Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 96 references

Exploring giant barium stars: $^{12}\rm{C}/^{13}\rm{C}$ ratio and elemental abundances of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Barium giant stars are systematically carbon-rich, and their carbon excess tracks the s-process material accreted from a former AGB companion.

desk verdict Useful homogeneous C/N/isotope catalog for 180 Ba giants, but oxygen is assumed and the advertised C–s correlation isn't controlled for metallicity. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.02441 v1 pith:BD4HAKKR submitted 2025-09-02 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

M. P. Roriz , N. A. Drake , N. Holanda , M. Lugaro , B. Cseh , S. Junqueira , C. B. Pereira This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords bariumstarss-processcarbonabundancesnitrogenisotoperatio12C/13CAGBmasstransferspectralsynthesisCH
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper analyzes carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and carbon isotope ratios in 180 barium giant stars, which are red giants in binary systems that received enriched material from an evolved companion. It finds that these stars are about 0.18 dex more carbon-rich than ordinary giants and that the carbon excess correlates strongly with the average s-process abundance. Nitrogen is roughly flat near [N/Fe]~+0.5 and correlates moderately with sodium, pointing to first dredge-up and CN/NeNa cycling. About 83% of the measured stars have 12C/13C below 20, and only one star, HD 107541, has C/O>1, leading the authors to reclassify it as a CH star. The central claim is that the transferred AGB material is the dominant light-element enrichment in barium giants and is co-produced with the s-process.

What carries the argument

The machinery is LTE synthetic-spectrum fitting of molecular bands: the C2 band near 5635 Å for carbon, the 12CN features near 8000 Å for nitrogen, and the 13CN features at 8004-8020 Å for the 12C/13C ratio. A standard spectral synthesis code and 1D model atmospheres are used to fit observed spectra. Oxygen abundances are not measured but assigned from the published [O/Fe]-versus-[Fe/H] relation for normal field stars, with the assumption that barium giants follow the same trend.

What would settle it

Measure oxygen directly from the [O I] 6300 Å line, or from an NLTE-corrected O I triplet, for a metallicity-stratified subsample that includes HD 107541, HD 107270, and HD 204075. If their true [O/Fe] deviates from the assumed normal-field-giant relation by more than about 0.1 dex, the reported C/O values and HD 107541's CH classification cross the C/O=1 boundary; agreement would confirm the weakest link in the analysis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes that carbon abundance in barium giants is a direct, quantitative tracer of the s-process pollution they received: the mean carbon excess over normal giants is +0.18±0.05 dex, and [C/Fe] correlates with the average s-process index [s/Fe] with Pearson correlation rho=+0.78, fitted as [C/Fe]=(0.39±0.02)[s/Fe]-(0.28±0.02). The authors also find that 83% of the 145 program stars with measured ratios have 12C/13C<20, showing that CN cycling within the current star dominates the isotope ratio, while the carbon excess itself is accreted. The only star with C/O>1, HD 107541, is classified as a CH star. The paper concludes that the transferred AGB material is co-produced with the

