A Guide to Bayesian Optimization in Bioprocess Engineering

Antonio del Rio Chanona; Emma Pajak; Eric von Lieres; Katrin Rosenthal; Laura Marie Helleckes; Maximilian Siska

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 127 references

A Guide to Bayesian Optimization in Bioprocess Engineering

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that Bayesian optimization, adapted to biological noise, can guide bioprocess experiments more efficiently than traditional one-factor-at-a-time design.

desk verdict A well-scoped review/tutorial whose real value depends on content I could not read; the abstract and framing are sound but unverifiable from the garbled text. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10642 v1 pith:C6DMD4GR submitted 2025-08-14 q-bio.OT stat.ML

Maximilian Siska , Emma Pajak , Katrin Rosenthal , Antonio del Rio Chanona , Eric von Lieres , Laura Marie Helleckes This is my paper · ORCID

classification q-bio.OTstat.ML

keywords BayesianoptimizationbioprocessengineeringGaussianprocesssurrogateacquisitionfunctionexperimentaldesignbiologicalnoisesequentialexperimentationreview

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review sets out to make Bayesian optimization usable for bioprocess engineers. It argues that the method's appeal—working with noisy data, small datasets, and sequential adaptive suggestions—maps directly onto bioprocess experimentation, but only if the standard algorithm is extended to handle biological variability such as drift, batch effects, and constraints. The paper's stated aim is twofold: give an intuitive, practical introduction to the machinery, and chart promising applications and open algorithmic challenges. If the review is right, practitioners can plan experiments that converge to good process conditions with less lab effort.

What carries the argument

The Bayesian optimization loop: a surrogate model (typically a Gaussian process) is fit to all measured conditions, giving a predicted value and an uncertainty estimate everywhere; an acquisition function then scores candidate next experiments by balancing the predicted gain against the uncertainty in that prediction. The acquisition function is the component that carries the argument, because it is what converts the model's uncertainty into a concrete experimental recommendation, and it is where the review says biological noise must be handled.

What would settle it

A head-to-head campaign on a real bioprocess optimization—same organism, same media library, same budget, comparing the review's Bayesian optimization workflow against one-factor-at-a-time and factorial design—would settle it: if the Bayesian optimization-guided runs are not more sample-efficient under realistic biological variability, the review's central promise collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that classical Bayesian optimization—a probabilistic model of the objective plus an acquisition function that chooses the next experiment—transfers to bioprocess engineering when extended for biological uncertainty. The paper presents this as a synthesis rather than a new theorem: the noise tolerance and sample efficiency that make Bayesian optimization popular in other experimental sciences are precisely the properties needed for cultivation, media, and feed optimization, and the extensions required by biological systems are the main open design choices. If the review is right, the field can move from intuition-driven one-factor-at-a-time experimentation to a closed loo

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the Bayesian optimization machinery described in the review is mature enough that, once augmented for biological noise, it will perform on real bioprocess experiments as it does on the benchmark problems that established it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Bioprocess development can be organized as a closed loop in which each experiment is chosen from the current probabilistic model, so prior measurements are reused rather than discarded.
Noisy biological measurements become a reason to choose noise-aware surrogates and acquisition rules, not a reason to abandon optimization.
Practitioners without a statistics background can adopt Bayesian optimization through the tutorial framing, lowering the barrier to entry the review identifies.
The open challenges the paper lists—batch recommendations, multi-fidelity data, and constraints—define a concrete agenda for machine-learning research in bioprocesses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the review's recommendations are followed on a typical strain- or media-optimization campaign, a reasonable test is whether Bayesian optimization reaches the same titer with materially fewer experiments than one-factor-at-a-time; the paper argues for this implicitly but does not run the comparison.
The same extensions are portable to adjacent fields—cell-line development, scale-up, or personalized bioprocess control—where experiments are expensive and noise is heterogeneous, so the guide's categories could seed transferable benchmarks.
Because the paper treats accessibility as a central problem, a concrete next step would be a reproducibility check: a practitioner using only the guide should be able to recreate a published Bayesian optimization result; the paper leaves that test open.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is a review/tutorial, not a new result. Its value depends entirely on whether the exposition is accurate and usable for bioprocess practitioners. From the abstract, it's a well-scoped and sensible project; from the garbled full text, I can't tell if it succeeds.

What it does well: the paper identifies a real mismatch between classical BO assumptions and biological experimentation—noise, constraint structure, cost—and aims to bridge it for an audience that isn't fluent in Gaussian processes. That's a genuine service. The two-part structure (accessible intro plus open challenges) is a good way to serve both newcomers and researchers. The motivation, that biological uncertainty requires extensions, is consistent with the broader BO literature and not a stretch.

The main soft spot is that I cannot audit the content. The supplied full text is corrupted, so the tutorial equations, worked examples, and literature claims are unseen. That's a limitation of my review, not necessarily of the paper. Still, for a review, accuracy of the math and citations is everything. I would want to check whether the tutorial actually walks through a realistic end-to-end example or just lists equations. Also, the novelty is modest—it's a presentation choice, not a new method. The claim that BO in bioprocess engineering is 'in its infancy' is plausible but has been made for a few years now, so the survey should be current.

On the citation pattern: I can't assess it from what I have. No red flags in the abstract.

Recommendation: send this to peer review with a bioprocess engineering expert and an applied ML expert. A serious referee can verify the pedagogical claims and the literature coverage. If the paper ships code or a worked dataset, that would materially raise its value. It's not a desk reject; the topic is useful and the goals are achievable.

Who it's for: practitioners in bioprocess or other experimental sciences who want a gentler entry into BO, and ML researchers looking for problem statements with biological constraints.

I'd bring it to a reading group only if the full text becomes available. I'd cite it if I worked in bioprocess engineering and it turned out to be accurate.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper is a review and tutorial titled 'A Guide to Bayesian Optimization in Bioprocess Engineering.' It argues that Bayesian optimization (BO) is attractive for bioprocess experimentation because it handles noisy data, works with small datasets, and provides adaptive sequential suggestions. The authors further claim that biological experimentation introduces uncertainty and constraints that require extensions beyond classical BO, and that the existing BO literature is too statistical for many practitioners. The paper's stated aims are (1) to give an intuitive, practical introduction to BO and (2) to survey promising application areas and open algorithmic challenges. The abstract is readable and internally consistent. However, the supplied full text is severely corrupted (mojibake/encoding artifacts); equations are partially legible and most prose is unreadable, so the substantive tutorial content cannot be audited.

