Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

SEADialogues: A Multilingual Culturally Grounded Multi-turn Dialogue Dataset on Southeast Asian Languages

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper introduces SEADialogues, a multi-turn dialogue dataset in eight Southeast Asian languages with persona attributes and culturally grounded topics, aimed at making conversational agents culturally aware.

desk verdict The abstract promises a useful SEA dialogue dataset, but the supplied full text is an unrelated diet-problem paper, so nothing can be verified as submitted. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.07069 v1 pith:N5VCEVFO submitted 2025-08-09 cs.CL cs.AI

Muhammad Dehan Al Kautsar , Aswin Candra , Muhammad Alif Al Hakim , Maxalmina Satria Kahfi , Fajri Koto , Alham Fikri Aji , Peerat Limkonchotiwat , Ekapol Chuangsuwanich
show 1 more author
Genta Indra Winata
This is my paper
classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords multilingualdialoguedatasetSoutheastAsianlanguagesculturalgroundingpersonamulti-turnlow-resourceconversationalAIculturallyawarelanguagemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

SEADialogues is a new multilingual dialogue resource centered on Southeast Asia, covering eight languages from six countries. Each multi-turn dialogue comes with persona attributes and two culturally grounded topics meant to reflect everyday life in the relevant communities. The paper argues that existing chit-chat datasets overlook cultural nuance, leaving a gap that this dataset fills, especially for low-resource languages with large speaker populations. If the resource is sound, it would give researchers a way to train and evaluate conversational agents that are culturally aware and human-centric.

What carries the argument

The dataset is the central object: a multi-turn dialogue corpus with per-dialogue persona attributes and two culturally grounded topics. The persona attributes support personalization, and the culturally grounded topics anchor each conversation in everyday life in a specific community; together they are the mechanism by which the paper attempts to make chit-chat dialogues culture-specific.

What would settle it

A native-speaker audit of a random sample of dialogues that finds the 'cultural topics' appear only as surface-level mentions (e.g., a single sentence naming a food or festival) and that removing them leaves the dialogue's substance unchanged would falsify the claim of cultural grounding. Alternatively, if checking the files shows most 'multi-turn' dialogues are just one exchange, the multi-turn claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims to have created SEADialogues, a culturally grounded dialogue dataset centered on Southeast Asia. The dataset spans eight languages across six Southeast Asian countries, including low-resource languages with sizable speaker populations. Each dialogue is multi-turn and is annotated with persona attributes and two culturally grounded topics that reflect everyday life in the respective communities. The central contribution is the dataset itself, released to advance research on culturally aware and human-centric large language models, particularly conversational dialogue agents.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that attaching two labeled 'culturally grounded topics' and persona attributes to each dialogue is enough to make the conversations genuinely reflect and represent the cultures of the six countries.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Researchers can use SEADialogues to train or fine-tune dialogue agents in eight Southeast Asian languages, several of which are underserved by existing resources.
  • The persona and topic annotations enable experiments on personalized response generation, where models condition on user attributes and cultural context.
  • The dataset provides a multilingual benchmark for evaluating whether language models produce culturally appropriate responses in Southeast Asian settings.
  • Because the languages span six countries, the corpus allows cross-cultural comparisons of conversational norms within a single dataset.
  • Releasing the dataset is a step toward more human-centric conversational AI that reflects the diversity of the region's 700-plus million people.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not report experiments with dialogue systems, so the dataset's utility for improving cultural awareness remains an open empirical question.
  • A natural testable extension is to prompt multilingual language models with and without the persona and topic attributes, then measure whether responses judged culturally appropriate by native speakers improve when the attributes are present.
  • The choice of only two culturally grounded topics per dialogue may under-sample cultural diversity within each country; an audit of topic coverage against regional variation would clarify the dataset's limits.
  • The full text appended to this entry is a different paper (an evolutionary optimization study), so the pith above rests solely on the SEADialogues abstract; the mismatch should be resolved before treating the full text as evidence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript, as submitted, consists of an abstract describing SEADialogues, a proposed multilingual multi-turn dialogue dataset for eight Southeast Asian languages, followed by a full text that is an entirely different paper: 'Enhancing Decision Space Diversity in Multi-Objective Evolutionary Optimization for the Diet Problem' (arXiv:2508.07077v1). The full text contains no description of SEADialogues, no data collection methodology, no annotation protocol, no dataset statistics, no sample dialogues, and no validation of cultural grounding. The only in-scope evidence for the SEADialogues claim is the abstract itself, which asserts that the dataset has persona attributes and two culturally grounded topics per dialogue but gives no details on how these were selected, validated, or made representative across six countries and eight languages. Because the full text does not correspond to the abstract, the central contribution of the paper cannot be inspected or verified.

