Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 215 references

Stablecoins: Fundamentals, Emerging Issues, and Open Challenges

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A systematic review of 209 stablecoin papers organizes the field into 26 research questions and exposes its gaps.

desk verdict A useful organizing map of stablecoin research, but its headline gap claims rest on a single-coder taxonomy that isn't independently checkable as reported. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.13883 v1 pith:SJZDLHYH submitted 2025-07-18 econ.GN cs.CRq-fin.EC

Ahmed Mahrous , Maurantonio Caprolu , Roberto Di Pietro This is my paper · ORCID
classification econ.GNcs.CRq-fin.EC
keywords stablecoinsystematicliteraturereviewresearchtaxonomycryptocurrencycentralbankdigitalcurrencyDecentralizedFinance(DeFi)gapsregulatorychallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that stablecoin research, though growing fast, is fragmented and that a systematic review can fix that. Analyzing 209 Scopus-indexed documents, the authors identify 26 research questions spanning economic, technical, and policy dimensions. The resulting map shows where the field is crowded—price correlation and stability studies dominate—and where it is nearly empty, notably security, privacy, governance, failure analysis, and accounting treatment. The paper matters because a reliable map lets researchers and policymakers see what is known, what is contested, and what remains unstudied.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is a hand-built classification scheme. A Scopus query for 'stablecoin*' or 'stable coin*' in titles, abstracts, and keywords, restricted to English articles, proceedings, and reviews and cut off in September 2024, yielded 236 documents; after removing paywalled, non-English, and off-topic items, 209 papers were coded into 26 research questions. The taxonomy does the argument's work: it converts a scattered literature into comparable slots, exposes overcrowded and empty slots, and supports per-question summaries of findings, methodologies, and data sources.

What would settle it

Have two independent raters code the same 209 documents with the paper's taxonomy and measure inter-rater agreement, or re-run the search on a second database (e.g., Web of Science) and count how many additional stablecoin papers do not fit any of the 26 questions. Low agreement or many non-fitting papers would show that the taxonomy and gap list are not stable features of the literature.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the stablecoin literature can be organized into 26 research questions grouped into three macro-categories, and that this organization reveals a lopsided field. Price and volume correlation studies account for the largest share of papers, while privacy (one paper), security, governance, and failure analysis are severely underrepresented. The review also surfaces conflicting results—such as whether Tether issuance moves Bitcoin prices—and traces the disagreements to differences in data granularity and model choice. It presents itself as the first systematic review that covers economic, technical, and regulatory research in one framework.

Load-bearing premise

The map's validity rests on the sample: if the Scopus query plus Google Scholar additions missed large parts of relevant work, or if the authors' hand-coding into 26 questions is not reproducible, the described gaps could be artifacts of sampling and subjective categorization rather than real properties of the field.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Future researchers get a ready-made list of underexplored topics, including stablecoin security, privacy, governance, non-Terra failures, and accounting standards.
  • New empirical work on stablecoin prices should take the documented non-linearity, regime-switching, and heavy tails into account rather than defaulting to VAR or GARCH models.
  • The identified data-source gap points to high-frequency and on-chain transaction data as the main unmet data need.
  • The taxonomy can serve as an updating scheme: new papers can be slotted into the 26 questions as the literature grows.
  • Conflicting findings in the literature are attributed to methodology and data differences, which sets an agenda for replication studies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the authors do not pursue is a comparative autopsy of the listed but unstudied failed stablecoins (Basis Cash, NuBits, BeanStalk, Acala USD), which could turn failure analysis from two cases into a proper taxonomy.
  • The review's September 2024 cutoff means its gap list will age quickly; the same coding scheme could be maintained as a living index.
  • The paper observes that over 99% of stablecoins are USD-pegged; a testable policy-adjacent inference is that US regulatory choices about stablecoin reserves and issuance will effectively determine whether dollarization spreads in smaller economies.
  • Given that only one paper studies privacy, one could test whether stablecoin privacy features systematically affect adoption; the review's data sources do not yet support this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents a systematic literature review of stablecoin research. The authors query Scopus with a reported search string, supplement the results with Google Scholar searches and selected technical reports, and filter the corpus to 209 English-language documents. They identify 26 research questions, organize them into 10 sub-categories and 3 macro-categories (Economic Analysis, Technical Analysis, Position and Policy Papers), and assign each document to exactly one research question; Table II reports per-question counts that sum to 209. The body of the paper synthesizes findings, methodologies, and open questions under each research question, and the discussion identifies research gaps in areas such as security and privacy, governance, failure analysis, and accounting treatment. The paper also includes original data visualizations of stablecoin prices, market shares, and crisis episodes.

Significance. If the taxonomy and gap analysis are sound, the paper provides a useful map of a large and fragmented literature and a concrete agenda for future research. It is one of the most comprehensive stablecoin surveys to date in terms of corpus size, and it explicitly documents the search query, the filter steps, and the aggregate category counts. The authors also transparently position the paper as an extension of their earlier 111-paper survey, and they draw attention to several understudied topics that deserve further work. The main limitation is that the central contribution—the assignment of 209 documents to 26 research questions—rests on a single-coder categorization without a published codebook, inter-rater reliability check, or item-level audit trail; this makes the headline gap claims vulnerable to coding choices. The paper also contains several internal numeric inconsistencies between Table II and the prose. Neither issue is fatal, but both must be resolved for the survey to serve as a reliable reference.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Table II] The central categorization is not reproducible as reported. The manuscript gives the Scopus query and the aggregate exclusion counts, but it provides no codebook defining the 26 research questions, no documented decision rules for borderline papers, no inter-rater reliability assessment, and no list of which of the 209 documents are assigned to which research question. The Google Scholar integration is described only as "integrated" without search strings, inclusion criteria, or an exclusion log, and the 14 papers removed for "not focusing significantly on Stablecoins" are not enumerated. Because the headline research-gap claims (security and privacy, governance, failure analysis, accounting standards) are derived from the per-question counts in Table II, readers cannot independently verify the taxonomy or the counts. I recommend adding a supplementary appendix containing the full coding protocol, the list of included and excluded documents with their research-question assignments, and a flow diagram of the search and screening process; if a second coder is not feasible, a self-coding audit trail or a sensitivity analysis showing how plausible alternative assignments would affect the gap claims would substantively increase confidence.
  2. [Section IV.A.4, Section IV.B, Section V.B, Table II; Section VII.A] Several per-question counts in Table II are inconsistent with the prose. For research question 4 ("How do external crises impact stablecoins?"), Table II lists 5 papers but Section IV.A.4 says "The research question ... is addressed by four papers." For research question 5 ("What are the economic, financial, and policy impacts of adopting stablecoins?"), Table II lists 4 papers but Section IV.B twice refers to "three papers." For research question 17 ("What are the characteristics of stabilization mechanisms used in stablecoins?"), Table II lists 14 papers but Section V.B states "Fifteen papers analyze the stabilization mechanisms." In addition, Section VII.A says the first research question (price/volume correlation) is "the focus of more than 30% of the papers analyzed in this study," yet Table II gives 37/209 ≈ 18% overall (or 37/111 ≈ 33% of the economic category, which is not what the sentence says). These mismatches directly undercut the paper's systematic, count-based claims and should be reconciled, with a complete citation list for each research question provided either in the text or in the supplementary material.
  3. [Section III (Methodology)] The sampling strategy is not auditable enough to support the paper's comprehensiveness claim. The search stops in September 2024, excludes non-English and paywalled works, and the Google Scholar supplement is described only as "searches ... to include novel contributions from peer-reviewed venues—not yet indexed on Scopus—and potentially other relevant documents from trusted sources, e.g., technical reports from the European Central Bank." No list is given of the documents added from Google Scholar, the search strings used, or the reasons for including or excluding particular items. As a result, the identified research gaps (e.g., the scarcity of work on security, privacy, governance, and accounting treatments) could be artifacts of the sampling scheme rather than properties of the literature. I ask that the authors provide a complete list of the Scopus-derived documents and the Google Scholar-derived documents, with their dates and venues, and a transparent account of any inclusion/exclusion decisions beyond the stated language and paywall filters.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figures throughout] Several figure captions and surrounding text contain garbled placeholder strings (e.g., sequences of "/uni00000013/...") that appear to be rendering artifacts; these should be removed or regenerated before publication.
  2. [Section II (Related Work)] There is a typo in the discussion of ref. [9]: "stabecloin-related literature" should read "stablecoin-related literature." The text also repeatedly renders "Silicon Valley" as "Silicon V alley" (e.g., in Fig. 4 and Section IV.A.4), which should be corrected in a proofreading pass.
  3. [Section III (Methodology)] The Scopus query as printed, with "LOAD-DATE < 20240917" and the formatting of the LIMIT-TO clauses, should be double-checked against Scopus's current search syntax; if LOAD-DATE is not a valid field, the query will not reproduce the reported results.
  4. [Section VII.A (Research Trends)] The sentence "only two papers analyze security concerns related to stablecoins" should be clarified: according to Table II, the Security and Privacy sub-category contains four papers across three research questions (privacy, security threats, and market manipulation), so the statement should specify which questions count as "security concerns" and which do not.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this is a literature survey whose contributions are categorical synthesis and gap identification, not a derivation chain with fitted or self-defined predictions.

full rationale

The paper is a systematic literature review. Its central claims are that it identifies 26 research questions from 209 Scopus-indexed documents, categorizes the literature, and reports research gaps. There is no equation-based derivation, no fitted parameter later renamed as a prediction, and no theoretical result whose conclusion is built into its assumptions. The only self-citation is the authors' earlier survey [15], and the paper explicitly presents the current work as an extension rather than as a conclusion imported from that source: 'Mahrous et al. [15] presented an earlier survey of stablecoin literature which this, more comprehensive, study now extends.' This self-citation is disclosed and is not load-bearing; the taxonomy in Table II and the per-question counts are generated from the present corpus and coding process, not derived from [15]. The methodological limitations noted by a skeptical reader—single-coder classification, no inter-rater reliability protocol, opaque Google Scholar supplementation—are concerns about validity and reproducibility, not circularity. The review does not rename a known empirical pattern as a new result, nor does it invoke a uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work. Accordingly, the appropriate finding is no significant circularity (score 0).

