217–248, 2013

Stefan Stieglitz and Linh Dang-Xuan. Emotions and information diffusion in social media—sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior.Journal of management information systems, 29(4):217–248, 2013

2013
[152]

How media competition fuels the spread of misinformation.Science Advances, 11(25), June 2025

Arash Amini, Yigit Ege Bayiz, Eun-Ju Lee, Zeynep Somer-Topcu, Radu Marculescu, and Ufuk Topcu. How media competition fuels the spread of misinformation.Science Advances, 11(25), June 2025

2025
[153]

The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction.Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1):13–29, 2022

Ullrich KH Ecker, Stephan Lewandowsky, John Cook, Philipp Schmid, Lisa K Fazio, Nadia Brashier, Panayiota Kendeou, Emily K Vraga, and Michelle A Amazeen. The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction.Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1):13–29, 2022

2022
[154]

Infodemics: A new challenge for public health.Cell, 184(25):6010–6014, 2021

Sylvie C Briand, Matteo Cinelli, Tim Nguyen, Rosamund Lewis, Dimitri Prybylski, Carlo M Valensise, Vittoria Colizza, Alberto Eugenio Tozzi, Nicola Perra, Andrea Baronchelli, et al. Infodemics: A new challenge for public health.Cell, 184(25):6010–6014, 2021

2021
[155]

The agenda-setting function of mass media.Public opinion quarterly, 36(2):176–187, 1972

Maxwell E McCombs and Donald L Shaw. The agenda-setting function of mass media.Public opinion quarterly, 36(2):176–187, 1972

1972
[156]

Social media and political agenda setting.Political communication, 39(1):39–60, 2022

Fabrizio Gilardi, Theresa Gessler, Maël Kubli, and Stefan Müller. Social media and political agenda setting.Political communication, 39(1):39–60, 2022

2022
[157]

Social politics: Agenda setting and political communication on social media

Xinxin Yang, Bo-Chiuan Chen, Mrinmoy Maity, and Emilio Ferrara. Social politics: Agenda setting and political communication on social media. In Social Informatics: 8th International Conference, SocInfo 2016, Bellevue, W A, USA, November 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part I 8, page...

2016
[158]

Opinion dynamics on interacting networks: media competition and social influence

Walter Quattrociocchi, Guido Caldarelli, and Antonio Scala. Opinion dynamics on interacting networks: media competition and social influence. Scientific reports, 4(1):4938, 2014

2014
[159]

The agenda-setting function of social media

Rachel M Kim and Ashton Anderson. The agenda-setting function of social media. InProceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, pages 601–613, 2025

2025
[160]

Is there an elite hold? traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks.Journal of computer-mediated communication, 14(3):682–707, 2009

Sharon Meraz. Is there an elite hold? traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks.Journal of computer-mediated communication, 14(3):682–707, 2009

2009
[161]

Social media popularity prediction: A multiple feature fusion approach with deep neural networks

Keyan Ding, Ronggang Wang, and Shiqi Wang. Social media popularity prediction: A multiple feature fusion approach with deep neural networks. InProceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 2682–2686, 2019

2019
[162]

Exploring trends and patterns of popularity stage evolution in social media.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 50(10):3817–3827, 2018

Qingchao Kong, Wenji Mao, Guandan Chen, and Daniel Zeng. Exploring trends and patterns of popularity stage evolution in social media.IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 50(10):3817–3827, 2018

2018
[163]

Conceptualising and measuring social media engagement: A systematic literature review.Italian Journal of Marketing, 2021(3):267–292, 2021

Mariapina Trunfio and Simona Rossi. Conceptualising and measuring social media engagement: A systematic literature review.Italian Journal of Marketing, 2021(3):267–292, 2021

2021
[164]

Poprank: Ranking pages’ impact and users’ engagement on facebook.PloS one, 14(1):e0211038, 2019

Andrea Zaccaria, Michela Del Vicario, Walter Quattrociocchi, Antonio Scala, and Luciano Pietronero. Poprank: Ranking pages’ impact and users’ engagement on facebook.PloS one, 14(1):e0211038, 2019

2019
[165]

Providing normative information increases intentions to accept a covid-19 vaccine.Nature Communications, 14(1):126, 2023

Alex Moehring, Avinash Collis, Kiran Garimella, M Amin Rahimian, Sinan Aral, and Dean Eckles. Providing normative information increases intentions to accept a covid-19 vaccine.Nature Communications, 14(1):126, 2023

2023
[166]

Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on facebook.Science, 348(6239):1130–1132, 2015

Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, and Lada A Adamic. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on facebook.Science, 348(6239):1130–1132, 2015

2015
[167]

Lilian Weng, Márton Karsai, Nicola Perra, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. Attention on weak ties in social and communication networks.Complex spreading phenomena in social systems: Influence and contagion in real-world social networks, pages 213–228, 2018

2018
[168]

Modeling users’ activity on twitter networks: Validation of dunbar’s number.PloS one, 6(8):e22656, 2011

Bruno Gonçalves, Nicola Perra, and Alessandro Vespignani. Modeling users’ activity on twitter networks: Validation of dunbar’s number.PloS one, 6(8):e22656, 2011. Manuscript submitted to ACM 22 Di Marco et al