Significance. If SEADialogues exists as described, it would address a genuine gap: the scarcity of culturally grounded dialogue resources for Southeast Asian languages, many of which are low-resource. A carefully constructed, publicly released dataset of this kind would be valuable for research on culturally aware conversational AI. However, the submitted manuscript provides no evidence that the dataset exists, no documentation of its creation, and no supporting analysis. The value of the claimed contribution cannot be assessed from the submitted text. The paper therefore currently offers no verifiable scientific content beyond a brief, unsubstantiated abstract.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text, §1 onward] The full text is not the SEADialogues paper. The title, abstract, sections, equations, and references all concern multi-objective evolutionary optimization for the diet problem. No part of the body describes the dataset claimed in the paper's abstract. This is a load-bearing mismatch: the central claim cannot be checked, and the manuscript is internally inconsistent. A corrected replacement would be needed, not merely local revision.
  2. [Abstract] The central assertion that the dialogues are 'culturally grounded' is unsupported. The abstract states that each dialogue has 'two culturally grounded topics' and persona attributes but does not define what makes a topic culturally grounded, how topics or personas were selected, whether native speakers or community members were involved, or how representativeness across six countries and eight languages was ensured. Without a methodology section, this claim is unfalsifiable from the submitted material.
  3. [Abstract] The paper claims to release a multi-turn dialogue dataset, yet provides no dataset statistics, sample dialogues, annotation guidelines, inter-annotator agreement measures, or release URL. For a resource paper, these are essential. Their absence, combined with the full-text mismatch, prevents any meaningful evaluation of the dataset's quality, coverage, or utility.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Full text, references] The keywords, section headings, and reference list correspond to the diet-problem manuscript, not to SEADialogues. If this is a submission error, the authors should resubmit the correct file; the mismatch must be fixed before any further review.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract mentions 'eight languages from six Southeast Asian countries' but does not enumerate them. Listing the languages and countries would be helpful even in an abstract, especially for a resource paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the SEADialogues abstract asserts a new dataset with no derivational chain, and the supplied full text is a different paper, so there is no fitted-input or self-citation reduction to evaluate.

full rationale

The submitted abstract for SEADialogues makes an empirical/resource contribution: it introduces a multilingual, culturally grounded multi-turn dialogue dataset with persona attributes and culturally grounded topics. It contains no derivation, no fitted parameters, no equations, and no invoked uniqueness theorem. Consequently, there is no chain by which a claim could reduce to its own inputs. The only in-scope textual evidence beyond the abstract is a full text that belongs to a different manuscript, 'ENHANCING DECISION SPACE DIVERSITY IN MULTI-OBJECTIVE EVOLUTIONARY OPTIMIZATION FOR THE DIET PROBLEM' (arXiv:2508.07077v1). That mismatch means the SEADialogues methodology, annotation protocol, topic-selection procedure, and validation cannot be audited from the supplied material. This is a support/integrity gap, not circularity: no step in the SEADialogues argument is shown to be equivalent, by construction or by self-citation, to its own premises. The abstract's claim that topics are 'culturally grounded' is unverified, but unverified assertions are not circular reasoning. Therefore the honest finding is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the chosen topical and persona annotations successfully encode cultural grounding. No free parameters or invented entities are involved, as the contribution is a curated dataset.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Two culturally grounded topics per dialogue are sufficient to represent the cultural nuance of a community.
    The abstract claims cultural grounding through topics and personas, but offers no evidence that these two elements are sufficient or that the topics are truly representative of the diverse communities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SEADialogues: A Multilingual Culturally Grounded Multi-turn Dialogue Dataset on Southeast Asian Languages." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/N5VCEVFO