Significance. If the review is accurate and well structured, it could be a useful service to the bioprocess engineering community by lowering the barrier to using BO. The claim that biological noise and constraints require extensions of classical BO is plausible and consistent with the broader BO and design-of-experiments literature. However, the paper presents no new mathematical derivation, dataset, or code, so its significance rests entirely on the correctness and clarity of the survey and tutorial. These cannot be verified from the corrupted full text. The abstract-level claim is not questionable, but the pedagogical value—the core contribution—remains unaudited.

major comments (2)

[Full text (all sections)] The supplied full text is garbled mojibake; section headings, most sentences, and many displayed equations are unreadable. I cannot verify the tutorial equations, the worked examples, the description of BO variants, or the accuracy of the literature survey. Because the paper's central contribution is pedagogical reliability, this is a load-bearing verification gap. The abstract is plausible, but a review/tutorial of this kind can only be judged on the correctness of its exposition, and that exposition is not accessible.
[Abstract / full text] The abstract promises 'specific extensions to classical Bayesian optimization' for biological uncertainty. From the corrupted text I cannot locate where these extensions are systematically defined, compared with existing BO extensions, or illustrated. The claim is reasonable and consistent with the literature, but the promised treatment cannot be checked. The authors should ensure that the manuscript clearly identifies and discusses these extensions in a structured way.

minor comments (2)

[Full text] The full text appears to have an encoding problem. If this is a PDF-extraction artifact, the authors should provide a clean copy, because the current version is not usable for review or for readers.
[General] Because the full text is corrupted, I cannot assess figure quality, table contents, or the completeness of the reference list. These should be checked once a readable version is available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity identified: the paper is an expository review/tutorial, and the supplied full text is garbled, leaving no derivational chain or fitted-input prediction to audit.

full rationale

The abstract describes a review with two aims: an intuitive introduction to Bayesian optimization and an outline of application areas and open challenges in bioprocess engineering. It makes no quantitative prediction, fits no parameter from data, and presents no derivation that could reduce to its own inputs. The claims it does make — that Bayesian optimization handles noise, works with small data, and needs extensions for biological uncertainty — are standard properties of the method, not results derived within the paper. The supplied full text is largely mojibake/corrupted, so specific equations, example walkthroughs, and cited results cannot be extracted or checked. Under the instructions, absence of an extractable derivation chain means no circular step can be exhibited. A review's reliance on the correctness of the existing Bayesian optimization literature is a normal structural assumption of a tutorial, not circular reasoning. No self-citation load-bearing argument, uniqueness import, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results is visible or quotable from the readable abstract. Therefore the appropriate verdict is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract introduces no free parameters, no new entities, and only relies on standard domain assumptions about Bayesian optimization and bioprocess experiments. Without the full text, no further assumptions can be extracted.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Guide to Bayesian Optimization in Bioprocess Engineering." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C6DMD4GR

@misc{pith2026250810642,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Guide to Bayesian Optimization in Bioprocess Engineering},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C6DMD4GR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10642}
}

read the original abstract

Bayesian optimization has become widely popular across various experimental sciences due to its favorable attributes: it can handle noisy data, perform well with relatively small datasets, and provide adaptive suggestions for sequential experimentation. While still in its infancy, Bayesian optimization has recently gained traction in bioprocess engineering. However, experimentation with biological systems is highly complex and the resulting experimental uncertainty requires specific extensions to classical Bayesian optimization. Moreover, current literature often targets readers with a strong statistical background, limiting its accessibility for practitioners. In light of these developments, this review has two aims: first, to provide an intuitive and practical introduction to Bayesian optimization; and second, to outline promising application areas and open algorithmic challenges, thereby highlighting opportunities for future research in machine learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

[1]

Adams, and Nando de Freitas

Bobak Shahriari, Kevin Swersky, Ziyu Wang, Ryan P. Adams, and Nando de Freitas . Taking the Human Out of the Loop : A Review of Bayesian Optimization . Proceedings of the IEEE , 104(1):148--175, January 2016

2016
[2]

A versatile stochastic model of a function of unknown and time varying form

Harold J Kushner. A versatile stochastic model of a function of unknown and time varying form. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 5(1):150--167, August 1962

1962
[3]

H. J. Kushner. A New Method of Locating the Maximum Point of an Arbitrary Multipeak Curve in the Presence of Noise . Journal of Basic Engineering , 86(1):97--106, March 1964

1964
[4]

Danie G. Krige. A Statistical Approach to Some Mine Valuation and Allied Problems on the Witwatersrand . PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 1951

1951
[5]

Principles of geostatistics

Georges Matheron. Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology , 58(8):1246--1266, December 1963

1963
[6]

S altenis

V.R. S altenis. On a method of multi-extremal optimization. Automatics and Computers (Avtomat \'a ka \'a Vychisl \'a telnayya Tekchnika) , 3:33--38, 1971

1971
[7]

Mo c kus

J. Mo c kus. On bayesian methods for seeking the extremum. In G. Goos, J. Hartmanis, P. Brinch Hansen, D. Gries, C. Moler, G. Seegm \"u ller, N. Wirth, and G. I. Marchuk, editors, Optimization Techniques IFIP Technical Conference Novosibirsk , July 1--7, 1974 , volume 27, pages 400--404. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1975

1974
[8]

Bayesian Approach to Global Optimization : Theory and Applications , volume 37 of Mathematics and Its Applications

Jonas Mo c kus. Bayesian Approach to Global Optimization : Theory and Applications , volume 37 of Mathematics and Its Applications . Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1989

1989

Show all 127 references

[9]

Jones, Matthias Schonlau, and William J

Donald R. Jones, Matthias Schonlau, and William J. Welch. Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions . Journal of Global Optimization , 13(4):455--492, December 1998

1998
[10]

Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms

Jasper Snoek, Hugo Larochelle, and Ryan P Adams. Practical Bayesian Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 25, pages 2951--2959. Curran Associates, Inc., 2012

2012
[11]

Frazier and Jialei Wang

Peter I. Frazier and Jialei Wang. Bayesian Optimization for Materials Design . In Turab Lookman, Francis J. Alexander, and Krishna Rajan, editors, Information Science for Materials Discovery and Design , volume 225, pages 45--75. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016

2016
[12]

Bayesian optimisation for Intelligent Environmental Monitoring

Roman Marchant and Fabio Ramos. Bayesian optimisation for Intelligent Environmental Monitoring . In 2012 IEEE / RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , pages 2242--2249, October 2012

2012
[13]

Negoescu, Peter I

Diana M. Negoescu, Peter I. Frazier, and Warren B. Powell. The Knowledge-Gradient Algorithm for Sequencing Experiments in Drug Discovery . INFORMS Journal on Computing , 23(3):346--363, August 2011

2011
[14]

Simon, and Janardhan Rao Doppa

Aryan Deshwal, Cory M. Simon, and Janardhan Rao Doppa. Bayesian optimization of nanoporous materials. Molecular Systems Design & Engineering , 6(12):1066--1086, November 2021