2011
[169]

Who sets the agenda on social media? ideology and polarization in online debates, 2024

Edoardo Loru, Alessandro Galeazzi, Anita Bonetti, Emanuele Sangiorgio, Niccolò Di Marco, Matteo Cinelli, Andrea Baronchelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Who sets the agenda on social media? ideology and polarization in online debates, 2024

2024
[170]

Growing polarization around climate change on social media.Nature Climate Change, 12(12):1114–1121, 2022

Max Falkenberg, Alessandro Galeazzi, Maddalena Torricelli, Niccolò Di Marco, Francesca Larosa, Madalina Sas, Amin Mekacher, Warren Pearce, Fabiana Zollo, Walter Quattrociocchi, et al. Growing polarization around climate change on social media.Nature Climate Change, 12(12):1114...

2022
[171]

Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations

Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations. InProceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems, pages 191–198, 2016

2016
[172]

Equity of attention: Amortizing individual fairness in rankings

Asia J Biega, Krishna P Gummadi, and Gerhard Weikum. Equity of attention: Amortizing individual fairness in rankings. InThe 41st international acm sigir conference on research & development in information retrieval, pages 405–414, 2018

2018
[173]

Designing and deploying online field experiments

Eytan Bakshy, Dean Eckles, and Michael S Bernstein. Designing and deploying online field experiments. InProceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web, pages 283–292, 2014

2014
[174]

Inside the echo chamber.Scientific American, 316(4):60–63, 2017

Walter Quattrociocchi. Inside the echo chamber.Scientific American, 316(4):60–63, 2017

2017
[175]

Echo chambers in online social networks: A systematic literature review.IEEE Access, 12:9594–9620, 2024

Amin Mahmoudi, Dariusz Jemielniak, and Leon Ciechanowski. Echo chambers in online social networks: A systematic literature review.IEEE Access, 12:9594–9620, 2024

2024
[176]

The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media.Information, communication & society, 21(5):729–745, 2018

Elizabeth Dubois and Grant Blank. The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media.Information, communication & society, 21(5):729–745, 2018

2018
[177]

Patterns of partisan toxicity and engagement reveal the common structure of online political communication across countries.Nature Communications, 15(1):9560, 2024

Max Falkenberg, Fabiana Zollo, Walter Quattrociocchi, Jürgen Pfeffer, and Andrea Baronchelli. Patterns of partisan toxicity and engagement reveal the common structure of online political communication across countries.Nature Communications, 15(1):9560, 2024

2024
[178]

Typing together? clustering of ideological types in online social networks.Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3-4):216–231, 2009

Brian J Gaines and Jeffery J Mondak. Typing together? clustering of ideological types in online social networks.Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 6(3-4):216–231, 2009

2009
[179]

A supply and demand framework for youtube politics.preprint, 2019

Kevin Munger and Joseph Phillips. A supply and demand framework for youtube politics.preprint, 2019

2019
[180]

David Hartmann, Sonja Mei Wang, Lena Pohlmann, and Bettina Berendt. A systematic review of echo chamber research: Comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes.Journal of Computational Social Science, 8(2):52, 2025

2025
[181]

Towards echo chamber assessment by employing aspect-based sentiment analysis and gdm consensus metrics.Online Social Networks and Media, 39:100276, 2024

Miriam Amendola, Danilo Cavaliere, Carmen De Maio, Giuseppe Fenza, and Vincenzo Loia. Towards echo chamber assessment by employing aspect-based sentiment analysis and gdm consensus metrics.Online Social Networks and Media, 39:100276, 2024

2024
[182]

Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change.Global environmental change, 32:126–138, 2015

Hywel TP Williams, James R McMurray, Tim Kurz, and F Hugo Lambert. Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change.Global environmental change, 32:126–138, 2015

2015
[183]

Emotional dynamics in the age of misinformation.PLOS ONE, 10(9):e0138740, September 2015

Fabiana Zollo, Petra Kralj Novak, Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Igor Mozetič, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Emotional dynamics in the age of misinformation.PLOS ONE, 10(9):e0138740, September 2015

2015
[184]

Recursive patterns in online echo chambers.Scientific Reports, 9(1):20118, 2019

Emanuele Brugnoli, Matteo Cinelli, Walter Quattrociocchi, and Antonio Scala. Recursive patterns in online echo chambers.Scientific Reports, 9(1):20118, 2019

2019
[185]

Social influence and unfollowing accelerate the emergence of echo chambers.Journal of Computational Social Science, 4(1):381–402, 2021

Kazutoshi Sasahara, Wen Chen, Hao Peng, Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. Social influence and unfollowing accelerate the emergence of echo chambers.Journal of Computational Social Science, 4(1):381–402, 2021

2021
[186]

Van Bavel, and Sander van der Linden

Steve Rathje, Jay J. Van Bavel, and Sander van der Linden. Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(26), June 2021

2021
[187]

Taekyoung

Daejin Choi, Selin Chun, Hyunchul Oh, Jinyoung Han, and Ted “Taekyoung” Kwon. Rumor propagation is amplified by echo chambers in social media.Scientific reports, 10(1):310, 2020

2020
[188]

Negativity drives online news consumption.Nature human behaviour, 7(5):812–822, 2023

