Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 minor 1 cited by

Red Supergiants -- The Other Side of the H-R Diagram

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The most massive red supergiants may shed their outer layers in episodic eruptions, explaining the missing high-mass Type II-P supernovae.

desk verdict A reliable, readable review of red supergiant mass loss and evolution; the main synthesis is plausible but needs a quantitative check on cumulative mass loss. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15965 v1 pith:Q5STNBQ7 submitted 2025-07-21 astro-ph.SR

Roberta M. Humphreys This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords redsupergiantshypergiantsmasslossepisodicsupergiantproblempost-red-supergiantevolutionHumphreys-DavidsonlimitTypeII-Psupernovae
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the most massive red supergiants are not quietly losing mass in a steady wind but are shedding their outer envelopes in episodic, eruption-like events driven by activity in their convective surfaces and magnetic fields. The author connects this episodic mass loss to the long-standing 'red supergiant problem': the observed absence of high-mass Type II-P supernova progenitors. If the most massive red supergiants lose enough mass, their cores can reach a critical mass and drive them back to warmer temperatures as yellow hypergiants, so they would explode later as a different kind of supernova or collapse quietly. The paper is a synthesis of observed properties—surface asymmetries, outflows, knots, masers, and light curves—that together point to a late, violent phase of mass loss that reshapes the final stages of massive stars.

What carries the argument

The mechanism carrying the argument is large-scale surface activity in red supergiants: convection-driven hot spots and asymmetries, seen directly with near-infrared interferometry, that are coupled to magnetic fields and produce massive directed outflows or 'outbursts.' These episodic outflows, traced by knots and clumps in the circumstellar ejecta and by dimming events in the light curves, provide the extra mass loss needed to explain the high rates and to connect them to post-red-supergiant evolution through Maeder's critical-core condition. The paper also leans on the Humphreys–Davidson limit as the empirical boundary that defines which masses can become red supergiants at all.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the gas-to-dust ratio in the ejecta of several luminous red supergiants (for example, from CO or HI line emission compared with the dust spectral energy distribution) that returns values far outside 100–200 would revise the derived mass loss rates and test the episodic-mass-loss scenario. Alternatively, confirmation that a star with initial mass above about 20 solar masses exploded as a normal Type II-P supernova without a preceding dimming event or yellow-hypergiant phase would break the proposed link.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that the high mass loss rates measured for the most luminous red supergiants, often exceeding $10^{-4}$ solar masses per year, are produced by episodic massive outflows from active surface regions rather than by steady radiation pressure or pulsation alone. Interferometric images reveal large, variable surface asymmetries on stars like Betelgeuse and AZ Cyg, while the ejecta of the extreme red supergiants VY CMa and VX Sgr contain massive knots and clumps consistent with directed outflows, some comparable to coronal mass ejections with magnetic fields. The author argues that this episodic mass loss can remove enough of the hydrogen envelope so that the core reaches about two-thirds of the total mass, triggering a transition back to warmer temperatures—a post-red-supergiant phase seen in yellow hypergiants like IRC+10420. In this picture, the missing high-mass Type II-P progenitors are not necessarily missing progenitors at all; they are stars that have left the red supergiant stage before exploding, or that collapse directly to a black hole.

Load-bearing premise

The mass loss rates that anchor the high-mass-loss conclusion are derived from dust emission assuming a gas-to-dust ratio between 100 and 200 and assumed grain properties; if the true ratio lies outside that range, the rates and the chain from episodic mass loss to post-red-supergiant evolution would weaken.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Type II-P supernova progenitor surveys should find few or no stars above about 17–20 $M_\odot$, because those stars have already shed their envelopes or moved to warmer states.
  • Yellow hypergiants with dusty ejecta and ongoing instability are natural candidates for post-red-supergiant stars and should be searched as progenitors of Type IIb or other stripped-envelope supernovae.
  • If episodic mass loss is common, the time-integrated mass loss of luminous red supergiants could be larger than steady-wind estimates, altering evolutionary tracks and final masses.
  • Magnetic fields in red supergiant ejecta, already detected in masers, could become a standard diagnostic for identifying active surfaces and predicting future outbursts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's synthesis implies a testable prediction: the most luminous red supergiants should show photometric or spectroscopic dimming events at a rate that scales with their mass-loss rates, so monitoring campaigns could quantify the frequency of episodic outbursts.
  • If post-red-supergiant evolution is real, some yellow hypergiants should show direct evidence of a prior red supergiant phase in their surrounding ejecta (for instance, oxygen-rich dust or silicate features), which can be checked in infrared spectra.
  • The rarity of failed supernovae compared with the red supergiant problem suggests that most high-mass red supergiants may not collapse silently but rather explode as warmer stars; a systematic comparison of the rates of Type IIb and Type II-L supernovae with the red supergiant mass function could test this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is the introductory review of a Galaxies Special Issue on red supergiants (RSGs). It summarizes the observed properties of RSGs (temperature, luminosity, radius, mass range), their variability and binarity, and the empirical basis for their dusty mass loss, including episodic outflows. The final sections discuss the 'red supergiant problem' — the absence of high-mass Type II-P progenitors — and the possibility that high mass-loss rates in the most luminous RSGs lead, via Maeder's critical core-mass criterion, to post-RSG evolution to warmer yellow-hypergiant states. The paper is explicitly provisional: it flags the uncertain gas-to-dust ratio, the extinction correction issue, and the unknown final fate of post-RSG hypergiants, and it presents failed supernovae and direct collapse as alternative or additional explanations.