@misc{pith2026250807069,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SEADialogues: A Multilingual Culturally Grounded Multi-turn Dialogue Dataset on Southeast Asian Languages},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/N5VCEVFO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.07069}
}
read the original abstract

Although numerous datasets have been developed to support dialogue systems, most existing chit-chat datasets overlook the cultural nuances inherent in natural human conversations. To address this gap, we introduce SEADialogues, a culturally grounded dialogue dataset centered on Southeast Asia, a region with over 700 million people and immense cultural diversity. Our dataset features dialogues in eight languages from six Southeast Asian countries, many of which are low-resource despite having sizable speaker populations. To enhance cultural relevance and personalization, each dialogue includes persona attributes and two culturally grounded topics that reflect everyday life in the respective communities. Furthermore, we release a multi-turn dialogue dataset to advance research on culturally aware and human-centric large language models, including conversational dialogue agents.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CultureTalk-ID: A Multi-Task Dialogue Benchmark for Cultural Commonsense in Indonesian Local Languages

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CultureTalk-ID, a human-curated 4,496-dialogue benchmark in 11 Indonesian languages, shows open-source models lag in cultural dialogue reasoning and especially in generating local languages.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774

    arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Muhammad Adilazuarda, Sagnik Mukherjee, Pradhyumna Lavania, Siddhant Singh, Alham Aji, Jacki O’Neill, Ashutosh Modi, and Monojit Choudhury. 2024. Towards measuring and modeling “culture” in llms: A survey. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 15763--15784

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Alham Fikri Aji, Genta Indra Winata, Fajri Koto, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Ade Romadhony, Rahmad Mahendra, Kemal Kurniawan, David Moeljadi, Radityo Eko Prasojo, Timothy Baldwin, et al. 2022. One country, 700+ languages: Nlp challenges for underrepresented languages and dialects in indonesia. In 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistic...

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Dimo Angelov. 2020. Top2vec: Distributed representations of topics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.09470

    arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Miranda, Hanyang Zhao, Mohammad Rifqi Farhansyah, Garry Kuwanto, Derry Wijaya, and Genta Indra Winata

    David Anugraha, Zilu Tang, Lester James V. Miranda, Hanyang Zhao, Mohammad Rifqi Farhansyah, Garry Kuwanto, Derry Wijaya, and Genta Indra Winata. 2025. http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13388 R3: Robust rubric-agnostic reward models

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Pawe Budzianowski, Tsung-Hsien Wen, Bo-Hsiang Tseng, I \ n igo Casanueva, Stefan Ultes, Osman Ramadan, and Milica Gasic. 2018. Multiwoz-a large-scale multi-domain wizard-of-oz dataset for task-oriented dialogue modelling. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 5016--5026

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Amartya Chakraborty, Paresh Dashore, Nadia Bathaee, Anmol Jain, Anirban Das, Shi-Xiong Zhang, Sambit Sahu, Milind Naphade, and Genta Indra Winata. 2025. T1: A tool-oriented conversational dataset for multi-turn agentic planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.16986

    arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Yu Ying Chiu, Liwei Jiang, Bill Yuchen Lin, Chan Young Park, Shuyue Stella Li, Sahithya Ravi, Mehar Bhatia, Maria Antoniak, Yulia Tsvetkov, Vered Shwartz, et al. 2024. Culturalbench: A robust, diverse, and challenging cultural benchmark by human-ai culturalteaming. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02677

    arXiv 2024

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Leyang Cui, Yu Wu, Shujie Liu, Yue Zhang, and Ming Zhou. 2020. Mutual: A dataset for multi-turn dialogue reasoning. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1406--1416

    2020

  2. [10]

    Bosheng Ding, Junjie Hu, Lidong Bing, Mahani Aljunied, Shafiq Joty, Luo Si, and Chunyan Miao. 2022. Globalwoz: Globalizing multiwoz to develop multilingual task-oriented dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistic...