Claire E Robertson, Nicolas Pröllochs, Kaoru Schwarzenegger, Philip Pärnamets, Jay J Van Bavel, and Stefan Feuerriegel. Negativity drives online news consumption.Nature human behaviour, 7(5):812–822, 2023

2023
[189]

Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 us election.Nature human behaviour, 4(5):472–480, 2020

Andrew M Guess, Brendan Nyhan, and Jason Reifler. Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 us election.Nature human behaviour, 4(5):472–480, 2020

2016
[190]

Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.Cognition, 188:39–50, 2019

Gordon Pennycook and David G Rand. Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning.Cognition, 188:39–50, 2019

2019
[191]

Eugene Stanley, and Walter Quattrociocchi

Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H. Eugene Stanley, and Walter Quattrociocchi. The spreading of misinformation online.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3):554–559, January 2016

2016
[192]

Debunking in a world of tribes.PLOS ONE, 12(7):e0181821, July 2017

Fabiana Zollo, Alessandro Bessi, Michela Del Vicario, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, Louis Shekhtman, Shlomo Havlin, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Debunking in a world of tribes.PLOS ONE, 12(7):e0181821, July 2017

2017
[193]

Research challenges of digital misinformation: Toward a trustworthy web.AI Magazine, 39(1):65–74, 2018

Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, Alexios Mantzarlis, Gregory Maus, and Filippo Menczer. Research challenges of digital misinformation: Toward a trustworthy web.AI Magazine, 39(1):65–74, 2018

2018
[194]

The science of fake news.Science, 359(6380):1094–1096, 2018

David MJ Lazer, Matthew A Baum, Yochai Benkler, Adam J Berinsky, Kelly M Greenhill, Filippo Menczer, Miriam J Metzger, Brendan Nyhan, Gordon Pennycook, David Rothschild, et al. The science of fake news.Science, 359(6380):1094–1096, 2018

2018
[195]

Comparing information diffusion mechanisms by matching on cascade size.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(46):e2100786118, 2021

Jonas L Juul and Johan Ugander. Comparing information diffusion mechanisms by matching on cascade size.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(46):e2100786118, 2021

2021
[196]

You’re definitely wrong, maybe: Correction style has minimal effect on corrections of misinformation online.Media and Communication, 9(1):120–133, 2021

Cameron Martel, Mohsen Mosleh, and David G Rand. You’re definitely wrong, maybe: Correction style has minimal effect on corrections of misinformation online.Media and Communication, 9(1):120–133, 2021. Manuscript submitted to ACM Patterns, Models, and Challenges in Online Soci...

2021
[197]

Misinformation warning labels are widely effective: A review of warning effects and their moderating features

Cameron Martel and David G Rand. Misinformation warning labels are widely effective: A review of warning effects and their moderating features. Current Opinion in Psychology, 54:101710, 2023

2023
[198]

Understanding effects of algorithmic vs

Chenyan Jia, Alexander Boltz, Angie Zhang, Anqing Chen, and Min Kyung Lee. Understanding effects of algorithmic vs. community label on perceived accuracy of hyper-partisan misinformation.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2):1–27, 2022

2022
[199]

Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(1):1, 2021

Rakoen Maertens, Jon Roozenbeek, Melisa Basol, and Sander van der Linden. Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(1):1, 2021

2021
[200]

Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing.Psychological science in the public interest, 13(3):106–131, 2012

Stephan Lewandowsky, Ullrich KH Ecker, Colleen M Seifert, Norbert Schwarz, and John Cook. Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing.Psychological science in the public interest, 13(3):106–131, 2012

2012
[201]

Impact of correcting misinformation on social disruption

Ryusuke Iizuka, Fujio Toriumi, Mao Nishiguchi, Masanori Takano, and Mitsuo Yoshida. Impact of correcting misinformation on social disruption. Plos one, 17(4):e0265734, 2022

2022
[202]

A meta-analysis of correction effects in science-relevant misinformation.Nature Human Behaviour, 7(9):1514–1525, 2023

Man-pui Sally Chan and Dolores Albarracín. A meta-analysis of correction effects in science-relevant misinformation.Nature Human Behaviour, 7(9):1514–1525, 2023

2023
[203]

Identity effects in social media.Nature Human Behaviour, 7(1):27–37, 2023

Sean J Taylor, Lev Muchnik, Madhav Kumar, and Sinan Aral. Identity effects in social media.Nature Human Behaviour, 7(1):27–37, 2023

2023
[204]

Lance Holbert, and Yasmin Morag

Nathan Walter, Jonathan Cohen, R. Lance Holbert, and Yasmin Morag. Fact-checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom.Political Communication, 37(3):350–375, October 2019

2019
[205]

Ethan Porter and Thomas J. Wood. The global effectiveness of fact-checking: Evidence from simultaneous experiments in argentina, nigeria, south africa, and the united kingdom.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(37), September 2021

2021
[208]

Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political misperceptions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15):e1912440117, 2021

Brendan Nyhan. Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political misperceptions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15):e1912440117, 2021

2021
[209]

Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public.Nature medicine, 28(3):460–467, 2022

Sander Van Der Linden. Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public.Nature medicine, 28(3):460–467, 2022

2022
[210]

