pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.15912 · v2 · pith:LZZUQD7Ynew · submitted 2025-08-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · nucl-th

f-mode Oscillations for Hyperons and H-dibaryons in Neutron Stars

Rajesh Maiti , Jesper Leong , Debarati Chatterjee , Anthony W. Thomas This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 22:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE nucl-th
keywords neutron starsf-mode oscillationshyperonsH-dibaryonsquark meson coupling modeluniversal relationsgravitational wavesCowling approximation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hyperons and H-dibaryons modify f-mode frequencies and universal relations in neutron stars when treated inside the quark meson coupling model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the fundamental oscillation modes of neutron stars by extending the quark meson coupling model to include hyperons and H-dibaryons along with possible short-range repulsion. It computes how these exotic degrees of freedom shift the f-mode frequencies and tests whether previously known universal relations between mode frequency, stellar mass, and radius continue to hold. The calculations are performed in the relativistic Cowling approximation, which simplifies the treatment of spacetime perturbations while retaining the key effects of the dense-matter equation of state. If the results are correct, f-mode observations from future gravitational-wave detectors could constrain the presence and interactions of hyperons or dibaryons inside neutron-star cores.

Core claim

Within the quark meson coupling model, which accounts for the self-consistent change in valence-quark structure of baryons in strong Lorentz scalar fields, the inclusion of hyperons and H-dibaryons together with optional short-range repulsion alters the f-mode frequencies of neutron stars. Universal relations linking f-mode frequency, compactness, and tidal deformability remain approximately valid under the relativistic Cowling approximation and can be compared with earlier results for applications in gravitational-wave asteroseismology.

What carries the argument

The quark meson coupling model extended to hyperons and H-dibaryons, with self-consistent valence-quark modification in Lorentz scalar mean fields, used to generate the equation of state for f-mode calculations in the relativistic Cowling approximation.

If this is right

  • Universal relations between f-mode frequency, stellar mass, and radius continue to hold to good accuracy even after hyperons and H-dibaryons are added.
  • Additional short-range repulsion between hyperons or dibaryons produces measurable shifts in the f-mode spectrum.
  • The same model framework yields equations of state that can be directly compared with existing literature results for gravitational-wave asteroseismology.
  • Observations of f-modes could in principle distinguish equations of state that contain hyperons or H-dibaryons from those that do not.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the universal relations survive the addition of these particles, they could serve as a cleaner probe of neutron-star structure in future detectors than models that ignore hyperons.
  • A mismatch between observed f-modes and the model predictions would point either to missing physics in the quark meson coupling treatment or to the absence of hyperons and dibaryons at the relevant densities.
  • The approach could be extended to other exotic particles such as delta resonances or strangelets to test how robust the universal relations remain.

Load-bearing premise

The quark meson coupling model continues to describe the interactions and structure of hyperons and H-dibaryons correctly at the densities found in neutron-star cores.

What would settle it

A gravitational-wave detection of an f-mode frequency from a known-mass neutron star that lies outside the range predicted when hyperons or H-dibaryons are included in the quark meson coupling model would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.15912 by Anthony W. Thomas, Debarati Chatterjee, Jesper Leong, Rajesh Maiti.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The normalised effective masses in QMC Overlap-B [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Particle fractions with increasing density have been displayed for the “Overlap-B” (top-panel) and the “EVE-C” [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The EoS for different QMC parametrisations used in this work for both a) QMC and b) HDR. The solid lines correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The mass-radius relations for the EoS parametrisations shown in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The central number density, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Mass scaled frequencies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. We examine the validity of the mass-scaled frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Comparison of mass-radius curves for different EoS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Comparison of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The fundamental ($f$-mode) oscillations of neutron stars are studied within the quark meson coupling model, a relativistic Hartree-Fock theory of dense nuclear matter, which takes into account the self-consistent modification of the valence quark structure of the bound baryons in the associated strong Lorentz scalar mean fields. For the first time, hyperons and H-dibaryons are included, along with the effects of potential additional short-range repulsion within this scheme, and their influence on $f$-modes is investigated. Universal relations are studied within the relativistic Cowling approximation and compared against those in the existing literature for potential applications in gravitational wave asteroseismology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the fundamental (f-mode) oscillations of neutron stars in the quark-meson coupling (QMC) model, a relativistic Hartree-Fock framework that incorporates self-consistent valence-quark structure modifications in strong Lorentz scalar fields. For the first time, hyperons and H-dibaryons are included together with optional additional short-range repulsion; their effects on f-mode frequencies are computed and universal relations are examined in the relativistic Cowling approximation for potential use in gravitational-wave asteroseismology.