Significance. The paper's value is as a compact, historically informed synthesis that connects two active research threads — episodic mass loss and the missing high-mass SN II-P progenitors — and points to key observational anchors (Betelgeuse's Great Dimming, VY CMa, IRC+10420, Var A, N6946-BH1). It is transparent about the uncertainties in the empirical mass-loss rates and about the tentative status of the post-RSG evolutionary channel. No new calculations or derivations are offered, but for an introductory review this is appropriate; the paper provides a reliable entry point to the Special Issue and correctly represents the cited literature. The main limitation, that the cumulative effect of episodic mass loss on the pre-SN structure is not yet demonstrated, is a field-wide open question rather than an internal inconsistency.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 6, 'High Mass Loss Episodes and Post-Red Supergiant Evolution'] The text would be strengthened by an explicit sentence acknowledging that the duty cycle and total duration of the high-loss episodes are the key unknowns in the cumulative mass-loss budget, since the quoted rates of 10^-5 to more than 10^-4 M_sun/yr are only meaningful if sustained for a sufficient fraction of the RSG lifetime.
  2. [Sections 5 and 6] There are several typographical spacing errors: 'areBarbon et al.' in Section 5, and 'Smartt'sconclusions' and 'V ery' in Section 6; these should be corrected.
  3. [Figure 3 caption and Figure 2 caption] In the Figure 3 caption, 'spectal' should be 'spectral'; in the Figure 2 caption, 'MgSiO' is likely intended as 'MgSiO3' or a generic silicate.
  4. [Section 4] Consider spelling out 'GaGe bolometers' as 'gallium-doped germanium (Ge:Ga) bolometers' for clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the paper is a qualitative review; self-citations are data references, not load-bearing reductions.

full rationale

The paper is an introductory review of red supergiant properties, mass loss, and possible post-red supergiant evolution. It does not present a derivation or a quantitative predictive chain that could reduce to its own inputs. The central synthesis in Section 6—that high mass loss rates, episodic outbursts, and post-RSG blueward evolution may explain the red supergiant problem—is argued qualitatively by citing observed mass-loss rates, the Maeder (1981) critical-core result, and individual objects such as IRC+10420 and VY CMa. There is no equation in the paper that is fitted and then renamed as a prediction. The author's frequent self-citations (e.g., Refs. [37], [51], [53]–[55], [73]–[78]) support specific observational claims about individual stars or historical HR diagrams; these are data and analysis references appropriate for a review by a leading contributor, and they do not substitute for an independent derivation of the paper's conclusions. The weakest element noted by the reader—the uncertain gas-to-dust ratio in mass-loss estimates and the lack of a stellar-evolution calculation demonstrating cumulative mass loss sufficient for a blue loop—is an empirical and quantitative gap, not circularity. The review also cites substantial independent work (Smartt et al. 2009, van Loon et al. 2005, Mauron & Josselin 2011, Maeder 1981) for its main physical premises. Therefore no specific circular step is exhibited, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review and introduces no new free parameters or entities. All quantitative inputs are taken from the cited literature. The central discussion relies on standard domain assumptions, including a specific temperature scale, evolutionary tracks, and distance moduli.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption MARCS model atmospheres provide accurate effective temperatures and bolometric corrections for red supergiants.
    Used in Section 3.1 to convert spectral types and colors to Teff and luminosity. The choice of temperature scale affects all derived stellar parameters.
  • domain assumption Evolutionary tracks of massive stars reliably relate HRD position to initial stellar mass.
    In Sections 2 and 3.1, initial masses of 9 to 40 solar masses are inferred by comparing positions on the HRD with evolutionary models; the upper limit depends on the validity of these tracks.
  • domain assumption Mass loss rates derived from dust emission assume grain properties and a gas-to-dust ratio of 100 to 200.
    Stated in Section 4. These assumptions directly affect the magnitude of mass loss quoted and the interpretation of episodic events.
  • domain assumption Adopted distances to the LMC and SMC are correct.
    Luminosities in the HRDs and mass loss relations depend on the distances to these galaxies, as noted in Section 3.1.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Red Supergiants -- The Other Side of the H-R Diagram." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q5STNBQ7

@misc{pith2026250715965,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Red Supergiants -- The Other Side of the H-R Diagram},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q5STNBQ7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15965}
}
read the original abstract

