Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Massive extended streamers feed high-mass young stars

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper reports ALMA observations of massive protostar G336 ALMA1 showing that infalling streamers reach from ~2000 au down to ~60 au, bypassing a large disk, and deliver enough momentum to overcome the star's radiation pressure.

desk verdict Very good data, but the two-orders-of-magnitude force-balance claim relies on a free-fall model that the paper's own kinematics contradict. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.15889 v1 pith:7UTTTQBX submitted 2025-08-21 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Fernando A. Olguin , Patricio Sanhueza , Adam Ginsburg , Huei-Ru Vivien Chen , Kei E. I. Tanaka , Xing Lu , Kaho Morii , Fumitaka Nakamura
show 8 more authors
Shanghuo Li Yu Cheng Qizhou Zhang Qiuyi Luo Yoko Oya Takeshi Sakai Masao Saito Andrés E. Guzmán
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords high-massstarformationaccretionstreamerscircumstellardisksradiationfeedbackALMAobservationsG336ALMA1protostellar
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that massive stars can be fed by streamers rather than by a large accretion disk. Using ALMA observations at about 86 au resolution, the authors trace an elongated gas inflow (a streamer) around the massive protostar G336 ALMA1 continuously from about 2000 au down to about 60 au. They find no conventional rotating disk at the radius where a disk would be expected, and the gas keeps its stream-like shape even inside that radius. The streamers carry roughly 0.3-0.6 solar masses each and fall inward at about 10^-3 solar masses per year, an order of magnitude higher than streamers feeding low-mass stars. The paper argues this inward flow exerts enough force to overwhelm the protostar's radiation pressure, so streamers can supply the gas needed to build massive stars even when a disk is absent or very small.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a rotating-and-infalling streamline model: analytic trajectories of gas parcels moving under a central mass while conserving angular momentum. The paper extends the outer streamer model into the region inside the centrifugal radius by placing a new streamline origin at 500 au with a nearly zero initial radial velocity and an initial polar angle close to the mid-plane; the final radius is set by r_f = r_0^4 Omega^2 / (G M_c). Alongside this, the observed line-of-sight velocities are compared with four distributions—Keplerian rotation, Keplerian plus free-fall, an infalling-rotating-envelope model, and the pure streamline model—which lets the authors distinguish rotati

What would settle it

Two observations would settle it: image the central ~60 au at sub-30 au resolution to see whether a compact Keplerian disk has formed, and re-fit the inner blue streamer's position-velocity diagram with the inclination left free to test whether the inward-continuation model is genuinely preferred over an inclined disk. A direct negative test is multi-epoch proper-motion imaging: if the inner gas is moving about 17 km/s toward the star, its position should shift measurably over a few years; if the pattern of motion is orbital or outflow-like, the streamer-fed claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the high-mass protostar G336 ALMA1 is being fed by massive extended streamers that penetrate well inside the expected disk radius, connecting the envelope to a small unresolved central region or directly to the protostar without a large Keplerian disk. High-resolution 1.3 mm continuum and hot methanol observations show a continuous blue-shifted inflow from about 2000 au down to about 60 au; inside about 500 au the velocity profile is consistent with Keplerian rotation, but the morphology is a streamer, not a flattened disk. The measured masses of the two inner streamers (0.3-0.6 solar masses) and their infall rates (about 10^-3 solar masses per year) are an order of

