Wave coarsening drives time crystallization in active solids

Andres Hunt; Anton Souslov; Corentin Coulais; Damien Robledo-Poisson; Jack Binysh; Jonas Veenstra; Rutger Naber; Vito Seinen; Wim van Saarloos

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Wave coarsening drives time crystallization in active solids

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper reports that active elastic solids reach a time-crystalline state through wave coarsening—self-excited vibrations whose wavelength, period and amplitude all grow together—and that the inverse correlation length decays as a power l

desk verdict Wave coarsening is a real and well-observed phenomenon with two nice experimental platforms, but the quantitative scaling law is soft because the nonlinear saturation put into the theory was chosen, not measured. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20052 v1 pith:NKLYZGT7 submitted 2025-08-27 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.stat-mechnlin.AOnlin.PS

Jonas Veenstra , Jack Binysh , Vito Seinen , Rutger Naber , Damien Robledo-Poisson , Andres Hunt , Wim van Saarloos , Anton Souslov

show 1 more author

Corentin Coulais

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.stat-mechnlin.AOnlin.PS

keywords wavecoarseningtimecrystalsoddelasticityactivesolidsnon-reciprocalinteractionsdynamicsmetamaterialsRayleighedgewaves

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Classical coarsening, like the growth of domains in a cooling magnet or an emulsion, is driven by diffusion relaxing a system toward equilibrium. This paper reports an inertial counterpart in active elastic solids: energy injected through non-reciprocal, momentum-conserving internal forces destabilizes shear modes, and the resulting traveling waves grow in wavelength, period, and amplitude until the entire solid oscillates as one, a time-crystalline state. The authors call this transient wave coarsening, observe it in a two-dimensional metamaterial of active hexagons and in a one-dimensional ring of active torsional units, and capture it with two continuum models. A mean-field mode-coupling calculation gives a scaling law for the inverse correlation length, xi^{-1} ~ t^{-1/(2p)}, with p=1 for the odd-elastic 2D model and p=2 for the non-reciprocal beam, consistent with experiments. If the claim is right, it adds a new symmetry-controlled route to time crystallization, distinct from phase-locking synchronization and from equilibrium coarsening.

What carries the argument

The workhorse is the mean-field amplitude equation d|a_n|/dt / |a_n| = 1/2 (alpha/sqrt(1+U) q_n^p - q_n^{2p}), with p=1 for the 2D odd-elastic phi-model and p=2 for the 1D non-reciprocal beam. U(t) is the total squared amplitude and acts as a self-generated rescaling of the activity alpha: as energy grows, the most unstable wavenumber shifts down and its growth rate drops, so the dominant mode cascades to lower q. A peaked-wavepacket ansatz plus a power-law ansatz xi^{-1} ~ t^beta turns this into the paper's prediction beta = -1/(2p).

What would settle it

Run the 1D ring experiment with a deliberately different motor saturation curve, such as a hard torque limit instead of the smooth saturating law of Eq. S2, while keeping momentum conservation intact; if the inverse correlation length no longer follows t^{-1/4}, the proposed universal scaling from Eq. (4) is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that wave coarsening—a transient in which active waves grow in wavelength, period and amplitude—is a generic route to time crystallization in momentum-conserving active elastic media. The mechanism is a feedback loop: non-reciprocal elastic couplings inject energy while conserving momentum, creating a long-wave instability, and as modes amplify a nonlinear bath term rescales the effective activity downward. Each dominant mode becomes unstable to the next lower one, cascading to system size until the whole solid oscillates synchronously. The paper derives this from a mean-field amplitude equation and measures the resulting power laws in two metamaterials: a 2D honeycomb o