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities; the paper introduces a taxonomy, not a model. The main inputs are the selected literature and the authors' subjective classification.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Scopus-indexed literature plus supplemental Google Scholar results is representative of the academic stablecoin literature.
    Section III: the survey's 'comprehensive' claim relies on this sample; non-English, paywalled, and non-indexed works are excluded, which could bias the identified gaps.
  • ad hoc to paper The 26 research questions are a faithful, reproducible coding of the 209 documents.
    Section III and Table II: the categorization is presented without a documented coding protocol, inter-rater reliability, or member checking.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stablecoins: Fundamentals, Emerging Issues, and Open Challenges." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SJZDLHYH

@misc{pith2026250713883,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stablecoins: Fundamentals, Emerging Issues, and Open Challenges},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SJZDLHYH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.13883}
}
read the original abstract

Stablecoins, with a capitalization exceeding 200 billion USD as of January 2025, have shown significant growth, with annual transaction volumes exceeding 10 trillion dollars in 2023 and nearly doubling that figure in 2024. This exceptional success has attracted the attention of traditional financial institutions, with an increasing number of governments exploring the potential of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). Although academia has recognized the importance of stablecoins, research in this area remains fragmented, incomplete, and sometimes contradictory. In this paper, we aim to address the cited gap with a structured literature analysis, correlating recent contributions to present a picture of the complex economic, technical, and regulatory aspects of stablecoins. To achieve this, we formulate the main research questions and categorize scientific contributions accordingly, identifying main results, data sources, methodologies, and open research questions. The research questions we address in this survey paper cover several topics, such as the stability of various stablecoins, novel designs and implementations, and relevant regulatory challenges. The studies employ a wide range of methodologies and data sources, which we critically analyze and synthesize. Our analysis also reveals significant research gaps, including limited studies on security and privacy, underexplored stablecoins, unexamined failure cases, unstudied governance mechanisms, and the treatment of stablecoins under financial accounting standards, among other areas.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.13883 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Number of papers per year for each macro-category. The data for 2024 are updated as of the time of our search query, conducted in September 2024 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Scatter plots of USDT daily returns against BTC, S&P 500, USDC, and gold from 2020 to 2025. Each plot includes a fitted linear regression line. Data was sourced from Yahoo Finance API. volumes. Decentralized stablecoins like DAI are more sensitive to institutional announcements compared to centralized stablecoins such as USDC and USDT [39]. Ante and Saggu [40] found a bidirectional causal relationship between stable… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Daily BTC price and USDT circulating supply (in billions of USD) from 2020 to 2025. Data was sourced from CoinDesk API [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Time series of major stablecoin prices, with two crises annotated: Black Thursday (COVID-19 crash), and Silicon Valley Bank collapse. The FTX crisis also caused market discrepancies between exchanges (different prices of the same stablecoin) [52]. Exchanges can general…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The Impossible Trinity, or Trilemma, in international economics. It states that a country can simultaneously achieve at most two of the following three policy objectives at a given time—capital mobility, fixed exchange rate, and monetary policy autonomy. Park and Kwon …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Minute-by-minute Prices of USDT and USDC during the SVB Crisis. Data was sourced from CoinDesk API. The Terra-Luna collapse caused volatility across multiple stable￾coins, yet collateral-backed stablecoins experienced increased demand and maintained relative stability …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Structure of a dual-token stablecoin mechanism. Dual-token stablecoin mechanism based on overcollateralized ETH. A user deposits $1.50 in ETH to mint $1.00 of stablecoin and $0.50 of a secondary token. If ETH changes ±10% in value, the stablecoin maintains its peg whil…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Minute-by-minute price movements of UST and LUNA during the Terra–Luna collapse in May 2022. Vertical lines indicate two key events: (a) May 7, 22:00: UST first depegs following a liquidity shock on Curve’s 3pool; intervention by the Luna Foundation Guard follows. (b) …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Market capitalization and market share of major stablecoins from 2021 to 2025. Data was sourced from CoinGecko API. Insight 28: CBDCs compete on a geopolitical level, with some nations seeing them as a way to reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar. Insight 29: USD-backed s…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Global status of Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) projects. Countries are color-coded by project stage. Data was sourced from CBDC Tracker. Stablecoins promise several advantages over traditional fiat curren￾cies, including more efficient cross-border transfers [1…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

215 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (2025) Stablecoins circulating

    DeFiLlama. (2025) Stablecoins circulating. Accessed: 01/03/2025. [Online]. Available: https://defillama.com/stable coins

    2025

  2. [2]

    State of stablecoins: 2024,

    CoinGecko, “State of stablecoins: 2024,” 2024, accessed: 01/03/2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.coingecko.co m/research/publications/state-of-stablecoins-2024

    2024

  3. [3]

    Paypal usd,

    PayPal, “Paypal usd,” https://www.paypal.com/us/digital-w allet/manage-money/crypto/pyusd, accessed: 01/03/2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Jpmorgan launches jpm coin,

    M.-A. Russon, “Jpmorgan launches jpm coin,” https://www. bbc.com/news/business-47240760, accessed: 01/03/2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    Facebook-backed crypto project diem,

    T. Wilson and P . Schroeder, “Facebook-backed crypto project diem,” https://www.reuters.com/technology/facebook-bac ked-crypto-project-diem-launch-us-stablecoin-major-shift -2021-05-12/, accessed: 01/03/2025

    2021

  6. [6]

    Central bank digital currency (cbdc) tracker,

    Atlantic Council, “Central bank digital currency (cbdc) tracker,” https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/cbdctracker/, accessed: 01/03/2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    A systematic literature review of empirical research on stablecoins,

    L. Ante, I. Fiedler, J. M. Willruth, and F. Steinmetz, “A systematic literature review of empirical research on stablecoins,”FinT ech, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 34–47, 2023

    2023

  8. [8]

    On stablecoin: Ecosystem, architecture, mechanism and applicability as payment method,

    D. Li, D. Han, T.-H. Weng, Z. Zheng, H. Li, and K.-C. Li, “On stablecoin: Ecosystem, architecture, mechanism and applicability as payment method,”Computer Standards & Interfaces, vol. 87, p. 103747, 2024

    2024

Show all 215 references
  1. [9]

    A survey of blockchain-based stablecoin: Cryptocurrencies and central bank digital currencies,

    J. Zhu, J. Zou, Y . Jing, W. Y ao, Y . Mo, and Z. Zheng, “A survey of blockchain-based stablecoin: Cryptocurrencies and central bank digital currencies,” inInternational Conference on Blockchain and Trustworthy Systems. Springer, 2022, pp. 177–193

    2022

  2. [10]

    Sok: demystifying stablecoins,

    J. Clark, D. Demirag, and M. Moosavi, “Sok: demystifying stablecoins,”Communications of the ACM, F orthcoming, 2019

    2019

  3. [11]

    Monetary stabilization in cryptocurrencies–design approaches and open questions,

    I. G. Pernice, S. Henningsen, R. Proskalovich, M. Florian, H. Elendner, and B. Scheuermann, “Monetary stabilization in cryptocurrencies–design approaches and open questions,” in 2019 crypto valley conference on blockchain technology (cvcbt). IEEE, 2019, pp. 47–59

    2019

  4. [12]

    What is stablecoin?: A survey on price stabilization mechanisms for decentralized payment systems,

    M. Mita, K. Ito, S. Ohsawa, and H. Tanaka, “What is stablecoin?: A survey on price stabilization mechanisms for decentralized payment systems,” in2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI). IEEE, 2019, pp. 60–66

    2019

  5. [13]

    Sok: A classification framework for stablecoin designs,

    A. Moin, K. Sekniqi, and E. G. Sirer, “Sok: A classification framework for stablecoin designs,” inFinancial Cryptography and Data Security: 24th International Conference, FC 2020, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia, F ebruary 10–14, 2020 Revised Selected P apers 24. Springer, 2020, pp. 174–197

    2020

  6. [14]

    10 years of stablecoins: Their impact, what we know, and future research directions,

    L. Dionysopoulos and A. Urquhart, “10 years of stablecoins: Their impact, what we know, and future research directions,” Economics Letters, vol. 244, p. 111939, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Sok: A structured analysis of economic and technical stablecoin-related research,

    A. Mahrous, M. Caprolu, and R. Di Pietro, “Sok: A structured analysis of economic and technical stablecoin-related research,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC), 2025, accepted for presentation at IEEE ICBC 2025, to be h...

