Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 48 references

Classifying Compact Radio Emission in Nearby Galaxies: a 10GHz Study of Active Galactic Nuclei, Supernovae, Anomalous Microwave Emission and Star Forming Regions

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that high-resolution 10 GHz imaging of three nearby galaxies separates compact radio sources into star-forming regions, anomalous microwave emission candidates, a supernova remnant, and background AGN that coarser surveys…

desk verdict Solid pilot study with new 10 GHz A-config data; the AME compact counterparts and AGN reclassification are plausible but need a false-match calculation and a few corrections before I'd lean on them. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.23332 v1 pith:WUB2T3YZ submitted 2025-07-31 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE

Kristen C. Dage , Eric W. Koch , Evangelia Tremou , Kwangmin Oh , Susmita Sett , Cosima Eibensteiner , Sean T. Linden , Angiraben D. Mahida
show 14 more authors
Eric J. Murphy Muhammad Ridha Aldhalemi Zainab Bustani Mariam Ismail Fawaz Hans J. Harff Amna Khalyleh Timothy McBride Jesse Mason Anthony Preston Cortney Rinehart Ethan Vinson Teresa Panurach Richard M. Plotkin Liliana Rivera Sandoval
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords compactradiosourcesanomalousmicrowaveemissionstar-formingregionsX-raybinariesactivegalacticnucleisupernovaremnantsNGC4631M51(NGC5194)
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to show that very high resolution radio imaging can sort compact radio emission in nearby galaxies into its physical kinds, and that doing so changes how some previously catalogued objects should be classified. Using the VLA's most extended array at 10 GHz, it detects 115 compact point sources in three galaxies and finds matches to eight star-forming regions, four anomalous microwave emission (AME) candidates, and one supernova remnant. Nine compact sources also have X-ray counterparts, and most of those are background AGN rather than sources inside the galaxies. The central claim is that even inside a galaxy's optical disk, background AGN can masquerade as X-ray binaries in lower-resolution surveys, so clean X-ray binary samples require high-resolution multi-band radio imaging. If this is right, the four AME candidates with compact counterparts also narrow the physical origin of anomalous microwave emission to compact H II regions.

What carries the argument

The central object is a catalog of 115 compact radio point sources detected at roughly 0.15 arcsecond resolution (a few parsecs at these distances) in VLA A-configuration 8-12 GHz images. The method that carries the argument is positional cross-matching of these compact sources against the coarser resolved-emission catalog and against Chandra X-ray catalogs, using 2.5 arcsecond and 1 arcsecond tolerances; the ratio of inferred diffuse 10 GHz flux to measured compact flux tells how much emission has been resolved out, and spectral indices measured within X-band (for example, $\alpha = 2.7\pm0.1$ for Source 65) separate optically thick free-free emission from other mechanisms.

What would settle it

Shift the 115 compact radio positions by a few tens of arcseconds and rerun the same 1-arcsecond and 2.5-arcsecond cross-matches; the count of accidental matches gives a chance-coincidence baseline, and if that baseline is comparable to the observed match counts, the claimed star-forming region, AME, and AGN associations are not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper presents a compact 10 GHz catalog of 115 point sources from VLA A-configuration observations of NGC 5474, NGC 4631, and M51, then matches it against a published 3/15/33 GHz resolved-radio catalog and archival Chandra X-ray data. It reports compact counterparts to eight star-forming regions, four anomalous microwave emission candidates, and the supernova SN 2011dh, and finds that nine compact radio sources have X-ray counterparts, the majority of which are background galaxies rather than sources in the target galaxies. The strongest single case is a source in NGC 4631 whose resolved radio jets show it to be a background AGN despite having been catalogued as a star-forming region in the diffuse survey and as a high-mass X-ray binary in the X-ray data. The paper also reclassifies a previously catalogued M51 source, Source 65, as a compact, optically thick H II region on the basis of a rising spectral index $\alpha = 2.7 \pm 0.1$.