Load-bearing premise

The predicted scaling law assumes the nonlinearity that halts the linear instability has exactly the cubic (or saturating) form written into the two continuum models; if the real actuators or sensors saturate with a different functional form, the exponents would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the central claim is correct, any momentum-conserving active elastic medium with a non-reciprocal coupling and a quenched long-wave instability should show the same cascade: wavelength, period and amplitude growing together until system size or boundaries stop it.
Time crystallization would then be reachable without external periodic driving and without phase locking; the final synchronized oscillation is selected by conservation laws and geometry rather than by an applied clock.
The exponent relation beta = -1/(2p) is a measurable fingerprint: systems governed by a Laplacian shear mode (p=1) should coarsen as t^{-1/2}, while flexural non-reciprocal beam systems (p=2) should coarsen as t^{-1/4}.
Friction becomes a control parameter: breaking momentum conservation arrests coarsening at a tunable wavelength, which in turn controls the wavelength and penetration depth of the chiral edge waves observed in finite domains.
Boundary-dominated final states imply that the nature of the time crystal—bulk synchronized versus edge-dominated—depends on sample shape and boundary conditions, not only on bulk instability parameters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If wave coarsening is as generic as the paper suggests, analogous transients should appear in biological, optomechanical, or soft-robotic active solids that conserve momentum approximately; measuring the coarsening exponent there could test whether the energy injection is effectively non-reciprocal and momentum-conserving.
The paper leaves open whether the 1D exponent survives other saturation mechanisms; a clean test would be to swap the torque-motor saturation law in the ring for a hard-clip or quadratic saturation and check whether xi^{-1} still decays as t^{-1/4}.
Because the 2D process is accelerated by defect pair annihilation, a natural extension is to track the density of strain defects in the 2D material and test whether it decays as a power law and whether it sets the correlation length.
The unidirectionally amplified Rayleigh waves that invade the bulk in simulations suggest a far-from-equilibrium mechanical analogue of a topological amplifier; the friction-tuned penetration depth could be exploited to localize or direct vibrational energy.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

I'll cut to the chase. The paper convincingly shows something new: in momentum-conserving active elastic solids, an initial pattern of small-wavelength vibrations grows to longer wavelength, longer period, and larger amplitude until the whole system locks into a synchronized oscillation. They call it wave coarsening, and the distinction from diffusive coarsening is real. The experimental work is careful—two different platforms, friction control, repeated runs, correlation lengths extracted in a sensible way. The 1D ring data, with its clear mode-by-mode cascade, is the strongest part. The theory is transparent: a coarse-grained continuum equation with odd elasticity plus a saturating nonlinearity, and a mean-field mode-coupling reduction that produces a clean scaling prediction beta = -1/(2p). I think the phenomenon is real and the paper deserves a serious referee.

Now the soft spots, in proportion. The scaling law rests on a nonlinearity that is not derived from the actuators or sensors. The SM says outright (Section III) that they 'simply include nonlinearities that quench linear instabilities,' and Section VII says the beam saturation is chosen to mimic motor saturation. That is honest, but it means the quantitative prediction is conditional on the true nonlinear response having that functional form. The 1D ring's actual feedback is a hard piecewise-linear clip (SM Eq. S2), not the smooth saturating function in Eq. (3). The measured exponent is -0.29 against a predicted -0.25, with no error bars. That is in the direction you'd guess if hard clipping changes the effective scaling, but it is not enough to nail it. In 2D the mean-field approximation fails, and the paper says so; 2D coarsening is defect-dominated and faster. So the universal claim that momentum conservation gives -1/(2p) is plausible but not proven. The other soft spot is practical: no code or data are shared, which makes it harder to assess the fits and the correlation-length extraction. The citation pattern is fine, and the claims about prior work are accurate.

Who is this for? People working on active solids, non-reciprocal pattern formation, and time-crystal physics. A serious referee should not desk-reject it. My own verdict is conditional: the phenomenology is strong, the scaling is under-supported.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports experiments on two active elastic metamaterials—a 2D odd-elastic honeycomb and a 1D non-reciprocal motorized ring—that develop self-sustained oscillations after a Hopf instability. Instead of locking into a fixed pattern, the systems exhibit a transient in which wavelength, period, and amplitude all grow, eventually reaching a globally synchronized oscillatory state that the authors call a time crystal. This process, dubbed wave coarsening, is analyzed through continuum models [Eqs. (2) and (3)], a mean-field mode-coupling reduction [Eq. (4)], and numerical simulations. The central quantitative claim is the power-law scaling of the inverse correlation length, ξ⁻¹ ~ t^(−1/(2p)) with p = 1 for the 2D odd-elastic model and p = 2 for the 1D beam model, giving −1/2 and −1/4 respectively. The 1D experiment yields an exponent of about −0.29, consistent with −1/4 within unreported uncertainty. The paper also shows that substrate friction arrests coarsening and that chiral edge waves invade the bulk, with a nonlinear analogue of topological edge states.

