Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 133 references

Social Media Information Operations

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that social media information operations are best modeled as a single constrained optimization problem, and that the same formulation covers both influence and defense.

desk verdict A solid, accurate tutorial that maps the IO literature through the MIAC framework; no new results, and the prescriptive optimization claim outruns the evidence, but it deserves peer review as a survey. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.01552 v1 pith:DFDKZ456 submitted 2025-08-03 cs.SI cs.SYeess.SY

Tauhid Zaman , Yen-Shao Chen This is my paper
classification cs.SIcs.SYeess.SY
keywords influencecampaignssocialmediaanalyticsnetworkoptimizationgenerativeAIinformationoperationsopiniondynamicsboundedconfidencemaximization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that information operations on social media—coordinated efforts to steer what populations believe—can be written as one constrained optimization problem: pick an actor, a set of behaviors, content, and a distribution plan so as to maximize an effectiveness measure evaluated on the opinion trajectories the campaign produces, subject to a budget and a feasible set. This formulation is the paper's organizing claim; if it holds, the usual analytics toolbox stops being a collection of heuristics and becomes a set of inputs and levers for a single pipeline. Monitor, identify, assess, and counter (MIAC) breaks that pipeline into phases, and each phase either estimates a quantity in the optimization or executes an intervention. A sympathetic reader would take the paper as saying that offense and defense are the same formal problem with different objectives, so progress on one side transfers to the other.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the IO optimization problem (Eq. (1)) together with the MIAC pipeline that decomposes it. The decision variables $(a,b,c,d)$ encode who acts, how they act, what they say, and where they distribute it; the transition $f$ is supplied by concrete models—linear threshold, independent cascade, SIR, self-exciting point processes, linear averaging, and bounded-confidence opinion dynamics—so the same objective $e(\Theta)$ (adopter count, mean opinion, variance, or activity) can be evaluated across very different campaign settings. MIAC's four phases make the abstraction operational: Monitor estimates the network $G=(V,E)$ and initial opinions $\theta_0$, Identify finds adversarial accounts and communities, Assess simulates $f$ to quantify the threat and define $e$, and Counter selects the optimized intervention, with generative AI turning the chosen content values into natural-language posts.

What would settle it

Run a field experiment in which matched sets of social media users receive optimized nudging messages computed from Eq. (5), extreme counter-messages, and no intervention; if the optimized set does not shift final mean opinion or reduce variance more than the extreme set under bounded-confidence assumptions, the central control model fails for that setting.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is the optimization problem in Eq. (1): $\max_{a,b,c,d} e(\Theta)$ subject to $\Theta_{:,t+1}=f(\Theta_{:,t},a,b,c,d;V,E)$, initial state $\Theta_{:,0}=\theta_0$, budget $m(a,b,c,d,T)\le M$, and feasibility $(a,b,c,d)\in\mathcal{F}$. Here $a$ is the actor (a manipulator, a bot army, or the platform itself), $b$ collects behavioral tactics such as posting rate and engagement patterns, $c$ is the content choice (topic, sentiment, media type), and $d$ is the distribution strategy (targeting, seeding, platforms); $f$ is any diffusion or opinion-dynamics model, and $e(\Theta)$ is the campaign objective, such as final mean opinion, opinion variance, cascade size, or total activity. The paper's claim is that this single abstraction organizes both offense and defense: threats are assessed by placing actors inside the same optimization, countermeasures are interventions in the same variables, and the MIAC pipeline—monitor, identify, assess, counter—is a tractable decomposition of the monolithic problem. Most of the tutorial is a survey showing how centrality, community detection, sentiment analysis, diffusion models, bounded-confidence opinion dynamics, content moderation, and large language model-generated content each plug into this one formulation.

Load-bearing premise

The pipeline presumes that the network, the starting opinions of users, the rule by which opinions change, and the measure of campaign success can all be estimated from data accurately enough for a computed intervention to actually move opinions in the real world.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For linear opinion dynamics, optimal sustained counter-influence is a constant-opinion policy with extreme content and discrete target selection; under bounded confidence, the optimal policy is dynamic nudging at the edges of listeners' confidence intervals, which makes extreme stubborn messaging ineffective or even backfiring.
  • Defensive viral campaigns inherit the $(1-1/e)$ greedy approximation guarantee for submodular influence maximization under the linear threshold and independent cascade models, so budget-constrained seed selection has provable quality bounds.
  • Platform moderation can be expressed as an edge-level control problem: scaling the interaction rate $\lambda_{ij}$ by a visibility factor $d_{ij}\in[0,1]$, with shadow banning as a linear control instance solvable in real time.
  • Generative AI operationalizes the optimization by translating computed opinion values into human-like posts, enabling continuous, scalable deployment of nudging policies that previously required manual messaging.
  • Because the same Eq. (1) governs offense and defense, a platform acting as a defender and an external actor acting as an attacker are solving the same mathematical program with different constraints; countermeasure design can therefore borrow directly from campaign optimization tools.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Offense and defense are one optimization problem with flipped objectives, so a method developed for attacking is immediately a defensive asset, and vice versa; the paper gestures at this symmetry but does not develop it.
  • A natural next step the paper does not take is to turn Eq. (1) into a multi-agent game in which the platform, a state-sponsored campaign, and a civil-society defender each solve their own variant; equilibrium analysis, not single-optimizer optimization, would then be required.
  • When platform APIs restrict graph and opinion data, behavior-only community detection and synthetic populations generated by large language models could stand in for $G$ and $\theta_0$, but the paper does not quantify how estimation error in those substitutes propagates through the optimization—a sensitivity study would settle that.
  • The framework suggests a concrete benchmark: on a real-world follower network with bounded-confidence dynamics, compare optimized nudging agents against greedy seed selection and against extreme stubborn agents under the same budget, with final mean opinion and variance as the shared objective; the paper's own simulations use this setup but stop short of head-to-head comparison.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This tutorial proposes a unified optimization formalism for social media information operations (IO). Equation (1) defines an IO optimization problem over decision variables (a, b, c, d) -- actor, behavior, content, distribution -- with opinion dynamics f, initial opinions theta0, a budget constraint, and a feasible set. The paper introduces the MIAC pipeline (Monitor, Identify, Assess, Counter) as a decomposition of this problem, then surveys the relevant analytics: centrality and community detection, sentiment and content analysis, monitoring and data-access challenges, threat actors (extremists, state actors, bots, misinformation), diffusion and opinion dynamics models, countermeasures (influence maximization, nudging, shadow banning, moderation), and the role of generative AI. The paper is a tutorial and literature review rather than an empirical study; its main contribution is the framework and the systematic mapping of existing tools onto that framework.