2021
[15]

Eisner, Corinne Carpenter, Weike Sun, Gregory C

Sanket Diwale, Maximilian K. Eisner, Corinne Carpenter, Weike Sun, Gregory C. Rutledge, and Richard D. Braatz. Bayesian optimization for material discovery processes with noise. Molecular Systems Design & Engineering , 7(6):622--636, June 2022

2022
[16]

Yimeng Jin and Priyank V. Kumar. Bayesian optimisation for efficient material discovery: A mini review. Nanoscale , 15(26):10975--10984, 2023

2023
[17]

Shields, Jason Stevens, Jun Li, Marvin Parasram, Farhan Damani, Jesus I

Benjamin J. Shields, Jason Stevens, Jun Li, Marvin Parasram, Farhan Damani, Jesus I. Martinez Alvarado, Jacob M. Janey, Ryan P. Adams, and Abigail G. Doyle. Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis. Nature , 590(7844):89--96, February 2021

2021
[18]

Taylor, Kobi C

Connor J. Taylor, Kobi C. Felton, Daniel Wigh, Mohammed I. Jeraal, Rachel Grainger, Gianni Chessari, Christopher N. Johnson, and Alexei A. Lapkin. Accelerated Chemical Reaction Optimization Using Multi-Task Learning . ACS Central Science , 9(5):957--968, May 2023

2023
[19]

Multi-objective Bayesian optimization of chemical reactor design using computational fluid dynamics

Seongeon Park, Jonggeol Na, Minjun Kim, and Jong Min Lee. Multi-objective Bayesian optimization of chemical reactor design using computational fluid dynamics. Computers & Chemical Engineering , 119:25--37, November 2018

2018
[20]

Matar, and Ehecatl Antonio del Rio Chanona

Tom Savage, Nausheen Basha, Jonathan McDonough, Omar K. Matar, and Ehecatl Antonio del Rio Chanona . Multi-fidelity data-driven design and analysis of reactor and tube simulations. Computers & Chemical Engineering , 179:108410, November 2023

2023
[21]

Ruberg, Francois Beckers, Rob Hemmings, Peter Honig, Telba Irony, Lisa LaVange, Grazyna Lieberman, James Mayne, and Richard Moscicki

Stephen J. Ruberg, Francois Beckers, Rob Hemmings, Peter Honig, Telba Irony, Lisa LaVange, Grazyna Lieberman, James Mayne, and Richard Moscicki. Application of Bayesian approaches in drug development: Starting a virtuous cycle. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery , 22(3):235--250, M...

2023
[22]

Protein engineering via Bayesian optimization-guided evolutionary algorithm and robotic experiments

Ruyun Hu, Lihao Fu, Yongcan Chen, Junyu Chen, Yu Qiao, and Tong Si. Protein engineering via Bayesian optimization-guided evolutionary algorithm and robotic experiments. Briefings in Bioinformatics , 24(1):bbac570, January 2023

2023
[23]

High-throughput screening of catalytically active inclusion bodies using laboratory automation and Bayesian optimization

Laura Marie Helleckes, Kira K \"u sters, Christian Wagner, Rebecca Hamel, Ronja Saborowski, Jan Marienhagen, Wolfgang Wiechert, and Marco Oldiges. High-throughput screening of catalytically active inclusion bodies using laboratory automation and Bayesian optimization. Microbia...

2024
[24]

Framework for Kriging -based iterative experimental analysis and design: Optimization of secretory protein production in Corynebacterium glutamicum

Lars Freier, Johannes Hemmerich, Katja Sch \"o ler, Wolfgang Wiechert, Marco Oldiges, and Eric Von Lieres. Framework for Kriging -based iterative experimental analysis and design: Optimization of secretory protein production in Corynebacterium glutamicum . Engineering in Life ...

2016
[25]

Amir Pandi, Christoph Diehl, Ali Yazdizadeh Kharrazi, Scott A. Scholz, Elizaveta Bobkova, L \'e on Faure, Maren Nattermann, David Adam, Nils Chapin, Yeganeh Foroughijabbari, Charles Moritz, Nicole Paczia, Ni \ n a Socorro Cortina, Jean-Loup Faulon, and Tobias J. Erb. A versati...

2022
[26]

High throughput optimization of medium composition for Escherichia coli protein expression using deep learning and Bayesian optimization

Kanako Yoshida, Kazuki Watanabe, Tai-Ying Chiou, and Masaaki Konishi. High throughput optimization of medium composition for Escherichia coli protein expression using deep learning and Bayesian optimization. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering , 135(2):127--133, February 2023

2023
[27]

Hinckley, Rachel Barry, Brendan Dang, Lenna A

Harini Narayanan, Joshua A. Hinckley, Rachel Barry, Brendan Dang, Lenna A. Wolffe, Adel Atari, Yuen-Yi Tseng, and J. Christopher Love. Accelerating cell culture media development using Bayesian optimization-based iterative experimental design. Nature Communications , 16(1):605...

2025
[28]

Avoiding Replicates in Biocatalysis Experiments : Machine Learning for Enzyme Cascade Optimization

Regine Siedentop, Maximilian Siska, Johanna Hermes, Stephan L \"u tz, Eric von Lieres , and Katrin Rosenthal. Avoiding Replicates in Biocatalysis Experiments : Machine Learning for Enzyme Cascade Optimization . ChemCatChem , 17(1):e202400777, 2025

2025
[29]

Sara Sousa Rosa, Davide Nunes, Luis Antunes, Duarte M. F. Prazeres, Marco P. C. Marques, and Ana M. Azevedo. Maximizing mRNA vaccine production with Bayesian optimization. Biotechnology and Bioengineering , 119(11):3127--3139, 2022

2022
[30]

Designing Robust Biotechnological Processes Regarding Variabilities Using Multi-Objective Optimization Applied to a Biopharmaceutical Seed Train Design

Tanja Hern \'a ndez Rodr \'i guez, Anton Sekulic, Markus Lange-Hegermann , and Bj \"o rn Frahm. Designing Robust Biotechnological Processes Regarding Variabilities Using Multi-Objective Optimization Applied to a Biopharmaceutical Seed Train Design . Processes , 10(5):883, April 2022

2022
[31]

Bayesian optimization using multiple directional objective functions allows the rapid inverse fitting of parameters for chromatography simulations

Ronald Colin J \"a pel and Johannes Felix Buyel. Bayesian optimization using multiple directional objective functions allows the rapid inverse fitting of parameters for chromatography simulations. Journal of Chromatography A , 1679:463408, August 2022

2022
[32]

Multi-objective global optimization ( MOGO ): Algorithm and case study in gradient elution chromatography

Lars Freier and Eric Von Lieres. Multi-objective global optimization ( MOGO ): Algorithm and case study in gradient elution chromatography. Biotechnology Journal , 12(7):1600613, July 2017

2017
[33]

Design of Biopharmaceutical Formulations Accelerated by Machine Learning

Harini Narayanan, Fabian Dingfelder, Itzel Condado Morales, Bhargav Patel, Kristine Enem rke Heding, Jais Rose Bjelke, Thomas Egebjerg, Alessandro Butt \'e , Michael Sokolov, Nikolai Lorenzen, and Paolo Arosio. Design of Biopharmaceutical Formulations Accelerated by Machine Le...