Red supergiants are the largest stars known with some of the highest mass loss rates observed. They are the final stage in the evolution of the majority of massive stars. The unexpected discovery of high mass loss episodes in many red supergiants have posed questions about the role of mass loss on their final stages. The papers in this volume are timely reviews of our current understanding of this often surprising population of massive stars. This introductory paper is a brief summary of their observed properties and a historical perspective on some of the current problems on mass loss, their circumstellar environments, and their evolutionary state.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.15965 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Left): A recent HRD for the luminous stars in the LMC with spectral types [2]. The dashed line is the Humphreys–Davidson (HD) limit. (Right): An early HRD for the Perseus cluster showing the blue and red supergiants [3]. But, not all massive stars become red supergiants. Humphreys & Davidson [4] rec￾ognized an empirical upper luminosity boundary in the observed H-R Diagrams for the massive star populations in the M… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (Left): The 10 µm emission feature observed in the RSGs µCep and α Ori and two late type giants. (Right): Comparison of the emissivity of the 10 µm emission (dashed line) with two types of Mg silicates, olivine and a grain mixture, Woolf & Ney [34]. Red supergiants and other high luminosity cool stars were thus the obvious targets for infrared astronomy in the 1970s. Silicate emission was the distinguishing feature … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) The SEDs for three RSGS with the same spectal class but different luminosity classification illustrating the dependence of the 10 µm silicate feature on the star’s luminosity. (b) The SEDs for four RSGs. Three of the stars have significant excess radiation in the mid-infrared region from 2 to 8 µm in addition to the silicate emission feature indicative of extended circumstellar ejecta [35]. This early work was q… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: CHARA near-infrared interferometric images of AZ Cyg illustrating the variability of the surface asymmetries [18]. The recent M˙ vs. luminosity relations for the Magellanic Clouds [49,50] plus the RSG-rich clusters in the Milky Way [51] are curved and show an upward tu…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Multiwavelength HST WFPC2 images of the hypergiants (Left): IRC+10420 [76], (Center): VY CMa [77], (Right): NML Cyg [78]. The final fate of the post RSG yellow hypergiants is not known. Very few yellow hyper￾giants have been confirmed as supernova progenitors. The best…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. JWST Detects a Dusty AGB-like Source Before the Type Ia-CSM Supernova 2026sqf

    astro-ph.SR 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Pre-explosion JWST and HST images reveal a dusty, luminous AGB-like point source at the site of SN 2026sqf, the first candidate progenitor system for a Type Ia-CSM supernova.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The Astrophysics of Red Supergiants; Institute of Physics Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017; ISBN 978-0-7503-1330-8

    Levesque, E. The Astrophysics of Red Supergiants; Institute of Physics Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017; ISBN 978-0-7503-1330-8

    2017

  2. [2]

    A Census of the Most Luminous Stars

    Martin, J.C.; Humphreys, R.M. A Census of the Most Luminous Stars. I. The Upper HR Diagram for the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. J. 2023, 166, 214–225. [CrossRef]

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    The M-Type Supergiant Members of the Double Cluster in Perseus

    Bidelman, W.P . The M-Type Supergiant Members of the Double Cluster in Perseus. Astrophys. J. 1947, 105, 492–496. [CrossRef]

    work page 1947

  4. [4]

    Studies of Luminous stars in Nearby Galaxies

    Humphreys, R.M.; Davidson, K. Studies of Luminous stars in Nearby Galaxies. III—Comments on the Evolution of the Most Massive Stars in the Milky Way and the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astrophys. J. 1979, 232, 409–420. [CrossRef]

    work page 1979

  5. [5]

    McCarthy, M.F. Fr. Secchi and Stellar Spectra. Pop. Astron. 1950, 58, 153–168

    work page 1950

  6. [6]

    The Henry Draper Catalog

    Cannon, A.J.; Pickering, E.C. The Henry Draper Catalog. HA 1918–1924, 91–99

    work page 1918

  7. [7]

    Morgan, W.W.; Keenan, P .C.; Kellman, E.An Atlas of Stellar Spectra, with an Outline of Spectral Classification; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1943

    work page 1943

  8. [8]

    Transformations from Theoretical H-R Diagrams to C-M Diagrams

    Flower, P .J. Transformations from Theoretical H-R Diagrams to C-M Diagrams. Astron. Astrophys. 1977, 54, 31–39

    work page 1977

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    Transformations from Theoretical Hertzsprung-Russell Diagrams to Color-Magnitude Diagrams: Effective Tempera- tures, B-V Colors, and Bolometric Corrections

    Flower, P .J. Transformations from Theoretical Hertzsprung-Russell Diagrams to Color-Magnitude Diagrams: Effective Tempera- tures, B-V Colors, and Bolometric Corrections. Astrophys. J. 1996, 469, 355–365. [CrossRef]

    1996

  2. [10]

    The Effective Temperature Scale of Galactic Red Supergiants: Cool, but Not as Cool as We Thought

    Levesque, E.M.; Massey, P .; Olsen, K.A.G.; Plez, B.; Josselin, E.; Maeder, A.; Meynet, G. The Effective Temperature Scale of Galactic Red Supergiants: Cool, but Not as Cool as We Thought. Astrophys. J. 2005, 628, 973–985. [CrossRef]