Significance. If read as a conceptual organizer, the framework has clear pedagogical and research-structuring value. The paper accurately summarizes several key prior results, including Juul and Ugander's cascade-size conditioning of fake-news diffusion, spectral clustering, and DeGroot/bounded-confidence opinion dynamics. It also connects recent developments in LLM-based content generation and detection to the framework. However, the paper uses prescriptive language ('optimal', 'mathematically optimized') that is not backed by an end-to-end validation of the proposed pipeline. The significance therefore depends on the paper's status as a research program rather than a deployable methodology; this ambiguity is the main weakness.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 1, Eq. (1); Section 6.1.2; Section 8] The paper alternates between presenting Eq. (1) as a conceptual lens for organizing the literature and as a prescriptive tool that yields 'mathematically optimized' interventions. The prescriptive reading is not supported by an end-to-end validation of the full pipeline, and Section 3.4 documents the loss of primary data sources (Twitter Research API, CrowdTangle) that would be needed to estimate the inputs. I request an explicit statement of the intended status of Eq. (1) and adjusted language: if the framework is a research program, then 'optimal' and 'mathematically optimized' should be clearly qualified as model-optimal or aspirational; if it is intended as deployable, a demonstration on a complete pipeline (from data to intervention) is needed.
  2. [Sections 1 and 5.3] The paper does not discuss identifiability of the inputs to Eq. (1). Since the network G, initial opinions theta0, and transition function f are estimated from partially observed data, multiple tuples (G, theta0, f) can be observationally equivalent, and the optimizer of Eq. (1) need not correspond to the true optimal intervention under the actual data-generating process. This is load-bearing for any prescriptive use of the framework. Please add a discussion of estimation uncertainty and non-identifiability, or explicitly restrict the claim to settings where the model class is known to be identified.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.2.3] The VADER sentiment tool is typeset as 'V ADER' in the text; please correct the spacing.
  2. [Section 5.1] The SI differential equations are written as mass-action compartmental equations, but the surrounding text says the model operates at both macro and micro levels and maps decision variables to network transmission parameters. Please clarify whether the network version or the compartmental version is intended in the context of Eq. (1).
  3. [Section 5.3] The Shapley value formula overloads the symbol e: in Eq. (1) e is a function of the opinion matrix Theta, whereas in the Shapley formula e(S) is a coalition value function. Please use a distinct symbol such as v(S) to avoid ambiguity.
  4. [Section 6.2.1] The expression for d e(Theta(t))/dt appears to be missing an index or gradient structure; as written, the derivative with respect to Theta_{j,t} is ambiguous because the right-hand side contains a sum over i. Please write the gradient explicitly.
  5. [Section 7.1 and References] Reference [31] has two authors (Chen and Zaman), so 'Chen et al.' in the text should be 'Chen and Zaman'. Additionally, reference [81] is corrupted (e.g., 'Maier D, W A, M P, ...') and should be replaced with the full, correct author list.
  6. [Figure 3 caption] The caption states that arrows indicate a retweet interaction, but the text does not specify the direction convention (who retweeted whom); please add one sentence clarifying this.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (1) is a deliberately general optimization definition, and the tutorial's cited results are independent prior derivations and empirical studies rather than self-supporting inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central contribution is the formal optimization framework in Eq. (1), in which the network, initial opinions, transition dynamics, and effectiveness function are all declared as inputs ('all of which must be estimated or inferred from data'). Since Eq. (1) is presented as a definitional modeling framework rather than as a derived empirical prediction, there is no derivation chain in which an output is equivalent to an input by construction. The narrative maps existing methods (centrality, community detection, diffusion and opinion models, moderation controls) onto components of this framework; mapping is not circular. The tutorial does lean on the authors' prior publications for specific results, notably Chen and Zaman [30,31] for nudging and shadow banning, Hunter and Zaman [60] for stubborn-agent optimization, and des Mesnards et al. [39] for bot detection. However, these are cited as completed, externally checkable derivations and field experiments (e.g., [131]), not as unverified premises that forbid alternatives; the paper does not import a uniqueness theorem or smuggle an ansatz through a citation. The acknowledged limitations—platform data-access restrictions (Section 3.4) and the need to estimate parameters from empirical studies (Section 5.3)—concern executability and external validity, not circularity. No prediction in the paper reduces to a fitted parameter, and no equation is equivalent to its own input by definition. The appropriate finding is therefore no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review and introduces no free parameters, new physical entities, or new mathematical objects. The axioms listed are standard modeling assumptions and external theorems inherited from the cited literature.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Social media interaction can be represented as a network G=(V,E) with user states Theta_i,t.
    Invoked in Section 1 to formulate the IO optimization problem (1); this is a standard modeling assumption in the literature.
  • domain assumption Opinion dynamics follow a specified state transition function f(.), e.g., DeGroot or bounded confidence models.
    Section 5.2 uses DeGroot (Eq. 3) and bounded confidence (Eq. 4); these are models adopted from prior work, not derived here.
  • standard math The effectiveness function e(Theta) is submodular for LT and IC diffusion models, enabling greedy approximation with (1-1/e) guarantee.
    Section 6.1.1 cites Kempe et al. [65]; this is an external theorem assumed without proof.
  • domain assumption Hawkes process intensity (Eq. 2) with exponential kernel models viral cascades.
    Section 5.1 introduces the intensity function as a modeling choice for self-exciting event processes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Social Media Information Operations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DFDKZ456

@misc{pith2026250801552,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Social Media Information Operations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DFDKZ456}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.01552}
}
read the original abstract