Significance. If the underlying model extension is reliable, the work supplies the first systematic exploration of H-dibaryon effects on f-modes within a quark-level description of dense matter. The resulting universal relations, if robust, could furnish additional observables for constraining the dense-matter equation of state from future gravitational-wave data.

major comments (1)
  1. [Model and formalism] The central extrapolation—that the QMC model's self-consistent valence-quark modification in Lorentz scalar fields continues to apply to the six-quark H-dibaryon at the densities where it appears in the neutron-star core—is load-bearing for all reported f-mode frequencies and universal relations, yet receives no independent validation against lattice QCD or variational six-quark calculations.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Results] Clarify whether the short-range repulsion strength is treated as a free parameter or fixed by additional constraints; its value should be stated explicitly when results are presented.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed review and insightful comments on our manuscript arXiv:2508.15912. We address the major comment point by point below. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional discussion on model assumptions and limitations as appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Model and formalism] The central extrapolation—that the QMC model's self-consistent valence-quark modification in Lorentz scalar fields continues to apply to the six-quark H-dibaryon at the densities where it appears in the neutron-star core—is load-bearing for all reported f-mode frequencies and universal relations, yet receives no independent validation against lattice QCD or variational six-quark calculations.

    Authors: We acknowledge that extending the QMC framework to the H-dibaryon constitutes an extrapolation of the self-consistent valence-quark modification in Lorentz scalar fields, as the model was originally developed and validated primarily for three-quark baryons. The H-dibaryon is treated within the same relativistic Hartree-Fock scheme as a six-quark composite, with its effective mass and interactions determined consistently from the underlying quark-level dynamics and the same scalar mean fields. While direct lattice QCD or variational six-quark calculations at the relevant high densities are not yet available to provide independent validation, the approach builds on prior QMC applications to hyperons and is consistent with the model's quark-meson coupling philosophy. We agree that this assumption is central and have added a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript (Section II and the discussion of results) explicitly stating the extrapolation, its motivation from the model's success with baryons, and the current lack of high-density multi-quark benchmarks, along with references to existing low-density variational studies of the H-dibaryon. revision: partial

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The quark meson coupling model itself contains several fitted parameters for meson-baryon couplings and short-range repulsion terms whose values are not stated in the abstract; the relativistic Cowling approximation is an additional modeling choice whose accuracy is not quantified here.

free parameters (1)
  • short-range repulsion strength
    Mentioned as 'potential additional short-range repulsion' whose concrete value must be chosen to stabilize the equation of state at high density.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The quark meson coupling model remains valid when hyperons and H-dibaryons are present at neutron-star densities.
    The abstract invokes the model without additional justification for the new degrees of freedom.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5649 in / 1142 out tokens · 28588 ms · 2026-05-21T22:03:47.697661+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · 32 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    a” and “ b

    when comparing νf at their maximum masses. There are many differences between the QMC model and the models used in other studies. We provide a brief dis- cussion in the appendix but just like the H, hyperonic signatures in νf are also likely model-dependent. This could also give us clues to the types of interactions one might expect between baryons at hig...

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Overlap- B

    The f-modes for nucleonic EoS are larger at maxi- mum mass which is in conflict to previous studies [33, 51]. In Pradhan et al. , the Cowling approximation νf of hy- peronic EoS were higher than nucleonic EoS at each of their respective maximum masses. In contrast we do not find the same results here. We have checked that this is not idiosyncratic to the ...

    work page

  3. [3]

    J. M. Lattimer, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 71, 433 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Li et al., Dense Matter in Neutron Stars with eXTP (2025), arXiv:2506.08104 [astro-ph.HE]