    2025

  8. [16]

    Are stablecoins truly diversifiers, hedges, or safe havens against traditional cryptocurrencies as their name suggests?

    G.-J. Wang, X.-y. Ma, and H.-y. Wu, “Are stablecoins truly diversifiers, hedges, or safe havens against traditional cryptocurrencies as their name suggests?” Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 54, p. 101225, 2020

    2020

  9. [17]

    A crypto safe haven against 30 bitcoin,

    D. G. Baur and L. T. Hoang, “A crypto safe haven against 30 bitcoin,”Finance Research Letters, vol. 38, p. 101431, 2021

    2021

  10. [18]

    Looking for a safe haven against american stocks during covid-19 pandemic,

    A. Kliber, “Looking for a safe haven against american stocks during covid-19 pandemic,”The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 63, p. 101825, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Analysis of cryptocurrency dynamics in the emerging market economies: does reinforcement or substitution effect prevail?

    C. A. Anisiuba, O. P . Egbo, F. C. Alio, C. Ifediora, E. C. Igwemeka, C. Odidi, and H. C. Ezeaku, “Analysis of cryptocurrency dynamics in the emerging market economies: does reinforcement or substitution effect prevail?”Sage Open, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 21582440211002516, 2021

    2021

  12. [20]

    Analyzing safe haven, hedging and diversifier characteristics of heterogeneous cryp- tocurrencies against g7 and brics market indexes,

    M. F. A. Gadi and M.-A. Sicilia, “Analyzing safe haven, hedging and diversifier characteristics of heterogeneous cryp- tocurrencies against g7 and brics market indexes,”Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 15, no. 12, p. 572, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Stablecoins as diversifiers, hedges and safe havens: A quantile coherency approach,

    H. Kołodziejczyk, “Stablecoins as diversifiers, hedges and safe havens: A quantile coherency approach,”The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 66, p. 101912, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Can gold-backed cryptocurrencies have dynamic hedging and safe-haven abilities against defi and nft assets?

    R. Belguith, Y . S. Manzli, A. Bejaoui, and A. Jeribi, “Can gold-backed cryptocurrencies have dynamic hedging and safe-haven abilities against defi and nft assets?” Digital Business, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 100077, 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Stablecoins as a tool to mitigate the downside risk of cryptocurrency portfolios,

    A. D´ıaz, C. Esparcia, and D. Hu´elamo, “Stablecoins as a tool to mitigate the downside risk of cryptocurrency portfolios,” The North American Journal of Economics and Finance , vol. 64, p. 101838, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    Are stablecoins better safe havens or hedges against global stock markets than other assets? comparative analysis during the covid-19 pandemic,

    J. Feng, Y . Y uan, and M. Jiang, “Are stablecoins better safe havens or hedges against global stock markets than other assets? comparative analysis during the covid-19 pandemic,” International Review of Economics & Finance, vol. 92, pp. 275–301, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Do asset-backed stablecoins spread crypto volatility to traditional financial assets? evidence from tether,

    G. S. T. Wu and P . H. Leung, “Do asset-backed stablecoins spread crypto volatility to traditional financial assets? evidence from tether,”Economics Letters, vol. 229, p. 111213, 2023

    2023

  18. [26]

    Information transmission among energy markets, cryptocurrencies, and stablecoins under pandemic conditions,

    Y . Ghabri, O. B. Rhouma, M. Gana, K. Guesmi, and R. Benkraiem, “Information transmission among energy markets, cryptocurrencies, and stablecoins under pandemic conditions,” International Review of Financial Analysis , vol. 82, p. 102197, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    When tether says “jump!

    K. Grobys and T. L. D. Huynh, “When tether says “jump!” bitcoin asks “how low?”,”Finance Research Letters, vol. 47, p. 102644, 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    The role of binance in bitcoin volatility transmission,

    C. Alexander, D. F. Heck, and A. Kaeck, “The role of binance in bitcoin volatility transmission,” Applied Mathematical Finance, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–32, 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    Spillover effects, lead and lag relationships, and stable coins time series,

    S. Paeng, D. Senteney, and T. Y ang, “Spillover effects, lead and lag relationships, and stable coins time series,”The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 95, pp. 45–60, 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Stablecoins as the cornerstone in the linkage between the digital and conventional financial markets,

    M. Gubareva, A. Bossman, and T. Teplova, “Stablecoins as the cornerstone in the linkage between the digital and conventional financial markets,”The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, vol. 68, p. 101979, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    V olatility co-movement between bitcoin and stablecoins: Bekk–garch and copula–dcc–garch approaches,

    K.-S. Chen and S.-H. Chang, “V olatility co-movement between bitcoin and stablecoins: Bekk–garch and copula–dcc–garch approaches,”Axioms, vol. 11, no. 6, p. 259, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Econometrics of testing for jumps in financial economics using bipower variation,

    O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen and N. Shephard, “Econometrics of testing for jumps in financial economics using bipower variation,”Journal of financial Econometrics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2006

    2006

  25. [33]

    Dissecting tether’s nonlinear dynamics during covid-19,

    M. Maiti, Z. Grubisic, and D. B. Vukovic, “Dissecting tether’s nonlinear dynamics during covid-19,” Journal of Open Innovation: T echnology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 161, 2020

    2020

  26. [34]

    On stablecoin price processes and arbitrage,

    I. G. A. Pernice, “On stablecoin price processes and arbitrage,” in Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2021 International W orkshops: CoDecFin, DeFi, VOTING, and WTSC, V irtual Event, March 5, 2021, Revised Selected P apers

    2021

  27. [35]

    Springer, 2021, pp. 124–135

    2021

  28. [36]

    A hypothesis test for the goodness-of-fit of the marginal distribution of a time series with application to stable- coin data,

    M. Levene, “A hypothesis test for the goodness-of-fit of the marginal distribution of a time series with application to stable- coin data,”Engineering Proceedings, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 10, 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    Stablecoins versus traditional cryptocurrencies in response to interbank rates,

    T. V . Nguyen, T. V . H. Nguyen, T. C. Nguyen, T. T. A. Pham, and Q. M. Nguyen, “Stablecoins versus traditional cryptocurrencies in response to interbank rates,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 47, p. 102744, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Forecast- ing macroeconomic effects of stablecoin adoption: A bayesian approach,

    M. M. Bojaj, M. Muhadinovic, A. Bracanovic, A. Mihailovic, M. Radulovic, I. Jolicic, I. Milosevic, and V . Milacic, “Forecast- ing macroeconomic effects of stablecoin adoption: A bayesian approach,”Economic Modelling, vol. 109, p. 105792, 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Economic sentiment and the cryptocurrency market in the post-covid-19 era,

    M. B. Osman, C. Urom, K. Guesmi, and R. Benkraiem, “Economic sentiment and the cryptocurrency market in the post-covid-19 era,”International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 91, p. 102962, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Dollar’s role in institutional and media impact on stablecoins,

    F. de l’Etang, “Dollar’s role in institutional and media impact on stablecoins,”Finance Research Letters, vol. 61, p. 104999, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Time-varying bidirectional causal rela- tionships between transaction fees and economic activity of sub- systems utilizing the ethereum blockchain network,

    L. Ante and A. Saggu, “Time-varying bidirectional causal rela- tionships between transaction fees and economic activity of sub- systems utilizing the ethereum blockchain network,”Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 19, 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    Cryptocurrency return predictability: What is the role of the environment?

    E. Clark, A. Lahiani, and S. Mefteh-Wali, “Cryptocurrency return predictability: What is the role of the environment?” T echnological F orecasting and Social Change, vol. 189, p. 122350, 2023

    2023

  35. [43]

    Directional predictability from central bank digital currency to cryptocurrencies and stablecoins,

    A. A yadi, Y . Ghabri, and K. Guesmi, “Directional predictability from central bank digital currency to cryptocurrencies and stablecoins,”Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 65, p. 101909, 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    Analysis of regulation policies in may 2021 on cryptocurrency market,

    J. Su, X. Li, M. Zhang, and Z. Jin, “Analysis of regulation policies in may 2021 on cryptocurrency market,” in Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on E-Business and Internet, 2022, pp. 175–181

    2021

  37. [45]

    The influence of stablecoin issuances on cryptocurrency markets,

    L. Ante, I. Fiedler, and E. Strehle, “The influence of stablecoin issuances on cryptocurrency markets,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 41, p. 101867, 2021

    2021

  38. [46]

    The impact of transparent money flows: Effects of stablecoin transfers on the returns and trading volume of bitcoin,

    ——, “The impact of transparent money flows: Effects of stablecoin transfers on the returns and trading volume of bitcoin,”T echnological F orecasting and Social Change, vol. 170, p. 120851, 2021

    2021

  39. [47]

    The intraday bitcoin response to tether minting and burning events: Asymmetry, investor sentiment, and “whale alerts

    A. Saggu, “The intraday bitcoin response to tether minting and burning events: Asymmetry, investor sentiment, and “whale alerts” on twitter,”Finance Research Letters, vol. 49, p. 103096, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    Is bitcoin really untethered?