Significance. If the claimed scaling and mechanism are robust, this work establishes a new class of coarsening phenomena: inertial, momentum-conserving energy injection drives a self-similar cascade to larger scales, distinct from the diffusive coarsening of phase-ordering kinetics. The study is valuable for its two independent experimental platforms, the controlled friction-arrest experiment, the explicit continuum models, and the unusually candid statements about the limits of the mean-field approximation. The claim that the scaling exponent is captured by a simple mean-field formula is the part of the paper that most needs scrutiny, because the nonlinear saturation is not derived from the microscopic actuator physics and the mean-field reduction is explicitly one-dimensional.

major comments (3)

[SM §III, §VII; Eq. (3) vs SM Eq. (S2)] The prediction β = −1/(2p) for the ring is obtained by replacing the actual nonlinear saturation of the torque motors with the smooth saturating function in Eq. (3). SM §VII states this substitution is made 'to mimic' motor saturation, and the true feedback is the hard piecewise-linear clip of SM Eq. (S2). The reduction from Eq. (3) to Eq. (4) uses the specific denominator √(1+(∂_x^3 h)^2); a hard clip law will generally produce a different effective mode coupling, so the exponent −1/4 is not shown to be a consequence of momentum conservation alone. The experimental fit ξ⁻¹ ∝ t^(−0.29) is in the expected direction, but no uncertainty is reported and the scatter in Fig. 3e is large. To make the quantitative scaling claim stand, the authors should demonstrate robustness by simulating the discrete hard-clip ring model (or deriving the saturation from actuator physics) and by reporting the f
[Main text, Fig. 2 and SM §VI] The mean-field derivation of Eq. (4) is one-dimensional in character: it is performed for scalar modes labelled by q_n (SM §VI) and, as the paper states, the approximation 'breaks down in 2D' where coarsening proceeds by strain-defect pair annihilation. Nevertheless Fig. 2(c,d) presents 2D numerical data with a −5/4 power law, and the abstract claims the dynamical scaling is captured. The 2D scaling is therefore neither derived from Eq. (4) nor connected to the mean-field exponent −1/(2p). If the central claim includes the 2D exponent, an analytical treatment of the defect-mediated regime is required; if not, the wording should be narrowed to avoid overclaiming.
[Fig. 3e and experimental fits] The comparison between theory and experiment for the 1D exponent is not quantitative as reported. The theoretical value is a clean −1/4, but the experimental exponent −0.29 is quoted without error bars, without a collapse across α, and without a statement of how many runs enter the fit (10 runs are mentioned in SM §I). Fig. 3e shows visible deviations at early and late times. Since the headline result is the scaling law, the fit uncertainty and sensitivity to the fitting window should be reported.

minor comments (4)

[Fig. 2 axes] The axis labels contain the garbled string 'pÆt'; this should presumably read 'αt' (or similar). Please fix the encoding.
[Fig. 4b caption] The caption says the steady-state inverse correlation length is found from 'numerical simulations of Eq. (4)', but the main text says Eq. (2) is integrated with an added friction term Γϕ̇. The caption and text should agree.
[Fig. 3e] Typo: 'inverse correlation lenth' should be 'inverse correlation length'.
[References] Journal abbreviations are inconsistent (e.g., 'Phys. Rev. E.' with a period versus 'Phys. Rev. E' without, and similar for other journals). A uniform style is needed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the scaling prediction follows from explicitly stated phenomenological nonlinearities and is validated against independent experiments; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claim—that wave coarsening is a momentum-conserving route to time crystallization with exponent β = −1/(2p)—is supported by independent experimental data in two platforms and by direct numerical simulations of the continuum PDEs. The analytical result is derived from Eq. (4) through an explicit mean-field reduction and power-law balancing (SM §VI–§VII); no exponent is fitted to data and then repackaged as a prediction. The nonlinear terms in Eqs. (2) and (3) are admittedly phenomenological: SM §III states 'we simply include nonlinearities that quench linear instabilities' and SM §VII states 'To mimic the saturation of the torque motors... we opt for the following substitution.' This makes the model conditional, but not circular, because the experimental exponents (e.g., −0.29 vs predicted −1/4 in the 1D ring) and the numerical exponents (e.g., 1D and 2D simulations of Eq. (2)) serve as external checks. The paper even reports that the mean-field approximation breaks down in 2D, showing the analysis is not tuned to reproduce every observation. Self-citations (Refs. 16 and 24) provide the linear nonreciprocal-beam equation and a coarse-graining recipe from prior peer-reviewed work by the same group; the coarsening derivation and its experimental test do not reduce to those citations. No uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no established result is merely renamed. The hard-clip torque saturation in SM Eq. (S2) versus the smooth saturation in Eq. (3) is a modeling approximation and a robustness concern, but it is not a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the choice of nonlinear saturation (ad hoc), the validity of the mean-field reduction (domain assumption, verified only in 1D), the absence of friction (domain assumption, tested by control), and the interpretation of the final state as a time crystal. No free parameters are fitted to the coarsening data; alpha is set by microscopic calibration. The only fit in the paper is the experimental 1D exponent -0.29, a measured result used for comparison, not a model parameter.