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that streamers, not a disk, feed G336 ALMA1 assumes that the blue-shifted gas seen from 500 au down to ~60 au is the inward continuation of the same infall stream, lying in a plane inclined 65 degrees to our line of sight; if that gas is instead a small inclined disk, an outflow-cavity wall, or a projection of unrelated gas, the infall rates and the force balance do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 10 solar-mass protostar can keep growing through its own feedback region: the blue streamer's momentum exceeds the radiation force by two orders of magnitude down to about 60 au.
  • Absence of a detectable Keplerian disk no longer implies stalled growth; an unresolved central source can still be fed at about 10^-3 solar masses per year by streamers.
  • Streamers can deliver an order of magnitude more mass per unit time than typical low-mass streamers, suggesting the same anisotropic-infall phenomenon scales across star-forming regimes.
  • Shocked SO emission near the centrifugal barrier offers a signpost for where infalling streamers join the mid-plane, which could help identify similar systems.
  • The combined inner streamers can replenish the gas around ALMA1 on timescales of roughly 10^2 to 10^4 years, comparable to or faster than viscous disk accretion timescales.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this pattern generalizes, searches for massive-star accretion should map molecular-line velocity fields at sub-100 au scales rather than only look for flattened continuum disks.
  • The same anisotropic-infall geometry, if common, may imprint the angular momentum and chemical history of any inner disk and therefore influence the planet-forming reservoir around massive stars.
  • The two-order-of-magnitude force margin assumes spherical absorption of the stellar radiation; a dedicated radiative-transfer calculation for the actual streamer geometry is the natural next test and could narrow or widen the gap.
  • Multi-epoch ALMA proper motions of the inner streamer would provide a direct independent test: gas moving about 17 km/s toward the star should shift position measurably over a few years, confirming or disproving continuous inward motion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents new ALMA high-resolution (86 au) 1.3 mm observations of the high-mass star-forming core G336 ALMA1. The authors report that the previously detected blue-shifted streamer continues inward from the centrifugal radius (~500 au) to ~60 au, where no conventional Keplerian disk is seen in continuum. They model the streamer with rotating/infalling streamlines and compare position-velocity diagrams to Keplerian, IRE, and free-fall profiles. From continuum fluxes they estimate inner streamer masses of 0.3–0.6 Msun and, assuming free-fall, infall rates ~10^-3 Msun/yr. They further claim the blue-shifted streamer exerts a force two orders of magnitude larger than radiation pressure, allowing it to quench feedback and feed the young high-mass star directly. The title and abstract frame streamers as a substitute for a large disk in the accretion chain.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, this would be an important demonstration that high-mass protostars can be fed by massive, small-scale streamers without a large Keplerian disk, and that such streamers can overcome radiation pressure. The observational data are of high quality, the paper is transparent about the analysis, and the public release of maps and codes (Zenodo 10.5281/zenodo.15354559 and 10.5281/zenodo.15362023) is exemplary. The morphological detection of a streamer extending to the central unresolved source is already a valuable observational result. However, the central quantitative claim—that the inflow force exceeds radiation pressure by two orders of magnitude—rests on a free-fall assumption that is in direct tension with the paper's own kinematic fits, which favor Keplerian rotation in the inner streamer. This inconsistency weakens the headline conclusion and requires revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Materials and Methods, Replenishing times] The claim that the blue-shifted streamer exerts a force two orders of magnitude above L/c uses a free-fall velocity v=17 km/s at r=61 au (Eq. 3) and Mdot=1.6e-3 Msun/yr from Eq. 11. However, Fig. 2 and the text identify Keplerian rotation and IRE as the best-fitting velocity distributions for the inner blue streamer, with velocities 'likely dominated by a rotational component as expected for a disk-like structure.' A gas parcel cannot simultaneously be on a near-Keplerian orbit and be free-falling radially. The authors themselves note in 'Inner blue streamer modeling' that the angular velocity needed to match the observed velocity implies, via Eq. 1, a much larger final radius than the adopted 200 au. Therefore the free-fall force balance is not established by the data. If the inner streamer is rotation-dominated, the viscous infall rates (10^-6 to 10^-5 Msun/yr) yield forces at or below
  2. [Inner blue streamer modeling] The inner streamline model parameters are selected by visual inspection ('we determine the models that best match the shape of the streamer by visual inspection'), with no quantitative goodness-of-fit or uncertainty quantification. The resulting geometry—a second infalling system in the mid-plane with r0=R_c and rf=200 au—is an ad hoc assumption. Given the observed Keplerian-like velocity profile in Fig. 2, an inclined disk, an outflow cavity wall, or projection of unrelated gas could produce similar morphology and kinematics. A quantitative fit to the PV diagram or moment map (e.g., a chi-square or residual map) is needed to support the claim that the inner blue streamer is the inward continuation of the outer streamer rather than a disk-like structure.
  3. [Eq. (11)] The infall rate Mdot = v_ff M_d / l uses a free-fall velocity of 6 km/s at R_c=500 au and a streamer length l=500 au. Since the inner streamer's kinematics are best reproduced by Keplerian rotation, the radial infall component is likely much smaller than the free-fall value. Equation (11) therefore gives a strict upper limit only under an assumption that the kinematic data contradict. The sentence 'Given that the infall is likely neither free-falling nor viscous, the real values should be in between our estimates' is not a substitute for a model-consistent estimate; the free-fall rate is not a valid bound for a rotation-dominated flow. This affects both the replenishing times and the force comparison.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 2] The two abscissa scales (distance along streamer path and deprojected radial distance) are not clearly tied to the plotted curves. Please clarify which scale applies to the models and how the deprojection using i=65 deg was applied.