    J. M. Griffin and A. Shams, “Is bitcoin really untethered?” The Journal of Finance, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 1913–1964, 2020

    1913

  41. [49]

    The impact of tether grants on bitcoin,

    W . C. Wei, “The impact of tether grants on bitcoin,”Economics Letters, vol. 171, pp. 19–22, 2018

    2018

  42. [50]

    Tethered, or untethered? on the interplay between stablecoins and major cryptoassets,

    L. Kristoufek, “Tethered, or untethered? on the interplay between stablecoins and major cryptoassets,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 43, p. 101991, 2021

    2021

  43. [51]

    On the role of stablecoins in cryptoasset pricing dynamics,

    ——, “On the role of stablecoins in cryptoasset pricing dynamics,”Financial Innovation, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 37, 2022

    2022

  44. [52]

    Which cryptocurrencies are mostly traded in distressed times?

    N. A. Kyriazis and P . Prassa, “Which cryptocurrencies are mostly traded in distressed times?” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 135, 2019

    2019

  45. [53]

    Market behaviors around 31 bankruptcy and frozen funds withdrawal: Trading stranded assets on ftx,

    L. Galati, A. Webb, and R. I. Webb, “Market behaviors around 31 bankruptcy and frozen funds withdrawal: Trading stranded assets on ftx,”Journal of Economics and Business, p. 106196, 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    Silicon valley bank bankruptcy and stablecoins stability,

    L. Galati and F. Capalbo, “Silicon valley bank bankruptcy and stablecoins stability,”International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 91, p. 103001, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Flight-to- quality—money market mutual funds and stablecoins during the march 2023 banking crisis,

    N. Oefele, D. G. Baur, and L. A. Smales, “Flight-to- quality—money market mutual funds and stablecoins during the march 2023 banking crisis,”Economics Letters, vol. 234, p. 111464, 2024

    2023

  48. [56]

    Bitcoin’s black swan: A retrospective on 2020’s “black thursday

    J. Redman, “Bitcoin’s black swan: A retrospective on 2020’s “black thursday”,” Oct 2023, accessed: 01/03/2025. [Online]. Available: https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoins-black-swan-a -retrospective-on-2020s-black-thursday/

    2020

  49. [57]

    What really happened to makerdao?

    L. Eichholz, “What really happened to makerdao?” Mar 2020, accessed: 01/03/2025. [Online]. Available: https://insights .glassnode.com/what-really-happened-to-makerdao/

    2020

  50. [58]

    (in)stability for the blockchain: Deleveraging spirals and stablecoin attacks,

    A. Klages-Mundt and A. Minca, “(in)stability for the blockchain: Deleveraging spirals and stablecoin attacks,” Jun

  51. [59]

    Stablecoins increasingly used for savings, pay- ments in emerging countries, but crypto trading still leads: Re- port,

    K. Sandor, “Stablecoins increasingly used for savings, pay- ments in emerging countries, but crypto trading still leads: Re- port,”Y ahoo Finance, September 2024, accessed: 01/03/2025. [Online]. Available: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/stablec oins-increasingly-used-savings-p...

    2024

  52. [60]

    Are the stabilities of stablecoins connected?

    B. N. Thanh, T. N. V . Hong, H. Pham, T. N. Cong, and T. P . T. Anh, “Are the stabilities of stablecoins connected?”Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 515–525, 2023

    2023

  53. [61]

    Central bank digital currency competition and the impossible trinity,

    S. Karau, “Central bank digital currency competition and the impossible trinity,”Finance Research Letters, vol. 54, p. 103723, 2023

    2023

  54. [62]

    Digital currencies in financial networks,

    O. Castr´en, I. K. Kavonius, and M. Rancan, “Digital currencies in financial networks,”Journal of Financial Stability, vol. 60, p. 101000, 2022

    2022

  55. [63]

    A modern reincarnation of mundell-fleming’s trilemma,

    J. Aizenman, “A modern reincarnation of mundell-fleming’s trilemma,”Economic Modelling, vol. 81, pp. 444–454, 2019

    2019

  56. [64]

    Stablecoins: Legal restrictions theory and monetary policy,

    J. Park and O. Kwon, “Stablecoins: Legal restrictions theory and monetary policy,”Economics Letters, vol. 226, p. 111107, 2023

    2023

  57. [65]

    Characteristics of proliferating cryptocurrencies: a comparative study between stable and non-stable cryptocurrencies,

    C. H. Au, G. Li, W.-S. Hsu, P .-H. Shieh, and K. M. Law, “Characteristics of proliferating cryptocurrencies: a comparative study between stable and non-stable cryptocurrencies,” Enterprise Information Systems, p. 2356771, 2024

    2024

  58. [66]

    A unified framework for monetary theory and policy analysis,

    R. Lagos and R. Wright, “A unified framework for monetary theory and policy analysis,”Journal of political Economy, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 463–484, 2005

    2005

  59. [67]

    Revealing stablecoin successes: Lessons from a case study on usdt,

    W. S. Hsu and C. H. Au, “Revealing stablecoin successes: Lessons from a case study on usdt,” inProceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB), 2023

    2023

  60. [68]

    How to win the race? determining the success factors for stablecoins,

    K. Włosik, B.Łet, K. Soba´nski, and W .´Swider, “How to win the race? determining the success factors for stablecoins,”Ap- plied Economics Letters, vol. 31, no. 19, pp. 2042–2053, 2024

    2024

  61. [69]

    The quest for cbdc: indentifying and prioritising the motivations for launching central bank digital currencies in emerging countries,

    S. Singh, S. Gupta, S. Kaur, S. Sapra, V . Kumar, and M. Sharma, “The quest for cbdc: indentifying and prioritising the motivations for launching central bank digital currencies in emerging countries,”Quality & Quantity, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 4493–4508, 2023

    2023

  62. [70]

    Consumer choices under new payment methods,

    J. Son, M. H. Bilgin, and D. Ryu, “Consumer choices under new payment methods,”Financial Innovation, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 82, 2022

    2022

  63. [71]

    Investigating the state of blockchain adoption in the south african finance industry,

    I.-E. Adams, J.-P . V an Belle, and G. Oosterwyk, “Investigating the state of blockchain adoption in the south african finance industry,” in2023 18th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and T echnologies (CISTI). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  64. [72]

    Identification and prioritization of the risks in the mass adoption of artificial intelligence-driven stable coins: The quest for optimal resource utilization,

    K. Sood, S. Singh, A. Behl, R. Sindhwani, S. Kaur, and V . Pereira, “Identification and prioritization of the risks in the mass adoption of artificial intelligence-driven stable coins: The quest for optimal resource utilization,”Resources P olicy, vol. 81, p. 103235, 2023

    2023

  65. [73]

    Global demand for basket-backed stablecoins,

    G. Baughman and J. Flemming, “Global demand for basket-backed stablecoins,”Review of Economic Dynamics, vol. 48, pp. 244–264, 2023

    2023

  66. [74]

    Can stablecoins foster cryptocurrencies adoption?

    C. H. Au, W . S. Hsu, P . H. Shieh, and L. Y ue, “Can stablecoins foster cryptocurrencies adoption?” Journal of Computer Information Systems, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 360–369, 2024

    2024

  67. [75]

    Speculative multipliers on defi: Quantifying on-chain leverage risks,

    Z. Wang, K. Qin, D. V . Minh, and A. Gervais, “Speculative multipliers on defi: Quantifying on-chain leverage risks,” in International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, 2022, pp. 38–56

    2022

  68. [76]

    Debt-financed collateral and stability risks in the defi ecosystem,

    M. Darlin, G. Palaiokrassas, and L. Tassiulas, “Debt-financed collateral and stability risks in the defi ecosystem,” in2022 4th Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innova- tive Networks and Services (BRAINS). IEEE, 2022, pp. 5–12

    2022

  69. [77]

    Tether: A study on bubble-networks,

    G. Rosa and R. Pareschi, “Tether: A study on bubble-networks,” Frontiers in Blockchain, vol. 4, p. 686484, 2021

    2021

  70. [78]

    Contagion in decentralized lending protocols: A case study of compound,

    N. Tovanich, M. Kassoul, S. Weidenholzer, and J. Prat, “Contagion in decentralized lending protocols: A case study of compound,” in Proceedings of the 2023 W orkshop on Decentralized Finance and Security, 2023, pp. 55–63

    2023

  71. [79]

    Cryptocurrency rewards and crowdsourcing task success,

    S. Meng, X. Zhao, and X. Zhao, “Cryptocurrency rewards and crowdsourcing task success,” inProceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2023

    2023

  72. [80]

    Profiling turkish cryptocurrency owners: payment users, crypto investors and crypto traders,

    L. Ante, F. Fiedler, F. Steinmetz, and I. Fiedler, “Profiling turkish cryptocurrency owners: payment users, crypto investors and crypto traders,”Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 16, no. 4, p. 239, 2023

    2023

  73. [81]

    Blockchain adoption in retail operations: Stablecoins and traceability,

    K. Zhang, T.-M. Choi, S.-H. Chung, Y . Dai, and X. Wen, “Blockchain adoption in retail operations: Stablecoins and traceability,”European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 315, no. 1, pp. 147–160, 2024

    2024

  74. [82]

    The way to implement cryptocurrency for international payments and remittances,

    R. Khan, N. Dhaliwal, R. Deorari, P . Anoosha, A. Hussein, and M. B. Alazzam, “The way to implement cryptocurrency for international payments and remittances,” in 2023 3rd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative T echnologies in Engineering (ICACITE). IEEE...