Load-bearing premise

The classifications rest on the assumption that a compact radio source falling within 1-2.5 arcseconds of an X-ray or diffuse-radio source is physically the same object, and the paper does not compute how many such alignments would occur by chance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A background AGN inside the optical disk of NGC 4631 was previously listed as both a star-forming region and a high-mass X-ray binary; if the same pattern holds elsewhere, unresolved X-ray binary samples are contaminated at a measurable rate and should be re-examined with high-resolution radio imaging.
  • Four anomalous microwave emission candidates now have compact 10 GHz radio counterparts, pointing to compact H II regions as the physical sites of at least some AME.
  • SN 2011dh is detected as a compact 10 GHz source, and the rising $\alpha=2.7\pm0.1$ spectrum of Source 65 shows that optically thick free-free emission from an extragalactic compact H II region can be identified at few-parsec scales.
  • The diffuse-to-compact flux ratios show most compact sources carry only a small fraction of the total emission, so classifications based on lower-resolution spectral energy distributions need a resolved counterpart before they can be trusted.
  • Future sensitive radio surveys can apply the same compact-source screen routinely, cleaning AGN out of X-ray binary and intermediate-mass black hole searches.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A quantitative next step the paper leaves implicit is a Monte Carlo estimate of chance coincidences; without it, the eight star-forming region and four AME associations carry an unquantified background-contamination risk even if the physical picture is correct.
  • If the four AME compact counterparts hold up, high-resolution mid-infrared spectroscopy of exactly those positions could distinguish spinning-dust emission from free-free and synchrotron, testing the AME-compact H II connection directly.
  • The same A-configuration 10 GHz technique applied to a large sample of nearby galaxies could map how AGN contamination in X-ray binary catalogs grows with stellar mass and position inside the galaxy, rather than being inferred from three galaxies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents 115 compact 10 GHz VLA A-configuration radio sources toward NGC 5474, NGC 4631, and M51, and cross-matches them with the diffuse radio catalog of Linden et al. (2020) and archival Chandra X-ray catalogs. The authors report compact counterparts to eight star-forming regions, four anomalous microwave emission (AME) candidates, and the supernova SN 2011dh, and they argue that several X-ray-matched sources are background AGN that contaminate previous X-ray binary classifications, including one AGN in NGC 4631 with resolved jet morphology. The central methodological step is positional association at 1" (X-ray-to-radio) and 2.5" (diffuse-to-compact) tolerances, and the paper does not quantify the expected number of chance coincidences. Additional internal inconsistencies appear in the abstract's X-ray match count and in Table 4.