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that barium giants have the same oxygen-to-iron ratios as normal field stars: oxygen was never measured for the program stars, it was assigned from a published [O/Fe]-versus-[Fe/H] relation, and a roughly 0.1 dex systematic error would push near-unity C/O stars across the C/O=1 boundary and shift the derived carbon abundances through CO equilibrium.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Carbon abundance can serve as an independent tracer of s-process contamination in barium giants, since the measured [C/Fe] tracks [s/Fe] with a strong correlation.
  • The persistent +0.18 dex carbon offset means first dredge-up does not erase the accreted signature, so barium giants retain a record of their mass-transfer history.
  • HD 107541, with C/O=1.32, sits on the CH-star side of the C/O=1 boundary, suggesting a continuum between barium giants and CH stars rather than a sharp dichotomy.
  • The nitrogen rise seen at low metallicity, if real, would indicate extra-mixing in the AGB donor and motivates larger samples of low-metallicity barium giants.
  • New red-giant models with surface layers pre-enriched in carbon and nitrogen from accreted AGB matter are needed to quantify how dredge-up reshapes the polluted envelope.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • I infer that if the carbon-s correlation survives direct oxygen measurements, carbon could become a cheap proxy for s-process strength in large spectroscopic surveys where heavy-element lines are weak.
  • I infer that the oxygen assumption is the fragile link behind the C/O<1 claim: a systematic offset of about 0.1 dex in the assumed [O/Fe] would move near-unity C/O stars like HD 107270 and HD 204075 across the boundary.
  • I infer that the three stars with 12C/13C>60 may be cases where accreted material was diluted less, or where an intermediate neutron-capture process contributed, although the paper only flags this as a possibility through its Nb-Mo discussion.
  • I infer that the paper's simple dilution calculation implies specific accreted-mass predictions that future models of polluted giants could test against known orbital parameters of these binary systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper presents a classical LTE abundance analysis of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen plus the 12C/13C ratio for 180 barium giant stars, using synthetic-spectrum fits to C2 and CN features. Oxygen is not measured; it is assigned from the Melendez & Barbuy (2002) [O/Fe] versus [Fe/H] relation for normal field stars. The main results are that [C/Fe] is systematically higher in Ba giants than in normal giants (mean offset +0.18 +/- 0.05 dex), that [C/Fe] correlates with the average s-process index [s/Fe] (Pearson rho = +0.78; fit [C/Fe] = 0.39[s/Fe] - 0.28), that C/O < 1 for the whole sample except HD 107541 (C/O = 1.32, classified as a CH star), and that 83% of the 145 stars with measured isotopic ratios have 12C/13C < 20. These results are interpreted as evidence for AGB mass transfer with co-production of carbon and s-process elements.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a valuable homogeneous dataset: 180 Ba giants with C, N, and 12C/13C from a consistent LTE methodology, with template-star error propagation, machine-readable tables, and internal checks against FDU tracks and a dilution toy model. The paper also explicitly connects the C enhancement to the s-process enrichment expected from low-mass AGB donors. The main load-bearing claims, however, depend on two assumptions that need quantitative support: (1) the [C/Fe]-[s/Fe] correlation is presented without controlling for the strong [Fe/H] dependence of both quantities, and (2) the C/O results and the CH classification of HD 107541 rely on oxygen abundances that are assumed, not measured, for the program stars. The isotopic-ratio statistics also need a clearer denominator. These issues are addressable and do not undermine the basic measurement strategy, but they are central enough to require revision.

major comments (1)
  1. [§5] The statement that 'the models generally predict [C/Fe] ratios higher than the observed value, allowing for the decrease due to the FDU' is qualitative. A quantitative comparison (e.g., listed model values for the five highlighted stars) would strengthen the discussion, though this is not essential for the main conclusions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [§2] The stated metallicity range of the sample (−1.0 ≲ [Fe/H] ≲ +0.3) is consistent with HD 26, but the text should note that HD 26 is a new addition and clarify whether it is included in the 180-star sample.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Core C/N/isotopic measurements and the [C/Fe]-[s/Fe] correlation are independent; the abstract-level C/O<1 finding and HD 107541 CH classification reduce partially to the assumed, unmeasured MB02 oxygen input.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3 (oxygen assigned from MB02); Sections 4.3 and 6 (C/O<1 and HD 107541 CH classification)]
    "Relying on this analysis, we constrained the oxygen abundances for the program stars, assuming here that Ba stars follow the same trend as the normal field stars. ... The entire sample present C/O < 1, as commonly found in Ba stars, except for one star (HD 107541), with C/O = 1.32, which may be placed to the family of the CH stars."

    Oxygen is not measured: log ε(O) is set from the MB02 [O/Fe]-[Fe/H] relation for normal field stars, 'assuming that Ba stars follow the same trend.' The abstract's 'Except for HD 107541, the entire sample shows C/O < 1' and the CH reclassification of HD 107541 (C/O = 1.32) are therefore measured C divided by assumed O. Table 2 shows the derived C itself moves +0.05 to +0.15 dex for +0.20 dex in O, so the C entering C/O is partly co-determined by the same input. The Fig. 1 check (one star per 0.2-dex bin) still deviates locally by up to ~0.1 dex, enough to move stars with C/O just below 1 (HD 107270, HD 204075) across the boundary. Not wholly forced (C is measured), but the C/O headline and HD 107541's CH classification reduce partially by construction to the assumed O.