assumptions (4)

ad hoc to paper Nonlinear saturation is captured by the cubic term |phi|^2 phi in Eq. (2) and the saturating form in Eq. (3).
SM section III explicitly states the nonlinearity is included phenomenologically to quench the linear instability; not derived from actuator mechanics. This choice determines the predicted scaling exponents.
domain assumption Mean-field mode-coupling approximation: neglect phase-dependent cross terms (C=0) and assume a narrowly concentrated mode distribution.
SM section VI; numerically justified for 1D (Figs. S6, S8), but the paper acknowledges it breaks down in 2D where defect annihilation dominates coarsening.
domain assumption Friction is negligible in the coarsening experiments, so linear and angular momentum are conserved.
Methods describe PTFE lubrication; the friction-arrest experiment (Fig. 4a,b) uses removal of PTFE to break momentum conservation, implying conservation is essential.
domain assumption The self-sustained globally synchronized oscillation is a time crystal in the dissipative sense.
Main Text Introduction; relies on the standard definition for active-matter continuous time crystals, not proven by a new order parameter.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wave coarsening drives time crystallization in active solids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NKLYZGT7

@misc{pith2026250820052,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wave coarsening drives time crystallization in active solids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NKLYZGT7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20052}
}

read the original abstract

When metals are magnetized, emulsions phase separate, or galaxies cluster, domain walls and patterns form and irremediably coarsen over time. Such coarsening is universally driven by diffusive relaxation toward equilibrium. Here, we discover an inertial counterpart - wave coarsening - in active elastic media, where vibrations emerge and spontaneously grow in wavelength, period, and amplitude, before a globally synchronized state called a time crystal forms. We observe wave coarsening in one- and two-dimensional solids and capture its dynamical scaling. We further arrest the process by breaking momentum conservation and reveal a far-from-equilibrium nonlinear analogue to chiral topological edge modes. Our work unveils the crucial role of symmetries in the formation of time crystals and opens avenues for the control of nonlinear vibrations in active materials.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20052 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Elastodynamics from Eulerian Poisson-bracket formalism: application to chiral odd solids
cond-mat.soft 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

An Eulerian Poisson-bracket formulation for solids generates nonlinear terms absent in the Lagrangian frame and reproduces the odd elastic modulus of chiral active solids.
Curved Odd Elasticity
cond-mat.soft 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Curved surfaces pattern energy injection, open a finite-size spectral gap, and create thresholdless defect-bound and Rayleigh-edge oscillations in odd elastic solids.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[1]

Faraday, XVII

M. Faraday, XVII. on a peculiar class of acoustical figures; and on certain forms assumed by groups of particles upon vibrating elastic surfaces, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 121, 299 (1831)

work page
[2]

Apffel, F

B. Apffel, F. Novkoski, A. Eddi, and E. Fort, Floating under a levitating liquid, Nature 585, 48 (2020)

2020
[3]

J. J. Slim, J. Del Pino, and E. Verhagen, Programmable synthetic magnetism and chiral edge states in nano- optomechanical quantum hall networks, Nat. Commun. 16, 7471 (2025)

work page 2025
[4]

Zhang, P

J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I.-D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwanath, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a discrete time crystal, Nature 543, 217 (2017)

work page 2017
[5]

Peleg, A new chapter in the physics of firefly swarms, Nat

O. Peleg, A new chapter in the physics of firefly swarms, Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 72 (2023)

work page 2023
[6]

National Geographic, Watch: Fireflies glowing in sync to attract mates — national geographic

work page
[7]

Kongkhambut, J

P. Kongkhambut, J. Skulte, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, A. Hemmerich, and H. Keßler, Observation of a continuous time crystal, Science 377, 670 (2022)

work page 2022
[8]