Significance. If the associations are secure, the paper would provide the first compact radio counterparts to AME candidates, linking AME to compact H II regions, and would demonstrate that background AGN projected within the D25 isophotes can contaminate X-ray binary population studies. The new A-configuration X-band observations are an independent dataset, and the full source catalogs are released as supplementary material, which is a useful community resource. The resolved-jet example in NGC 4631 is particularly convincing and illustrates the power of high-resolution radio imaging. However, the positional association claims are load-bearing and need a proper false-match analysis before the AME and star-forming-region classifications can be considered secure.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2, Tables 2–3] The cross-matching uses fixed 1″ and 2.5″ tolerances without any estimate of the expected number of chance coincidences. Because the A-configuration catalog contains 115 compact sources detected at about 5σ, a non-negligible fraction are likely background AGN projected onto the target galaxies. This matters directly for the central claim in §4 that four AME candidates have compact counterparts: if even one of the four positional coincidences is a chance projection, the inference that AME arises from compact H II regions loses support. Please add a false-match-rate calculation (e.g., background source density times search area, or a likelihood-ratio association test) for both the 1″ and 2.5″ matches.
  2. [Abstract and §3.3] The abstract states that nine compact radio sources match X-ray counterparts, the majority of which are background galaxies, but the text reports one X-ray match in NGC 5474 (§3.1), one in NGC 4631 (§3.2), and nine in M51 (§3.3), for a total of eleven. Among the nine M51 matches in Table 4, only two are flagged as background galaxies (plus SN 2011dh and the galactic center), so the label 'majority' is not supported by the table. Please correct the abstract and reconcile the counts and classifications.
  3. [Table 4, row 2CXO J132952.6+471143] The tabulated S10GHz of 4.00±0.70×10^-5 mJy for Source 65 is inconsistent with the values used in §3.3, where the 9 and 11 GHz flux densities are 45 and 78 µJy (i.e., 4.5×10^-2 and 7.8×10^-2 mJy). The table entry appears to be off by roughly three orders of magnitude and should be corrected; as written, it contradicts the spectral-index calculation. This is a table-level error that must be fixed before the paper can be used reliably.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1] In the description of the X-ray data, 'NGC 4361' should be 'NGC 4631'.
  2. [§3.4] The quoted 'median' ratios of diffuse to compact emission, 29.2 for NGC 4631 and 10.7 for M51, are actually the arithmetic means of the values in Tables 2 and 3; the true medians are 19.3 and 7.25. Please correct the statistic or the terminology.
  3. [Table 2] The entry '0.03×10^-2' in the S15GHz column is confusing; if the flux density is 0.03 mJy, please write it without the extra power of ten.
  4. [§3.4] The comparison of beam areas with C-configuration at 10 GHz is not obviously the relevant benchmark, since the diffuse catalog of Linden et al. (2020) combines 3, 15, and 33 GHz data at B-configuration resolution; please clarify why the A-to-C beam ratio is used.
  5. [§3.3] When discussing Source 65, the text says the spectral index is measured over a small frequency range 'which may account for the α>2 index'; this caveat should be stated alongside the free-free interpretation to avoid over-emphasizing a single power-law fit.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the compact 10 GHz detections are new, independently calibrated data, and the L20 classifications used for cross-matching are published SED fits rather than outputs of this paper.

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on new VLA A-configuration 10 GHz observations reduced with standard CASA/PyBDSF procedures (Section 2.2), producing 115 compact sources that are not fitted to any prior classification. The diffuse classifications (SFR, AME) originate in Linden et al. (2020), a published catalog based on 3, 15, and 33 GHz SED modeling; the present paper's cross-match assigns those prior labels to new compact detections but does not derive the labels from the 10 GHz data. The 'Ratio' column in Tables 2 and 3 infers a diffuse 10 GHz flux density from L20 15 GHz flux densities and spectral indices and compares it to the measured compact flux; this is arithmetic re-expression of published values, not a prediction forced by the paper's own fit. The AME-to-compact-H II inference depends on positional coincidence within 2.5 arcsec, and the paper does not quantify chance coincidences, which is a statistical robustness limitation rather than circularity; the central classification claim is not logically reduced to its inputs. The NGC 4631 AGN reclassification is independently supported by resolved jet morphology in Figure 5, and the NGC 5474 background-galaxy identification rests on prior optical follow-up (Avdan et al. 2016; Atapin et al. 2024). No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or self-citation chain is invoked to forbid alternatives. The overlap of some authors with Linden et al. (2020) is a self-citation, but it is not load-bearing because the L20 catalog is an external, published benchmark with its own SED data, and the compact detections are new and independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the prior classification catalog and on the assumption that matches are real associations. The matching tolerances are hand-chosen analysis parameters, and the spectral index extrapolation is taken from the literature.