  2. [Replenishing times] The sentence 'The region files used for the calculation of the inner streamer masses are publicly available online' is repeated verbatim twice. Please delete the duplicate.
  3. [Eq. (9)] The free-fall time uses rho = M/(4/3 pi R_c^3) with M = 10 Msun and R_c = 61 au. This is a density of the central mass spread over the central source, not the density of the streamer or the accreting gas. Please clarify the physical meaning of this quantity, as the resulting t_ff ~25 yr is used as a timescale for gas replenishment in ALMA1.
  4. [Table 1] The inner blue streamer row lists theta0 = 89 deg; the text explains this is because the model is undefined at 90 deg. It would be helpful to note in the table that theta0 = 89 deg is a proxy for the mid-plane (theta0 = 90 deg).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central mass/inclination are external inputs from prior published modeling, and the infall/force estimates are model-based order-of-magnitude calculations, not predictions forced by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative claims are the inner-streamer infall rate and the force comparison with radiation pressure. These are not defined in terms of the quantities they purport to establish. The central mass (10 Msun) and inclination (65 deg) are taken from ref. 28, a prior peer-reviewed modeling paper with overlapping authors; this is a legitimate external input, not a conclusion derived within this paper from its own fitted values. The centrifugal radius is updated to 500 au by visual model matching, and this value is used to delineate the inner streamer and to estimate infall rates; however, the infall rates themselves are computed from measured continuum masses plus an adopted free-fall or viscous prescription (Eqs. 8, 11), not from the shape fit. The force-balance estimate (Mdot * v_in ~ 1e24 N vs L/c ~ 1e22 N) uses Eq. 3 free-fall velocities as an upper-limit assumption; it is not a prediction of the fitted Keplerian/IRE models, and the paper explicitly acknowledges a mismatch between the streamline shape model and the velocity data in the 'Inner blue streamer modeling' section. That mismatch is a physical-consistency concern and a correctness risk, but it is not a circular reduction: no equation is defined in terms of the quantity it is supposed to predict, and no fitted parameter is renamed as an independent prediction. The self-citations do not invoke a uniqueness theorem or forbid alternative interpretations, so they do not create circularity under the stated rules.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on several fitted or assumed quantities: the central mass and inclination come from the authors' prior IRE modeling, the centrifugal radius and streamer angles are tuned by visual inspection, and the infall rate and force balance use a free-fall upper limit. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (9)
  • Centrifugal radius R_c = 500 au (range 450-550 au)
    Updated from 400 au in ref 28; chosen by visual inspection of streamline fit to streamer morphology (Materials and Methods, Model refinement). Used to define inner/outer streamer and to set the radius for mass and infall-rate estimates.
  • Streamline model angles for outer blue streamer = theta0 = 80 deg, phi0 = 55 deg
    Chosen within ranges (theta0 75-85, phi0 50-70) to best match streamer morphology by eye; angles in velocity_tools standard (Table 1).
  • Inner blue streamer model parameters = r0 = R_c, rf = 200 au, theta0 = 89 deg, phi0 = 145 deg, v_r0 = 0.1 km/s
    Parameters varied over table ranges; phi0=145 matches the end of outer streamer; v_r0=0.1 chosen because 0 does not converge at 89 deg; 'we could not find a model that matches' for rf=60 au (Materials and Methods).
  • Inclination angle i = 65 deg
    Taken from ref 28 and used for all deprojections and line-of-sight velocity projections (Projection of the velocities).
  • Central mass M_c = 10 Msun
    Taken from IRE modeling in prior paper (28); used in Keplerian, free-fall, IRE velocity distributions, free-fall times, and force estimates.
  • Dust temperature T = 100 K
    Single temperature for central source and streamers in mass estimate (Eq. 8); roughly the brightness temperature, but no uncertainty propagated.
  • Dust opacity kappa_nu = 1 cm2/g
    Standard assumption at 1.3 mm from Ossenkopf & Henning (1994); used in mass estimate without uncertainty.
  • Free-fall velocity v_ff = 6 km/s
    Constant free-fall velocity at r=500 au for M_c=10 Msun; used in Mdot = v M_d / l, giving the 'fastest possible' infall rate (Replenishing times).
  • Viscosity parameter alpha = 0.1 to 1
    Range from literature for marginally unstable protostellar disks; used for the lower-bound viscous accretion time (Eq. 10).
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Newtonian gravitational dynamics, Keplerian rotation, and free-fall equations
    Velocity distributions in Eqs. 2-5 and streamline model from Mendoza et al. (2009) assume standard Newtonian gravity.
  • domain assumption The CH3OH emission from the blue streamer traces infalling gas, not outflow contamination
    The red-shifted streamer is excluded 'because of contamination from the outflow', implying the blue streamer is assumed uncontaminated (Results and Discussion, Rotating and infalling motions).
  • domain assumption Dust emission is optically thin with dust-to-gas ratio 0.01
    Mass estimate uses Eq. 8 with R_dg = 0.01 and kappa = 1 cm2/g; authors note the optically thin approximation for the central source gives an upper limit.
  • domain assumption The clump luminosity (2.5e4 Lsun) is dominated by ALMA1, and radiation force is L/c assuming spherical symmetry and full absorption
    Force comparison in Materials and Methods, Replenishing times, follows ref 53; if the luminosity is not dominated by ALMA1 or radiation escapes through polar cavities, the force balance changes.
  • domain assumption The streamer gas lies in the mid-plane, inclined 65 degrees to the line of sight
    All deprojected distances and line-of-sight velocity projections use this geometry (Projection of the velocities).
  • ad hoc to paper The inner blue streamer can be modeled as a second infalling system in the mid-plane with r0 = R_c and rf = 200 au
    Introduced to connect the outer streamer to the inner emission; initial polar angle set to 89 deg because the Mendoza et al. model is undefined at 90 deg (Inner blue streamer modeling).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Massive extended streamers feed high-mass young stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7UTTTQBX