    2023

  75. [83]

    Telco tokenization and stablecoin development an industry opportunity,

    S. Bhat and M. J. Morrow, “Telco tokenization and stablecoin development an industry opportunity,” in 2022 IEEE 1st Global Emerging T echnology Blockchain F orum: Blockchain & Beyond (iGETblockchain). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–6

    2022

  76. [84]

    Conceptual framework for the adoption of stablecoins (usdt/busd) for construction payments,

    M. Ayuba Musa and T. Akanbi, “Conceptual framework for the adoption of stablecoins (usdt/busd) for construction payments,” in EC3 Conference 2022, vol. 3. European Council on Computing in Construction, 2022, pp. 0–0

    2022

  77. [85]

    On the stability of stablecoins,

    K. Grobys, J. Junttila, J. W. Kolari, and N. Sapkota, “On the stability of stablecoins,”Journal of Empirical Finance, vol. 64, pp. 207–223, 2021

    2021

  78. [86]

    Stablecoins: New perspectives for travel and tourism,

    V . Manahov and M. Li, “Stablecoins: New perspectives for travel and tourism,”Annals of T ourism Research, vol. 107, p. 103789, 2024

    2024

  79. [87]

    How stable are stablecoins?

    L. T. Hoang and D. G. Baur, “How stable are stablecoins?” The European Journal of Finance, pp. 1–17, 2021

    2021

  80. [88]

    Understand volatility of algorithmic stablecoin: Modeling, verification and empirical analysis,

    W. Zhao, H. Li, and Y . Y uan, “Understand volatility of algorithmic stablecoin: Modeling, verification and empirical analysis,” inFinancial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 32 2021 International W orkshops: CoDecFin, DeFi, VOTING, and WTSC, V irtual Event, March 5, 2021, Re...

    2021

  81. [89]

    Extremely stablecoins,

    J. Fernandez-Mejia, “Extremely stablecoins,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 63, p. 105268, 2024

    2024

  82. [90]

    The instability of stablecoins,

    K. Duan and A. Urquhart, “The instability of stablecoins,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 52, p. 103573, 2023

    2023

  83. [91]

    Computer science abstractions to help reason about decentralized stablecoin design,

    B. Charoenwong, R. M. Kirby, and J. Reiter, “Computer science abstractions to help reason about decentralized stablecoin design,”IEEE Access, 2023

    2023

  84. [92]

    The isotropy of cryptocurrency volatility,

    A. Hairudin and A. Mohamad, “The isotropy of cryptocurrency volatility,”International Journal of Finance & Economics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 3779–3810, 2024

    2024

  85. [93]

    Analysis of stablecoins during the global covid-19 pandemic,

    C. Jeger, B. Rodrigues, E. Scheid, and B. Stiller, “Analysis of stablecoins during the global covid-19 pandemic,” in2020 Second International Conference on Blockchain Computing and Applications (BCCA). IEEE, 2020, pp. 30–37

    2020

  86. [94]

    “shiny” crypto assets: A systemic look at gold-backed cryptocurrencies during the covid-19 pandemic,

    A. Jalan, R. Matkovskyy, and L. Y arovaya, ““shiny” crypto assets: A systemic look at gold-backed cryptocurrencies during the covid-19 pandemic,”International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 78, p. 101958, 2021

    2021

  87. [95]

    A fractal theory of investor demand for cryptocurrencies,

    A. Hairudin and A. Mohamad, “A fractal theory of investor demand for cryptocurrencies,”Applied Economics Letters, pp. 1–7, 2024

    2024

  88. [96]

    Intelligent design: stablecoins (in) stability and collateral during market turbulence,

    R. De Blasis, L. Galati, A. Webb, and R. I. Webb, “Intelligent design: stablecoins (in) stability and collateral during market turbulence,”Financial Innovation, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 85, 2023

    2023

  89. [97]

    Long memory and structural breaks of cryptocurrencies trading volume,

    M. S. Ahmed and E. Bouri, “Long memory and structural breaks of cryptocurrencies trading volume,” Eurasian Economic Review, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 469–497, 2023

    2023

  90. [98]

    Asset flow and momentum: Deterministic and stochastic equations,

    G. Caginalp and D. Balenovich, “Asset flow and momentum: Deterministic and stochastic equations,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 357, no. 1758, pp. 2119–2133, 1999

    1999

  91. [99]

    Daisim: A computational simulator for the makerdao stablecoin,

    S. Bhat, A. B. Kahya, B. Krishnamachari, and R. Kumar, “Daisim: A computational simulator for the makerdao stablecoin,” in4th International Symposium on F oundations and Applications of Blockchain 2021 (F AB 2021). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum f¨ur Informatik, 2021

    2021

  92. [100]

    Simulating the makerdao stablecoin,

    S. Bhat, A. Kahya, R. Kumar, and B. Krishnamachari, “Simulating the makerdao stablecoin,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC). IEEE, 2021, pp. 1–2

    2021

  93. [101]

    Scaled muth–arma process applied to finance market,

    A. D. Nascimento, M. C. Lima, H. Bakouch, and N. Qarmalah, “Scaled muth–arma process applied to finance market,” Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 8, p. 1908, 2023

    1908

  94. [102]

    Time-varying coefficient dar model and stability measures for stablecoin prices: An application to tether,

    A. Djogbenou, E. Inan, and J. Jasiak, “Time-varying coefficient dar model and stability measures for stablecoin prices: An application to tether,”Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 139, p. 102946, 2023

    2023

  95. [103]

    Forecast of the optimal activation function for the stablecoins using neural network,

    A. E. B. Gasca, R. T. Mendoza, and J. Nosedal-Sanchez, “Forecast of the optimal activation function for the stablecoins using neural network,” in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Modelling and Applied Simulation (MAS 2021). Coyoac ´an, Ciudad de M´exico, M´e...

    2021 doi

  96. [104]

    Forecasting cryptocurrencies’ price with the financial stress index: a graph neural network prediction strategy,

    W. Yin, Z. Chen, X. Luo, and B. Kirkulak-Uludag, “Forecasting cryptocurrencies’ price with the financial stress index: a graph neural network prediction strategy,”Applied Economics Letters, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 630–639, 2024

    2024

  97. [105]

    Libra or librae? basket based stablecoins to mitigate foreign exchange volatility spillovers,

    P . Giudici, T. Leach, and P . Pagnottoni, “Libra or librae? basket based stablecoins to mitigate foreign exchange volatility spillovers,”Finance Research Letters, vol. 44, p. 102054, 2022

    2022

  98. [106]

    The symmetric and asymmetric algorithmic trading strategies for the stablecoins,

    M. Ba˘gcı, P . Kaya Soylu, and S. Kıran, “The symmetric and asymmetric algorithmic trading strategies for the stablecoins,” Computational Economics, pp. 1–22, 2024

    2024

  99. [107]

    Gemcash—towards a diamond redeemable stable-growth coin,

    E. Bandara, D. Diamante, S. Saltzman, R. Richards, S. Shetty, R. Mukkamala, X. Liang, and A. Rahman, “Gemcash—towards a diamond redeemable stable-growth coin,” in2022 International Conference on Cyber-Physical Social Intelligence (ICCSI). IEEE, 2022, pp. 104–109

    2022

  100. [108]

    Toward greater stability in stablecoins: Empirical evidence from an analysis of precious metals,

    A. Asadov, R. Yildirim, and M. Masih, “Toward greater stability in stablecoins: Empirical evidence from an analysis of precious metals,”Borsa Istanbul Review, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1152–1172, 2023

    2023

  101. [109]

    Elasticoin: Low-volatility cryptocurrency with proofs of sequential work,

    Y . Dong and R. Boutaba, “Elasticoin: Low-volatility cryptocurrency with proofs of sequential work,” in2019 ieee international conference on blockchain and cryptocurrency (icbc). IEEE, 2019, pp. 205–209

    2019

  102. [110]

    A new digital-currency model based on certificates,

    W.-T. Tsai, W. Xiang, S. Wang, and E. Deng, “A new digital-currency model based on certificates,” inInternational Conference on Smart Computing and Communication . Springer, 2022, pp. 23–34

    2022

  103. [111]

    On creation of a stablecoin based on the morini’s scheme of inv&sav wallets and antimoney,

    H. T. Heinonen, “On creation of a stablecoin based on the morini’s scheme of inv&sav wallets and antimoney,” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain). IEEE, 2021, pp. 409–416

    2021

  104. [112]