free parameters (2)
  • X-ray to radio matching tolerance = 1 arcsec
    Chosen by hand for cross-matching; affects which sources are deemed counterparts and could influence the classification results.
  • diffuse to compact matching tolerance = 2.5 arcsec
    Chosen to match the nominal size of diffuse regions in Linden et al. (2020); affects the number of matches and hence the reported SFR/AME counterparts.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The distances to NGC 4631, NGC 5474 and M51 are 7.3, 6.8 and 8.58 Mpc respectively, from the cited references.
    Used to convert fluxes to luminosities and to interpret physical scales; if incorrect, luminosity-based statements change.
  • domain assumption The diffuse source classifications (SFR, AME) from Linden et al. (2020) are correct.
    The paper relies on these classifications to label its compact counterparts; an error in the parent catalog would propagate.
  • domain assumption Positional coincidence within the matching tolerances implies physical association, with negligible chance alignment probability.
    The paper does not compute chance coincidence rates; this underpins every classification match in Tables 2 and 3.
  • domain assumption Spectral indices from Linden et al. (2020) apply between 15 GHz and 10 GHz for inferring diffuse 10 GHz flux densities.
    Used to compare diffuse to compact flux and to interpret resolved-out emission; a varying spectral index could change the ratios.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classifying Compact Radio Emission in Nearby Galaxies: a 10GHz Study of Active Galactic Nuclei, Supernovae, Anomalous Microwave Emission and Star Forming Regions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WUB2T3YZ

@misc{pith2026250723332,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classifying Compact Radio Emission in Nearby Galaxies: a 10GHz Study of Active Galactic Nuclei, Supernovae, Anomalous Microwave Emission and Star Forming Regions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WUB2T3YZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.23332}
}
read the original abstract

We present 115 compact radio point sources in three galaxies, NGC 5474, NGC 4631 and M51, taken in the most extended (A-)configuration of the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array at 10GHz. Several of these compact radio point sources have diffuse counterparts identified in previous multi-band studies of resolved radio continuum emission. We find compact counterparts to eight star forming regions, four anomalous microwave emission candidates, and one supernova remnant (SN 2011dh). Nine of the compact radio sources match X-ray counterparts, the majority of which are background galaxies. These AGN are all within the D25 (isophotal diameter) of the host galaxy and might act as contaminants for X-ray binary population studies, highlighting the need for high-resolution multi-band imaging. This study showcases the broad number of science cases that require sensitive radio facilities, like the upcoming Square Kilometre Array and the planned next generation Very Large Array.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.23332 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Our three targeted galaxies and their locations relative to the z = 0 massive galaxy populations from z0MGS (Leroy et al. 2019). Though a small sample, we highlight that all of these sources lie close to the locus of star-forming main sequence galaxies. a highly sensitive radio facility to probe a broad range of science cases. Throughout this paper, we make use of the terms “dif￾fuse”, “resolved”, and “compact” radi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Our resolved observations reveal clear AGN jets at position 12:42:03.59 +32:32:16.28 within the NGC 4631 field, strongly suggesting this is a background radio-bright AGN. However, this source has previously been catalogued as a star-forming region (SFR) based on lower resolution radio SED modeling by Linden et al. (2020), and as a HMXB from the coincident X-ray emission by Mineo et al. (2012). The orange band contou… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: HST Hα imaging of M51 with the location of Source 65 from Maddox et al. (2007) at 1.5 ′′ and our X￾band detection (0.15′′). The coincidence with a compact Hα source and the steep spectrum of α = 2.7 ± 0.1 suggests the source may be a radio-opaque and compact HII region…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P., Tollerud, E

    Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  2. [2]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 10185, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3719 Classifying Compact Radio Emission in Nearby Galaxies9

    Atapin, K., Vinokurov, A., Sarkisyan, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 10185, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3719 Classifying Compact Radio Emission in Nearby Galaxies9

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3719 2024

  3. [3]

    2016, MNRAS, 455, L91, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv155

    Avdan, S., Vinokurov, A., Fabrika, S., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 455, L91, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slv155

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv155 2016

  4. [4]