X. Wu, Z. Wang, F. Yang, R. Gao, C. Liang, M. K. Tey, X. Li, T. Pohl, and L. You, Dissipative time crystal in a strongly interacting rydberg gas, Nat. Phys. 20, 1389 (2024)

2024

Show all 59 references

[9]

Peyret, R

G. Peyret, R. Mueller, J. d’Alessandro, S. Begnaud, P. Marcq, R.-M. M` ege, J. M. Yeomans, A. Doostmohammadi, and B. Ladoux, Sustained oscillations of epithelial cell sheets, Biophys. J. 117, 464 (2019)

2019
[10]

H. Xu, Y. Huang, R. Zhang, and Y. Wu, Autonomous waves and global motion modes in living active solids, Nat. Phys. 19, 46 (2023)

2023
[11]

T. H. Tan, A. Mietke, J. Li, Y. Chen, H. Higinbotham, P. J. Foster, S. Gokhale, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri, Odd dynamics of living chiral crystals, Nature 607, 287 (2022)

2022
[12]

Y.-C. Chao, S. Gokhale, L. Lin, A. Hastewell, A. Bacanu, Y. Chen, J. Li, J. Liu, H. Lee, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri, Selective excitation of work-generating cycles in nonreciprocal living solids, (2024), arXiv:2410.18017 [cond-mat.soft]

2024 arXiv
[13]

F. Gu, B. Guiselin, N. Bain, I. Zuriguel, and D. Bartolo, Emergence of collective oscillations in massive human 7 crowds, Nature 638, 112 (2025)

2025
[14]

Baconnier, D

P. Baconnier, D. Shohat, C. L´ opez, C. Coulais, V. D´ emery, G. D¨ uring, and O. Dauchot, Selective and collective actuation in active solids, Nat. Phys. 18, 1234 (2022)

2022
[15]

Liu, J.-Y

T. Liu, J.-Y. Ou, K. F. MacDonald, and N. I. Zheludev, Photonic metamaterial analogue of a continuous time crystal, Nat. Phys. 19, 986 (2023)

2023
[16]

Veenstra, C

J. Veenstra, C. Scheibner, M. Brandenbourger, J. Binysh, A. Souslov, V. Vitelli, and C. Coulais, Adaptive locomotion of active solids, Nature 639, 935 (2025)

2025
[17]

Reisenbauer, H

M. Reisenbauer, H. Rudolph, L. Egyed, K. Hornberger, A. V. Zasedatelev, M. Abuzarli, B. A. Stickler, and U. Deli´ c, Non-Hermitian dynamics and non-reciprocity of optically coupled nanoparticles, Nat. Phys. 20, 1629 (2024)

2024
[18]

Scheibner, A

C. Scheibner, A. Souslov, D. Banerjee, P. Sur´ owka, W. T. M. Irvine, and V. Vitelli, Odd elasticity, Nat. Phys. 16, 475 (2020)

2020
[19]

Fruchart, C

M. Fruchart, C. Scheibner, and V. Vitelli, Odd viscosity and odd elasticity, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 471 (2023)

2023
[20]

Bililign, F

E. Bililign, F. Balboa Usabiaga, Y. A. Ganan, A. Poncet, V. Soni, S. Magkiriadou, M. Shelley, D. Bartolo, and W. Irvine, Motile dislocations knead odd crystals into whorls, Nat. Phys. 18, 212 (2021)

2021
[21]

Poncet and D

A. Poncet and D. Bartolo, When soft crystals defy newton’s third law: Nonreciprocal mechanics and dislocation motility, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 048002 (2022)

2022
[22]

Guillet, A

S. Guillet, A. Poncet, M. Le Blay, W. T. M. Irvine, V. Vitelli, and D. Bartolo, Melting of nonreciprocal solids: How dislocations propel and fission in flowing crystals, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.122, e2412993122 (2025)

2025
[23]

Y. Chen, X. Li, C. Scheibner, V. Vitelli, and G. Huang, Realization of active metamaterials with odd micropolar elasticity, Nat. Commun. 12, 5935 (2021)

2021
[24]

Binysh, G

J. Binysh, G. Baardink, J. Veenstra, C. Coulais, and A. Souslov, More is less in unpercolated active solids, (2025), arXiv:2504.18362 [cond-mat.soft]

2025 arXiv
[25]

Fruchart, R

M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature 592, 363 (2021)

2021
[26]