Towards psychological herd immunity: Cross-cultural evidence for two prebunking interventions against covid-19 misinformation.Big Data & Society, 8(1):20539517211013868, 2021

Melisa Basol, Jon Roozenbeek, Manon Berriche, Fatih Uenal, William P McClanahan, and Sander van der Linden. Towards psychological herd immunity: Cross-cultural evidence for two prebunking interventions against covid-19 misinformation.Big Data & Society, 8(1):20539517211013868, 2021

2021
[211]

inoculation

Sander van der Linden and Jon Roozenbeek. “inoculation” to resist misinformation.Jama, 331(22):1961–1962, 2024

1961
[212]

Psychological inoculation against misinformation: Current evidence and future directions.The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 700(1):136–151, 2022

Cecilie S Traberg, Jon Roozenbeek, and Sander van der Linden. Psychological inoculation against misinformation: Current evidence and future directions.The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 700(1):136–151, 2022

2022
[213]

Psychological inoculation against fake news.The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation, pages 147–169, 2020

Sander Van der Linden, Jon Roozenbeek, et al. Psychological inoculation against fake news.The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation, pages 147–169, 2020

2020
[214]

Uncovering coordinated networks on social media: methods and case studies

Diogo Pacheco, Pik-Mai Hui, Christopher Torres-Lugo, Bao Tran Truong, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. Uncovering coordinated networks on social media: methods and case studies. InProceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, volume 15, pag...

2021
[215]

Temporal dynamics of coordinated online behavior: Stability, archetypes, and influence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(20), May 2024

Serena Tardelli, Leonardo Nizzoli, Maurizio Tesconi, Mauro Conti, Preslav Nakov, Giovanni Da San Martino, and Stefano Cresci. Temporal dynamics of coordinated online behavior: Stability, archetypes, and influence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(20), May 2024

2024
[216]

Coordinated inauthentic behavior and information spreading on twitter.Decision Support Systems, 160:113819, September 2022

Matteo Cinelli, Stefano Cresci, Walter Quattrociocchi, Maurizio Tesconi, and Paola Zola. Coordinated inauthentic behavior and information spreading on twitter.Decision Support Systems, 160:113819, September 2022

2022
[217]

The spread of propaganda by coordinated communities on social media

Kristina Hristakieva, Stefano Cresci, Giovanni Da San Martino, Mauro Conti, and Preslav Nakov. The spread of propaganda by coordinated communities on social media. InProceedings of the 14th ACM web science conference 2022, pages 191–201, 2022

2022
[218]

Amplifying influence through coordinated behaviour in social networks.Social Network Analysis and Mining, 11(1), 2021

Derek Weber and Frank Neumann. Amplifying influence through coordinated behaviour in social networks.Social Network Analysis and Mining, 11(1), 2021

2021
[219]

The rise of social bots.Communications of the ACM, 59(7):96–104, 2016

Emilio Ferrara, Onur Varol, Clayton Davis, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. The rise of social bots.Communications of the ACM, 59(7):96–104, 2016

2016
[220]

A decade of social bot detection.Communications of the ACM, 63(10):72–83, September 2020

Stefano Cresci. A decade of social bot detection.Communications of the ACM, 63(10):72–83, September 2020

2020
[221]

Anyone can become a troll: Causes of trolling behavior in online discussions

Justin Cheng, Michael Bernstein, Cristian Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, and Jure Leskovec. Anyone can become a troll: Causes of trolling behavior in online discussions. InProceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW ’17, p...

2017
[222]

Coordinated behavior on social media in 2019 uk general election.Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 15:443–454, May 2021

Leonardo Nizzoli, Serena Tardelli, Marco Avvenuti, Stefano Cresci, and Maurizio Tesconi. Coordinated behavior on social media in 2019 uk general election.Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 15:443–454, May 2021

2019
[223]

Analyzing the digital traces of political manipulation: The 2016 russian interference twitter campaign

Adam Badawy, Emilio Ferrara, and Kristina Lerman. Analyzing the digital traces of political manipulation: The 2016 russian interference twitter campaign. In2018 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM), pages 258–265. IEEE, 2018

2016
[224]

Springer International Publishing, 2020

Kai Shu, Suhang Wang, Dongwon Lee, and Huan Liu.Mining Disinformation and Fake News: Concepts, Methods, and Recent Advancements, page 1–19. Springer International Publishing, 2020. Manuscript submitted to ACM 24 Di Marco et al

2020
[225]

Kate Starbird, Ahmer Arif, and Tom Wilson. Disinformation as collaborative work: Surfacing the participatory nature of strategic information operations.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW):1–26, November 2019

2019
[226]

Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems

Massimo Stella, Emilio Ferrara, and Manlio De Domenico. Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49):12435–12440, 2018

2018
[227]

Red bots do it better: Comparative analysis of social bot partisan behavior

Luca Luceri, Ashok Deb, Adam Badawy, and Emilio Ferrara. Red bots do it better: Comparative analysis of social bot partisan behavior. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference, pages 1007–1012, 2019

2019
[228]

Keller, David Schoch, Sebastian Stier, and JungHwan Yang

Franziska B. Keller, David Schoch, Sebastian Stier, and JungHwan Yang. Political Astroturfing on Twitter: How to Coordinate a Disinformation Campaign.Political Communication, 37(2):256–280, 2020