full rationale

The paper's main measurement chain is self-contained: C (C2 band at 5635 Å), N (12CN at 7995–8005 Å), and 12C/13C (13CN at 8004–8005 Å) are derived by fitting synthetic LTE spectra to observed FEROS spectra, and none of these outputs is defined in terms of the paper's conclusions. The flagship [C/Fe]–[s/Fe] correlation (ρ = +0.78) compares an independent molecular-carbon tracer with atomic s-process lines from Papers I–III; it is not circular. The absence of a partial correlation controlling for [Fe/H] is a possible confounding or robustness limitation, but a confound is not a reduction-by-construction, so it does not raise the circularity score by itself. The genuine partial circularity is the oxygen channel. Section 3 assigns O from the MB02 normal-giant relation rather than measuring it, and every O-dependent conclusion — the abstract's 'entire sample shows C/O < 1,' the Ba/CH segregation via C/O, the five C/O-selected objects compared with AGB models in Section 5, and the CH classification of HD 107541 — is computed against this assumed O. Because Table 2 documents that the fitted C abundance itself responds to the assumed O, the C/O results are partly manufactured by the input rather than purely measured. The paper is transparent about the assumption, justifies it with external evidence, and validates it on roughly one star per 0.2-dex bin (mean deviation 0.09 ± 0.04 dex), so this is partial, not full, circularity; the paper itself states that 'uncertainties in log ε(O) were not estimated.' Internal inconsistencies further weaken the C/O headline: HD 26 is reported with C/O = 1.06 (Section 4.3, Table 3), contradicting 'except for HD 107541'; and 'another three stars ... close to unity' is followed by a list of four stars. Also non-circular but notable: the abstract's '~80% of the sampled stars' for 12C/13C < 20 does not match the paper's own Section 4.3 statistic (83% of 145 stars with determined ratios; ≈67% of the full 180-star sample if lower limits are included). Self-citations (Papers I–IV, Drake & Pereira 2008) carry data and methodology with independent content and are not load-bearing circular premises. Net: the central claims stand on independent measurements; only the oxygen-dependent conclusions partially reduce to the assumed input.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's strongest measured quantities (C, N, 12C/13C from spectral synthesis) rest on standard practice and are largely self-contained. The notable borrowed input is oxygen: for 170+ stars log epsilon(O) is assigned from the MB02 normal-giant relation, which then feeds both the C2 synthesis and every C/O result. The FDU dilution model in Section 4.2 uses explicitly hand-tuned masses. No invented entities; the i-process invoked for HD 107541 is cited from den Hartogh et al. (2023).

free parameters (3)
  • Per-star oxygen abundance from MB02 [O/Fe] vs [Fe/H] curve = log epsilon(O) per star, read off the Melendez & Barbuy (2002) normal-star relation
    O is not measured for most stars; the assigned value enters the C2/CN synthesis and all C/O ratios, making the C/O < 1 claim partly assumption-driven.
  • Dilution toy model mixing masses = 0.5 Msun solar-composition + 0.3 Msun C-depleted + 0.1 Msun accreted AGB material
    Section 4.2: hand-chosen masses reproduce the observed ~0.2 dex FDU drop and the Ba-versus-normal C offset; illustrative rather than derived.
  • [s/Fe] index composition = Mean of [Sr, Y, Zr, La, Ce, Nd]/Fe
    Section 4.4: the s-process tracer used for the correlation analyses; the Pearson coefficients depend on this element choice from the previous papers.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption LTE and 1D plane-parallel atmosphere approximation for all 180 stars
    Invoked throughout Section 3: MOOG synthesis with Kurucz (1993) 1D models; NLTE corrections applied only to the O i 7771.9 A check (Takeda 2003), not to the C2/CN fits that set the central results.
  • domain assumption Ba stars follow the normal field star [O/Fe] vs [Fe/H] relation of Melendez & Barbuy (2002)
    Section 3: each star's O abundance is read from this normal-star curve, used in the C2 synthesis (CO molecular equilibrium) and in all C/O values; justified by arguments (i)-(iii) and a ~1 star per 0.2 dex bin check.
  • standard math Solar abundance scale of Grevesse & Sauval (1998) as normalization
    Section 3: log epsilon(C)=8.52, log epsilon(N)=7.92, log epsilon(O)=8.83, log epsilon(Fe)=7.50; literature comparison samples are re-scaled to the same values to reduce systematics.
  • standard math First dredge-up conserves log epsilon(C+N)
    Section 4.2 and Figure 4: used to build expected C-N tracks for single stars; the observed offsets are then interpreted as accreted-material signatures.
  • domain assumption Atmospheric parameters (Teff, log g, xi, [Fe/H]) from Papers I-IV are adequate and propagated via three template stars
    Sections 2 and 3.1: parameters adopted unchanged from previous papers; uncertainties estimated only for three Teff-binned template stars and extrapolated to the whole sample.
  • domain assumption 12C/13C lower limits (e.g., >= 32) are genuine lower bounds and can be excluded from ratio statistics
    Sections 3 and 4.3: 35 stars with only lower limits are dropped from the 12C/13C < 20 statistics; these stars by definition have ratios above 20, so the headline fraction is sensitive to this exclusion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring giant barium stars: $^{12}\rm{C}/^{13}\rm{C}$ ratio and elemental abundances of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BD4HAKKR