    2015, A&A Rv, 24, 4, doi: 10.1007/s00159-015-0084-4

    Beck, R. 2015, A&A Rv, 24, 4, doi: 10.1007/s00159-015-0084-4

    doi:10.1007/s00159-015-0084-4 2015

  5. [5]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1912.12699, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.12699

    Braun, R., Bonaldi, A., Bourke, T., Keane, E., & Wagg, J. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1912.12699, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1912.12699

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.12699 2019

  6. [6]

    Briggs, D. S. 1995, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 187, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, 112.02

    1995

  7. [7]

    C., Sabbi, E., et al

    Calzetti, D., Lee, J. C., Sabbi, E., et al. 2015, AJ, 149, 51, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/51 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022a, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642 —. 2022b, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642

    doi:10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/51 2015

  8. [8]

    2002, ARA&A, 40, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093845

    Churchwell, E. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093845

    arXiv 2002

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Condon, J. J. 1987, ApJS, 65, 485, doi: 10.1086/191234 de Oliveira-Costa, A., Kogut, A., Devlin, M. J., et al. 1997, ApJL, 482, L17, doi: 10.1086/310684

    1987 doi

  2. [10]

    T., & Lazarian, A

    Draine, B. T., & Lazarian, A. 1998a, ApJL, 494, L19, doi: 10.1086/311167 —. 1998b, ApJ, 508, 157, doi: 10.1086/306387 —. 1999, ApJ, 512, 740, doi: 10.1086/306809

    1999 doi

  3. [11]

    C., Allen, G

    Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6270, 62701V, doi: 10.1117/12.671760

    2006 doi

  4. [12]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad54b4

    Gregg, B., Calzetti, D., Adamo, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 115, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad54b4

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  6. [14]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  7. [15]

    J., Bennett, C

    Kogut, A., Banday, A. J., Bennett, C. L., et al. 1996, ApJ, 460, 1, doi: 10.1086/176947

    1996 doi

  8. [16]

    M., Readhead, A

    Leitch, E. M., Readhead, A. C. S., Pearson, T. J., & Myers, S. T. 1997, ApJL, 486, L23, doi: 10.1086/310823

    1997 doi

  9. [17]

    K., Sandstrom, K

    Leroy, A. K., Sandstrom, K. M., Lang, D., et al. 2019, ApJS, 244, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab3925

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    C., Bolatto, A

    Levy, R. C., Bolatto, A. D., Mayya, D., et al. 2024, ApJL, 973, L55, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7af3

    2024 doi

  11. [19]

    T., & Mihos, J

    Linden, S. T., & Mihos, J. C. 2022, ApJL, 933, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac7c06

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    T., Murphy, E

    Linden, S. T., Murphy, E. J., Dong, D., et al. 2020, ApJS, 248, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab8a4d

    2020 doi

  13. [21]

    T., Evans, A

    Linden, S. T., Evans, A. S., Armus, L., et al. 2023, ApJL, 944, L55, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb335

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    T., Lai, T., Evans, A

    Linden, S. T., Lai, T., Evans, A. S., et al. 2024, ApJL, 974, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7eae

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    A., Cowan, J

    Maddox, L. A., Cowan, J. J., Kilgard, R. E., Schinnerer, E., & Stockdale, C. J. 2007, AJ, 133, 2559, doi: 10.1086/515573

    2007 doi

  16. [24]

    2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed

    McKinney, W. 2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed. S. van der Walt & J. Millman, 51 – 56

    2010

  17. [25]

    2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Golap, K. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ed. R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, & D. J. Bell, 127

    2007

  18. [26]

    McQuinn, K. B. W., Skillman, E. D., Dolphin, A. E., Berg, D., & Kennicutt, R. 2016, ApJ, 826, 21, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/21

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    2012, MNRAS, 419, 2095, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19862.x

    Mineo, S., Gilfanov, M., & Sunyaev, R. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 2095, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19862.x

    2012

  20. [28]

    2015, PyBDSF: Python Blob Detection and Source Finder, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1502.007