    2005

  3. [11]

    The Effective Temperatures and Physical Properties of Magellanic Cloud Red Supergiants: The Effects of Metallicity

    Levesque, E.M.; Massey, P .; Olsen, K.A.G.; Plez, B.; Meynet, G.; Maeder, A. The Effective Temperatures and Physical Properties of Magellanic Cloud Red Supergiants: The Effects of Metallicity. Astrophys. J. 2006, 645, 1102–1117. [CrossRef]

    2006

  4. [12]

    Spherical opacity sampling model atmospheres for M-giants

    Plez, B.; Brett, J.M.; Nordland, A. Spherical opacity sampling model atmospheres for M-giants. I. Techniques, data and discussion. Astron. Astrophys. 1992, 258, 551–571

    1992

  5. [13]

    A Grid of Model Atmospheres for Cool Stars

    Gustafsson, B.; Edvardsson, B.; Eriksson, K.; Mizuno-Wiedner, M.; Jørgensen, U.G.; Plez, B. A Grid of Model Atmospheres for Cool Stars. In Proceedings of the ASP Conference Proceedings, Tuebingen, Germany, 8–12 April 2002 ; Hubeny, I., Mihalas, D., Werner, K., Eds.; Stellar At...

    2002

  6. [14]

    A grid of MARCS model atmospheres for late-type stars

    Gustafsson, B.; Edvardsson, B.; Eriksson, K.; Jørgensen, U.G.; Nordlund, Å.; Plez, B. A grid of MARCS model atmospheres for late-type stars. I. Methods and general properties. Astron. Astrophys. 2008, 486, 951–970. [CrossRef]

    2008

  7. [15]

    The Temperatures of Red Supergiants

    Davies, B.; Kudritzki, R.-P .; Plez, B.; Trager, S.; Lançon, A.; Gazak, Z.; Bergemann, M.; Evans, C.; Chiavassa, A. The Temperatures of Red Supergiants. Astrophys. J. 2013, 767, 3–23. [CrossRef]

    2013

  8. [16]

    Luminous and Variable Stars in M31 and M33: The Yellow and Red Supergiants and Post=Red Supergiant Evolution

    Gordon, M.S.; Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J. Luminous and Variable Stars in M31 and M33: The Yellow and Red Supergiants and Post=Red Supergiant Evolution. Astrophys. J. 2016, 825, 50–67. [CrossRef]

    2016

  9. [17]

    An Optical Interferometric Look at Red Supergiants

    Norris, R.P .; Beltran, Y.; Lucero, K.; Frothingham, D. An Optical Interferometric Look at Red Supergiants. Bull. AAS 2023, 55, 163.11

    2023

  10. [18]

    Long Term Evolution of Surface Features on the Red Supergiant AZ Cyg

    Norris, R.P .; Baron, F.R.; Monnier, J.D.; Paladini, C.; Anderson, M.D.; Martinez, A.O.; Schaefer, G.H.; Che, X.; Chiavassa, A.; Connelley, M.S.; et al. Long Term Evolution of Surface Features on the Red Supergiant AZ Cyg. Astrophys. J. 2021, 919, 124–145. [CrossRef]

    2021

  11. [19]

    Infrared observations of late-type supergiants in the Magellanic Clouds

    Glass, I.S. Infrared observations of late-type supergiants in the Magellanic Clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1979, 186, 317–326. [CrossRef]

    1979

  12. [20]

    A period-luminosity relation for supergiant red variables in the LMC.Mon

    Feast, M.W.; Catchpole, R.M.; Carter, B.S.; Roberts, G. A period-luminosity relation for supergiant red variables in the LMC.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1980, 193, 377–380. [CrossRef]

    1980

  13. [21]

    HV 11423: The Coolest Supergiant in the SMC.Astrophys

    Massey, P .; Levesque, E.M.; Olsen, K.A.G.; Plez, B.; Skiff, B.A. HV 11423: The Coolest Supergiant in the SMC.Astrophys. J. 2007, 660, 301–310. [CrossRef]

    2007

  14. [22]

    Spectroscopic and Photometric Changes in the Peculiar Infrared Star VX Sagittarius.Astrophys

    Humphreys, R.M.; Lockwood, G.W. Spectroscopic and Photometric Changes in the Peculiar Infrared Star VX Sagittarius.Astrophys. J. 1972, 172, L59–L62. [CrossRef]

    1972

  15. [23]

    Binary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars

    Sana, H.; de Mink, S.E.; de Koter, A.; Langer, N.; Evans, C.J.; Gieles, M.; Gosset, E.; Izzard, R.G.; Le Bouquin, J.-B.; Schneider, F.R.N. Binary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars. Science 2012, 337, 444–453. [CrossRef]

    2012

  16. [24]

    Colour evolution of Betelgeuse and Antares over two millennia, derived from historical records, as a new constraint on mass and age

    Neuhäuser, R.; Torres, G.; Mugrauer, M.; Neuhäuser, D.L.; Chapman, J.; Luge, D.; Cosci, M. Colour evolution of Betelgeuse and Antares over two millennia, derived from historical records, as a new constraint on mass and age. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2022, 516, 693–719. [CrossRef]