2021
[34]

Bayesian Optimization in Bioprocess Engineering --- Where Do We Stand Today ? Biotechnology and Bioengineering , 122(6):1313--1325, June 2025

Florian Gisperg, Robert Klausser, Mohamed Elshazly, Julian Kopp, Eva P r \'a da Brichtov \'a , and Oliver Spadiut. Bayesian Optimization in Bioprocess Engineering --- Where Do We Stand Today ? Biotechnology and Bioengineering , 122(6):1313--1325, June 2025

2025
[35]

An Intuitive Tutorial to Gaussian Process Regression

Jie Wang. An Intuitive Tutorial to Gaussian Process Regression . Computing in Science & Engineering , 25(4):4--11, July 2023

2023
[36]

A Visual Exploration of Gaussian Processes

Jochen G \"o rtler, Rebecca Kehlbeck, and Oliver Deussen. A Visual Exploration of Gaussian Processes . Distill , 4(4), April 2019

2019
[37]

Carl Edward Rasmussen and Christopher K. I. Williams. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning . Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 2006

2006
[38]

Bayesian Optimization

Roman Garnett. Bayesian Optimization . Cambridge University Press, 1 edition, January 2023

2023
[39]

Exploring Bayesian Optimization

Apoorv Agnihotri and Nipun Batra. Exploring Bayesian Optimization . Distill , 5(5), May 2020

2020
[40]

BoTorch : A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian Optimization

Maximilian Balandat, Brian Karrer, Daniel Jiang, Samuel Daulton, Ben Letham, Andrew G Wilson, and Eytan Bakshy. BoTorch : A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian Optimization . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 33, pages 21524--21538. Curran ...

2020
[41]

D \"u rholt, Thomas S

Johannes P. D \"u rholt, Thomas S. Asche, Johanna Kleinekorte, Gabriel Mancino-Ball , Benjamin Schiller, Simon Sung, Julian Keupp, Aaron Osburg, Toby Boyne, Ruth Misener, Rosona Eldred, Wagner Steuer Costa, Chrysoula Kappatou, Robert M. Lee, Dominik Linzner, David Walz, Niklas...

2024
[42]

Hopp, Marcel M \"u ller, Rim Rihana, Karin Hrovatin, Fabian Liebig, Mathias Winkel, Wolfgang Halter, and Jan Gerit Brandenburg

Martin Fitzner, Adrian S o s i \'c , Alexander V. Hopp, Marcel M \"u ller, Rim Rihana, Karin Hrovatin, Fabian Liebig, Mathias Winkel, Wolfgang Halter, and Jan Gerit Brandenburg. BayBE : A Bayesian Back End for experimental planning in the low-to-no-data regime. Digital Discove...

2025
[43]

Gardner, Geoff Pleiss, David Bindel, Kilian Q

Jacob R. Gardner, Geoff Pleiss, David Bindel, Kilian Q. Weinberger, and Andrew Gordon Wilson. GPyTorch : Blackbox Matrix-Matrix Gaussian Process Inference with GPU Acceleration , 2018

2018
[44]

Scikit-optimize/scikit-optimize

Tim Head, Manoj Kumar, Holger Nahrstaedt, Gilles Louppe, and Iaroslav Shcherbatyi. Scikit-optimize/scikit-optimize. Zenodo, October 2021

2021
[45]

Bayesian Optimization for Adaptive Experimental Design : A Review

Stewart Greenhill, Santu Rana, Sunil Gupta, Pratibha Vellanki, and Svetha Venkatesh. Bayesian Optimization for Adaptive Experimental Design : A Review . IEEE Access , 8:13937--13948, 2020

2020
[46]

Frazier, Keith Baar, and David E

Zachary Cosenza, Raul Astudillo, Peter I. Frazier, Keith Baar, and David E. Block. Multi-information source Bayesian optimization of culture media for cellular agriculture. Biotechnology and Bioengineering , 119(9):2447--2458, September 2022

2022
[47]

A survey on high-dimensional Gaussian process modeling with application to Bayesian optimization, 2021

Mickael Binois and Nathan Wycoff. A survey on high-dimensional Gaussian process modeling with application to Bayesian optimization, 2021

2021
[48]

Gary Wang

Songqing Shan and G. Gary Wang. Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization , 41(2):219--241, March 2010

2010
[49]

Matthias Schonlau and William J. Welch. Screening the Input Variables to a Computer Model Via Analysis of Variance and Visualization . In Angela Dean and Susan Lewis, editors, Screening , pages 308--327. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2006

2006
[50]

Vanilla Bayesian Optimization Performs Great in High Dimensions

Carl Hvarfner, Erik Orm Hellsten, and Luigi Nardi. Vanilla Bayesian Optimization Performs Great in High Dimensions . In Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning , Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 20793--20817. PMLR, 2024

2024
[51]

Scalable Global Optimization via Local Bayesian Optimization

David Eriksson, Michael Pearce, Jacob R Gardner, Ryan Turner, and Matthias Poloczek. Scalable Global Optimization via Local Bayesian Optimization . arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.01739 , 2019

1910 arXiv
[52]

Deterministic Global Optimization of the Acquisition Function in Bayesian Optimization : To Do or Not To Do ? arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03625 , March 2025

Anastasia Georgiou, Daniel Jungen, Luise Kaven, Verena Hunstig, Constantine Frangakis, Ioannis Kevrekidis, and Alexander Mitsos. Deterministic Global Optimization of the Acquisition Function in Bayesian Optimization : To Do or Not To Do ? arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03625 , March 2025

2025
[53]

Cruz Bournazou, Alessandro Butte, and Moritz Von Stosch

Riccardo De Luca, Goncalo Costa, Harini Narayanan, Claus Wirnsperger, Mariano N. Cruz Bournazou, Alessandro Butte, and Moritz Von Stosch. Comparison of strategies for iterative model-based upstream bioprocess development with single and parallel reactor set-ups. Biochemical En...