    Currency stability using blockchain technology,

    B. Routledge and A. Zetlin-Jones, “Currency stability using blockchain technology,”Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 142, p. 104155, 2022

    2022

  105. [113]

    Djed: A formally verified crypto-backed autonomous stablecoin protocol,

    J. Zahnentferner, D. Kaidalov, J.-F. Etienne, and J. D´ıaz, “Djed: A formally verified crypto-backed autonomous stablecoin protocol,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–9

    2023

  106. [114]

    Frax: A fractional-algorithmic stablecoin protocol,

    S. Kazemian, J. Huan, J. Shomroni, and K. Iyer, “Frax: A fractional-algorithmic stablecoin protocol,” in2022 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain). IEEE, 2022, pp. 406–411

    2022

  107. [115]

    Red-black coins: Dai without liquidations,

    M. Salehi, J. Clark, and M. Mannan, “Red-black coins: Dai without liquidations,” inFinancial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2021 International W orkshops: CoDecFin, DeFi, VOTING, and WTSC, V irtual Event, March 5, 2021, Revised Selected P apers 25. Springer, 2021, pp. 136–145

    2021

  108. [116]

    Incentivized third party collateralization for stablecoins,

    S. Das and R. V enkataraman, “Incentivized third party collateralization for stablecoins,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11521, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Mover: stabilize decentralized finance system with practical risk management,

    Q. Liu, L. Y u, and C. Jia, “Mover: stabilize decentralized finance system with practical risk management,” in2020 2nd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innova- tive Networks and Services (BRAINS). IEEE, 2020, pp. 55–56

    2020

  110. [118]

    Enhancing economic security in blockchain-based spectrum trading: A stablecoin approach,

    H. Zhang and Y . Zhao, “Enhancing economic security in blockchain-based spectrum trading: A stablecoin approach,” in 2023 9th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC). IEEE, 2023, pp. 2503–2507

    2023

  111. [119]

    Implementing a retail cbdc: Lessons learned and key insights,

    R. Morales-Resendiz, J. Ponce, P . Picardo, A. V elasco, B. Chen, L. Sanz, G. Guiborg, B. Segendorff, J. L. V asquez, J. Arroyoet al., “Implementing a retail cbdc: Lessons learned and key insights,”Latin American Journal of Central Banking, 33 vol. 2, no. 1, p. 100022, 2021

    2021

  112. [120]

    Modern portfolio theory,

    H. Markowitz, “Modern portfolio theory,”Journal of Finance, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 77–91, 1952

    1952

  113. [121]

    Designing central bank digital currency for indonesia: the delphi–analytic network process,

    B. M. Zams, R. Indrastuti, A. G. Pangersa, N. A. Hasniawati, F. A. Zahra, and I. A. Fauziah, “Designing central bank digital currency for indonesia: the delphi–analytic network process,” Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 413–440, 2020

    2020

  114. [122]

    Blockchain application for central bank digital currencies (cbdc),

    V . Sethaput and S. Innet, “Blockchain application for central bank digital currencies (cbdc),”Cluster Computing, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2183–2197, 2023

    2023

  115. [123]

    Cbdc-mxn: Challenges and perspectives in the implementation as a mexican digital currency,

    J. N. Flores G´alvez and J. M. Mata Hern´andez, “Cbdc-mxn: Challenges and perspectives in the implementation as a mexican digital currency,”Mercados y negocios, vol. 24, no. 49, pp. 3–20, 2023

    2023

  116. [124]

    Hyperinflation, optimal currency scopes, and a cryptocurrency alternative to dollarization,

    J. E. Marthinsen and S. R. Gordon, “Hyperinflation, optimal currency scopes, and a cryptocurrency alternative to dollarization,”The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 85, pp. 161–173, 2022

    2022

  117. [125]

    A literature review on the design and implementation of central bank digital currencies,

    H. O. Genc and S. Takagi, “A literature review on the design and implementation of central bank digital currencies,” International Journal of Economic P olicy Studies, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 197–225, 2024

    2024

  118. [126]

    Design of a central bank digital currency in a highly dollarized emerging market economy: The case of cambodia,

    K. Ueda and C. Hay, “Design of a central bank digital currency in a highly dollarized emerging market economy: The case of cambodia,”Asian Economic P olicy Review, 2024

    2024

  119. [127]

    Tokenized index funds: A blockchain-based con- cept and a multidisciplinary research framework,

    R. F. Ciriello, “Tokenized index funds: A blockchain-based con- cept and a multidisciplinary research framework,”International Journal of Information Management, vol. 61, p. 102400, 2021

    2021

  120. [128]

    Privacy in payment in the age of central bank digital currency,

    F. Tronnier, “Privacy in payment in the age of central bank digital currency,” inPrivacy and Identity Management: 15th IFIP WG 9.2, 9.6/11.7, 11.6/SIG 9.2. 2 International Summer School, Maribor , Slovenia, September 21–23, 2020, Revised Selected P apers 15. Springer, 2021, pp. 96–114

    2020

  121. [129]

    Ar- chitecture for stablecoins with cross-chain interoperability,

    E. B. C. Machado, J. de Melo Bezerra, and C. M. Hirata, “Ar- chitecture for stablecoins with cross-chain interoperability,” in Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2024) - V olume 1. SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publi...

    2024

  122. [130]

    A utxo-based sharding method for stablecoin,

    S. Y . Jin, B. T. Xu, P . Intallura, and Y . Xia, “A utxo-based sharding method for stablecoin,” in2022 F ourth International Conference on Blockchain Computing and Applications (BCCA). IEEE, 2022, pp. 195–199

    2022

  123. [131]

    Resilience of stablecoin reserve for distributed energy trading,

    M. E. Islam, M. Chetty, S. Lim, M. Chadhar, and S. Islam, “Resilience of stablecoin reserve for distributed energy trading,” in 2022 IEEE PES 14th Asia-P acific P ower and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC). IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–6

    2022

  124. [132]

    Pioneering a new era of global transactions: Decentralized overseas transactions on the blockchain,

    K. Dudekula and P . K. Annapurani, “Pioneering a new era of global transactions: Decentralized overseas transactions on the blockchain,” inInternational Conference on Micro-Electronics and T elecommunication Engineering. Springer, 2023, pp. 161–171

    2023

  125. [133]

    Stablecoins and cen- tral bank digital currencies: policy and regulatory challenges,

    B. Eichengreen and G. Viswanath-Natraj, “Stablecoins and cen- tral bank digital currencies: policy and regulatory challenges,” Asian Economic P apers, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 29–46, 2022

    2022

  126. [134]

    Reflexer finance,

    GEB Foundation, “Reflexer finance,” 2024, accessed: 01/03/2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.reflexer.finance/

    2024

  127. [135]

    Stablecoins: Does design affect stability?

    G. Gadzinski, A. Castello, and F. Mazzorana, “Stablecoins: Does design affect stability?” Finance Research Letters, vol. 53, p. 103611, 2023

    2023

  128. [136]

    Empirical evaluation of makerdao’s resilience,

    M. Kj¨aer, M. Di Angelo, and G. Salzer, “Empirical evaluation of makerdao’s resilience,” in 2021 3rd Conference on Blockchain Research & Applications for Innovative Networks and Services (BRAINS). IEEE, 2021, pp. 193–200

    2021

  129. [137]

    Does the design of stablecoins impact their volatility?

    K. Jarno and H. Kołodziejczyk, “Does the design of stablecoins impact their volatility?” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 42, 2021

    2021

  130. [138]

    Are stable cryptocurrencies exempted from impossible trinity?

    D. Koutsoupakis, “Are stable cryptocurrencies exempted from impossible trinity?”Journal of Economic Studies, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1480–1496, 2020

    2020

  131. [139]

    Task manage- ment in decentralized autonomous organization,

    X. Zhao, P . Ai, F. Lai, X. Luo, and J. Benitez, “Task manage- ment in decentralized autonomous organization,”Journal of Operations Management, vol. 68, no. 6-7, pp. 649–674, 2022

    2022

  132. [140]

    What keeps stablecoins stable?