@misc{pith2026250902441,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring giant barium stars: $^12\rmC/^13\rmC$ ratio and elemental abundances of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BD4HAKKR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.02441}
}
abstract

Barium (Ba) stars belong to binary systems that underwent mass transfer events. As a consequence, their envelopes were enriched with material synthesized in the interiors of their evolved companions via \textit{slow} neutron-capture nucleosynthesis, the $s$-process. As post-interacting binaries, Ba stars figure as powerful tracers of the $s$-process. In this study, we conduct a classical local thermodynamic equilibrium analysis for a sample of 180 Ba giant stars to find complementary insights for the $s$-process, in form of elemental abundances of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen, as well as the $^{12}\rm{C}/^{13}\rm{C}$ ratio. We found carbon abundances systematically larger than those observed in normal giants, with [C/Fe] ratios ranging within from $-0.30$ to $+0.60$~dex. As expected, the [C/Fe] ratios increase for lower metallicity regimes and are strongly correlated with the average $s$-process abundances. Nitrogen abundances have a flat behavior around $\rm{[N/Fe]}\sim+0.50$~dex and are moderately correlated with sodium abundances. Except for HD~107541, the entire sample shows $\rm{C/O}<1$. We found $^{12}\rm{C}/^{13}\rm{C}<20$ for $\sim80\%$ of the sampled stars and $^{12}\rm{C}/^{13}\rm{C}>60$ for three objects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.02441 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Observed average [O/Fe] ratios (blue dots) for targets selected from the program stars; these objects are representative within each bin of metallicity and cover the entire interval considered in this work, and the error bars rep￾resent the standard deviations. The black curve comes from the average [O/Fe] values reported by Mel´endez & Barbuy (2002), and the shaded area outlines their standard devia￾tions. Data for… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Observed (dots) and synthetic (solid lines) spec￾tra around the spectral region of the C2 molecular band at 5 635 ˚A (top panel) and CN absorption features at 8 000 ˚A (bottom panel) for HD 107541. The carbon and nitrogen abundances that provide the best fits (blue lines) are indi￾cated in the panels. The shaded blue areas show the effects in changing the carbon and nitrogen abundances around the adopted values. The… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Carbon (top) and nitrogen (bottom) abundance ratios to Fe derived for the program stars (grey dots) as a function of metallicity. Typical error bars are shown in top right side of the panels. The lines outline the average [C/Fe] and [N/Fe] ratios observed in our sample of Ba giants (blue solid line), normal field giants (red solid line) and normal field dwarfs (red dashed line). The error bars in the blue lines repr… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Expected evolution (dashed curves) of the pho￾tospheric abundances of carbon and nitrogen, as the star leaves the main-sequence and becomes a red giant. For dif￾ferent metallicity regimes, identified by colors in this figure and labeled in the curves, these tracks take…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Panel (a): log ϵ(C + N) versus [Fe/H]; panel (b): C/O ratios versus [Fe/H]; panel (c): log (C/N) versus log (O/N); panel (d): 12C/13C ratios versus [Fe/H]. The respective solar values are marked by the ⊙ symbol. As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ), the data show a larger spread, with a less evident trend (ρP = +0.32). A linear fit provides [N/Fe] = (+0.18 ± 0.04) × [s/Fe] + (0.30 ± 0.03). For completeness, data for normal field giants (crosses) are also plotted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Carbon (top panel) and nitrogen (bottom panel) abundance ratios to Fe versus sodium abundances observed in Ba giants (grey dots); typical error bars are shown. Data for normal giants (crosses; taken from Luck & Heiter 2007; Takeda et al. 2019) and post-AGB stars (blue …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 20 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    W 6 )Z b