    2022

  17. [25]

    On the absolute scale of mass-loss in red giants

    Kudritzki, R.P .; Reimers, D. On the absolute scale of mass-loss in red giants. II. Circumstellar absorption lines in the spectrum of alpha Sco B and mass-loss of alpha Sco A. Astron. Astrophys. 1978, 70, 227–239

    1978

  18. [26]

    The VV Cephei Stars

    Cowley, A.P . The VV Cephei Stars. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 1969, 81, 297–331. [CrossRef]

    1969

  19. [27]

    Twelve years of IUE spectra of the interacting binary VV Cephei.Astron

    Bauer, W.H.; Stencel, R.E.; Neff, D.H. Twelve years of IUE spectra of the interacting binary VV Cephei.Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 1991, 90, 175–183

    1991

  20. [28]

    The Ultraviolet Spectrum of VV Cephei Out of Eclipse

    Bauer, W.H.; Bennett, P .D. The Ultraviolet Spectrum of VV Cephei Out of Eclipse. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2000, 112, 31–49. [CrossRef]

    2000

  21. [29]

    The System of VV Cephei Derived from an Analysis of the H-alpha Line

    Wright, K.O. The System of VV Cephei Derived from an Analysis of the H-alpha Line. J. R. Astron. Soc. Can. 1977, 71, 152–193

    1977

  22. [30]

    The Special Case of VV Cephei

    Bennett, P .D.; Bauer, W.H. The Special Case of VV Cephei. In Giants of Eclipse: The ζ Aurigae Stars and Other Binary Systems ; Ake, T.B., Griffin, E., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; p. 85, ISBN 978-3-319-09197-6

    2015

  23. [31]

    A Buddy for Betelgeuse: Binarity as the Origin of the Long Secondary Period in α Orionis

    Goldberg, J.A.; Joyce, M.; Molnar, L.A. A Buddy for Betelgeuse: Binarity as the Origin of the Long Secondary Period in α Orionis. Astrophys. J. 2024, 977, 35–55. [CrossRef]

    2024

  24. [32]

    Radial Velocity and Astrometric Evidence for a Close Companion to Betelgeuse

    MacLeod, M.; Blunt, S.; De Rosa, R.J.; Dupree, A.K.; Granzer, T.; Harper, G.M.; Huang, C.D.; Leiner, E.M.; Loeb, A.; Nielsen, E.L.; et al. Radial Velocity and Astrometric Evidence for a Close Companion to Betelgeuse. Astrophys. J. 2025, 978, 50–81. [CrossRef]

    2025

  25. [33]

    Two-Micron Sky Survey, a Preliminary Catalog; NASA Special Publication: Washington, DC, USA, 1969

    Neugebauer, G.; Leighton, R.B. Two-Micron Sky Survey, a Preliminary Catalog; NASA Special Publication: Washington, DC, USA, 1969

    1969

  26. [34]

    Circumstellar Infrared Emission from Cool Stars

    Woolf, N.J.; Ney, E.P . Circumstellar Infrared Emission from Cool Stars. Astrophys. J. 1969, 155, 181–184. [CrossRef]

    1969

  27. [35]

    Spectroscopic and Photometric Observations of M Supergiants in Carina.Astrophys

    Humphreys, R.M.; Strecker, D.W.; Ney, E.P . Spectroscopic and Photometric Observations of M Supergiants in Carina.Astrophys. J. 1972, 172, 75–88. [CrossRef]

    1972

  28. [36]

    The Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) mission

    Neugebauer, G.; Habing, H.J.; van Duinen, R.; Aumann, H.H.; Baud, B.; Beichman, C.A.; Beintema, D.A.; Boggess, N.; Clegg, P .E.; de Jong, T.; et al. The Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) mission. Astrophys. J. 1984, 278, L1–L6. [CrossRef]

    1984

  29. [37]

    M supergiants in the Milky Way and the Magellanic Clouds: Colors, spectral types, and luminosities

    Elias, J.H.; Frogel, J.A.; Humphreys, R.M. M supergiants in the Milky Way and the Magellanic Clouds: Colors, spectral types, and luminosities. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 1985, 57, 57–131. [CrossRef]

    1985

  30. [38]

    The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS)

    Skrutskie, M.F.; Cutri, R.M.; Stiening, R.; Weinberg, M.D.; Schneider, S.; Carpenter, J.M.; Beichman, C.; Capps, R.; Chester, T.; Elias, J.; et al. The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). Astron. J. 2006, 131, 1163–1183

    2006

  31. [39]

    The WISE mission: An Atlas for Luminous Galaxy Evolution

    Blain, A.; Lonsdale, C.; Cutri, R.; WISE Team. The WISE mission: An Atlas for Luminous Galaxy Evolution. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 2005, 37, 1393

    2005

  32. [40]

    Mass Loss Rates in the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram

    de Jager, C.; Nieuwenhuijzen, H.; van der Hucht, K.A. Mass Loss Rates in the Hertzsprung-Russell Diagram. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 1988, 72, 259–289