The battlefield of information warfare has moved to online social networks, where influence campaigns operate at unprecedented speed and scale. As with any strategic domain, success requires understanding the terrain, modeling adversaries, and executing interventions. This tutorial introduces a formal optimization framework for social media information operations (IO), where the objective is to shape opinions through targeted actions. This framework is parameterized by quantities such as network structure, user opinions, and activity levels - all of which must be estimated or inferred from data. We discuss analytic tools that support this process, including centrality measures for identifying influential users, clustering algorithms for detecting community structure, and sentiment analysis for gauging public opinion. These tools either feed directly into the optimization pipeline or help defense analysts interpret the information environment. With the landscape mapped, we highlight threats such as coordinated bot networks, extremist recruitment, and viral misinformation. Countermeasures range from content-level interventions to mathematically optimized influence strategies. Finally, the emergence of generative AI transforms both offense and defense, democratizing persuasive capabilities while enabling scalable defenses. This shift calls for algorithmic innovation, policy reform, and ethical vigilance to protect the integrity of our digital public sphere.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

133 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mathematics Of Operations Research 38(1):1–27

    Acemoglu D, Como G, Fagnani F, Ozdaglar A (2013) Opinion Fluctuations And Disagree- ment In Social Networks. Mathematics Of Operations Research 38(1):1–27

    2013

  2. [2]

    Dynamic Games And Applications 1:3–49

    Acemoglu D, Ozdaglar A (2011) Opinion Dynamics And Learning In Social Networks. Dynamic Games And Applications 1:3–49

    2011

  3. [3]

    (2023) Gpt-4 Technical Report.Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2303.08774

    Achiam J, Adler S, Agarwal S, Ahmad L, Akkaya I, Aleman FL, Almeida D, Altenschmidt J, Altman S, Anadkat S, et al. (2023) Gpt-4 Technical Report.Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2303.08774

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Proceedings Of The 3Rd International Workshop On Link Discovery , 36–43 (ACM)

    Adamic LA, Glance N (2005) The Political Blogosphere And The 2004 Us Election: Divided They Blog. Proceedings Of The 3Rd International Workshop On Link Discovery , 36–43 (ACM). Zaman and Chen:Social Media Information Operations 39

    2005

  5. [5]

    CVPR Workshops , volume 1

    Agarwal S, Farid H, Gu Y, He M, Nagano K, Li H (2019) Protecting World Leaders Against Deep Fakes. CVPR Workshops , volume 1

    2019

  6. [6]

    https://www

    Alaphilippe A (2020) Adding a ‘D’ to the ABC Disinformation Framework. https://www. brookings.edu/articles/adding-a-d-to-the-abc-disinformation-framework/

    2020

  7. [7]

    Information Processing & Management 58(4):102597, ISSN 0306-4573, URL http://dx

    ALDayel A, Magdy W (2021) Stance Detection on Social Media: State of the Art and Trends. Information Processing & Management 58(4):102597, ISSN 0306-4573, URL http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102597

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    American Economic Review 110(3):629–676

    Allcott H, Braghieri L, Eichmeyer S, Gentzkow M (2020) The Welfare Effects Of Social Media. American Economic Review 110(3):629–676

    2020

Show all 133 references
  1. [9]

    2018 15Th International Conference On Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Com- puter, Telecommunications And Information Technology (Ecti-Con) , 528–531 (IEEE)

    Aphiwongsophon S, Chongstitvatana P (2018) Detecting Fake News With Machine Learning Method. 2018 15Th International Conference On Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Com- puter, Telecommunications And Information Technology (Ecti-Con) , 528–531 (IEEE)

    2018

  2. [10]

    a Minority Of One Against a Unanimous Majority

    Asch SE (1956) Studies Of Independence And Conformity: I. a Minority Of One Against a Unanimous Majority. Psychological Monographs: General And Applied 70(9):1

    1956

  3. [11]

    A ¨ ımeur E, Amri S, Brassard G (2023) Fake News, Disinformation And Misinformation In Social Media: A Review. Social Network Analysis And Mining 13(1):1–36, ISSN 1869-5469, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01028-5 , company: Springer Distributor: Springer Institution:...

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    Journal Of Computational Social Science 1(2):453–470

    Badawy A, Ferrara E (2018) The Rise Of Jihadist Propaganda On Social Networks. Journal Of Computational Social Science 1(2):453–470

    2018

  5. [13]

    2018 Ieee/Acm International Con- ference On Advances In Social Networks Analysis And Mining (Asonam) , 258–265 (IEEE)

    Badawy A, Ferrara E, Lerman K (2018) Analyzing The Digital Traces Of Political Manipu- lation: The 2016 Russian Interference Twitter Campaign. 2018 Ieee/Acm International Con- ference On Advances In Social Networks Analysis And Mining (Asonam) , 258–265 (IEEE)

    2018

  6. [14]

    https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3238396/v1

    Bai H, Voelkel J, Eichstaedt J, Willer R (2023) Artificial Intelligence Can Persuade Humans On Political Issues. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3238396/v1

    2023 doi

  7. [15]

    Bail CA (2024) Can Generative AI Improve Social Science? Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 121(21):e2314021121

    2024

  8. [16]

    Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 115(37):9216–9221

    Bail CA, Argyle LP, Brown TW, Bumpus JP, Chen H, Hunzaker MB, Lee J, Mann M, Merhout F, Volfovsky A (2018) Exposure To Opposing Views On Social Media Can Increase Political Polarization. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 115(37):9216–9221

    2018

  9. [17]

    Science 348(6239):1130–1132

    Bakshy E, Messing S, Adamic LA (2015) Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook. Science 348(6239):1130–1132

    2015

  10. [18]

    Plos One 12(12):e0181405

    Benigni MC, Joseph K, Carley KM (2017) Online Extremism and the Communities that Sustain It: Detecting the ISIS Supporting Community on twitter. Plos One 12(12):e0181405. Zaman and Chen:Social Media Information Operations 40

    2017

  11. [19]

    The Brookings Project On U.S

    Berger JM, Morgan J (2015) The ISIS twitter Census: Defining and Describing the Population of ISIS Supporters on Twitter. The Brookings Project On U.S. Relations With The Islamic World

    2015

  12. [20]

    Automatica 159:111302, ISSN 00051098, URL http://dx.doi.org/10

    Bernardo C, Altafini C, Proskurnikov A, Vasca F (2024) Bounded Confidence Opinion Dynamics: a Survey. Automatica 159:111302, ISSN 00051098, URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.automatica.2023.111302

    2024

  13. [21]