X. M. de Wit, M. Fruchart, T. Khain, F. Toschi, and V. Vitelli, Pattern formation by turbulent cascades, Nature 627, 515 (2024)

2024
[27]

Raskatla, T

V. Raskatla, T. Liu, J. Li, K. F. MacDonald, and N. I. Zheludev, Continuous space-time crystal state driven by nonreciprocal optical forces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 136202 (2024)

2024
[28]

Pedergnana, A

T. Pedergnana, A. Faure-Beaulieu, R. Fleury, and N. Noiray, Loss-compensated non-reciprocal scattering based on synchronization, Nat. Commun. 15, 7436 (2024)

2024
[29]

Q. Mao, B. Wu, B. VanSaders, and H. M. Jaeger, Structural reconfiguration of interacting multi-particle systems through parametric pumping, Nat. Commun.16, 4637 (2025)

2025
[30]

Del Pino, J

J. Del Pino, J. J. Slim, and E. Verhagen, Non- hermitian chiral phononics through optomechanically induced squeezing, Nature 606, 82 (2022)

2022
[31]

C. C. Wanjura, J. J. Slim, J. del Pino, M. Brunelli, E. Verhagen, and A. Nunnenkamp, Quadrature nonreciprocity in bosonic networks without breaking time-reversal symmetry, Nat. Phys. 19, 1429 (2023)

2023
[32]

S. Chen, D. E. G¨ okmen, M. Fruchart, M. Krumbein, P. Silberzan, V. Yashunsky, and V. Vitelli, Chirality across scales in tissue dynamics, (2025), arXiv:2506.12276 [cond-mat.soft]

2025 arXiv
[33]

Brauns and M

F. Brauns and M. C. Marchetti, Nonreciprocal pattern formation of conserved fields, Phys. Rev. X. 14, 021014 (2024)

2024
[34]

Greve, G

D. Greve, G. Lovato, T. Frohoff-H¨ ulsmann, and U. Thiele, Coexistence of uniform and oscillatory states resulting from nonreciprocity and conservation laws, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 018303 (2025)

2025
[35]

A. J. Bray, Theory of phase-ordering kinetics, Adv. Phys. 51, 481 (2002)

2002
[36]

Yurke, A

B. Yurke, A. N. Pargellis, T. Kovacs, and D. A. Huse, Coarsening dynamics of the xy model, Phys. Rev. E. 47, 1525 (1993)

1993
[37]

Politi and C

P. Politi and C. Misbah, When does coarsening occur in the dynamics of one-dimensional fronts?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 090601 (2004)

2004
[38]

Suchanek, K

T. Suchanek, K. Kroy, and S. A. M. Loos, Entropy production in the nonreciprocal Cahn-Hilliard model, Phys. Rev. E. 108, 064610 (2023)

2023
[39]

Chardac, L

A. Chardac, L. A. Hoffmann, Y. Poupart, L. Giomi, and D. Bartolo, Topology-driven ordering of flocking matter, Phys. Rev. X. 11, 031069 (2021)

2021
[40]

Rana and P

N. Rana and P. Perlekar, Coarsening in the two- dimensional incompressible Toner-Tu equation: Signatures of turbulence, Phys. Rev. E. 102, 032617 (2020)

2020
[41]

parity anomaly

F. D. Haldane, Model for a quantum hall effect without Landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the “parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

2015
[42]

A. B. Khanikaev, R. Fleury, S. H. Mousavi, and A. Al` u, Topologically robust sound propagation in an angular- momentum-biased graphene-like resonator lattice, Nat. Commun. 6, 8260 (2015)

2015
[43]

L. M. Nash, D. Kleckner, A. Read, V. Vitelli, A. M. Turner, and W. T. M. Irvine, Topological mechanics of gyroscopic metamaterials, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 14495 (2015)

2015
[44]

Souslov, B

A. Souslov, B. C. van Zuiden, D. Bartolo, and V. Vitelli, Topological sound in active-liquid metamaterials, Nat. Phys. 13, 1091 (2017)

2017
[45]

Delplace, J

P. Delplace, J. B. Marston, and A. Venaille, Topological origin of equatorial waves, Science 358, 1075 (2017)

2017
[46]

Zhang, P

Z. Zhang, P. Delplace, and R. Fleury, Superior robustness of anomalous non-reciprocal topological edge states, Nature 598, 293 (2021)

2021
[47]

