Recognition: unknown
A Scalable Heuristic for Molecular Docking on Neutral-Atom Quantum Processors
read the original abstract
Molecular docking is a critical computational method in drug discovery used to predict the binding conformation and orientation of a ligand within a protein's binding site. Mapping this challenge onto a graph-based problem, specifically the Maximum Weighted Independent Set (MWIS) problem, allows it to be addressed by specialized hardware such as neutral-atom quantum processors. However, a significant bottleneck has been the size mismatch between biologically relevant molecular systems and the limited capacity of near-term quantum devices. In this work, we overcome this scaling limitation by the use of a divide-and-conquer heuristic introduced in Cazals 2025. This algorithm decomposes a single, intractable graph instance into smaller sub-problems that can be solved sequentially on a neutral-atom quantum emulator, incurring only a linear computational overhead. We benchmark this approach on 10 real-world protein-ligand complexes, including 9 from the Astex Diverse Set, with graphs ranging from 225 to 585 vertices. The quantum heuristic consistently outperforms a greedy baseline and achieves the provably optimal solution on a 540-node instance (TACE-AS). We further assess the biological relevance of the reconstructed poses via the fraction of native contacts, and benchmark the full workflow on a standard dataset of diverse protein-ligand complexes. Our work establishes a scalable blueprint for applying quantum optimization to molecular docking, while identifying concrete directions for improving both the algorithmic strategy and the underlying graph model.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Efficient mapping of multi-constraint satisfaction problems to Rydberg platforms
A compact xor_1 gadget enforces exactly-one constraints on Rydberg arrays via fixed-detuning blockade, cutting detuning range by up to 99% and atom/connectivity overhead by up to 54% versus QUBO for gate assignment an...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.