    Journal Of Statistical Mechanics: Theory And Experiment 2008(10):P10008

    Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008) Fast Unfolding Of Com- munities In Large Networks. Journal Of Statistical Mechanics: Theory And Experiment 2008(10):P10008

    2008

  14. [22]

    IEEE transactions on Automatic Control 54(11):2586– 2597

    Blondel VD, Hendrickx JM, Tsitsiklis JN (2009) On Krause’s multi-agent consensus model with state-dependent connectivity. IEEE transactions on Automatic Control 54(11):2586– 2597

    2009

  15. [23]

    (2019) The DARPA Socialsim Challenge: Massive Multi- Agent Simulations Of The Github Ecosystem

    Blythe J, Ferrara E, Huang D, Lerman K, Muric G, Sapienza A, Tregubov A, Pacheco D, Bollenbacher J, Flammini A, et al. (2019) The DARPA Socialsim Challenge: Massive Multi- Agent Simulations Of The Github Ecosystem. AAMAS, 1835–1837

    2019

  16. [24]

    Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sci- ences 119(48):e2216035119, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216035119, pub- lisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    Bohacek M, Farid H (2022) Protecting World Leaders Against Deep Fakes Using Facial, Gestural, And Vocal Mannerisms. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sci- ences 119(48):e2216035119, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2216035119, pub- lisher: Proceedings of the National Ac...

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    American Journal Of Sociology 92(5):1170–1182

    Bonacich P (1987) Power And Centrality: A Family Of Measures. American Journal Of Sociology 92(5):1170–1182

    1987

  18. [26]

    Arxiv Preprint Physics/0608255

    Brandes U, Delling D, Gaertler M, G¨ orke R, Hoefer M, Nikoloski Z, Wagner D (2006) Max- imizing Modularity Is Hard. Arxiv Preprint Physics/0608255

    2006

  19. [27]

    (2020) Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners

    Brown T, Mann B, Ryder N, Subbiah M, Kaplan JD, Dhariwal P, Neelakantan A, Shyam P, Sastry G, Askell A, et al. (2020) Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners. Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems 33:1877–1901

    2020

  20. [28]

    Chen W, Wang C, Wang Y (2010) Scalable Influence Maximization For Prevalent Viral Marketing In Large-Scale Social Networks. Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGKDD inter- national conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining , 1029–1038, KDD ’10 (New York, NY, USA: Association...

    2010

  21. [29]

    Pro- ceedings Of The 15Th ACM SIGKDD International Conference On Knowledge Discovery And Data Mining , 199–208

    Chen W, Wang Y, Yang S (2009) Efficient Influence Maximization In Social Networks. Pro- ceedings Of The 15Th ACM SIGKDD International Conference On Knowledge Discovery And Data Mining , 199–208. Zaman and Chen:Social Media Information Operations 41

    2009

  22. [30]

    Plos One 19(3):e0299977

    Chen YS, Zaman T (2024) Shaping Opinions in Social Networks with Shadow Banning. Plos One 19(3):e0299977

    2024

  23. [31]

    Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2503.18331

    Chen YS, Zaman T (2025) Optimizing Influence Campaigns: Nudging under Bounded Con- fidence. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2503.18331

    2025 arXiv

  24. [33]

    2014 IEEE International Conference On Big Data (Big Data), 393–401 (IEEE)

    Compton R, Jurgens D, Allen D (2014) Geotagging One Hundred Million Twitter Accounts With Total Variation Minimization. 2014 IEEE International Conference On Big Data (Big Data), 393–401 (IEEE)

    2014

  25. [34]

    Science 385(6714):eadq1814

    Costello TH, Pennycook G, Rand DG (2024) Durably Reducing Conspiracy Beliefs Through Dialogues With AI. Science 385(6714):eadq1814

    2024

  26. [35]

    Proceedings Of The 25Th International Conference Companion On World Wide Web , 273–274

    Davis CA, Varol O, Ferrara E, Flammini A, Menczer F (2016) Botornot: A System To Evaluate Social Bots. Proceedings Of The 25Th International Conference Companion On World Wide Web , 273–274

    2016

  27. [36]

    Dynamic Games And Applications 14(4):959–980, ISSN 2153-0793, URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13235-023-00543-6

    de Vos W, Borm P, Hamers H (2024) Influencing Opinion Networks: Optimization and Games. Dynamic Games And Applications 14(4):959–980, ISSN 2153-0793, URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13235-023-00543-6

    2024 doi

  28. [37]

    Advances In Complex Systems 3:87–98

    Deffuant G, Neau D, Amblard F, Weisbuch G (2001) Mixing Beliefs Among Interacting Agents. Advances In Complex Systems 3:87–98

    2001

  29. [38]

    Journal Of The American Statistical Association 69(345):118–121

    DeGroot MH (1974) Reaching a Consensus. Journal Of The American Statistical Association 69(345):118–121

    1974

  30. [39]

    Operations Research 70(1):1–22

    des Mesnards NG, Hunter DS, el Hjouji Z, Zaman T (2022) Detecting Bots And Assessing Their Impact In Social Networks. Operations Research 70(1):1–22

    2022

  31. [40]

    Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1810.04805

    Devlin J, Chang MW, Lee K, Toutanova K (2018) BERT: Pre-Training Of Deep Bidirectional Transformers For Language Understanding. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1810.04805

    2018 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Feminist Media Studies 20(8):1319–1323

    Drenten J, Brooks G (2020) Celebrity 2.0: Lil Miquela And The Rise Of a Virtual Star System. Feminist Media Studies 20(8):1319–1323

    2020

  33. [42]

    Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 2 , volume 2 of NIPS’13, 3147–3155 (Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc.)

    Du N, Song L, Gomez-Rodriguez M, Zha H (2013) Scalable Influence Estimation In Continuous-Time Diffusion Networks. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems - Volume 2 , volume 2 of NIPS’13, 3147–3155 (Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran A...

    2013

  34. [43]

    Combating Fake News With Computational Intelligence Techniques, 149–162 (Springer)

    Elyassami S, Alseiari S, ALZaabi M, Hashem A, Aljahoori N (2021) Fake News Detection Using Ensemble Learning And Machine Learning Algorithms. Combating Fake News With Computational Intelligence Techniques, 149–162 (Springer). Zaman and Chen:Social Media Information Operations 42

    2021

  35. [44]

    Farajtabar M, Du N, Gomez-Rodriguez M, Valera I, Zha H, Song L (2014) Shaping Social Activity by Incentivizing Users. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol- ume 27 (Curran Associates, Inc.), URL https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/ 2014/hash/5bce7b2ded63...