    Mohan, N., & Rafferty, D. 2015, PyBDSF: Python Blob Detection and Source Finder, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1502.007

    2015

  21. [29]

    C., & Krause, M

    Mora, S. C., & Krause, M. 2013, A&A, 560, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321043

    2013 doi

  22. [30]

    J., Helou, G., Condon, J

    Murphy, E. J., Helou, G., Condon, J. J., et al. 2010, ApJL, 709, L108, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/709/2/L108

    2010 doi

  23. [31]

    J., Bolatto, A., Chatterjee, S., et al

    Murphy, E. J., Bolatto, A., Chatterjee, S., et al. 2018, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 517, Science with a Next Generation Very Large Array, ed. E. Murphy, 3, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1810.07524

    2018 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    C., Urquhart, R., et al

    Panurach, T., Dage, K. C., Urquhart, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.23335, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.23335

    2024 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    1987, A&A, 184, 86

    Paturel, G., Fouque, P., Lauberts, A., et al. 1987, A&A, 184, 86

    1987

  26. [34]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad534d

    Pedrini, A., Adamo, A., Calzetti, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 971, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad534d

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    2019, A&A, 625, A19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834915

    Querejeta, M., Schinnerer, E., Schruba, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 625, A19, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834915

    2019 doi

  28. [36]

    S., Soria, R., et al

    Rampadarath, H., Morgan, J. S., Soria, R., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 32, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1275

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Rau, U. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8500, Image Reconstruction from Incomplete Data VII, ed. P. J

    2012

  30. [38]

    Bones, M. A. Fiddy, & R. P. Millane, 85000N, doi: 10.1117/12.930207 Rodr ´ ıguez, M. J., Lee, J. C., Whitmore, B. C., et al. 2023, ApJL, 944, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aca653 Rodr ´ ıguez, M. J., Lee, J. C., Indebetouw, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 983, 137, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/...

    2023 doi

  31. [39]

    J., Murphy, E

    Selina, R. J., Murphy, E. J., McKinnon, M., et al. 2018, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 517, Science with a Next Generation Very Large Array, ed. E. Murphy, 15, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1810.08197

    2018 doi arXiv

  32. [40]

    2024, ApJ, 967, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3de6

    Sun, J., He, H., Batschkun, K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 133, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3de6

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    R., Clark, B

    Thompson, A. R., Clark, B. G., Wade, C. M., & Napier, P. J. 1980, ApJS, 44, 151, doi: 10.1086/190688

    1980 doi

  34. [42]

    A., Lebedev, V

    Tikhonov, N. A., Lebedev, V. S., & Galazutdinova, O. A. 2015, Astronomy Letters, 41, 239, doi: 10.1134/S1063773715060080

    2015 doi

  35. [43]

    B., Courtois, H

    Tully, R. B., Courtois, H. M., Dolphin, A. E., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 86, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/4/86

    2013 doi

  36. [44]

    2023, ApJ, 953, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace2c1

    Venkattu, D., Lundqvist, P., P´ erez Torres, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 953, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace2c1

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    A., & Braun, R

    Norman, C. A., & Braun, R. 1995, ApJ, 439, 176, doi: 10.1086/175162

    1995 doi

  38. [46]

    C., Chandar, R., Lee, J

    Whitmore, B. C., Chandar, R., Lee, J. C., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 63, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad098 —. 2025, ApJ, 982, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb3a2

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    2015, AJ, 150, 81, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/81

    Wiegert, T., Irwin, J., Miskolczi, A., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 81, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/81

    2015 doi

  40. [48]

    Yu, H., Zhu, M., Xu, J.-L., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 2719, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad436 Classifying Compact Radio Emission in Nearby Galaxies11 APPENDIX A.COMPLETE X-BAND SOURCE CATALOGS This paper focuses only on X-band sources that have existing multi-band radio or X-ray detec...

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.