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    M., & Barbuy , B

    Allen , D. M., & Barbuy , B. 2006 a , , 454, 895, 10.1051/0004-6361:20064912

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20064912 2006

  5. [5]

    2006 b , , 454, 917, 10.1051/0004-6361:20064968

    ---. 2006 b , , 454, 917, 10.1051/0004-6361:20064968

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20064968 2006

  6. [6]

    1988, , 191, 121

    Barbuy , B. 1988, , 191, 121

    1988

  7. [7]

    Barbuy , B., Jorissen , A., Rossi , S. C. F., & Arnould , M. 1992, , 262, 216

    1992

  8. [8]

    2019, , 489, 1082, 10.1093/mnras/stz2158

    Battino , U., Tattersall , A., Lederer-Woods , C., et al. 2019, , 489, 1082, 10.1093/mnras/stz2158

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2158 2019

Show all 96 references
  1. [9]

    P., & Keenan , P

    Bidelman , W. P., & Keenan , P. C. 1951, , 114, 473, 10.1086/145488

    1951 doi

  2. [10]

    A., Antipova , L

    Boyarchuk , A. A., Antipova , L. I., Boyarchuk , M. E., & Savanov , I. S. 2001, Astronomy Reports, 45, 301, 10.1134/1.1361322

    2001 doi

  3. [11]

    M., Burbidge , G

    Burbidge , E. M., Burbidge , G. R., Fowler , W. A., & Hoyle , F. 1957, Reviews of Modern Physics, 29, 547, 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.547

    1957 doi

  4. [12]

    Busso , M., Gallino , R., & Wasserburg , G. J. 1999, , 37, 239, 10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.239

    1999 doi

  5. [13]

    G., & Sneden , C

    Carretta , E., Gratton , R. G., & Sneden , C. 2000, , 356, 238, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0002407

    2000 doi arXiv

  6. [14]

    2009, , 696, 797, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/797

    Cristallo , S., Straniero , O., Gallino , R., et al. 2009, , 696, 797, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/797

    2009 doi

  7. [15]

    2011, , 197, 17, 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/17

    Cristallo , S., Piersanti , L., Straniero , O., et al. 2011, , 197, 17, 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/17

    2011 doi

  8. [16]

    2018, , 620, A146, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834079

    Cseh , B., Lugaro , M., D'Orazi , V., et al. 2018, , 620, A146, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834079

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    P., et al

    Cseh , B., Vil \'a gos , B., Roriz , M. P., et al. 2022, , 660, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142468

    2022 doi

  10. [18]

    B., Pereira , C

    de Castro , D. B., Pereira , C. B., Roig , F., et al. 2016, , 459, 4299, 10.1093/mnras/stw815

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    2016, , 587, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527430

    De Smedt , K., Van Winckel , H., Kamath , D., et al. 2016, , 587, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527430

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    De Smedt , K., Van Winckel , H., Kamath , D., & Wood , P. R. 2015, , 583, A56, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526743

    2015 doi

  13. [21]

    I., et al

    De Smedt , K., Van Winckel , H., Karakas , A. I., et al. 2012, , 541, A67, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219150

    2012 doi

  14. [22]

    W., Yag \"u e L \'o pez , A., Cseh , B., et al

    den Hartogh , J. W., Yag \"u e L \'o pez , A., Cseh , B., et al. 2023, , 672, A143, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244189

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    A., & Pereira , C

    Drake , N. A., & Pereira , C. B. 2008, , 135, 1070, 10.1088/0004-6256/135/3/1070

    2008 doi

  16. [24]

    2023, in Highlights on Spanish Astrophysics XI, ed

    Escorza , A. 2023, in Highlights on Spanish Astrophysics XI, ed. M. Manteiga , L. Bellot , P. Benavidez , A. de Lorenzo-C \'a ceres , M. A. Fuente , M. J. Mart \' nez , M. V \'a zquez Acosta , & C. Dafonte , 1

    2023

  17. [25]

    Escorza , A., & De Rosa , R. J. 2023, , 671, A97, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244782

    2023 doi

  18. [26]

    2020, , 639, A24, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037487

    Escorza , A., Siess , L., Van Winckel , H., & Jorissen , A. 2020, , 639, A24, 10.1051/0004-6361/202037487

    2020 doi

  19. [27]

    H., & Joyce , R

    Ga an , C., Miko ajewska , J., Hinkle , K. H., & Joyce , R. R. 2016, , 455, 1282, 10.1093/mnras/stv2365