    2014

  36. [45]

    Proceedings of the 34th International Con- ference on Machine Learning - Volume 70 , 1097–1106, ICML’17 (Sydney, NSW, Australia: JMLR.org)

    Farajtabar M, Yang J, Ye X, Xu H, Trivedi R, Khalil E, Li S, Song L, Zha H (2017) Fake News Mitigation Via Point Process Based Intervention. Proceedings of the 34th International Con- ference on Machine Learning - Volume 70 , 1097–1106, ICML’17 (Sydney, NSW, Australia: JMLR.org)

    2017

  37. [46]

    Communications Of The ACM 59(7):96–104

    Ferrara E, Varol O, Davis C, Menczer F, Flammini A (2016) The Rise Of Social Bots. Communications Of The ACM 59(7):96–104

    2016

  38. [47]

    Human Relations 7(2):117– 140

    Festinger L (1954) A Theory Of Social Comparison Processes. Human Relations 7(2):117– 140

    1954

  39. [48]

    Physics Reports 486(3–5):75–174

    Fortunato S (2010) Community Detection In Graphs. Physics Reports 486(3–5):75–174

    2010

  40. [49]

    Algo- rithms URL https://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/ ABC_Framework_TWG_Francois_Sept_2019.pdf

    Fran¸ cois C (2020) Actors, Behaviors, Content: A Disinformation ABC. Algo- rithms URL https://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/ ABC_Framework_TWG_Francois_Sept_2019.pdf

    2020

  41. [50]

    Sociometry 35–41

    Freeman LC (1977) A Set Of Measures Of Centrality Based On Betweenness. Sociometry 35–41

    1977

  42. [51]

    American Journal Of Political Science 67(1):5–21, ISSN 1540-5907, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12610, eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ajps.12610

    Galasso V, Nannicini T, Nunnari S (2023) Positive Spillovers from Neg- ative Campaigning. American Journal Of Political Science 67(1):5–21, ISSN 1540-5907, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12610, eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ajps.12610

    2023 doi

  43. [52]

    Proceed- ings Of The 2018 World Wide Web Conference , 913–922

    Garimella K, De Francisci Morales G, Gionis A, Mathioudakis M (2018) Political Discourse On Social Media: Echo Chambers, Gatekeepers, And The Price Of Bipartisanship. Proceed- ings Of The 2018 World Wide Web Conference , 913–922

    2018

  44. [53]

    American Control Conference (Acc), 2013, 1982–1987 (IEEE)

    Ghaderi J, Srikant R (2013) Opinion Dynamics In Social Networks: A Local Interaction Game With Stubborn Agents. American Control Conference (Acc), 2013, 1982–1987 (IEEE)

    2013

  45. [54]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04246, arXiv:2301.04246 [cs]

    Goldstein JA, Sastry G, Musser M, DiResta R, Gentzel M, Sedova K (2023) Generative Lan- guage Models and Automated Influence Operations: Emerging Threats and Potential Miti- gations. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.04246, arXiv:2301.04246 [cs]

    2023 doi arXiv

  46. [55]

    (2023) How Do Social Media Feed Algorithms Affect Attitudes And Behavior In An Election Campaign? Science 381(6656):398–404

    Guess AM, Malhotra N, Pan J, Barber´ a P, Allcott H, Brown T, Crespo-Tenorio A, Dimmery D, Freelon D, Gentzkow M, et al. (2023) How Do Social Media Feed Algorithms Affect Attitudes And Behavior In An Election Campaign? Science 381(6656):398–404

    2023

  47. [56]

    IEEE Transactions On Computer-Aided Design Of Integrated Circuits And Systems 11(9):1074–1085

    Hagen L, Kahng AB (1992) New Spectral Methods For Ratio Cut Partitioning And Clus- tering. IEEE Transactions On Computer-Aided Design Of Integrated Circuits And Systems 11(9):1074–1085. Zaman and Chen:Social Media Information Operations 43

    1992

  48. [57]

    Journal Of Artificial Societies And Social Simulation 18(3):1–18

    Hegselmann R, K¨ onig S, Kurz S, Niemann C, Rambau J (2015) Optimal Opinion Control: The Campaign Problem. Journal Of Artificial Societies And Social Simulation 18(3):1–18

    2015

  49. [58]

    Journal Of Artificial Societies And Social Simulation 5(3):1–33

    Hegselmann R, Krause U (2002) Opinion Dynamics And Bounded Confidence: Models, Anal- ysis And Simulation. Journal Of Artificial Societies And Social Simulation 5(3):1–33

    2002

  50. [59]

    Pro- ceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 102(46):16569–16572

    Hirsch JE (2005) An Index To Quantify An Individual’s Scientific Research Output. Pro- ceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 102(46):16569–16572

    2005

  51. [60]

    Operations Research 70(4):2119–2137

    Hunter DS, Zaman T (2022) Optimizing Opinions With Stubborn Agents. Operations Research 70(4):2119–2137

    2022

  52. [61]

    Eighth International Aaai Conference On Weblogs And Social Media

    Hutto C, Gilbert E (2014) Vader: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model For Sentiment Analysis Of Social Media Text. Eighth International Aaai Conference On Weblogs And Social Media

    2014

  53. [62]

    Journal Of Communication 59(1):19–39

    Iyengar S, Hahn KS (2009) Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence Of Ideological Selectivity In Media Use. Journal Of Communication 59(1):19–39

    2009

  54. [63]

    First Monday ISSN 1396-0466, URL http://dx

    Jurafsky D, Chahuneau V, Routledge BR, Smith NA (2014) Narrative Framing Of Consumer Sentiment In Online Restaurant Reviews. First Monday ISSN 1396-0466, URL http://dx. doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i4.4944

    2014 doi

  55. [64]

    Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 118(46):e2100786118

    Juul J, Ugander J (2021) Comparing Information Diffusion Mechanisms By Matching On Cascade Size. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 118(46):e2100786118

    2021

  56. [65]

    Proceedings Of The Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference On Knowledge Discovery And Data Mining , 137–146 (ACM)

    Kempe D, Kleinberg J, Tardos ´E (2003) Maximizing The Spread Of Influence Through a Social Network. Proceedings Of The Ninth ACM SIGKDD International Conference On Knowledge Discovery And Data Mining , 137–146 (ACM)

    2003

  57. [66]

    Oper- ations Research 66(4):957–976

    Klausen J, Marks CE, Zaman T (2018) Finding Extremists In Online Social Networks. Oper- ations Research 66(4):957–976

    2018

  58. [67]

    Kong Q, Calderon P, Ram R, Boichak O, Rizoiu MA (2023) Interval-censored Transformer Hawkes: Detecting Information Operations using the Reaction of Social Systems. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023 , 1813–1821, WWW ’23 (New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Mac...