    2022

  3. [11]

    Ning Ding, Yulin Chen, Bokai Xu, Yujia Qin, Shengding Hu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, and Bowen Zhou. 2023. Enhancing chat language models by scaling high-quality instructional conversations. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processi...

    2023

  4. [12]

    Haodong Duan, Jueqi Wei, Chonghua Wang, Hongwei Liu, Yixiao Fang, Songyang Zhang, Dahua Lin, and Kai Chen. 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13650 Botchat: Evaluating llms' capabilities of having multi-turn dialogues . arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.13650

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Song Feng, Hui Wan, Chulaka Gunasekara, Siva Patel, Sachindra Joshi, and Luis Lastras. 2020. doc2dial: A goal-oriented document-grounded dialogue dataset. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 8118--8128

    2020

  6. [14]

    Rahul Goel, Waleed Ammar, Aditya Gupta, Siddharth Vashishtha, Motoki Sano, Faiz Surani, Max Chang, HyunJeong Choe, David Greene, Chuan He, et al. 2023. Presto: A multilingual dataset for parsing realistic task-oriented dialogs. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirica...

    2023

  7. [15]

    Aaron Grattafiori, Abhimanyu Dubey, Abhinav Jauhri, Abhinav Pandey, Abhishek Kadian, Ahmad Al-Dahle, Aiesha Letman, Akhil Mathur, Alan Schelten, Alex Vaughan, et al. 2024. The llama 3 herd of models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21783

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Yun He, Di Jin, Chaoqi Wang, Chloe Bi, Karishma Mandyam, Hejia Zhang, Chen Zhu, Ning Li, Tengyu Xu, Hongjiang Lv, Shruti Bhosale, Chenguang Zhu, Karthik Abinav Sankararaman, Eryk Helenowski, Melanie Kambadur, Aditya Tayade, Hao Ma, Han Fang, and Sinong Wang. 2024. https://arxi...

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Songbo Hu, Han Zhou, Mete Hergul, Milan Gritta, Guchun Zhang, Ignacio Iacobacci, Ivan Vuli \'c , and Anna Korhonen. 2023. Multi 3 woz: A multilingual, multi-domain, multi-parallel dataset for training and evaluating culturally adapted task-oriented dialog systems. Transactions...

    2023

  10. [18]

    Chia-Chien Hung, Anne Lauscher, Ivan Vuli \'c , Simone Paolo Ponzetto, and Goran Glava s . 2022. Multi2woz: A robust multilingual dataset and conversational pretraining for task-oriented dialog. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Associa...

    2022

  11. [19]

    Yonghyun Jun and Hwanhee Lee. 2025. Exploring persona sentiment sensitivity in personalized dialogue generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11423

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Muhammad Kautsar, Rahmah Nurdini, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Genta Indra Winata, and Ayu Purwarianti. 2023. Indotod: A multi-domain indonesian benchmark for end-to-end task-oriented dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the First Workshop in South East Asian Language Processing, pages 85--99

    2023

  13. [21]

    Yanran Li, Hui Su, Xiaoyu Shen, Wenjie Li, Ziqiang Cao, and Shuzi Niu. 2017. Dailydialog: A manually labelled multi-turn dialogue dataset. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 986--995

    2017

  14. [22]

    Yiwei Li, Fei Mi, Yitong Li, Yasheng Wang, Bin Sun, Shaoxiong Feng, and Kan Li. 2024. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.688 Dynamic stochastic decoding strategy for open-domain dialogue generation . In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL ...

    2024 doi

  15. [23]

    Zhaojiang Lin, Zihan Liu, Genta Indra Winata, Samuel Cahyawijaya, Andrea Madotto, Yejin Bang, Etsuko Ishii, and Pascale Fung. 2021. Xpersona: Evaluating multilingual personalized chatbot. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Conversational AI, ...

    2021

  16. [24]

    Yang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang, Ruochen Xu, and Chenguang Zhu. 2023 a . G-eval: Nlg evaluation using gpt-4 with better human alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.16634

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Zeming Liu, Ping Nie, Jie Cai, Haifeng Wang, Zheng-Yu Niu, Peng Zhang, Mrinmaya Sachan, and Kaiping Peng. 2023 b . Xdailydialog: A multilingual parallel dialogue corpus. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long ...