@misc{pith2026250815889,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Massive extended streamers feed high-mass young stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7UTTTQBX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.15889}
}
read the original abstract

Stars are born in a variety of environments that determine how they gather gas to achieve their final masses. It is generally believed that disks are ubiquitous around protostars as a result of angular momentum conservation and are natural places to grow planets. As such, they are proposed to be the last link in the inflow chain from the molecular cloud to the star. However, disks are not the only form that inflows can take. Here we report on high-resolution observations performed with the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array that reveal inflows in the form of streamers. These streamers persist well within the expected disk radius, indicating that they play a substitute role channeling material from the envelope directly to an unresolved small disk or even directly to the forming high-mass protostar. These flows are massive enough to feed the central unresolved region at a rate sufficient to quench the feedback effects of the young massive star.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Electroweak symmetry non-restoration and suppressed dark radiation in Supersymmetric Twin Higgs model

    hep-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a supersymmetric Twin Higgs model, light scalars can keep electroweak symmetry broken at high temperature, and a special neutrino sector can suppress dark radiation to match CMB limits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The unexpectedly large proportion of high-mass star-forming cores in a Galactic mini-starburst,

    F. Motte, T. Nony, F. Louvet, K. A. Marsh, S. Bontemps, A. P. Whitworth, A. Men’shchikov, Q. Nguyen Luong, T. Csengeri, A. J. Maury, A. Gusdorf, E. Chapillon, V. K¨onyves, P. Schilke, A. Duarte-Cabral, P. Didelon, and M. Gaudel, “The unexpectedly large proportion of high-mass star-forming cores in a Galactic mini-starburst,” Nature Astronomy, vol. 2, pp. ...

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    ALMA-IMF. I. Investigating the origin of stellar masses: Introduction to the Large Program and first results,

    F. Motte, S. Bontemps, T. Csengeri, Y. Pouteau, F. Louvet, A. M. Stutz, N. Cunningham, A. L´opez-Sepulcre, N. Brouillet, R. Galv´an-Madrid, A. Ginsburg, L. Maud, A. Men’shchikov, F. Nakamura, T. Nony, P. Sanhueza, R. H. ´Alvarez-Guti´errez, M. Armante, T. Baug, M. Bon- fand, G. Busquet, E. Chapillon, D. D ´ıaz-Gonz´alez, M. Fern ´andez-L´opez, A. E. Guzm ...

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    ALMA-IMF: XV. Core mass function in the high-mass star formation regime,

    F. Louvet, P. Sanhueza, A. Stutz, A. Men’shchikov, F. Motte, R. Galv ´an-Madrid, S. Bon- temps, Y. Pouteau, A. Ginsburg, T. Csengeri, J. Di Francesco, P. Dell’Ova, M. Gonz ´alez, P. Didelon, J. Braine, N. Cunningham, B. Thomasson, P. Lesaffre, P. Hennebelle, M. Bonfand, A. Gusdorf, R. H. ´Alvarez-Guti´errez, T. Nony, G. Busquet, F. Olguin, L. Bronfman, J....

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores 19 with ALMA (DIHCA). IV. Fragmentation in High-mass Star-forming Clumps,

    K. Ishihara, P. Sanhueza, F. Nakamura, M. Saito, H.-R. V. Chen, S. Li, F. Olguin, K. Taniguchi, K. Morii, X. Lu, Q.-y. Luo, T. Sakai, and Q. Zhang, “Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores 19 with ALMA (DIHCA). IV. Fragmentation in High-mass Star-forming Clumps,”ApJ, vol. 974, p. 95, Oct. 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    The sharp ALMA view of infall and outflow in the massive protocluster G31.41+0.31,

    M. T. Beltr ´an, V. M. Rivilla, R. Cesaroni, D. Galli, L. Moscadelli, A. Ahmadi, H. Beuther, S. Etoka, C. Goddi, P. D. Klaassen, R. Kuiper, M. S. N. Kumar, A. Lorenzani, T. Peters, ´A. S´anchez-Monge, P. Schilke, F. van der Tak, and S. Vig, “The sharp ALMA view of infall and outflow in the massive protocluster G31.41+0.31,”A&A, vol. 659, p. A81, Mar. 2022

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Accretion and magnetic field morphology around Class 0 stage protostellar discs,

    D. Seifried, R. Banerjee, R. E. Pudritz, and R. S. Klessen, “Accretion and magnetic field morphology around Class 0 stage protostellar discs,” MNRAS, vol. 446, pp. 2776–2788, Jan. 2015

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Discs are born eccentric,

    B. Commerc ¸on, F. Lovascio, E. Lynch, and E. Ragusa, “Discs are born eccentric,” A&A, vol. 689, p. L9, Sept. 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    A protostellar system fed by a streamer of 10,500 au length,

    J. E. Pineda, D. Segura-Cox, P. Caselli, N. Cunningham, B. Zhao, A. Schmiedeke, M. J. Maureira, and R. Neri, “A protostellar system fed by a streamer of 10,500 au length,” Nature Astronomy, vol. 4, pp. 1158–1163, Jan. 2020

    work page 2020

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Detection of Irregular, Submillimeter Opaque Structures in the Orion Molecular Clouds: Protostars within 10,000 yr of Formation?,

    N. Karnath, S. T. Megeath, J. J. Tobin, A. Stutz, Z. Y. Li, P. Sheehan, N. Reynolds, S. Sadavoy, I. W. Stephens, M. Osorio, G. Anglada, A. K. D ´ıaz-Rodr´ıguez, and E. Cox, “Detection of Irregular, Submillimeter Opaque Structures in the Orion Molecular Clouds: Protostars withi...