    2016 doi

  20. [28]

    2017, , 466, 2194, 10.1093/mnras/stw3266

    ---. 2017, , 466, 2194, 10.1093/mnras/stw3266

    2017 doi

  21. [29]

    1998, , 497, 388, 10.1086/305437

    Gallino , R., Arlandini , C., Busso , M., et al. 1998, , 497, 388, 10.1086/305437

    1998 doi

  22. [30]

    2000, , 362, 599

    Goriely , S., & Mowlavi , N. 2000, , 362, 599

    2000

  23. [31]

    2016, , 455, 402, 10.1093/mnras/stv2011

    Goswami , A., Aoki , W., & Karinkuzhi , D. 2016, , 455, 402, 10.1093/mnras/stv2011

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    G., Sneden , C., Carretta , E., & Bragaglia , A

    Gratton , R. G., Sneden , C., Carretta , E., & Bragaglia , A. 2000, , 354, 169

    2000

  25. [33]

    Grevesse , N., & Sauval , A. J. 1998, , 85, 161, 10.1023/A:1005161325181

    1998 doi

  26. [34]

    1967, , 147, 624, 10.1086/149040

    Iben , Icko, J. 1967, , 147, 624, 10.1086/149040

    1967 doi

  27. [35]

    2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Jorissen , A. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 303, Symbiotic Stars Probing Stellar Evolution, ed. R. L. M. Corradi , J. Mikolajewska , & T. J. Mahoney , 25

    2003

  28. [36]

    Jorissen , A., Boffin , H. M. J., Karinkuzhi , D., et al. 2019, , 626, A127, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834630

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    1998, , 332, 877, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9801272

    Jorissen , A., Van Eck , S., Mayor , M., & Udry , S. 1998, , 332, 877, 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9801272

    1998 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    Jorissen , A., Za c s , L., Udry , S., Lindgren , H., & Musaev , F. A. 2005, , 441, 1135, 10.1051/0004-6361:20053298

    2005 doi

  31. [39]

    2011, Reviews of Modern Physics, 83, 157, 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.157

    K \"a ppeler , F., Gallino , R., Bisterzo , S., & Aoki , W. 2011, Reviews of Modern Physics, 83, 157, 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.157

    2011 doi

  32. [40]

    I., & Lattanzio , J

    Karakas , A. I., & Lattanzio , J. C. 2014, , 31, e030, 10.1017/pasa.2014.21

    2014 doi

  33. [41]

    I., & Lugaro , M

    Karakas , A. I., & Lugaro , M. 2016, , 825, 26, 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/26

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    I., Lugaro , M., Carlos , M., et al

    Karakas , A. I., Lugaro , M., Carlos , M., et al. 2018, , 477, 421, 10.1093/mnras/sty625

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    2021, , 645, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038891

    Karinkuzhi , D., Van Eck , S., Goriely , S., et al. 2021, , 645, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038891

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    2018, , 618, A32, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833084

    Karinkuzhi , D., Van Eck , S., Jorissen , A., et al. 2018, , 618, A32, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833084

    2018 doi

  37. [45]

    1999, The Messenger, 95, 8

    Kaufer , A., Stahl , O., Tubbesing , S., et al. 1999, The Messenger, 95, 8

    1999

  38. [46]

    I., & Lugaro , M

    Kobayashi , C., Karakas , A. I., & Lugaro , M. 2020, , 900, 179, 10.3847/1538-4357/abae65

    2020 doi

  39. [47]

    1993, ATLAS9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid

    Kurucz , R. 1993, ATLAS9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid. Kurucz CD-ROM No. 13. Cambridge, 13

    1993

  40. [48]

    E., & Bond , H

    Luck , R. E., & Bond , H. E. 1991, , 77, 515, 10.1086/191615

    1991 doi

  41. [49]

    E., & Heiter , U

    Luck , R. E., & Heiter , U. 2006, , 131, 3069, 10.1086/504080

    2006 doi

  42. [50]

    2007, , 133, 2464, 10.1086/513194

    ---. 2007, , 133, 2464, 10.1086/513194

    2007 doi

  43. [51]

    2023, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 73, 315, 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102422-080857

    Lugaro , M., Pignatari , M., Reifarth , R., & Wiescher , M. 2023, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 73, 315, 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102422-080857

    2023 doi

  44. [52]