Fossati, C

M. Fossati, C. Scheibner, M. Fruchart, and V. Vitelli, Odd elasticity and topological waves in active surfaces, Phys. Rev. E. 109, 024608 (2024)

2024
[48]

Hanai, Nonreciprocal frustration: Time crystalline order-by-disorder phenomenon and a spin-glass-like state, Phys

R. Hanai, Nonreciprocal frustration: Time crystalline order-by-disorder phenomenon and a spin-glass-like state, Phys. Rev. X. 14, 011029 (2024)

2024
[49]

Zwicker, py-pde: A python package for solving partial differential equations, J

D. Zwicker, py-pde: A python package for solving partial differential equations, J. Open Source Software 5, 2158 (2020)

2020
[50]

Landau, E

L. Landau, E. Lifshitz, A. Kosevich, J. Sykes, L. Pitaevskii, and W. Reid, Theory of Elasticity, Course of theoretical physics (1986)

1986
[51]

L. Jin, R. Khajehtourian, J. Mueller, A. Rafsanjani, V. Tournat, K. Bertoldi, and D. M. Kochmann, Guided transition waves in multistable mechanical 8 metamaterials, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 2319 (2020)

2020
[52]

M. C. Cross and P. C. Hohenberg, Pattern formation outside of equilibrium, Rev. Mod. Phys. 65, 851 (1993)

1993
[53]

S. Saha, J. Agudo-Canalejo, and R. Golestanian, Scalar active mixtures: The nonreciprocal Cahn-Hilliard model, Phys. Rev. X. 10, 041009 (2020)

2020
[54]

Saha and R

S. Saha and R. Golestanian, Effervescence in a binary mixture with nonlinear non-reciprocal interactions, Nat. Commun. 16, 7310 (2025)

2025
[55]

Chajwa, N

R. Chajwa, N. Menon, S. Ramaswamy, and R. Govindarajan, Waves, algebraic growth, and clumping in sedimenting disk arrays, Phys. Rev. X. 10, 041016 (2020)

2020
[56]

Chatterjee, N

R. Chatterjee, N. Rana, R. A. Simha, P. Perlekar, and S. Ramaswamy, Inertia drives a flocking phase transition in viscous active fluids, Phys. Rev. X. 11, 031063 (2021)

2021
[57]

A. A. Nepomnyashchy, Coarsening versus pattern formation, C. R. Phys. 16, 267 (2015)

2015
[58]

Shklyaev and A

S. Shklyaev and A. Nepomnyashchy, Longwave Instabilities and Patterns in Fluids , Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics (2017)

2017
[59]

Cheng and G

W. Cheng and G. Hu, Odd elasticity realized by piezoelectric material with linear feedback, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 64, 2 (2021). ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank Tjeerd Weijers, Kasper van Nieuwland, Sven Koot, Melanie Pichon, for technical assistance and Colin Scheibner, Mich...

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Faraday, XVII

M. Faraday, XVII. on a peculiar class of acoustical figures; and on certain forms assumed by groups of particles upon vibrating elastic surfaces, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 121, 299 (1831)

work page

[2] [2]

Apffel, F

B. Apffel, F. Novkoski, A. Eddi, and E. Fort, Floating under a levitating liquid, Nature 585, 48 (2020)

2020

[3] [3]

J. J. Slim, J. Del Pino, and E. Verhagen, Programmable synthetic magnetism and chiral edge states in nano- optomechanical quantum hall networks, Nat. Commun. 16, 7471 (2025)

work page 2025

[4] [4]

Zhang, P

J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I.-D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwanath, N. Y. Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a discrete time crystal, Nature 543, 217 (2017)

work page 2017

[5] [5]

Peleg, A new chapter in the physics of firefly swarms, Nat

O. Peleg, A new chapter in the physics of firefly swarms, Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 72 (2023)

work page 2023

[6] [6]

National Geographic, Watch: Fireflies glowing in sync to attract mates — national geographic

work page

[7] [7]

Kongkhambut, J

P. Kongkhambut, J. Skulte, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, A. Hemmerich, and H. Keßler, Observation of a continuous time crystal, Science 377, 670 (2022)

work page 2022

[8] [8]

X. Wu, Z. Wang, F. Yang, R. Gao, C. Liang, M. K. Tey, X. Li, T. Pohl, and L. You, Dissipative time crystal in a strongly interacting rydberg gas, Nat. Phys. 20, 1389 (2024)

2024