    2020

  2. [10]

    Gravity-driven Magnetic Field at 1000 au Scales in High-mass Star Formation,

    P. Sanhueza, J. M. Girart, M. Padovani, D. Galli, C. L. H. Hull, Q. Zhang, P. Cortes, I. W. Stephens, M. Fern ´andez-L´opez, J. M. Jackson, P. Frau, P. M. Kock, B. Wu, L. A. Zapata, F. Olguin, X. Lu, A. Silva, Y.-W. Tang, T. Sakai, A. E. Guzm´an, K. Tatematsu, F. Nakamura, and...

    2021

  3. [11]

    Magnetic Fields in Massive Star-forming Regions (MagMaR). V. The Magnetic Field at the Onset of High-mass Star Formation,

    P. Sanhueza, J. Liu, K. Morii, J. M. Girart, Q. Zhang, I. W. Stephens, J. M. Jackson, P. C. Cort´es, P. M. Koch, C. J. Cyganowski, P. Saha, H. Beuther, S. Zhang, M. T. Beltr´an, Y. Cheng, F. A. Olguin, X. Lu, S. Choudhury, K. Pattle, M. Fern ´andez-L´opez, J. Hwang, J.-h. Kang...

    2025

  4. [12]

    Disk and Envelope Streamers of the GGD 27-MM1 Massive Protostar,

    M. Fern ´andez-L´opez, J. M. Girart, J. A. L ´opez-V´azquez, R. Estalella, G. Busquet, S. Curiel, and N. A˜nez-L´opez, “Disk and Envelope Streamers of the GGD 27-MM1 Massive Protostar,” ApJ, vol. 956, p. 82, Oct. 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    Probing the physics of star formation (ProPStar). II. The first systematic search for streamers toward protostars,

    M. T. Valdivia-Mena, J. E. Pineda, P. Caselli, D. M. Segura-Cox, A. Schmiedeke, S. Spezzano, S. Offner, A. V. Ivlev, M. Kuffmeier, N. Cunningham, R. Neri, and M. J. Maureira, “Probing the physics of star formation (ProPStar). II. The first systematic search for streamers towar...

    2024

  6. [14]

    Global and Local Infall in the ASHES Sample (GLASHES). I. Pilot Study in G337.541,

    K. Morii, P. Sanhueza, T. Csengeri, F. Nakamura, S. Bontemps, G. Garay, and Q. Zhang, “Global and Local Infall in the ASHES Sample (GLASHES). I. Pilot Study in G337.541,”ApJ, vol. 979, p. 233, Feb. 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    From Bubbles and Filaments to Cores and Disks: Gas Gathering and Growth of Structure Leading to the Formation of Stellar Systems,

    J. E. Pineda, D. Arzoumanian, P. Andre, R. K. Friesen, A. Zavagno, S. D. Clarke, T. Inoue, C. Chen, Y. Lee, J. D. Soler, and M. Kuffmeier, “From Bubbles and Filaments to Cores and Disks: Gas Gathering and Growth of Structure Leading to the Formation of Stellar Systems,” in Pro...

    2023

  8. [16]

    An Observational View of Structure in Protostellar Systems,

    J. J. Tobin and P. D. Sheehan, “An Observational View of Structure in Protostellar Systems,” ARA&A, vol. 62, pp. 203–241, Sept. 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Cloudlet capture by transitional disk and FU Orionis stars,

    C. P. Dullemond, M. K¨ uffmeier, F. Goicovic, M. Fukagawa, V. Oehl, and M. Kramer, “Cloudlet capture by transitional disk and FU Orionis stars,” A&A, vol. 628, p. A20, Aug. 2019

    2019

  10. [18]

    Cloudlet Capture Model for Asymmetric Molecular Emission Lines Observed in TMC-1A with ALMA,

    T. Hanawa, N. Sakai, and S. Yamamoto, “Cloudlet Capture Model for Asymmetric Molecular Emission Lines Observed in TMC-1A with ALMA,” ApJ, vol. 932, p. 122, June 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Dense Core Collisions in Molecular Clouds: Formation of Streamers and Binary Stars,

    Y. Yano, F. Nakamura, and S. W. Kinoshita, “Dense Core Collisions in Molecular Clouds: Formation of Streamers and Binary Stars,” ApJ, vol. 964, p. 119, Apr. 2024. 21

    2024

  12. [20]

    On the Formation of Massive Stars,

    H. W. Yorke and C. Sonnhalter, “On the Formation of Massive Stars,”ApJ, vol. 569, pp. 846– 862, Apr. 2002

    2002

  13. [21]

    The Impact of Feedback During Massive Star Formation by Core Accretion,

    K. E. I. Tanaka, J. C. Tan, and Y. Zhang, “The Impact of Feedback During Massive Star Formation by Core Accretion,” ApJ, vol. 835, p. 32, Jan. 2017