2020
[229]

Keller, Sebastian Stier, and JungHwan Yang

David Schoch, Franziska B. Keller, Sebastian Stier, and JungHwan Yang. Coordination patterns reveal online political astroturfing across the world. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 2022

2022
[230]

Detecting and tracking political abuse in social media.Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1):297–304, August 2021

Jacob Ratkiewicz, Michael Conover, Mark Meiss, Bruno Goncalves, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. Detecting and tracking political abuse in social media.Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1):297–304, August 2021

2021
[231]

Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams

Jacob Ratkiewicz, Michael Conover, Mark Meiss, Bruno Gonçalves, Snehal Patil, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. Truthy: mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams. InProceedings of the 20th international conference companion on World wide web, pages 249–252, 2011

2011
[232]

(mis)information operations: An integrated perspective.Journal of Information Warfare, 18(3):83–98, 2019

M Cinelli, M Conti, L Finos, F Grisolia, P Kralj Novak, A Peruzzi, M Tesconi, F Zollo, and W Quattrociocchi. (mis)information operations: An integrated perspective.Journal of Information Warfare, 18(3):83–98, 2019

2019
[233]

The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics.Information, communication & society, 15(5):739–768, 2012

W Lance Bennett and Alexandra Segerberg. The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics.Information, communication & society, 15(5):739–768, 2012

2012
[234]

Peter Lang New York, 2013

Katrin Weller, Axel Bruns, Jean Elizabeth Burgess, Merja Mahrt, and Cornelius Puschmann.Twitter and society. Peter Lang New York, 2013

2013
[235]

Characterizing the life cycle of online news stories using social media reactions

Carlos Castillo, Mohammed El-Haddad, Jürgen Pfeffer, and Matt Stempeck. Characterizing the life cycle of online news stories using social media reactions. InProceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, pages 211–223, 2014

2014
[236]

Detection of bots in social media: a systematic review.Information Processing & Management, 57(4):102250, 2020

Mariam Orabi, Djedjiga Mouheb, Zaher Al Aghbari, and Ibrahim Kamel. Detection of bots in social media: a systematic review.Information Processing & Management, 57(4):102250, 2020

2020
[237]

Chad Edwards, Autumn Edwards, Patric R Spence, and Ashleigh K Shelton. Is that a bot running the social media feed? testing the differences in perceptions of communication quality for a human agent and a bot agent on twitter.Computers in Human Behavior, 33:372–376, 2014

2014
[238]

Detecting social bots on twitter: a literature review

Eiman Alothali, Nazar Zaki, Elfadil A Mohamed, and Hany Alashwal. Detecting social bots on twitter: a literature review. In2018 International conference on innovations in information technology (IIT), pages 175–180. IEEE, 2018

2018
[239]

Beyond interaction patterns: Assessing claims of coordinated inter-state information operations on twitter/x

Valeria Pantè, David Axelrod, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Menczer, Emilio Ferrara, and Luca Luceri. Beyond interaction patterns: Assessing claims of coordinated inter-state information operations on twitter/x. InCompanion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, WWW ’25...

2025
[240]

Post-hoc evaluation of nodes influence in information cascades: The case of coordinated accounts.ACM Transactions on the Web, 19(2):1–19, May 2025

Niccolò Di Marco, Sara Brunetti, Matteo Cinelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Post-hoc evaluation of nodes influence in information cascades: The case of coordinated accounts.ACM Transactions on the Web, 19(2):1–19, May 2025

2025
[241]

Iohunter: Graph foundation model to uncover online information operations

Marco Minici, Luca Luceri, Francesco Fabbri, and Emilio Ferrara. Iohunter: Graph foundation model to uncover online information operations. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 39(27):28258–28266, April 2025

2025
[242]

Nwala, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer

Alexander C. Nwala, Alessandro Flammini, and Filippo Menczer. A language framework for modeling social media account behavior.EPJ Data Science, 12(1), August 2023

2023
[243]

Exposing cross-platform coordinated inauthentic activity in the run-up to the 2024 u.s

Federico Cinus, Marco Minici, Luca Luceri, and Emilio Ferrara. Exposing cross-platform coordinated inauthentic activity in the run-up to the 2024 u.s. election. InProceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, WWW ’25, page 541–559. ACM, April 2025

2024
[244]

Dynamics of online hate and misinformation.Scientific Reports, 11(1), November 2021

Matteo Cinelli, Andraž Pelicon, Igor Mozetič, Walter Quattrociocchi, Petra Kralj Novak, and Fabiana Zollo. Dynamics of online hate and misinformation.Scientific Reports, 11(1), November 2021

2021
[245]

The influence of coordinated behavior on toxicity.Online Social Networks and Media, 43–44:100289, November 2024

Edoardo Loru, Matteo Cinelli, Maurizio Tesconi, and Walter Quattrociocchi. The influence of coordinated behavior on toxicity.Online Social Networks and Media, 43–44:100289, November 2024

2024
[246]

On the capability of evolved spambots to evade detection via genetic engineering.Online Social Networks and Media, 9:1–16, January 2019

Stefano Cresci, Marinella Petrocchi, Angelo Spognardi, and Stefano Tognazzi. On the capability of evolved spambots to evade detection via genetic engineering.Online Social Networks and Media, 9:1–16, January 2019