    A. Li et al., Dense Matter in Neutron Stars with eXTP (2025), arXiv:2506.08104 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, J. N¨ attil¨ a, and A. Vuorinen, Nature Phys. 16, 907 (2020), arXiv:1903.09121 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    D. L. Whittenbury, H. H. Matevosyan, and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. C 93, 035807 (2016), arXiv:1511.08561 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    A new quark-hadron hybrid equation of state for astrophysics - I. High-mass twin compact stars

    S. Benic, D. Blaschke, D. E. Alvarez-Castillo, T. Fis- cher, and S. Typel, Astron. Astrophys. 577, A40 (2015), arXiv:1411.2856 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    Hadron-Quark Crossover and Massive Hybrid Stars with Strangeness

    K. Masuda, T. Hatsuda, and T. Takatsuka, Astrophys. J. 764, 12 (2013), arXiv:1205.3621 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  9. [9]

    T. F. Motta and A. W. Thomas, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 37, 2230001 (2022), arXiv:2201.11549 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    B. K. Agrawal and S. K. Dhiman, Phys. Rev. D 79, 103006 (2009), arXiv:0904.2946 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  11. [11]

    Cold uniform matter and neutron stars in the quark-mesons-coupling model

    J. Rikovska-Stone, P. A. M. Guichon, H. H. Matevosyan, and A. W. Thomas, Nucl. Phys. A 792, 341 (2007), arXiv:nucl-th/0611030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  12. [12]

    Strangeness in Neutron Stars

    F. Weber, A. Ho, R. P. Negreiros, and P. Rosenfield, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 16, 231 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0604422

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  13. [13]

    Hybrid stars that masquerade as neutron stars

    M. Alford, M. Braby, M. W. Paris, and S. Reddy, Astro- phys. J. 629, 969 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0411016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  14. [14]

    Maximum mass, moment of inertia and compactness of relativistic stars

    C. Breu and L. Rezzolla, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 459, 646 (2016), arXiv:1601.06083 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    N. K. Glendenning, Compact Stars: Nuclear Physics, Particle Physics and General Relativity , Astronomy and Astrophysics Library (Springer New York, 1997)

    work page 1997

  18. [18]

    Hybrid stars in the light of GW170817

    R. Nandi and P. Char, Astrophys. J. 857, 12 (2018), arXiv:1712.08094 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [19]

    J. J. Li, A. Sedrakian, and M. Alford, Phys. Rev. D 15 104, L121302 (2021), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 105, 109901 (2022)], arXiv:2108.13071 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    I. F. Ranea-Sandoval, O. M. Guilera, M. Mariani, and M. G. Orsaria, JCAP 12, 031, arXiv:1807.02166 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  21. [21]

    G. A. Contrera, D. Blaschke, J. P. Carlomagno, A. G. Grunfeld, and S. Liebing, Phys. Rev. C 105, 045808 (2022), arXiv:2201.00477 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Implications from GW170817 and I-Love-Q relations for relativistic hybrid stars

    V. Paschalidis, K. Yagi, D. Alvarez-Castillo, D. B. Blaschke, and A. Sedrakian, Phys. Rev. D 97, 084038 (2018), arXiv:1712.00451 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    R. L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 195 (1977), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 38, 617 (1977)]

    work page 1977

  24. [24]

    P. J. Mulders and A. W. Thomas, J. Phys. G 9, 1159 (1983)

    work page 1983

  25. [25]

    Leong, A

    J. Leong, A. W. Thomas, and P. A. M. Guichon, Heavy Neutron Star Phenomenology with an H-dibaryon (2025), arXiv:2503.21167 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Leong, A

    J. Leong, A. W. Thomas, and P. A. M. Guichon, in 16th Conference on Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spec- trum (2025) arXiv:2503.21171 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary

    J. Antoniadis et al. , Science 340, 6131 (2013), arXiv:1304.6875 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    D. J. Nice, E. M. Splaver, I. H. Stairs, O. Loehmer, A. Jessner, M. Kramer, and J. M. Cordes, Astrophys. J. 634, 1242 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0508050

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  29. [29]

    M. C. Miller et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L28 (2021), arXiv:2105.06979 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  30. [30]

    T. E. Riley et al. , Astrophys. J. Lett. 918, L27 (2021), arXiv:2105.06980 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  31. [31]