    2017

  14. [22]

    First hydrodynamics simulations of radiation forces and pho- toionization feedback in massive star formation,

    R. Kuiper and T. Hosokawa, “First hydrodynamics simulations of radiation forces and pho- toionization feedback in massive star formation,”A&A, vol. 616, p. A101, Aug. 2018

    2018

  15. [23]

    Discs and out- flows in the early phases of massive star formation: Influence of magnetic fields and ambipolar diffusion,

    B. Commerc ¸on, M. Gonz´alez, R. Mignon-Risse, P. Hennebelle, and N. Vaytet, “Discs and out- flows in the early phases of massive star formation: Influence of magnetic fields and ambipolar diffusion,” A&A, vol. 658, p. A52, Feb. 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    A Massive Star Is Born: How Feedback from Stellar Winds, Radiation Pressure, and Collimated Outflows Limits Accretion onto Massive Stars,

    A. L. Rosen, “A Massive Star Is Born: How Feedback from Stellar Winds, Radiation Pressure, and Collimated Outflows Limits Accretion onto Massive Stars,” ApJ, vol. 941, p. 202, Dec. 2022

    2022

  17. [25]

    ATLASGAL - properties of a complete sample of Galactic clumps,

    J. S. Urquhart, C. K ¨onig, A. Giannetti, S. Leurini, T. J. T. Moore, D. J. Eden, T. Pillai, M. A. Thompson, C. Braiding, M. G. Burton, T. Csengeri, J. T. Dempsey, C. Figura, D. Froebrich, K. M. Menten, F. Schuller, M. D. Smith, and F. Wyrowski, “ATLASGAL - properties of a com...

    2018

  18. [26]

    Zooming in on Individual Star Formation: Low- and High-Mass Stars,

    A. L. Rosen, S. S. R. Offner, S. I. Sadavoy, A. Bhandare, E. V´azquez-Semadeni, and A. Gins- burg, “Zooming in on Individual Star Formation: Low- and High-Mass Stars,”SSRv, vol. 216, p. 62, May 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Early Planet Formation in Embedded Disks (eDisk). I. Overview of the Program and First Results,

    N. Ohashi, J. J. Tobin, J. K. Jørgensen, S. Takakuwa, P. Sheehan, Y. Aikawa, Z.-Y. Li, L. W. Looney, J. P. Williams, Y. Aso, R. Sharma, J. I. C. Sai, Y. Yamato, J.-E. Lee, K. Tomida, H.-W. Yen, F. J. Encalada, C. Flores, S. Gavino, M. Kido, I. Han, Z.-Y. D. Lin, S. Narayanan, ...

    2023

  20. [28]

    Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores with ALMA: Spiral Accretion into the High-mass Protostellar Core G336.01-0.82,

    F. A. Olguin, P. Sanhueza, H.-R. V. Chen, X. Lu, Y. Oya, Q. Zhang, A. Ginsburg, K. Taniguchi, S. Li, K. Morii, T. Sakai, and F. Nakamura, “Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores with ALMA: Spiral Accretion into the High-mass Protostellar Core G336.01-0.82,”ApJL, vol. 959, p. L...

    2023

  21. [29]

    FERIA: Flat Envelope Model with Rotation and Infall under Angular Momentum Conservation,

    Y. Oya, H. Kibukawa, S. Miyake, and S. Yamamoto, “FERIA: Flat Envelope Model with Rotation and Infall under Angular Momentum Conservation,”PASP, vol. 134, p. 094301, Sept. 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    G11.92-0.61 MM 1: A Fragmented Keplerian Disk Surrounding a Proto-O Star,

    J. D. Ilee, C. J. Cyganowski, C. L. Brogan, T. R. Hunter, D. H. Forgan, T. J. Haworth, C. J. Clarke, and T. J. Harries, “G11.92-0.61 MM 1: A Fragmented Keplerian Disk Surrounding a Proto-O Star,” ApJL, vol. 869, p. L24, Dec. 2018

    2018

  23. [31]

    Multidirectional Mass Accretion and Collimated Outflows on Scales of 100-2000 au in Early Stages of High-mass Protostars,

    C. Goddi, A. Ginsburg, L. T. Maud, Q. Zhang, and L. A. Zapata, “Multidirectional Mass Accretion and Collimated Outflows on Scales of 100-2000 au in Early Stages of High-mass Protostars,” ApJ, vol. 905, p. 25, Dec. 2020

    2000

  24. [32]

    Spiral arms and instability within the AFGL 4176 mm1 disc,

    K. G. Johnston, M. G. Hoare, H. Beuther, R. Kuiper, N. D. Kee, H. Linz, P. Boley, L. T. Maud, A. Ahmadi, and T. P. Robitaille, “Spiral arms and instability within the AFGL 4176 mm1 disc,” A&A, vol. 634, p. L11, Feb. 2020

    2020

  25. [33]

    A massive Keplerian protostellar disk with flyby- induced spirals in the Central Molecular Zone,