    1988

  33. [41]

    An Empirical Formula for the Mass-Loss Rates of Dust-Enshrouded Red Supergiants and Oxygen-Rich Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars

    van Loon, J.T.; Cioni, M.-R.L.; Zijlstra, A.A.; Loup, C. An Empirical Formula for the Mass-Loss Rates of Dust-Enshrouded Red Supergiants and Oxygen-Rich Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2005, 438, 273–289. [CrossRef]

    2005

  34. [42]

    The Mass-Loss Rates of Red Supergiants and the de Jager Prescription

    Mauron, N.; Josselin, E. The Mass-Loss Rates of Red Supergiants and the de Jager Prescription. Astron. Astrophys. 2011, 526, 156–170. [CrossRef]

    2011

  35. [43]

    Exploring the Red Supergiant wind kink

    Vink, J.S.; Subhahit, G.N. Exploring the Red Supergiant wind kink. A Universal mass-loss concept for massive stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 678, L3–L7. [CrossRef] Galaxies 2025, 13, 25 11 of 12

    2023

  36. [44]

    Radiation Pressure on Grains as a Mechanism for Mass Loss in Red Giants

    Kwok, S. Radiation Pressure on Grains as a Mechanism for Mass Loss in Red Giants. Astrophys. J. 1975, 198, 583–591. [CrossRef]

    1975

  37. [45]

    Very Large Telescope three micron spectra of dust-enshrouded red giants in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    van Loon, J.T.; Marshall, J.R.; Cohen, M.; Matsuura, M.; Wood, P .R.; Yamamura, I.; Zijlstra, A.A. Very Large Telescope three micron spectra of dust-enshrouded red giants in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 2006, 447, 971–989. [CrossRef]

    2006

  38. [46]

    First Image of the Surface of a Star with the Hubble Space Telescope

    Gilliland, R.L.; Dupree, A.K. First Image of the Surface of a Star with the Hubble Space Telescope. Astrophys. J. 1996, 463, L29–L32. [CrossRef]

    1996

  39. [47]

    The Great Dimming of the Hypergiant Star RW Cephei: CHARA Array Images and Spectral Analysis

    Anugu, N.; Baron, F.; Gies, D.R.; Lanthermann, C.; Schaefer, G.H.; Shepard, K.A.; Brummelaar, T.T.; Monnier, J.D.; Kraus, S.; Le Bouquin, J.-B.; et al. The Great Dimming of the Hypergiant Star RW Cephei: CHARA Array Images and Spectral Analysis. Astron. J. 2023, 166, 78–89. [CrossRef]

    2023

  40. [48]

    Time Evolution Images of the Hypergiant RW Cephei during the Rebrightening Phase Following the Great Dimming

    Anugu, N.; Gies, D.R.; Roettenbacher, R.M.; Monnier, J.D.; Montargés, M.; Mérand, A.; Baron, F.; Schaefer, G.H.; Shepard, K.A.; Kraus, S.; et al. Time Evolution Images of the Hypergiant RW Cephei during the Rebrightening Phase Following the Great Dimming. Astrophys. J. 2024, 9...

    2024

  41. [49]

    Evolved Massive Stars at Low-metallicity

    Yang, M.; Bonanos, A.Z.; Jiang, B.; Zapartas, E.; Gao, J.; Ren, Y.; Lam, M.I.; Wang, T.; Maravelias, G.; Gavras, P .; et al. Evolved Massive Stars at Low-metallicity. V . Mass-loss Rate of Red Supergiant Stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud.Astron. Astrophys. 2023, 676, 84–100....

    2023

  42. [50]

    Establishing a Mass-loss rate Relation for Red Supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud

    Antoniadis, K.; Bonanos, A.; de Wit, S.; Zapartas, E.; Munoz-Sanchez, G.; Maravelias, G. Establishing a Mass-loss rate Relation for Red Supergiants in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Astron. Astrophys. 2024, 686, 88–105. [CrossRef]

    2024

  43. [51]

    Exploring the Mass-loss Histories of the Red Supergiants

    Humphreys, R.M.; Helmel, G.; Jones, T.J.; Gordon, M.S. Exploring the Mass-loss Histories of the Red Supergiants. Astron. J. 2020, 160, 145–165;. [CrossRef]

    2020

  44. [52]

    Spatially Resolved Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of the Great Dimming of Betelgeuse

    Dupree, A.K.; Strassmeier, K.G.; Matthews, L.D.; Uitenbroek, H.; Calderwood, T.; Granzer, T.; Guinan, E.F.; Leike, R.; Mon- targès, M.; Richards, A.M.S.; et al. Spatially Resolved Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of the Great Dimming of Betelgeuse. Astrophys. J. 2020, 899, 68–79. [CrossRef]

    2020

  45. [53]

    The Mass-loss History of the Red Hypergiant VY CMa

    Humphreys, R.M.; Davidson, K.; Richards, A.M.S.; Ziurys, L.M.; Jones, T.J.; Ishibashi, K. The Mass-loss History of the Red Hypergiant VY CMa. Astron. J. 2021, 161, 98–108. [CrossRef]