    A., Plez , B., et al

    Masseron , T., Johnson , J. A., Plez , B., et al. 2010, , 509, A93, 10.1051/0004-6361/200911744

    2010 doi

  45. [53]

    D., Fletcher , J

    McClure , R. D., Fletcher , J. M., & Nemec , J. M. 1980, , 238, L35, 10.1086/183252

    1980 doi

  46. [54]

    2002, , 575, 474, 10.1086/341142

    Mel \'e ndez , J., & Barbuy , B. 2002, , 575, 474, 10.1086/341142

    2002 doi

  47. [55]

    V., Bienaym \'e , O., Gorbaneva , T

    Mishenina , T. V., Bienaym \'e , O., Gorbaneva , T. I., et al. 2006, , 456, 1109, 10.1051/0004-6361:20065141

    2006 doi

  48. [56]

    M., Busso , M., & Wasserburg , G

    Nollett , K. M., Busso , M., & Wasserburg , G. J. 2003, , 582, 1036, 10.1086/344817

    2003 doi

  49. [57]

    1994, , 281, 775

    North , P., Berthet , S., & Lanz , T. 1994, , 281, 775

    1994

  50. [58]

    B., Baella , N

    Pereira , C. B., Baella , N. O., Drake , N. A., Miranda , L. F., & Roig , F. 2017, , 841, 50, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d78

    2017 doi

  51. [59]

    B., & Drake , N

    Pereira , C. B., & Drake , N. A. 2009, , 496, 791, 10.1051/0004-6361/200810851

    2009 doi

  52. [60]

    B., Gallino , R., & Bisterzo , S

    Pereira , C. B., Gallino , R., & Bisterzo , S. 2012 a , , 538, A48, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117398

    2012 doi

  53. [61]

    B., Jilinski , E., Drake , N

    Pereira , C. B., Jilinski , E., Drake , N. A., et al. 2012 b , , 543, A58, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219122

    2012 doi

  54. [62]

    B., Sales Silva , J

    Pereira , C. B., Sales Silva , J. V., Chavero , C., Roig , F., & Jilinski , E. 2011, , 533, A51, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117070

    2011 doi

  55. [63]

    P., Shejeelammal , J., & Masseron , T

    Purandardas , M., Goswami , A., Goswami , P. P., Shejeelammal , J., & Masseron , T. 2019, , 486, 3266, 10.1093/mnras/stz759

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    2021, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

    R Core Team . 2021, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

    2021

  57. [65]

    Ram \' rez , I., Allende Prieto , C., & Lambert , D. L. 2013, , 764, 78, 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/78

    2013 doi

  58. [66]

    E., Lambert , D

    Reddy , B. E., Lambert , D. L., & Allende Prieto , C. 2006, , 367, 1329, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10148.x

    2006

  59. [67]

    E., Tomkin , J., Lambert , D

    Reddy , B. E., Tomkin , J., Lambert , D. L., & Allende Prieto , C. 2003, , 340, 304, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06305.x

    2003

  60. [68]

    2004, , 417, 269, 10.1051/0004-6361:20034397

    Reyniers , M., Van Winckel , H., Gallino , R., & Straniero , O. 2004, , 417, 269, 10.1051/0004-6361:20034397

    2004 doi

  61. [69]

    2022, , 30, 7, 10.1007/s00159-022-00144-z

    Romano , D. 2022, , 30, 7, 10.1007/s00159-022-00144-z

    2022 doi

  62. [70]

    P., Holanda , N., da Concei c \ a o , L

    Roriz , M. P., Holanda , N., da Concei c \ a o , L. V., et al. 2024 a , , 167, 184, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad29f2

    2024 doi

  63. [71]

    P., Lugaro , M., Junqueira , S., et al

    Roriz , M. P., Lugaro , M., Junqueira , S., et al. 2024 b , , 528, 4354, 10.1093/mnras/stae221

    2024 doi

  64. [72]

    P., Lugaro , M., Pereira , C

    Roriz , M. P., Lugaro , M., Pereira , C. B., et al. 2021 a , , 501, 5834, 10.1093/mnras/staa3888

    2021 doi

  65. [73]

    2021 b , , 507, 1956, 10.1093/mnras/stab2014

    ---. 2021 b , , 507, 1956, 10.1093/mnras/stab2014

    2021 doi

  66. [74]

    P., Pereira , C

    Roriz , M. P., Pereira , C. B., Junqueira , S., et al. 2023, , 518, 5414, 10.1093/mnras/stac3378