2023
[54]

Structured sampling strategies in Bayesian optimization: Evaluation in mathematical and real-world scenarios

Lucas Greif, Niklas H \"u bschle, Andreas Kimmig, Simon Kreuzwieser, Anatole Martenne, and Jivka Ovtcharova. Structured sampling strategies in Bayesian optimization: Evaluation in mathematical and real-world scenarios. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing , March 2025

2025
[55]

Human-algorithm collaborative Bayesian optimization for engineering systems

Tom Savage and Ehecatl Antonio Del Rio Chanona. Human-algorithm collaborative Bayesian optimization for engineering systems. Computers & Chemical Engineering , 189:108810, October 2024

2024
[56]

A framework for accelerated phototrophic bioprocess development: Integration of parallelized microscale cultivation, laboratory automation and Kriging-assisted experimental design

Holger Morschett, Lars Freier, Jannis Rohde, Wolfgang Wiechert, Eric Von Lieres, and Marco Oldiges. A framework for accelerated phototrophic bioprocess development: Integration of parallelized microscale cultivation, laboratory automation and Kriging-assisted experimental desi...

2017
[57]

Batch Bayesian Optimization for Replicable Experimental Design , 2023

Zhongxiang Dai, Quoc Phong Nguyen, Sebastian Shenghong Tay, Daisuke Urano, Richalynn Leong, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low, and Patrick Jaillet. Batch Bayesian Optimization for Replicable Experimental Design , 2023

2023
[58]

Schweiger, Michael Bahn, Phil Ineson, Mirco Migliavacca, Thibaut Morel-Journel, Jesper Riis Christiansen, Nicolas Schtickzelle, and Klaus Steenberg Larsen

Juergen Kreyling, Andreas H. Schweiger, Michael Bahn, Phil Ineson, Mirco Migliavacca, Thibaut Morel-Journel, Jesper Riis Christiansen, Nicolas Schtickzelle, and Klaus Steenberg Larsen. To replicate, or not to replicate -- that is the question: How to tackle nonlinear responses...

2018
[59]

Control of parallelized bioreactors II : Probabilistic quantification of carboxylic acid reductase activity for bioprocess optimization

Nikolas von den Eichen , Michael Osthege, Michaela D \"o lle, Lukas Bromig, Wolfgang Wiechert, Marco Oldiges, and Dirk Weuster-Botz . Control of parallelized bioreactors II : Probabilistic quantification of carboxylic acid reductase activity for bioprocess optimization. Biopro...

1939
[60]

Lapierre, Pasquale Mattaliano, Dennis Raith, Mariela Castillo-Cota, Jonas Bermeitinger, and Robert Huber

Fr \'e d \'e ric M. Lapierre, Pasquale Mattaliano, Dennis Raith, Mariela Castillo-Cota, Jonas Bermeitinger, and Robert Huber. Multi-cycle high-throughput growth media optimization using batch Bayesian optimization. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology , page jctb.786...

2025
[61]

Doyle, Berno J.E

Lukas Ortmann, Dawei Shi, Eyal Dassau, Francis J. Doyle, Berno J.E. Misgeld, and Steffen Leonhardt. Automated Insulin Delivery for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients using Gaussian Process-based Model Predictive Control . In 2019 American Control Conference ( ACC ) , pages 4118...

2019
[62]

Lhelleckes/ BO \_ Empirical \_ Examples : v0.1.0, August 2025

Maximilian Siska, Laura Helleckes, and Emma Pajak. Lhelleckes/ BO \_ Empirical \_ Examples : v0.1.0, August 2025

2025
[63]

Gongora, Zekun Ren, Armi Tiihonen, Zhe Liu, Shijing Sun, James R

Qiaohao Liang, Aldair E. Gongora, Zekun Ren, Armi Tiihonen, Zhe Liu, Shijing Sun, James R. Deneault, Daniil Bash, Flore Mekki-Berrada , Saif A. Khan, Kedar Hippalgaonkar, Benji Maruyama, Keith A. Brown, John Fisher III, and Tonio Buonassisi. Benchmarking the performance of Bay...

2021
[64]

Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimization , 2023

Sebastian Ament, Samuel Daulton, David Eriksson, Maximilian Balandat, and Eytan Bakshy. Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimization , 2023

2023
[65]

Amala Mary Vincent and P. Jidesh. An improved hyperparameter optimization framework for AutoML systems using evolutionary algorithms. Scientific Reports , 13(1), March 2023

2023
[66]

Hoffman, and Zoubin Ghahramani

Jos \'e Miguel Hern \'a ndez-Lobato , Matthew W. Hoffman, and Zoubin Ghahramani. Predictive Entropy Search for Efficient Global Optimization of Black-box Functions , 2014

2014
[67]

Random features for large-scale kernel machines

Ali Rahimi and Benjamin Recht. Random features for large-scale kernel machines. Advances in neural information processing systems , 20:1177--1184, 2007

2007
[68]

Spatial mapping with Gaussian processes and nonstationary Fourier features

Jean-Francois Ton, Seth Flaxman, Dino Sejdinovic, and Samir Bhatt. Spatial mapping with Gaussian processes and nonstationary Fourier features. Spatial Statistics , 28:59--78, December 2018

2018
[69]

Large- Scale Learning with Fourier Features and Tensor Decompositions , 2021

Frederiek Wesel and Kim Batselier. Large- Scale Learning with Fourier Features and Tensor Decompositions , 2021

2021
[70]

Leek, Robert B

Jeffrey T. Leek, Robert B. Scharpf, H \'e ctor Corrada Bravo, David Simcha, Benjamin Langmead, W. Evan Johnson, Donald Geman, Keith Baggerly, and Rafael A. Irizarry. Tackling the widespread and critical impact of batch effects in high-throughput data. Nature Reviews Genetics ,...

2010
[71]

Why Batch Effects Matter in Omics Data , and How to Avoid Them

Wilson Wen Bin Goh, Wei Wang, and Limsoon Wong. Why Batch Effects Matter in Omics Data , and How to Avoid Them . Trends in Biotechnology , 35(6):498--507, June 2017

2017
[72]

Evaluating and minimizing batch effects in metabolomics

Wei Han and Liang Li. Evaluating and minimizing batch effects in metabolomics. Mass Spectrometry Reviews , 41(3):421--442, 2022

2022
[73]

Detecting and removing multiplicative spatial bias in high-throughput screening technologies

Iurie Caraus, Bogdan Mazoure, Robert Nadon, and Vladimir Makarenkov. Detecting and removing multiplicative spatial bias in high-throughput screening technologies. Bioinformatics , 33(20):3258--3267, October 2017

2017
[74]

Burt, Timothy J

Susannah M. Burt, Timothy J. N. Carter, and Larry J. Kricka. Thermal characteristics of microtitre plates used in immunological assays. Journal of Immunological Methods , 31(3):231--236, December 1979

1979
[75]

Ray, Laura Brunner, Jin Wang, Jean W

Kinnari Pandya, Chad A. Ray, Laura Brunner, Jin Wang, Jean W. Lee, and Binodh DeSilva. Strategies to minimize variability and bias associated with manual pipetting in ligand binding assays to assure data quality of protein therapeutic quantification. Journal of Pharmaceutical ...