    2021

  46. [54]

    The Hidden Clumps in VY CMa Uncovered by ALMA

    Humphreys, R.M.; Richards, A.M.S.; Davidson, K.; Singh, A.P .; Decin, L.; Ziurys, L.M. The Hidden Clumps in VY CMa Uncovered by ALMA. Astron. J. 2024, 167, 94–106. [CrossRef]

    2024

  47. [55]

    Episodic Gaseous Outflows and Mass Loss from Red Supergiants

    Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J. Episodic Gaseous Outflows and Mass Loss from Red Supergiants. Astron. J. 2022, 163, 103–109. [CrossRef]

    2022

  48. [56]

    Circular Polarization of Water Masers in the Circumstellar Envelopes of Late Type Stars

    Vlemmings, W.H.T.; Diamond, P .J.; van Langevelde, H.J. Circular Polarization of Water Masers in the Circumstellar Envelopes of Late Type Stars. Astron. Astrophys. 2002, 394, 589–602. [CrossRef]

    2002

  49. [57]

    Supernovae

    Zwicky, F. Supernovae. InStellar Structure–Stars and Stellar Systems Vol. VIII; Aller, L.H., McLaughlin, D.B., Eds.; University of Chicgo Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1965; p. 367

    1965

  50. [58]

    Spectra of Supernovae

    Minkowski, R. Spectra of Supernovae. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 1941, 53, 224–225. [CrossRef]

    1941

  51. [59]

    On the lower mass limit for implosion type Supernovae

    Barbon, R.; Dallaporta, N.; Perinott, M.; Sussi, M.G. On the lower mass limit for implosion type Supernovae. Mem. Soc. Astronom. Ital. 1965, 36, 127–150

    1965

  52. [60]

    On the Presumed presupernova Stage for type II Supernovae

    Barbaro, G.; Dallaporta, N.; Summa, G. On the Presumed presupernova Stage for type II Supernovae. Comm. Konkoly Obs. 1969, 65, 41–50

    1969

  53. [61]

    Photometric Properties of Type II Supernovae

    Barbon, R.; Ciatti, F.; Rosino, L. Photometric Properties of Type II Supernovae. Astron. Astrophys. 1979, 72, 287–292

    1979

  54. [62]

    The most massive stars evolving to red supergiants—Evolution with mass loss, WR stars as post-red supergiants and pre-supernovae

    Maeder, A. The most massive stars evolving to red supergiants—Evolution with mass loss, WR stars as post-red supergiants and pre-supernovae. Astron. Astrophys. 1981, 99, 97–107

    1981

  55. [63]

    The death of massive stars—I

    Smartt, S.J.; Eldridge, J.J.; Crockett, R.M.; Maund, J.R. The death of massive stars—I. Observational constraints on the progenitors of Type II-P supernovae. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2009, 395, 1409–1437. [CrossRef]

    2009

  56. [64]

    Observational Constraints on the Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supe rnovae: The Case for Missing High-Mass Stars

    Smartt, S.J. Observational Constraints on the Progenitors of Core-Collapse Supe rnovae: The Case for Missing High-Mass Stars. Publ. Astron. Soc. Aust. 2015, 32, e002. [CrossRef]

    2015

  57. [65]

    The Evolution of Red Supergiants to Supernova in NGC 2100

    Beasor, E.M.; Davies, B. The Evolution of Red Supergiants to Supernova in NGC 2100. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2016, 463, 1269–1283. [CrossRef]

    2016

  58. [66]

    The Initial Masses of the Red Supergiant Progenitors to Type II Supernovae.Mon

    Davies, B.; Beasor, E.M. The Initial Masses of the Red Supergiant Progenitors to Type II Supernovae.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 474, 2116–2128. [CrossRef]

    2018

  59. [67]

    Circumstellar Dust as a Solution to the Red Supergiant Supernova Progenitor Problem

    Walmswell, J.J.; Eldridge, J.J. Circumstellar Dust as a Solution to the Red Supergiant Supernova Progenitor Problem. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2012, 419, 2054–2062. [CrossRef]

    2012

  60. [68]

    The Dusty Progenitor Star of the Type II Supernova 2017eaw

    Kilpatrick, C.D.; Foley, R.J. The Dusty Progenitor Star of the Type II Supernova 2017eaw. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2018, 481, 2536–2547. [CrossRef]

    2018

  61. [69]

    The Search for Failed Supernovae with the Large Binocular Telescope: First Candidates

    Gerke, J.R.; Kochanek, C.S.; Stanek, K.Z. The Search for Failed Supernovae with the Large Binocular Telescope: First Candidates. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 450, 3289–3305. [CrossRef]

    2015

  62. [70]

    The Search for Failed Supernovae with the Large Binocular Telescope: Confirmation of a Disappearing Star

