pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2508.12672 · v4 · submitted 2025-08-18 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI

Recognition: unknown

Robust Federated Learning under Adversarial Attacks via Loss-Based Client Clustering

Authors on Pith no claims yet
classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AI
keywords serverattacksclientclientstrustedunderacrossadversarial
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across multiple clients without sharing private data. We consider FL scenarios wherein FL clients are subject to adversarial (Byzantine) attacks, while the FL server is trusted (honest) and has a trustworthy side dataset. This may correspond to, e.g., cases where the server possesses trusted data prior to federation, or to the presence of a trusted client that temporarily assumes the server role. Our approach requires only two honest participants, i.e., the server and one client, to function effectively, without prior knowledge of the number of malicious clients. Theoretical analysis demonstrates bounded optimality gaps even under strong Byzantine attacks. Experimental results show that our algorithm significantly outperforms standard and robust FL baselines such as Mean, Trimmed Mean, Median, Krum, and Multi-Krum under various attack strategies including label flipping, sign flipping, and Gaussian noise addition across MNIST, FMNIST, and CIFAR-10 benchmarks using the Flower framework.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Comparative Study of Federated Learning Aggregation Strategies under Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Data Distributions

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Federated aggregation strategies show distinct performance trade-offs in accuracy, loss, and efficiency depending on whether client data distributions are homogeneous or heterogeneous.