2010
[76]

Variability in the adsorption properties of microtitre plates used as solid supports in enzyme immunoassay

L J Kricka, T J Carter, S M Burt, J H Kennedy, R L Holder, M I Halliday, M E Telford, and G B Wisdom. Variability in the adsorption properties of microtitre plates used as solid supports in enzyme immunoassay. Clinical Chemistry , 26(6):741--744, May 1980

1980
[77]

Location Dependent Biases in Automatic 96- Well Microplate Readers

Robert O Harrison and Bruce D Hammock. Location Dependent Biases in Automatic 96- Well Microplate Readers . Journal of Association of Official Analytical Chemists , 71(5):981--987, September 1988

1988
[78]

Montgomery

Douglas C. Montgomery. Design and Analysis of Experiments . Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, tenth edition edition, 2020

2020
[79]

Mitigation of microtiter plate positioning effects using a block randomization scheme

Christopher Roselle, Thorsten Verch, and Mary Shank-Retzlaff . Mitigation of microtiter plate positioning effects using a block randomization scheme. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry , 408(15):3969--3979, June 2016

2016
[80]

Helleckes, Carolin M \"u ller, Tim Griesbach, Vera Waffenschmidt, Matthias Moch, Michael Osthege, Wolfgang Wiechert, and Marco Oldiges

Laura M. Helleckes, Carolin M \"u ller, Tim Griesbach, Vera Waffenschmidt, Matthias Moch, Michael Osthege, Wolfgang Wiechert, and Marco Oldiges. Explore or exploit? A model-based screening strategy for PETase secretion by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnology and Bioengine...

2023
[81]

Bayesian calibration, process modeling and uncertainty quantification in biotechnology

Laura Marie Helleckes, Michael Osthege, Wolfgang Wiechert, Eric von Lieres, and Marco Oldiges. Bayesian calibration, process modeling and uncertainty quantification in biotechnology. PLOS Computational Biology , 18(3):e1009223, March 2022

2022
[82]

Thompson, Victor M

Jaron C. Thompson, Victor M. Zavala, and Ophelia S. Venturelli. Integrating a tailored recurrent neural network with Bayesian experimental design to optimize microbial community functions. PLOS Computational Biology , 19(9):e1011436, September 2023

2023
[83]

Bayesian cell therapy process optimization

Evan Claes, Tommy Heck, Kathleen Coddens, Maarten Sonnaert, Jan Schrooten, and Jan Verwaeren. Bayesian cell therapy process optimization. Biotechnology and Bioengineering , 121(5):1569--1582, May 2024

2024
[84]

Block, Keith Baar, and Xingyu Chen

Zachary Cosenza, David E. Block, Keith Baar, and Xingyu Chen. Multi-objective Bayesian algorithm automatically discovers low-cost high-growth serum-free media for cellular agriculture application. Engineering in Life Sciences , 23(8):e2300005, August 2023

2023
[85]

Robotic search for optimal cell culture in regenerative medicine

Genki N Kanda, Taku Tsuzuki, Motoki Terada, Noriko Sakai, Naohiro Motozawa, Tomohiro Masuda, Mitsuhiro Nishida, Chihaya T Watanabe, Tatsuki Higashi, Shuhei A Horiguchi, Taku Kudo, Motohisa Kamei, Genshiro A Sunagawa, Kenji Matsukuma, Takeshi Sakurada, Yosuke Ozawa, Masayo Taka...

2022
[86]

Gonz \'a lez and Victor M

Leonardo D. Gonz \'a lez and Victor M. Zavala. New paradigms for exploiting parallel experiments in Bayesian optimization. Computers & Chemical Engineering , 170:108110, February 2023

2023
[87]

Batch Bayesian Optimization via Local Penalization

Javier Gonzalez, Zhenwen Dai, Philipp Hennig, and Neil Lawrence. Batch Bayesian Optimization via Local Penalization . In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 648--657. PMLR, May 2016

2016
[88]

Parallelised Bayesian Optimisation via Thompson Sampling

Kirthevasan Kandasamy, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Jeff Schneider, and Barnabas Poczos. Parallelised Bayesian Optimisation via Thompson Sampling . In Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 133--142. PMLR, March 2018

2018
[89]

Diversified Sampling for Batched Bayesian Optimization with Determinantal Point Processes , February 2022

Elvis Nava, Mojm \'i r Mutn \'y , and Andreas Krause. Diversified Sampling for Batched Bayesian Optimization with Determinantal Point Processes , February 2022

2022
[90]

Wilson, Frank Hutter, and Marc Peter Deisenroth

James T. Wilson, Frank Hutter, and Marc Peter Deisenroth. Maximizing acquisition functions for Bayesian optimization, 2018

2018
[91]

Machine learning-assisted discovery of flow reactor designs

Tom Savage, Nausheen Basha, Jonathan McDonough, James Krassowski, Omar Matar, and Ehecatl Antonio Del Rio Chanona. Machine learning-assisted discovery of flow reactor designs. Nature Chemical Engineering , 1(8):522--531, August 2024

2024
[92]

Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling

Alexander I.J Forrester, Andr \'a s S \'o bester, and Andy J Keane. Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 463(2088):3251--3269, December 2007
[93]

Lee, Behrang Shafei, David Walz, Calvin Tsay, Mark Van Der Wilk, and Ruth Misener

Jose Pablo Folch, Robert M. Lee, Behrang Shafei, David Walz, Calvin Tsay, Mark Van Der Wilk, and Ruth Misener. Combining multi-fidelity modelling and asynchronous batch Bayesian Optimization . Computers & Chemical Engineering , 172:108194, April 2023

2023
[94]

Moss, David S

Henry B. Moss, David S. Leslie, Javier Gonzalez, and Paul Rayson. GIBBON : General-purpose Information-Based Bayesian Optimisation . Journal of Machine Learning Research , 22(235):1--49, 2021

2021
[95]

Osborne, and Eytan Bakshy

Samuel Daulton, Xingchen Wan, David Eriksson, Maximilian Balandat, Michael A. Osborne, and Eytan Bakshy. Bayesian Optimization over Discrete and Mixed Spaces via Probabilistic Reparameterization , October 2022

2022
[96]