    X. Lu, G.-X. Li, Q. Zhang, and Y. Lin, “A massive Keplerian protostellar disk with flyby- induced spirals in the Central Molecular Zone,” Nature Astronomy, vol. 6, pp. 837–843, May 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    Analytic solutions to the accretion of a rotating finite cloud towards a central object - I. Newtonian approach,

    S. Mendoza, E. Tejeda, and E. Nagel, “Analytic solutions to the accretion of a rotating finite cloud towards a central object - I. Newtonian approach,”MNRAS, vol. 393, pp. 579–586, Feb. 2009

    2009

  27. [35]

    Modeling disk fragmentation and multiplicity in massive star formation,

    G. A. Oliva and R. Kuiper, “Modeling disk fragmentation and multiplicity in massive star formation,” A&A, vol. 644, p. A41, Dec. 2020

    2020

  28. [36]

    PRODIGE - envelope to disk with NOEMA. I. A 3000 au streamer feeding a Class I protostar,

    M. T. Valdivia-Mena, J. E. Pineda, D. M. Segura-Cox, P. Caselli, R. Neri, A. L´opez-Sepulcre, N. Cunningham, L. Bouscasse, D. Semenov, T. Henning, V. Pi ´etu, E. Chapillon, A. Dutrey, 23 A. Fuente, S. Guilloteau, T. H. Hsieh, I. Jim ´enez-Serra, S. Marino, M. J. Maureira, G. V...

    2022

  29. [37]

    PRODIGE - envelope to disk with NOEMA. II. Small-scale tem- perature structure and streamer feeding the SVS13A protobinary based on CH3CN and DCN,

    T. H. Hsieh, D. M. Segura-Cox, J. E. Pineda, P. Caselli, L. Bouscasse, R. Neri, A. Lopez- Sepulcre, M. T. Valdivia-Mena, M. J. Maureira, T. Henning, G. V. Smirnov-Pinchukov, D. Se- menov, T. M¨oller, N. Cunningham, A. Fuente, S. Marino, A. Dutrey, M. Tafalla, E. Chapillon, C. ...

    2023

  30. [38]

    Accretion Flows or Outflow Cavities? Uncovering the Gas Dynamics around Lupus 3-MMS,

    T. J. Thieme, S.-P. Lai, S.-J. Lin, P.-I. Cheong, C.-F. Lee, H.-W. Yen, Z.-Y. Li, K. H. Lam, and B. Zhao, “Accretion Flows or Outflow Cavities? Uncovering the Gas Dynamics around Lupus 3-MMS,” ApJ, vol. 925, p. 32, Jan. 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    ALMA survey of massive cluster progenitors from ATLASGAL. Limited fragmentation at the early evolutionary stage of massive clumps,

    T. Csengeri, S. Bontemps, F. Wyrowski, F. Motte, K. M. Menten, H. Beuther, L. Bronfman, B. Commerc ¸on, E. Chapillon, A. Duarte-Cabral, G. A. Fuller, T. Henning, S. Leurini, S. Long- more, A. Palau, N. Peretto, F. Schuller, J. C. Tan, L. Testi, A. Traficante, and J. S. Urquhar...

    2017

  32. [40]

    A Photoionized Accretion Disk around a Young High-mass Star,

    A. E. Guzm ´an, P. Sanhueza, L. Zapata, G. Garay, and L. F. Rodr ´ıguez, “A Photoionized Accretion Disk around a Young High-mass Star,”ApJ, vol. 904, p. 77, Nov. 2020

    2020

  33. [41]

    CASA, the Common Astronomy Software Applications for Radio Astronomy,

    CASA Team, B. Bean, S. Bhatnagar, S. Castro, J. Donovan Meyer, B. Emonts, E. Garcia, R. Gar- wood, K. Golap, J. G. Villalba, P. Harris, Y. Hayashi, J. Hoskins, M. Hsieh, P. Jagannathan, W. Kawasaki, A. Keimpema, M. Kettenis, J. Lopez, J. Marvil, J. Masters, A. McNichols, D. Me...

    2022

  34. [42]

    Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores with ALMA (DIHCA). I. Dissecting the High-mass Star-forming Core G335.579-0.292 MM1,

    F. A. Olguin, P. Sanhueza, A. E. Guzm ´an, X. Lu, K. Saigo, Q. Zhang, A. Silva, H.-R. V. Chen, S. Li, S. Ohashi, F. Nakamura, T. Sakai, and B. Wu, “Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores with ALMA (DIHCA). I. Dissecting the High-mass Star-forming Core G335.579-0.292 MM1,” ApJ,...

    2021

  35. [43]

    Gocontinuum: continuum finding tool,

    F. Olguin and P. Sanhueza, “Gocontinuum: continuum finding tool,” Zenodo, May 2025

    2025

  36. [44]

    Infall Signatures in a Prestellar Core Embedded in the High-mass 70𝜇m Dark IRDC G331.372-00.116,

    Y. Contreras, P. Sanhueza, J. M. Jackson, A. E. Guzm ´an, S. Longmore, G. Garay, Q. Zhang, Q. Nguy ˜ˆen-Lu’o’ng, K. Tatematsu, F. Nakamura, T. Sakai, S. Ohashi, T. Liu, M. Saito, L. Gomez, J. Rathborne, and S. Whitaker, “Infall Signatures in a Prestellar Core Embedded in the H...