2019
[247]

Statistical physics of social dynamics.Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2):591–646, May 2009

Claudio Castellano, Santo Fortunato, and Vittorio Loreto. Statistical physics of social dynamics.Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2):591–646, May 2009

2009
[248]

Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation.Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2002

Hegselmann Rainer and Ulrich Krause. Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation.Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2002

2002
[249]

Models of social influence: Towards the next frontiers.Jasss-The journal of artificial societies and social simulation, 20(4):2, 2017

Andreas Flache, Michael Mäs, Thomas Feliciani, Edmund Chattoe-Brown, Guillaume Deffuant, Sylvie Huet, and Jan Lorenz. Models of social influence: Towards the next frontiers.Jasss-The journal of artificial societies and social simulation, 20(4):2, 2017

2017
[250]

Modeling opinion dynamics in social networks

Abhimanyu Das, Sreenivas Gollapudi, and Kamesh Munagala. Modeling opinion dynamics in social networks. InProceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 403–412, 2014

2014
[251]

Big data in psychology: A framework for research advancement.American Psychologist, 73(7):899, 2018

Idris Adjerid and Ken Kelley. Big data in psychology: A framework for research advancement.American Psychologist, 73(7):899, 2018

2018
[252]

Learning opinion dynamics from social traces

Corrado Monti, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, and Francesco Bonchi. Learning opinion dynamics from social traces. InProceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pages 764–773, 2020. Manuscript submitted to ACM Patterns, Mod...

2020
[253]

Opinion dynamics in social networks: From models to data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.01322, 2022

Antonio F Peralta, János Kertész, and Gerardo Iñiguez. Opinion dynamics in social networks: From models to data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.01322, 2022

2022 arXiv
[254]

Weidlich

W. Weidlich. The statistical description of polarization phenomena in society†.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 24(2):251–266, November 1971

1971
[255]

Sociophysics: A new approach of sociological collective behaviour

Serge Galam, Yuval Gefen (Feigenblat), and Yonathan Shapir. Sociophysics: A new approach of sociological collective behaviour. i. mean-behaviour description of a strike.The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 9(1):1–13, November 1982

1982
[256]

Towards a theory of collective phenomena: Consensus and attitude changes in groups.European Journal of Social Psychology, 21(1):49–74, January 1991

Serge Galam and Serge Moscovici. Towards a theory of collective phenomena: Consensus and attitude changes in groups.European Journal of Social Psychology, 21(1):49–74, January 1991

1991
[257]

From classical to modern opinion dynamics.International Journal of Modern Physics C, 31(07):2050101, 2020

Hossein Noorazar, Kevin R Vixie, Arghavan Talebanpour, and Yunfeng Hu. From classical to modern opinion dynamics.International Journal of Modern Physics C, 31(07):2050101, 2020

2020
[258]

Why we are failing at connecting opinion dynamics to the empirical world.Review of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 2023

Dino Carpentras. Why we are failing at connecting opinion dynamics to the empirical world.Review of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 2023

2023
[259]

Algorithmic bias amplifies opinion polarization: A bounded confidence model

Janos Kertesz, Alina Sirbu, Fosca Gianotti, and Dino Pedreschi. Algorithmic bias amplifies opinion polarization: A bounded confidence model. In StatPhys 27 Main Conference, 2019

2019
[260]

Modelling opinion dynamics in the age of algorithmic personalisation.Scientific reports, 9(1):7261, 2019

Nicola Perra and Luis EC Rocha. Modelling opinion dynamics in the age of algorithmic personalisation.Scientific reports, 9(1):7261, 2019

2019
[261]

Micro-foundation of opinion dynamics: Rich consequences of the weighted-median mechanism.Physical Review Research, 4(2):023213, 2022

Wenjun Mei, Francesco Bullo, Ge Chen, Julien M Hendrickx, and Florian Dörfler. Micro-foundation of opinion dynamics: Rich consequences of the weighted-median mechanism.Physical Review Research, 4(2):023213, 2022

2022
[262]

Convergence, consensus and dissensus in the weighted-median opinion dynamics.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2024

Wenjun Mei, Julien M Hendrickx, Ge Chen, Francesco Bullo, and Florian Dörfler. Convergence, consensus and dissensus in the weighted-median opinion dynamics.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 2024

2024
[263]

Nonlinear opinion dynamics with tunable sensitivity.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(3):1415–1430, 2022

Anastasia Bizyaeva, Alessio Franci, and Naomi Ehrich Leonard. Nonlinear opinion dynamics with tunable sensitivity.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(3):1415–1430, 2022

2022
[264]

A model for spatial conflict.Biometrika, 60(3):581–588, 1973

PETER CLIFFORD and AIDAN SUDBURY. A model for spatial conflict.Biometrika, 60(3):581–588, 1973

1973
[265]

Holley and Thomas M

Richard A. Holley and Thomas M. Liggett. Ergodic theorems for weakly interacting infinite systems and the voter model.The Annals of Probability, 3(4), August 1975

1975
[266]

Cambridge University Press, August 2001

Sidney Redner.A Guide to First-Passage Processes. Cambridge University Press, August 2001

2001
[267]