    Adams, S.M.; Kochanek, C.S.; Gerke, J.R.; Stanek, K.Z.; Dai, X. The Search for Failed Supernovae with the Large Binocular Telescope: Confirmation of a Disappearing Star. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2017, 468, 4968–4981. [CrossRef]

    2017

  63. [71]

    Comments on the Progenitor of NGC 6946-BH1

    Humphreys, R.M. Comments on the Progenitor of NGC 6946-BH1. Res. Notes AAS 2019, 3, 164–167. [CrossRef]

    2019

  64. [72]

    The Disappearance of a Massive Star Marking the Birth of a Black Hole in M31

    De, K.; MacLeod, M.; Jencson, J.E.; Lovegrove, E.; Antoni, A.; Kara, E.; Kasliwal, M.M.; Lau, R.M.; Loeb, A.; Masterson, M.; et al. The Disappearance of a Massive Star Marking the Birth of a Black Hole in M31. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2410.14778. Galaxies 2025, 13, 25 12 of 12

    2024

  65. [73]

    M33’s Variable A: A Hypergiant Star More Than 35 YEARS in Eruption

    Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J.; Polomski, E.; Koppelman, M.; Helton, A.; McQuinn, K.; Gehrz, R.D.; Woodward, C.E.; Wagner, R.M.; Gordon, K.; et al. M33’s Variable A: A Hypergiant Star More Than 35 YEARS in Eruption. Astron. J. 2006, 131, 2105–2113. [CrossRef]

    2006

  66. [74]

    The Morphology of IRC+10420’s Circumstellar Ejecta.Astron

    Tiffany, C.; Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J.; Davidson, K. The Morphology of IRC+10420’s Circumstellar Ejecta.Astron. J. 2010, 140, 339–349. [CrossRef]

    2010

  67. [75]

    Searching for Cool Dust in the Mid-to-far Infrared: The Mass-loss Histories of the Hypergiants µ Cep, VY CMa, IRC+10420, and ρ Cas

    Shenoy, D.; Humphreys, R.M.; Jones, T.J.; Marengo, M.; Gehrz, R.D.; Helton, L.A.; Hoffmann, W.F.; Skemer, A.J.; Hinz, P .M. Searching for Cool Dust in the Mid-to-far Infrared: The Mass-loss Histories of the Hypergiants µ Cep, VY CMa, IRC+10420, and ρ Cas. Astron. J. 2016, 151,...

    2016

  68. [76]

    HST and Infrared Images of the Circumstellar Environment of the Cool Hypergiant IRC + 10420

    Humphreys, R.M.; Smith, N.; Davidson, K.; Jones, T.J.; Gehrz, R.T.; Mason, C.G.; Hayward, T.L.; Houck, J.R.; Krautter, J. HST and Infrared Images of the Circumstellar Environment of the Cool Hypergiant IRC + 10420. Astron. J. 1997, 114, 2778–2788. [CrossRef]

    1997

  69. [77]

    The Asymmetric Nebula Surrounding the Extreme Red Supergiant VY Canis Majoris

    Smith, N.; Humphreys, R.M.; Davidson, K.; Gehrz, R.D.; Schuster, M.T.; Krautter, J. The Asymmetric Nebula Surrounding the Extreme Red Supergiant VY Canis Majoris. Astron. J. 2001, 121, 1111–1125. [CrossRef]

    2001

  70. [78]

    The Circumstellar Environments of NML Cygni and the Cool Hypergiants

    Schuster, M.T.; Humphreys, R.M.; Marengo, M. The Circumstellar Environments of NML Cygni and the Cool Hypergiants. Astron. J. 2006, 131, 603–611. [CrossRef]

    2006

  71. [79]

    The Yellow Supergiant Progenitor of the Type II Supernova 2011dh in M51

    Maund, J.R.; Fraser, M.; Ergon, M.; Pastorello, A.; Smartt, S.J.; Sollerman, J.; Benetti, S.; Botticella, M.-T.; Bufano, F.; Danziger, I.J.; et al. The Yellow Supergiant Progenitor of the Type II Supernova 2011dh in M51. Astrophys. J. 2011, 739, 37L–42L. [CrossRef]

    2011

  72. [80]

    The Progenitor of Supernova 2011dh/PTF11eon in Messier 51.Astrophys

    Van Dyk, S.D.; Li, W.; Cenko, S.B.; Kasliwal, M.M.; Horesh, A.; Ofek, E.O.; Kraus, A.L.; Silverman, J.M.; Arcavi, I.; Filippenko, A.V .; et al. The Progenitor of Supernova 2011dh/PTF11eon in Messier 51.Astrophys. J. 2011, 741, L28–L33. [CrossRef]

    2011

  73. [81]

    The Progenitor of Supernova 2011dh has Vanished

    Van Dyk, S.D.; Zheng, W.; Clubb, K.I.; Filippenko, A.V .; Cenko, S.B.; Smith, N.; Fox, O.D.; Kelly, P .L.; Shivvers, I.; Ganeshalingam, M. The Progenitor of Supernova 2011dh has Vanished. Astrophys. J. 2013, 772, L32–L37. [CrossRef] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements,...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.