    2023

  59. [68]

    The Journal Of Mathematical Sociol- ogy 46(2):120–147, ISSN 0022-250X, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2020

    Kozitsin IV (2022) Formal Models Of Opinion Formation And Their Application To Real Data: Evidence From Online Social Networks. The Journal Of Mathematical Sociol- ogy 46(2):120–147, ISSN 0022-250X, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2020. 1835894, place: PHILADELPHIA Publ...

    2022 doi

  60. [69]

    (2024) Toolbox Of Individual-Level Interventions Against Online Misinformation

    Kozyreva A, Lorenz-Spreen P, Herzog SM, Ecker UK, Lewandowsky S, Hertwig R, Ali A, Bak-Coleman J, Barzilai S, Basol M, et al. (2024) Toolbox Of Individual-Level Interventions Against Online Misinformation. Nature Human Behaviour 8(6):1044–1052. Zaman and Chen:Social Media Info...

    2024

  61. [70]

    Proceedings Of The 22Nd Inter- national Conference On World Wide Web , 1343–1350 (ACM)

    Kunegis J (2013) Konect: The Koblenz Network Collection. Proceedings Of The 22Nd Inter- national Conference On World Wide Web , 1343–1350 (ACM)

    2013

  62. [71]

    International Journal Of Consumer Studies 47(6):2479–2494

    Laszkiewicz A, Kalinska-Kula M (2023) Virtual Influencers As An Emerging Market- ing Theory: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal Of Consumer Studies 47(6):2479–2494

    2023

  63. [72]

    Lei S, Maniu S, Mo L, Cheng R, Senellart P (2015) Online Influence Maximization. Proceed- ings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 645–654, KDD ’15 (New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery), ISBN 978-1-4503-366...

    2015

  64. [73]

    Acm Trans

    Leskovec J, Adamic LA, Huberman BA (2007) The Dynamics Of Viral Marketing. Acm Trans. Web 1(1):5–es, ISSN 1559-1131, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1232722. 1232727

    2007 doi

  65. [74]

    http://snap.stanford.edu/data

    Leskovec J, Krevl A (2014) SNAP Datasets: Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection. http://snap.stanford.edu/data

    2014

  66. [75]

    Wiil UK, ed., Counterterrorism and Open Source Intel- ligence, 61–72 (Vienna: Springer), ISBN 978-3-7091-0388-3, URL http://dx.doi.org/10

    Lindelauf R, Borm P, Hamers H (2011) Understanding Terrorist Network Topologies and Their Resilience Against Disruption. Wiil UK, ed., Counterterrorism and Open Source Intel- ligence, 61–72 (Vienna: Springer), ISBN 978-3-7091-0388-3, URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-7091-0388-3_5

    2011

  67. [76]

    European Journal Of Operational Research 229(1):230–238, ISSN 03772217, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ejor.2013.02.032

    Lindelauf R, Hamers H, Husslage B (2013) Cooperative game theoretic centrality analysis of terrorist networks: The cases of Jemaah Islamiyah and Al Qaeda. European Journal Of Operational Research 229(1):230–238, ISSN 03772217, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ejor.2013.02.032

    2013

  68. [77]

    Journal Of Artificial Societies And Social Simulation 9(1)

    Lorenz J (2006) Consensus Strikes Back In The Hegselmann–Krause Model Of Continuous Opinion Dynamics Under Bounded Confidence. Journal Of Artificial Societies And Social Simulation 9(1)

    2006

  69. [78]

    Luceri L, Boniardi E, Ferrara E (2024) Leveraging Large Language Models to Detect Influence Campaigns on Social Media. Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024 , 1459–1467, WWW ’24 (New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery), ISBN 9798400701726, URL ht...

    2024

  70. [79]

    Luceri L, Pant` e V, Burghardt K, Ferrara E (2024) Unmasking the Web of Deceit: Uncov- ering Coordinated Activity to Expose Information Operations on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024 , 2530–2541, WWW ’24 (New York, NY, USA: Associa- tion for Computing Machin...

    2024

  71. [80]

    2020 Southeastcon , 1–2 (IEEE)

    Lyu S, Lo DCT (2020) Fake News Detection By Decision Tree. 2020 Southeastcon , 1–2 (IEEE)

    2020

  72. [81]

    Maier D, W A, M P, W G, N A, K A, P B, H G, R U, H T, SP H, , Adam S (2018) Applying LDA Topic Modeling in Communication Research: Toward a Valid and Reliable Methodology. Communication Methods And Measures 12(2-3):93–118, ISSN 1931-2458, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19312458...