    Fonseca et al

    E. Fonseca et al. , Astrophys. J. Lett. 915, L12 (2021), arXiv:2104.00880 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    The Radius of the High Mass Pul- sar PSR J0740+6620 With 3.6 Years of NICER Data,

    T. Salmi et al. , Astrophys. J. 974, 294 (2024), arXiv:2406.14466 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    C. G. Bassa et al., Astrophys. J. Lett. 846, L20 (2017), arXiv:1709.01453 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    R. W. Romani, D. Kandel, A. V. Filippenko, T. G. Brink, and W. Zheng, Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L17 (2022), arXiv:2207.05124 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    B. K. Pradhan and D. Chatterjee, Physical Review C 103, 10.1103/physrevc.103.035810 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.035810 2021

  36. [36]

    B. K. Pradhan, D. Chatterjee, M. Lanoye, and P. Jaiku- mar, Phys. Rev. C 106, 015805 (2022), arXiv:2203.03141 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Living Reviews in Relativity 2, 2 (1999)

    work page 1999

  38. [38]

    Andersson, Universe 7, 10.3390/universe7040097 (2021)

    N. Andersson, Universe 7, 10.3390/universe7040097 (2021)

    work page doi:10.3390/universe7040097 2021

  39. [40]

    B. K. Pradhan, D. Pathak, and D. Chatterjee, Astrophys. J. 956, 38 (2023), arXiv:2306.04626 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [41]

    O. H. Wilson and W. C. G. Ho, Phys. Rev. D109, 083006 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [42]

    W. C. G. Ho, D. I. Jones, N. Andersson, and C. M. Es- pinoza, Phys. Rev. D 101, 103009 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [43]

    Montefusco, M

    G. Montefusco, M. Antonelli, and F. Gulminelli, Astron. Astrophys. 694, A150 (2025), arXiv:2410.08008 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [44]

    O. P. Jyothilakshmi, P. E. S. Krishnan, V. Sreekanth, H. Chandrakar, and T. K. Jha, Symmetry 17, 10.3390/sym17020230 (2025)

    work page doi:10.3390/sym17020230 2025

  44. [45]

    Shirke, B

    S. Shirke, B. K. Pradhan, D. Chatterjee, L. Sagunski, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Phys. Rev. D 110, 063025 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [46]

    Thakur, A

    P. Thakur, A. Kumar, V. B. Thapa, V. Parmar, and M. Sinha, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2024 (12), 042

    work page 2024

  46. [47]

    T. G. Cowling, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 101, 367 (1941), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/101/8/367/8071901/mnras101-0367.pdf

    work page 1941

  47. [48]

    K. S. Thorne and A. Campolattaro, Astro Phys. Journal 149, 591 (1967)

    work page 1967

  48. [49]

    Andersson and K

    N. Andersson and K. D. Kokkotas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4134 (1996)

    work page 1996

  49. [50]

    Towards gravitational-wave asteroseismology

    N. Andersson and K. D. Kokkotas, Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc. 299, 1059 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9711088

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  50. [51]

    Benhar, V

    O. Benhar, V. Ferrari, and L. Gualtieri, Phys. Rev. D 70, 124015 (2004)

    work page 2004

  51. [52]

    D. D. Doneva, E. Gaertig, K. D. Kokkotas, and C. Kr¨ uger, Phys. Rev. D88, 044052 (2013)

    work page 2013

  52. [53]

    I. A. Rather, K. D. Marquez, P. Thakur, and O. Louren¸ co, Phys. Rev. D112, 023013 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [54]

    D. Dey, J. A. Pattnaik, M. Bhuyan, R. N. Panda, and S. K. Patra, JCAP 2025 (8), 003, arXiv:2412.06739 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [55]

    P. A. M. Guichon, Phys. Lett. B 200, 235 (1988)

    work page 1988

  55. [56]

    P. A. M. Guichon, K. Saito, E. N. Rodionov, and A. W. Thomas, Nucl. Phys. A 601, 349 (1996), arXiv:nucl- th/9509034

    work page arXiv 1996

  56. [57]

    P. A. M. Guichon and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 132502 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0402064

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  57. [58]

    P. A. M. Guichon, H. H. Matevosyan, N. Sandulescu, and A. W. Thomas, Nucl. Phys. A 772, 1 (2006), arXiv:nucl- th/0603044

    work page arXiv 2006

  58. [59]