    2023

  18. [26]

    Lingbo Mo, Shun Jiang, Akash Maharaj, Bernard Hishamunda, and Yunyao Li. 2024. Hiertod: A task-oriented dialogue system driven by hierarchical goals. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07152

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Steven Moore, Richard Tong, Anjali Singh, Zitao Liu, Xiangen Hu, Yu Lu, Joleen Liang, Chen Cao, Hassan Khosravi, Paul Denny, et al. 2023. Empowering education with llms-the next-gen interface and content generation. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Edu...

    2023

  20. [28]

    Tuan-Phong Nguyen, Simon Razniewski, and Gerhard Weikum. 2024. Cultural commonsense knowledge for intercultural dialogues. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 1774--1784

    2024

  21. [29]

    Cheng Peng, Xi Yang, Aokun Chen, Kaleb E Smith, Nima PourNejatian, Anthony B Costa, Cheryl Martin, Mona G Flores, Ying Zhang, Tanja Magoc, et al. 2023. A study of generative large language model for medical research and healthcare. NPJ digital medicine, 6(1):210

    2023

  22. [30]

    José Pombal, Dongkeun Yoon, Patrick Fernandes, Ian Wu, Seungone Kim, Ricardo Rei, Graham Neubig, and André F. T. Martins. 2025. http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.04953 M-prometheus: A suite of open multilingual llm judges

    2025

  23. [31]

    Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2383--2392

    2016

  24. [32]

    Ramon Robloke and Boonserm Kijsirikul. 2019. A task-oriented dialogue bot using long short-term memory with attention for thai language. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Advanced Information Science and System, pages 1--6

    2019

  25. [33]

    Mayank Soni, Brendan Spillane, Leo Muckley, Orla Cooney, Emer Gilmartin, Christian Saam, Benjamin Cowan, and Vincent Wade. 2022. An empirical study of topic transition in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Discourse, pages 92--99

    2022

  26. [34]

    Kai Sun, Seungwhan Moon, Paul A Crook, Stephen Roller, Becka Silvert, Bing Liu, Zhiguang Wang, Honglei Liu, Eunjoon Cho, and Claire Cardie. 2021. Adding chit-chat to enhance task-oriented dialogues. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Ass...

    2021

  27. [35]

    Sathya Krishnan Suresh, Wu Mengjun, Tushar Pranav, and EngSiong Chng. 2025. Diasynth: Synthetic dialogue generation framework for low resource dialogue applications. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2025, pages 673--690

    2025

  28. [36]

    Gemini Team, Petko Georgiev, Ving Ian Lei, Ryan Burnell, Libin Bai, Anmol Gulati, Garrett Tanzer, Damien Vincent, Zhufeng Pan, Shibo Wang, et al. 2024. Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of context. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.05530

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Phi Nguyen Van, Tung Cao Hoang, Dung Nguyen Manh, Quan Nguyen Minh, and Long Tran Quoc. 2022. Viwoz: A multi-domain task-oriented dialogue systems dataset for low-resource language. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.07742

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Guanghui Ye, Huan Zhao, Zixing Zhang, Xupeng Zha, and Zhihua Jiang. 2024. Lstdial: Enhancing dialogue generation via long-and short-term measurement feedback. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ...

    2024

  31. [39]

    Saizheng Zhang, Emily Dinan, Jack Urbanek, Arthur Szlam, Douwe Kiela, and Jason Weston. 2018. Personalizing dialogue agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too? In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), ...

    2018

  32. [40]

    Yinhe Zheng, Guanyi Chen, Minlie Huang, Song Liu, and Xuan Zhu. 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.09672 Personalized dialogue generation with diversified traits . arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.09672

    2019 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Qi Zhu, Kaili Huang, Zheng Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhu, and Minlie Huang. 2020. Crosswoz: A large-scale chinese cross-domain task-oriented dialogue dataset. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8:281--295

    2020

  34. [42]

    URL: " 'urlintro :=

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year eprint doi pubmed url lastchecked label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before...

  35. [43]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.