Liggett.Interacting Particle Systems

Thomas M. Liggett.Interacting Particle Systems. Springer New York, 1985

1985
[268]

Effective surface-tension in the noise-reduced voter model.Europhysics Letters (EPL), 77(6):60005, March 2007

Luca Dall’Asta and Claudio Castellano. Effective surface-tension in the noise-reduced voter model.Europhysics Letters (EPL), 77(6):60005, March 2007

2007
[269]

Granovsky and Neal Madras

Boris L. Granovsky and Neal Madras. The noisy voter model.Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 55(1):23–43, January 1995

1995
[270]

Banavar, Stephen P

Tommaso Zillio, Igor Volkov, Jayanth R. Banavar, Stephen P. Hubbell, and Amos Maritan. Spatial scaling in model plant communities.Physical Review Letters, 95(9), August 2005

2005
[271]

Antal, S

T. Antal, S. Redner, and V. Sood. Evolutionary dynamics on degree-heterogeneous graphs.Physical Review Letters, 96(18), May 2006

2006
[272]

Lost in translation? – caveat to the application of the voter model in ecology and evolutionary biology.Science Progress, 106(2), April 2023

Beáta Oborny. Lost in translation? – caveat to the application of the voter model in ecology and evolutionary biology.Science Progress, 106(2), April 2023

2023
[273]

Opinion formation on social networks with algorithmic bias: dynamics and bias imbalance

Antonio F Peralta, János Kertész, and Gerardo Iñiguez. Opinion formation on social networks with algorithmic bias: dynamics and bias imbalance. Journal of Physics: Complexity, 2(4):045009, 2021

2021
[274]

Dynamics of majority rule in two-state interacting spin systems.Physical Review Letters, 90(23):238701, 2003

Paul L Krapivsky and Sidney Redner. Dynamics of majority rule in two-state interacting spin systems.Physical Review Letters, 90(23):238701, 2003

2003
[275]

Divergence and consensus in majority rule.Physical Review E, 103(6):L060301, 2021

PL Krapivsky and S Redner. Divergence and consensus in majority rule.Physical Review E, 103(6):L060301, 2021

2021
[276]

Dynamics of majority rule on hypergraphs.Physical Review E, 104(2):024316, 2021

James Noonan and Renaud Lambiotte. Dynamics of majority rule on hypergraphs.Physical Review E, 104(2):024316, 2021

2021
[277]

Directed propaganda in the majority-rule model.International Journal of Modern Physics C, 35(07):2450082, 2024

Fabricio L Forgerini, Nuno Crokidakis, and Márcio AV Carvalho. Directed propaganda in the majority-rule model.International Journal of Modern Physics C, 35(07):2450082, 2024

2024
[278]

Majority dynamics: The power of one.Israel Journal of Mathematics, pages 1–49, 2024

Ashwin Sah and Mehtaab Sawhney. Majority dynamics: The power of one.Israel Journal of Mathematics, pages 1–49, 2024

2024
[279]

Majority-rule opinion dynamics with differential latency: a mechanism for self-organized collective decision-making.Swarm Intelligence, 5:305–327, 2011

Marco A Montes de Oca, Eliseo Ferrante, Alexander Scheidler, Carlo Pinciroli, Mauro Birattari, and Marco Dorigo. Majority-rule opinion dynamics with differential latency: a mechanism for self-organized collective decision-making.Swarm Intelligence, 5:305–327, 2011

2011
[280]

Chatterjee and E

S. Chatterjee and E. Seneta. Towards consensus: some convergence theorems on repeated averaging.Journal of Applied Probability, 14(1):89–97, March 1977

1977
[281]

M. Stone. The opinion pool.The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(4):1339–1342, December 1961

1961
[282]

Mixing beliefs among interacting agents.Advances in Complex Systems, 03(01n04):87–98, January 2000

Guillaume Deffuant, David Neau, Frederic Amblard, and Gérard Weisbuch. Mixing beliefs among interacting agents.Advances in Complex Systems, 03(01n04):87–98, January 2000

2000
[283]

Universality of the threshold for complete consensus for the opinion dynamics of deffuantet al.International Journal of Modern Physics C, 15(09):1301–1307, November 2004

SANTO FORTUNATO. Universality of the threshold for complete consensus for the opinion dynamics of deffuantet al.International Journal of Modern Physics C, 15(09):1301–1307, November 2004

2004
[284]

The bounded confidence model of opinion dynamics.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 22(02), February 2012

JAVIER GÓMEZ-SERRANO, CARL GRAHAM, and JEAN-YVES LE BOUDEC. The bounded confidence model of opinion dynamics.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 22(02), February 2012

2012
[285]

Generalized solutions to bounded-confidence models.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 31(06):1237–1276, April 2021

Benedetto Piccoli and Francesco Rossi. Generalized solutions to bounded-confidence models.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 31(06):1237–1276, April 2021. Manuscript submitted to ACM 26 Di Marco et al

2021
[286]

Bounded-confidence models of opinion dynamics with adaptive confidence bounds.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 24(2):994–1041, 2025

Grace J Li, Jiajie Luo, and Mason A Porter. Bounded-confidence models of opinion dynamics with adaptive confidence bounds.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 24(2):994–1041, 2025

2025
[287]