    R. K. Lyons and G. Viswanath-Natraj, “What keeps stablecoins stable?”Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 131, p. 102777, 2023

    2023

  133. [141]

    Fundamentals of the makerdao governance token,

    R. Kozhan and G. Viswanath-Natraj, “Fundamentals of the makerdao governance token,” in3rd International Conference on Blockchain Economics, Security and Protocols (T okenomics 2021). Schloss-Dagstuhl-Leibniz Zentrum f ¨ur Informatik, 2022

    2021

  134. [142]

    Decentralization illusion in decentralized finance: Evidence from tokenized voting in makerdao polls,

    X. Sun, C. Stasinakis, and G. Sermpinis, “Decentralization illusion in decentralized finance: Evidence from tokenized voting in makerdao polls,”Journal of Financial Stability, p. 101286, 2024

    2024

  135. [143]

    Ledger to ledger: off-and on-chain auditing of stablecoin

    R. Moura de Carvalho, H. Coelho In ´acio, and R. P . Figueiredo Marques, “Ledger to ledger: off-and on-chain auditing of stablecoin.” International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, vol. 22, 2022

    2022

  136. [144]

    Emergent outcomes of the vetoken model,

    T. Lloyd, D. O’Broin, and M. Harrigan, “Emergent outcomes of the vetoken model,” in2023 IEEE international conference on omni-layer intelligent systems (COINS). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  137. [145]

    Auditing decentralized finance,

    S. M. Bhambhwani and A. H. Huang, “Auditing decentralized finance,”The British Accounting Review, vol. 56, no. 2, p. 101270, 2024

    2024

  138. [146]

    The asset-backing risk of stablecoin trading: The case of tether,

    F. J. J. Fern´andez, M. ´A. E. Fern´andez, and S. L. N. Alonso, “The asset-backing risk of stablecoin trading: The case of tether,”Economics and Business Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 57–80, 2024

    2024

  139. [147]

    A token economics explanation for the de-pegging of the algorithmic stablecoin: Analysis of the case of terra,

    J. Cho, “A token economics explanation for the de-pegging of the algorithmic stablecoin: Analysis of the case of terra,” Ledger, vol. 8, 2023

    2023

  140. [148]

    Anatomy of a stablecoin’s failure: The terra-luna case,

    A. Briola, D. Vidal-Tom´as, Y . Wang, and T. Aste, “Anatomy of a stablecoin’s failure: The terra-luna case,”Finance Research Letters, vol. 51, p. 103358, 2023

    2023

  141. [149]

    While stability lasts: A stochastic model of noncustodial stablecoins,

    A. Klages-Mundt and A. Minca, “While stability lasts: A stochastic model of noncustodial stablecoins,”Mathematical Finance, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 943–981, 2022

    2022

  142. [150]

    Digital money creation and algorithmic stablecoin run,

    K. Saengchote and K. Samphantharak, “Digital money creation and algorithmic stablecoin run,”Finance Research Letters, vol. 64, p. 105435, 2024

    2024

  143. [151]

    Dissecting the terra-luna crash: Evidence from the spillover effect and information flow,

    S. Lee, J. Lee, and Y . Lee, “Dissecting the terra-luna crash: Evidence from the spillover effect and information flow,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 53, p. 103590, 2023

    2023

  144. [152]

    Disentangling decentralized finance (defi) compositions,

    S. Kitzler, F. Victor, P . Saggese, and B. Haslhofer, “Disentangling decentralized finance (defi) compositions,” ACM Transactions on the W eb, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 1–26, 2023

    2023

  145. [153]

    Cryptocurrency turmoil: Unraveling the collapse of a unified stablecoin (ustc) through twitter as a passive sensor,

    ——, “Cryptocurrency turmoil: Unraveling the collapse of a unified stablecoin (ustc) through twitter as a passive sensor,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 4, p. 1270, 2024

    2024

  146. [154]

    On using twitter to understand the stablecoin terra collapse,

    S. Ferretti and M. Furini, “On using twitter to understand the stablecoin terra collapse,” inProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Information T echnology for Social Good, 2023, pp. 16–22

    2023

  147. [155]

    Fintwitbert: A specialized language model for financial tweets,

    T. K. Stephan Akkerman, “Fintwitbert: A specialized language model for financial tweets,” https://github.com/TimKoornstra/FinTwitBERT, 2023

    2023

  148. [156]

    The role of emojis in sentiment analysis of financial microblogs,

    A. Mahrous, J. Schneider, and R. Di Pietro, “The role of emojis in sentiment analysis of financial microblogs,” in2023 F ourth 34 International Conference on Intelligent Data Science T echnolo- gies and Applications (IDSTA). IEEE, 2023, pp. 76–84

    2023

  149. [157]

    P . Mell, P . Mell, and D. Y aga,Understanding stablecoin technology and related security considerations . US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2023

    2023

  150. [158]

    Blockchain cbdc security threats using stride,

    J. Hans, S. Khan, and D. Svetinovic, “Blockchain cbdc security threats using stride,” in2023 Fifth International Conference on Blockchain Computing and Applications (BCCA). IEEE, 2023, pp. 522–529

    2023

  151. [159]

    Data depth and core-based trend detection on blockchain transaction networks,

    J. Zhu, A. Khan, and C. G. Akcora, “Data depth and core-based trend detection on blockchain transaction networks,” Frontiers in Blockchain, vol. 7, p. 1342956, 2024

    2024

  152. [160]

    Stride- based threat modeling for cyber-physical systems,

    R. Khan, K. McLaughlin, D. Laverty, and S. Sezer, “Stride- based threat modeling for cyber-physical systems,” in2017 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid T echnologies Conference Europe (ISGT -Europe). IEEE, 2017, pp. 1–6

    2017

  153. [161]

    An insight into nfts, stablecoins and dexs in blockchain,

    C. Jayapal, M. Jananiet al., “An insight into nfts, stablecoins and dexs in blockchain,” in2023 2nd International Conference on Advancements in Electrical, Electronics, Communication, Computing and Automation (ICAECA). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  154. [162]

    What drives cryptocurrency pump and dump schemes: Coin versus market factors?

    L. Charfeddine and A. Mahrous, “What drives cryptocurrency pump and dump schemes: Coin versus market factors?” Finance Research Letters, vol. 67, p. 105861, 2024

    2024

  155. [163]

    A global stablecoin: Revolutionary reserve asset or reinventing the wheel?

    R. Copeland, “A global stablecoin: Revolutionary reserve asset or reinventing the wheel?”Journal of P ayments Strategy & Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 310–321, 2020

    2020

  156. [164]

    The properties of contemporary money,

    I. Hull and O. Sattath, “The properties of contemporary money,”Journal of Economic Surveys, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1132–1155, 2024

    2024

  157. [165]

    Getting the balance right: Crypto, stablecoin and central bank digital currency,

    W . Bolt, V . Lubbersen, and P . Wierts, “Getting the balance right: Crypto, stablecoin and central bank digital currency,”Journal of P ayments Strategy & Systems, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2022

    2022

  158. [166]

    The rise of digital money,

    T. Adrian and T. Mancini-Griffoli, “The rise of digital money,” Annual Review of Financial Economics, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 57–77, 2021

    2021

  159. [167]

    Central bank digital currencies: a proper reaction to private digital money?

    S. Cesaratto and E. Febrero, “Central bank digital currencies: a proper reaction to private digital money?”Review of Keynesian Economics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 529–553, 2023

    2023

  160. [168]

    The economic law of (central bank) digital currency,

    F. Zatti, “The economic law of (central bank) digital currency,” Law and Financial Markets Review , vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 253–265, 2022

    2022

  161. [169]

    Fintech, cryptocurrencies, and cbdc: Financial structural transformation in china,

    F. Allen, X. Gu, and J. Jagtiani, “Fintech, cryptocurrencies, and cbdc: Financial structural transformation in china,”Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 124, p. 102625, 2022

    2022

  162. [170]

    Central bank digital currency: Financial system implications and control,

    U. Bindseil, “Central bank digital currency: Financial system implications and control,”International Journal of P olitical Economy, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 303–335, 2019

    2019

  163. [171]

    The potential impacts and risks of global stablecoins,

    C. Li and Y . Shen, “The potential impacts and risks of global stablecoins,”China Economic Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 39–51, 2021

    2021

  164. [172]

    The coming central bank digital currency revolution and the e-cny,

    H. Wang and R. Buckley, “The coming central bank digital currency revolution and the e-cny,”Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 145–172, 2023

    2023

  165. [173]

    The global findex database 2021: Financial inclusion, digital payments, and resilience in the age of covid-19,

    World Bank, “The global findex database 2021: Financial inclusion, digital payments, and resilience in the age of covid-19,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/globalfindex

    2021

  166. [174]

    How will digital technologies influence the international monetary system?

    E. Prasad, “How will digital technologies influence the international monetary system?”Oxford Review of Economic P olicy, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 389–397, 2023

    2023

  167. [175]

    Central bank digital currency in historical perspective: Another crossroad in monetary history,

    M. D. Bordo, “Central bank digital currency in historical perspective: Another crossroad in monetary history,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Tech. Rep., 2021

    2021

  168. [176]

    Digital currencies and monetary policy in the new era,

    B. Bagis, “Digital currencies and monetary policy in the new era,”Insight Turkey, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 189–212, 2022

    2022

  169. [177]

    The changing concept of money: a threat to the monetary system or an opportunity for the financial sector?

    C. Hofmann, “The changing concept of money: a threat to the monetary system or an opportunity for the financial sector?” European Business Organization Law Review, vol. 21, pp. 37–68, 2020

    2020

  170. [178]

    Systemic stablecoin and the defensive case for central bank digital currency: A critique of the bank of england’s framing,

    J. Morgan, “Systemic stablecoin and the defensive case for central bank digital currency: A critique of the bank of england’s framing,”Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 62, p. 101716, 2022

    2022

  171. [179]

    Stablecoins, central bank digital currencies and us dollar hegemony: The geopolitical stake of innovations in money and payments,

    L. Fantacci and L. Gobbi, “Stablecoins, central bank digital currencies and us dollar hegemony: The geopolitical stake of innovations in money and payments,”Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 173–200, 2024

    2024

  172. [180]

    Democratizing money? the role of cryptocurrencies,

    J. Temperini and M. Corsi, “Democratizing money? the role of cryptocurrencies,”PSL Quarterly Review, vol. 76, no. 304, pp. 51–66, 2023

    2023

  173. [181]

    Regulating global stablecoins: A model-law strategy,

    S. L. Schwarcz, “Regulating global stablecoins: A model-law strategy,”V and. L. Rev ., vol. 75, p. 1729, 2022

    2022

  174. [182]

    So far, central bank digital currencies have failed,

    K. Dowd, “So far, central bank digital currencies have failed,” Economic Affairs, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 71–94, 2024

    2024

  175. [183]

    The curious case of stablecoins-balancing risks and rewards?