    2018

  73. [82]

    Operations Research 70(6):3090–3107

    Marks CE, Zaman T (2022) Building a Location-Based Set Of Social Media Users. Operations Research 70(6):3090–3107

    2022

  74. [83]

    Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2310.06824

    Marks S, Tegmark M (2023) The Geometry Of Truth: Emergent Linear Structure In Large Language Model Representations Of True/False Datasets. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2310.06824

    2023 arXiv

  75. [84]

    New Journal Of Physics 17(3):033031

    Masuda N (2015) Opinion Control In Complex Networks. New Journal Of Physics 17(3):033031

    2015

  76. [85]

    Annual Review Of Sociology 27:415–444

    McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds Of a Feather: Homophily In Social Networks. Annual Review Of Sociology 27:415–444

    2001

  77. [86]

    Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1810.12398

    Mesnards NGd, Hunter DS, Hjouji Ze, Zaman T (2018) Detecting Bots And Assessing Their Impact In Social Networks. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1810.12398

    2018 arXiv

  78. [87]

    Proceedings Of The Aaai Conference On Artifi- cial Intelligence 39(27):28258–28266, ISSN 2374-3468, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/ aaai.v39i27.35046, number: 27

    Minici M, Luceri L, Fabbri F, Ferrara E (2025) IOHunter: Graph Foundation Model to Uncover Online Information Operations. Proceedings Of The Aaai Conference On Artifi- cial Intelligence 39(27):28258–28266, ISSN 2374-3468, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/ aaai.v39i27.35046, number: 27

    2025

  79. [88]

    Journal Of Statistical Mechanics: Theory And Experiment 2007(08):P08029

    Mobilia M, Petersen AE, Redner S (2007) Role Of Zealotry In The Voter Model. Journal Of Statistical Mechanics: Theory And Experiment 2007(08):P08029

    2007

  80. [89]

    Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1902.06673

    Monti F, Frasca F, Eynard D, Mannion D, Bronstein MM (2019) Fake News Detection On Social Media Using Geometric Deep Learning. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1902.06673

    2019 arXiv

  81. [90]

    (2019) The Mueller Report: Complete Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election (e-artnow)

    Mueller RS, et al. (2019) The Mueller Report: Complete Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election (e-artnow)

    2019

  82. [91]

    Political Behavior 39:629–649

    Munger K (2017) Tweetment Effects On The Tweeted: Experimentally Reducing Racist Harassment. Political Behavior 39:629–649

    2017

  83. [92]

    Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 103(23):8577–8582

    Newman ME (2006) Modularity And Community Structure In Networks. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 103(23):8577–8582

    2006

  84. [93]

    Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems 14

    Ng A, Jordan M, Weiss Y (2001) On Spectral Clustering: Analysis And An Algorithm. Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems 14. Zaman and Chen:Social Media Information Operations 46

    2001

  85. [94]

    Review Of General Psychology 2(2):175–220

    Nickerson RS (1998) Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon In Many Guises. Review Of General Psychology 2(2):175–220

    1998

  86. [95]

    Political Behavior 32(2):303–330, ISSN 1573-6687, URL http://dx.doi.org/10

    Nyhan B, Reifler J (2010) When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misper- ceptions. Political Behavior 32(2):303–330, ISSN 1573-6687, URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s11109-010-9112-2

    2010

  87. [96]

    (2023) Like-Minded Sources On Facebook Are Prevalent But Not Polarizing

    Nyhan B, Settle J, Thorson E, Wojcieszak M, Barber´ a P, Chen AY, Allcott H, Brown T, Crespo-Tenorio A, Dimmery D, et al. (2023) Like-Minded Sources On Facebook Are Prevalent But Not Polarizing. Nature 620(7972):137–144

    2023

  88. [97]

    https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/, URL https: //openai.com/index/chatgpt/, accessed: 2025-04-13

    OpenAI (2022) Introducing Chatgpt. https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/, URL https: //openai.com/index/chatgpt/, accessed: 2025-04-13

    2022

  89. [98]

    American Journal Of Sociology 98(6):1259–1319

    Padgett JF, Ansell CK (1993) Robust Action And The Rise Of The Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal Of Sociology 98(6):1259–1319

    1993

  90. [99]

    Stanford Infolab

    Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T (1999) The Pagerank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order To The Web. Stanford Infolab

    1999

  91. [100]

    Technical report, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, URL https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26180.6

    Pamment J (2020) The ABCDE Framework. Technical report, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, URL https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26180.6

    2020

  92. [101]

    Park JS, O’Brien J, Cai CJ, Morris MR, Liang P, Bernstein MS (2023) Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra Of Human Behavior.Proceedings Of The 36Th Annual Acm Symposium On User Interface Software And Technology , 1–22

    2023

  93. [102]

    Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2411.10109

    Park JS, Zou CQ, Shaw A, Hill BM, Cai C, Morris MR, Willer R, Liang P, Bernstein MS (2024) Generative Agent Simulations Of 1,000 People. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2411.10109

    2024 arXiv

  94. [103]

    Nature 592(7855):590–595

    Pennycook G, Epstein Z, Mosleh M, Arechar AA, Eckles D, Rand DG (2021) Shifting Atten- tion To Accuracy Can Reduce Misinformation Online. Nature 592(7855):590–595

    2021

  95. [104]

    Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sci- ences 116(7):2521–2526

    Pennycook G, Rand DG (2019) Fighting Misinformation On Social Media Using Crowd- sourced Judgments Of News Source Quality. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sci- ences 116(7):2521–2526

    2019

  96. [105]

    Pr¨ ollochs N (2022) Community-Based Fact-Checking On Twitter’s Birdwatch Platform.Pro- ceedings Of The International AAAI Conference On Web And Social Media , volume 16, 794–805

    2022

  97. [106]

    (2021) Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Super- vision

    Radford A, Kim JW, Hallacy C, Ramesh A, Goh G, Agarwal S, Sastry G, Askell A, Mishkin P, Clark J, et al. (2021) Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Super- vision. International Conference On Machine Learning , 8748–8763 (PmLR)

    2021

  98. [107]

    (2018) Improving Language Understanding By Generative Pre-Training

    Radford A, Narasimhan K, Salimans T, Sutskever I, et al. (2018) Improving Language Understanding By Generative Pre-Training. https://cdn.openai.com/research-covers/ language-unsupervised/language_understanding_paper.pdf. Zaman and Chen:Social Media Information Operations 47

    2018

  99. [108]

    Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2204.06125 1(2):3

    Ramesh A, Dhariwal P, Nichol A, Chu C, Chen M (2022) Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation With Clip Latents. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:2204.06125 1(2):3

    2022 arXiv

  100. [109]

    International Conference On Machine Learning, 8821–8831 (Pmlr)

    Ramesh A, Pavlov M, Goh G, Gray S, Voss C, Radford A, Chen M, Sutskever I (2021) Zero- Shot Text-To-Image Generation. International Conference On Machine Learning, 8821–8831 (Pmlr)

    2021

  101. [110]

    Ribeiro MH, Ottoni R, West R, Almeida V AF, Meira W (2020) Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 131–141, F AT* ’20 (New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machin- ery), ISBN 978-1-4...