    2023 doi

  67. [75]

    J., & Boothroyd , A

    Sackmann , I. J., & Boothroyd , A. I. 1992, , 392, L71, 10.1086/186428

    1992 doi

  68. [76]

    P., Rathour , R

    Shejeelammal , J., Goswami , A., Goswami , P. P., Rathour , R. S., & Masseron , T. 2020, , 492, 3708, 10.1093/mnras/stz3518

    2020 doi

  69. [77]

    J., et al

    Simmerer , J., Sneden , C., Cowan , J. J., et al. 2004, , 617, 1091, 10.1086/424504

    2004 doi

  70. [78]

    V., Hinkle , K

    Smith , V. V., Hinkle , K. H., Cunha , K., et al. 2002, , 124, 3241, 10.1086/344482

    2002 doi

  71. [79]

    V., Cunha , K., Shetrone , M

    Smith , V. V., Cunha , K., Shetrone , M. D., et al. 2013, , 765, 16, 10.1088/0004-637X/765/1/16

    2013 doi

  72. [80]

    2012, MOOG: LTE line analysis and spectrum synthesis , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1202.009

    Sneden , C., Bean , J., Ivans , I., Lucatello , S., & Sobeck , J. 2012, MOOG: LTE line analysis and spectrum synthesis , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1202.009. 1202.009

    2012

  73. [81]

    P., Prosser , C

    Sneden , C., Kraft , R. P., Prosser , C. F., & Langer , G. E. 1991, , 102, 2001, 10.1086/116023

    1991 doi

  74. [82]

    Sneden , C. A. 1973, PhD thesis, University of Texas, Austin

    1973

  75. [83]

    2005, , 430, 655, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041274

    Spite , M., Cayrel , R., Plez , B., et al. 2005, , 430, 655, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041274

    2005 doi

  76. [84]

    2003, , 402, 343, 10.1051/0004-6361:20030217

    Takeda , Y. 2003, , 402, 343, 10.1051/0004-6361:20030217

    2003 doi

  77. [85]

    2023, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 23, 025008, 10.1088/1674-4527/acab46

    ---. 2023, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 23, 025008, 10.1088/1674-4527/acab46

    2023 doi

  78. [86]

    2019, , 71, 119, 10.1093/pasj/psz104

    Takeda , Y., Omiya , M., Harakawa , H., & Sato , B. 2019, , 71, 119, 10.1093/pasj/psz104

    2019 doi

  79. [87]

    2008, , 60, 781, 10.1093/pasj/60.4.781

    Takeda , Y., Sato , B., & Murata , D. 2008, , 60, 781, 10.1093/pasj/60.4.781

    2008 doi

  80. [88]

    X., Woosley , S

    Timmes , F. X., Woosley , S. E., & Weaver , T. A. 1995, , 98, 617, 10.1086/192172

    1995 doi

  81. [89]

    1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Tody , D. 1986, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 627, Instrumentation in astronomy VI, ed. D. L. Crawford , 733, 10.1117/12.968154

    1986 doi

  82. [90]

    L., Edvardsson , B., Gustafsson , B., & Nissen , P

    Tomkin , J., Lambert , D. L., Edvardsson , B., Gustafsson , B., & Nissen , P. E. 1989, , 219, L15

    1989

  83. [91]

    van Aarle , E., Van Winckel , H., De Smedt , K., Kamath , D., & Wood , P. R. 2013, , 554, A106, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219988

    2013 doi

  84. [92]

    A., Lugaro , M., Karakas , A

    van Raai , M. A., Lugaro , M., Karakas , A. I., Garc \' a-Hern \'a ndez , D. A., & Yong , D. 2012, , 540, A44, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117896

    2012 doi

  85. [93]

    2000, , 354, 135

    Van Winckel , H., & Reyniers , M. 2000, , 354, 135. astro-ph/9910112

    2000 arXiv

  86. [94]

    Vanture , A. D. 1992, , 104, 1986, 10.1086/116374

    1992 doi

  87. [95]

    2024, , 688, A164, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450084

    Vil \'a gos , B., Cseh , B., Yag \"u e L \'o pez , A., et al. 2024, , 688, A164, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450084

    2024 doi

  88. [96]

    E., & Weaver , T

    Woosley , S. E., & Weaver , T. A. 1995, , 101, 181, 10.1086/192237

    1995 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.