    A. Ferreira, “The curious case of stablecoins-balancing risks and rewards?”Journal of International Economic Law, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 755–778, 2021

    2021

  176. [184]

    Stablecoin- based digital trading and investment platforms and their potential in overcoming sanctions restrictions,

    E. V . Travkina, A. B. Fiapshev, and M. T. Belova, “Stablecoin- based digital trading and investment platforms and their potential in overcoming sanctions restrictions,”Economies, vol. 10, no. 10, p. 246, 2022

    2022

  177. [185]

    Stable crypto-assets for payments: What is missing in current token standards?

    C. Fern´andez Herraiz and´I. G. De Mata, “Stable crypto-assets for payments: What is missing in current token standards?” Journal of P ayments Strategy & Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 380–391, 2020

    2020

  178. [186]

    On the legislation prospective for consumer protection of stablecoin,

    Z. Shi, W. He, and J. Liu, “On the legislation prospective for consumer protection of stablecoin,” in2021 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain). IEEE, 2021, pp. 205–212

    2021

  179. [187]

    The international hierarchy of money in cross- border payment systems: Developing countries’ regulation for central bank digital currencies and facebook’s stablecoin,

    A. Arauz, “The international hierarchy of money in cross- border payment systems: Developing countries’ regulation for central bank digital currencies and facebook’s stablecoin,” International Journal of P olitical Economy, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 226–243, 2021

    2021

  180. [188]

    Can fiat-backed stablecoins be considered cash or cash equivalents under international financial reporting standards rules?

    F. Hampl and L. Gy¨ony¨orov´a, “Can fiat-backed stablecoins be considered cash or cash equivalents under international financial reporting standards rules?”Australian Accounting Review, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 233–255, 2021

    2021

  181. [189]

    Libra project: regulators act on global stablecoins,

    O. Read and S. Sch¨afer, “Libra project: regulators act on global stablecoins,”Intereconomics, vol. 55, pp. 392–398, 2020

    2020

  182. [190]

    Regulating libra,

    D. A. Zetzsche, R. P . Buckley, and D. W. Arner, “Regulating libra,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 80–113, 2021

    2021

  183. [191]

    Ligon and S

    C. Ligon and S. Malwa, “Defi platform acala’s stablecoin falls 99

  184. [192]

    Soundness of stablecoins,

    Y . Ikeno, J. Angel, and S. Panigrahi, “Soundness of stablecoins,” in International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security. Springer, 2022, pp. 66–73

    2022

  185. [193]

    Basis stablecoin confirms shutdown, blaming ’regulatory constraints’,

    B. Dale, “Basis stablecoin confirms shutdown, blaming ’regulatory constraints’,” December 2018, accessed: 01/03/2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2018/12/13/basis-stabl ecoin-confirms-shutdown-blaming-regulatory-constraints/

    2018

  186. [194]

    Hack analysis: Beanstalk governance attack, april 2022,

    Immunefi, “Hack analysis: Beanstalk governance attack, april 2022,” January 2023, accessed: 01/03/2025. [Online]. 35 Available: https://medium.com/immunefi/hack-analysis-b eanstalk-governance-attack-april-2022-f42788fc821e

    2022

  187. [195]

    Coingecko: Cryptocurrency data platform,

    CoinGecko, “Coingecko: Cryptocurrency data platform,” https://www.coingecko.com, 2024, accessed: 01/03/2025

    2024

  188. [196]

    Roles of stable versus nonstable cryptocurrencies in bitcoin market dynamics,

    B. Hatem, J. El Ouakdi, and Z. Ftiti, “Roles of stable versus nonstable cryptocurrencies in bitcoin market dynamics,” Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 62, p. 101720, 2022

    2022

  189. [197]

    Binance api documentation,

    Binance, “Binance api documentation,” https://binance-doc s.github.io/apidocs/spot/en/, 2024, accessed: 01/03/2025

    2024

  190. [198]

    Coinmarketcap: Cryptocurrency market capitalizations,

    CoinMarketCap, “Coinmarketcap: Cryptocurrency market capitalizations,” https://coinmarketcap.com, 2024, accessed: 01/03/2025

    2024

  191. [199]

    Spillovers between the islamic gold-backed cryptocurrencies and equity markets during the covid-19: A sectorial analysis,

    I. Y ousaf and L. Y arovaya, “Spillovers between the islamic gold-backed cryptocurrencies and equity markets during the covid-19: A sectorial analysis,”P acific-Basin Finance Journal, vol. 71, p. 101705, 2022

    2022

  192. [200]

    Coinbase api documentation,

    Coinbase, “Coinbase api documentation,” h t t p s : //docs.cdp.coinbase.com/exchange/docs/welcome, 2024, accessed: 01/03/2025

    2024

  193. [201]

    Is tether a safe haven of safe haven amid covid-19? an assessment against bitcoin and oil using improved measures of risk,

    K. Syuhada, A. Hakim, D. Suprijanto, I. Muchtadi-Alamsyah, and L. Arbi, “Is tether a safe haven of safe haven amid covid-19? an assessment against bitcoin and oil using improved measures of risk,”Resources P olicy, vol. 79, p. 103111, 2022

    2022

  194. [202]

    An examination of whether gold-backed islamic cryptocurrencies are safe havens for international islamic equity markets,

    F. Ali, E. Bouri, N. Naifar, S. J. H. Shahzad, and M. AlAhmad, “An examination of whether gold-backed islamic cryptocurrencies are safe havens for international islamic equity markets,”Research in International Business and Finance, vol. 63, p. 101768, 2022

    2022

  195. [203]

    Omni explorer,

    Omni Foundation, “Omni explorer,” https://omniexplorer.info, 2024

    2024

  196. [204]

    Etherscan: The ethereum blockchain explorer,

    Etherscan.io, “Etherscan: The ethereum blockchain explorer,” https://etherscan.io, 2024

    2024

  197. [205]

    Dune analytics,

    Dune Analytics, “Dune analytics,” https://dune.com, 2024

    2024

  198. [206]

    Tronscan: Blockchain explorer for the tron network,

    Tronscan.org, “Tronscan: Blockchain explorer for the tron network,” https://tronscan.org, 2024

    2024

  199. [207]

    Ethereum etl: Exporting the ethereum blockchain,

    Blockchain ETL, “Ethereum etl: Exporting the ethereum blockchain,” https://ethereum-etl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/go ogle-bigquery/, 2024

    2024

  200. [208]

    The graph protocol: Decentralized data querying for blockchain networks,

    The Graph Foundation, “The graph protocol: Decentralized data querying for blockchain networks,” https://thegraph.com, 2024

    2024

  201. [209]

    Analysis and patterns of unknown transactions in bitcoin,

    M. Caprolu, M. Pontecorvi, M. Signorini, C. Segarra, and R. Di Pietro, “Analysis and patterns of unknown transactions in bitcoin,” in2021 IEEE international conference on blockchain (Blockchain). IEEE, 2021, pp. 170–179

    2021

  202. [210]

    Chartalist repository: A dataset for cryptocur- rency market analysis,

    Chartalist Team, “Chartalist repository: A dataset for cryptocur- rency market analysis,” https://github.com/Chartalist/chartalist, 2024

    2024

  203. [211]

    Preferring stablecoin over dollar: Evidence from a survey of ethereum platform traders,

    F. Jin, J. Li, and Y . Xue, “Preferring stablecoin over dollar: Evidence from a survey of ethereum platform traders,”Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 131, p. 102796, 2023

    2023

  204. [212]

    Don’t trust, verify: The case of slash- ing from a popular ethereum explorer,

    Z. He, J. Li, and Z. Wu, “Don’t trust, verify: The case of slash- ing from a popular ethereum explorer,” inCompanion Proceed- ings of the ACM W eb Conference 2023, 2023, pp. 1078–1084

    2023

  205. [213]

    The effects of central bank digital currencies news on financial markets,

    Y . Wang, B. M. Lucey, S. A. Vigne, and L. Y arovaya, “The effects of central bank digital currencies news on financial markets,”T echnological F orecasting and Social Change, vol. 180, p. 121715, 2022

    2022

  206. [214]

    Twitter api changes set to disrupt public interest research,

    J. Hendrix, “Twitter api changes set to disrupt public interest research,” 2 2023, accessed: 01/03/2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.techpolicy.press/twitter-api-changes-set-to-d isrupt-public-interest-research/

    2023

  207. [2019]

    Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02152

    [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.02152

    1906 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.