Garrido-Merch \'a n and Daniel Hern \'a ndez-Lobato

Eduardo C. Garrido-Merch \'a n and Daniel Hern \'a ndez-Lobato . Dealing with Categorical and Integer-valued Variables in Bayesian Optimization with Gaussian Processes . Neurocomputing , 380:20--35, March 2020

2020
[97]

Alvi, Vu Nguyen, Michael A

Binxin Ru, Ahsan S. Alvi, Vu Nguyen, Michael A. Osborne, and Stephen J. Roberts. Bayesian Optimisation over Multiple Continuous and Categorical Inputs , August 2020

2020
[98]

Multi-task Gaussian Process Prediction

Edwin V Bonilla, Kian Chai, and Christopher Williams. Multi-task Gaussian Process Prediction . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 20, pages 153--160. Curran Associates, Inc., 2007

2007
[99]

Andrew Gordon Wilson, Zhiting Hu, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and Eric P. Xing. Deep Kernel Learning . In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics , pages 370--378. PMLR, May 2016

2016
[100]

Wei, David Duvenaud, Jos \'e Miguel Hern \'a ndez-Lobato , Benjam \'i n S \'a nchez-Lengeling , Dennis Sheberla, Jorge Aguilera-Iparraguirre , Timothy D

Rafael G \'o mez-Bombarelli , Jennifer N. Wei, David Duvenaud, Jos \'e Miguel Hern \'a ndez-Lobato , Benjam \'i n S \'a nchez-Lengeling , Dennis Sheberla, Jorge Aguilera-Iparraguirre , Timothy D. Hirzel, Ryan P. Adams, and Al \'a n Aspuru-Guzik . Automatic Chemical Design Usin...

2018
[101]

Romero, Andreas Krause, and Frances H

Philip A. Romero, Andreas Krause, and Frances H. Arnold. Navigating the protein fitness landscape with Gaussian processes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 110(3), January 2013

2013
[102]

BOSS : Bayesian Optimization over String Spaces

Henry Moss, David Leslie, Daniel Beck, Javier Gonz \'a lez, and Paul Rayson. BOSS : Bayesian Optimization over String Spaces . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 33, pages 15476--15486. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020

2020
[103]

Constrained Bayesian optimization for automatic chemical design using variational autoencoders

Ryan-Rhys Griffiths and Jos \'e Miguel Hern \'a ndez-Lobato . Constrained Bayesian optimization for automatic chemical design using variational autoencoders. Chemical Science , 11(2):577--586, 2020

2020
[104]

John Jumper, Richard Evans, Alexander Pritzel, Tim Green, Michael Figurnov, Olaf Ronneberger, Kathryn Tunyasuvunakool, Russ Bates, Augustin Z \'i dek, Anna Potapenko, Alex Bridgland, Clemens Meyer, Simon A. A. Kohl, Andrew J. Ballard, Andrew Cowie, Bernardino Romera-Paredes , ...

2021
[105]

Convolutional Networks on Graphs for Learning Molecular Fingerprints

David K Duvenaud, Dougal Maclaurin, Jorge Iparraguirre, Rafael Bombarell, Timothy Hirzel, Alan Aspuru-Guzik , and Ryan P Adams. Convolutional Networks on Graphs for Learning Molecular Fingerprints . In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 28, pages 2224--...

2015
[106]

Exploring Optimal Reaction Conditions Guided by Graph Neural Networks and Bayesian Optimization

Youngchun Kwon, Dongseon Lee, Jin Woo Kim, Youn-Suk Choi, and Sun Kim. Exploring Optimal Reaction Conditions Guided by Graph Neural Networks and Bayesian Optimization . ACS Omega , 7(49):44939--44950, December 2022

2022
[107]

Cruz Bournazou, and Alessandro Butt \'e

Clemens Hutter, Moritz Von Stosch, Mariano N. Cruz Bournazou, and Alessandro Butt \'e . Knowledge transfer across cell lines using hybrid Gaussian process models with entity embedding vectors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering , 118(11):4389--4401, 2021

2021
[108]

Helleckes, Claus Wirnsperger, Jakub Polak, Gonzalo Guill \'e n-Gos \'a lbez , Alessandro Butt \'e , and Moritz Von Stosch

Laura M. Helleckes, Claus Wirnsperger, Jakub Polak, Gonzalo Guill \'e n-Gos \'a lbez , Alessandro Butt \'e , and Moritz Von Stosch. Novel calibration design improves knowledge transfer across products for the characterization of pharmaceutical bioprocesses. Biotechnology Journ...

2024
[109]

Lawrence

Javier Gonzalez, Zhenwen Dai, Andreas Damianou, and Neil D. Lawrence. Preferential Bayesian Optimization , 2017

2017
[110]

Coutinho, Ivan Castillo, and Marco S

Jo \ a o P.L. Coutinho, Ivan Castillo, and Marco S. Reis. Human-in-the-loop controller tuning using Preferential Bayesian Optimization . IFAC-PapersOnLine , 58(14):13--18, 2024

2024
[111]

Kalinin, Maxim A

Arpan Biswas, Yongtao Liu, Nicole Creange, Yu-Chen Liu, Stephen Jesse, Jan-Chi Yang, Sergei V. Kalinin, Maxim A. Ziatdinov, and Rama K. Vasudevan. A dynamic Bayesian optimized active recommender system for curiosity-driven partially Human-in-the-loop automated experiments. npj...

2024
[112]

TR-BEACON : Shedding Light on Efficient Behavior Discovery in High-Dimensional Spaces with Bayesian Novelty Search over Trust Regions

Wei-Ting Tang, Ankush Chakrabarty, and Joel Paulson. TR-BEACON : Shedding Light on Efficient Behavior Discovery in High-Dimensional Spaces with Bayesian Novelty Search over Trust Regions . In NeurIPS 2024 Workshop on Bayesian Decision-making and Uncertainty , October 2024

2024
[113]

Predictive Entropy Search for Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization

Daniel Hernandez-Lobato , Jose Hernandez-Lobato , Amar Shah, and Ryan Adams. Predictive Entropy Search for Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization . In Proceedings of The 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 1492--1501. PMLR, June 2016

2016
[114]

Safe Real-Time Optimization using Multi-Fidelity Gaussian Processes

Panagiotis Petsagkourakis, Benoit Chachuat, and Ehecatl Antonio Del Rio-Chanona . Safe Real-Time Optimization using Multi-Fidelity Gaussian Processes . In 2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control ( CDC ) , pages 6734--6741, Austin, TX, USA, December 2021. IEEE

2021
[115]

Paulson, Georgios Makrygiorgos, and Ali Mesbah

Joel A. Paulson, Georgios Makrygiorgos, and Ali Mesbah. Adversarially robust Bayesian optimization for efficient auto-tuning of generic control structures under uncertainty. AIChE Journal , 68(6):e17591, June 2022

2022
[116]

Tipton, Richard N

Keith F. Tipton, Richard N. Armstrong, Barbara M. Bakker, Amos Bairoch, Athel Cornish-Bowden , Peter J. Halling, Jan-Hendrik Hofmeyr, Thomas S. Leyh, Carsten Kettner, Frank M. Raushel, Johann Rohwer, Dietmar Schomburg, and Christoph Steinbeck. Standards for Reporting Enzyme Da...