    K. L. Martinez, A. W. Thomas, J. R. Stone, and P. A. M. Guichon, Phys. Rev. C 100, 024333 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [60]

    J. R. Stone, P. A. M. Guichon, and A. W. Thomas, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences9, 10.3389/fs- pas.2022.903007 (2022)

    work page doi:10.3389/fs- 2022

  60. [61]

    P. A. M. Guichon, J. R. Stone, and A. W. Thomas, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 100, 262 (2018), arXiv:1802.08368 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  61. [62]

    T. A. DeGrand, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and J. E. Kiskis, Phys. Rev. D 12, 2060 (1975)

    work page 2060

  62. [63]

    P. A. M. Guichon, A. W. Thomas, and K. Tsushima, Nucl. Phys. A 814, 66 (2008), arXiv:0712.1925 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  63. [64]

    Tsushima, K

    K. Tsushima, K. Saito, J. Haidenbauer, and A. Thomas, Nuclear Physics A 630, 691 (1998)

    work page 1998

  64. [65]

    Hyperonic stars and the symmetry energy

    C. Providˆ encia, M. Fortin, H. Pais, and A. Rabhi, Hyperonic stars and the symmetry energy (2018), arXiv:1811.00786 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  65. [66]

    J. R. Stone, N. J. Stone, and S. A. Moszkowski, Phys. Rev. C 89, 044316 (2014), arXiv:1404.0744 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  66. [67]

    Leong, T

    J. Leong, T. F. Motta, A. W. Thomas, and P. A. M. Guichon, Phys. Rev. C 108, 015804 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [68]

    Effects of Fock term, tensor coupling and baryon structure variation on a neutron star

    T. Miyatsu, T. Katayama, and K. Saito, Phys. Lett. B 709, 242 (2012), arXiv:1110.3868 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  68. [69]

    Fock terms in the quark-meson coupling model

    G. Krein, A. W. Thomas, and K. Tsushima, Nucl. Phys. A 650, 313 (1999), arXiv:nucl-th/9810023

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  69. [70]

    P. A. M. Guichon, J. R. Stone, and A. W. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083035 (2024), arXiv:2310.19262 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [71]

    Harvey, J

    M. Harvey, J. Letourneux, and B. Lorazo, Nucl. Phys. A 424, 428 (1984)

    work page 1984

  71. [72]

    Novel Six-Quark Hidden-Color Dibaryon States in QCD

    M. Bashkanov, S. J. Brodsky, and H. Clement, Phys. Lett. B 727, 438 (2013), arXiv:1308.6404 [hep-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  72. [73]

    Puzzles in Hadronic Physics and Novel Quantum Chromodynamics Phenomenology

    S. Brodsky, G. de Teramond, and M. Karliner, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 2082 (2011), arXiv:1302.5684 [hep- ph]. 16

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2082

  73. [74]

    J. M. Berryman and S. Gardner, Phys. Rev. C 104, 045802 (2021), arXiv:2105.05254 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  74. [75]

    Leong, A

    J. Leong, A. W. Thomas, and P. A. M. Guichon, Nucl. Phys. A 1050, 122928 (2024), arXiv:2308.08987 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [76]

    P. K. Panda, M. E. Bracco, M. Chiapparini, E. Conte, and G. Krein, Phys. Rev. C 65, 065206 (2002), arXiv:nucl-th/0205051

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  76. [77]

    R. M. Aguirre and A. L. De Paoli, Phys. Rev. C 68, 055804 (2003), arXiv:nucl-th/0211038

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  77. [78]

    D. H. Rischke, M. I. Gorenstein, H. Stoecker, and W. Greiner, Z. Phys. C 51, 485 (1991)

    work page 1991

  78. [79]

    Gal, Phys

    A. Gal, Phys. Lett. B 857, 138973 (2024), arXiv:2404.12801 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [80]

    Ejiri, E

    H. Ejiri, E. Takasugi, T. Kishimoto, H. Ohsumi, J. Tanaka, and A. Kashitani, Phys. Lett. B 228, 24 (1989)

    work page 1989

  80. [81]

    C. B. Dover, Nuovo Cim. A 102, 521 (1989)

    work page 1989

Showing first 80 references.