University of California, Los Angeles, 2024

Grace Jingying Li.Some Generalizations of Bounded-Confidence Models of Opinion Dynamics. University of California, Los Angeles, 2024

2024
[288]

Bounded confidence opinion dynamics in a social network of bayesian decision makers.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 8(4):576–585, 2014

Kush R Varshney. Bounded confidence opinion dynamics in a social network of bayesian decision makers.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 8(4):576–585, 2014

2014
[289]

Analyzing the extremization of opinions in a general framework of bounded confidence and repulsion.Information Sciences, 609:1256–1270, 2022

Jesús Giráldez-Cru, Carmen Zarco, and Oscar Cordón. Analyzing the extremization of opinions in a general framework of bounded confidence and repulsion.Information Sciences, 609:1256–1270, 2022

2022
[290]

Social influences in opinion dynamics: the role of conformity.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 414:19–30, 2014

Marco Alberto Javarone. Social influences in opinion dynamics: the role of conformity.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 414:19–30, 2014

2014
[291]

Valensise, Matteo Cinelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi

Carlo M. Valensise, Matteo Cinelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. The drivers of online polarization: Fitting models to data.Information Sciences, 642:119152, September 2023

2023
[292]

Sokolov, and Michele Starnini

Fabian Baumann, Philipp Lorenz-Spreen, Igor M. Sokolov, and Michele Starnini. Modeling echo chambers and polarization dynamics in social networks.Physical Review Letters, 124(4), January 2020

2020
[293]

Hernández, Luciano da Fontoura Costa, and Yamir Moreno

Henrique Ferraz de Arruda, Felipe Maciel Cardoso, Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda, Alexis R. Hernández, Luciano da Fontoura Costa, and Yamir Moreno. Modelling how social network algorithms can influence opinion polarization.Information Sciences, 588:265–278, April 2022

2022
[294]

Differences in the toxic language of cross-platform communities

Ashwini Kumar Singh, Vahid Ghafouri, Jose Such, and Guillermo Suarez-Tangil. Differences in the toxic language of cross-platform communities. InProceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, volume 18, pages 1463–1476, 2024

2024
[295]

News and misinformation consumption: A temporal comparison across european countries

Anees Baqir, Alessandro Galeazzi, and Fabiana Zollo. News and misinformation consumption: A temporal comparison across european countries. Plos one, 19(5):e0302473, 2024

2024
[296]

The impact of data resolution on dynamic causal inference in multiscale ecological networks.Communications Biology, 7(1):1442, 2024

Erik Saberski, Tom Lorimer, Delia Carpenter, Ethan Deyle, Ewa Merz, Joseph Park, Gerald M Pao, and George Sugihara. The impact of data resolution on dynamic causal inference in multiscale ecological networks.Communications Biology, 7(1):1442, 2024

2024
[297]

PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2024

Isabel E Murdock.Information Diffusion Over Diverse Social Media Platforms and the Simulated Cross-Platform Impacts of Interventions. PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2024. Manuscript submitted to ACM

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [39]

Persistent interaction patterns across social media platforms and over time.Nature, 628(8008):582–589, March 2024

Michele Avalle, Niccolò Di Marco, Gabriele Etta, Emanuele Sangiorgio, Shayan Alipour, Anita Bonetti, Lorenzo Alvisi, Antonio Scala, Andrea Baronchelli, Matteo Cinelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Persistent interaction patterns across social media platforms and over time.Nature, 628(8008):582–589, March 2024

2024

[2] [54]

Patterns of linguistic simplification on social media platforms over time.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(50), December 2024

Niccolò Di Marco, Edoardo Loru, Anita Bonetti, Alessandra Olga Grazia Serra, Matteo Cinelli, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Patterns of linguistic simplification on social media platforms over time.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 121(50), December 2024

2024

[3] [206]

Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(3):286–299, September 2020

Briony Swire-Thompson, Joseph DeGutis, and David Lazer. Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(3):286–299, September 2020

2020

[4] [207]

Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 9(3):286–299, 2020

Briony Swire-Thompson, Joseph DeGutis, and David Lazer. Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.Journal of applied research in memory and cognition, 9(3):286–299, 2020

2020

[5] [1]

The spreading of misinformation online.Proceedings of the national academy of Sciences, 113(3):554–559, 2016

Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H Eugene Stanley, and Walter Quattrociocchi. The spreading of misinformation online.Proceedings of the national academy of Sciences, 113(3):554–559, 2016

2016

[6] [2]

The spread of true and false news online.science, 359(6380):1146–1151, 2018

Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. The spread of true and false news online.science, 359(6380):1146–1151, 2018

2018

[7] [3]

Anatomy of news consumption on facebook.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(12):3035–3039, 2017

Ana Lucía Schmidt, Fabiana Zollo, Michela Del Vicario, Alessandro Bessi, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H Eugene Stanley, and Walter Quattrociocchi. Anatomy of news consumption on facebook.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(12):3035–3039, 2017

2017

[8] [4]

News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks.Social media+ society, 1(2):2056305115610141, 2015

Anna Sophie Kümpel, Veronika Karnowski, and Till Keyling. News sharing in social media: A review of current research on news sharing users, content, and networks.Social media+ society, 1(2):2056305115610141, 2015

2015