2014
[117]

u rgen Pleiss, Carsten Kettner, and D \

Stephan Malzacher, Dominik Mei ner, Jan Range, Zvjezdana Findrik Bla z evi \'c , Katrin Rosenthal, John M. Woodley, Roland Wohlgemuth, Peter Wied, Bernd Nidetzky, Robert T. Giessmann, Kridsadakorn Prakinee, Pimchai Chaiyen, Andreas S. Bommarius, Johann M. Rohwer, Rodrigo O. M....

2024
[118]

Improving Reproducibility in Synthetic Biology

Mathew M Jessop-Fabre and Nikolaus Sonnenschein. Improving Reproducibility in Synthetic Biology . Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology , 7:18, February 2019

2019
[119]

o ring, D \

Simone Lauterbach, Hannah Dienhart, Jan Range, Stephan Malzacher, Jan-Dirk Sp \"o ring, D \"o rte Rother, Maria Filipa Pinto, Pedro Martins, Colton E. Lagerman, Andreas S. Bommarius, Amalie Vang H st, John M. Woodley, Sandile Ngubane, Tukayi Kudanga, Frank T. Bergmann, Johann ...

2023
[120]

Hucka, A

M. Hucka, A. Finney, H. M. Sauro, H. Bolouri, J. C. Doyle, H. Kitano, A. P. Arkin, B. J. Bornstein, D. Bray, A. Cornish-Bowden , A. A. Cuellar, S. Dronov, E. D. Gilles, M. Ginkel, V. Gor, I. I. Goryanin, W. J. Hedley, T. C. Hodgman, J.-H. Hofmeyr, P. J. Hunter, N. S. Juty, J. ...

2003
[121]

o nig, Fengkai Zhang, Andreas Dr \

Sarah M Keating, Dagmar Waltemath, Matthias K \"o nig, Fengkai Zhang, Andreas Dr \"a ger, Claudine Chaouiya, Frank T Bergmann, Andrew Finney, Colin S Gillespie, Tom \'a s Helikar, Stefan Hoops, Rahuman S Malik-Sheriff, Stuart L Moodie, Ion I Moraru, Chris J Myers, Aur \'e lien...

2020
[122]

Mione, Martin F

Federico M. Mione, Martin F. Luna, Lucas Kaspersetz, Peter Neubauer, Ernesto C. Martinez, and M. Nicolas Cruz Bournazou. A property graph schema for automated metadata capture, reproducibility and knowledge discovery in high-throughput bioprocess development. Digital Discovery , 2025

2025
[123]

Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan-Willem Boiten, Luiz Bonino Da Silva Santos, Philip E

Mark D. Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier, IJsbrand Jan Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, Myles Axton, Arie Baak, Niklas Blomberg, Jan-Willem Boiten, Luiz Bonino Da Silva Santos, Philip E. Bourne, Jildau Bouwman, Anthony J. Brookes, Tim Clark, Merc \`e Crosas, Ingrid Dillo, Olivier D...

2016
[124]

Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research

Geir Kjetil Sandve, Anton Nekrutenko, James Taylor, and Eivind Hovig. Ten Simple Rules for Reproducible Computational Research . PLoS Computational Biology , 9(10):e1003285, October 2013

2013
[125]

The importance of research data management: The value of electronic laboratory notebooks in the management of data integrity and data availability

Matt Dunie. The importance of research data management: The value of electronic laboratory notebooks in the management of data integrity and data availability. Information Services & Use , 37(3):355--359, November 2017

2017
[126]

Procedures for systematic capture and management of analytical data in academia

Jan Potthoff, Pierre Tremouilhac, Patrick Hodapp, Bernhard Neumair, Stefan Br \"a se, and Nicole Jung. Procedures for systematic capture and management of analytical data in academia. Analytica Chimica Acta: X , 1:100007, March 2019

2019
[127]

Fonnesbeck, Maxim Kochurov, Ravin Kumar, Junpeng Lao, Christian C

Oriol Abril-Pla , Virgile Andreani, Colin Carroll, Larry Dong, Christopher J. Fonnesbeck, Maxim Kochurov, Ravin Kumar, Junpeng Lao, Christian C. Luhmann, Osvaldo A. Martin, Michael Osthege, Ricardo Vieira, Thomas Wiecki, and Robert Zinkov. PyMC : A modern, and comprehensive pr...

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Adams, and Nando de Freitas

Bobak Shahriari, Kevin Swersky, Ziyu Wang, Ryan P. Adams, and Nando de Freitas . Taking the Human Out of the Loop : A Review of Bayesian Optimization . Proceedings of the IEEE , 104(1):148--175, January 2016

2016

[2] [2]

A versatile stochastic model of a function of unknown and time varying form

Harold J Kushner. A versatile stochastic model of a function of unknown and time varying form. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications , 5(1):150--167, August 1962

1962

[3] [3]

H. J. Kushner. A New Method of Locating the Maximum Point of an Arbitrary Multipeak Curve in the Presence of Noise . Journal of Basic Engineering , 86(1):97--106, March 1964

1964

[4] [4]

Danie G. Krige. A Statistical Approach to Some Mine Valuation and Allied Problems on the Witwatersrand . PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, 1951

1951

[5] [5]

Principles of geostatistics

Georges Matheron. Principles of geostatistics. Economic Geology , 58(8):1246--1266, December 1963

1963

[6] [6]

S altenis

V.R. S altenis. On a method of multi-extremal optimization. Automatics and Computers (Avtomat \'a ka \'a Vychisl \'a telnayya Tekchnika) , 3:33--38, 1971

1971

[7] [7]

Mo c kus

J. Mo c kus. On bayesian methods for seeking the extremum. In G. Goos, J. Hartmanis, P. Brinch Hansen, D. Gries, C. Moler, G. Seegm \"u ller, N. Wirth, and G. I. Marchuk, editors, Optimization Techniques IFIP Technical Conference Novosibirsk , July 1--7, 1974 , volume 27, pages 400--404. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1975

1974

[8] [8]

Bayesian Approach to Global Optimization : Theory and Applications , volume 37 of Mathematics and Its Applications

Jonas Mo c kus. Bayesian Approach to Global Optimization : Theory and Applications , volume 37 of Mathematics and Its Applications . Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1989

1989