    2018

  37. [45]

    Automatic Line Clean,

    Y. Contreras, “Automatic Line Clean,” Zenodo, Apr. 2018

    2018

  38. [46]

    The circumstellar disk of ab aurigae: evidence for envelope accretion at late stages of star formation?,

    Y.-W. Tang, S. Guilloteau, V. Pi´etu, A. Dutrey, N. Ohashi, and P. T. P. Ho, “The circumstellar disk of ab aurigae: evidence for envelope accretion at late stages of star formation?,” A&A, vol. 547, p. A84, Nov. 2012

    2012

  39. [47]

    Dust opacities for protostellar cores.,

    V. Ossenkopf and T. Henning, “Dust opacities for protostellar cores.,”A&A, vol. 291, pp. 943– 959, Nov. 1994

    1994

  40. [48]

    Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance.,

    N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev, “Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance.,” A&A, vol. 24, pp. 337–355, Jan. 1973

    1973

  41. [49]

    Three-dimensional Simulation of Massive Star Formation in the Disk Accretion Scenario,

    R. Kuiper, H. Klahr, H. Beuther, and T. Henning, “Three-dimensional Simulation of Massive Star Formation in the Disk Accretion Scenario,” ApJ, vol. 732, p. 20, May 2011

    2011

  42. [50]

    Massive Protostellar Disks as a Hot Labora- tory of Silicate Grain Evolution,

    R. Yamamuro, K. E. I. Tanaka, and S. Okuzumi, “Massive Protostellar Disks as a Hot Labora- tory of Silicate Grain Evolution,” ApJ, vol. 949, p. 29, May 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    MAMBO mapping of Spitzer c2d small clouds and cores,

    J. Kauffmann, F. Bertoldi, T. L. Bourke, N. J. Evans, II, and C. W. Lee, “MAMBO mapping of Spitzer c2d small clouds and cores,” A&A, vol. 487, pp. 993–1017, Sept. 2008

    2008

  44. [52]

    Fila- mentary Accretion Flows in the Embedded Serpens South Protocluster,

    H. Kirk, P. C. Myers, T. L. Bourke, R. A. Gutermuth, A. Hedden, and G. W. Wilson, “Fila- mentary Accretion Flows in the Embedded Serpens South Protocluster,”ApJ, vol. 766, p. 115, Apr. 2013. 25

    2013

  45. [53]

    Observations on the Formation of Massive Stars by Accretion,

    E. Keto and K. Wood, “Observations on the Formation of Massive Stars by Accretion,” ApJ, vol. 637, pp. 850–859, Feb. 2006

    2006

  46. [54]

    Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy,

    Astropy Collaboration, T. P. Robitaille, E. J. Tollerud, P. Greenfield, M. Droettboom, E. Bray, T. Aldcroft, M. Davis, A. Ginsburg, A. M. Price-Whelan, W. E. Kerzendorf, A. Conley, N. Crighton, K. Barbary, D. Muna, H. Ferguson, F. Grollier, M. M. Parikh, P. H. Nair, H. M. Unth...

    2013

  47. [55]

    The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package,

    Astropy Collaboration, A. M. Price-Whelan, B. M. Sip ˝ocz, H. M. G¨ unther, P. L. Lim, S. M. Crawford, S. Conseil, D. L. Shupe, M. W. Craig, N. Dencheva, A. Ginsburg, J. T. Vand erPlas, L. D. Bradley, D. P ´erez-Su´arez, M. de Val-Borro, T. L. Aldcroft, K. L. Cruz, T. P. Robit...

    2018

  48. [56]

    The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open- source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package,

    Astropy Collaboration, A. M. Price-Whelan, P. L. Lim, N. Earl, N. Starkman, L. Bradley, D. L. Shupe, A. A. Patil, L. Corrales, C. E. Brasseur, M. N”othe, A. Donath, E. Tollerud, B. M. Morris, A. Ginsburg, E. Vaher, B. A. Weaver, J. Tocknell, W. Jamieson, M. H. van Kerkwijk, T....

    2022

  49. [57]

    Scientific colour maps,

    F. Crameri, “Scientific colour maps,” Zenodo, Oct. 2023. 27

    2023

  50. [58]

    The misuse of colour in science communication,

    F. Crameri, G. E. Shephard, and P. J. Heron, “The misuse of colour in science communication,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, p. 5444, Oct. 2020

    2020

  51. [59]

    Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores with the ALMA (DIHCA). III. The Chemical Link between NH 2CHO, HNCO, and H 2CO,

    K. Taniguchi, P. Sanhueza, F. A. Olguin, P. Gorai, A. Das, F. Nakamura, M. Saito, Q. Zhang, X. Lu, S. Li, and H.-R. V. Chen, “Digging into the Interior of Hot Cores with the ALMA (DIHCA). III. The Chemical Link between NH 2CHO, HNCO, and H 2CO,” ApJ, vol. 950, p. 57, June 2023...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.