    2020

  102. [111]

    Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1708.06401

    Rizoiu MA, Lee Y, Mishra S, Xie L, Caetano TS, Lepri B (2017) A Tutorial On Hawkes Processes For Events In Social Media. Arxiv Preprint Arxiv:1708.06401

    2017 arXiv

  103. [112]

    Rocklage MD, He S, Rucker DD, Nordgren LF (2023) Beyond Sentiment: The Value and Measurement of Consumer Certainty in Language.Journal Of Marketing Research 60(5):870– 888, ISSN 0022-2437, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00222437221134802, publisher: SAGE Publications Inc

    2023 doi

  104. [113]

    Plos One 18(5):e0283971

    Rossetti M, Zaman T (2023) Bots, Disinformation, And The First Impeachment Of US President Donald Trump. Plos One 18(5):e0283971

    2023

  105. [114]

    Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume 29

    Rossi R, Ahmed N (2015) The network data repository with interactive graph analytics and visualization. Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence , volume 29

    2015

  106. [115]

    Psychometrika 31(4):581–603

    Sabidussi G (1966) The Centrality Index Of a Graph. Psychometrika 31(4):581–603

    1966

  107. [116]

    Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 120(34):e2307360120, URL http://dx

    Schneider PJ, Rizoiu MA (2023) The Effectiveness Of Moderating Harmful Online Content. Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences 120(34):e2307360120, URL http://dx. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2307360120, publisher: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    2023 doi

  108. [117]

    URL http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2411.10609, arXiv:2411.10609 [cs]

    Seckin OC, Pote M, Nwala A, Yin L, Luceri L, Flammini A, Menczer F (2024) Labeled Datasets for Research on Information Operations. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2411.10609, arXiv:2411.10609 [cs]

    2024 doi arXiv

  109. [118]

    Shah D, Zaman T (2011) Rumors In a Network: Who’s The Culprit? IEEE Transactions On Information Theory 57(8):5163–5181

    2011

  110. [119]

    Operations Research 64(3):736–755

    Shah D, Zaman T (2016) Finding Rumor Sources On Random Trees. Operations Research 64(3):736–755

    2016

  111. [120]

    IEEE Transactions On Pattern Analysis And Machine Intelligence 22(8):888–905

    Shi J, Malik J (2000) Normalized Cuts And Image Segmentation. IEEE Transactions On Pattern Analysis And Machine Intelligence 22(8):888–905

    2000

  112. [121]

    ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 19(1):22–36

    Shu K, Sliva A, Wang S, Tang J, Liu H (2017) Fake News Detection On Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 19(1):22–36. Zaman and Chen:Social Media Information Operations 48

    2017

  113. [122]

    (2024) AI Can Help Humans Find Common Ground In Democratic Deliberation

    Tessler MH, Bakker MA, Jarrett D, Sheahan H, Chadwick MJ, Koster R, Evans G, Campbell- Gillingham L, Collins T, Parkes DC, et al. (2024) AI Can Help Humans Find Common Ground In Democratic Deliberation. Science 386(6719):eadq2852

    2024

  114. [123]

    Thaler RH, Sunstein CR (2009) Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Hap- piness (Penguin)

    2009

  115. [124]

    Trujillo A, Fagni T, Cresci S (2025) The DSA Transparency Database: Auditing Self-reported Moderation Actions by Social Media. Proc. Acm Hum.-Comput. Interact. 9(2):CSCW187:1– CSCW187:28, URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3711085

    2025 doi

  116. [125]

    IEEE Transactions On Control Of Network Systems 1(1):109–120

    Vassio L, Fagnani F, Frasca P, Ozdaglar A (2014) Message Passing Optimization Of Harmonic Influence Centrality. IEEE Transactions On Control Of Network Systems 1(1):109–120

    2014

  117. [126]

    Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 30

    Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez AN, Kaiser L, Polosukhin I (2017) Attention Is All You Need. Advances In Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 30

    2017

  118. [127]

    Statistics And Computing 17(4):395–416

    Von Luxburg U (2007) A Tutorial On Spectral Clustering. Statistics And Computing 17(4):395–416

    2007

  119. [128]

    Science 359(6380):1146–1151

    Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S (2018) The Spread Of True And False News Online. Science 359(6380):1146–1151

    2018

  120. [129]

    Mathematical Founda- tions of Computer Science 1993: 18th International Symposium, MFCS’93 Gda´ nsk, Poland, August 30–September 3, 1993 Proceedings 18 , 744–750 (Springer)

    Wagner D, Wagner F (1993) Between Min Cut And Graph Bisection. Mathematical Founda- tions of Computer Science 1993: 18th International Symposium, MFCS’93 Gda´ nsk, Poland, August 30–September 3, 1993 Proceedings 18 , 744–750 (Springer)

    1993

  121. [130]

    https: //www.reddit.com/r/pushshift/comments/1akrhg3/separate_dump_files_for_the_ top_40k_subreddits/

    Watchful1 (2024) Subreddit Comments/Submissions 2005-06 To 2023-12. https: //www.reddit.com/r/pushshift/comments/1akrhg3/separate_dump_files_for_the_ top_40k_subreddits/

    2024

  122. [131]

    Yang Q, Qureshi K, Zaman T (2022) Mitigating The Backfire Effect Using Pacing And Leading. Complex Networks & Their Applications X: Volume 2, Proceedings Of The Tenth International Conference On Complex Networks And Their Applications Complex Networks 2021 10 , 156–165 (Springer)

    2022

  123. [132]

    Yuan L, Schneider PJ, Rizoiu MA (2025) Behavioral Homophily in Social Media via Inverse Reinforcement Learning: A Reddit Case Study. Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2025, 576–589, WWW ’25 (New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery), ISBN 9798400712746, UR...

    2025

  124. [133]

    The Annals Of Applied Statistics 8(3):1583–1611

    Zaman T, Fox EB, Bradlow ET (2014) A Bayesian Approach For Predicting The Popularity Of Tweets. The Annals Of Applied Statistics 8(3):1583–1611

    2014

  125. [134]

    Zarezade A, De A, Upadhyay U, Rabiee HR, Gomez-Rodriguez M (2017) Steering Social Activity: A Stochastic Optimal Control Point Of View. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18(1):7512– 7546, ISSN 1532-4435

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.